KSP has many glitches and unintended behaviours, but it seems as though the 2 in KSP2 just doubles them.

@of3788

Жыл бұрын

I'm pretty sure that's actually a typo, KSP^2 makes a lot more sence

@BladeScraper

Жыл бұрын

Way too buggy. As per typical for modern game studios, just a cash grab offering it up for early access before it's even close to ready for it. Early access should be, the game is done but you might find a bug or two, not game isn't really done and you will definitely find lots of bugs. And it doesn't even really look much different to the OG game. Certainly not worth the AAA game asking price, even without the bugs.

@carpet3827

Жыл бұрын

@@BladeScraper people need money to develop games and patch bugs, how do you expect the devs to completely finish a game with no income

@maxjohnson403

Жыл бұрын

​@@carpet3827 You just forget they have a whole nother game to pull revenue from?

@LunarMARAUDER

Жыл бұрын

​@@carpet3827No they had money and time they just wanted money

cant wait until ksp2 isnt broken so i can play it without crying

@Goober_____

Жыл бұрын

Softie

@q_nx2321

Жыл бұрын

@@Goober_____ I can't blame him, Its a bad game (but not to the point of crying)

@Goober_____

Жыл бұрын

@@q_nx2321 yeah

@rowbotia

Жыл бұрын

@@q_nx2321 its a joke man nobody gonna cry over ksp

@rowbotia

Жыл бұрын

@@Goober_____ its a joke

Honestly i had a moment where i forgot that Jool was a gas giant, so i thought the title was basically saying "is it possible to build a rover without the kraken attackin in ksp2" lol

@RamanNoodles01

2 күн бұрын

Erm akshually, Jool is the size of earth, so it’s not a gas giant 🤓

the surface can exist however it would not be rigid solid like terrestrial planets it would me more like swimming in syrup, or water since the pressures would be so high the gases would come together making a patch dense enough to act as a fluid so im implying, *you can swim.. in the air*

@Arandomperson28769

Жыл бұрын

what?

@Sledgeskitty

Жыл бұрын

@@Arandomperson28769 it can be possible. Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, could be gaseous ocean worlds where gas acts as a liquid and goes solid as you go deeper

@DoubsGaming

Жыл бұрын

except for the part of, ya know, death?

@IronHexacyanoferrate

Жыл бұрын

In gas vivants you’ll eventually reach a liquid sea of hydrogen and helium, going even deeper you’ll reach a solid core made of solid hydrogen and helium, and hypothetically deep enough you’ll reach a core of metallic hydrogen.

@of3788

Жыл бұрын

@@DoubsGaming Death is a small price to pay for ✨Metalic Hydrogen✨

in the original ksp jool did have a surface at some point before it was removed so it is likely that in a future ksp2 update jool will no longer have a surface.

@Mike-wu5ef

Жыл бұрын

why would they copy early ksp and put a surface in? they put it in as a reference to jools invisible surface that still exists in ksp 1.

@arandomcommenter412

Жыл бұрын

@@Mike-wu5ef Because they just made a regular planet for early release…?

Always mind-melting to see you pushing the boundaries of KSP mechanics ❤ (Again)

I hope they add multiple layers of clouds on Jool before you ultimately get crushed by the pressure, instead of just having a solid surface that fuels my theory that Jool is a post-apocalyptic Earth

5:59 oh no, not the unfortunate shape

@arandomcommenter412

Жыл бұрын

No

Correct me if I'm wrong but i think a plane like a space shuttle would have been easier, because the surface looks flat enough to land on

@montairplane

Жыл бұрын

Perhaps, but Jools atmo is extremely thick so it'd probably rip off the wings and end up crashing into the ground.

@Yutiradon

Жыл бұрын

@@montairplane Wouldn't they only rip off if the pressure changed suddenly? I'm not familiar with how it works in KSP 2 but in KSP 1 pressure limits aren't on by default (to my knowledge at least) so the parts would only fail from dynamic pressure

Reid will stop at nothing to break games

ksp2 moment

Love ur vids keep up 👍

Next - Can You Land a Rover on the Clouds in Kerbal Space Program 2?

"I started to do a gravity turn here" *Automatically shatters like glass*

5:58 careful man

Since kerbals can make it to the surface without dying id love see a jool rescue mission

Have been waitin for this my entire life

Is it even a rover if its on a gas giant

@ReidCaptain

Жыл бұрын

Apparently so

Greetings from Denmark! 🇩🇰

cool

making it land like the an40 was supposed to land might have been a lot easier

A good day when you make a ksp video

It doesn’t seem like the surface has terrain to me, it just has a texture for whatever reason (and collision ofc)

@1000-THR

6 ай бұрын

do you know if the texture is unique

@oberonpanopticon

6 ай бұрын

@@1000-THR No idea I wouldn’t be surprised if it was just a green coloured retexture placeholder thing

The fact jool has lighter gravity than kerbin

I couldn't imagine I would live to the age when kerbonauts would CANONICALLY land on jool

yeah, try launching off from the surface of jool

Has anyone seen Reid Captain and Nilered in the same room? They have an eerily similar cadence and tone

That’s certainly an unconventional way to go about it lol

do you know how to fix the low fps when looking down at any celestial body (Kerbin, the Mun, etc.)? It’s so bad

yay

@ReidCaptain

Жыл бұрын

Yippee

@generallyunimportant

Жыл бұрын

@@ReidCaptain yahoo

that landing system is so overkill lol. the rover is so light and wheels have such a high inpact tolerance that is can land on its own, or just attach an inflatable heatshield for some extra drag if you really want

In KSP 1 get a Class E asteroid in to orbit of gilly

3:50 you say that while the game perfectly execute a third axis flip haha not Copter related, but really cool!

Videos Idea: saving the jool kerbin

brb mom, gonna go set up an interplanetary base on jupiter

Great job, now send a rover to Sun

5:59 i almost had a heart attack

I challenge you to land on gilly only using vernor engines (KSP 1)

Next video:making logic gates in poly bridge

i think that even Jupiter has some surface because its gasses compressed into a surface

You should have kept the smaller grid find on top and kept it like that

tomfoolery

Oh, jool used to have a surface in the original game too, don't know why they removed it but I'm glad to see they added it back in

@new_simsons

25 күн бұрын

Because it's a gas giant

@thebrandunsafeone7184

25 күн бұрын

@@new_simsons yeah, but it's funny

I think a glider would’ve been the best way to do this

Please make a bipedal mechanical walker in this game which can be piloted by the kerbel

Reid, would you consider doing builds in Legends of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom?

You could make a rover that can't fall over

7:18 Normally, this wouldn't work with such a thick atmosphere

5:59 imagine if he added a fourth fin here

wait so is there not air brakes in ksp 2?

wait why did you even add the landing gear

I'm pretty sure Jool actually has less gravity than Kerbin. It does in the first game at least (0.8g), and I don't see why that'd be changed in the second - orbital velocity is higher not because there's a higher surface gravity but because it's at a larger radius. If you think about how an orbit is essentially falling and missing the ground, you've got to miss by a lot more to avoid hitting something bigger. And Jool *does* have more *mass*, it's just that gravity falls off with distance and so at its larger radius you feel less of it

@Pantomas-PG

11 ай бұрын

Wrong: Low orbits are fast while Hig Orbits are slow

@warriorsabe1792

11 ай бұрын

​@@Pantomas-PG That's only true if you consider the exact same central object for both. For example, Methone orbits Saturn at nearly twice the velocity the space station does Earth, even though Saturn's surface gravity is about the same as the Earth's and Methone's orbit is 30x wider than the ISS. The reason for this can be thought of as coming from the fact Saturn has more mass despite having the same gravity, but it can also be thought of as coming from the larger radius in the way I described previously.

Watching you fall into that gas giant triggers some uncomfortable feelings in me, and i don't know how to explain it

Less parachutes may actually work better. You would have a higher speed through the atmosphere and that extra speed could cause the parachuted to deploy properly

@rorybaker5799

6 ай бұрын

Nvm. You proved that wouldn’t work later lol.

5:58 bro did a 3 spoke forbhidden sign 💀

I really need to get this game.

@sultanofswag8901

11 ай бұрын

Don't, get KSP1 the sequel is a buggy mess

See how fast you can launch a lone kerbal

Now, this is actually kinda logical; gas giants are believed to have a solid core.

@user-tc4hi7dn1q

Жыл бұрын

Well, it's really not, because it is believed thet gas giants turn from gas to liquid to solid, and diving into it will destroy you becouse on the "surface" of gas giant pressure is kazillion atmospheres and temperature is thousands (probably) of degrees

@fissis1955

Жыл бұрын

i dont think thats any close to the core

@tales9476

Жыл бұрын

While gas giants do *likely* have solid cores - they are also *much* farther down than Jool's surface. Furthermore, they are likely well below a thick ocean of supercritical fluid. The pressure and temperature at the surface of a gas giant would rip apart and melt even the hardiest of alloys and composites we have discovered. So, for all intents and purposes, it is not possible to land on the surface of a gas giant.

@MaximTheRussianGuy

Жыл бұрын

@@tales9476they need to add this in KSP2

"local billionaire makes awkwardly shaped rocket powered by Decouplers to fly to nearby planet, killing hundreds of Kerbins test after test "

r.i.p reid captain gpu

i... uh... i mean, i guess i can't be mad at you because it worked... but that was... certainly kerbal

i think it is a compressed hydrogen ocean

Dumb question but...if the atmosphere is that soupy could a plane not have worked as a lander like the space shuttle but designed for soup? Genuinely no idea.

now get the kerbal BACK

So, what was the "hidden secret?" The planet having a surface?

the surface of jool actually looks really cool. i wonder if they'll add more stuff on it?

@Intelligentmoron

Жыл бұрын

I really think it’s just a placeholder wouldn’t make much sense to add a surface to a gas giant

@wegner7036

11 ай бұрын

@@Intelligentmoron Gas giants do have solid cores, though. Just not possible for any machine to survive the intense weather what with the pressure so extreme gas becomes indistinguishable from liquid and wind strong enough to rip up mountains.

@Intelligentmoron

11 ай бұрын

@@wegner7036 yes but that would be much further in jool then it’s showing here plus, I think it would be more realistic with the ksp1 solution of crushing your rocket before you touch any thing

@merp9610

11 ай бұрын

@@Intelligentmoron If they added in specialized parts for the pressure, theoretically you could have an ocean-like area, with the gaseous clouds turning into a liquid hydrogen and helium sea. That's about as far down as you'd be able to go though, I don't think, even stretching it that far, that you'd ever reach the metallic hydrogen core.

@Intelligentmoron

11 ай бұрын

@@merp9610 I will admit, that would be cool and also more realistic then just surface

Bump

MAKE THE PANELS A SWASTIK-

5:59 🚆😳🚆🚆🚆🚆🚆🚆🚆🚆🚘🚆oh🚗🚅🚅🚅🚅🚅🚅🚅

@jenniferkemp2337

Жыл бұрын

-the heck?!?!

I have a teory why there is a surface on jool and i thinck that the surface is actually is core becouse even your gas giant as a solid core

5:59 Ahem... quiet sus...

This game needs something akin to FFT to optimize it

I have an idea! Send the rover in the thumbnail to Jool.

hi

@ReidCaptain

Жыл бұрын

Hi

Now recover the rover

Why’d they add a surface to jool

@Damian-cilr2

Жыл бұрын

Heck if i know.

Why they name the smoke planet juul though

@jenniferkemp2337

Жыл бұрын

j-O-O-l is how you spell it

off brand nile red but good vid

so, why didn't you just use thrusters?

if the atmosphere is so thick, why didn't you just put on some wings and glide down?

11:52 Bruh whats the point of landing legs if you decouple them

try and colinize minmus

@mikeelward3296

11 ай бұрын

PLEAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Couldn’t you have used jet engines to slow down? Jool has a huge thick atmosphere, then again I only tried it in ksp1 I don’t have ksp2

@nether_bat

Жыл бұрын

no oxygen to power the jet engines

@of3788

Жыл бұрын

@@nether_bat also wouldn't you need the intakes on the same side as the engines? That's just cursed

3:37 why are you become FAN

Make a ssto

why not use a rocket to land? what am i missing?

bro make a plane

So jool is not a gas planet?

Do I keep hearing "years" instead of "meters" or is it just me?

Why do you have to sound like that chemist

why not just make a plane/ssto and land it like a plane

Reid have my kidney ❤

:)

Hi.

Make more ksp2

@ReidCaptain

Жыл бұрын

I'll try, every video takes forever to record though since things always get buggy

@ThomasWinget

Жыл бұрын

@@ReidCaptain I appreciate that you (and others) are like...reverse coal-mine canaries, in a way. That is to say, when the time comes that I don't see a reply like this I'll know that it's safe to try KSP2. xD

"and its gravity is a lot higher" well at least in KSP1 its actually less than kerbin at 0.8G, although I dont know if this is changed for ksp2, although it most likely isnt bc it would mean different orbital speeds for the moons which would be different

ah good, they added secrets but only 3% of steam users can run the game to find them

Why dont you use rockets to slow you down, like every real life spaceship.

🅱️OVER

Why didn't you just make a space plane to land there? I'm sure you could strap a rover on it.