Disqualification then Incarceration

@santiagobenites

3 ай бұрын

In a just world.

He’s running for office because he knew he would have all these legal costs and didn’t want to bear them himself. So he’s grifting all his misled supporters.

@Joe-pc3hs

3 ай бұрын

I think you totally missed the irony there

Isn’t it called the office of the President of the United States? Doesn’t that make him an officer

@QUICKBOOKS1

3 ай бұрын

That would be logical, wouldn't it?

@jamesyoungblood6231

3 ай бұрын

Yes, the President is an officer but he is NOT an "Officer of the United States". The office of the President of United States is in a category all by itself.

@garyc1221

3 ай бұрын

An Officer of a corporation is someone appointed or elected who has voting rights and gives direction to the corporation. He is guilty.

@imperialmotoring3789

3 ай бұрын

Are the illegals officers?

@patricelabelle1386

3 ай бұрын

The people who wrote the Amendment were asked if it applied to the president during the ratification in Congress, and they pointed out the word officer and indicated that it included the President.

The Any Person line who has swore a Oath and breaks that oath can't serve again in any government office. Being elected to the office of president or vice-president is considered a officer

It’s in simple English , no Latin , no ambiguity.

The strange thing about this word scramble is. The only people who use this strategy are typically in trouble and are grasping at straws to save their neck or their job. More successful people understand what is put forward and do not get paid to try to sway what has been past practice.

@SamlovesLulu

2 ай бұрын

I'm guessing that that all makes perfect sense on Counter-Earth.

lock him up

@Theprincess420

3 ай бұрын

Nope

@cherrycarter5094

3 ай бұрын

​@@Theprincess420yes

Wish she was on the Supreme Court.

I wasnt speding officer, in fact my car remained stationary and the road was moving

@aliceinwonderland887

3 ай бұрын

🤣

@Ricimer671

3 ай бұрын

Great, I' be never seen an argument based on relativity before, well done!

Look in any dictionary, uphold means support, what else could it mean?

@SamlovesLulu

2 ай бұрын

>sigh

Thank you for this interesting discussion.

excellent

For everyone telling she said nothing, did you watch the video? Everything was clearly stated. Put Closed Caption on, if you refuse to listen to her! If you don't want to listen, that is on YOU!

It's adults playing childish language games to suite their own self interest. We are all victims of their damnable sophistry.

@fuzzfacelogic789

3 ай бұрын

Oh yes!

I love how America looks at their Founding Fathers as some kind of gods that knew everything and put everything they wanted perfectly in the Constitution. These guys were just a bunch of men with a vision and I think it's obvious that they didn't want a king or tyrant to ever take control of America.

@SamlovesLulu

2 ай бұрын

Or a single mad, tyrannical party. Like the democrats, for example.

Isn't the President the top of the military officers - the "commander in chief"

@randalll1420

3 ай бұрын

No

@SamlovesLulu

2 ай бұрын

@@randalll1420 Correct.

The commentator in the video only talked about what Trump’s lawyers are arguing. What are the plaintiff lawyers’ arguments?

I think this issue should have been explored before it got to this point. It would have been easier for everyone if these issues had been explored in 1898 after the coup d'etat in Wilmington, North Carolina. It might have forced people to rethink racial issues of the time and held some of the people who were responsible for it accountable. Instead the people in office looked away and ignored it, even after the victims pleaded for help and one of them met with the president. What happened in Wilmington in 1898 was wrong and they never addressed it. Now it's coming back to haunt us all.

@25jessieg

3 ай бұрын

Don't hold your breath for The New Yorker. Condé Nast publishes the New Yorker. Advance Publications owns Condé Nast, as well as other publications, such as Discovery Channel and Wired; it is the majority shareholder in Reddit. Advance Publications, Inc. is owned by Donald Newhouse and S.I. Newhouse Jr.

@smolderingtitan

3 ай бұрын

@@25jessieg did you major in non-sequiturs? That was state of the art.

@swaminic

3 ай бұрын

This is helpful context. Thanks.

@davidthompson7817

3 ай бұрын

@@smolderingtitan Minored in word salad.😂

Thank you. Very well done explanation.

We are awaiting anxiously for SCOTUS decision on the 14th amendment .

So a person who caused an insurrection and didn’t take the oath, can run for president?

@patricelabelle1386

3 ай бұрын

Yes. The Amendment, unfortunately, only applies to people who have already taken an oath to support the Constitution. It applies to all "offices of public trust" in any state and to all federal positions. He can't even be on a school board or city council.

I think they will overturn the decision. However, they are likely to reject his other appeals.

Are we searching for justic or are we looking for excuses. When it comes to the 14th ammnedment why was it even written? Use your heads.

The CEO/President of any company is an officer of that institution. Period. Anyone who has held that role understands this responsibility.

great video

it's a complete debacle, if you can' see how bad this person is and remove him, then I guess you deserve what will happen.

Amy shares a calm voice of reason.

aren't there a number of fairly recent cases that have been decided by the 14th amend. section 3? why can't we look into those?

"What if he's on the ballot in some states and not others...?" Umm, ask every single "Third Party" candidate that has ever run for President how they feel about that. Since the Rethuglican lawyers has some strange ideas they can be assigned to ask the dead ones. The Constitution INTENTIONALLY delegates that to the States and EXPECTS inconsistency-it is a feature and NOT A BUG.

@starfishsystems

3 ай бұрын

Moreover, the Supreme Court recently overturned Roe v Wade, ruling that each State shall have independent jurisdiction on this literally life or death matter. Apparently such variance between States is constitutionally mandated. It's pretty hard to turn around and find grounds now to argue that it somehow isn't with respect to an already established State electoral mandate.

"It all depends on what the meaning of 'is' is." - Bill Clinton. Nitpicking semantics in law infuriates me.

The problem with the criminal justice system is that courts keep dumbing down common sense or cut and dry crimes with legalese that make little sense.

Interesting times our Democracy faces.... huh? 🤔

@emead528

3 ай бұрын

Danger

He should be disqualified!

@randalll1420

3 ай бұрын

Absolutely

@Theprincess420

3 ай бұрын

Nope ain’t happening

@pb5640

3 ай бұрын

@@Theprincess420 is a trumptard

@pb5640

3 ай бұрын

@@Theprincess420 we’ll see.

Thank you.

Awesome communication ...

If you get as far as the Electoral College, that is the juncture at which the hi-jinx started in 2020. With gerrymandering as just one instance of how the landscape has changed in favor of one party over another, the possibility of another attempt is quite real!

Interesting conversation but all the camera angles made me dizzy.

@emmgeevideo

3 ай бұрын

They must have used an intern. Very amateurish.

Thank you, I 🤔

ridiculous play of words

Yes

Can’t run if he’s dead !!

@randalll1420

3 ай бұрын

Well said Mr Moto!You are spot on 😊

@Theprincess420

3 ай бұрын

😂 well he’s alive get over it

@MrMoto289

3 ай бұрын

@@Theprincess420 you better smoke one princess 420

When does the expert arrive?

The spirit of the law, or the letter of the law. It is time for an American reading of "ambiguity".

Bigtime hairsplitting. At least the Constitution is being studied.

according to the constitution.... HE IS!!

Ohh, what a sair fect.

Normal American hairsplitting. Forked tongues.

Hes unfit to lead our country

@Theprincess420

3 ай бұрын

Joe? I agree

Is he disqualified? That's a question that doesn't need to be debated. A second grader riding the short bus knows the answer to that. Women the terms are clear he's disqualified. Now, lets talk about something else.

Insurrection… OR REBELLION isn’t what he did a rebellion

91 felonies. That it enough to disqualify him

While I am glad for this post, I believe that the SCOTUS should disqualify 45 based on the insurrectionist provisions of the US Constitution. The Colorado Court found that 45 incited the insurrection. The exact words in presidential oath don't matter. If you are in office because of the Constitution, you can't be permitted to hold office if you seek to set it aside by an insurrection or unconstitutional means. Otherwise there would be an absurd result.

Bullies pretending that a liar criminal insurrectionist or a fryer talking change that inciting planning participating in insurrection , interfering with a function of government pertains to anything else is lying. Frying is manipulative self abuse. Stop .

Meh

The devil can interpret the Bible as he does the laws

When the State(s) conduct the election, who else would be in a position within the election process to adjudicate and enforce a disqualification? Nobody is talking about that matter.

how to speak for 6:49...... and say nothing

@Alltime2050

3 ай бұрын

It's strange how a certain type of person can totally ignore everything that was said and pretend they didn't hear it. That explains a lot about his fan base.

Support hold up bear carry prop up keep up bolster up brace shore up underpin buttress reinforce 2. help aid assist contribute to give a donation to give money to back underwrite subsidize fund finance succour bankroll champion

Wishful thinking.

You all talk too much on the rest of the world's dime.

The founding fathers were very clear in this. We elect kings.

@FakingANerve

3 ай бұрын

What? No. Quite the opposite - they explicitly formed the government in response to their disdain of the monarchy, not to mimic it.

@JJLom777

3 ай бұрын

​@@FakingANerve No disrespect. As, subtext can be a tricky thing. But, I believe the writer was using irony.

She was just repeating headlines without taking the discourse any further. No additional insights or facts, nor any contextual facts that might bring it all together.

@thisiscait

3 ай бұрын

Were we watching the same video..?

You already lost this one

Unsubscribed.

@Alltime2050

3 ай бұрын

No one outside of the cult cares what a cultist thinks beyond the threat they pose.

@sparrowhk

3 ай бұрын

Bye 👋

@AE-bm4no

3 ай бұрын

Are you tired of winning?

@thisiscait

3 ай бұрын

This is not an airport, you do not need to announce your departure.

@clevelandplonsey7480

3 ай бұрын

Seems like 11 people agree with me. I’m cheerful. ☺️

The New Yorker??? The New Yorker??? The New Yorker??? When did they stop talking about how wonderful the LGBTQ+ is???

@marvinmartin4692

3 ай бұрын

That’s it. Remain ignorant!

@QUICKBOOKS1

3 ай бұрын

Dud you watch the video?

Keep in mind this lady is a Journalist. Her explanations for or against any position here is very weak. There's an obvious bias she has that you can observe yourself. I just dislike that she tries to put on a mask of neutrality when its obvious this video has a thesis.

@mariabriolas328

3 ай бұрын

Perfectly said. Even slipped with "CNN" reporting the elections 🙄🙄

@QUICKBOOKS1

3 ай бұрын

@@mariabriolas328 Yes. Everything was clearly stated, and, broken down. No confusion.

My dad was vp New Yorker magazine for years. Unsubscribing! They deleted my first post. Boycott the New Yorker magazine. They, are to liberal. Commies

@marceybull

3 ай бұрын

Say why you think that in relation to this post ... otherwise, what's the point?

@25jessieg

3 ай бұрын

@@marceybull Because they are just another corporate mouthpiece? Condé Nast publishes the New Yorker. Advance Publications owns Condé Nast, as well as other publications, such as Discovery Channel and Wired; it is the majority shareholder in Reddit. Advance Publications, Inc. is owned by Donald Newhouse and S.I. Newhouse Jr.

@godfreycarmichael

3 ай бұрын

Learn English.

@D0praise

3 ай бұрын

Bwahahahaha

@thisiscait

3 ай бұрын

Bye now 👋🏻