Feel like people are talking like Chandler isn't also fighting the most entertaining fighters in the sport, like Dustin and Justin are both guys with all time fights themselves.

Robbie lawler, Carlos condit, prime Anthony pettis, Rampage, derrick Lewis, just to name a few

Real BMF

He could have beat Justin if he was more cautious from the start, he could have beat Dustin if he fought him like he fought Henderson the second time. Not like he doesn't have to power to put those guys out, he starts looping punches in the pocket and doesn't maintain as composed.

Has anybody ever went into the ufc and built a resume of top names this quickly?

It's Nate, Nick, Tony, Charles, Gaethje, Khamzat, Conor and Dustin...They're all like Arturo Gatti and Mickey Ward...

Most entertainer fighter is by a thousand miles McGregor. Hate or love him, whenever he fights, it's always fireworks and people gravitate towards him

Definitely in with a shout. All his losses are foty candidates

Yes

Not at all.

WWG1WGA!

Lmaoo saying that Michael Chandler is the most entertaining fighter in UFC history is the definition of recency bias

@jamiek9780

Жыл бұрын

I mean it’s a subjective opinion, but you can’t tell us that every fight he’s had in the UFC hasn’t been must-see. I’m not a big fan of Chandler since I find him a bit annoying, but his fights have consistently all been bangers. Without fail not a single snooze fest and I don’t see that ever happening. He could make fighting a broomstick look entertaining at this rate.

@ajay7797

Жыл бұрын

@@jamiek9780 yes but he’s only had 4 fights and 3 of them were exciting do you know how many fighters have 7+ exciting fights ??? I could literally name 10 fighters. So No it’s not subjective it’s just wrong