Ma'am it is just torture as a Law student. 😢

Indira Jaisingh has almost single-handedly fought for the Constitution .

@satishkumar7184

Ай бұрын

@normanalbuquerque3

Ай бұрын

Yes I agree but the NGOS are just barking

@normanalbuquerque3

Ай бұрын

She is a very good lawyer and understands and interprets the laws better

@dr.nkgrover

Ай бұрын

Really, a boot licker of congis

@jujuthsukumarchakraborty1900

Ай бұрын

We know well what Indira standards for. She stands for FRAUDISM ONLY.

Genuine request from honest citizen of the country.

Salute to respected ma'am 🎉🎉🎉 Thank you. Everyone see the face of civil liberty...and note she is doing these acts for us.

Tuely it should not be enforced as it is draconian law

Laws pushed through when Opposition was suspended. Where was the discussion.

@dr.nkgrover

Ай бұрын

Opposition can't face, so they run away after creating ruckus

@alvonnashortt170

Ай бұрын

Corrupt criminals gay Modi and Amit Shah criminal mindedly suspended the opposition so they can bring these laws easily to the parliament

She is right . There is going to be more chaos . India definitely needs Educated leaders .

@dr.nkgrover

Ай бұрын

Are you educated?😊

@AveragepoliticsEnjoyer

Ай бұрын

​@@dr.nkgroverYou definitely aren't

@dr.nkgrover

Ай бұрын

@@AveragepoliticsEnjoyer Hope you are. Good luck 🤞

@AveragepoliticsEnjoyer

Ай бұрын

@@dr.nkgrover Asking ridiculous questions

The laws passed by previous government of Modi ji were not in the interest of common people of this country instead of New criminal law they could have increase numbers of judges in High court and supreme court as well in lower courts to lessen the pending cases but they are less interested in people's to get justice as early as possible

@raravamudan4002

Ай бұрын

Cases run for 30 to 40 years no judgement only dates and fees for lawyers your discussion is not for common man but for accused. Liberty for the accused is the priority not the victim. The more comfortable a criminal is with law the more liberal the country. Who is comfortable with courts the criminal or victim just find out .

She will oppose new laws for obvious reasons. She is happy in the existing system and have no intention of improving the existing lethargic and indifferent approach adopted by judges. Why don't SC comes out with the desired amendments with a vie to IMPROVE the existing system.

@raravamudan4002

Ай бұрын

Cases run for 30 to 40 years no judgement only dates and fees for lawyers your discussion is not for common man but for accused. Liberty for the accused is the priority not the victim. The more comfortable a criminal is with law the more liberal the country. Who is comfortable with courts the criminal or victim just find out .

The criminal law amendment is not a generalized one, the name of the act is not understandable. It's obvious that the BJP is fascist and acting in favor of a sect of people.

Thank you Jaising advocate for explaining to the Nation. May our CJI can do for differing the implementation.

Genuine request from all legal fraternities, please take the initiative and challenge the same before hon’ble supreme courts

I totally agree with Ms jaising.

04:30India today has lost all the credibility with it's exit poll disastrous event, so called journalist saying stakeholders were consulted good response given by Lawyer.

@muralidhar4844

Ай бұрын

She emphasizing on the concensus of all stake holders. Life and liberty are pivotal given by constitution

2:59 Wrong Information RTIs filed by Article 14 News Shows High Courts Weren't Consulting The Part and Aren't Providing Answer and Consulted on Tech in Kerala and Delhi with certain sections recommended, how have the consulted victims and accused what journalistic ethics is this of running a legal awareness channel by Godi Media infiltration.

Sec. 531(2)(a) of BNSS clearly provides that only CrPC will continue to apply to pending cases as if BNSS had not come into force.

She admits, earlier there is no law on the impact of sovereignty and integrity of India under sedition 124a. She is worried that the new law talks about impact on sovereignty and integrity of India under sedition 124a. She is worried about rioters / culprits who impact sovereignty and integrity of India will be punished under new Laws 😂.

@rajashashankgutta4334

Ай бұрын

Please define this "impact on sovereignty and integrity of india". It's sound very vague and there is a high possibility that government gonna misuse this law to harass it's critics.

Who is responsible for the delay?

Either the law minister should throw the letter of Jaisingh to dustbin or return it to her.

Well done Mam really this new law confused many.

Such condition ( transformational cause ) shall prevail whenever new enactment shall be applied. Even the Hon'ble CJI applauded these three criminal law recently. The pendency of criminal litigation in district courts can not be attributed to the legislatures.

The criminal law amendment is not a generalized one, the name of the act is not understandable. It's obvious that the BJP is fascist and acting in favor of a sect of people. The law has to be revisited in parliament and needs deep deliberations before implementation. I salute Senior Advocate Madam Indira Jaising for her audacious voice against the unjust. 🙏🙏🙏

@raravamudan4002

Ай бұрын

Cases run for 30 to 40 years no judgement only dates and fees for lawyers your discussion is not for common man but for accused. Liberty for the accused is the priority not the victim. The more comfortable a criminal is with law the more liberal the country. Who is comfortable with courts the criminal or victim just find out .

Court time Span may extend the time span of accused 😂😂

Article 21 is the guiding principle of this Nation even though the police never obey or enforce or follow that .

It is most nonsense to say consult the accused before framing criminal laws

Madam That's exactly that will help the government.the more two people fight and argue, the third person wins. This is a huge mess. India will go back 100 years. But Indian people are ok with all this if jai shree ram is said. Instead of straightening out existing issues nowt there is a huge huge new elephant that is being brought inside just to create an impression that they are changing things for the better

I am basically against calling them in Hindi names instead of the current century old English names. This is certainly contrary to any principles of basic federalism and the Constitutional provisions even now existing and relevant that English shall be the language of High Courts and Supreme Court. TDP and RJD should pressurize Mr Modi to take them back. The old laws in old names are more than enough.

@rajashashankgutta4334

Ай бұрын

Other than DMK no one has any problem with hindi names.

It is better to establish more courts instead of new Law . This changes or new Law going to be a burden for the nation.

Please mam! Provide me all application copies send to various chief justice of high court and chief justice of India by you

@dr.nkgrover

Ай бұрын

She just gives interviews to remain in limelight

@raravamudan4002

Ай бұрын

Cases run for 30 to 40 years no judgement only dates and fees for lawyers your discussion is not for common man but for accused. Liberty for the accused is the priority not the victim. The more comfortable a criminal is with law the more liberal the country. Who is comfortable with courts the criminal or victim just find out .

Its strange to suggest that the accused should have been consulted before the the news laws were decided.

Was accused consulted how bizaare??????

@AshokKumar-ep8kk

Ай бұрын

FIRST LISTEN WHAT SHE IS SAYING CAREFULLY

@AveragepoliticsEnjoyer

Ай бұрын

​@@AshokKumar-ep8kkandhbhakts don't listen

Which law enacted by Parliament/assembly is consulted with all the stakeholders and in this case as Smt. India Jaisingh wants all lawyers, judges, journalists, accused, petitioners etc to be consulted. These lawyers are great in the Tarik-pe-Tarikh scheme and they want to apply the same here. Well done for trying, but law will take its due course. Why don’t you propose that all courts give a citizen charter which will lay out procedures of all cases from lower courts to SC will be completed in 5 years. Lawyers make money by adjournments and want the system to flourish

Cause is right ,need to educate all and demand to gov .

Amazing speaker Mam

🎉 DURING TRANSITION OF CHANGE IN LAWS..THERE WILL BE PARALLEL SYSTEMS..EG.. CHANGE IN PUNISHMENT UNDER POSCO ACT..

In the new law, the order of the clauses has been changed, there is no other special amendment. If there is a few amendments, the amendment would have been made and the original law would have been kept in the same position, all the issues would have been resolved.

As per this lady no good law should be introduced…..jaisa chal raha chalne Do…inke hisaab se saare criminal activity 30 june se band ho jaye….pehle purane sab case khatam ho tab crime kare

Íts is Goverment policy delayed the cases So that Government get more money These days carrying out criminal case s Very expensive

@AEdward-ve4wt

Ай бұрын

The law is to protect their rapists and criminals.

@normanalbuquerque3

Ай бұрын

Don't think so Confirm which laws apply

@normanalbuquerque3

Ай бұрын

Every police officers government advocates and others make money but laws applies to common men

@dr.nkgrover

Ай бұрын

Judges don't work and you blame the government. Follish

@alvonnashortt170

Ай бұрын

​@@AEdward-ve4wtyou right so when they are caught they give money to Modi or they become jumping jacks MP's and jump into BJP to escape

Only need to insert aur deletion sections, nothing need to do disturb sections series

Sooner or later the transition has to take place. For sometime there would be some bit of confusion. But in the effective enforcement of the new laws the court judgements would be faster.

She doesn't want any new law

Well put Ma'am

Seems will soon attend the gravity of seriousness like Kisan Andolan against Farm Land laws which were withdrawn after more than a year of agitation by farmers. Government learns sooner will be better.

It is apart of the process..changes occur like this.There should be no deferrment at all

AND MAXIMUM NO OF UNDERTRAILS ARE INNOCENT BUT FLOODED WITH JAILS ON ACCOUNT OF TAXSPAYERS MONEY AFTER ALL MOST CORRUPTED DEPARTMENT IS IN INDIA IS- POLICE DEPARTMENT AND JAIL DEPARTMENT BUT NO ARRESTING IN TWO DEPARTMENT'S MEN/ WOMEN'S

Accused were not consulted!!! Indeed.

Some of the judges say will follow old laws

A good lawyer is one who can package b.s. in convincing words for uncritical listeners. Indira Jaisingh is indeed a good lawyer.

Justice system should be equal to all irrespective of Gender, race, caste, religion. If not, then there is serious concern when people can falsely frame anyone to their benefits... Think

Madam new law will take care on passing time but new law certaint reduce futrure litigation

Is he is capable to understand that letter?

If Laws were so good mam why was their so much pendency of cases mam

No citations could be provided under new laws

What is validity of new laws

Agree with Indira Jaising. ❤

So what. This will happen even after one year. First off all why there was or is pending cases. Judiciary is responsible not d govt. Secondly a criminal has no choice to choose old or new law.I was stunned when SC justice said bail is a norm and jail is exception. What sort of message ur sending to society.

By that logic, there can be no changes in the totally idiotic legal systems can never be changed. These woman is interestedin keeping India in the dark ages.

@rajashashankgutta4334

Ай бұрын

Change for the better not worst.

@AveragepoliticsEnjoyer

Ай бұрын

​@@rajashashankgutta4334Here it's for worst

Wah bhai wah criminal ko crime karne se pehle criminal section pata hona chaiye

I agree with you mam

Cases run for 30 to 40 years no judgement only dates and fees for lawyers your discussion is not for common man but for accused. Liberty for the accused is the priority not the victim. The more comfortable a criminal is with law the more liberal the country. Who is comfortable with courts the criminal or victim just find out .

When does one consult an accused. Stupid idea. When does a plliceman asks an accused. Kya choice hai aap ka ji. Phansi chahate ho ya holiday..

@anirbanroy5102

Ай бұрын

There is difference between accused and guilty... What if tomorrow a rich person frame you and give you less chance of proving your innocence ...

What is law against Police misuse of power for extortion?

This is time for retirement of all senior lawyers as criminal lawyer

So every law should be revisited by new parliament. A pretty dangerous idea.

@taxsensemumbai9445

Ай бұрын

Unless it affects you, you are ok with it. I hope it affects you quickly. And I hope u r ok with it then

Law which will be effective from 1St JULY BNSS needs change of name at present BNSS is known as bhartiya nagarik suraksha according to 4th FRONT it should be भारतीय न्याय/न्यायिक सुविधा/संरचना सहिता 4th FRONT belives futuristic approch and humanity Laws

According to this woman the penal code in India can not be changed till eternity. She has, as her sort of other lawyers like Sibal, Singhvi or Bhushan etc., only negative approach to any thing specially coming out of the BJP govt. They are grown up with negativity that for them the glas is half empty instead of half full.

Madam, There is no problem in running British laws for over 70 years! if your logic is right, the Lakhs of pending cases in the system will take another 30 years or so and we will never implement any new law!

People of the country must be well consulted before implementing new criminal laws

@raravamudan4002

Ай бұрын

Cases run for 30 to 40 years no judgement only dates and fees for lawyers your discussion is not for common man but for accused. Liberty for the accused is the priority not the victim. The more comfortable a criminal is with law the more liberal the country. Who is comfortable with courts the criminal or victim just find out .

Why so late?????

She is just trying to put a brake on the system

What way it harms to the advocates ,it is all nonsense ,whenever you do anything some pundits immediately came up howling ,

She wants law made by previous lok Sabha revisited but is extremely comfortable with colonial laws made a 100 years ago. An excellent specimen of Macaulyism.

@rajashashankgutta4334

Ай бұрын

Just because I oppose new system doesn't mean i support old one.

Horrible recording in speed

So how can we wait indefinitely till the old cases are settled? Why don't you demand for settlement of pending cases?

Actually innocent ll get relief she is so worryied of accuse nd crimnals.

These type of lawyers are responsible for the current state of justice system in India. People of india are in favour of the new laws and government must implement it without delay as it's long due.

@AEdward-ve4wt

Ай бұрын

The criminal laws are only to protect their rapists and criminals and to force it on innocent people. Get well soon.

Madam should see things in a positive way. Should not support destructive forces.

@AEdward-ve4wt

Ай бұрын

The criminal laws are to protect their rapists and criminals.

Don’t heed to Urban Naxalites.

@theultimateshield5133

Ай бұрын

Matlab koi logical reasoning karega against any policy of the government to urban naxal sidha.

Indira jaisingh mother of domestic voilance act 2005. Horrible. In this act indian courts are with full this act. Congratulation IS..

😂 India today talking about law

She is in payroll on CIA and sorus

The new law may be rejected by some so-called experts, but the truth is that India needs to introduce new laws and not rely on old British laws.

@taxsensemumbai9445

Ай бұрын

Unless it affects you, you are ok with it. I hope it affects you quickly. And after it affect you I hope u r ok with it and you continue singing same song in jail

She is opposing it just for the heck of it... It old laws have been repackaged with improvements, she has to get educated in it and apply her mind... She is talking trash...

@Anonymous-nt4sz

Ай бұрын

She is way better than the ones we have.

The lawyers & judges must adapt to new technologies... things have to change in right direction

Banana republic 😤

This sold out NGO agent has ruined our legal process. What is her locus standi in the present context?

Kai log ki dukaan band ho jayegi

Sorry these laws were passed by Modi and his gang.

These are obstacles, they will always cry,these are against any reforms,

Even old age doesn't reform such hard headed people

जय राजपुताना जय महाराणा क्षात्र धर्म

By her logic, no law should ever be changed.

@alvonnashortt170

Ай бұрын

She is trying to save your a s s from being torn in prison. How will it reach your Gomutra drinking head

Unko abhi keisa yaad aya,

She is a good pimp having been in oldest business

lawers are vary

Most ministries are headed by MOST USELESS people…Education, Health, Finance, etc. what qualifications does Law Minister have?

The laws passed by previous government of Modi ji were not in the interest of common people of this country instead of New criminal law they could have increase numbers of judges in High court and supreme court as well in lower courts to lessen the pending cases but they are less interested in people's to get justice as early as possible

Tuely it should not be enforced as it is draconian law

Article 21 is the guiding principle of this Nation even though the police never obey or enforce or follow that .

She is right . There is going to be more chaos . India definitely needs Educated leaders .