200 works on so many genres. Academics back than are something else. I think this show us level of importance given to acquisition of knowledge by islamic empire.

@samimas4343

2 жыл бұрын

That's what memorizing the Quran from an early age does to a person. The Quran has broad terminology and various topics. It's rythm is mind opening. And the grammar of it, to memorise the whole Quran with such precise grammar programs your brain with logic and methodology.

Paul, thanks for your contributions... If I can give an advice: When someone says 'salalahu 'aleyhi wa salam' (giving peace and greetings to the Prophet), u should do it to (can do it quietly). He ﷺ said: “Whoever sends blessings upon me once, Allah will send blessings upon him tenfold and will erase from him ten misdeeds and raise him ten degrees in status.” Narrated by an-Nasaa’i (1297) and in Surah al-Ahzab (33:56)..

I honestly think your channel is GOAT ... may God bless you man .. greetings from Egypt ...

@BloggingTheology

2 жыл бұрын

🙌

Ya Allah. What an awesome talk that mourns in such a beautiful way an amazing world that we have lost 😢😢😢

@786humaira1

2 жыл бұрын

It is to us and our children to make even better world . Sheikh abdul Hakeem Murad is just doing that . Training future leaders .

Ibn Sina(رحمه الله)is probably one of the most influential thinkers of all time , and he's my favorite philosopher رحمك الله يا أرسطو المسلمين ❤

@kalijasin

2 жыл бұрын

More influential than Prophet Isa and Muhammad (SAW)?? 😯

@haledhajdari1154

2 жыл бұрын

@@kalijasin He said THINKER.

@devilwarrior5285

2 жыл бұрын

انت شتمته لما قلت هو ارسطو المسلمين، اما تعلم ان ارسطو هذا كان وثنيا يعبد الاصنام وكان ساحرا للملك المقدوني

@absaly

2 ай бұрын

subjective thinking has its downfalls as demonstrated by sina when his lifetime of research concludes Allah isnt Absolutely aware of his own creation & what they get up to within the abyss of their minds/souls

This is gold. Thank you so much. May Allah reward you.

Another splendid interview thank you

Subhannallah. May Allah bless our ulama. Verily the soul need it nourishment, the mind also need its nourishment. This was very nourishing

I really appreciate Shaykh Karamali's point about the Bogomils. That is a great point!

This is the first video i just watched from this channel and i absolutely love it! a very unique and different content. this type of content is not normally found on youtube, it's a rare gem (low view count tells me that algorithm doesnt promote it). i learned a lot from this. thank you very much, blogging theology! one problematic issue: i checked out the website and it seems like some sort of money grab with all the psychological tricks to get you to cough up hard cash (super expensive too) if you want to learn Islamic theology. as a dawah initiative, they should've uploaded all the video lessons to youtube (free) instead of asking for money. this bugs me a lot. not good.

You're most welcomed Paul on Blogging Theology ❤️😁

Brilliant! 👌 Enjoyed this. I like the way he merged traditional and modern learning/scholarship into one, finding a middle ground. Such important topics are important and shows how much nuanced and technical we may need to be!

Masha'allah Masha'Allah My God protect you Very nice video Thank you Jazakum Allah khier

I have been fortunate enough to have visited the ancient city of Hamedan in Iran, basically to visit the ancient pre historic civilisation, city of Ecbatana. But I was pleasantly surprised, not a well promoted touristic fact by the Iranian, that Hamedan is where Ibnu Sina had died. There was a mouseleum built in his honour near the central plaza, Khomenei Plaza. He had also been elected as the Mayor of Hamedan before his death.

I love you ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ ALLAH BLESS YOU 🙏

@zakyzayn5361

2 жыл бұрын

1. 😳🙄 2. 🥰👍

All the Companions of the beloved Prophet pbuh are respectful and pious.

Salam Paul, where did you purchase ghazalis book from. Great podcast btw

Assalyam aleikum from Uzbekistan

A good unbiased view of Avicenna’s work - his difference with Ghazali have been blown out of all proportions by the orientalist to make a point that Islam is anti rationality and oppressive of reason. This is not the case - this was a theological debate.

@syedkazmi6487

2 жыл бұрын

I beg to differ on this ibn e sina and his ilk were deviants and Is from a Karamatian rafawid sect and believe in Baataniya which take you out of the fold of Islam. Pls do your research about them. They were responsible for attacks the pilgrims in Haj time and stealing black stone ripped from the corner of the Kaaba. Remember it the whole was looted and the Hajr was recovered after many years

@doctorSuhailAnwar

2 жыл бұрын

@@syedkazmi6487 Qarmatians were Ismail Shias - under the leader ship of Janabi they performed the atrocity that you refer to . I would be interested to see your reference linking Avicenna to them - thanks

@aadamrehman4812

2 жыл бұрын

@@syedkazmi6487 no ibn sina was sunni his father was from amongst the ismailis, but he himself decided to become sunni.

@theokra

2 жыл бұрын

@@syedkazmi6487 His family was settled near Bukhara, and although his father and brother became Ismailis, this does not link any of them to the Qarmatians, who were definitely out of the fold of Islam. Please state your sources instead of spreading misinformation.

@weshouldsaveourselves6780

Жыл бұрын

some of those who use logic state that Allah doesnt know about the details of humans lives, that Allah cannot see or hear. they have derived these from their own logic. how can we say this is something from Islam? someone who has these beliefs is someone who doesnt know about Islam or they are stuborn and they reject the truth when its given to them. they reject the quran and sunnah and the understandings of the great imams.

AsSalamu alaikum, Mr Williams seeking yr permission to cut the Intolerance portion & upload to my rumble channel.

Travels of Ibni Sinha, a documentary made by an Australian journalists is worth watching.

Allah akber

The Bogumils beloved that Jesus came to reveal and not to redeem. Fascinating interview! Allah blessing be up on you!

Really interesting!

Well done. May Allah SubHaanaHu wa Taaala make your efforts prosperous upon the Straight Path Representing and Promulgating to Muslim Children and beyond , The Common Islamic Norms Teachings Practices Ideals and Morals Behaviors and Attitudes ... follows/following the Azhar Shareef model which is the highest authentic Islamic authority that continues the following of methods and paradigms and ways upheld by the previous generations that were established by the Righteous Predecessors Salaf elSaliheen upon the Kitab= Thikr and the Sunnah of AhleThikr - Beginning with the Prophet Muhammad 3lyhisSalaat.wa.Salaam followed by the four caliphs and the Prophetically-selected authorized "scholarly-references" from among the noble household and the companions and those who followed their following examples in the latter generation and so on and so forth unto the AhlusSunnah Community of Mujtahids among the Mutakallimeen Theologians (Mufawwid-Tahawi-Hanbali's and Mu2awwil-Ashaari-Maturidi) , the Fuqaha Jurists especially the four respective schools (Ahmed.bin HANBAL, Mohammed ALSHAFIEE, MALIK bin Anas, abu HANEEFA ) , the Awliyaa ( JUNAID Sufi Implementers of Hikma and Maarifa , Tazkiyya and Tasawwuf of Suluk of Tariqa and Sharee3a e.g. Imam Shaaraani ) reflecting the Islamic Sunni narratives (Azhar Shareef being the actual Islamic narrative , the balanced narrative, based upon UsulElFiqh and the Fiqh of the Sunni World ) not just pandering to the Salafist group that *prohibits* Music and *all* or any "innovation" nor to the Secularist groups that *permits* every kind of Music and *all* or any "innovation" , proudly representing the ideal Traditions in the now and the new!

Brothers, do both of you really believe that philosophy and medicine started with Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle? Each of them studied in pre and post-Greek Egypt where they studied Wisdom. Aristotle plagiarized ancient Egyptian books brought to him by Alexander. Plato admits that he learned from the Egyptian Priests for 13 years. Do your research. I could go on...

@justsaying444

2 жыл бұрын

It is not the matter of who started these sciences. It is about what is survived and expanded ,written down and influenced the humanity and that was greek philosophical ideology. They definitely have teachers , teachers outside of the greece perhaps. Everyone in those times travel to learn. But greek influence on philosophy and culture and medicine is monumental.

@EarthColonyNet

2 жыл бұрын

@@justsaying444 Medicine was far advanced before Plato. Read Herodotus about brain surgery being performed in ancient Egypt. For thousands of years, students entered into and left Egypt having learned arithmetic, geometry, and trigonometry as well as second-degree equations. Pythagoras did not figure out the famous trigonometric function, it was plagiarized. The same with Euclid's geometry. Plato's dialogues are full of Egyptian wisdom (which he admits) which was passed on to Persian and Arab philosophers. Even St. Augustine said Christianity existed before Christianity in Egypt. Plotinus learned from Ammonius Saccas an Egyptian. Greeks stood in the shadow of Ancient Egypt as does Christianity today, modifications notwithstanding. Lastly, it does matter who started the sciences because of the extreme ethnocentrism and racism prevalent today.

@merlinx8703

2 жыл бұрын

The Babylonians and Egyprians were advanced civilisations It is possible the Greeks learnt from these 2 civilisations

@786humaira1

2 жыл бұрын

@@EarthColonyNet well said Steven dear .

I believe the word "Canon" used in contemporary English comes from the Qanoon fil Tib. Qanoon ->> Canon to refer to an extensive volume/s on any subject. Qanoon I guess translates into Rules/laws/Principles. Edit: It actually comes from Greek, as Mr. Steven V aptly educated us in the comments below. Thank you once again Steven. 😊👍

@koroglurustem1722

2 жыл бұрын

Of course

@stevenv6463

2 жыл бұрын

No the Arabic قانون and English canon both come from Greek.

@TabeshKhan

2 жыл бұрын

@@stevenv6463 Any reference? I don't think so, cuz if it were philosophy then there might've been a possibility. Or had greek been a Semitic language and arabic borrowing from a sister language would've made sense. So I don't think the greek qualifies here.

@stevenv6463

2 жыл бұрын

@@TabeshKhan Yes, search on Wiktionary and it'll show you. It comes from the ancient Greek word κανών which apparently comes from the word for reed which was Akkadian. (The Arabic for reed is قناة, a cognate, which also means channel) Arabic had Greek loan words in general, don't forget how influential it was after Alexander the Great. So for example the words قلم (pen) and لص (thief) come from Greek too. There are also Greek words that came from Semitic languages like the word for rope, camel, wine, etc.

@TabeshKhan

2 жыл бұрын

@@stevenv6463 wicktionary does state that, So we can say that it found its way into English through arabic.

I believe Aristotle was more of a 4th century BC kind of guy. There are stories that he tutored Alexander the Great (356-323 BCE).

Ibn Sina was raised in Horezim palaces. He was a proponent of Greek philosophy. He dominated over Al Biruni who was more modern scientist. That was unfortunate.

@almazchati4178

2 жыл бұрын

@Batman Robin Dickson Good.

So the speaker says الله الصمد means contignecy, how so?

Science is based on Experiments which is based on Resources and Time. Both of which are from Allah.

I am so happy that I will finish nearly One if the best book about theo-philosophical thought of Algazhali written by Frank griffel . But this book talks about avecina more than about Algazhali 😂😂even though its dedicated to the theology of Algazhali

Interestingly, AlGhazali himself was criticized by orthodox sunnis of his time like Yusuf Ibn Tashfin, leader of the Almoravids Empire. Yusuf even ordered that copies of "ihya uloom Ed dine". Al ghazali would end up teaching Ibn tumart, who founded the Almohads, and overruled the Almoravids in the mid 12th century.

@samboy90

2 жыл бұрын

Because he was also a philosopher.

I think if you can interview Dimitri ghutas is much better...he is the most expert in Ibn sinna

45:00 amazing point even Algazhali laugh at philosopher when they claim we know all things thru reason including heavenly intellects , Algazhali said shut up 😎 u copied from early prophets and u then rationalise

@sutil5078

2 жыл бұрын

thanks but I did not see him saying that in the time stamp you wrote. did Algazali say that?

@sutil5078

2 жыл бұрын

I believe many civilization have copied from prophets whose name are now lost, even some religious figures in different civilization may have been true prophet but people tendency to worship them distorted their image.

@CabdifataaxCardiologist

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah he didn't say I.e hamza karamali but gazhali blatantly said to philosopher that they know nothing by reason alone except few things so most of things they claim to know Algazhali said u copied from earlier prophets then u philosophize . U can it from book known as " Algazhali philosophical theology " written by frank griffel

@sutil5078

2 жыл бұрын

@@CabdifataaxCardiologist thanks that is funny and good answer.. I always had such suspecion that many old worshipped figures were prophets.. (some ) but people change their teaching.. thanks

Paul ! You should invite philosophers to comment on Philosopher not some takferi guy who see things with a certain angle only . Considering Ibn Sina not a religious guy and he RA was a Hafiz by 10 says a lot about your guests Prejudices against Ibn Sina . That’s the problem with theologians they put their schools glasses on and see the whole world thru it . Your questions exposed him badly . Thanks for that . “Identify the TRUTH ( Haq) and then look for Ahle Haq “ . Hazrat Ali RA

@rethabilefeni4694

3 ай бұрын

what do you mean ibn Sina was not a religious guy? wasn't he a devout Muslim?

IBN RUCHD PLEASE...

Ibn Sina (and Aboo Nasr al-Farabi) is to be regarded as kafir due to his incorrect deviant creed. His takfir was not only from Imam Al Gazahli but Shaykh al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah and Imam Ibn Qayyim al-Jowziyyah. In fact Imam Ibn Qayyim al-Jowziyyah pointed out he had a deviant aqeedah in the following (which all led to his takfir): his understanding of Allaah, the Angels, the Books, the Messengers, and the Last Day. Furthermore, Imam Ibn Hajr quotes an early Shaafi’ee scholar, Shaykh Ibn Abid-Damm al-Hamawee, as saying: "All the scholars have agreed that Ibn Sina held that the universe was infinite and there would be no physical resurrection, while he did not reject (the concept of) a spiritual resurrection, and that he is reported to have said that Allaah does not know every detailed piece of knowledge, rather He knows things in general. Thus, the scholars of his time and those after him whose statements are relied upon in all matters have spoken decisively about his disbelief and the disbelief of Aboo Nasr al-Farabi as well, due to their positions on these matters in contradiction to the beliefs of the Muslims." Ref: Lisaan al-Meezaan (2/293) None of this takes away from the fact as a philosopher he was influential and thst he was a renowned medical doctor. However, he was not a Muslim due to his creed, which put him beyond the fold of Islam.

@rethabilefeni4694

3 ай бұрын

this is stupid. since when do you need this creed to be a Muslim? i'm not saying you are stupid, i'm just saying the statement itself is stupid. ibn Sina was a practicing and devout Muslim who had different ideas and views of God. this is why so many people are leaving religion all together. because some people want us to have one specific (fixed) view on God and Islam and if not, you are not a Muslim when that's problematic. only Allah knows if he was right or wrong BUT we as people who have a very finite understanding and knowledge of God's universe and the concept of Who God is, can't be walking around and accusing people of "kafir" when we don't have a DEFINITIVE answer of Who God really is. we may have ideas and theologies BUT we can't really say, again Allah knows who is right. if Allah knows ibn Sina was wrong of his views about Him then only God can say, but we as people can't be going around as if we can't also not fallible. may Allah be pleased with him and as efforts whilst he was still on earth.

@Jobeth.57

3 ай бұрын

@@rethabilefeni4694 true

May be alghazali didn't want to declare him heretic because he was long gone and not there to defend himself .

I can't imagine how much western theologians have missed by not studying Islamic theology as an academic discipline! Judging from the guests on this channel, Muslim theologians have a better grasp of theology in general and Christianity in particular.

✌😇🧘‍♂️

Love Asharis....... the intellectual level and openeness of mind is mind blowing compared to neo salafis

@weshouldsaveourselves6780

Жыл бұрын

we follow islam. not some greek religion. if you want to delve into logic and reason and reject divine revelation and the sayings of our Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, then im sorry but you need help. severe help

@abdelhakyac7285

Жыл бұрын

@@weshouldsaveourselves6780 keep quiet and spare us that evil in your heart........ If there is a lesson I can give to neo-salafis, because you ARE EVERYTHING but the likes of classical salafis ..... is to keep quiet, pray your fives, fast your ramadhan, give zakat and try to perform hajj...... more than that, keep quiet........ because in one simple commentary, the like of you as you can see can easily condemn me to blasphemy by claiming i reject divine revelation and the sunnah....... why not telling me i am a kafir?? you wanna play your soul, all your deeds in one commentary?? try it?? you'll see the results in the hereafter..........by the way I dont even see myself as an ashari........... but the level of ego they got you into ..... ibliss himself feels inferior to that....... revise your soul, revise you aqeedah, revise you deeds, and especially your tongue....... اتقي الله

@weshouldsaveourselves6780

Жыл бұрын

@@abdelhakyac7285 im not saying youre a kafir. i cant say to anyone they are a kafir because im not a scholar or great imam. im simply saying that what the deviant groups who left ahlus sunna Wal Jamaah early on believe in is simply false as is the opinion of most well versed imams and scholars. the four great imams may Allah have mercy on them all agreed that Allah is above the arsh and the arsh is above the heavens. Abu Muti' Al-Balkhi reported:"I asked Imam Abu Hanifah about a person who says, 'I do not know whether my Rubb is, above the heavens or on earth?' Abu Hanifah, may Allah grant him His mercy, said: 'A person who makes such a statement becomes an apostate because Allah, the Exalted says, 'The Merciful has ascended above the 'Arsh, and the 'Arsh of Allah is above His heavens'. I further asked Abu Hanifah, 'What if such a person admits, Allah is above His 'Arsh, but exclaims, I do not know whether His 'Arsh is above the heavens or on earth'. Abu Hanifah responded: 'If he denies that the 'Arsh is above the heavens, he is an apostate."[44] the Asharis and the other completely lost groups who dont know the quran and sunnah quite frankly, have misled millions of muslims. for you to support them is something quite shocking and sad. instead of supporting the way of the salaf and the understanding of the three righteous generations, and those who advocate to take from the Quran and sunnah and to take what is good and sound from the great imams, instead of this you are supporting strange ideas that have no basis in islam

sadly with the rise of najdi sect ,intolerance has permeated into Muslims also

( Do Christians And Jews and "OTHER" non-Muslims go to Heaven? ) Quran 2:62 '' Those who believe (in the Quran) and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures) and the Christians and the Sabians->ANYAllah Quran 22:40 [They are] those who have been evicted from their homes without right - only because they say, " Our Lord is God " And were it not that God checks the people, some by means of others, there would have been demolished monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques in which the name of God is much mentioned. And God will surely support those who support Him. Indeed, God is Powerful and Exalted in Might. Note: Why did Allah protected Churches and Synagogues if they worship false Allah ? ( Why Are There So Many Different Religions In The World ? ) Quran 5 48 ''...... If God wanted He could have made all of you a single nation.( ie single religion ) But He willed otherwise in order to test you in what He has given you (ie Scriptures) therefore try to excel one another in good deeds. Ultimately you all shall return to God then He will show you the truth of those matters in which you '' >DISPUTE verb Islam mean "submission" to God ( The above verse saying is that God will not accept a religion from the >MUSLIM Question: How Can Muslim And the Non-Muslim "submit" to the God? Answer: Be kind to other human beings and Do not lie, Do not steal, Do not cheat, Do not hurt others, Do not be prideful and Do the charity work. Note: If you obeyed all the ABOVE Allah-God's moral laws "YOU" submitted to God.( ie Islam mean "submission" to God ) The only people who will enter Paradise those who '' Submitted to God '' ( ie by Good Deeds ) God does NOT accept your religion of birth but only ''Your Total'' Submission to Him. ( God Allows Interfaith Marriages And Eat Food From the Christian And Jew And Vice Versa ) Quran 5:5 ''This day [all] good foods have been made lawful, and the food of those who were given the Scripture (ie Christian and Jew) is lawful for you and your food is lawful for them. And lawful in marriage are chaste women from among the believers (ie Muslim ) and chaste women from among those who were given the Scripture (ie Christian and Jew) before you, when you have given them their due compensation, desiring chastity not unlawful sexual intercourse or taking [secret] lovers. And whoever denies the faith - his work has become worthless and he in the Hereafter will be among the losers.'' Note: > Only 14 hundredsSame God ALL Corrupt Question to Muslim and Christian: Does God / Allah only answer your pray ? And God / Allah does not answer non Muslim / non Christian pray? Did Allah '' Canceled '' all other religions Judaism and Christianity? Quran 5:48 '' And We have revealed to you [O Muhammad] the Book in truth, confirming that which preceded it of the Scripture ( ie New and old Testament ) and as a criterion over it. So judge between them by what Allah has revealed and do not follow their inclinations away from what has come to you of the truth. >>>TO EACH OF YOU WE PRESCRIBED A LAW AND A METHODone nation>differ qualified On the day of judgement God will ''NOT'' judge humanity bases on Sunni Muslim sect VS Shia Muslim sect ''NOR'' by Muslim VS non-Muslim >but '' YOUR " birth in the Muslim's family is NOT a > qualification '' YOUR " religion / sect / foot long beard is NOT a > qualification The > qualification Faith in God and Good Work

@kalijasin

2 жыл бұрын

How do you reconcile that with the fact that the Christians are largely for the most part Mušrikūn?

Both Ibn Taymiyyah and Al-ghazali takfired ibn Sina, makes me feel guilty considering ibn Sina is a brilliant mind; but he clearly had kufr views like the eternal universe.

@mrty5213

2 жыл бұрын

Not a fan of Ibn Sina but, Ibn Taymiyyah was takfired just as much

@dhuss14

2 жыл бұрын

Ibn Taymiyyah had takfir done on him as well and had deviant beliefs. But the Najdis don't seem ready for that.

@devilwarrior5285

2 жыл бұрын

@@dhuss14 Deviant beliefs such as?

@ukasxm8245

Жыл бұрын

@@dhuss14 who was ibn Taymiyyah takfired by? He’s considered a Shayk-ul-Islam by literally all schools of Aqaa’id.

@weshouldsaveourselves6780

Жыл бұрын

@@mrty5213 wheres your evidence. what did he do that was wrong? dont say such a thing and not back it up. may Allah guide you

According to my family's genealogical research, I am directly descended from one of the women hung as a witch during the Salem Witch Trials in Massachusestts, U. S. 1692. History of Christian persecution is not foreign to me. I am familiar with Calvinism too. Many people in U.S. society are comforted by the notion that predestination made them rich. God smiled on them. They are chosen. Former President Trump benefits from this Calvinist convenient delusion, I think. Regarding the theory of contingency, as I understand it; material exists, so it must have been created, so there must have been a time before creation when the universe didn't exist. However, God exists. Was there a time before God existed? How was God created? Who created God? Not intending to offend. Just wishing for a clarification.

@zafthedon

2 жыл бұрын

No contingent means dependent, what it shows is that the universe or more accurately existence itself is not necessary so it needs something necessary to bring it about, it has nothing to do with time or causality or infinity. That necessary thing is God.

@sutil5078

2 жыл бұрын

Chuck no problem brother, you say "However, God exists. Was there a time before God existed? How was God created? Who created God? " 1. time is in our realm. .God is outside the laws of time space..that we know of . 2. God is uncreated, if he were created then the one who created him would be God, and if that God was created then the one who created him would be God... you see if the chain continue we would not have this universe because it is to the infinity... But we know this world exist 3. God in Quran said " Say, He is Allah, the One and Only. Allah the Eternal. He begets none, nor was he begotten. And there is nothing equal or comparable to him " surah al ikhlas. 4. The existence of God is proofed by this old philosophical argument: which I word it this way: Human can not invent anything from scratch. If you say "we invented the car" the car is modification from plastic which is from petroleum and glasses from sand and metal ..if you say we draw dragon! it is inspired by the shape of snake and crocodile.. the only thing that human seems to invent from scratch is the idea of God. Where did he get that from? Islam has the answer to this argument which even the 6 atheists I have debated long time ago admitted could not have satisfying answer. Quran said that Allah installed (ingrained) in us the knowledge of his existence and it is called Fitrah. That is why we have that natural inclination. feel free to refute, debate, add. May God (Allaha in Aramaic which is Jesus native language) Allah guide you and all of us. Amin

@chuckhillier4153

2 жыл бұрын

@@sutil5078 Thank you for that thoughtful reply

@sutil5078

2 жыл бұрын

@@chuckhillier4153 don't mention it, I enjoyed your post ..it must be scary trials I saw some documentary about it long time ago. As for predestination I agree with you.. it is delusional to believe that way it is kind of self entitlement, in fact to offer you our perspective Allah said these eye opening verses: Some non Muslims, especially evangelical, and others say we are predestined and look at us in advanced countries while "if God is with you why you suffer and we live attractive life" 1. they forget that they have lived in difficult time in Dark ages, and at wars until ww2... 2. they brushed the fact that Muslim countries when they did their homework right enjoyed 8 or 9 centuries of advancement and civilization.. and contributed to science, medicine etc etc.. 3. They forget that many in Africa, Asia, S. America have tough time though they are non muslims. But aside from the above points Quran has a revealing and interesting answer, God many times give disbelievers and associators more, a lot in this world, I just tell you this to show the other side of this argument: (33)"And if it were not that the people would become one community [of disbelievers], We would have made for those who disbelieve in the Most Merciful - for their houses - ceilings and stairways of silver upon which to mount" (34 ) And for their houses - doors and couches [of silver] upon which to recline ( 35 ) And gold ornament. But all that is not but the enjoyment of worldly life. And the Hereafter with your Lord is for the righteous. " Quran 43-33 to 35 This life means so little To Almighty that he would give non believer all this but here is the nuance: he does not give them THAT MUCH so believers won't fail the test and join them and all become one community of disbelievers, But the nuance is that he give them A LOT, but not that much. This agree with this hadith of our prophet Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said, " if the world worth To Allah a wing of mosquito, He would not have given a drink of water to unbeliever." Hasan sahih, Al Tirmidhi. God who is Just mentioned that anyone does good deeds is compensated for it: the disbelievers will receive it in this life, but will meet their Lord empty handed. and believers who sins or does not do his homework properly will be pay the price in this life, so he comes clean to God in that Day. So disbelievers nations who made advances in medicine, increasing life comfort and produced good medicinal practice, vaccines, anesthesia, AC, cars, mobiles etc., though mostly did it for profit, are having their compensation in this life for their GOOD deeds (though some donation or charity work are for lowering taxes, or praise or fame, or influence etc , And believers, who slack and become lazy or not organized will pay for it, because it is our duty to be useful, but if we fail on that God did not promise to intervene and give unconditional support, but this may wash their sins. God made that clear in the Quran in many verses. God may even give them more to whom he will to the tough disbelievers. And do not be grieved, [O Muúammad], by those who hasten into disbelief. Indeed, they will never harm Allah at all. Allah intends that He should give them no share in the Hereafter, and for them is a great punishment. 177. Indeed, those who purchase disbelief [in exchange] for faith - never will they harm Allah at all, and for them is a painful punishment. 178. And let not those who disbelieve ever think that [because] We extend their time [of enjoyment] it is better for them. We only extend it for them so that they may increase in sin, and for them is a humiliating punishment. Quran 3-176 to 178 Another example of "not all that glitter is gold" think of the MAIN messages and prophets were chosen in arid deserts or dry region, why Did not God choose lush and green lands? God knows best, though He sent in each regions prophets and warmers. The main Messengers, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Mohammad peace be upon them, were chosen in dry region. God chose the most arid scene to talk to Moses, so not all that glitters for human is gold. This particular point is speculation from my part but what seems to human arid, dry or unattractive was chosen by Our Lord, the Creator of this earth itself. These verses are revealing and deep if we meditate on it.. It solves an important part of the "puzzles" of certain wealth distribution etc. That is what I understand, and God knows best. What I mean by all this, is if a person is rich it maybe because God love his pure charity work, OR to test him, or to misguide him... we may think we earn it.. but God is the giver of all this. We work with fear and gratefulness and do the best we can and God is the ultimate provider, not the predestination. I agree Chuck. PS: as for Trump I remember a reporter asking an American man in the street about trump (when the news came out saying that he only paid 1500 dollars of taxes in the past 15 years) they said "but he report 400 million loss" the man said "well I voted for him thinking he was a successful business man I did not know that he was not good at business, and that he made his first money from his father who was rich anyway" the man was funny. Please feel free to agree or refute, doubt etc. in the mean time have a great day.

@derekallen4568

2 жыл бұрын

yes! There was a time when God didn't exist. that was when man wasn't man yet. he was still evolving. Our pre-human ancestors probably worshiped some sort of deity, like the moon or stars. Man then made up many God's, Hindus still believe in many God's but Abrahamic religious whittled it down to one God. if there was a God why would there be so many religions? Man has been making up God's for at least 50 000 years.

Can you respectfully ask the sheik for the birth record of your messenger in Quran? Do you realize how fundamental it is to know anyone's real name? Will you give away your daughter in marriage to a man without this record? What more that you are giving away your soul?

اسم ایشان ابوعلی حسین بود، و ایشان در بلخ تولد شده بود

Should have asked the question . Should we consider ibn sina as kafir?

@zakyzayn5361

2 жыл бұрын

Don't fight guys leave it to Allah Ibn Qudamah’s (d.641H/1267CE) authoratative fiqh manual, al-Kafi, states: ‘Apostasy (riddah) occurs by retracting the two shahadahs, or any one of them; vilifying Allah, Exalted and Holy is He, or His Prophet, upon whom be peace; falsely impugning the honour of the Prophet’s mother; rejecting any part of the Book of Allah; [rejecting] one of His prophets, or one of His books; rejecting a clear-cut agreed upon obligation, like the five [pillars of] worship; making lawful a well-known agreed upon prohibition, like wine, pork, carrion, blood, illicit intercourse or the like.

@mohamudahmed6554

2 жыл бұрын

@@zakyzayn5361 You are the same guy that just called a brother deviant for no reason. Apply your own teachings to yourself first.

@zakyzayn5361

2 жыл бұрын

@@mohamudahmed6554 i mock only Thoose who do takfir of other not those who don't takfir other or call other ahleul bidah to create fitna

@zakyzayn5361

2 жыл бұрын

@ahmad hanbal bro go to bed have long sleep wake up get gusul , pray fajr have breakfast and think about you comment

@zakyzayn5361

2 жыл бұрын

@ahmad hanbal like you can't be that dumb ibn Sina gave concept of wajib al wajud , Ibn Arabi ra gave Whadatul Wajud

What is Indian subcontinent? None such thing. Is Karamali a patriotic Indian person ?

most of the guests on blogging theology are insightful and produce useful information and can be watched more than once except this guest (I'm sure he is well informed and knowledgeable and better than me) but for some reason can't finish any of his videos on this channel. I don't know why but it feels like my knowledge lost part of it while listening to him. may be his thoughts are not well organized when he talks. Again he is way much knowledgeable than me but I can't listen,. This comment is coming from a dedicated follower of Blogging Theology. thank you.

Ibn Sino wasnot Persian. Because at the time even Uzbek nation wasn't formed fully yet

@abdumalikkarimov2905

2 күн бұрын

😂😂😂😂 he was 100% persian and he was shia

Speaking negative about Ibn Sina ; I am never going to buy the book he wrote. One of the most useful advise of Ibn Sina as a physician is if you over eat one day fast the other day . I do agree with his advise 100 %.

@mohammedelzhhaf985

Жыл бұрын

It's David's fast to eat one day and fast the other

@mohammedelzhhaf985

Жыл бұрын

داود عليه السلام

Ibn sina was made takfir of by 'Ulamaa

@aksalafi

6 ай бұрын

Ibn Sina (and Aboo Nasr al-Farabi) is to be regarded as kafir due to his incorrect deviant creed. His takfir was not only from Imam Al Gazahli but Shaykh al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah and Imam Ibn Qayyim al-Jowziyyah. In fact Imam Ibn Qayyim al-Jowziyyah pointed out he had a deviant aqeedah in the following (which all led to his takfir): his understanding of Allaah, the Angels, the Books, the Messengers, and the Last Day. Furthermore, Imam Ibn Hajr quotes an early Shaafi’ee scholar, Shaykh Ibn Abid-Damm al-Hamawee, as saying: "All the scholars have agreed that Ibn Sina held that the universe was infinite and there would be no physical resurrection, while he did not reject (the concept of) a spiritual resurrection, and that he is reported to have said that Allaah does not know every detailed piece of knowledge, rather He knows things in general. Thus, the scholars of his time and those after him whose statements are relied upon in all matters have spoken decisively about his disbelief and the disbelief of Aboo Nasr al-Farabi as well, due to their positions on these matters in contradiction to the beliefs of the Muslims." Ref: Lisaan al-Meezaan (2/293) None of this takes away from the fact as a philosopher he was influential and thst he was a renowned medical doctor. However, he was not a Muslim due to his creed, which put him beyond the fold of Islam.

Now I understand why French laïcs support and promote al Ghazali over any Muslim philosoph.

I wish this guy would give references like Engineer Muhammad Ali Mirza.

Ibn Sina was a heretic, just do you research yaa ikhwaan..

@786humaira1

2 жыл бұрын

Do study or develop talents like ibn Sina , or stay ignorent ?

@aksalafi

6 ай бұрын

Ibn Sina (and Aboo Nasr al-Farabi) is to be regarded as kafir due to his incorrect deviant creed. His takfir was not only from Imam Al Gazahli but Shaykh al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah and Imam Ibn Qayyim al-Jowziyyah. In fact Imam Ibn Qayyim al-Jowziyyah pointed out he had a deviant aqeedah in the following (which all led to his takfir): his understanding of Allaah, the Angels, the Books, the Messengers, and the Last Day. Furthermore, Imam Ibn Hajr quotes an early Shaafi’ee scholar, Shaykh Ibn Abid-Damm al-Hamawee, as saying: "All the scholars have agreed that Ibn Sina held that the universe was infinite and there would be no physical resurrection, while he did not reject (the concept of) a spiritual resurrection, and that he is reported to have said that Allaah does not know every detailed piece of knowledge, rather He knows things in general. Thus, the scholars of his time and those after him whose statements are relied upon in all matters have spoken decisively about his disbelief and the disbelief of Aboo Nasr al-Farabi as well, due to their positions on these matters in contradiction to the beliefs of the Muslims." Ref: Lisaan al-Meezaan (2/293) None of this takes away from the fact as a philosopher he was influential and thst he was a renowned medical doctor. However, he was not a Muslim due to his creed, which put him beyond the fold of Islam.

@rethabilefeni4694

3 ай бұрын

no he wasn't. you think he was a heretic based on the theology you believe him, BUT he wasn't OBJECTIVELY a heretic. only Allah knows best.

Ibn Sina was an apostate. He didn't influence the rightly guided imams of Islam, he informed other deviant thinkers, philosophers and theologians (mutakallimun), just as he was influenced by Greek deviant philosophy. He has no bearing on Islam. That's the first time I've seen Paul drop the ball.

@nejmcabdudsalaam168

2 жыл бұрын

I'm guessing that you didn't listen before commenting, Paul explicitly mentioned 3 explicit points of ibn Sina's contradiction of the Qur'ān, and directly asked about takfir

@disuser-lp3qv1tm8f

2 жыл бұрын

@@nejmcabdudsalaam168 My point is that such a figure should not be discussed in the first place (except for a scholarly purpose by experts who stand on firm grounds, or to explicitly warn the public against engaging with him if such a danger were to exist, which it doesn't).

@samantarmaxammadsaciid5156

2 жыл бұрын

@@disuser-lp3qv1tm8f You said "Ibn Sina was apostate", and who are you to determine who should remain a Muslim and who should be ousted? Did Allaah personally empower you to determine such a thing?

@disuser-lp3qv1tm8f

2 жыл бұрын

@@samantarmaxammadsaciid5156 That's a dumb question. Allah made it very clear who is and who isn't. And in the case of the apostate Ibn Sina, it's even more clear because he unashamedly contradicts some of th most basic beliefs of Islam. If you like Ibn Sina, either your knowledge or your faith is defective (or both), and I hope it's the former.

@samantarmaxammadsaciid5156

2 жыл бұрын

@@disuser-lp3qv1tm8f If it is a dumb question, then tell me precisely where Allaah made it very clear who is and who isn't? Then tell me how you directly relate that to Ibn Sina?

Ibn Sina is actually an Islamic scholar, he was a Hanafi scholar

@turan_kaya

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah man probably with maturidi aqida :-)

@Hamza00011

2 жыл бұрын

@@turan_kaya wahabi

@aksalafi

6 ай бұрын

Ibn Sina (and Aboo Nasr al-Farabi) is to be regarded as kafir due to his incorrect deviant creed. His takfir was not only from Imam Al Gazahli but Shaykh al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah and Imam Ibn Qayyim al-Jowziyyah. In fact Imam Ibn Qayyim al-Jowziyyah pointed out he had a deviant aqeedah in the following (which all led to his takfir): his understanding of Allaah, the Angels, the Books, the Messengers, and the Last Day. Furthermore, Imam Ibn Hajr quotes an early Shaafi’ee scholar, Shaykh Ibn Abid-Damm al-Hamawee, as saying: "All the scholars have agreed that Ibn Sina held that the universe was infinite and there would be no physical resurrection, while he did not reject (the concept of) a spiritual resurrection, and that he is reported to have said that Allaah does not know every detailed piece of knowledge, rather He knows things in general. Thus, the scholars of his time and those after him whose statements are relied upon in all matters have spoken decisively about his disbelief and the disbelief of Aboo Nasr al-Farabi as well, due to their positions on these matters in contradiction to the beliefs of the Muslims." Ref: Lisaan al-Meezaan (2/293) None of this takes away from the fact as a philosopher he was influential and thst he was a renowned medical doctor. However, he was not a Muslim due to his creed, which put him beyond the fold of Islam.

One thing Mr Paul just stay away from Ibn Taymiyah and focus more on Noble Islamic Scholars like ( Ibn Sina , Muhammad Al-Shafiʽi , Ibn Rushd , abu hanefa , ibn taymiyah was declared a heretic and was thrown into jail and died there , non Arabic speakers will find it hard to figure out his ideological background because of the language barrier , Al Azhar for example prohibits the teaching of this man and his thoughts about God are only viewed as a history of islamic literature since we know that his definition of God led many to doubt the his Existence

@BloggingTheology

2 жыл бұрын

Can you quote an example from the work of Ibn Taymiyya that is problematic?

@DAWAHTIME1

2 жыл бұрын

"Noble Islamic scholats like ibn sina " speaks volumes of your intellectual capacity

@dhuss14

2 жыл бұрын

Ibn Taymiyyah had takfir done on him as well and had deviant beliefs. But the Najdis don't seem ready for that.

@Muhammad_Nuruddin

2 жыл бұрын

Imam Ahmad was also thrown in jail because he refused to conform with mu'tazilite ideology. Was he declared a heretic as well?

@quantumgravity92

2 жыл бұрын

@@BloggingTheology of course it's called ( book of Tawheed ) but beware it's a 600 pages book by Saudi Prof Muhammed Al Massari not written for the general public since it requires a very deep understanding of ( Quran , Logic . Hadith , Islamic History ) Ibn Taymiyah had the ideology of al Khawarij and the Prophet peace be upon him warned us many times in multiple hadiths of their coming and he even ORDERED us to kill them . to give you a better picture The prophet didn't tell Muslims to kill Jews , Christians or believers of other Religions but he demanded the killing of al Khawarij when they appear which tells a lot

Ibn e Sina was not an Islamic scholar but rather pseudo one. Yes of course a great scientist but a deviant and a believer in Baatino Aquida

@zakyzayn5361

2 жыл бұрын

Ok same goes for you also

@mohamudahmed6554

2 жыл бұрын

@@zakyzayn5361 What is said about Ibn Sina is stated by the Ulama of Ahl Sunnah. What you just did is call a brother a deviant just because you didn't like what he said. This isn't permissible to be labeling anyone a deviant as a layman and here you are.

@zakyzayn5361

2 жыл бұрын

@@mohamudahmed6554 quote some scholars who were contemporary of Avicenna who said he is Kafir and bid'ati not some who came 100 yrs after him or 300 yrs after him

@mohamudahmed6554

2 жыл бұрын

@@zakyzayn5361 Why a contemporary?

@emkfenboi

2 жыл бұрын

@@zakyzayn5361 why does it have to be contemporary?

Hope this guy doesn't train his 10,000 teachers with this garbage. He seriously said Ibn Sina disagreed with the Qur'an and had his arguments for it; and then just shrugged his shoulders as if it were nothing. Someone convey to this man that he's on a dangerous course if not already fallen in some pit dug by Satan.

@maxwellmallery5638

2 жыл бұрын

You completely misunderstood his point. He never said that Ibn Sina's reasons were valid. He said he had his reasons and shrugged his shoulders because what else can he do. You've taken this one section and isolated it from the rest of the talk. He literally said that Imam al-Ghazali highlighted the flaw in Ibn Sina's arguments.

@disuser-lp3qv1tm8f

2 жыл бұрын

@@maxwellmallery5638 what else can he do? Let's see. First, don't discuss this deviant figure at all. Second, if you discuss him, do it away from the public else the ignorant follow in his deviant path, 3 warn against him by plainly and clearly showing that some of his ideas amount to kufr. Shrugging your shoulders is not an Islamic thing to do when confronted with kufr. It's you who completely misunderstand what's at stake.

@maxwellmallery5638

2 жыл бұрын

@@disuser-lp3qv1tm8f There is no doubt that Ibn Sina has impacted Islamic theology There is no one in the Muslim world interested in Ibn Sina who is unaware of the flaws in his arguments As mentioned most people are aware of al-Ghazali's Incoherence of the Philosophers There is no threat of anyone following this "deviant"t You're just overreacting

@disuser-lp3qv1tm8f

2 жыл бұрын

@@maxwellmallery5638 There is no such thing as Islamic theology. It's all one big deviation from Islam, so in that sense it's not Islamic. He didn't just have an impact on the gibberish, he co-created it. That doesn't make him important or anything. Al-Ghazali had his own flaws and deviations (less dangerous than Ibn Sina's). And you're obviously wrong about the risks. The fact that people are willing to defend him says enough. What is worse, a lot of young (and old) Muslims who think theology (Kalam) is interesting are being misled by this and other figures. The history of Christianity has shown the devastating impact theology can have. Islamic history has shown some of its dangers (eg. the fitnah of the Creation of the Qur'an). Take heed and steer clear is what I'm saying. Theology=philosophy=deviation form the straight path=Satan's path=hell (unless one repents as some early mutakallimun did when their time drew near).

@samboy90

2 жыл бұрын

@@disuser-lp3qv1tm8f You're wasting your time with these people. Have a scroll down at the ignoramuses in the comment section who are defending zindiq Kaffir Ibn Sina to the hilt. One clown told Paul not to promote Ibn Taymiyyah rahimulAllah but rather focus on real "scholars" like Ibn Sina. Lol