There is a way to eliminate animal testing. Dr. Shiva Ayadurai created computer technology that helps eliminate animal testing. Dr. Shiva is the ONLY Presidential candidate who competent enough to explain this kind of science and invent it.

Good Day, Dr. Johnson! First, I would just like to express my gratitude to you for sharing your honest opinions about animal research. I should say that we stand for the same thing. From your talk, you have said that if humans really value their lives and well-being, they should demand better and more effective research. I totally agree with this since, for years now, it has been proven that there are more failures in animal research compared to what we actually benefit from it. As you have also said in your talk, there are several other alternatives (use of advanced algorithms, "organs on a chip", and many others) that are proven to yield more promising results than animal testing. Moreover, I agree with your sentiment that we should focus more on what we can do to improve these alternatives rather than focusing on the methods that we know are not working and are not reliable enough. That is all. Thank you for your insightful talk, Ma’am!

Fantastic talk! Very intelligent arguments and well presented.

Excellent talk Syd Johnson, very reasoned, thank you.

thank you!

I'd love to see where the million estimate came from. Do you have a paper you can share? Thanks for your talk, Dr. Johnson!

@MM-qp4pd

2 ай бұрын

There is a way to eliminate animal testing. Dr. Shiva Ayadurai created computer technology that helps eliminate animal testing. Dr. Shiva is the ONLY Presidential candidate who competent enough to explain this kind of science and invent it.

Truely awesome

Brilliant!

I think this video is purposely hidden; how does a 38.9 million subscriber channel get 6 thousand views only.

@MM-qp4pd

2 ай бұрын

There is a way to eliminate animal testing. Dr. Shiva Ayadurai created computer technology that helps eliminate animal testing. Dr. Shiva is the ONLY Presidential candidate who competent enough to explain this kind of science and invent it.

Not at all

Two arguments are being made 1. Because we don't do experiment on human, we shouldn't do it on animals 2. animal testing have a high failure rate I think neither holds. for the the first argument, human to human relations are significantly different to human to animal relationships that drawing this parallel is almost certainly overextrapolation. The second argument is even more nonsensical, sure animal testing can have high failure rate, but saying it is worse than "chance" is astonishingly misleading, the chance of what? if researchers replace animal testing with coin flip it might statistically provide better correlation with historical data, does that mean we should do it? Most importantly, And how do alternatives they compare to animal testing? If animal testing the best technique we got in comparison, we should continue to use animal for testing.

@encouraginglyauthentic43

20 күн бұрын

Reducing they're arguments down doesn't disprove them.

Yes, completely justified

@arturo9187

3 ай бұрын

No.

@Srinivas-su6zs

18 күн бұрын

​@@arturo9187No .I admit

@Srinivas-su6zs

18 күн бұрын

👍

Yes

@arturo9187

3 ай бұрын

No.

@Srinivas-su6zs

18 күн бұрын

​@@arturo9187I admire you