IJN Fuso, 1944 - Ship Review [War Thunder]
Ойындар
The meta has changed and we have to have a fresh look at it and what a better start than a good old ship review on the beautiful IJN Fuso, 1944.
Lik to Drachinifel's 5 min guide:
• IJN Fuso - Guide 013 (...
If you want to send me a WT replay for featuring you, pls also add screenshots of the post battle results, if your vehicle is not fully upgraded, also a screenshot of the module and also a description of the battle with timestamps of important decision makings or actions.
Send this package to:
Napalmratte@gmx.de
Join my Discord today and become part of the community:
/ discord
Link for contacting E.T.Blue (blueflames):
www.etsy.com/uk/shop/Blueper
/ blueperdesigns
/ e.t.blue
Link to AirModels where I get 20 %:
airmodels.net/?aff=84
Link to Syphon Signal´s KZread channel (Channel branding):
/ @siphonsignal6965
Link to TeknoAXE´s Royalty Free Music KZread channel (Outro music):
/ @teknoaxe
Want to play War Thunder with a little golden starter help?
Play for free: warthunder.com/en/registration...
Follow me on Twitter: / napalmratte
Пікірлер: 87
Nice video layout! For the few of us naval players out there, these videos are very helpful!
A short history of the ship and a deep dive into spreadsheets, this is definitely an improvement.
@Napalmratte
Жыл бұрын
I used to do this often in the past and views still dropped ...
@Nico_Sama
Жыл бұрын
@@Napalmratte I suppose if this issue had a clear solution then it wouldn't be such a heated topic among youtubers.
Hi Napalm, this is a really good breakdown! Loved the history info from Drachifinel and the detailed comparison vs it's competitors. More of this style would be awesome and really helpful! :)
The 6" secondaries are knocked out by overpressure, not because of the fragments that penetrate. An Akizuki's 100 mm guns can decimate the secondaries. You also didn't notice that the barbettes have two layers of armour. Shell rooms are not "magazines". They are shell rooms. Magazines are the propellant charges. Hyuuga never had Type 0 HE. The ordinary SAP was considered HE when Hyuuga initially was added to the game, but then they changed it into SAP.
@Joze1090
Жыл бұрын
Lol is it your job to correct (sometimes painfully semantic) every little error that our friend here makes? Loosen up Lol
@nathansherman5684
Жыл бұрын
@@Joze1090 it does add to playstyle
those winning songs... how I miss they, made game more charismatic, I don't know why they deleted
Loved the video mate, great review and stats breakdown from yourself and the informative history from drachinfel. Nice gameplay, overall great format.
It's weird to see the Hyuga is being overperformance by the Fuso when it is supposed to be the improved version of it so i hope the Ise-class will be added with its modernized configurations (But not the hybrid version).
@magiaconatus
Жыл бұрын
Well, Hyuuga is nerfed on many levels by the devs. Missing armour, incorrect draft, and the whole ship leans towards the stern, making the vulnerable magazines easier to hit.
@ThatZenoGuy
Жыл бұрын
Hyuga is in a WW1 refit, of course the refitted Fuso is superior.
@i_nameless_i-jgsdf
Жыл бұрын
@@ThatZenoGuy Well, i knew about that. That is why i said that the Ise should be added in the form of modernized variant like the Fuso because she is the lead ship to the Hyuga.
@ThatZenoGuy
Жыл бұрын
@@i_nameless_i-jgsdf Agreed.
Loved the video napalm. I really appreciate all the info, and having the 5 min guide is a very interesting addition. Thanks
Thanks for this Guide. I'm on my way to Fuso but the Sturmtiger grind delayed it. I was seeing the Fuso as an Hyuga with WW2 AAs but I guess the difference are more subtile. Now for my toptier Naval line-up I'm hesitating between pairing Fuso with Kongo for caping or pairing Fuso with Hyuga for absolute damage dealing. Got other crew slots but reserved for Mogami (talisman)/ Tone, Shimakaze/ Akizuki, the PT-15, the B7A2 torpedo bomber and finally the float plane Zero for cap clutch. Listin everything made me realise Japan has probably the most polyvalent line-up in Naval.
Such a great dive into history, while showing entertaining gameplay. Subscribed. : )
Hey man I saw ur video for the tusk and about your situation I just want to say we the constant watchers really like and enjoy and videos and we support you! Don’t stress urself out cause the vids are getting low views,all bad things pass and ur videos are great 👍
Love the ship reviews
@Napalmratte
Жыл бұрын
My pleasure
I definitely felt the 356mm Japanese SAP nerf because I no longer clap Helenas with their magical “anti-fragmentation armor”. In fact, the SAP feels so bad now that even direct hits into shell rooms (not magazines) dont even detonate half the time. Now I just switch to the APCBC, which still feels like hit or miss (depending on the armor thickness of target).
Fear the pagoda tower
Another great review!
Can’t wait to get her sick vid
Heey, I finally got your video on my main feed. I watched like 20 of them in short sequence, perhaps that's why.
@Napalmratte
Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
Thanks for the video! How did you configured that background, please, and how did you were able to change the looking perspective! Thanks a lot!
Put this on my max naval crew, going to grind out modifications after the anniversary (since Fuso mods aren’t reduced cost for now).
It’s an older ship class sir but it checks out.
Can you revisit the pariskaya komuna and explain way is it the most expensive battelships with the worst sl and rp gains?
Hi guys just a quick naval question. Bought the pg 02. Very happy with it but I read on the wiki that it has an aa radar. I can not activate it. Has it been removed?
Hey do you suggest me to put a talisman on hyuga or Kongo? Of yes which One for you Is Better?
*P A G O D A P O W E R*
Love how her scout plane catapult is completely non-functional just like Aoba for no clear reason.
@ousou78
Жыл бұрын
Well the most outrageous ship without it's plane is the Tone. She is litterally an "aviation cruiser" but can't launch a single plane.
@ZeroZeroSection
Жыл бұрын
@@ousou78 Tone's supposed excuse is that since her deck floatplane facilities were removed in her AA refit, she doesn't get them (even though her catapults are completely intact). But since that excuse doesn't work for Aoba or Fuso I'd imagine it's just laziness on Gaijin's behalf and they're never going to change it.
Why does the HE have HALF of the TNT yield of the SAP?
@Perfectly_Other
Жыл бұрын
Not sure what era of ammunition warthunder has based the shell data from but best I can tell from a general Google search the wwII era HE shell was designed as a anti air ordinance with a timed fuse in which case they wouldn't need such a large charge (they also had an incendiary shrapnel shell for AA use) It could also potentially be to do with how warthunder calculates damage. so in order to accurately emulate the post penetration damage of a sap shell they artificially increased its TNT equivalent to get the desired damage. I am just theorising on as I don't know the intricacies of how warthunder calculates the damage a hut does but I think it's plausible e ough to mention
@V-V1875-h
Жыл бұрын
@@Perfectly_Other that HE isn't time fuzed, and neither is it the Type 3 shell
@V-V1875-h
Жыл бұрын
@@Perfectly_Other probablz right with the WT just being wierd with the HE fillers
@magiaconatus
Жыл бұрын
@@Perfectly_Other Amazing. You got nothing right.
@magiaconatus
Жыл бұрын
Because they are two different eras. The SAP is from the 1910's and the HE is from the late 1930's. Fragmentation in the 1910's was understood very well and by WW2, Navies around the world realised that too much filler created very small fragments that lost penetration fast. WT doesn't take into account the C/M (charge-to-mass) ratio for calculating fragmentation penetration. It is quite primitive in the sense that more TNTe = more pen.
Is in game height of gunnery camera relative to height of the fire controls in the mast?
@Napalmratte
Жыл бұрын
Sadly no
@M65V19
Жыл бұрын
@@Napalmratte That really sad. I want to see over horizon sitting on pagoda mast!
The secondaries are in case-mates. not case-ments. I concede however, that your confusion is valid.
Want to see WW1 Bluecher
I wo der why Fusou was added in her retrofit form while Hyuga not
i have a 1000 GE laying back from the discount bonanza, would a Yubari for 875 be a good investment? because i would love to unlock japanese ships, in preparation for Yamato cometh.
@Napalmratte
Жыл бұрын
Yubari is not that great of a grinder IMO
@ousou78
Жыл бұрын
Absolutly not. Got the Yubari from the warbon shop. Despite not paying I regret getting it. You would be better putting a talisman on a regular tech tree ship. Kako is fun with 8 inch at low tier or Akizuki is fun against other DDs.
@Dondolini94
Жыл бұрын
@@ousou78 thanks both for the useful insight!
@ousou78
Жыл бұрын
@@Dondolini94 you are welcome
napalm there is massive RP nerf for naval for example the USS northhampton from 208% to 160%. It's very painful to grind.
@Napalmratte
Жыл бұрын
Always has been
People can see fuso tower mast and shoot people over the wall
which battleship u love the most ?
@Napalmratte
Жыл бұрын
Von der Tann despite it not being the best
anigilation ship, de moines hunter destroyer
扶桑(fuso)
Nice Ship but when will the Yamato or Musashi come???
@Napalmratte
Жыл бұрын
When Gaijin Sees the right time to earn the max profit with their introduction. What did you think?
@robertroccii7117
Жыл бұрын
@@Napalmratte I think at Xmas would be the right time. I want the Yamato. I am driving an Mazda CX-30 with Enkei "Yamato" Alluminium wheels. I need in the Game also the Yamato or the Bismarck!!! One of them or the Musashi!!!!
@ousou78
Жыл бұрын
@@robertroccii7117 It's way too early for the Yamatos. First there are many 15 then 16 inch battleships that must be added to the game. Then we could expect to see the Yamato. Seeing the rate of the updates for ships, I would be surprised if Yamato or Musashi are anded in less than 2 years from now.
@robertroccii7117
Жыл бұрын
@@ousou78 You´re right. It´s too early for the most powerful Battleships the world has ever seen. But 2 Years is a long time. Gaijin should make more speed in the Naval forces. I love to get my Sverdlov and kill the Battlecruisers or Battleships if they are not too much in a Game.
@nicolasisquithcarreno9692
Жыл бұрын
They’ll probably add Nagato or Mutsu first
Why Japanese ships have skyscrapers as combat bridge??? I mean it looks dope af. But why?
@Napalmratte
9 ай бұрын
To get all the modern rangefinders and Commando structures etc in an older ship hull
Kongo is better or fuso?
@Napalmratte
Жыл бұрын
Depends. Fuso obviously in firepower
The fuso is incredibly tanky and is superior to all the Japanese BBs by wide margins. It doesn't have the 1 shot weakness of the hyuga and does not have the HE weakness like the Kongo and Haruna. It's AA battery is sufficient and is spaced in such a way that HE spam doesn't wipe 40% in one salvo. However I have noticed my magazines getting detonated by HE from cruisers with them somehow able to slowly turn them red and blow me up
@magiaconatus
Жыл бұрын
That's just the HE bug ignoring armour plates. Happens and can happen with every other ship. Her frontal shell rooms go up in flames all the time if people aim at them, if you are lucky. Otherwise, they just ignite the magazines too.
Is the Bayern finally fixed ?
@Napalmratte
Жыл бұрын
I have to check it out
@nou1472
Жыл бұрын
@@Napalmratte I tried her yesterday was a short try tho got blown up in the first 2 mins of the battle by a light crusier
Yea good luck playing it. There is a new bug out that blows up your 98% crew battleship with HE like it got ammo racked by AP. Till it gets fixed I'm done playing Battleship. We need a complete overhaul of HE anyway. Name one ship in WW2 that died to HE fire from another ship. Go ahead I'll wait .. couldn't find any? That's because HE shot at a BB or Cruiser even wouldn't do significant damage let alone one shot it. I hear that the crew is modeled spread throughout the ship in cabins. Cabins? In combat the crew would be inside the citadel areas unless they were out on the AAA or secondary guns. He should be modeled where it does maybe 1/4 damage in total to the ship due to fire or such Max. This is because eventually the ship won't have any burnable material up top and the crew would be reduced to the point where the AAA and maybe the secondary guns are unable to fire due to crew loss.
WTF YOU'RE WAY OF TALKING IS DIFFERENT
@Napalmratte
Жыл бұрын
?