CIG "We need to put brakes on building multi-crew ships since it's taking too long and systems are not there yet" CIG two days later "So here's a 6 people multi ship..."

@ClowdyHowdy

Жыл бұрын

Concept artists have to work on something.

@HooverCrafter

Жыл бұрын

@@ClowdyHowdy If there is an imbalance between creating and concepting hire more Staff to execute the concepts...

@Vardrack69

Жыл бұрын

@@ClowdyHowdy Concept artists can work on something that matter. A large number of ships are in need of a rework since they don't have physicalized components, but I guess it doesn't bring any good whales money.

@DrSmugface

Жыл бұрын

@@HooverCrafter they actually hire about 300 people

@alienzen7809

Жыл бұрын

@@HooverCrafter There would be over 100 job vacancies available.....

Absolutely love the galaxy. A little afraid that it is just another big ship disappearing in the big ship pipeline.

@SpaceMike3

Жыл бұрын

Exactly. I guess the Odyssey is pushed further aside than it was

@DrSmugface

Жыл бұрын

@@SpaceMike3 let's not even talk about the endeavour..

@fatrick9001

Жыл бұрын

Big ship buyers are "true believers" in the Star Citizen project who have a lot of disposable income/wealth. If that doesn't describe you don't get it.

@rooster1012

Жыл бұрын

@@DrSmugface But...but...but they can't work on the Endeavor because it's modular....said all the white knights on Spectrum.

@fauli75

Жыл бұрын

No need to be afraid…it is guaranteed that it will be lost in the clutter of concept ships.

My fear and the fear of many others is it just becomes another caterpillar where we get zero details for years on the modularity. I personally avoid modularity because I know it will be a far longer wait for a modular ship than a purpose built one.

@JINGWA64

Жыл бұрын

each year they need generate revenue, to cover development costs and since new ships and concepts sell so well = they will focus allot of their revenue planing and marketting around this... and not whats already in-game or been in concept for years... so if one wants to change this, folks merely need to put more of there money into whats old, rather then whats new = they will focus more on what there to begin with, then focus on trying to find new things to sell, because their finances for next year have been covered by whats already there which is selling enough for them to not need to push more new stuff. 50mil over 10 years is not allot of money for 3-4 AAA MMO games rolled into 1, couldnt make a new cod game on that, rockstar would go bust in less then a year if that all they had to survive of... so the fact CIG has gotten as far as they have and made what they have, is a testament to the quality management and having the right people on the job... but once u got 100's people and other operational costs... you need revenue to pay the bills and ur workers each year and 50mil per year... yea, should be atleast 100mil per year actually.

@JINGWA64

Жыл бұрын

only flip side to this is obviously is whats old can only really sell vs the number of existing backers as well, so eventually they will need to release new stuff, but obviously most people dont invest allot into the game even they enjoy the game, so CIG needs to try find ways to entice them.

@spider0804

Жыл бұрын

@@JINGWA64 Can get in a coversation for hours about it or I can just not buy it realizing it is modular as well as big which means years away. I for one am happy to pretend like it does not exist and move on.

@alkazarjkdghjd

Жыл бұрын

@@JINGWA64 Actualy they don't need any more revenue, they already have enouth to finish the game even if they stopped getting any more income.

@SubduedRadical

Жыл бұрын

@@JINGWA64 I think that's not the answer. The answer is for people to ONLY buy flyable or straight to flyable ships. People buy Idrisis every year. The things sell out instantly. So do Javelins and Krakens. And the BMM. Clearly putting money into them isn't making them come out. If people would ONLY buy new ships that are straight to flyable, and stop buying concepts (even existing ones), it would force them to actually finish ships as they'd see new dollars are only going to ships once flyable. And if people only bought ships that were flyable that they liked (ships in game and functional now as well as straight-to-flyable new ships), they MIGHT eventually get the message. Maybe.

I'd love to have a Cutlass-size RSI ship for a daily driver role. Not Connie-size, which is twice bigger and much slower, but specifically the Cutlass or Spirit class. Now that Drake got into starter ship segment, maybe RSI can get into the medium segment as well.

@Spelljammer1

Жыл бұрын

Great idea, hope it keeps the Scorpius/galaxy twin peaks chin.

@Nicolves.

Жыл бұрын

That exactly what I'm looking for. Cutlass and Freelancer are not really my style. When they announced Spirit, I thought it would be my moment, but it's a complete disappointment. I hope they drastically change Spirit or bring in an RSI competitor.

@coolcupofpop

Жыл бұрын

Following this design profile.. PLEASE!!

@TheIrishBread

Жыл бұрын

they already are, the Aurora is RSI's starter ships

@torenvarela9340

Жыл бұрын

@@TheIrishBread The Aurora is pretty dang small compared to a Cutlass or a Freelancer. I think a proper RSI 2-3 man ship would be a nice addition for some players. Personally I like the Cutlass a lot, so I'm happy with the current offerings.

I can't wait to see the Galaxy in-game in 8 years.

@blackworldtraveler3711

Жыл бұрын

Looks like you can wait if you already have 8 years planned. I'm buying tomorrow.

@yuhyuhitsyaboi5460

Жыл бұрын

I thought they said it was coming on Saturday?

@0waverunner0

Жыл бұрын

@@yuhyuhitsyaboi5460 the concept sale. the ship is still a LONG ways out from being in game.

@blackworldtraveler3711

Жыл бұрын

@@shaneprince6572 I'm absolutely debt free,FIRE, and can do whatever I want.

@Gigageorge

Жыл бұрын

@Cloud Citizen nah I give the game another 5 to 6 years to be in a stable state. Then Im out.... Again. not complete. stable. To get the full promised systems will take like.. 30 years.

Fix the ship backlog first! Still unreleased ships: Idris - 9 years BMM - 9 years Javelin - 8 years Orion - 8 years Liberator - 1 year Crucible - 7 years Genesis Starliner - 7 years Hull C, D and E (3 ships) - 7 years Endeavour - 7 years Polaris - 6 years Pioneer - 5 years Kraken - 4 years Nautilus - 3 years Kraken Privateer - 3 years Perseus - 2 years Odyssey - 11 months

@UFMastodon

Жыл бұрын

Someone will be along shortly to tell you that different teams can work on different things conveniently not asking the question why do we need a concept team that works at 4 times the speed of the vehicle dev team.

@ElectariumTunic

Жыл бұрын

There are some ship classes they won't currently develop due to missing features; e.g... • Most captital ships are on hold due to missing NPC crew, crew gameplay, and server limits on the number of players. • Science ships are on hold due to the lack of science gameplay. • Repair ships are on hold due to lack of repair gameplay. • Large cargo ships are on hold due to lack of intended cargo systems and sufficient economy simulation. • Minelaying ships are on hold due to missing persistency, mine mechanics and systems. • Construction ships are on hold due to missing construction gameplay (and construction purpose) • Passenger ships are on hold due to missing passenger mechanics, systems and server limits.

@mercenum5186

Жыл бұрын

Imagine waiting up to 9 years for your video game purchase 🤣 This list needs to be put on every SC spaceship marketing video. Because it's the truth and shows a very real track record of them not delivering what they sell people.

@Phat_man

Жыл бұрын

Have you noticed that the backlog of the ships are very complicated ships wand the majority being capital class?

@Andy-by9de

Жыл бұрын

Funny thing is the Idris is done. They just won’t release it to the PTU.

If this ship was out (flight ready). I would definitly buy it. But my wallet is closed to any concept.

@baltod4978

Жыл бұрын

Agreed. Same boat. Would have easily have picked up the entire lot if it were flight read. Instead we got the cutter. Still waiting for my other 6 "in-concept" ships to be released.

@jeremypeterlee5120

Жыл бұрын

@@baltod4978 ha ha, yes, I'm still waiting for about $4000 worth of ships still in concept since I pledged them 4+ years ago with each year being the promise of its available "in game status". I've learned hard to close my wallet when, of my 14 ships pledged, only 4 are flight ready and playable. lol. I'm a Bitter Bitching Betsy, but my wallet says I'm a believer and a supporter! lol

@chrissyndrome6641

9 ай бұрын

Thought you said … but my wallet is still in concept lmao 😂

Glad to see the work on the Polaris is going well

@phoenixsui

Жыл бұрын

I didnt see it but i hope i do next week ;D

@lilbu223

Жыл бұрын

As well as on the Nautilus, Idris, Odyssey, Endeavor, Perseus, Starfarer, Liberator, Vulcan, Crucible, Hull series, Merchantman, Railen, Legionnaire, San'tok.yāi, Volper, Spark, Pioneer, Kraken, Apollo, Orion, Ranger, Lynx, G12, X1 and the Spirit 🤣

@CptFugu

Жыл бұрын

It is all I expected!

@themarve

Жыл бұрын

@@lilbu223 poor Genesis :D

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

Well it basically is why they made this ship, so even though you're being ironic it's accurate

Oh great another concept, Question 🙋‍♀️ is this a Before or After BMM release ?

@blackworldtraveler3711

Жыл бұрын

Don't matter to me.

@0waverunner0

Жыл бұрын

you know that answer...

@urghfas7843

Жыл бұрын

ofc, every show we get them, like always and thats normal and will be in future - so the pipe never gets empty And yes, you knew it, so i do 😏

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

Don't buy it???

@0waverunner0

Жыл бұрын

Looks like you struck a nerve. 😂😂😂

I'll look forward to seeing it be released from concept in 10 years

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

I look forward to your next low effort unoriginal shitpost

@tropicthndr

Жыл бұрын

This guy gets its, too bad the idiotic Disney fanboys don’t.

@patrickspaceman305

Жыл бұрын

Concept?.....that will be a design update....

I'll consider this ship in 4 years when it's in whitebox.

@Yasma-

Жыл бұрын

facts

@ByOdinsBart

Жыл бұрын

Its coming early 2023, they are already working on it.

@james18paice

Жыл бұрын

@@ByOdinsBart I highly doubt that

@UFMastodon

Жыл бұрын

@@ByOdinsBart Do you actually believe that?

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

@@james18paice Argument from incredulity, also known as argument from personal incredulity, appeal to common sense, or the divine fallacy, is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition must be false because it contradicts one's personal expectations or beliefs, or is difficult to imagine.

Please finish the Polaris and Perseus before we get another large RSI

@viscounttudon68

Жыл бұрын

@@Yasma- Exactly. Don’t get me wrong, this thing looks great (kinda what I wish the Polaris looked like, tbh) but we really need to get older ships out the door before we do more concept ships, esp. bigger ones with long dev times. Both the Polaris and Perseus have the tech they need to be at min. functionality (turrets and missiles all work, mostly, and no ship has engineering in yet). Yet we get more backburner ships like this.

Honestly love it, but I’m doubtful we will see it this decade :(

@Shawnsrumi

Жыл бұрын

Cry about to more I’m sure that will help.

@lollyguy1266

Жыл бұрын

@@Shawnsrumi actually pushback against these things probably would help yes.

It looks to be a great ship. There are already so many multi-crew that have been stuck in concept for almost a decade.. Really wish we'd get some of those finished first

Another one for the backlog :) And what an awesome idea to showcase the Polairs the day after the ship goes off sale, brilliant /s

@Shawnsrumi

Жыл бұрын

Boo hoo.

@fenrisulv

Жыл бұрын

@@DM-sx6ld Hahaha xD If you're gonna try an impersonate a CIG employee you need to try harder xD Your sentence does not sell it for you, as youtube and spectrum are two different things and there is no way to link them, try hader hahaha

@fenrisulv

Жыл бұрын

@@DM-sx6ld Oh no I've lost my spectrum access, it's real omg nooo xD You're hillarious lol

@rhadiem

Жыл бұрын

Bait meet switch.

The Anaconda is definitely one of my favorite ships.

@rajivroekalea2769

Жыл бұрын

isnt this more of Python tho? the only thing that is wrong from the python is the cockpit placement

@invader218

Жыл бұрын

@@Dumb-Comment you can't in the Quest ether cause it will not be made till 2030. what's your point.

@DopeEx

Жыл бұрын

@@Dumb-Comment But I can already fly the Anaconda

@DanAwestrike

Жыл бұрын

@@rajivroekalea2769 Yup, you're right; it's been a couple of years. I believe the modularity bit is what made me think 'Anaconda', since it was so strong in it's versatility between combat, hauling, and exploration. I have fond memories of the Python, too. That said, the Galaxy is a good looking ship.

@andresmessina9674

Жыл бұрын

I immediately thought Anaconda as well, I guess SC will finally let us CMDRs walk in a few of our favorite ships lol

yea its cool and all but can we please have the ships that are in concept for years instead of new big ships that will be hybernate in concept for another next 4 years?

@jeffrbake

Жыл бұрын

Galaxy is rumored to be out with pyro

@str4in

Жыл бұрын

i guess they try to fill ship roles for pyro

@SpaceMike3

Жыл бұрын

@@jeffrbake Hopefully but I jokingly assume the Odyssey will be first

@nikkothegoblin

Жыл бұрын

Like the corsair? The BMM? And the Apollo rumored to be in works right now? They will come, Invictus is next up. Hope we do see the railen at alien week too. I'm not disagreeing with you on lengthy time scale, but there is progress

@trsiel8953

Жыл бұрын

@@nikkothegoblin The BMM have a chance to be "in pause" during undetermined time to redistribute resources (developers) onto other ships...

Hey, is it on a 50 week production cycle like the BMM was last year?

@harrisoncortis8416

Жыл бұрын

Its a lot worse than that.

a long time ago the cutlass blue was called modular.... we know the ending....

They literally don't feel at all bad about selling more huge dream ships when some they sold 10 years ago are still not delivered?

@mercenum5186

Жыл бұрын

I'm sure they see the comments and they don't care. The rubes keep lining up to buy the spaceship drawings.

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

Strawman

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

@@mercenum5186 the irony is the ones who cry about it are the ones who keep coming back, to cry about it

@tomato6460

Жыл бұрын

@@mercenum5186 Indeed. They can and do replace backers who have worked out not to give them money with new backers who will buy ships

Oh boy, the carrot dangling with modularity again.

So, another Polaris, to be delayed indefinitely after people buy it?

@maxdoesntsurrender6642

Жыл бұрын

Yep, can’t say I’m surprised. Let’s hope they don’t crash through next weeks episode as well

Finish the older concepts first? I think 10 years of waiting is enough... We don't have to assume the consequences that CIG was unable to deliver some base mechanisms during this time, like a good hauling/commerce system.

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

Strawman / Declaration from Ignorance Ie not to be taken seriously

Looks great, but how long before we see it in game? As many others have noted, there are many long overdue ships that need to be put into game. Finish them please, and fix the ships in game that we’re going to be modular. Warden class, Avenger class, etc. These would be easier to get into game and more people would buy them. Everyone keep posting. CIG needs to listen. I rarely play due to all the bugs and not finished ships. Happy Thanksgiving everyone!

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

Don't buy it then 👾

@invader218

Жыл бұрын

@@uncannyvalley2350 your white knighting everywhere. let the people talk. let them all express the discontent we have. 😎😎

@thatdude1435

Жыл бұрын

@@uncannyvalley2350 if you dont agree, stay away then.

Wouldn't it be awesome if they created the modules for all those supposedly modular ships they have already released? I mean the Galaxy looks amazing in concept and I want to see it in action. But it will be just another modular ship where they will come up with some excuse as to why there won't be any modules on release of the ship. Probably some which has to be developed first and isn't ready quite yet.

@JonathanS89

Жыл бұрын

Or release this in the 3 flavors and add modularity later

@urghfas7843

Жыл бұрын

Jared said it, they are going back to the modularity

@lilbu223

Жыл бұрын

@@urghfas7843 maybe they realised its cheaper in the long run

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

Armchair critics are always so smart, just ask them

@tropicthndr

Жыл бұрын

Now that everyone has seen it, they want all the older ships redone with modular kits. The artist are going yea that’s easy, here’s ten more years of going nowhere but now you get the prettiest ships you can imagine.

Galaxy looks sick but PLEASE JARED, what happened to the Crucible? It was on the progress tracker and got removed without any comment!

The RSI Galaxi is such a large ship that it should have an infirmary with a medical bed independent of the modules that can be added as well as the Carrack.

Absolutely love the Medical Pisces! And the Galaxy is a beautiful ship too, but with it being in concept, it's going to be a long while before I get one. Still waiting on my Rangers, SRV, Legionnaire, Perseus and Liberator. Not going to shell out any more cash for concept ships that get forgotten about for years.

@Blackburn6969

Жыл бұрын

Really don't get these people complaining about how long ships take. The game still isn't out, what difference does it make?

@lilbu223

Жыл бұрын

@@Blackburn6969 So when is the game coming out? How much longer must backers wait for ships they bought 10 years ago?

@grimvynone-eye3942

Жыл бұрын

@@Blackburn6969 Is the game available for people to log in and play it? Yes. Do you have to pay them to obtain access to log in and play it? Yes... The game is out. Just because they want to hide behind calling it an alpha doesn't mean it really is. This game went live a long time ago and is just a half finished live release with ongoing feature creep.

I don't wanna see more concepts, I want more finished ships.

@chadington565

Жыл бұрын

I share this sentiment but you should realize something critical to this. The teams that make concept ships are not the same teams that make functional ships. The teams that make concept ships dont have the technical assets to create fully functional ships. This is why flight ready ships are often much different the OC. Compare it to an architect designing a floor plan but an engineer being the one to make it functional and realistic clarifying that I stand with you on wanting to see more OC ships completed, just want to point out the reality of what is happening

@UFMastodon

Жыл бұрын

@@chadington565 Why does the game need a concept team that can come up with six or seven concept ships a year but a vehicle dev team that can only make 3 or 4 smaller ships a year? I think we all know why but I'm sorry the answer that the concept team is working on different things doesn't cut it anymore, because we don't need new concepts atm, we need more people finishing ships and gameplay loops, we need server meshing. Why are we paying for concept artists who have created a backlog of ships that will take years to build. They're just making the backlog bigger.

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

But daddy! *I want an Oompa Lumpa NOW*

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

@@UFMastodon why are you asking random strangers to win your approval when they aren't responsible for the game, are you trying to play Inquisitor, is that what complaining about the most ambitious game on the market that no one's forcing you to play is to you, an opportunity to play internet cop???

@JINGWA64

Жыл бұрын

@@UFMastodon its doesnt take long to make a concept, it however takes more people and time to make a ship, its not rocket science + if folks dont want to support whats already there = they will release new concepts to try generate annual revenue to pay for all their staff and keep growing them, because they are making 3-4 AAA MMO's rolled into 1 with AAA+ assets and coding, which is possible for indie as well long as they have the time and the right people, but u cant eliminate all the cost when hiring 100's people, it adds up quickly and sorry to say 50million dollars spread out over 10 years simply doesnt cut it, this would prevent infinity ward even starting their next COD game and would send Rockstar bust in less then a year if that whats they had survive on... folks need to use that brain of theirs, its not rocket science, if u want less concepts, get more people to support whats already there and they will focus on that more, because they dont have to worry about paying their workers salaries next year, they dont have to focus on click bait marketing each year as much.... again its not rocket science.

Hopefully those of us in our 40s will be alive to see this.

@Cozmox874

Жыл бұрын

I'm 19 I don't think I'll even see this one

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

Turns out shitposts are way easier

@deepmind299

Жыл бұрын

@@uncannyvalley2350 if your going to TRY to insult me, TRY to do so coherently.

Not just me that looks at the silhouette of the Perseus, Polaris and now Galaxy and thinks of the "same same, but different" meme is it? Seeing that arrow shaped large vehicle heading at you from 20km out is going to be a whirlwind of emotions whenever they're all in game

@rots3123

Жыл бұрын

"Star destroyer small size version" style

@thomasjoyce7910

Жыл бұрын

Or a Nautilus.

Very nice new concept. It would be a good time to work on the Misc Endeavor and on the Drake Caterpillar modules.

@Blackburn6969

Жыл бұрын

And retaliator

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

Reality isn't as simple as your knee jerk crybaby bullshit Feel free to play literally anything else

@baremetalmafia

Жыл бұрын

Good luck with that, they already milked the backers for those ships lol

@Joseph-wh5of

Жыл бұрын

It is so sad...

What are the Caterpillars modules?

"Hey Polaris owners we know you're all super excited to learn more about the changes to your ship...sooo anyways here's an announcement of a whole new ship that probably won't be playable anytime soon and almost definitely won't have use of it's 'modularity' for several years after. We'll get around to updating you on your ship you already payed (sorry, PLEDGED) for someday in the future whenever it suites us, thanks for joining us on today's episode of Inside Star Citizen"

@0waverunner0

Жыл бұрын

every time...

@curly_

Жыл бұрын

100000000 x UP

I’m a huge fan of how they showed an unfinished Galaxy model in engine next to a Connie as a size comparison. It’s always nice to see actual in game footage for comparison’s sake instead of relying on third party sites or just guesstimating

@blackworldtraveler3711

Жыл бұрын

Yeah that was important to me.

@Yasma-

Жыл бұрын

@@Bothsidesmakenosense just for the video

@0waverunner0

Жыл бұрын

i highly doubt it was in engine. looks more like an artist pass.

@Jaximumpower

Жыл бұрын

@@0waverunner0 maybe. Even so, showing finished art assets next to it gives a sense of scale that fleetviewer never will

Looks awesome! but it is another concept that we will probably not see flight ready until 5 years later. 😒😒

@tilemacro

Жыл бұрын

What makes you think it will be 5 years? How many sub-capital ships have come out so far? Some are close to being 10 years late.

@Fakaaal

Жыл бұрын

@@tilemacro my bad, correction! Make that 10 years or more.

@tilemacro

Жыл бұрын

@@Fakaaal 👌👌

I like the concept, but just as a reminder: Don't cut slices out of new cakes when you haven't finished the previous ones. There are a bunch of ships that are not sufficiently finished and buggy. I can't really think of buying new ships with good conscience considering how ship releases go. They're pushed out and then not worked on for years. A pretty bad offender is the Argo RAFT, with basically each update something is more broken. (as of 3.17.4) As a consumer, I have to raise a big red flag here. The ships should be in tip top condition. There is no good reason not to polish them up as shiny as possible, apart from functionality that is not in the game yet of course. EDIT: the RAFT issues are: Elevator only works from the outside, meaning you can enter, but not leave the ship. Unless you count the air lock as an exit, but considering how tall the ship is, it's quite the fall. Apart from that it's the most basic thing to be able to enter and leave the ship without having to perform a bungee jump without rope. The lights. Too dim and the light sources are hovering above the ship somewhere. LOD issues. The front right forward thruster is only at the correct location in LOD 0. In any other LOD level it's out of position. Wrong material or wrong lighting on the pilot console. Environmental ground effects are visible inside of the ship. Storage lockers are not working. (HUD misaligned, but that's basically across all of the ships, some worse, some better) When locking doors, there is a chance they won't unlock anymore, trapping you inside. Again an issue most if not all ships with door locks have. Yes, the ship flies and isn't fundamentally broken, but by now, after so many years AT LEAST the ships need to perfect.

@yous2244

Жыл бұрын

Elevator issues got nothing to do with ships. It's elevator issues.

Another concept ship to add to the ever growing backlog. Thanks CIG!

@smok4101

Жыл бұрын

They have another 15 years of work to push those all the concepts out. It's getting to be like a list of 100 solar systems. Can't decide which is has chance of being done first.

Can’t wait to fly this in 20 years

Yes we really need another concept ship!😅

@pogmaster4559

Жыл бұрын

I believe these are seperate teams though, one team built on drawing up ideas and designs etc.

@Chief3filming

Жыл бұрын

@@pogmaster4559 They can allocate resources to different teams more efficiently

@FragRaptor

Жыл бұрын

The minute you stop is the minute they lose all the money invested in the game

@truther6616

Жыл бұрын

Have you seen how many ships are in eve? Ya chew on that

@hitman15857

Жыл бұрын

I'll always take another ship that can have medical capability considering the org I'm part of is dedicated to medical and search and rescue

Nice. Will probably like to fly it in 11 years!

@Fractal379

Жыл бұрын

Original

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

If only making a compelling space sim was as easy as shitposting ...

@rajivroekalea2769

Жыл бұрын

@@uncannyvalley2350 if that would be the case we would have 1000+ ships and never ending game loops with AI that is smarter than Elon Musk with VR that actually moves you into the game like jumanji xd

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

@@rajivroekalea2769 if only Elon was smart to begin with

@rajivroekalea2769

Жыл бұрын

@@uncannyvalley2350 smart business man

Very excited to never see this ship get completed, just like the BMM!

I feel like it's another big ship that is years and years away. So done with big concept ships... as JC pointed out... why work on them when you can get so many smaller ships done, so they just keep getting put on the back burner. :(

@rooster1012

Жыл бұрын

They use every excuse on why they can't work on backlogged ships but this ship has been in production for months.

@Diabolous187

Жыл бұрын

This need to be said more ! How you justify selling a ship of that size with the backlog of ship they need to put out…

@Manta1015

Жыл бұрын

@@rooster1012 Whales are the primary customer that CIG is trying to attract. Everyone else is not, considering all the record-breaking profit numbers each year. Until that dries up, I wouldn't expect it to change.

@danrhodes852

Жыл бұрын

Swear this ship has been in evocati testing? for 3.19 there is a strong chance im wrong but never know

@0waverunner0

Жыл бұрын

@@danrhodes852 its not.

Last one. Now the BMM. Thx.

so it looks nice .. but whats up with the carrack modules ?

It’s got the right name, “Galaxy Class”. I love the nod to Star Trek. I love that it has Polaris and Idris traits. But I am a little jaded with the wait times for these ships. It’s a chunk of a lifetime for each one.

@mozambique9113

Жыл бұрын

its ALL FAKE

I’m not even paying attention to concepts until my railen is in my hangar

aaaaaaand we'll make it in about 15 years at the current pace

"Significant and *real* gameplay loops" 0:57 - that is a very ... particular choice of words?

great. So i can expect Cat modularity to come out before the galaxy is flyable, right ? ... riiight ?:P

A love letter from a Fan, about a Concept Ship. Dear CIG, there is Nothing stopping you, from adding a 4-th & Final Turret on the Top Side of the ship. As well as making the turrets be like the ones on the Redeemer, (The Pilot) can control 1 of the turrets in the front seat. But IF there are people on board, they can Hop Into the Turret Seat & Use the turret. Thus the Pilot Control does NOT stop the turret user. The 2 turrets on the sides of the ship, should be Pilot controlled. But having the Option, to be Remotely taken over from people on the seats in the bridge, would be a nice addition. For such a Massive Ship, No WAY does it have Only 1 size 3 Shield... Also the Top of the ship why does it look so Empty? Turret placement suggestion - where the Bridge area is, can easily be "Extended" or "Fattened" up, to have a Turret In-front of the bridge. (It should be In-front of the bridge) for Balance Reasons. That way the turret will NOT be able to turn Backwards & the ship will still have a Blind Stop on the very Top of the ship. Giving other, smaller ships a weakness to exploit. For the size all of the ship guns should be size 5. Or as an alternative -> Simply Slap a Top-side turret a little Off-center of the ships middle, one that is Manned Only (Like the top turret on the Vanguard) that has the seat going down & then taking you up to the turret, it can be done without making any other changes to the ship, but adding a Door on the ceiling to that turret, like on the Vanguard, Redeemer, Freelancer. If such a turret is to be considered, i think the Bottom side turret near the Nose, needs to be Converted to a Manned Only Turret. Same as my example above. As for my Reasons: Server Blades & Balancing. Server Blades will exist in the future and for better/easier balancing we do Not Want too much Pilot Controlled Firepower. The RSI Galaxy is Compared to the Anvil Carrack, yet the Carrack has a Turret on Top, x2 Sides & Bottom. The Carrack still has the edge over the Galaxy, it has Drones & Map Charter ability (Data running?) I believe that according to Lore, the Carrack has Heavy Armor? (do correct me if i am wrong) Yet we do Not Know IF the Galaxy will have any Armor. It looks like it has armor plating, no? And Yes - i believe the ship has Armor Plating, or at least it looks like it does. I sure hope it has Heavy Armor. Or at least Medium one. Personal wish of mine - The Back side hangar, it can stay the same size it is, but i WISH that the Cargo Module version only, to allow for a "Pass Through" From the Back (Where the Hangar Door is) To the Cargo area -> Giving Room for Multiple Small ships, in Line 1 behind the other. Giving the ship an opportunity to be like a small pocket carrier. Also that would make the Cargo version incredibly Unique. The dimensions seem a little bit off to me. Based on the screenshot next to the Constellation series, the ship looks much bigger. I personally do not mind a Size re-adjustment, making the ship as Big if Not Bigger than the Carrack. If anyone read this, thank you.

Another concept.... just what we needed...

@Velthus

Жыл бұрын

For a large ship no less. Something we won't see for a very, very long time.

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

So dont buy it Just know that many will, and that will help fund the game Don't hate the player

@smashingbrown

Жыл бұрын

@@uncannyvalley2350 and won't be out for another 10 years

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

@@smashingbrown source?

@smashingbrown

Жыл бұрын

@@uncannyvalley2350 Bmm, polaris, kraken, privateer, idris (player controlled), javelin (player controlled), perseus, endeavor, odyssey, orion.... where are they in development?

Modularity is back on the menu then. looks cool, but i'm done buying stuff thats 5 years away.

It's great to hear modularity is coming along. I always thought it was a great idea and would add more variety to the game without having to have new ships for every single thing. I can't even remember which ships were modular at this point though.

CIG always knocks concept designs out of the park. Need to focus on the completion rate now. Variants of existing ships like the Pisces Rescue... is genius.

Incredible ship, can't wait to explore it. Wish it was not a concept but it is quite cool.

Retaliator modules? Carrack modules? Warden BUKs? Naw, new ship more hype more money.

If there is something I am learning from both ships, is that CIG will definitely need to review some parts of the carrack on its gold pass. Mainly the access to the main lift from the hangar and how some of the habitation deck is organized. The big door between hangar and module truly reveals the lack of proper access to the hangar from both the cargo modules and the hospital in the carrack.

@TheRobotMaster1

Жыл бұрын

Exactly. My current plans for the Carrack are to use it as a heavy duty search and rescue. However, the way the medbay and hanger are located kinda makes that difficult. Really hope CIG rework the Carrack. Although I plan on picking up a $5 CCU to the Galaxy with store credit just in case they don't. If CIG doesn't rework the Carrack, the Galaxy would make a perfect replacement for the Carrack for search and rescue.

@0waverunner0

Жыл бұрын

the hangar size, module layout, absolute lack for a second egress point, the one med bed, lights for landing and hangar floods, things that actually function. need i go on....

@BegForMyMercy

Жыл бұрын

Yep, because right now odyssey has the best layout. You cannot even use the medical room in the Carrack... how do you get back and forth? Makes 0 sense. And one ramp? Idgaf what you guys think, Odyssey is 1000% a Carrack killer hands down.

@hagmak

Жыл бұрын

Perhaps in 10 years we will See how the Carrack gold status will look like

@0waverunner0

Жыл бұрын

@@BegForMyMercy haha have to disagree with you there fam.

This show has come a long way. I remember when you were nervous and scruffy, using a spare room to make these videos. Good job and keep up the great work!

'tis a neat ship. May look into getting one once it's in game.

looks like ISC turned into ship shape.

You absolutly nailed the interior on the c8r variant! Props to the team

We thank you for both of these.

More concepts to pile on top of concepts that haven't been worked on.... After being burned on a few concept ships, I won't put any more into concepts

So when is the Constellation getting a rework? It's really showing it's age now compared to newer designs and the struts!

Really great work im really looking forward to the RSi day

@ScumAndVillains

Жыл бұрын

It's a concept. You won't be able to fly this ship in years.

@wanderelfe

Жыл бұрын

if you think so

Very excited for the Polaris!

Yall got the Perfect combination ! Centrally located Bridge and the freaking hanger facing backwards! I been waiting on a ship to have that forever, it's the perfect location for a hanger Bay ! Can't wait to get my hands on this! 🤗😁

@blackworldtraveler3711

Жыл бұрын

I can see many happy with this type of ship.

@arenomusic

Жыл бұрын

This is by far my favorite arrangement for sub capital/capital ships with a hangar and bridge

@Yasma-

Жыл бұрын

who knows when is going to be ready, I bet it will be forgotten like many other concepts

@blackworldtraveler3711

Жыл бұрын

@@Yasma- Heck I forgotten many of the ships already in the game I don't own. The concepts I bought is my desktop backgrounds.

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

@@Yasma- feel free to not be here

"I know we sold you modular ships 8 yrs ago and didn't release them or make the ones we did make modular, but how about this new modular ship for $600+."

I want a crusader light fighter that's similar to how the glaive is I feel like bigger guns, big engines and, sleek designs are what crusader does best, especially the spirit style love that.

@SiPPOSiT

Жыл бұрын

Yes! I would even love a Crusader light fighter in the same weight class as the gladius and arrow

Thanks for everything you do! May The Force Be With You!

I've been wanting an Avenger ambulance but the C8 works too. The interior looks really great, and as a Hercules owner it would be great to fly around with a C8R in it. Pretty excited for the Galaxy! It's essentially a flying office building with swappable work areas and this looks to be on the way of becoming my favorite multicrew ship in the 100m range.

I've possibly never been less excited then this about a new concept ship release. yeah it looks fine, please start working on finishing the bmm, polaris and perseus

This… just looks almost exactly like the Elite Dangerous Anaconda with some Python elements mixed in. I’m all for some more space wedges though!

Good to see modularity is still alive. I'm anxious for when we can swap modules in and out for all the modular ships.

I was going to buy myself a TV for black Friday. After watching this, my heart said, "Disregard television, acquire spaceship"

@urghfas7843

Жыл бұрын

🤣👍

@alexandrep4913

Жыл бұрын

You won't get this ship until 2027. Just wait and use that money on something you need or want now (or within a year). By time this ship comes, youll find coins in the couch to make up for the supposed savings you get, buying in concept.

@harrisoncortis8416

Жыл бұрын

dude for real get the tv, the spaceship will do nothing for AT LEAST 5-10 years. You can always buy it later

@killerkram1337

Жыл бұрын

@@harrisoncortis8416 mostly a joke for thumbs up. im getting both

For me, looks aside, it's even better (as far as flexibility goes) than a Connie because you can choose which snub u wanna take with you for each ocasion: C8X / C8R / 85x, Merlin... And it's modular! Nice one

I'm thankful for the ISC you guys bring us every week.Happy Thanksgiving!

@CaptainMcFly1

Жыл бұрын

never missed a show since I start playing SC back in April 2019

love the galaxy and I can't wait to see what you have in store for us next week with the Polaris update.

In the C8R medical console, there are two green buttons labeled C1 and C2 that open small cubby holes. What are they for? Also, next to the glass door and to the left of the counter, there is a spot that looks like something is missing. Is this for a fire extinguisher?

Getting concepts are good ... flyable ships are better .... gameplay is best. At this point I just hope SQ42 to finish soon, and when it does, PU in a reasonable state for first impression of people that get out of SQ42

@maximalDruck

Жыл бұрын

Is it though? o.O

@Rummyson

Жыл бұрын

once 4.0 releases, we should see the patch to Beta. Because almost all the backend tech will be online. Then when SQ42 releases, those teams will move over to the PU, and we will see a flood of content coming.

@Cozmox874

Жыл бұрын

@@Rummyson this is extremely optimistic

@Rummyson

Жыл бұрын

@@Cozmox874 not really, whats slowed development down so much is backend tech. They spent years just working on the game engine. I been following this game since the original kickstarter. Content is easy to make when all the backend tech is done and their tools are finished. We are at the tail end of all that backend development. 3.18 is bringing PES online, and 4.0 is bringing the Server Meshing online.

I hope they do a rework of the constellation series soon, that was also supposed to be "modular".

the "i'm an unicorn" t-shirt is gold, love it.

Nice work, thanks again!

Make sure to add 50 more ships before actually launching the game

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

The game is launched I'm playing it now

Great, another concept ship like the BMM...

@VoidSector

Жыл бұрын

most die de bek hol'n.

@mainframehardcore

Жыл бұрын

@@VoidSector eerstvolgende in de verse en je krijgt een overdose.

"I was asking if you've ever been aboard a Galaxy class starship before, Sir." I'm looking forward to seeing what the RSI Universe class might be. XD

those triangle sharp shape that goes all the way to the nose of the Galaxy, kinda reminds me a bit on Star Wars destroyer ship, its not exactly the same but you get the idea lol

Galaxy gives out the ISD vibes... And I love it. Well done, CIG

The C8R is amazing! Great Work Guys ❤

@computergeeq360

Жыл бұрын

can't bed log in it :(

@Yasma-

Жыл бұрын

@@computergeeq360 is not a sleeping bed is a medical bed.

@computergeeq360

Жыл бұрын

@@Yasma- you telling me you can't sleep in a medical bed? well better go send everyone home thats in the hospital so they can go home to bed

"Modularity"...the word used for ships that will never be completed, or at least not in a looooong time. Retaliator? Vanguard? Carrack? Such modules, much wow.

PLEASE PLEASE CIG: From inside the bridge I would love to watch missiles launch from the front of the ship at a 45 degree angle - kind of like a ocean warship would with vertical launchers. That would look amazing! I suggest 45 degrees instead of straight up because there could probably be a friendly ship right above me. Also launching at the pace that some earth warship missiles do would be fantastic - first it shoots up a bit, then it corrects its angle, then it flies off full speed.

I think when the pyro and it's supporting systems come online. There will be so much content we won't know how to deal with it. Concept ships included.

@durtwarrior1142

Жыл бұрын

With 50 people per servers 😂

@urghfas7843

Жыл бұрын

@@durtwarrior1142 very old info dude - maybe play the game, instead of making yourself awkward 🤣🤣

@uncannyvalley2350

Жыл бұрын

@@durtwarrior1142 it's at 100 now derpy. What an edgelord

@durtwarrior1142

Жыл бұрын

@@uncannyvalley2350 What a joke. Most shooters can handle that.

@durtwarrior1142

Жыл бұрын

@@urghfas7843 Why would I? I need a 3000$+ computer just to nearly have 30 fps.

you have 40+ ships in concept, when are you going to make them?

Well, the Galaxy is a home run. If you had offered an exploration variant, you would have had a great contender with the Carrack, but the three modules are still pretty great. Well done CIG.

This ship remembers me of the Elite Dangerous's Anaconda -- a very, very big Anaconda...

Ready for next week but as always, a wonderful episode. Happy turkey day and be safe ❤️👊🏻

Absolutly insane.... since the Perseus and then the Scorpius.... RSIs new styleguide nails everything..... Star Destroyer goes to Star Citizen and modularity included.... Just overwhelming....

@austin6174

Жыл бұрын

We will see gal before Perseus… the backlog has low priority

@urghfas7843

Жыл бұрын

@@austin6174 when they come, doesnt matter and which one first is also unimportant - they will come, thats the only important thing - and to release in 3-5 years, they will both be ready, i guess

@slavenmatuhina2151

Жыл бұрын

@@austin6174 Perseus is mentioned in SQ42 lore so I presume they will need it for SQ42 hence it should be more of a priority then Galaxy but no one can say for sure.

This will make for a great all round support ship for larger ships. It can be a hospital ship, a resupply ship, and a refinery ship for turning resources into usable building materials and/or fuel for your ships and other functions.

I have a POWERFUL NEED! I am also stoked to hear more about the return of modularity!