a lady that knows what she is talking about,nuclear would take up a fraction of the land usage of the current panels and wind mills disfiguring the country side.

@ZELJKO472

11 күн бұрын

In 100 years they will still be talking about climate change and armegeddon. Heard every dire prediction imaginable since the 50s.

@Lost_on_stage_again

11 күн бұрын

Not to mention all that rubbish going straight into landfill.

@rattusfinkus

11 күн бұрын

no power for you then until 2045

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

@@rattusfinkus dream on

@rattusfinkus

11 күн бұрын

@@positivepawpaw7564 prove me wrong sunshine. Why are the Chinese installing more renewables than anything else? Why is the world installing more renewables than anything else?

I would be happy to have nuclear energy in Australia. We need a base load than can supply 24/7, wind and solar cannot do that.

Rather a nuclear reactor than a pracrically useless self immolating battery bank

@rattusfinkus

11 күн бұрын

no power for you then until 2045

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

@@rattusfinkus no cigar again, troll. you must be on hoilmes a court's pay roll.

@RalphEllis

11 күн бұрын

For the true cost of wind power. Add in a Snowy-3, to every large wind farm. Renewables cannot work without backup. And that doubles or trebles the cost. R

@derekmottley3656

11 күн бұрын

Free, free free free bag of dirt with your solar panels.

@rattusfinkus

11 күн бұрын

@@RalphEllis No it doesn't, we need very little storage. And Snowy 2.0 is an LNP disaster, they did the initial costings and pulled the trigger on that project, imagine how they'd do with dozens of nukes?

I’ll take a nuclear reactor.

@rattusfinkus

11 күн бұрын

no power for you then until 2045

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

@@rattusfinkus you wish

@rattusfinkus

11 күн бұрын

@@positivepawpaw7564 I wish you would use facts instead of empty rhetoric.

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

@@rattusfinkus "FACTS" . . . COMING FROM YOU, MISINFORMATION TROLL, THAT WAS A JOKE.

@Lost_on_stage_again

11 күн бұрын

@@positivepawpaw7564 Don't feed the bots.

Nuclear energy means cheaper electricity, lets lift the ban and join the rest of the world.

@Poorlineforeva

11 күн бұрын

No it doesn't. Nuclear is the most expensive of all

@HellHound.933

11 күн бұрын

​@Poorlineforeva Show us the Figures. Mr Know-it-all.

@joshuapraeger534

11 күн бұрын

Name the country where this is true?

@jonathoncalabrese2035

11 күн бұрын

@@Poorlineforevalay off the pipe dkhead

@ZELJKO472

11 күн бұрын

Poorline You can't even provide energy for 27 million people. Face it, your politicians are useless and they get all their energy from China.

Labor keeps saying nuclear reactors are too expensive to build. Here’s a thought 🤔 drop the nuclear moratorium and see how much interest there is by investors. This labor government wants to keep the Australian people shackled to this ridiculous green dream. I actually would love to see one up close. Clean energy and a tourist attraction win win!!!

@Larry-Livermore

11 күн бұрын

This is the first time Labor has ever said something is too expensive.😃

@awc900

11 күн бұрын

Labor keeps saying renewables are cheap which they are if you look at them stand alone but when you factor in the enormous cost of expanding the grid to accommodate them, they are exactly the opposite. Not to mention much poorer longevity and reliability when compared to nuclear.

@Lost_on_stage_again

11 күн бұрын

@@Larry-Livermore Apparently perpetual motion pumped hydro boondoggles are cheaper.

@rattusfinkus

11 күн бұрын

guess what? no moratorium overseas and global nuclear generation is in decline

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

@@rattusfinkus false.

Here in South Australia would be perfect. We have Torrens Island and Port Augusta sites

24x7 power like sane countries have. Russia and China have 24x7 cheap energy for everyone and cheap.

@Poorlineforeva

11 күн бұрын

And look what happened. A communist dictatorship

@bretloyd8097

11 күн бұрын

Both are cheap because they have NOT PRIVATISED their power industry. . . . Like nearly all of Australia's power industry.

"Renewable" energy is a joke of a term.

@tlb2970

11 күн бұрын

Renewables energy is renewable every 15-20 years, how expensive is that labor?

@ZELJKO472

11 күн бұрын

No such thing as renewable. Is a totally false term. Are there renewable cars?.After 20 years when it is dead it is dead

Same. I'll help them build it, work inside it, and enjoy getting my very cheap electricity bills.

Western Australia here, we been selling gas to countries cheaper than we locals buy it. Lots of room for Nuclear over in the west.. Bring in here please

Oh, they've finally worked out that they're not going to meet their renewables targets, better late ten never.

I'd love to see how people would move between locations when powered by nuclear or powered only by renewables..

Other countries are using them and it's cheap power, why is Labor so into windmills etc which is destroying oceans, farm land, bushland if we follow Labor we have rolling blackout.

@rattusfinkus

11 күн бұрын

It's cheap because the grandparents have paid it off, if they build new ones it will cost dearly as it always does.

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

@@rattusfinkus another l!e .. keep em coming. obviously, if you ever told the truth you'd turn to stone.

@adrianw7011

11 күн бұрын

@@rattusfinkus The plants the grandparents paid off have been decomissioned and replaced by new units so again your baseless quip is lacking context. There are many reasons why it is cheap, a reactors very long running life of around 60 plus years (unlike wind turbines < 20 years, solar panels < 10years). Unlike solar panels and windmills, a large percentage of nuclear waste is recycled, not tipped into landfill hoping no one will notice.

@rattusfinkus

11 күн бұрын

@@adrianw7011 tell me how cheap and how long it took to build the last reactors built in the UK France Finland and USA? That's in countries with infrastructure, bureaucracies and industries with nuclear experience, we are starting from scratch.

@tassied12

11 күн бұрын

@@adrianw7011 The world has changed for nuclear since those plants built in the time of the grandparents. Safety regulations brought in after Fukishima and the rise of competing technologies have disrupted the economics of nuclear. Your figure of 60 years is optimistic. The oldest nuclear plant still operating is Beznau in Switzerland, at 55 years. This was after a 3 year refit that cost more than to build the original plant. Almost every steam turbine and many of the steam generators and control systems on current US nuclear plants have been replaced and the outages have taken from 6 months to two years. The 40 US units closed by mid-2021 - 30% of total nuclear grid connections - averaged 22 years There are windfarms in the US commissioned in the 1980s that are still operational. You can repower a wind or solar farm with no more than 5-10% loss of production during the process by refurbishing one turbine or one solar string at a time and often increase power by 10-15% and annual output by 25-150% due to technological advances.

There is lots of land free with nothing on it. But I would put one on the Qld Nsw border. Toowoomba area. One Nsw Vic borders and one in South Australia.🤠

@user-jr4uf1dc9k

11 күн бұрын

Is that where you live.?😊

@turtle-frogs

11 күн бұрын

@user-jr4uf1dc9k No. But these areas are realistic to the population distribution and distance.

Some experts? The federal government has NO CHANCE of doing so!

I really would like Jasmine to come do a speaking engagement in my seat of Mackellar approaching the next election, and take on Dr Sophie Scamps who is ant-nuclear.

Unlike Stupid Wind Mills and Solar Panels, Nuclear Power Plants doesn't take a lot of space either.

@rattusfinkus

11 күн бұрын

no power for you then until 2045

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

@@rattusfinkus if only it was up to you .. but its not. nuclear technology has left you medieval twats behind

@robertholland7558

11 күн бұрын

@@rattusfinkuswhy , a nuclear plant can be built in a few years. It is all the beaurocracy that is the major hold up.

@briananderson7285

11 күн бұрын

Same foot print as coal basically.

@rattusfinkus

11 күн бұрын

@@robertholland7558 tell me how much it cost and how long it took to build the last reactors in the UK France Finland and USA? Come on. Let's have a reality check

Centralized energy sources, including nuclear power, tend to increase costs and provide a convenient tax base for governments. Decentralized electricity generation is a far better solution. Solar PV systems on every roof, paired with three days of battery storage, can address 90% of domestic power requirements at a lower cost. Nuclear power is one of the most expensive options available. In Europe, wind energy is more viable than solar, while in Australia, solar energy is more viable than wind. A mix of renewable energy sources is often the best approach. Large-scale nuclear power is ludicrously expensive. Small modular nuclear reactors could be less costly if they utilize off-the-shelf technology, but not if they require custom designs. At the end of the day, any approach that further centralizes power generation is a disaster for household energy independence.

My dad always said he’d happily live next to a nuke, the next week was Three Mile Island. He toned it down after that 😊

Hinkley Point, the latest partly completed nuclear power plant in the UK, is already at an expected 25c/kw hr. Add the Australia tax on top and this comes out as rather expensive. Someone needs to do their homework before this drags the coalition down. Just keep to the cuts go immigration before jumping the shark with another bonkers nuclear proposal!

@Design_no

11 күн бұрын

Hinkley Point is a very specific replacement build. They built a whole town there just for the build. Your math doesn't translate to Australia.

@Design_no

11 күн бұрын

And another thing, there is no harm in doing the analysis at all. But doing nothing like the alp is plain stupid.

Visiting at nuclear power plant Would definitely be a tourist attraction for me. Maybe not all the way to Australia, but somewhere closer! If I was going to visit Australia, I would absolutely try to check out a nuclear power plant if there was tours available to the public.

You can have the nuke in your backyard and pay for it out of your own salary. The majority of nations won't meet 2030 emissions targets, no matter what system is in place. Large-scale nuclear will never occur. Dream on. Operational costs are minimal until you have to dispose of the nuclear waste. Modular SMR might have a future, but not in a major way. Renewables and battery technologies are advancing too quickly for nuclear to catch up cost-wise. Battery storage energy density is rapidly improving. Solar energy is falling in price along with wind. Aust is a massive country with a small population and can easily rollout renewables. Nuclear a lot more difficult, as Aust is so spread out, leading to many inefficiencies.

The nuclear reactors would be placed into the old coal fired stations so quickly blown up. Already a work force ready to retrain too nuclear. Startup is more cost but longevity ,100% reliability cost vastly less ,Canada and France prove that.

@tassied12

11 күн бұрын

Nowhere in the world have new nuclear plants been installed on the sites of old coal plants. Coal and nuclear have different operational requirements. And nuclear is no guarantee of reliability. Canada and France have proved that. In 2022, France lost over half its nuclear capacity, forcing them to save power by switching off the lights on the Eiffel Tower. Canada lost 28% of its nuclear capacity for 5 years between 1998-2003

If you think electricity is expensive now. You haven't seen expensive electricity yet The problems will begin if they start cutting corners trying to make them cost competitive. Just ask the French. Just miraculously double the life span of their reactor fleet. So either someone got the original life span woefully wrong or they cant afford to build new ones. I'd put money on the latter.

Won't happen

I have a Coal fired power station within 2 kilometers and I would love to see that converted to Nuclear. All the infrastructure is there already so it just comes down to changing the method of heating to water to make steam to drive the turbines.

stop listening to fools who think its going to be built next to them . or the waste buried next to their property ..

Happy to have one here too. Less background radiation than is expelled from burning coal. FACT.

The UK just signed on to rolling out small 300 MW reactors manufactured by Westinghouse….

How many industries would suddenly become fans of "Storing nuclear waste in their back yards" if dry casks came with heat exchangers allowing them to be hooked up to process vats or greenhouses? 24/7 heating for the cost of the electricity to run a circulation pump.

Wazzup from Hanford site 😊!

The Chinese have these reactors basically in kit set,they set it up you already have the fuel up and done and safe before you know it cheaper than the subs which you'll prob never see

We already have a nuclear reactor in Sydneys southern suburb of Lucas Heights even with a ban in place.

I agree I am happy to have 1 in my area.

How can nuclear be banned or illegal in Australia if we already have a nuclear facility at Lucas Heights and we are taking on nuclear submarines, it does not make sense. If the government, the greens and the other parties don't want nuclear then coal and gas will have to stay as there is no way renewables will cut it for base load dispatchable power in this country.

@450tank

10 күн бұрын

I'm pretty sure the ban came into place in 1998. It is a ban on nuclear power generation.

Sure you would smart rs. As if you dont have access to reliable energy now

" a bit misleading" Yep that sounds like Albo alright

Why would you plqce a plant near a coast or wqter system, other than to be able to use the ocean to ran off contaimonated water (poluting our ocean/ecosystems/tourist attractions), staff accessibility etc? Japans failed reactor is still bleeding radiation into the ocean and they came get close to stop the reaction bcos is to hot for even machines! Better to take advantage of our vast deserts were water can't run into waterways and waste can be disposed of safely. Extra cost to ran the power inputs but worth it in the long run.

How many SMR or micro reactors are operating in the world.

The modular nuclear looks really interesting. There's no way to get away from the hard fact we have to have base load which coal, gas and nuclear provide. People who advocate for 100% renewable know absolutely zero about how the power grid functions.

@Poorlineforeva

11 күн бұрын

One day over the rainbow 🌈

@rattusfinkus

11 күн бұрын

baseload is SOOOO 1950s

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

@@rattusfinkus typical medieval minded "green" energy, men can have babies, renewables are cheaper but more expensive nonsense from a childish GOOSE

@adrianw7011

11 күн бұрын

@@rattusfinkus and like the 1950s still required today unless you have discovered the secret of zero point energy and it's generation for the grid.

@coldwarkid6611

11 күн бұрын

I hope you're kidding 🤨​@@rattusfinkus

Yep i will have one too

Id put up land for a reactor, and im close to big transmission lines so its a quick plug into the grid.

Australia have largest Uranium reserve and Australian is not using Nuclear power plant... It is foolish... Like asking Saudi Arabia to don't drive petrol car. Or asking German people to don't use Mercedes or BMW.. Country must use own resources to prosper own people.. 😇 With electric car electricity demand will go 25X in Australia. If is it expensive then Vietnam, India, and other countries can afford.?.. 😇

I will have a coal powered power stations in my back yard with technology fitted to reduce pollution to zero ,How a bout That , a hole lot cheaper than nuklier power at this point .

@solarissv777

11 күн бұрын

"the technology fitted to reduce pollution to zero" is actually a tricky part

@bobbritten5673

11 күн бұрын

@@solarissv777 yes everything new is a bit Trickey,I understand it can be done ,and don't cost an arm and a leg Either,in compassion,to nuklier power in the meantime to get pollution on coal powered power stations down to an executable level .

@solarissv777

11 күн бұрын

@@bobbritten5673 one question: how is that supposed to work?

@bobbritten5673

10 күн бұрын

@@solarissv777 this is what the media is not telling the public about because it doesn't fit the Ajender 21 30 system ,and climet change Ajender, And wealth transfer, Are you getting the picture now ,

@solarissv777

10 күн бұрын

@@bobbritten5673 what are you talking about? I asked you what physically/chemically happens to the products of burning in your magical filtration system? But you brought up some conspiracy theories.

At least your suburb wouldnt get greemies and enviroanarchists. Thats a plus.

I would take a power plant over win turbines taking over the coast and farming land

Follow Nuclear for Australia for more content from Jaz!

Absolutely imagine the jobs and income stream filtering into any town. Win-win there.

They could be at the same sites as the coal plants as the grid is already in place. Problem solved!

Jasmin Diab would be right at home in BNF Sellafield Cumbria UK. Where Thousands of Tons of highly Radioactive waste, are 'Temporarily' stored waiting for them to finally become safe in 800 Years. Sellafield has been described as a Ticking timebomb, it's buildings storing the highly Toxic waste, in such a state of disrepair. Its estimated to need £150Bn of remedial work, just to make it safe for now. And that's before we even talk about Sea Level rise which is expected to engulf the whole Sellafield site in our children's lifetime. Which will require a whole other level of Manhattan style project to move all the Highly Radioactive Waste and Hundreds of Tons of Plutonium. The largest Plutonium stockpile in the world elsewhere. Jasmin Diab, is welcome to come and live directly, in this Environmental disaster zone, she might even enjoy it...

@bettymarshall2702

11 күн бұрын

Sea Level Rise😂😂😂😂

@Charlie-UK

11 күн бұрын

@@bettymarshall2702 Hope you don't live in any of the Coastal Towns or Cities, you or your children could be seeking, Refugee Status, before too long. Seek high ground, good luck...😉

@bettymarshall2702

11 күн бұрын

@@Charlie-UK 🤪

@Charlie-UK

11 күн бұрын

@@bettymarshall2702 I'll be thinking about you, when your sat on the roof waiting for Helicopter rescue, like they were in New Orleans. At Elevation: 171m, there isn't much chance of needing a canoe here...

Given that you appear to live in Canberra, Jasmin, I doubt there is any danger of the LNP taking you up on your generous offer.

I think it will take a bit more area than the size of a backyard.

@factnotfiction5915

11 күн бұрын

NuScale suggests 180 acres most Gen III NPPs are a few hectares

Chernobyl citizens loved their reactor. He loved them, too. The problem in Australia is distribution not the generation. If u got 1000 reactor there will still be issues and expensive power. Until an expolsion happen or it was hit with a drone. It will be so dangerouse. The half life of U234 is 1000s of years and radiation cannot be stoopped. It can be reduced but not stopped. The funmes above it smells so nice like perfume for women. It keeps them high. I never seen any propaganda like this before. All to make dutton win.

@bettymarshall2702

11 күн бұрын

What?????????????

@450tank

11 күн бұрын

Check spelling. Yourbrightspot is malfunctioning. I nearly had a stroke trying to read that.

The blond looks as if she’s got hypoglycemia. If you feel dizzy and or having blurry vision get a blood test done asap and eat candy! She got me a little worried when she was talking she looks nice but a little sick

DUTTON'S NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAM IS A GREAT IDEA 💡 YOU CAN KEEP DA LIGHT'S💡 ON. Just ask DAVAYE ALUTTA PROUD HE'S STILL ALUTTA PROUD OF DUTTONI'SSTA👋🤪 MR.MISST'A OF ANISST'A🤣

Better than having junk metal fans and wires spread all over Australia

I would rather be surrounded by solar and wind farms as at least theres no risk of a nuclear melt down that would end all people close by.

@450tank

11 күн бұрын

Technology has changed since Chernobyl.

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

then you woke up .. and saw that it isn't 1961 any more and nuclear technology has progressed to a point where you have to l!e to make nuclear reactors SOUND dangerous.

@adrianw7011

11 күн бұрын

I assume you would also be happy to be surrounded by the landfill these environmental fiascos generate at the end of their short operating lifes. You have more chance of dying from the toxins that leach out of turbine blades and solar panels than you do from a nuclear meltdown. But hey if you prefer candles and an hour or so of power a day then so be it, enjoy.

30 later some guy figured out electric core engineering vs this joke 😃😄😁😆😅 5 Smile's in the works without nukes.......

For the true cost of wind power. Add in a Snowy-3, to every large wind farm. Renewables cannot work without backup. And that doubles or trebles the cost. R

Give us one in Port Macquarie. Great jobs !

Funny if you live in Sydney you have had a Nuclear Reactor in your backyard since 1958, 😂😂😂 hilarious the scare mungers

@rattusfinkus

11 күн бұрын

That's a toy

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

@@rattusfinkus so toy reactors dont melt down or explode ? refer us to the study that shows this amazing revelation is Fact.

Lived basically next to one on Lake Norman North Carolina no problems. They’re forgetting Ai is going to need a shit load or power.

Well that's the guarantee we've all been waiting for... ALL nuclear reactors in Jasmin's backyard then!

Would you like to pay 8 times more for your electricity bill as well, Jas?

@jamesgreig5168

11 күн бұрын

A bit ignorant mate. That's what happens when you listen to Bowen's misinformation. Nuclear is expensive to build but its energy production is unlimited and cheap and keeps working from 60 to 100 years. Every state or country that has nuclear in the mix pays at least less than 50% the price we pay. Please keep up and stop listening to Bowen.7

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

hey trickyboy.. youre a grubby corporate troll/shill/goose .. this is where you refer us to some pro wind & solar propaganda from the gencost / csiro frauds.

@trickyboy1517

11 күн бұрын

@@jamesgreig5168 Ignorant? Me? Says the person that ignores the Gencost/CSIRO report. :I

How about existing power station sites for nuclear power stations... what am I missing here?

Russia has a heap of old reactors all lined up on a wharf and ready for disposal - probably cheap

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

oh alan .. save it for your men can have babies crowd. sip more vino and talk more pompous sh!t while youre at it

Lets do the math. A micro N plant @ 380million watts fits on 3970sqm of land(2xOK650 PWR's+plumbing+HPsteam turbine genies) specific output @ 96,000watts per sq metre. Solar farm for 380million watts (needs backup after dark by batteries that are net energy consumers anyway plus wind turbines, pray to the gods there is a breeze at night time), total coverage of greater than 2.1million sq metres, specific output @ 174watts per sq metre(commercial grade) less the power/energy lost due to Electrical Series Resistance built in to every metre of cabling infrastructure needed to connect it all, keeping it all free from dust and damage, high maintenance and partial outages etc and then the waste product where every solar panel degrades and requires replacement at least once before you need to refuel a Nuclear furnace once. Gees, novelty power generation stacks up eh

INSANITY PREVAILS !

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

thats what happens when you vote for the australia loses party

O shut up SKYNEWS Hydrogen power stations are only two years off why wait 15 years for Nuclear Power

@AximandTheCursed

11 күн бұрын

LOL! Hydrogen power?! Stop it, I'm getting a stitch! NO-ONE is building hydrogen power plants, anywhere! Oo-wee! Now that was funny!

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

hydrogen can't be transported or stored because it degrades metal .

@adrianw7011

11 күн бұрын

Having a little tantrum are we 😄, hydrogen power is still in its infancy and a long way off from becoming a contributor to the mainstay power grid, one day maybe but not today. Don't take my word for it, look up the research and development projections.

Clean energy my arse. Everything shits!

Renewable are anything but renewable. Let us realise this illogical statement.

If it had to be In my town and have cheap electric bill Ok let’s go

****17 Dec 2013 - The Howard government banned domestic nuclear energy, despite Australia having some of the largest uranium deposits in the world.***** 😂😂😂**But talk is all they can do, thanks to the Howard era legislation that bans nuclear development in Australia for power generation** DID YOU KNOW THAT 🤪

@awc900

11 күн бұрын

Labor is too cowardly to remove the ban aren't they?

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

HOWARD ? IS THAT YOUR REFERENCE ? FFS. THE LIBLAB HACK WHO HELPED DISARM AUSTRALIANS IN PREPARATION FOR AGENDA 21 ? GET A CLUE, DH. THE GREENS USED TO DEMAND NUCLEAR ENERGY FOR AUSTRALIA,, THEN NUCLEAR BECAME ECONOMICALLY VIABLE SO THE GREENS HAD TO FIND ANOTHER NON ISSUE TO CRY ABOUT.

Of course everything claimed by an advocate of the nuclear power lobby would be absolutely true.

@hughheeney3554

11 күн бұрын

Common sense tells you, if you are capable of thinking about it, that nuclear is the only answer, unless you want to use gas or coal.

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

hahahahaaaa!! typically weak projection there. everything she said can be verified, unlike anything said by your jet-setting, coal-exporting alp greens climate warriors

The foundations were well planned by outside countries years ago to get nuclear power in Australia for one reason they want accessibility to our uranium. It's coming and it will be controlled by China. China is building 150 nuclear plants in the next ten years at a rate of 4 years to build from ground up each plant. The Australian government being manipulated with aligning with Energy companies with Australian names but Chinese owned power suppliers who want Australian Uranium and its right under our noses . Heritage nsw needs to ask itself about who they protect its not the true custodians and knowledge holders of country .

No Nuclear Power plant in Australia = No risk of Nuclear failure in Australia

@tomjones5338

11 күн бұрын

Speak for yourself ur outnumbered by 98% of the Australian population wants nuclear power

@oldnutta7611

11 күн бұрын

Let me guess you'd rather a hydrogen plant.

@HellHound.933

11 күн бұрын

How many have died due to nuclear failure. I'll give you a hint. NONE. 😆

@joshuapraeger534

11 күн бұрын

Too late! There is one in Sydney, has been for decades

@ZELJKO472

11 күн бұрын

They will still be arguing about power in 50 years. By then power will be rationed and u will only be able to use it at certain times.

BUILD ME A SMALL REACTOR IN MY BACK YARD PLEASE

Heard of Fukushima? Nuke plants should be far away in some safe desolate place…

@450tank

11 күн бұрын

Caused by earthquake and tsunami. Systems at the plant detected the earthquake and automatically shut down the reactors. Emergency diesel generators turned on to keep coolant pumping around the cores, which remain incredibly hot even after shutdown. Soon after, a 14 metre high wave hit Fukushima. The water overwhelmed the defensive sea wall, flooding the plant and knocking out the emergency generators.

@sanjayvallabh

11 күн бұрын

Australia is geologically the most stable continent- don’t believe me, ask any geologist

@ilguitaro

11 күн бұрын

That's like saying don't fly coz airplanes crash. Nuclear power has an excellent safety record.....better than airplanes!

@450tank

11 күн бұрын

Caused by Tsunami. Systems at the plant detected the earthquake and automatically shut down the reactors. Emergency diesel generators turned on to keep coolant pumping around the cores. Soon after, a 14m wave hit Fukushima. The water breached the defensive wall, flooding the plant and knocking out the emergency generators.

@joshuapraeger534

11 күн бұрын

Look at the deaths from installing solar panels vs nuclear disasters and nuclear is way safer.

Build one in my backyard, will apply for a job too 👍👍

NUCLEAR ADVOCATE SAYS NUCLEAR BETTER AND SHE'D LOVE ONE IN HER BACKYARD 🤔 ****Buy One Get One Free This Weekend Only***

@merlinite-

11 күн бұрын

Australia's known uranium resources are the world's largest - almost one-third of the world total. In 2022 Australia produced 4820 tonnes of U3O8 (4087 tU). In 2022 it was the world's fourth ranking producer, producing 8% of global uranium. All Australia's uranium production is exported.17 Aug 2023

@merlinite-

11 күн бұрын

How do I put it on a level you could possibly understand Cheap electric prices 😂good high cost pipe dream wind and unreliable solar BAD

@dominicpelle7841

11 күн бұрын

@@merlinite- Not according to the CSIRO & AEMO and they are independent

@HellHound.933

11 күн бұрын

​@@dominicpelle7841 Independent are they CSIRO is an Australian Government corporate entity with a Board that sets the strategic direction of the Organisation and an Executive Team, led by the Chief Executive that leads, directs, coordinates and controls our operations. The majority of CSIRO's funding for GISERA comes from government - the Australian Government and the Governments of New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia and the Northern Territory. INDEPENDENT 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

@joshuapraeger534

11 күн бұрын

Based on nuclear plants lasting 30 years.. when they last 3 times that!

That's probably what they said at Chernobyl and Fukushima

@450tank

11 күн бұрын

Do some research on what caused those incidents. Technology has advanced since Chernobyl to prevent meltdowns. Fukushima was caused by a tsunami, flooding emergency generators that were used to cool reactor cores when the plant detected an earthquake and shut down the reactors.

@dmarshall8366

11 күн бұрын

@@450tank You would not care how much evidence was produced. Sadly for you it's a multi billion dollar pipe dream.

@dmarshall8366

11 күн бұрын

@@450tank only $8.3 billion to build

@positivepawpaw7564

11 күн бұрын

DO SOME HOMEWORK. YOUR GREEN LEFT PROPAGANDA DOESNT WORK HERE.

@dmarshall8366

11 күн бұрын

@@positivepawpaw7564 Go away hard right village idiot. Do you get irony when you push your own propaganda? Probably not, too stupid.