⭐ Get the Kefine Delci Here ------- hifigo.com/products/kefine-delci/?rfsn=3737349.d530b5 ⭐ or Get them Here --------------------www.linsoul.com/products/kefine-delci/?sca_ref=234264.UaQArZ72na ⭐ or Get them Here ------------------- amzn.to/4cbJjtY

Great review! Thanks!! Yes, these are an amazing value and sound fantastic as well. Will be waiting for your next single DD colab!

I bought these when they came out. Amazing quality and value! Also the best IEMs for FPS games I’ve tried under $1100.

@whydoineedname4932

Ай бұрын

1100 or 100......

I received a pair of the Delci a couple of days ago. They are currently being broken-in, but already the sound signature is AMAZING! I am DEFINITELY keeping these fine earphones!❤

@ReverendDr.Thomas

Ай бұрын

I ADORE my Kefine Delci! 💯

Can’t wait to try these IEMs out!

Still a stud sir. Always gonna love everything you do here. Thank you!

Kefine delci or aria 2?

I have a pair! Very relaxing to listen too

2nd! Z found another banger. Tight! CommiAudio.

Have you created a reference map of the speakers and cans on the shelves? We want to know!

In terms of bass quality and punchy which is better, delci or truthhear zero?

I get these same thoughts about expensive gear every time I listen to the tangzu wan"ers. I paid $14 for them on aliexpress and I have many iems that cost 10 times that or more. The wan"ers are a perfectly tuned iem for me and I'm so happy every time I use them. Alas I keep chasing the dragon. Funny enough the Delcis are on the way to me and may arrive today.

Those are Dark Phoenix, a collab with Elise Audio.. Tuning is supposed to be a lil different from regular Phoenixcalls..

@in-earfetish

Ай бұрын

Thank you so much. FFF. I was losing my mind

@ravirajpawar7734

Ай бұрын

@@in-earfetish 🤣

Supermix 4 wen

Hello, I'm trying to remember the name of the hand made Over Ear Headphones (cans) you reviewed a year or so ago. They're about £1500 and incredible. Small maker, he was going to discontinue them and replace them with something else. Can you remember the name? Thanks.

@in-earfetish

Ай бұрын

Modhouse Tungsten. I have a review of the Double-Sided edition coming shortly on the main channel.

moondrope may 65

delci vs artti t10 at the same price ?

@profound369

Ай бұрын

I went with delci people said the artti was hard to push

@skustaclee8899

8 күн бұрын

nahhhh Planar timbre is not organic sounding

Supermix 4 soon?

Elise Audio X Kinera Dark Phoenix

Hi guys, just wanted to ask. I recently ordered Tanchjim Origins, they still haven’t arrived and I realised here in the uk it’s way easier and cheaper to buy the Dunu Falcon ultra. Have I made a mistake? How do they compare? Any help will be graciously appreciated!

@user-L3K9R6A2B7Z

Ай бұрын

Just buy either both are quite the same you'll not miss one or the other. what matters is the package if you're happy with the fit and all boom. Best iems

@kacpernowacki4654

Ай бұрын

@@user-L3K9R6A2B7Z hmm the tanjim origins just cost considerably more plus they are being posted from china so it will take ages. The dunu falcon ultra are cheaper and could arrive within days. I’ve heard that the origins are better but I’m just curious by how much.

4:30 Tin T3 Plus !?

Zeos dipping his toes into political satire... Nicely done

183 in Canada,wtf.

@in-earfetish

18 күн бұрын

That Canada Tax sucks

Are you also quitting to be an audiophile reviewer?😅

@in-earfetish

Ай бұрын

... kek

Shame no 4.4 option, it's 2024

@ronniethornton8548

20 күн бұрын

4.4 is a must for these

@jamesberryman9893

2 күн бұрын

The Kefine Delci AE just dropped for 69 and you can choose between 3.5 or 4.4

Don’t talk shit about the communist. Right now they are making the best iems in the world

@TechAudioTalks

Ай бұрын

Even they hate the CCP

@SpiritualPsychotherapyServices

Ай бұрын

Fabian, are you a SOCIALIST? 🤔

@SpiritualPsychotherapyServices

Ай бұрын

🐟 22. ILLEGITIMATE GOVERNANCES: SOCIALISM (and its more extreme form, communism) is intrinsically evil, because it is based on the ideology of social and economic egalitarianism, which is both a theoretical and a practical impossibility. Equality exists solely in abstract concepts such as mathematics and arguably in the sub-atomic realm. Many proponents of socialism argue that it is purely an economic system and therefore independent of any particular form of governance. However, it is inconceivable that socialism/communism could be implemented on a nationwide scale without any form of government intervention. If a relatively small number of persons wish to unite in order to form a commune or worker-cooperative, that is their prerogative, but it could never work in a country with a large population, because there will always exist entrepreneurs desirous of engaging in wealth-building enterprises. Even a musician who composes a hit tune wants his song to succeed and earn him inordinate wealth. Socialism reduces individual citizens to utilities, who, in practice, are used to support the ruling elite, who are invariably despotic scoundrels, and very far from ideal leaders (i.e. compassionate and righteous monarchs). Those citizens who display talent in business or the arts are either oppressed, or their gifts are coercively utilized by the corrupt state. Despite purporting to be a fair and equitable system of wealth distribution, those in leadership positions seem to live a far more luxurious lifestyle than the mass of menial workers. Wealth is effectively stolen from the rich. Most destructively, virtuous and holy teachings (“dharma”, in Sanskrit) are repressed by the irreligious and ILLEGITIMATE “government”. The argument that some form of government WELFARE programme is essential to aid those who are unable to financially-support themselves for reasons beyond their control, is fallacious. A righteous ruler (i.e. a saintly monarch) will ensure the welfare of each and every citizen by encouraging private welfare. There is no need for a king to extort money from his subjects in order to feed and clothe the impoverished. Of course, in the highly-unlikely event that civilians are unwilling to help a person in dire straits, the king would step-in to assist that person, as one would expect from a patriarch (father of his people). The head of any nation ought to be the penultimate patriarch, not a selfish buffoon. DEMOCRACY is almost as evil, because, just as the rabble favoured the murderous Barabbas over the good King Jesus, the ignorant masses will overwhelmingly vote for the candidate which promises to fulfil their inane desires, rather than one which will enforce the law, and promote a wholesome and just society. Read Chapter 12 for the most authoritative and concise exegesis of law, morality, and ethics, currently available. Even in the miraculous scenario where the vast majority of the population are holy and righteous citizens, it is still immoral for them to vote for a seemingly-righteous leader. This is because that leader will not be, by definition, a king. As clearly and logically explicated in the previous chapter of this Holy Scripture, MONARCHY is the only lawful form of governance. If an elected ruler is truly righteous, he will not be able to condone the fact that the citizens are paying him to perform a job (which is a working-class role), and that an inordinate amount of time, money and resources are being wasted on political campaigning. Furthermore, an actual ruler does not wimpishly pander to voters - he takes power by (divinely-mandated) force, as one would expect from the penultimate alpha-male in society (the ultimate alpha-male being a priest). The thought of children voting for who will be their parents or teachers, would seem utterly RIDICULOUS to the average person, yet most believe that they are qualified to choose their own ruler - they are most assuredly not. Just as a typical child fails to understand that a piece of sweet, juicy, healthy, delicious fruit is more beneficial for them than a cone of pus-infested, fattening, diabetes-inducing ice-cream, so too can the uneducated proletariat not understand that they are unqualified to choose their own leader, even after it is logically explained to them (as it is in this chapter, as well as in the previous chapter). And by “uneducated”, it is simply meant that they are misguided in the realities of life and in righteous living (“dharma”, in Sanskrit), not in facts and figures or in technical training. Intelligence doesn't necessarily correlate to wisdom. No socialist or democratic government will educate its citizens sufficiently well that the citizens have the knowledge of how to usurp their rule. To put it frankly, democracy is rule by the “lowest common denominator”. It should be obvious that ANARCHY can never ever succeed, because even the smallest possible social unit (the nuclear family) requires a dominator. Any family will fall-apart without a strict male household head. In fact, without the husband/father, there is no family, by definition. The English noun “husband” comes from the Old Norse word “hûsbôndi”, meaning “master of the house”. The same paradigm applies to the extended family, which depends on a strong patriarchal figure (customarily, the eldest or most senior male). Likewise with clans, tribes, villages, towns, cities, and nations or countries. Unfortunately, there are many otherwise-intelligent persons who honestly believe that an ENTIRE country can smoothly run without a leader in place. Any sane person can easily understand that even a nuclear family is unable to function properly without a head of the house, what to speak of a populous nation. The reason for anarchists' distrust of any kind of government is due to the corrupt nature of democratic governments, and the adulteration of the monarchy in recent centuries. However, if anarchists were to understand that most all so-called “kings/queens” in recent centuries were not even close to being true monarchs, they may change their stance on that inane “system”. Most of the problems in human society are directly or indirectly attributable to this relatively modern phenomenon (non-monarchies), since it is the government’s role and sacred DUTY to enforce the law (see Chapter 12), and non-monarchical governments are themselves unlawful. One of the many sinister characteristics of democracy, socialism, and other evil forms of governance, is the desire for their so-called “leaders” to control, or at least influence, the private lives of every single citizen (hence the term “Nanny State”). For example, in the wicked, decadent nations in which this holy scripture was composed, The Philippine Islands and The Southland (or “Australia”, as it is known in the Latin tongue), the DEMONIC governments try, and largely succeed, in controlling the rights of parents to properly raise, discipline and punish their children according to their own morals, compulsory vaccination of infants, enforcing feminist ideology, limiting legitimate powers an employer has over his servants, subsidizing animal agriculture, persecuting religious leaders (even to imprisonment and death, believe it or not. Personally, I have been jailed thrice for executing God’s perfect and pure will), and even trying to negatively influence what people eat and wear. Not that a government shouldn’t control what its citizens wear in public, but it should ensure that they are MODESTLY dressed, according to the guidelines outlined in Chapter 28, which is hardly the case in Australia, the Philippines, and similar nations. At least ninety-nine per cent of Filipinas, for instance, are transvestinal, despite Philippines pretending to be a religious nation. Cont...