*Thank you for watching. This video is a part of a four-part CNBC Tech series on eVTOLS. You can check out the other parts below:* • What are eVTOLS? The evolution of 'flying cars' explained - kzread.info/dash/bejne/aZuApKypntCnn5s.html • Inside Alef, the company trying to build a car you can both drive and fly - kzread.info/dash/bejne/o6iu165sh7bPd7w.html • Take a ride inside Ehang’s fully autonomous, two-seater air taxi - kzread.info/dash/bejne/inZ305iDd67Xhco.html

I really hope Lilium can commercialize before going bankrupt

@Apfellll

Ай бұрын

I really hope they go bankrupt before they become a court case

@jean-marcducommun8185

Ай бұрын

The endless experimental flight highly efficient at burning investors money.

@mhaz1862

Ай бұрын

You're the one who'll bankrupt first 😂

@jean-marcducommun8185

Ай бұрын

This project makes me think: When woke people become engineers. Fits mindset of „Energiewende in Deutschland“.

@mcbrite

Ай бұрын

Commercialize to DO WHAT??? This is inferior to both the plane AND the heli...

This is the most beautiful and inspired EVTOL craft I've seen. I truly want them to win.

Proud Investor ❤🎉

@techtravels401

Ай бұрын

You are an avid future believer

Aviation will be one of the last industries to fully electrify, but it will happen. The transition will start from the bottom with smaller short-haul aircraft and work its way up. Designing from scratch is way more optimal than converting existing aircraft. Lilium looks like they are doing awesome work. These kinds of companies are the future, and the future will be clean, sustainable, and less noisy.

@Madikon07

Ай бұрын

Its not necessary to electrify all sectors because it will increase the reliance on China due to supply chains that mostly mined in that country therefore your claim is baseless and intended with the aim of destroying the West

@trnogger

Ай бұрын

I think it might actually be one of the earlier ones. Aviation is very centralised and mostly owned by larger businesses which are much more open to cost-saving innovation than private users or small businesses. And fuel costs are THE cost driver in aviation, electrification is not only an environmental question but has a significant economic incentive. Another hurdle to electrification is the availability of recharging infrastructure which is much easier to provide at airports and helicopter landing pads, compared to cars/trucks or even ships.

@rayray8687

18 күн бұрын

⁠@@trnogger: Of course everyone seems to forget that most of the electricity used to run EVs of any kind is produced by burning fossil fuels in the first place with various extra losses of efficiency along the way so until that’s corrected the entire process is a fool’s paradise - there is no benefit to the environment and there is no economic benefit. Better to just burn the fuels directly in the engine, don’t you think?

@hitesh6245

13 күн бұрын

I think even before that comes up, we might end with more viable and powerful batteries running on h2.

@kerrytodd3753

11 күн бұрын

Delusional…..money grab

Great Video and very interesting Company! :)

Everybody should look at using a Tether cart to launch. Look what that might do for your overall operations if you were able to get off the ground and gain some speed before you went to full battery. If you wanna make a standard aircraft that isn’t EVTOL but electric that make carts to launch and land them so they don’t have to have any undercarriage. we also need to make portable landing zones so people like first responders can pull one out of the back of their vehicle. Set it in a clear spot and make sure the area stays clear communicating with the aircraft. LIDAR, Light, set light Internet connection in one package. We need the same thing around the world to make cheap landing zones that are safe.

i would always worry when they move very quickly on from the propulsion details to emphasise the fact that you will be able to have a trim finish in whatever style you want.

I’m enjoying following the lLillium journey. Like any new pioneer lots of head winds and pessimism, however I can see the vision.

Here we see the "lift" design. Create low pressure on top of the wing, over a wide area. Having multiple engines makes for safety, and controlled variable performance.

Selling to the rich will never go out of fashion ✅

Great German engineering skills!

@n1vca

29 күн бұрын

no, it barely flies as an empty model ... most Canadian RC hobbyists can do better than that

1400 Million € and no flying, real size prototype in 9 years!

@starseed8087

26 күн бұрын

"AI how long did it take to develop the helicopter?" Answer: "The development of the helicopter has a long history. The idea of the rotorcraft, which characterizes the helicopter, was already known in ancient China and was used in the “Flying Top” toy 2,500 years ago. Leonardo da Vinci made the first sketches of flying machines around 1487-1490. But it wasn't until the 20th century that the development of helicopters really took off. It ultimately took over 500 years until the helicopter was “perfected” in its current form and flight dynamics."

Turn the background music volume up, I can still hear the guys talking.

Omg I literally thought that was Thomas from the car channel for a while, they sound exactly alike! 2:45 😂

@flippert0

22 күн бұрын

It's almost as if they are both German ?!?

Do a fully loaded test flight!

I’m really not sure about that pilot UI screen. As some who drives a new car with a similar screen that fails and turns off randomly I would prefer to see some analog tech for the pilot but maybe there’s a second set of controls.

i am an investor....pretty heavily...i would love to have a version for MSFS to fly virtual.....

but at what cost?

First, great respect that Lilium refers to other companies as "peers" and not "competitors"! All for a cleaner, quieter, more exciting future!

@TheBagOfHolding

Ай бұрын

Fellow hornswogglers.

@bendo7418

4 күн бұрын

...that will never happen, except in glossy brochures :P

Love the green suit! 👌🏾

It's definitely fcev fueling. Battery components are hard & fuel cell flies 2 1/2 times longer and can carry way more being much liter.

Awesome!

Imagine your 100's of feet in the air on a business video call and the battery catches fire 🔥 🤔

But is this fuel efficient when landing and take off? VTOL's buggest problem is it uses too much energy/fuel when it takes off and land.

When others busy try to kill each other,,this team create new tech..

Lilium❤

Looks Nice

Future technology looks like this

Test flight is sheduled later this year. 🎉

And how does it do in icing conditions ?

@RogueReplicant

7 күн бұрын

It doesn't.

I wish i could train to fly these cool jets.

I love Lilium ❤❤❤

@JohnWerner-te5zy

22 күн бұрын

I love Lithium

It seems CNBC didn't see the thing fly in Wessling. Did any journalist ever fly with it or at least film a crew doing a test flight?

@CNBCi

Ай бұрын

Not in Wessling, but we were there for the test flight in Spain: kzread.info/dash/bejne/X65pzs6jabW7hsY.html

@TheBagOfHolding

Ай бұрын

​@CNBCi an unmanned remote control small prototype isn't the same

The sooner eVTOLs arrive, the better. I want flying cars so bad!😫

@pedroreis2095

Ай бұрын

evtols are not flying cars , they are meant to be a taxi service and not a private flying car, because if everyone has it the traffic will not decrease

@RoseSupreme

Ай бұрын

@@pedroreis2095 To you, maybe. In my eyes, they look like humanity's first true step into realizing one of sci-fi's most iconic and desired tropes.

Go Lilium ❤

Let's go lilm

You are not being honest, what provides the thrust?

Wow,, Future of Aviation, Well Done.

@n1vca

29 күн бұрын

This has no near future, if you want to see future, look at their competitors

electric aviation needs much lighter but powerful batteries...innovation currently ongoing...better battery chemistries

Lilium has the best technology for EVTOL's but, they need to move a little faster towards commercialization.

@maxi-g

Ай бұрын

such an american statement

@dasmaurerle4347

Ай бұрын

That's not how German companies work...🤦

@n1vca

29 күн бұрын

What exactly is best on a prototype after 10 years that can barely fly empty? It has never been lifting a single person - its just a large RC prototype The nice looking stuff with seats has never been flying at all - great technology🤣

Finally! The jetsons are coming soon

@bendo7418

4 күн бұрын

yes. always just 2 years ago...since 10 years. who in his right mind still believes that crappy PR?

It's a design and marketing company. Any experienced engineer will confirm how inefficient and wasteful it is under the hood. A decade in the making and still no figures reported about the workload.

@ovariantrolley2327

Ай бұрын

Specifics?

@n1vca

29 күн бұрын

@ziad_jkhan Totally agree with you

@ziad_jkhan

29 күн бұрын

@@ovariantrolley2327 It's more about the lack of specific. Again, there has been zero disclosure of the workload carried during the tests or the energy consumed. Ten years went by and hundreds of articles and videos were published but we still don't have access to the most basic information.

...and everybody else in GA still flying leaded gasoline. xD ...lets hope this tech evolves and adapts fast. And maybe also bring out a 4 seater for about 500k - 1mio €....

@gj9157

Ай бұрын

sure hope so

Not necessarily for everyone for the forseeable future, but definetly something worth investing into. At the time pilots would be replaced by AI, this might even become a highend public transportation vehicle for say otherwise hard to reach places or should mass production become really cheap overall for anyone. Just not with human pilots.

I’ve been watching this company for a decade. Yall are late.

….our business model, hmm…, is to grasp as much public funding as possible…

Wow

Easily one of the most unique and efficient EVTOL designs, but this video doesn't even talk about the mechanics...

this is such a beautiful design, just wish it went flat to the ground for wheel chair access.

Its a scam.

@koba_Lyle

17 күн бұрын

What did you do buy the IPO?

this is a fluff piece.. what is an electric jet motor, how does it work, it sounds revolutionary

@ericmaglio

Ай бұрын

It's a fairly simple electric ducted fan. They call them "jets" for exactly the reason you've noticed - to make it sound like they're doing revolutionary things.

@greg_289

Ай бұрын

@@ericmaglio No. They’ve explained previously. They call them jets because they’re enclosed in nacelles, like a jet engine.

@CNBCi

Ай бұрын

We walk through some of the different eVTOL designs in our explainer, which came out earlier this month: kzread.info/dash/bejne/aZuApKypntCnn5s.html

I bought lilium stocks for 10 bucks. Looking forward to becoming a millionaire in 2030

@koba_Lyle

17 күн бұрын

Bad buy in. Look at any tech or manufacturing stock and you should know you will have dozens of chances to buy in for under $1 per share

I hope you become huge. The Volkswagen of electric flight.

@longus9671

Ай бұрын

The Mercedes of electric flight

@waynerussell6401

Ай бұрын

NONE OF THE OLD OEMS HAVE MANAGED TO SUCCEED COMMERICAILLY IN ELECTRIFICATION! ONLY ONE COMPANY HAS AND ITS CEO HAS PROMISED TO MAKE A VERTICAL TAKEOFF AND LANDING SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT IF NOBODY ELSE DOES!

No hard facts such as range. What to do at the end of usefull batterie life of 8-ish jears?

Solid State Batteries. Nuclear Battery

How can they be a "leading eVTOL company" when they haven't even created a prototype that has been flying with a single pilot/passenger? I thought CNBC had some journalistic standards, like doing research and presenting facts? Instead its just an ad trying to keep the investors on board.🙄 Since 10 years are looking at an "RC plane" that can't fly with a single person on board and are annually pretending to sell a 6 or more seater very soon? Its also not a jet unless you call your blow dryer a jet as well ... its a ducted fan ... just like an inefficiently small propeller inside a tube. I am really waiting for the day they can finally present one of two people on board and make it fly some 30-40km, then I'll start to take them serious.

USD 9 -7 million..!?

@gj9157

Ай бұрын

For the rich as expected

@ThomasHofmann

6 күн бұрын

9 m for the luxury pioneer edition

Can it fly?

@longus9671

Ай бұрын

no it drive

@n1vca

29 күн бұрын

Not with a single person on board and not past line of sight

It’s amazing--it’s pretty arrogant to have one pilot in a commercial aircraft.

@rayray8687

18 күн бұрын

Pretty much all small aircraft only require a single pilot.

If this revolutionizes air travel, I will make a pilgrimage to Santiago de Compostela. All these startups do is burn money. Have we not seen countless examples of this?

EHANG is the much better bet on the EVTOL industry

@ThomasHofmann

6 күн бұрын

Ehang is a big drone, nothing special. They wont get Easa and Faa certified within the next years

you can’t take a lithium battery on board an aircraft, but you can use one to power it 🤣🤣

@n1vca

29 күн бұрын

In their development stages they already had a model burn out - I guess they take high current lines seriously now

Why the range is not mentioned. Welp everyone knows. Enter range anxiety in air.

@viewer-of-content

Ай бұрын

Range Anxiety is already one of the biggest issues in aviation. It's why the USA banned trans-oceanic twin engine jets for most of the 1900s, and why several models don't fly transpacific fights. An e-mobility plane not talking about range when Boeing and Airbus lead there marketing materials with range is laughable. Domestic flights are a huge market, so even if this e-jet has crap range they could sell 200 private jets given a big Walmart order or something similar. Walmart has all of their regional managers fly in and out of Arkansas every week, and they go to like 3-4 remote rural cities in the usa a week to check on operations. Other businesses would buy a lot of e-jets too, but you got to give them range if you want to compete against bombardier or lier jets

@saulgoodman2018

Ай бұрын

Because it's garbage.

@stickynorth

Ай бұрын

It's meant as urban helicopter replacement... So think lots of short point to point flights from say Calabasas to LAX or Montauk to Manhattan... I believe it's 300 km range, 300 km/h... So something like that...

@JoeyBlogs007

Ай бұрын

They are loosing big money and running out of angel investors to rescue them from their miserable fate.

@JoeyBlogs007

Ай бұрын

Orders with lots of exit clauses for the doubtful purchasers.

Has a long history in aerospace industry- but we don’t talk about that.

I've seen the scooter batteries blow. I couldn't imagine these

That’s one fancy comb.

@EleanorPeterson

Ай бұрын

Some people might think the last word in your Comment should begin with a letter 'B', or even a 'T'... (Just kidding. Or am I?🤔)

Jet? How can it be called "Electric jet"?!

You couldn’t ask how they source their lithium and other materials? It doesn’t matter if you’re carbon neutral when flying if you’re destroying the ocean floors and stealing from and ruining indigenous communities with the lithium mining. Just a thought on how you could probe at more important questions than just “are you carbon neutral?”.

Don't use cheap stuff made from China or else u ain't gonna be billionaires. Customers safety is always come first.

wenn ich Wasserstoff schon höre,.. wie real ist denn dann das Ganze,..

@n1vca

29 күн бұрын

An der Stelle kann Wasserstoff wirklich Sinn machen, auch wenn es dann noch teurer wird, aber bei den ineffizienten Triebwerken mußt Du extrem viel Strom liefern, was mit aktuellen Akkus und dem unglücklichen Leistungsgewicht quasi nicht möglich ist - da ist Wasserstoff tatsächlich eine Option.

Do we NEED it?

@fireteamomega7

Ай бұрын

There will be no traffic if everyone if flying.

@seokjin3000

Ай бұрын

Who's "we"?

Better than Tesla! That is the future! No car anymore!

😮😮😮

Nothing new in this video all old stof, when do we see one flying withe a real person onbord.

how can you spent almost 500 million for that, and now you want tax money wtf?

NO... Just no... we don't need private vertical takeoff vehicles... Why? I DON'T WANT TO LIVE NEXT TO AN AIRPORT. And if all my neighbors get one of these, I will live next to an airport...

I think this is a scam.

@ssuwandi3240

Ай бұрын

Insurance alone wouldn't be a viable model

What ever this is, it's not journalism.

It will zero emissions without battery 😂😂

Lithium ion batteries? The same batteries that cause 25 of every 100k electric cars to catch fire? No thanks.

😂right, 45 minutes of electric power....when the battery is brand new, it's not too cold, and you don't spend too much time hovering. Flying VFR FAA/EASA requires you to retain 30 minutes of flight time AT Destination....for a reason. That's at best a 15 minute mission. A zero minute if you fly IFR. But battery are getting better and cheaper, right ? Well why do regular people turn their back on them ? At least you don't have to a lift an entire Tesla ou VW to make the journey, and the only penalty to drain out the battery is to park on the side of the road, and the only casualty, self-esteem...this is balloony, all about Vr, design, (AI anyone), and btw carbon is NOT light, it's stiff and strong...if you actually use them properly, in heavy loaded aerostructures, otherwise, plywood or wood &fabric, or even aluminium is a much lighter option. This is a graphic design-driven project, not a rationale engineering choice.

@TheBagOfHolding

Ай бұрын

There is no way they can get 5 minutes at full size with a load.

Why are you flogging this failing stock?

Why they do not use Solid Hydrogen as their power source is suspect. Surely they know this is the only way to achieve extended flight times, yet they and others do they not use it? Why? Suppressed by Big Oil?

That company seems to have a great product but its all bla bla and no product in sight

Can't even get to 200 mile range.

1:07 Someone tell him that you don't drive planes.

Tencent has stake in lilium

@saulgoodman2018

Ай бұрын

So.

@JoeyBlogs007

Ай бұрын

Soon to be known as 5 cent.

@kingmidas7170

Ай бұрын

Gogogo Joey :'D

There will be quite a bit of Maydays.

@kradius2169

Ай бұрын

Fixed 3 stages of flight: > Range-xiety > Pan-Pan > M'aidez

whata bullshit idea

Big fail

There is no such thing as zero emission. You just move the emissions to another place. We need to go completely nuclear, not electric. Nuclear is the greenest and safest source of energy.

@beyondfossil

Ай бұрын

LMAO. A ZEV has zero emissions during operation which is huge milestone for any vehicle considering the huge amounts of operating emissions otherwise from fossil fuel vehicles. Electricity can be produced from recyclable renewable technology which is some of the lowest emission power technologies available that are only getting cleaner.

@GinnyGlider

Ай бұрын

"Safest" Perhaps In terms of their operation track record but their severity remains at the catastrophic level. Even then the storage management (or disposal) of nuclear waste alone poses a significant safety hazard. - The development of nuclear fusion could offset some of these severities compared to traditional nuclear fission. I say "could offset" since it's still in the experimental stage meaning there are uncertainties still left unknown... - Of course, obviously, this is all (hopefully) accounted for, with the current and future nuclear safety methods especially the need in the pace of Innovation of reducing these hazardous cases.

@beyondfossil

Ай бұрын

​@@GinnyGlider Yes, "catastrophic" is the operative word here. Nuclear power is the only form of energy that can produce catastrophic 20,000+ year variety. It's not just the immediate effects either. There are long-term psychosomatic effects even if one is only near the radiation zone. Villages and towns near or downwind of irradiated zones (Chernobyl, Fukushima-Daiichi) will be especially prone to this. Because, for decades later, every lump in their throat or body will cause them to wonder if it's the start of a cancerous growth because of their proximity. Constant fear is no way to live. Long term effects of nuclear may not be known for decades either. If a person died of cancer 30+ years after, how can we know how much of that was related to long-term exposure? they could have avoided the cancer altogether perhaps. The accounting of causation may be masked by decades of time. People are well aware of this. All communities will have a large section of residents that will fight against a new nuclear plant anywhere near their neighborhoods. Nuclear power will come against NIMBY to the extreme. Add that to the long construction times and huge budget overruns.

@z33r0now3

Ай бұрын

If you are still not supposed to eat game or mushrooms from the wood near you because Russia fucked up more than 30 years ago, you might find yourself thinking differently.

😂 yet another “ revolution in air travel “ crap story … moller Skycar started this scam and it really has worked out well… 😂😂😂

Lets not pretend. They are going broke and running out of angle investors.

@JoeyBlogs007

Ай бұрын

Orders with lots of exit clauses for the doubtful purchasers.

@kingmidas7170

Ай бұрын

The best thing that could ever happen to me is pessimistic people like you, Joey. Without such people the price would be much higher. Luckily it hasn't been for the last 4 months and I was able to get in cheap :) Thank you very much and please continue to be pessimistic

@Dave_Sisson

Ай бұрын

Joey, I notice you have made a heap of comments on this video, all of them negative and all of them have been downvoted to the bottom of the list. We all see videos we don't like and perhaps give one negative comment, but there has to be a reason for so many negative comments from you. So I have to ask why you are so passionately against this company? Did someone who works there do something nasty to you?

@karlburmeister1552

Ай бұрын

@@Dave_Sisson The fact that they are using l-ion is a major issue. 25 per 100k electric cars catch fire. When this happens in the air it will be far more catastrophic. Battery powered human/cargo flight will require far better batteries. They wouldn't have a hard time finding investors if these prototypes had a significant amount of field testing under load in varied conditions. I'm not counting them out completely, nor am I a pessimist. My great grand uncle was taught to fly by Wilbur and Orville Wright and is in the Canadian aviation hall of fame. He believed in reasonable risk as do I. I just think that certain hurdles need to be cleared which are not being addressed, not at least in this video.

Yeah they been spruiking this snake oil for years. It's an accident waiting to happen. 10 million for a range of what ??? 150 miles. They don't even have a full scale test model yet after all these years. Snake Oil. Design is flawed. One major power outage and it's doomed. No control surfaces !!!

@JoeyBlogs007

Ай бұрын

Orders with lots of exit clauses for the doubtful purchasers.

@Y2Kvids

Ай бұрын

One major outage ... there would be redundancies and motors are very reliable

@animemadnese

Ай бұрын

It's the FUTURE

When they'll crash or jam midair, how many will die below?

@cybertruck2008

Ай бұрын

Dont worry, if you wear a seatbelt. You will be fine

@karlburmeister1552

Ай бұрын

@@cybertruck2008 ... and a helmet on the ground.

@n1vca

29 күн бұрын

no they will not, because its probably never going to fly with people on board within the next years

once there comes first, the second is a CHEAT, you know which.

We already have flying car, we call them elicopters