Inside the Pandemic: A candid conversation with Dr. Michael Osterholm and Andy Slavitt

Watch as U of M COVID-19 expert Dr. Michael Osterholm and former Senior Advisor to the Biden Administration’s COVID Response Andy Slavitt talk one-on-one about COVID-19. Deeply relevant to our world today, these leading experts will talk candidly about the challenges of the pandemic, what went right and what went wrong, ripple effects of the pandemic, and what’s next.
Originally aired on Thursday, November 18, 2021

Пікірлер: 43

  • @manateeluvrfl7478
    @manateeluvrfl74782 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for this talk and your service to this country!

  • @pauliseri935
    @pauliseri9352 жыл бұрын

    I want to say that Dr. Osterholm has become the one I listen to for my info on Covid. It's the way he doesn't say that this, or that is absolute, or when he says he doesn't know he says so. This hasn't happened in approx100 years and anyone who says they know for sure is well...let's just leave it at that.

  • @KnockemOrLockem

    @KnockemOrLockem

    2 жыл бұрын

    He says it is absolute that the virus was passed to humans by an animal. He says that is fact.

  • @stayinalive9434
    @stayinalive94342 жыл бұрын

    There is a risk when crossing the street. I limit those risks by crossing at a signal, by looking both ways twice, by moving as quickly as I can to the other side, by making eye contact with drivers, by not talking on my cell or drinking starbucks, by listening for runaway vehicles. Doing all these things arent making me less free. It is easy and not at all encroaching on my "freedom".

  • @markgivens3225
    @markgivens32252 жыл бұрын

    Disappointed with the first topic about people and science. I find that the phrase ‘follow the science’ is not the same as ‘follow science’ (ie continual inquiry perhaps until ‘proof’). The dominant media and public health messages may have some roots in science. Many of the people who are concerned about safety, efficacy, and potential negative implications of these vaccines also have roots in science even though it is not the dominant perspective. I believe we are all better off through respectful discussion of all alternatives and ‘tools’ for testing, treatment, prevention, and recovery.

  • @popland1977

    @popland1977

    2 жыл бұрын

    Most anti vaxers misrepresent really everything to do with vaccines.

  • @markgivens3225

    @markgivens3225

    2 жыл бұрын

    There are some that do, there are some with legitimate concerns which should be respected and alternative prevention/treatment protocol suggested, rather than being ‘dismissive’ of an anti-vax perspective. I am personally double-vaxxed & considering which booster. However I also respect personal choice and concern. While the vaccines may be the ‘single best tool’ for preventing severe outcomes, the vaccines are only one tool. We all benefit from more complete and clear messages about all of the tools that provide benefit (D, zinc, mouthwash, nasal flushing, ventilation, etc.). There are many tools that are needed for both ‘breakthrough’ infections and ‘non-vaxxed’ infections. Applying many tools is best ultimate path to limit spread, limit hospital burden, and reduce severe outcomes.

  • @popland1977

    @popland1977

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@markgivens3225 Legitimate health and safety concerns have been addressed, they just don't father agenda of many opposed

  • @Rabbitburnx

    @Rabbitburnx

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@popland1977 Anti-vac is a pejorative to demonize and shut down conversations. You are either uninformed or simple minded and intellectually lazy.

  • @smoothopsop8471
    @smoothopsop84712 жыл бұрын

    Dr.Osterholm you're doing a great service to public. I wish I could say the same about Dr. Fauci. I just wanted to say thankyou for your service.

  • @michaelgrimes3564
    @michaelgrimes35642 жыл бұрын

    VENTILATION

  • @gw2315
    @gw23152 жыл бұрын

    Reality tv depicting ICU stories not just the patient bed bound but the lives that are all interconnected. Media this is where we need you to unite not divide. Why is 90 day fiancé the top show? It’s the humanity of it.

  • @popland1977
    @popland19772 жыл бұрын

    Great conversation however he totally dodged the question at 26:00

  • @jacobsladder827
    @jacobsladder8272 жыл бұрын

    Ivermectin "highly toxic?" That's a big lie.

  • @Earl_Larson
    @Earl_Larson2 жыл бұрын

    Fast forward to Thanksgiving weekend ; The Omicron Variant has arrived..! Lots of New Questions to be answered.. Whoa..!

  • @JAXX3L
    @JAXX3L2 жыл бұрын

    This DR is a CLOWN

  • @dudetwitter5025
    @dudetwitter50252 жыл бұрын

    This BS about driving on a highway needs to be qualified. Just throwing numbers is meaningless. Who is at risk, what time interval, and what is the data to back that up. For example I am not driving on a highway so I have no risk in that regard.

  • @viveviveka2651
    @viveviveka26512 жыл бұрын

    Doctor Bhattacharya of Stanford and Doctor Kulldorff of Harvard are just as competent and informed as these guys, if not more so, and they see it differently.

  • @fabiansandoval6132

    @fabiansandoval6132

    2 жыл бұрын

    No one is more competent than Dr Michael Osterholm.

  • @viveviveka2651

    @viveviveka2651

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@fabiansandoval6132 I'm not at all sure that is true. Granted, he is very competent, and among the best; but there are some who are comparable, and perhaps a few who exceed him in one way or another. Certainly there are specialists who exceed him in their own areas of expertise. Some vaccinologists exceed him in their field, for example. The same can be said for some of the virologists, statisticians, logicians, biochemists, immunologists, and psychologists, among others. Many would object, but existentialist and other philosophers can contribute insights beyond the usual, when it comes to facing death and evaluating risks and risk-benefit analyses. Kulldorff has a better perspective on the mental health of children, and on natural immunity. Child psychologists and educational psychologists certainly can contribute, and their contributions may surpass those of Osterholm when it comes to these considerations.

  • @Lp78Ch
    @Lp78Ch2 жыл бұрын

    Hello? South Korea is now seeing the highest number of daily COVID cases and deaths, despite having 78.2% of the country fully vaccinated.

  • @jordanfrederiksen5996

    @jordanfrederiksen5996

    2 жыл бұрын

    [citation needed]

  • @outsiderofficial4954

    @outsiderofficial4954

    2 жыл бұрын

    78% is not enough unless you have restrictions

  • @popland1977

    @popland1977

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@outsiderofficial4954 It's unfortunately true. Ireland has 77% and yet is on the top 12 worst countries right now

  • @cathynakayama470

    @cathynakayama470

    2 жыл бұрын

    Some have waning immunity so not really fully vaccinated.

  • @Lp78Ch

    @Lp78Ch

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@cathynakayama470 So you want to get booster shots for the rest of your life? Seriously?

  • @formattester6
    @formattester62 жыл бұрын

    Osterholm for me is the best all around voice on covid

  • @viveviveka2651
    @viveviveka26512 жыл бұрын

    Everyone is an expert, because everyone has an ego.

  • @Kenneth_Usher
    @Kenneth_Usher2 жыл бұрын

    Time to stop the talking. Time to introduce a worldwide mandatory vaccination program.

  • @cathynakayama470

    @cathynakayama470

    2 жыл бұрын

    Exactly!!!!!!!

  • @Lp78Ch

    @Lp78Ch

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@cathynakayama470 These are not vaccines. It's "gene therapy." Even Pfizer and Moderna agree to that wording. NOT a vaccine.

  • @johnjohnsonjohn

    @johnjohnsonjohn

    2 жыл бұрын

    No

  • @Amazing_Mark

    @Amazing_Mark

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Lp78Ch Nonsense.

  • @tomforan8516

    @tomforan8516

    2 жыл бұрын

    Absolutely Not - I would go to War first ............