60 years old and still doing mighty fine...! Just like Johnny Walker...When something is well made, it will stand the passing of time and live on. Hats off to the German engineers who built it.

@bestopinion9257

Ай бұрын

It has a purpose because destroys shitty drones with low cost. The face of the battlefield and the tools of the enemy made it relevant.

@hotdog9262

11 күн бұрын

@@bestopinion9257 it can hit and destroy missiles, planes, helicopters, drones, land vehicles and personnel.. and it have

@bestopinion9257

10 күн бұрын

@@hotdog9262 The problem was, Patriot ammo is expensive. Russians used to send dirt cheap drones to deplete Patriot ammunition and then send expensive missiles. This equipment solves exactly that problem: a cheap solution for cheap drones, and let Patriot deal with planes, jets and whatever expensive and advanced tools you want.

@hotdog9262

10 күн бұрын

@@bestopinion9257 yup 550bucks per shell. missiles like you stated are expensive

Gepard is design against low flying aircarft initially but when jdam came in, gepard purpose seem no longer need… and even germany goverment want to abandoned this system… but the warfare is also change when low and slow flying drone does more damage, it once again proved that this system is still relevant

One should not forget why the Gepard was developed in the 1960s and what its actual task was, namely to advance with tank units and protect them against attack helicopters and low-lying fighter aircraft such as the SU-25 Froogfoot. What he's dealing with now in Ukraine are easy targets for the Gepard's abilities, like on a practice shooting range. Slow drones or cruise missiles that don't even change course when attacked. The Gepard's radar is still so good at detecting a single bird. A soldier with a Stinger may have a longer range, but he has no radar to detect incoming targets early, and there is no antidote to the Gepard's 35mm shells, only good luck not to get hit...

@rainbowseeker5930

8 ай бұрын

So true...

@simonschneider5913

2 ай бұрын

consumes way too much ammo - according to ukrainians.

Gepard is one of my favorite vehicles, one of very few, and it is cool to see it live up to its full potential :)

@user-wv1pj6wh4h

11 ай бұрын

its a nice target.

@user-wv1pj6wh4h

11 ай бұрын

hit the radar and the front detection ssytem with a rifle it will be blind mma dn crew will runa way CRAP

@BinaryKiller_Recoded

11 ай бұрын

@@user-wv1pj6wh4h Hehe, except that it is a really good anti tank against modern vehicles :)

@sebasstein7014

9 ай бұрын

​@@user-wv1pj6wh4hA gepard could annihilate any infantry or even armored vehicle. First of all it is an AA gun so not used on the front and if you get close, good luck facing two 35mm auto cannons with your rusty Ak47. A truly equal match....not.

Could be very cost effective against drones. Added bonus: it has a Star Wars type of look and vibe from certain angles 🙂

@darrenskjoelsvold

11 ай бұрын

You mean "from a certain point of view."

@rusticbox9908

11 ай бұрын

The problem with drones are their size and the height they operate at. They fly too low and slow the computer often discard their return signal as background noise.

@darrenskjoelsvold

11 ай бұрын

@@rusticbox9908 or possibly they are mistaken for a bird. The small drones are around the size of a bird after all.

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

@@rusticbox9908 Many of these problems are a result of the parameters of the various Filters. For instance there is the Doppler filter which can measure movement in certain directions (not tangentialy) by measuring phase change. Then there is the audio filter which as the radar emits say 10000 pulses/second detects the audio frequencies from propellers, rotors, jet engine turbines, fans and bird wings. Then there is the Moving Target Indicator. This is done by subtracting a memory recording of a pulse return from the current pulse return. Thus if the target has changed distance or moved out of the beam it shows up. All this used to be done in the 1940s with acoustic dleay line memory. Finally it is possible to record the background clutter in each sweep or rotation and not the differences when a target moves in. Modern digital memory makes this easier. A electronically scanned system that can scan both vertically and to each side can also detect movement much better. -Detecting micro drones is mainly hard because the radars haven't been parameterized. -The new special radars 9which already exist to protect sporting venues and air ports from drones) will be able to detect and destroy micro drones.

@rusticbox9908

11 ай бұрын

@@williamzk9083 I know this, but micro drones are just flying way too low and their returns are indistinguishable from the background noises and Filtered out, the radar will need further upgrades going into higher bands requiring more power. The pansirs didn't have this problem in the middle east because of the terrain but faced the same problems In Ukraine.

This only proves that the Gepard was built with technology so ahead of its time.

This design is proving itself against the test of time. This brings to mind the M2 50 caliber machine gun which was developed for WWI. The US Army tried to make their own vehicle like this but it could never successfully complete its tests. As long as the radar systems are upgraded when needed this weapon could stay in the field for many years. I could also see the German Army reintroducing this weapon back into its army. No one saw its usefulness against drones, cruise missiles or low flying aircraft. Very impressive.

@HedgehogZone

11 ай бұрын

Nah we have already a better system. Skyranger!

@BlueRice

10 ай бұрын

radar has always been the challenging aspect of a detection system. if the radar cant detect small drone, its not useful at all. there are even smaller drone the U.S used. its small as your palm of your hand. this is very challenging for any radar system. if you can spot the enemies, sending missile on the way is hard task to stop - even artillery shell. modern warfare fight with these type of things that is cheap and effective. gorilla warfare is with a country that has no advance technologies so its battle is mostly with assault rifle and sniper.

@rainbowseeker5930

8 ай бұрын

@@HedgehogZone - Are you sure it has an advantage in terms of costs/benefits ratio...?

you may call it "old". but do not call it "unsophisticated". it is the most sophisticated tank ever produced in germany and it was the most expensive vehicle of the german bundeswehr. the german crews of gepard were known to be the most skilled and best trained tank crews ever. having a gepard as opponent means to be under fire of merciless precision, at least three seconds after being identified. if the word "sophisticated" didn't exist, we would have to invent it, to describe the properties of gepard.

Er hat eine Menge Leben gerettet. Das erfüllt er erfolgreich. Das sollte man nicht vergessen.

@Orgelfan62

4 ай бұрын

Und erfüllt immer noch seine Aufgaben. Die Russen fürchten den wie damals den Tiger1

At 05:30, it's not the engine of the Gepard or Leopard 1, it's a V16 turbo diesel powering boats, locomotives, generators, etc. Sources should be checked before posting anything online.

@hotdog9262

11 күн бұрын

10 cyl MTU multifuel diesel. 37.4 liter. more or less the 10cyl version of leopard 2s 12cyl

As a war thunder player, I hate this vehicle

0:38 just 4 fun: FLAK is a German acronym FL(ugzeug) = Airplane A(bwehr) = defense K(anone) = Canon ___ Panzer = Tank

I need one for home defense

Was until yesterday ) But send some more, to check it out...

wow that thing is awesome!

Can these guns with the right ammunition, damage a MBT armor?

@HenkGoesBad

11 ай бұрын

Gepards' 35x228mm has a APDS (Armor Piercing Discarding Sabot) version. While it is not a tank buster by any means, it has a decent penetration of 65mm at 1.000m. It could be unpleasant for older tanks side armor (early T-72's at best) at close range but would fare well against anything lighter (AFV's, IFV's etc). I'm not sure if it can cause significant spalling in newer tanks, but it could still destroy optics and achieve a mission-kill rather than a hard-kill. In practice, Gepards only carried a handful of these rounds (20-40) as a last-ditch self defense. If your Gepard comes face to face with a tank, something has gone very wrong already.

@neutraluser4019

11 ай бұрын

@HenkGoesBad Thanks, I guess for IFV, AFV or even Gepards to destroy any modern tanks would need to be equipped with ATGM otherwise avoid it. 😉

@HenkGoesBad

11 ай бұрын

@@neutraluser4019 That's pretty much what I would think indeed! It would not surprise me if a newer version of the Gepard would include an ATGM for self defense since they would be operating close to the front line, chasing drones.

@JoaoSoares-rs6ec

11 ай бұрын

Whit armour piercing munitions yes it can

This entire script sounds like it was written by ChatGPT lmao

Game changer... again?

I believe a side-by-side comparison between the Gepard and multi-barreled anti-air Russian-made vehicles would be quite interesting! Would this channel please do this! Also, how much 35mm ammo does this weapon system carry? Would a similar system using quad-50BMG or dual/quad 20mm rounds be more effective, especially against drones which have much less capacity than combat aircraft?

Saw a video couple of days ago 2 Gepards hit by a Lancet 1 of the gepard seems to have suffer massive damage

@user-wv1pj6wh4h

11 ай бұрын

i hae a friend that shot 2 with kornets..

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

Non existent videos. One video of a Geppard stationary in the middle of the field abandoned. Doesn’t make any sense. Likely a decoy

@klaabu99

10 ай бұрын

there is video where lancet 3 hitting gepard with minor damage ... and u say that lancet 1 with 1kg warhed did massive damage ... lol

@ruhtraeregel

10 ай бұрын

@@klaabu99 Depends where. And there is two versions of lancets.

@ruhtraeregel

10 ай бұрын

If lancets can take out bradleys and leopards which is visually verified it can take a thin skin gephard. Sometimes you get lucky. Sometimes you dont.

Yes it is... How many you got?

Gets the job done on a budget!

Alt aber oho. Ohne geht nix für den Rest! Das Problem ist halt der Unterhalt! Auch die Doppelkanone macht voll Sinn! 🤗

They are talking about cost effectiveness and the same time they forgot to mention shortage of ammo for gepard gun, I wander how many rounds does it take to take down cheap drone or lancet what is the cost of Russian/Iran shahid or Russian lancet drone compare to say 50 rounds

@HedgehogZone

11 ай бұрын

Nah, new ammunition is nonstop produced for a few months already!

@HedgehogZone

11 ай бұрын

And it only take 3-6 rounds for a drone! Withn 50 rounds it would be able to down even an hypersonic missle, which it already have done so!

@milangacik994

10 ай бұрын

Shaheed 20000 USD. 50 German rounds 10000 USD... Nazi´s does not have enough ammunition and Fritzes production capability is in tatters as said their top witch of European Union...

@bananian

8 ай бұрын

Like 3 bullets? There's literally a video showing a gepard easily downing the shitter drones.

At 02:44, that's a Leo 2.

@WesenAusHanikasKommentaren

10 ай бұрын

Who asked?

I’m confused is this an analysis or a commercial for Gepard manufacturer lol

Wouldn't a none armoured version be better if its a drone killer, it would then be a lot cheaper and faster

@tonytaskforce3465

5 ай бұрын

More vulnerable also tracked vehicles go anywhere.

This machine needs a upgrade. And it was mentioned with the stinger missiles. Which would give the gepard a longer reach. Question is why don't the germans do it by going into a partnership with one of the European countries like they have done with aircraft.

@rolandxor179

11 ай бұрын

There is a C-RAM system called MANTIS that could potentially be modified to work on a mobile chassis. But the reason there is no upgrade is because this system is supposedly very complex and expensive to maintain. It is not like a relatively simple MANPAD which has largely replaced it.

@rolandxor179

11 ай бұрын

There is a huge interest in making all air defense mobile. As static systems are just very vulnerable to counter battery fire or anti radiation drones and missiles.

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

The replacement system is “SkyNEX” of which two prototypes have already been delivered to Ukraine. It looks like MANTIS but is new. It’ll be mounted on a 6x6 armoured truck or a BOXER 8x8 IFV. It has provision for any MANPADS on the side turret. SkyNEX has special radar to track and target swarming micro drones . With maybe a RBS70 missile it’ll reach to over 8km. -The Germans are developing the LFK NG missile which is in essence a 1/4 sized vertical launched IRIS/T. The missiles and radar will be in seperate vehicles easy to hide. A Wiesel tracked vehicle if it passes over grass leaves no tracks after 1.5 hours.

@rolandxor179

11 ай бұрын

@@williamzk9083 I looked it up but it isn't as mobile it works with a static radar housed in a seperate container. I think the best integration would be on a Lynx or Puma IFV and then like the Gepard / Cheetah it will need a search and tracking radar attached.

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

@@rolandxor179 Technically the SkyNEX, Sjyguard, Skyshiel are elements and variants of the same system. My bad, What I wanted to refer to was SkyRanger 30 and SkyRanger 35 which is the mobile version system for use on a Boxer IFV. In this system the 5 AESA antenna are integrated around the turret able to track microdrones to 5km. The SkyNEX system purchased by Qatar is extremely capable and able to handle 80 simultaneous targets with its guns and missiles.

Nice i want it❤

gepard got nothing on tunguska.

Effective to hoga pur dusri dar se jada chulne nahi diyaja

Computer narration sucks.

Very expensive to get and to use. Given the overwhelming presence of drones on the horizon this vehicle isn't practically priced to purchase or to use. For that matter, given german engineering complexity, even to maintain.

@sebasstein7014

9 ай бұрын

The complete opposite of what you just said is actually the case. Because Gepard is so much cheaper than wasting a missile against a cheap drone it makes the gepard so cost effective. Because there are so many drones nowadays. How can you get it that backwards?

@bananian

8 ай бұрын

Aren't these equipment getting retired anyway? How would they be expensive? Takes 3 bullets to take down Puta's Shitter drones. Hope Puta waste more money buying those Shitter drones. 😂😂🤡🤡

@hotdog9262

11 күн бұрын

this is a weapon of war. not a consumer product produced to make money. the cost of a shell is ~550bucks. bit cheaper then a million dollar missile

"Gephard" big oof

Had Tamiya model catalog when i was a boy, the Gepard and A10 warthog were my favourite as they looked so bad ass.

I cannot tell yet. Maybe it is. So far i saw one video, proving the Lancet-3 was more effective, than the Gepard. Lancet-3 - Gepard 1 : 0

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

The footage of the Lancet strike on a Gepard is suspicious. A stationary Geppard, guns aside as if abandoned, radar not turning in the middle of an huge open field. No attempt at concealment. Gepard radar works on the move. This was either a decoy or it had broken down. The Ukrainians say the Gepard was damaged not destroyed. I suspect it was one of those Czech made decoys.

@jozseftoth9368

11 ай бұрын

@@williamzk9083 possible

@Reflect02

11 ай бұрын

​@@williamzk9083once its rada destroy, it become useless gun, these machice very vulnerable, dont believe ukr too much, if what they said are true, they now already being parade on red square

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

@@Reflect02 the Geppard also has a laser range finder. It does not need the tracking radar. In any case the Gepards are being used to protect Ukrainian cities and infrastructure well away from the front line because their range is too short. They easily can destroy several of the Shahad drones at minimal cost. They will easily handle any Kalibr missile that ventures within 3km. A set of 34 Gepards set 5km apart will create a 170km barrier to Russian cruise missiles. The Gepards are well away from the front lines MANPADS which have twice the range provide the initial defence there. There is no realist threat from Russian radar homing missiles which are too primitive so long as radar use is disciplined. Prior to their mothballing the German army had developed a system for attaching MANPADS to the side of various types to extend range. With RBS70 this would be 8km. The bulky lightly armoured Pantsir is more vulnerable, all SHORAD are.

@opinionatedpossum1945

11 ай бұрын

You miss the point. Gepards have shot down hundreds of Iranian drones and Russian cruise missiles. But no weapon has magical powers where it can never be hit. Jets get shot down. Choppers get shot down. Tanks and IFVs get hit. This is called WAR. What matters are relative loss-rates. Gepard is a champ!

There are footage of a lancet drone taking down a gepard.

@opinionatedpossum1945

11 ай бұрын

So what? Did someone tell you there are vehicles that are somehow invincible in war? Where do you learn these strange ideas?

I really wish the British had a system like this. We only had the Stormer and it just wasn't the same beast!

This system is better than any similar, but inferior, Russian air defense system. Russia's equipment is failed tech.

@user-yd4lj4ue7d

11 ай бұрын

Lancet 😊

@archyology

11 ай бұрын

It's widely acknowledged that Russian's ground based anti-air is the best in the world.

@canemcave

11 ай бұрын

​@@archyology Russian's ground based anti-air is junk, and it has been demonstrated consistently, with all sort of facilities (depots, ships, fuel storage, etc..) being regularly blown up by air strikes everywhere in the occupied territories as well as Russia itself, and that without Ukrainians having been given a large number of long range missiles. Russians keep deluding themselves that somehow, they are going to come out of this war on top. It's an illusion, Russia will never win this war even if it took 50 years, and it won't. The only thing Russia still has, are stockpiles of junk to forward to get trashed, as well as a large number of men ready to be sent to the slaughter, nothing else, and how they say, quantity is a quality of its own.

@Reflect02

11 ай бұрын

Pansir be like 😂 u need to cope harder to make ukr win

@canemcave

11 ай бұрын

​@@Reflect02 delusional, when their air defense systems are not destroyed, Russians are lucky if they do not get killed by their own air defenses malfunctioning.. Russian Pantsir Missile System Appears to Malfunction in Fiery Video 9/29/22 Ukrainian Artillery Reportedly Destroy Russian Anti-Aircraft System Worth $15M 7/4/22 6 Barnaul-T 9С932-1 automated system for air defence units: (1, destroyed) (2, destroyed) (1, captured) (2, captured) (3, captured) (4, captured) Surface-To-Air Missile Systems (120, of which destroyed: 79, damaged: 14, abandoned: 4, captured: 23) Pantsir S-1 Breaks Down And Gets Destroyed By Ukrainian Artillery The Ukrainian Armed Forces have destroyed a Russian Uragan MLRS and a Pantsir-S1 anti-aircraft gun missile system in southern Ukraine Aug 28, 2022 Ukraine destroys Russian Pantsir-S1 anti-air missile in Bakhmut 2023/06/27 Russia’s ‘On Patrol’ Pantsir-S1 System Destroyed By Ukrainian Military Near Bakhmut May 12, 2023 how many reports do you want to convince you that it's junk?

1/3 of the video is history, another third is technical data and last third is theoretical assumptions about Gepard performance. Not too convincible without actual footage or results of their work.

It's very vulnerable to SEAD with it's ancient systems. There's also barely any ammo for it. The only country who had ammo was Brazil, and they declined to share it.

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

There were 60,000 rounds in Germany and more in other countries. Production has started again and will be delivered by end of July

@noir2559

11 ай бұрын

lol keep dreaming, clearly you don't know how these SPAA works they can turn off their radar anytime anywhere making it invulnerable against SEADs, and Rheinmetal restarted the ammo production for these things,.

@dieterdodel835

10 ай бұрын

@@williamzk9083 ...600.000

Outdated by 1965…American never even fielded theirs as aircraft were to fast by time they were built…repurposed as drone killers …but due to lack of ammo available , as Swiss won’t supply any and amounts neede to kill a small drone won’t last long

@HedgehogZone

11 ай бұрын

Nah germany already massproduces new ammunition! The russians are already pissed because germany sends another 70 to ukraine.

جميل 😍

leopard2 was also considered invincible and what happens? and there is also a s-70 drone

@HedgehogZone

11 ай бұрын

And everyday more and more disgustingly russians die. Im glad that the ukrainians made the world a better place with less russians in it!

Dumbest comment of the day. Why would an anti-aircraft platform operating far behind front lines have to deal with an anti-tank weapon?

@hotdog9262

11 күн бұрын

it was made to among other protect tank formations from airstrikes. but even if it was only used far behind front lines it could still suddenly face an enemy combat vehicle in the chaos of war

Cheez achihe

The Gepards, despite being a 1970s designed system had their fire control and radar upgraded between 2006-2009. They were then retired in 2010 and moth balled. Obvious they are very effective and cost effective against subsonic cruise missiles like Kalibr and the Shahad drones Russia obtained from Iran. The Russian strategy was to terrorise Ukrainians in winter by destroying their gas and electricity supplies at a time freezing to death in an apartment is possible if you are old or ill. To do this they tried saturation attacks to deplete Ukrainian missile defenses. The Gepards can engage drones and cruise missiles cost effectively (at $50/roound). NASAMS and IRIS-T can then take care of the rest leaving only the Kinzahls to be destroyed by the Patriots.

@tomascastillo4676

11 ай бұрын

Jajajajaja Patriot destroying Kinzhal?????

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

@@tomascastillo4676 Kinzhals were destroyed on no less than 3 occasions. The first one was on May 4th 2023 unfortunately revealed by the Kyiv Mayor who showed wreckage (the inner Armour of the ground penetrating nose cone). This alerted the Russians that a Patriot was operational in the area. About a week after that the Orcs attacked the Kyiv airport near where the Patriot Battery was placed. The Patriot revealed a spectacular volume of fire power as the Russians threw a mixture of S-400 and Kinzahls at the area. The attack was defeated. One missile got through but caused no harm, debris cause $5000 in cosmetic damage. A week latter the Patriot battery had been moved and was operational again and destroyed 6 Kinzhals. -It's now illegal to film and post video of the Patriots in operation. Rightfully so. No operational information must be passed back to the Rusky Mir Orcs. -Fanboys of Russian Missiles brought up on a continuous diet of over hyped Russian weapons propaganda are disbelieving that Patriot after 4 major missile upgrades (PAC-1, PAC-2, PAC-3, PAC-4 MSE) and at least 3 radar upgraqdes with many minor ones was able to intercept the vastly exaggerated Kinzhal. The missile was not even hypersonic in its terminal phase as there was no incoming plasma glow. -Although it is heartening that the Ukrainian people have defense against disgusting Russian attacks on their country and people it is disappointing that the capabilities of Patriot was revealed. The system has not even begun to be at its full capability.

@Reflect02

11 ай бұрын

​​@@williamzk9083ice cope, ukr strike down a dive bom and call that a kinzhal, even said what u said are true, that will be a massive opportunity for the american to advertisement and propaganda for thier weapon that they never pass on

@Reflect02

11 ай бұрын

​@@williamzk9083when ukr parade on red square

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

@@Reflect02 I’m inclined to bulldoze red square and plant trees, parks and and low cost housing. This disgusting history must be destroyed. A open space dedicated to shopping and non military parades will be built elsewhere.

The radar will not be able to see a drone made of plastic. At least one Gepard has already been killed by the Lancet

@lethalfang

11 ай бұрын

Just one? Big fucking deal. It's a war.

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

Plastic is highly visible on radar. You need a jaumann absorber and ferrites combined.

@rusticbox9908

11 ай бұрын

​​@@lethalfang It's a big fuking deal when something 1/20th the cost and needs 1/100th man-hours needed to produce takes it out. How many Gepards they got? vs the number of Lancet 3? It'll hurt in the long run by keeping them too far back to be of much use to the assaulting units that desperately need this aircover.

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

@@rusticbox9908 1/ The first thing to note is that the Lancet has a limited range. Most Gepards are protecting cities or power stations are safe from Lancets. 2/ The second thing to note is that the Ukrainians operate Switchblade drones and their own killer drones equally or more effective than Lancet. They've taken out Pantsires, BUK and Strela-10 as well as a range of SP artillery and tanks. 3/ Lancets are being completely jammed in the Kerson region right now which has allowed the Ukrainians Forces to cross the river while Russian forces are overwhelmed byu Ukrainian Artillery i the Area. 4/ Finally Gepard is a 1970s system that received a modest fire control and radar upgrade in 2006. It is not state of the art and can not deal with mini drones like Lancet., It can destroy Shahad drones and Kalibr cruise missiles like a Turkey shoot very cost effectively. 5/ A 2020 version of the Gepard would have a PESA 4D search radar with electronic scanning in height and about 45 degrees to either side. It would be nearly impossible to direction find and detect and it would easily detect and classify swarming drones. The guns would have a programmable air burst to swat targets out of the sky. 6/ That system already exists. Its called SkyNEX. Two prototypes have been delivered to Ukraine already. It will be the end of Lancet once it is produced in enough numbers.

Worse than Tunguska/Pantsir-s systems since they are also armed with anti-air missiles.

which is better pantsir s or gepard ........ let's bomb the comments 🤣🤣🤣

@hotdog9262

11 күн бұрын

your package back from the cleaners just now sir

Game changer? Wishful thinking, it burns like the rest.

Sadly.. It less effective

The russian lancet kamikaze shovel can’t stand in front of Gepard.

@Reflect02

11 ай бұрын

That why gepard god of war being destroy by lancet 😢

NO. NOPE. NAH.

Yes very 😂😂😂

@kaizenomnibiz5383

11 ай бұрын

😅😂🤣

Tunguska is way better.

@mastermariner490

11 ай бұрын

Yes in your gopnik wet dreams

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

Pantsir is the successor to Tunguska. It's essentially like a lot of Russian weapons Pantisr is just a renamed improved version of Tunguska. -Pantsir showed itself ineffective at even maintaining even a lock on the 4 Storm Shadow missiles that put holes in 2 Russian Occupied Road Bridges and one Rail Bridge. The Pantsir missiles achieved nothing and the 30mm cannon even less. At least Gepard has footage of it destroying mulitple Kalibr missiles. Pantsir is a big clumsy 'all in one' target. You can destroy the radar, missiles and launcher, 30mm guns, vehicle and kill the crew with one hit on the over sized and under armored vehicle. The Missiles are probably good at only one thing: high speed long range engagements against helicopters. Only Russian helicopters. Appache Longbows will be safe. Admittedly this type of SHORAD missile is one the West neglected.

@innerlight7018

11 ай бұрын

On which planet?

It is nothing compare to 2K22 Tunguska

@HedgehogZone

11 ай бұрын

Correct, the russian garbage is not goodnenough to compare it with the many times better german tech!

@hotdog9262

11 күн бұрын

kids like vehicles with bigger numbers. biggabetta!

Are you serious 😂.....who ever person behind this military TV channel have almost 00 knowledge about military equipment and current situation of Ukraine - Russia conflict 😅

@m1910rcb

11 ай бұрын

Care to enlighten us with your all-knowing sources? What is the actual combat history of Gepard?

@bananian

8 ай бұрын

Yeah because you are the expert, right? 😂😂🤡🤡

Yeah but Ukraine already has better AA like Buk or Tor which have dual canons and missile launchers 🙄

Dude!! You are delusional 😢😮😅

How many gepards have ukraine got ? So if they had 50 , and 40,000 rounds will be delivered to ukraine by the end of this year . That's 800 rounds each . They fire aprox 500 rounds in a min. So that's 110 seconds of fire for each gepard ukraime Someone is pulling a fast one here and supporting reds.about 16million quids worth ???? That's what the uk pay for 3 days to house illegal immigrants in hotels

@bananian

8 ай бұрын

Oh shut up and get denazified.

@stefansaathoff2952

6 ай бұрын

500 Schuss pro Minute pro Lauf....1000 pro Minute sind möglich, da in den Millisekunden Feuer-Pause jeweils der andere Lauf schießt

@user-di1rj2be7w

6 ай бұрын

In duel mode yes but about 40 seconds till ammo used lol. So that would 220 seconds in duel fire mode. For each gep , that's less then 4 mins per gep 😂😂

@stefansaathoff2952

6 ай бұрын

@@user-di1rj2be7w es gibt ja noch die Einstellungen ,, Einzel, Kurz, Begrenzt mit 10 Schuss pro Lauf, Normal mit 12 Schuss und Dauer da wären theoretisch 550 pro Lauf möglich. Naja ein tolles und gefürchteter Flugabwehrpanzer bleibt er trotz seines Alters alle mal. Und ich gehe davon aus das alle 90 Stück, von ehemaligen 420 die wir in der Bundeswehr mal hatten, noch im Ausmusterung Depot stehen. Alle anderen gingen auch in anderen Länder.

All of these weapons have not been tested in a real war

@opinionatedpossum1945

11 ай бұрын

They are in a real war now. And they work great!

@m1910rcb

11 ай бұрын

The whole video is about the weapon's current exceptional service in a real war...

@stefansaathoff2952

6 ай бұрын

Sie waren schon weltweit in vielen Krisen und Kriegsgebieten im Einsatz....

Can't stand up to the Russian Kornet-D system

@lethalfang

11 ай бұрын

It's not the job of a anti-aircraft gun to take a hit from a ATGM.

@jra5816

11 ай бұрын

What were you expecting? It was designed as an anti-aircraft weapon, not as a punching bag for ATGMs. And it's not like the Kornet could do the job of the Gepard, either.

@stephengross4704

11 ай бұрын

That is what happens when you operate to close to the front. You need protection to make sure ATGMs are dealt with.

@JoaoSoares-rs6ec

11 ай бұрын

It doesn't needs to deal with the kormet, just has to deal with the crew operating it, why do you think tanks have machine guns

@petrilofberg1758

11 ай бұрын

Neither can pantsir take a hit from a tow missile whats your point?

This is propaganda channel 🤣 If Ukraine air defence is so good how Russian helicopters are flying unchecked????

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

The Gepards are being used mainly to destroy shahad drones and kalibr cruise missiles to protect the civilian population. The range of the guns is 3.5km only though firing can commence at 4km so it’s not enough to shoot down an attack helicopter using missiles with twice this range. The Gepards so-round cities or are back out of range of Russian artillery but provide MANPADS operators of warning. Yes they are limited in range but the are cost effective at stopping cruise missiles

This is a 1970s weapon that Will face the same fate as Leopard tanks...total disaster. Lancet drones will destroy them quickly.

@m1910rcb

11 ай бұрын

Dozens have been in service for about half a year by now. How many losses? 1, 2? Still waiting for "total disaster" lol

@tomascastillo4676

11 ай бұрын

@@m1910rcb Ukraine does not expose them in the Main front theaters. They have them in second lines. Same as Challenger tanks. They Know they Will face same fate as Leopard tanks and Bradleys.

@HedgehogZone

11 ай бұрын

And everyday more and more disgustingly russians die. Im glad that the ukrainians made the world a better place with less russians in it!

@bananian

8 ай бұрын

Keep up the cope. I love it. Ukrainians already breaking through the defense line as we speak. Get rekt, mate.

@tomascastillo4676

8 ай бұрын

@@bananian You have been saying that speech for months. Ukraine is already defeated and only because of nato +150 billion dollars support they continue this nonsense. More than 500 youths have died. An entire generation lost.

Almost all Gepard were destroyed by russian drones

@bananian

8 ай бұрын

Oh yeah and a million f16 shot down too right? 🤡🤡😂😂👌

It's not quick as that of Russian Pantsir

@sumerbc7409

11 ай бұрын

It's faster than Pantsir.

@sirsmeal3192

11 ай бұрын

​@@sumerbc7409They both work well.

@hansrudel5344

11 ай бұрын

@@sumerbc7409 1150 hepard vs 4000 pantsir RPM? gepard is faster?

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

The is video of Gepards shooting down Kalibir cruise missiles. There are pictures of Pantsirs failing to maintain a lock on Storm Shadow cruise missiles. Pantrise is a big cluimsy easy to target system with too many components. Gepards did not work alone, they worked with Roland SHORAD missiles and later Stinger or other MANPADS firing Ozelot Wiesels. The Ozelots had IRST and could engage at night but worked well with the Gepards. The Gepard was retired in 2011 because it was seen as vulnerable but mainly budgetary reasons. -Gepard is highly cost effective at destroying Russian shahad drones and at destroying any kalbr cruise missiles that comes within 3 km. It's pretty much a Turkey shoot.

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

@@hansrudel5344 Gepard shoots a much larger 35mm round than Pantsir's 30mm round. Some of the APDS/T rounds have a mussle velocity of: 1,440 m/s. The Gepards guns shoot at 550 rounds but more modern versions of the 35mm do 1100 rounds. I suggest that Pantsirs 30mm guns have never been of any use.

The junk in Ukraine...

IS nothing for russia😅😅

This has already happened in the history of the wars between Russia and Germany. Then it was the tanks Tiger and Panther. The Germans have no imagination. Russians 80 years ago already defeated the entire family of cats.

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

80 years ago Russia defeated Germany with the help of the USA and UK. In fact Russia would have lost the war without the US and UK. For every 5 T-34 lost the Germans lost less than 3 of their tanks. With 95% of T-34 produced being destroyed then if the Germans had of gotten losses down to 2.5 they would have won the war. The British supplied 4000 tanks before 1942 when the T-34 was total Rubbish whose optics had 30% of the light gathering capability of German optics. Lee Grants, Valiants whose 6 pounder gun out performed the 76mm gun of the T34. The US supplied 4000 M4 Sherman's after 1942. On top of that there were over 600,000 Trucks (200,000 6WD and 400,000 4WD) over 1000 Hurricane and Spitfires (before 1942 was out) and nearly 6000 P-39, thousands B-25 Mitchell's and C-47 Dakotas. -Almost all of the meat in Russian Army Ration Packs was American Meat. Most the of the Aviation fuel was US supplied and 10% total of all fuel was US supplied. -In 1942 at the same time as the German defeat at Stalingrad the British accepted the Surrender of Rommel's army in North Africa. This was as big a loss of men and equipment as Stalingrad and had the Germans not been needing to supply North Africa the Ju 52, Me 323, He 111 and escort fighters could have supplied the Stalingrad airlift. Of course the British did not create conditions of starvation and disease in their POW camps that murdered 95% of their POW like Russia did. -In 1943 the allies invaded Sicily and then Salerno Italy (before D-day) drawing away German resources from Russia. Patrons army got to Czechoslovakia and East Germany before Russia did via Italy. -In 1944 the allies opened up a 3rd front in France at Normandy after having destroyed German oil production in the preceding 5 months. -Had it not been for the allied bombing campaign of Germany which reduced German production by 40% thee would have been 6000 Panthers instead of 4000 produced and they would all have been on the Eastern front instead of Normandy. The same applies to Panzer IV and StuG and Tiger I and II. -The Germans would have had plenty of fuel to outmaneuver Russian tanks. -Hundreds of thousands of German Soldiers kept in France, Italy would have been fighting Russia. Thousands of fighters and bombers used on the Western front would have been used against Russia. -Oh and it was Ukrainians fighting the Germans.

@martinstock

11 ай бұрын

WW2 was Germany vs the UdSSR. Not just Russia. There was barely any fighting in todays Russia. But in the Ukraine.

@user-ug6rn5si4r

11 ай бұрын

@@martinstock Russia is not at war in Ukraine yet. There is not even a mobilization of people and industry.

@opinionatedpossum1945

11 ай бұрын

@@user-ug6rn5si4r Russia has already lost.

@HedgehogZone

11 ай бұрын

And everyday more and more disgustingly russians die. Im glad that the ukrainians made the world a better place with less russians in it!

Может быть кто нибудь наконец расскажет немцам что военную технику нужно утилизировать у себя в стране а не на границе с Россией? Или это такой квест - брать рейхстаг этих "гениев" каждые 80 лет? Maybe someone will finally tell the Germans that military equipment needs to be disposed of in their own country and not on the border with Russia? Or is it such a quest to take the Reichstag of these "geniuses" every 80 years?

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

Russia still economically backward, corrupt, run by kleptocrat FSB crooks and soldiers looting toilets (says it all). A brutal backward country that vindictively attacks its small neighbors every 20 years. They never learn to work and just rob and loot resources to spread their misery. That time is coming to an end and shame will fall upon Russia and its people.

@kaianttila1619

11 ай бұрын

You couldn't even get past Poland.

@williamzk9083

11 ай бұрын

@@kaianttila1619 Russians would have lost without massive US and British help. Now US,UK,France, entire Free EU is against them instead of for them. They’ll loose

@klaabu99

10 ай бұрын

same works for russia....oh and it's cheaper to send old military equipment to ukraine than utilize it ...

@prochsdorogiplebey

10 ай бұрын

@@williamzk9083 Russia has never lost big battles and will not lose, this is the territory of former Vikings hardened by wars, who have a hidden Berserk mode, and when it turns on, no country can resist, Russia has used only 10% of its capabilities in Ukraine, and all the gathering of NATO aggressors aimed at the borders are forced to gather every month to figure out how they don't lose in disgrace. The principle of the offended ex-girlfriend, who for years got into a fight, and for the first time received an impudent face, whined and every week gathers a gathering of feminists to cry Россия никогда не проигрывала большие сражения и не проиграет, это территория бывших викингов закаленных войнами, у которых есть скрытый режим Берсекра, и когда он включается, ни одна страна с его нежным населением, по примеру немцев русской зимой... Россия задействовала всего 10% от своих возможностей на Украине, и все сборище агрессоров НАТО нацеленные на границы, вынуждены собираться каждый месяц чтобы придумать как им не проиграть с позором. Принцип обиженной бывшей, которая годами лезла в драку, и впервые получив по роже, заныла и каждую неделю собирает сборище феминисток дабы поплакаться

rubish scrap metal made in ue

Russian agression.....what a narativ from Holiwood B production films. Russian wepons are superior in any comperison with west wepons. West has money but not ideas.

@bananian

8 ай бұрын

Oh yeah? Like your next level cope cages on tanks? Is that your glorious Puta's great idea? 🤡🤡😂😂

8:26 🤣 ИС-2, ИСУ-122 - так и выглядит агрессивная агрессия агрессора! )))))