What I like about Quanta is it's a regular reminder of just what crazy and marvelous things humans out there are doing and pondering.

@mewoneightballs7261

9 ай бұрын

It gives me hope.

I really like Dr. Kalai's positive charisma, you can see immediately how motivated she is to talk about the subject.

@yanntal954

9 ай бұрын

Lots and lots of caffeine

@jaysmith3361

9 ай бұрын

subject? what subject? post quantum secure? digital has never been secure.

@yabannamba7678

9 ай бұрын

simp

@YouilAushana

9 ай бұрын

Israeli?

@petercreed2471

8 ай бұрын

She seems cracked out😂 or like she smoked just a tad bit too much meth. Lol she's so overly excited

Her enthusiasm about what she is doing is amazing

@bluesque9687

9 ай бұрын

Yea, why is she is so excited about it?

@ladnir

9 ай бұрын

Cryptography is fun ;)

@TheGajuh

9 ай бұрын

@@bluesque9687 I think if someone is genuinely interested in what one's doing, it is exciting and that shows up when communicating

@ArawnOfAnnwn

9 ай бұрын

@@bluesque9687 Math nerds are always excited about new math problems. :)

@bluesque9687

9 ай бұрын

@@ArawnOfAnnwn if it hadn't been for math nerds, I would've liked math more!

This is fantastic, it really does encourage you to dig deeper, love it. Thank you 🙏

It would be awesome to listen to her get more technical

@AP-dc1ks

9 ай бұрын

The papers are online probably

Today is a beautiful day!!! Wishing everyone happiness, love and joy!!! And thanks for the video))))👏

Cryptography has evovled in past along with our computational power, I am certain that it will do the same again when the time comes.

Read the written interview on Quanta's website: www.quantamagazine.org/the-cryptographer-who-ensures-we-can-trust-our-computers-20230727/ Explore more of our computer science coverage: www.quantamagazine.org/computer-science/

Awesome! Go Yael :)

Great video.

5:19 Is the giant book on the table Cormen? It looks like Intro to algorithms!

@bzaban

9 ай бұрын

It is Cormen`s book! The bible, the definitive reference! =)

@yanntal954

9 ай бұрын

Interesting! I can't really tell if it's brown (fourth edition) but it seems like it?

Your face reminds me of Danielle Rousseau from "LOST"!

She talks in such an elegant way, a sign of a truly educated person! 💙

1:03 a key takeaway about cryptography? well played, Yael!

Cool

One of the most beautiful computer scientist researcher in the world

I think FHE, MPC, Lattice Base are important cryptosystems in the future

@saik6730

3 ай бұрын

Symmetric Encryption is proving to be best solution to protect cyber attacks from quantum compute

Show me someone who’s worried about quantum computers ‘breaking the internet’ and I’ll show you someone who doesn’t understand cryptography. (See: ‘CRYSTALS-Kyber’, etc)

@BraedenSmith

9 ай бұрын

I don't think the concern is that we'll be unable to develop post-quantum cryptographic algorithms. But the concern is having the ability to break the security of crypto that's used right now, in the future. We don't have forward secrecy guarantees & we could have TLS sessions recorded and broken many many years in the future.

@dhess34

9 ай бұрын

@@BraedenSmith True: historical data, such as that gathered by nation states, will almost certainly be decrypted in the future. But day-to-day functions like e-commerce and messaging will have moved quantum-resistant (we think) algorithms before someone assemble| a machine with enough qbits to crack, say AES 256. Speaking of preserving data for future examination, the NSA’s Utah facility is beloved to have yottabyte-scale storage, i.e. 8,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000+ bits!

She is the literal female counterpart of Joe Grand! 😮

is she somehow related to Gil Kalai?

Succinct Non-interactive Argument (SNARG). I imagine Prof. Kalai has researched, and lectured on, quantum cryptography.

I read a book on cryptography from MIT recently and oh my god the book actually taught me stuff..😂 I actually understood this

@captspeedy1899

9 ай бұрын

which book?

Every one is a gangster until powerful quantum computer arrives crushing every possible encryption.

@imapimplykindapimp

9 ай бұрын

Not every possible, just all the major ones used today :p

@unflexian

9 ай бұрын

post-quantum encryption is already here

@CheckmateSurvivor

5 ай бұрын

Talking about puzzles, the puzzle in my latest video is practically impossible to solve.

@flyingbluelion

4 ай бұрын

double the key size

1:33 ^ ε ^

Very active woman. That's my type 😚 Way to go, girl!!

Shalom Ms. Kalai. Thank you for your presentation and introduction to cryptography here to us. I used to code in assembler, and I'm getting more educated in quantum phenomena & computing. I'd be interested to hear your theories about quantum security and entanglement. Thank you 🙏 I'm always appreciative of a brilliant, beautiful woman such as yourself. 😅😊 🏥👨‍⚕️

If it’s not quantum it’s eventually hackable

This is a great Cryptography 101 video, thanks!

So to make this concrete, Ethereum and SNARG. That's something to look up.

Thanks, nice, but why are you so excited about what?!

That's why German soldiers in 1940ie use enigma machine to send super secret messages to soldiers on battlefield

Just at 1:00, but we humans are so inefficient (with people randomly working here and there on stuff.), so considering this too, apart from the ofcourse and obvious our limited memory ie ram and rom and intelligence (especially, having to click things,) the scientific and technological and medical super/ultra exponential growth that we are going to see after ai is inevitable and irrefutable.

First hehe

This explanation was so vague and just stems of futuristic mumble jambo. She didn't explain how you can provide a certificate that the computation is correct. How do you know it is correct if you haven't evaluated it yet? If you can evaluate it and compare with the cloud computer result, why even use it in the first place? If you're talking about computations which can be checked easily but are not computable easily, isn't it easier to just give it to the weak device and let it figure out wheter it is right or wrong without cryptography? This just doesn't make sense, and the mention of cryptocurrency just enforces to me that this is a solution looking for a problem.

@RegrinderAlert

9 ай бұрын

You are missing the whole idea. It’s not just about validating a result. It’s about validating the computation itself. Of course, a valid computation implies a valid result.

@jamesphillips2285

9 ай бұрын

The Great (Internet) Mersenne Prime Search uses such proofs to avoid completely redoing long-running computations. Previously the strategy was to have 2 computers run the Lucas-Lehmer primality test: using a 3rd or even 4th computer as tie-breakers if there was a disagreement. The problem is that even with no monetary reward: some people cheat the system (or their computers may not be reliable). So now the strategy is to run a Probable Prime test in parallel with a compact certificate of the computation. A central server then modifies the certificate in a traceable way and hands out the certificate for verification. The server is needed to prevent people from cheating on the much shorter verification computation. It a number comes back "probably prime" a full LL test is still needed. But the switch over to PRP tests + certificates promises to halve the computation needed for the project.

@AP-dc1ks

9 ай бұрын

just read the papers

@diegoaugusto1561

9 ай бұрын

​@@RegrinderAlertHow do you validate the computation if your device isn't capable of doing it itself? In some cases, validating the result is easier than computing it (sudoku, sort algorithm, etc) and I can understand that. Which is why I ask: why involve cryptography in this matter? This again reinforces to me that this is about the Blockchain, not a real problem. Some examples of which kind of computation works in the manner described would be helpful. I just can't imagine why this would be useful outside of Blockchain technologies.

@RegrinderAlert

9 ай бұрын

@@diegoaugusto1561 A fun read is “Verifying computations without reexecuting them” by Walfish, Blumberg (2015). This is not about “the blockchain” in the slightest. But I am still dazzled how people tend to dismiss the incredibly useful applications of said technology just because of cryptocurrency, NFT and buzzword wars in situations where it’s not an improvement over existing solutions.

Tech giant companies like Google have lots of information about us and the main thing here is that we ourselves not know how and where they use it eventhough it's our ...😂😢

What is secure 🔐 Actually humen beings are secure Without any electronic devices , without phone 📱, computer,bug blaa blaa . So send your message by Mai to kept it sefe

@theneuralmancer

9 ай бұрын

That's not entirely accurate. Look up things like Caesar cipher and old cipher methods which were invented way before computers and were used to secure messages

@Dheeraj5373

9 ай бұрын

@@theneuralmancer yeah, but you know humans are humans, and computers are computers 🖥️. Actually, computers are not unsafe, but that person is a threat 😔 as they use it to exploit common people, taking their private photos and selling them to third parties. So, yeah, human beings talking without any electronic devices are quite safe, actually, much safer.

@MurseSamson

9 ай бұрын

Where there is motivation to uncover the motives of other people, there will be efforts to reveal that which cannot be seen. Mail services to authoritarians have been compromisable for > 900 years. 📨 The real answer is that there is no security, unless no one is looking.

@axioms22

9 ай бұрын

Kumar bro you gotta chill with the comments, 4 different comments? Also its human not humen lol

@CrittingOut

9 ай бұрын

moronic

she works for microsoft. she should be solving windows 0 days instead of making videos. 😂 I can't trust any microsoft computer at all.

@krissp8712

9 ай бұрын

That's like saying because she works at MIT she should be training mechanical engineers only, and not doing anything else! You need various different types to make an organisation work.

@CrittingOut

9 ай бұрын

not really related fields but yes microsoft is not very secure

Most of the people in the industry are more interested in SNARKs (succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge ) - for those looking into this you might find more interesting and useful information by searching SNARK instead of SNARG