Hubert Bray, "The Schulze Method", 2018
Schulze Method, Social Choice, Voting Theory, Condorcet Voting, Margin of Victory Matrix, Pairwise Matchups, Chains between Candidates, Strengths of Chains, Independence of Clones, Monotonicity
Schulze Method, Social Choice, Voting Theory, Condorcet Voting, Margin of Victory Matrix, Pairwise Matchups, Chains between Candidates, Strengths of Chains, Independence of Clones, Monotonicity
Пікірлер: 7
What I don't understand is why there is no consideration of the rank levels in this calculation... it sounds weird not to account how much each candidate is in each order and cross to balance the result
Thank you. Didn’t find your preferred voting system video to ‘"ranked pairs", could you recommend one?
@markusschulze2362
2 жыл бұрын
The video on Tideman's ranked pairs method is here: services.math.duke.edu/~bray/Videos/1.15%20-%20Ranked%20Pairs%20-%2020180806-Coursera.mp4
@samhugo5870
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!! Watched it right away, now I see the difference. I wonder why more NGO or Organization seemed to use the Schulze Method instead, according to the German Wikipedia. Maybe it’s more common in Europe or the Danger of a trooping out Last Place Alternative is not so present in their Topics the Vote on. Also i Wonder can you determine a second winner, with this two methods? In some circumstances this might be useful.
@samhugo5870
2 жыл бұрын
Watched both a second time. They seemed to use the same numbers, but with Schulze D wins, with Ranked B wins, how can this be possible ?! Did I miss something? If not what does this difference mean? Why are there different winner, and what does this mean political?
@MusikCassette
Жыл бұрын
@@samhugo5870 there is no condorcet winner in the example. So why would you expect two different methods to produce the same winner?
Does the actual Markus Schulze run this channel or are you just a fan?