Immanuel KANT: Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals

Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (German: Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten; 1785; also known as the Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals and the Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals) is the first of Immanuel Kant's mature works on moral philosophy and remains one of the most influential in the field. Kant conceives his investigation as a work of foundational ethics-one that clears the ground for future research by explaining the core concepts and principles of moral theory and showing that they are normative for rational agents. Kant aspires to nothing less than this: to lay bare the fundamental principle of morality and show that it applies to us. In the text, Kant provides a groundbreaking argument that the rightness of an action is determined by the character of the principle that a person chooses to act upon. Kant thus stands in stark contrast to the moral sense theories and teleological moral theories that dominated moral philosophy at the time he was writing. Central to the work is the role of what Kant refers to as the categorical imperative, the concept that one must act only according to that precept which he or she would will to become a universal law.
The Groundwork is broken into a preface, followed by three sections (1: Transition from the common rational knowledge of morality to the philosophical; 2: Transition from popular moral philosophy to the metaphysic of morals; 3: Final step from the metaphysic of morals to the critique of the pure practical reason). Kant's argument works from common reason up to the supreme unconditional law, in order to identify its existence. He then works backwards from there to prove the relevance and weight of the moral law. The third and final section of the book is famously obscure, and it is partly because of this that Kant later, in 1788, decided to publish the Critique of Practical Reason.
Summary of The Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals (also known as the Groundwork of Metaphysic of Morals) by German Philosopher, Immanuel Kant adapted from Wikipedia.

Пікірлер: 16

  • @yana_2_6_0
    @yana_2_6_04 жыл бұрын

    Listened to this while sleeping and absorbed it into my subconscious, now I’m an enlightened kantian.

  • @ankitaaarya

    @ankitaaarya

    2 жыл бұрын

    You didn't do that.

  • @melloroom7510
    @melloroom75105 жыл бұрын

    Second Section beginning 54:41 end 1:00:52

  • @kellylamoreaux3092

    @kellylamoreaux3092

    5 жыл бұрын

    Thank you

  • @EchoOfAmarok

    @EchoOfAmarok

    3 жыл бұрын

    MVP! Thank you.

  • @lizgichora6472
    @lizgichora64723 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for this audio, a beautiful revision on, Goodwill: The will has to be on categorical imperative, and is rationally free from influence. The necessity of it is in principle of it's Autonomy being free from influence and thus, conformed to rational morals of universal law. Reason and understanding .

  • @isnotkevin
    @isnotkevin5 жыл бұрын

    3rd section @ 1:30:00.

  • @odiehl82
    @odiehl825 жыл бұрын

    Section 1 18:30

  • @tuffkookey6108
    @tuffkookey61083 жыл бұрын

    Wonderful voice.

  • @Andrea_aale
    @Andrea_aale5 жыл бұрын

    1. 18:36

  • @Angelicaarchangelica
    @Angelicaarchangelica2 жыл бұрын

    That is interesting, I have studied Kant since my early teenage years, and generally, I am known to understand it very well. However, I am starting to question the practical benefit of concepts such as cosmopolitanism. Moreover, I find nature to present more examples of moral behaviour than the moral law considered applicable by man/woman nowadays.

  • @churasannoo
    @churasannoo4 жыл бұрын

    does anyone know which translation/edition this is

  • @ihoppea1806

    @ihoppea1806

    4 жыл бұрын

    I think it's by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott

  • @Angelicaarchangelica
    @Angelicaarchangelica2 жыл бұрын

    A cosmopolitan world would somewhat nullify the freedom to be oneself and act in accordance to one's conscious, and one political system or religious orientation being applied globally would unavoidably breach the categorical imperative because it would violate the rights of the ones whose political system and religion is irradiated, therefore, not universally applicable.

  • @Angelicaarchangelica
    @Angelicaarchangelica2 жыл бұрын

    Cosmopolitanism is speculative reasonable but practically problematic.