Introduction to Max Stirner | The Ghost Philosopher

Max Stirner may not be very well known in college classrooms, however, he has become an internet icon with philosophy students. This video will give a basic introduction to Max Stirner including his biography and his philosophy.
Stirner is connected to the philosophy of egoism which focuses on the individual and your individual concerns. Many people, according to Stirner, are possessed by these fixed spiritual ideas. One of the main ideas of critique for Stirner is Christianity, but abstract ideas like "peace", "justice", and "humanity" are also considered spirit ideas. Like God, you can't point to something and say "that it justice." These essences are not to be of concern for Stirner, but instead, one's concern should be one's own.
Although arguably not making a big impact in the history of philosophy, Stirner's unique radical philosophy has made him famous in the culture of modern philosophy.
#philosophy #philosopher #religion
Instagram: amygdalacomics
Donations: ko-fi.com/philosophytoons
Business Email: amygdalavids@gmail.com

Пікірлер: 46

  • @GeneralPedrowsky
    @GeneralPedrowsky4 ай бұрын

    I think part of why he became so well known is that his depiction in the iconic drawings making him look like someone who thinks he's above everyone and everything, then you read his philosophy and it's exactly what you'd expect. That's very memeable.

  • @PhilosophyToons

    @PhilosophyToons

    4 ай бұрын

    He does look like that lol

  • @Autonomous_617

    @Autonomous_617

    4 ай бұрын

    The memes made him popular but also always drastically and grossly depart from his actual ideas.

  • @John-ir4id
    @John-ir4id4 ай бұрын

    As someone who studied Stirner before the internet was much more than message boards, I think he is one of those philosophers whose rhetorical style made his already controversial ideas prime fuel for edgelords and a prime target of social moralists of all stripes. However, the message I have always gotten from his works is one of individual authenticity for oneself and individual responsibility to oneself for all. His denouncement of sacred ...anything suggests that nothing is above suspicion because nothing is underpinned by anything except the individual, that all possessions - be it a couch, or an idea, or a relationship - should be constantly re-evaluated, taken or tossed as it serves the needs, desires, and circumstances of the one who possesses it in the moment. Anything more risks turning possessions into sacred relics that stall and poison individual freedom. ...pardon the ramble. I hope that made sense.

  • @KillyBilly141
    @KillyBilly141Ай бұрын

    i think stirner works best if you read him in your mid 20s just the breath of fresh air his views provide. i think in chapter 2 he goes on about the youth growing up into an adult man. And the shifting views from an idealist to a more egoist point of view. its very honest and looking at todays world it kinda explains how everything is so self serving and egoistic. and it helps you not getting consumed by this world.

  • @Autonomous_617
    @Autonomous_6174 ай бұрын

    More Stirner content would be cool.

  • @jaredclark9241
    @jaredclark92414 ай бұрын

    Awesome video. I can appreciate the wide range of philosophers you cover. Makes for interesting videos.

  • @EM-it9ju
    @EM-it9ju4 ай бұрын

    OG back with a video 👌

  • @PhilosophyToons

    @PhilosophyToons

    4 ай бұрын

    Thnx bro

  • @Wahid_4770
    @Wahid_47704 ай бұрын

    "I should be able to do whatever the hell I want" Rude is a SPOOK. NICE VIDEO 🎉🎉🎉

  • @krnflks
    @krnflks14 күн бұрын

    His philosophy really coincides with the idea of ego identity in psychology. A "fixed idea" is like someone shaping their ego identity around "spooks", or ideas with no real basis in reality.

  • @lawlietblank6695
    @lawlietblank66954 ай бұрын

    Please do one on philip mainlander next There isnt much content on him on KZread

  • @Wahid_4770

    @Wahid_4770

    4 ай бұрын

    On all sons and daughters of Schopenhauer!!! Mainlander, Bhansen, Hartmann, Plumacher, Druskowitz...

  • @PhilosophyToons

    @PhilosophyToons

    4 ай бұрын

    @@Wahid_4770 have the first names for those people?

  • @Wahid_4770

    @Wahid_4770

    4 ай бұрын

    @@PhilosophyToons Oh, you haven't heard of them? Assumed these folks were already on your radar. (THE POST SCHOPENHAUERIANS) 1. Philipp Mainländer 2. Julius Bahnsen 3. Eduard von Hartmann 4. Helene Druskowitz 5. Olga plumacher I also suggest you to read ALBERT CARACO (THE PROPHET OF CARNAGE) "Reading Albert Caraco is a torture. He may be the last truly dangerous author of world literature". -- Frédéric Saenen

  • @Wahid_4770

    @Wahid_4770

    4 ай бұрын

    @@PhilosophyToons weltschmerz: pessimism in German philosophy 1860-1900 by Fredrick Beiser

  • @Wahid_4770

    @Wahid_4770

    4 ай бұрын

    @@PhilosophyToons Oh, you haven't heard of them?Assumed these folks were already on your radar. 1. Philipp Mainländer 2. Julius Bahnsen 3. Eduard von Hartmann 4. Helene Druskowitz 5. Olga Plumacher

  • @howardpope3932
    @howardpope39324 ай бұрын

    Yes, "Stirn" is German for "forehead". And as far I remember Stirner didn´t write about wheels in the head but about too many rafters in the mind. At least in the German original. By the way, "Der Einzige und sein Eigentum" literally means "The Only One and his property."

  • @incitatuspersonified6586

    @incitatuspersonified6586

    4 ай бұрын

    Wheels in your head is said in the, "Ego and its Property" translation, while the 'Rafters in your head' translation is done by Wolfi Landstreicher (a more accurate translation than the originally popular Ego one, which has many erroneous elements including the emphasis on Ego where Stirner did not have it). The original German goes as thus, "Mensch, es spukt in Deinem Kopfe; Du hast einen Sparren zu viel! Du bildest Dir große Dinge ein und malst Dir eine ganze Götterwelt aus, die für Dich da sei, ein Geisterreich, zu welchem Du berufen seist, ein Ideal, das Dir winkt. Du hast eine fixe Idee!"

  • @howardpope3932

    @howardpope3932

    4 ай бұрын

    Thank you for the information. Very interesting indeed. @@incitatuspersonified6586

  • @TheMjsanty
    @TheMjsanty4 ай бұрын

    Fantastic!

  • @karimahclintonfilms
    @karimahclintonfilms3 ай бұрын

    Commenting for the algo because i want more stirner videos...is stirner saying like Nietzsche: What is good? - All that heightens the feelings of power, the will to power, power itself in man. What is bad? - All that proceeds from weakness. A plea to for all mankind to forget false narratives and focus on becoming the best versions of themselves.

  • @timisontube

    @timisontube

    Ай бұрын

    Lots of similarities and plenty of debate about possible influence/co-incidence. There’s probably some nuanced differences, with Stirner being ok with weakness when we choose it for our own, instead of it being a morality. Nietz seems more committed to a hierarchy of will, Stirner is more anarchic maybe. Idk I haven’t deeply read either I’m a KZread comment lol

  • @SteveJones379
    @SteveJones3794 ай бұрын

    Yes! 🤘

  • @kingdm8315
    @kingdm83154 ай бұрын

    Nice

  • @albinnn4
    @albinnn44 ай бұрын

    This is why the world is what it is and is heading where it's heading. It's a "not even wrong" philosophy. You cannot separate yourself from the world as if you were not in it and expect good results.

  • @anthroposlogica9379

    @anthroposlogica9379

    2 ай бұрын

    We just need more philosophy in general too much material "wealth" not enough mental enrichment

  • @howardpope3932
    @howardpope39324 ай бұрын

    The photo of Bavaria shows Munich, but Stirner was born in Bayreuth.

  • @intellectually_lazy
    @intellectually_lazy4 ай бұрын

    ego! ja, i got it! laveyan here, so...

  • @pedroba76
    @pedroba764 ай бұрын

    The introduction of his book is interesting, but couldn't we also say that Stirner himself is also possessed by the fixed idea of "ego" "my interest" "me" "myself" "self"?

  • @pedroba76

    @pedroba76

    4 ай бұрын

    But I kinda agree with how he compares ideologies and fixed ideas to "ghosts" that possess people's mind and controls them. Instead of the idea serving and pleasing the mind, the mind serves and pleases the idea, the cause, the abstract concept.

  • @josefu0

    @josefu0

    4 ай бұрын

    He also mentioned that you can have these ideas as something disposable to have and then rid of when it does not please you anymore.

  • @John-ir4id

    @John-ir4id

    3 ай бұрын

    Look up Kane B. He has a wonderful, if a little dry, series on Stirner where he speaks a little about the concept of the Unique - the direct translation of a word that is often translated as Ego in Stirner - and how it is a placeholder word, like a name, for the individual, which Stirner considers beyond definition.

  • @puppetmaskerr
    @puppetmaskerrАй бұрын

    Good video but the dimension of his work which relates to Marx and the young hegelians isn't explored. Which is a shame since its arguably why the Stirner is still relevant.

  • @intellectually_lazy
    @intellectually_lazy4 ай бұрын

    well, plato means broad, and cicero means chick pea

  • @luyombojonathan6688

    @luyombojonathan6688

    3 ай бұрын

    🤓🤓

  • @inthemist8435
    @inthemist84353 ай бұрын

    200th liker is me kissesss =D

  • @sercabie
    @sercabie4 ай бұрын

    My 1yr old baby has independently developed this same philosophy, he's brilliant!!

  • @intellectually_lazy
    @intellectually_lazy4 ай бұрын

    max stirner, it's the name you long to touch, but you mustn't touch...

  • @acetaminophetus
    @acetaminophetus3 ай бұрын

    They called themselves Dye Fryin'. Or, the Free. Live free or die Fryin'. KFC. Also, my headcanon is that Stirner was autistic, and this influenced his philosophy heavily, and also explains his demeanor. I converged on very similar ideas to Stirner before my diagnosis (although autism isn't really an illness). Stirnerian Egoism has also been described as "very Buddhisty" by Buddhists in the know, which is why your copy of Der Einzige has that cover.

  • @Zachmxyzptlk
    @ZachmxyzptlkАй бұрын

    2spooky4me

  • @hdcbpxsytahdcbpx
    @hdcbpxsytahdcbpx4 ай бұрын

    stirner is not real he was made up by engels

  • @nullro_

    @nullro_

    4 ай бұрын

    I support this claim wholeheartedly

  • @intellectually_lazy
    @intellectually_lazy4 ай бұрын

    um, yeah, because delbel is basic. he can shove that fulton building somewhere too. worst prof @ ccc