Interesting Olympiad Math.

Пікірлер: 35

  • @hjs6102
    @hjs61024 күн бұрын

    Perhaps the answer is correct, but not the way to get there. Squaring and multiplying with x² on both sides is only possible if you exclude cases such as -1=1 squared -> 1=1.

  • @tejpalsingh366
    @tejpalsingh366Күн бұрын

    Another answer will be √i+(1/√i)

  • @HejHejda-hh3wl
    @HejHejda-hh3wl4 күн бұрын

    Did anyone else do it through imaginary numbers😂 I got 2/sqrt(2) which is the same as sqrt(2) because 2 is just 2^1 and sqrt(2) = 2^0.5 then 2^1/2^0.5 subtraction = 2^0.5 = sqrt(2) so i got the same answer just did not do it his way i started by getting the solutions to the first equation x+1/x = sqrt(2) and multiplied everything by x then got two solutions and through de moivres formula took to power of 777 and could take inverse with de moivre or conjugate of denominator mutliplied by nominator and denominator. I got same answer for both of the solutions of x namely 2/sqrt(2) = sqrt(2)

  • @mismis3153
    @mismis31534 күн бұрын

    In fact, x^n + x^-n has a period of 8, when x + 1/x = sqrt(2). And since 777 is one more than a multiple of 8, x^777 + x^-777 = x + x^-1 = sqrt(2). Here is a somewhat tedious proof : For simplicity, note F(n) = x^n + x^-n First, notice that F(n) * F(1) = F(n + 1) + F(n - 1). By decreasing n, we get the following expression : F(n) = F(n-1) * F(1) - F(n-2) F(n) = sqrt(2) * F(n-1) - F(n-2) [1] Then, by subbing [1] into F(n-1), we get : F(n) = 2 F(n-2) - sqrt(2) * F(n-3) - F(n-2) F(n) = F(n-2) - sqrt(2) * F(n-3) Again, subbing [1] into F(n-2), we get : F(n) = sqrt(2) * F(n-3) - F(n-4) - sqrt(2) * F(n-3) F(n) = -F(n-4) [2]. From [2], we get that F(n) = F(n-8).

  • @ChidexOnlineMathClass01

    @ChidexOnlineMathClass01

    4 күн бұрын

    @@mismis3153 Thanks so much for this

  • @davestillhere4169
    @davestillhere41698 күн бұрын

    Thank you, very nicely done.

  • @ChidexOnlineMathClass01

    @ChidexOnlineMathClass01

    8 күн бұрын

    Thanks so much

  • @ChidexOnlineMathClass01

    @ChidexOnlineMathClass01

    8 күн бұрын

    Thanks so much

  • @gnanadesikansenthilnathan6750
    @gnanadesikansenthilnathan67505 күн бұрын

    I understood

  • @ChidexOnlineMathClass01

    @ChidexOnlineMathClass01

    5 күн бұрын

    @@gnanadesikansenthilnathan6750 Welcome

  • @CarlFriedrichGauss1
    @CarlFriedrichGauss16 күн бұрын

    hey man the question is wrong as the Range of x+(1/x) is (-∞,-2] U [2,∞) hence 2^1/2 dosent lies between this Range therefore this equation of x+(1/x)=2^1/2 isnt even possible.

  • @ChidexOnlineMathClass01

    @ChidexOnlineMathClass01

    6 күн бұрын

    How do you think this question can be wrong ?

  • @ChidexOnlineMathClass01

    @ChidexOnlineMathClass01

    6 күн бұрын

    Obviously the equation does not have real solutions, but that does not make the evaluation of x^777 + 1/x^777 wrong! Infact the question is very correct and very interesting

  • @Straight_Talk

    @Straight_Talk

    6 күн бұрын

    ​​@@ChidexOnlineMathClass01 If there are no real solutions for x, how can there be a real solution for the expression we need to evaluate? Also, it's intuitively wrong to get the same value for the expression when x is raised to the powers of 1/-1 and 777/-777.

  • @klausolekristiansen2960

    @klausolekristiansen2960

    6 күн бұрын

    @@Straight_Talk In this case, the complex solution is a real number. The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers.

  • @Straight_Talk

    @Straight_Talk

    6 күн бұрын

    @@klausolekristiansen2960 What are you talking about? Do you have any grasp of basic maths?