Dr Whites debates is what led me out of the Jehovah’s Witness beliefs. 🙏🏽

@JaNoah19

Жыл бұрын

Praise God! Celebrating you rn bro!

@daviddaniel2198

Жыл бұрын

@@JaNoah19 thank you all praises to the Lord 🙏🏽

@whatsactuallygoingonhere7230

Жыл бұрын

Praise God!

@bradleyjones3391

Жыл бұрын

God is so good 😭

@kellyanne7225

Жыл бұрын

I’m so glad! ❤

Thank God to all of the Catholic and Orthodox monks who painstakingly copied The Holy Bible by hand for 1,400 years so that we could read it today.

@ronaldsmall8847

2 ай бұрын

The ones who hid the Bible from the world and burned anyone at the stake who translated it to their own language?

@n9wff

2 ай бұрын

Which manuscripts?

@o.o.2255

Ай бұрын

All of them

@n9wff

Ай бұрын

@@o.o.2255 The Catholics were in Alexandria, Egypt, where agnosticism reigned? Did they transcribe the Codex Sinaiticus, which disagreed with the Codex Vaticanus no less than 8000 times? As NASA might hear: Houston, we have a problem.

@o.o.2255

Ай бұрын

@@n9wff First off, there is no problem. 1) You mean “Gnosticism?” OR “Agnostics?” Your headline narrative implies false assumptions. I’ll explain. Catholicism IS and WAS the only Christian Way of converting people, most of the bishops, priests and Christians (before 400 AD and BEFORE there was a Holy Bible of 73 books) were tortured AND killed (martyred) for the beliefs we Catholics still hold today and Protestants heretically reject, almost all 30K+ denominations, each as their own pope differently interpreting the scriptures. You should thank the Catholic church for defending the faith (1 Tim 3:15) who preserved and died for Christ and His one church. Irenaues of Lyons, Ignatius, Justin Martyr, and many others including Councils debated and considered these “Gnostics” heretics because many of their so-called “Special Knowledge” Was never taught by the apostles and these so-called hidden writings were somehow only given to them. Catholics fought these ideas. Bottom line, whether you meant Gnostics or Agnostics, Catholics were the only ones Evangelizing in Alexandria Egypt. Today, the Coptic Catholics are of the same spirit - belief unto death. Recently there were 21 Coptic Christians (Catholics) who were beheaded on a beach by Muslims. (In history, protestants hated Catholics so much, they sided with the muslims)… dont take my word for it, look it up. 2) Codex Sianiticus. Ahh yes, you must FIRST read church history BEFORE trying to call out the Catholics who were inspired by the Holy Spirit to recognize the 73 books of the bible we all enjoy today. And AFTER the 4 centuries of mortal persecutions to preserve Orthodox teachings when there was no new testament available to everyone and risked their lives to preserve and disseminate those writings to each under penalty of death. The bible is a Catholic book. A little church history below in case you were ignorant. I was like you, too and vehemently anti-Catholic UNTIL the Holy Spirit taught me these things, of which now I am sharing with you. 2a) In 367 AD, After Catholic Council of Nicaea, Bishop of Alexandria, Athanasius in his 39th (of 45 annual festal or Easter letters) recognized for the first time, 27 books of the New Testament 2b) In 382 AD, Pope Damasus for the first time decrees a single Holy Bible should be created. Thousands of manuscripts and Letters (remember, these all had to be Collected from everywhere) and adjudicated as either Accepted, Rejected, or “Uncertain.” The litmus test used was 3-fold: 2bi) Did an apostle or successor to apostle write these? 2bii) these writings ever read in the underground church in the previous 400 years?, and 2biii) Did the writings align with the Orthodox teachings passed down from apostle to apostle to apostle (Deacons, Bishops, and Elders)? If so, they were admitted as part of the 73 books of the canon. 3) The Old Testament was fairly easy to admit. All 46 books derived from the Greek Septuagint established by Jewish Greek Scribes in 250 BC decreed by King Ptolemy. All 72 scribes were separated by the King And when they finished, all 72 copies in the Library of Alexandria showed them to be nearly exactly the same. Talk about Holy Spirit Inspired. 3a) The Septuagint was the OT bible used by Paul and the apostles and in Acts 17:11 by the Bereans who all spoke Greek. 3b) The 4 Great Codices INCLUDING Codex Sianticus included those 7 Deuterocanon books which were removed from Protestant bibles in the 1880s by the British and Foreign Bible Society because it was too expensive to print AND these were converting Protestants to Catholics. THEN the Gideons widely disseminated these chopped up Protestant bibles in hotels, hospitals, schools, and prisons eluding to the historically ignorant, that Catholics added 7 books. That’s a recent lie in just past 100 years. 4) Finally, in 382, 397 & 416 at the Councils of Hippo and Cathage, respectively, the CATHOLIC CHURCH guided by the Holy Spirit determined the 73 books of the bible (46 OT and 27 NT). 4a) St Jerome, who spoke Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, and Latin translated the deluge of manuscripts into one language, Latin, which was the Language of the world at the time (Greek before that and English in modern world today) into the FIRST Complete OT/NT Holy Bible, the Latin Vulgate. THEN, it was translated into the English called the Douay Rheims. 4b) The Codex Sianaticus was NOT discovered until the 19th century and therefore UNAVAILABLE to the Catholic church in the 4th Century when our Catholic monks (scribes) were painstakingly “handwriting” (no printing presses were available yet) The cost for just one complete bible then was equivalent to one full year’s salary today. They were EXPENSIVE but could have been more but the monks were not working for Money, they were working for God so they were almost free labor. So NO, we do not have a problem, Houston. We have church history facts demonstrating the infallible Bible is a Catholic book developed by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit through Christ’s one church that He established in Matthew 16:18. Today, modern Catholic and Protestant bibles rely on several sources, including the 4 Great Codices and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Bibles are translated into 3 major categories: 4ai) Word for Word 4aii) Idea for Idea 4aiii) Phrase for Phrase I hope this helps with some if your ignorance (and many other protestants - I was one of them for nearly 30 years until just a few years ago.) So pray about who has changed and who has always been the same. Who preserved the faith and continued Orthodox teachings in early history, even unto torture and death. It was Christ’s true and single church, the Catholic church 2,000+ years ago. Protestantism began in mid 1500s and only 500 years old. IF ITS TRUE, IT’S PROBABLY NOT NEW, IF ITS NEW, ITS PROBABLY NOT TRUE

I cried when I heard him talk about our easy access to the whole word of God, and the men that gave their lives to protect the readers. Please think on these things my friends. God bless

@primepossum6997

Жыл бұрын

To think there are more Bibles in my own house than entire communities had between them - the truth found a way hallelujah!!!

@robertmize327

Жыл бұрын

Thank you

@jesusisking9035

Жыл бұрын

What he doesnt tell you is the text that those men died for isnt the one you have in your new versions. Your new versions come from the very people who killed those men.

@gerrydean7696

Жыл бұрын

​@@jesusisking9035 KJV only cult.

@jesusisking9035

Жыл бұрын

@@gerrydean7696 you seem keen on keeping your catholic alexandrian gnostic text

What a privilege to have the very Word of God so readily available. Today I'm thankful for those from days past that God used to preserve it. Thank you for this message.

@GodlessGubment

Жыл бұрын

Were you paying attention at all? There can be no very word of God under this system.

@briendoyle4680

Жыл бұрын

men's words... haha

@mcars100

Жыл бұрын

The Catholic Church preserved the word of god that’s a fact Luther took out 7 books and changed doctrine so if you are a denominations you can be certain you haven’t got the preserved word of god based on a truth of reality.

@mcars100

Жыл бұрын

@JosephBelloo Thanks for your opinion now I will give you truth Jesus Christ gave his authority to peter to build his church the bible was put together by the Catholic Church in the 3rd century Christianity didn’t change till the 16th century when a Catholic priest Martin Luther stripped down the bible and created traditions of men(denominations) the rapture is a false 19th century doctrine not based on scripture and divided even amongst the denominations.If you want to follow and understand Christ join his church the one,holy,apostolic Catholic Church

@mcars100

Жыл бұрын

@JosephBelloo Just checked them out sounds interesting but the truth is you broke from Christ’s authoritive church and judging by you saying rapture your making up your own interpretation that tells me your faith is just another denomination outside the Catholic Church

I thank God for my Roman Catholic friend who invited me to my first ever debate with Dr. White and Tim Staples on Sola Scriptura. Ever since then I have followed Dr. White's ministry. God has used him tremendously in my life.

@rinihogewoning6528

Жыл бұрын

Amen and keep praying for your Catholic friend too.

@srich7503

Жыл бұрын

@@rinihogewoning6528 thank you! And we will pray for you as well.

@johnsosa9584

Жыл бұрын

Check out the debate with Dr. White and Patrick Madrid(Catholic) on sola scriptura.

@johnyang1420

Жыл бұрын

Heard the same devate….folloeed Tim Staples ever since

@johnyang1420

Жыл бұрын

Jesus started Catholic church

I want to thank James White for making me a stronger Catholic Christian, as he places his own fallible interpretations above Holy Scripture, the same Scripture that came way after The Church authority was already established! Did Christians in the early Church reading Paul's letter to the Church of Laodicea, know it was not Holy Scripture? Why did many early Church Fathers disagree with each other on what books were to be included in the new testament? Peace always in Jesus Christ our Great and Kind God and Savior, He whose Flesh is true food and Blood true drink

It was by apostolic Tradition that the Church discerned which writings were to be included in the list of the sacred books. This complete list is called the Canon of Scripture. It includes 46 books for the Old Testament and 27 for the New Testament.

@saboabbas123

9 ай бұрын

There are no original "autographs", historical inaccuracies abound, translation inaccuracies are blatant (Greek from Hebrew), several books of the NT are forgeries, scribes changed various passages through the years and there are many "gospels" and Gnostic writings extant that were not included in the canon. I noticed Dr. White didn't discuss any of this nor did he discuss any writings prior to the 3rd century AD.

@PastorwithoutaPulpit

8 ай бұрын

The reason I believe in the God of the Bible, the inerrancy of Scripture and that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. We have a reliable collection of historical documents written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. They report super natural events that took place in fulfilment of specific prophecies and claim that their writings are via divine inspiration and not from men alone. The super natural events are important in that they show the divine nature of God. Jesus Christ cast out demons, healed the sick, blind, deaf, dumb and paralyzed, walked on water, fed thousands with little, and was resurrected all of which have eyewitness accounts. The feedings alone were witnessed by the thousands He fed on the two separate occasions that we are told of in the Gospels. John tells us that there were many more miracles than what are recorded in the Bible/Gospels and that it would have filled volumes of books upon books were he to have written them all down and that it would have taken more than one lifetime to do so. The claim that men wrote the Bible so it can not be true means that no other book ever written should be believed, no matter the topic as they're all written by man. The Bible is not just a book it is a collection of books written over a period of thousands of years of which all those books are linked together by One Divine Author. In this collection of books there are over 40 authors but only one Devine Author who links them all together via the Holy Spirit. Those authors wrote down His inspired Word given to them by God. 66 Volumes/Books in the Bible. The bulk of the New Testament was written over a period of around 50 years. It was in 49 AD to 53 AD when the Scripture writings of the New Testament are thought to have begun. With the last living Apostle John dying in 100 AD. Over a period of around 1500 years it was preserved and passed on: In 3 Languages On 3 Continents There are 66,360+ source documents that have been found for the entire Bible of which there are 24,360 and counting source documents for the New Testament alone. 5,839 in the original Greek, some 2 million pages 18,524 translations of that Greek into other languages Some of the oldest sources date to 125AD which is within decades of the completion of all the books that were canonized as the New Testament. The New Testament cannon, (Gospels of the Apostles/writings, Epistles/letters to the early Churches, all sources and eyewitness accounts that were to be included), was decided at the Synod of Carthage in 397 AD. Those asking for "Scientific Proof" about the Bible are either ignorant or asking with evil intent. An intelligent person knows that the scientific method can not be applied to verify the Bible. Scientific Method is: 1) Has to be observable. 2) Has to be measurable. 3) Has to be repeatable. Therefore no history can ever be proven via scientific method. You must use the historical method based on: Eyewitnesses accounts. Documents from the time or as close as possible. Make sure the story is corroborated by as many sources as possible. Look for anyone/anything that attempted to prove any of it false in that time period or as close to it as possible. Did anyone successfully prove any of it untrue? If they had/have why is there no record found anywhere of it ever being disproven? Luke = Historian A man of science, a physician, an educated and logical man who researched and gathered the accounts of eyewitnesses. He recorded the actual eyewitness accounts of our Lord and Savior, those who had heard Him speak and were present/saw the signs/miracles He performed. He did this because the life of those eyewitnesses were coming to an end due to age and he was inspired to write them down via the Holy Spirit before they could be lost or perverted by time. John = Evangelist John is organized around 7 specific events/signs/miracles all seen by eyewitnesses and corroborated by many. So he also provides proof of accuracy/truth. Mark = The shortest of the Gospels and is very direct or "Just the Facts" if you like. Mathew = Was written to the Jewish audience and that's one of the reasons for the extensive genealogy of Christ. There are also more references to the Old Testament in his gospel compared to the others. Peter = He lays out all the proof for the Bible and it's accuracy in 1 Peter Chapter 1. He makes the arguments that justify it all as truly what happened and that it all happened as recorded in the Gospels, the entire Bible. All of the Apostles were eyewitnesses of Jesus and/or of the resurrected Christ. Including Paul whom Jesus came to as he was on the road traveling to Damascus to persecute more Christians. This would have been the resurrected Christ or a form of Him that came from Heaven. There were at least 300 eyewitnesses still alive when Corinthians was written who could have disputed it but no one did. Mathias became the 12th Apostles after Judas hung himself so the argument of there not being 12 Apostles comes from ignorance or evil intent. There have been over 25,000 archeological digs in which there has been absolutely no evidence found that proves anything in the entire Bible false but in those digs many things have been found that prove it true. Other cultures and non believer's historical documents show or corroborate people, places, wars and many things that are in the Bible. Yet none of them prove any of it to be false but they do strengthen it. Word for Word Translations prove just how accurate what we have is when you consider there's no way anyone could have falsified any of it, be it via intent or mistakes. Many church fathers in history have made extensive notes that include scripture throughout the centuries and no matter the time or place all those references to scripture corroborate each other. Which shows just how accurate translations have been throughout time and still are as long as they maintain a word for word ideology during the translation. To falsify any of it they would have to change every single source, do it in three languages, on three continents, over a span of thousands of years, with no one catching any of it, no one ever talking about what they'd done, leaving behind no traces that they'd done it. Not to mention they'd have to steal all of those sources to change them, changing them would be a massive undertaking considering they were hand written in those times and then put them back without ever being seen or caught during the entire process. My last statement is this: Simply put the Bible can defend itself like a lion just let it loose. (Use Scripture to defend Scripture because it is a collection of eyewitness accounts that has been proven true again and again). There's a very good movie titled "The God Who Speaks" that covers much of what I've said above. If you still have doubt I would recommend you watch it and even if you don't because it was very well made and presented. Take care and God Bless.

@coachp12b

8 ай бұрын

Yeah I wonder who it was who was copying the texts throughout the first 3 centuries. It wasn’t Protestants

@everythingdefensivecarry1108

8 ай бұрын

Actually it’s 81 total books.

@PastorwithoutaPulpit

8 ай бұрын

@@everythingdefensivecarry1108 Umm No, the Cannon was ratified in Carthage 397 AD. So according to that council and church fathers there are only 66 books included in the Bible. They reached that determination after years of debate. The reason the "lost books" weren't included in the cannon was due to there being to hard to prove, to many variations existing that were supposed to be authentic, authorship, or divine inspiration ie far to many errors in them to be inspired by the Holy Spirit. Look into church history and you will find the details of what I'm letting you know. Take care and God Bless.

I am so grateful for all the faithful men who have gone before and for those to come. Thank you Lord!

@teresarabe8516

Жыл бұрын

AMEN!!! 🙌

@gothicissues5897

Жыл бұрын

Amen I am one of them

It's not juat how versed he is that amazes me, its how he is wel articulated and has sense of humour too...I'm glad God gave the world people like Dr. White.

@davidbradberry7637

9 ай бұрын

You would learn more Truth from Tovia Singer!!!

Thank you Catholic Church for the putting the Bible together for us !!!

To the one reading this, remember that in every circumstance, God is your constant companion. He leads your way, stands by your side, and watches over you. Take confidence in the knowledge that God is present in your life. Amen 🙏💖🌟

What a legend. I predict James will go down as a giant of the faith.

@timkhan3238

3 ай бұрын

lol, Dr. James White is a profound example of wasted energy in terms of Bible battle. He is a very miserable individual because he FAILED BIG TIME to annihilate KJV onlyism as he enthusiastically predicted it in his prime, full of vigor, and with a determined confidence. He lost the battle and his hair. KJV continues to thrive in the 21st century throughout the world, one proof that indeed it's the PURE, PRECISE, and PERFECT words of God. And all modern bibles are defective, deceitful, and fake bibles.

@Lightning77305

3 ай бұрын

@@timkhan3238 Perfect comment, that guy loves all mistranslations and hates the Word of God.

God bless you Dr James White

Its bizarre how underrated Dr. White is.

@tonybasoni8443

Жыл бұрын

MR,....Yes, he is a fantastic speaker.

@Nolongeraslave

Жыл бұрын

True servants of God are rarely recognized. But their work lives on.

Excellent video and overview of the history and some of the challenges of the beautiful revealed word of God!

Thank you to the individuals and leaders within the Catholic Church for dying to protect and preserve God's written word.

@gregorybezanson

Жыл бұрын

The Bible was not to be translated from the Latin. Until the 1960's only priests could read the Bible on local churches. Till then the Catholic church in the West condemned the men who translated the Bible into English. The men like Tyndale and others were hung or else burned at the stake.

@daddydaycareky

Жыл бұрын

@gregorybezanson this is completely false. There was a small period in history when lay people were not permitted to read certain translations of the Bible, and some translations have been ordered to be burned at different times. But this does not mean the Bible was only in Latin or people were never permitted to read the Bible on their ow. It is also very important to remember that prior to the invention of the printing press, Bibles were handwritten with painstaking care, usually by monks. Pages were adorned with artwork and covered with gold leaf. Each Bible was devoutly respected and cared for and read daily to the faithful Catholics. These Bibles were as priceless as the words of eternal life written within these works of art. Latin was not a way to keep the Bible from people. Rather, it was the best way to efficiently reproduce Bibles by hand and have it be understood by the greatest number of people around the world. Additionally, most people that could read, read Latin. This was the language of science, literature, government and religion for centuries. Far from keeping written Bibles from people, we have examples where the church went to great lengths to bring the written word to non-latin speaking cultures. Ufilas, a Catholic Bishop in the 4th century, worked with Germanic tribes in Europe to create a Written language, and taught many of them to read, so that they could have a written account of the Gospels and pass the Good News on for generations. This trend of Catholic missionaries creating written languages for ethnic groups in order to provide them a written gospel was not a single isolated event either. Ethnic Groups in Russia and Armenia owe written Gospels to Catholic missionaries. Although the invention of the printing press greatly reduced cost in comparison to earlier hand written copies, they were still worth several thousand dollars (in today’s money), and still not accessible to the common man. Scholars that have studied the Gutenberg Bible and its history add that "It is assumed that most were sold to monasteries, universities and particularly wealthy individuals" (Kapr, Albert (1996). Johann Gutenberg: The Man and His Invention)." Nonetheless, there was still demand for the printed word of God. Therefore, the Church approved of 200+ Vulgate Bibles to be printed. In fact, these were the first books to be printed on Gutenberg's printing press. Furthermore, these Catholic Bibles were in such high demand that they were all sold before they could even be completed. Many of these early Bibles were allowed to be carefully translated and printed in the various languages of Catholic Europe. The Douay-Rheims, an English translation of the Bible, was printed and approved for sale prior to the first King James version. These newly printed Bibles in varius local languages received high praise. Pope Pius II publicly supported the translations and distribution of the Bibles in various languages. History simply does not support these silly lies you have been told.

@jdizle1178

Жыл бұрын

So the individuals that weren’t catholic don’t get a thanks? Lol …

@daddydaycareky

Жыл бұрын

@@jdizle1178 not sure of any that helped preserve Scripture in its entirety. I will thank Protestants today for their love of their Scripture and willingness to share Scripture.

@palermotrapani9067

Жыл бұрын

@@gregorybezanson Who said it was not to be translated into Latin? In the NT itself on the Crucifix the NT itself speaks of 3 languages, Hebrew, Latin and Greek (John 19:19-20). Tyndale was not killed because he translated the Bible into English, it was that his translation was full of errors. Even after King Henry the VIII broke from Rome, he condemned Tyndale's translation and ordered it should be be used for the services in the Protestant church of England (Anglicans).

Thanks, Brothers

Thank you, thank you.

I'm grateful for the SG-1 reference Dr. White.

So Good and sharing this!! Thank Youuu!! 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 Starting the “making sense of manuscripts” now! Exciting!!

I really like James white. Going to be spending a lot of hours listening to hin!

@martinkent333

Жыл бұрын

Brainwashing by professionally trained Christian hustlers is so cool. Hebrew myths are the only ancient myths that are real? How educated are you, Stupid? Type Bible Criticism online and find out.

Glad I tuned in!! 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿✝️🙏🏼🇬🇧

Thank you Father for your Word allday Everyday

Excellent. What a blessing.

Thank God for this.

@AERONOOB

6 ай бұрын

You are welcome my child

He was one of the guys who I followed when i became Christian. I didn't necessarily leave islam to be Christian, i started believing in evolution theory...but that in between phase was terrible because I had so many questions... And this guys put ot so plainly to someone like me who had all this nonsensical arguments, having come from islam. 🎉 I am so grateful for your work Dr White. Thank you.

God bless James White.

In the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible, the Book of Hebrews provides a well-known definition of faith in Hebrews 11:1: "Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." This verse emphasizes the concept that faith involves a confident assurance or trust in things that are hoped for but not necessarily seen or proven. It underscores the element of conviction and assurance in religious belief.

Thank you God for my Bible. SGD!

Enjoyed this talk so much. Thank you so much for posting! God Bless

Yes we have access to so much information now..how blessed we are today

Thank you for this.

Peace in Christ! 🕎✝️🕊️

45:21 Right on Dr. White! Yes it means something. Thank you Dr. White and G3 for this informative and engaging post! 😊🙋‍♂Blessings!

Excellent, thank you

I enjoy listening to James in relaxed mode. 😏 Just a jab, he’s been faithful and I respect that so much. Dr James or Mr White. 👍

Very good theology and history!

Perfect timing. I'm talking about this tomorrow night with a church group.

What good timing for this

This was so much information I feel like I need to watch it several times to retain it.

Dr white is amazing. Equally smart as he is funny

Praise Jesus

May God Bless Dr. White. My prayer is to get an ESV Study Bible. Please join me in prayer for it. -Blessings from Tajji in Tanzania (Christian missionary)

@bennettburris3446

11 ай бұрын

Praying

@JoseSalloum

10 ай бұрын

The ESV makes the LORD Jesus a lair check John 7: 8-10, check Col 1:14 there is no blood. God bless you, sister.

@Benjamin-fu5ij

9 ай бұрын

@@JoseSalloum Sister Tajji, please don't listen to these people. They like to spread lies to promote their propaganda of King James Onlyism. They believe the King James is the only authorized version that should be considered the word of God. This is laughable false, and there are many debates online that show this plainly. I made the switch from NKJV to ESV a few years back and haven't looked back since. Still love the KJV and NKJV for it's beauty of language, but accuracy to the original is a wholly different story. Don't let people like this confuse you. God bless!

@zabaleta66

9 ай бұрын

Get the Authorized Version (KJV).

@PastorwithoutaPulpit

8 ай бұрын

You must know that God our Father and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, that although He hates the sin, He loves the sinner. If they will just come to Him and repent in their heart of hearts of all their sins, and proclaim Him as their Savior, their Lord, the Son of GOD. The reason I believe in the God of the Bible, the inerrancy of Scripture and that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. We have a reliable collection of historical documents written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. They report super natural events that took place in fulfilment of specific prophecies and claim that their writings are via divine inspiration and not from men alone. The super natural events are important in that they show the divine nature of God. Jesus Christ cast out demons, healed the sick, blind, deaf, dumb and paralyzed, walked on water, fed thousands with little, and was resurrected all of which have eyewitness accounts. The feedings alone were witnessed by the thousands He fed on the two separate occasions that we are told of in the Gospels. John tells us that there were many more miracles than what are recorded in the Bible/Gospels and that it would have filled volumes of books upon books were he to have written them all down and that it would have taken more than one lifetime to do so. The claim that men wrote the Bible so it can not be true means that no other book ever written should be believed, no matter the topic as they're all written by man. The Bible is not just a book it is a collection of books written over a period of thousands of years of which all those books are linked together by One Divine Author. In this collection of books there are over 40 authors but only one Devine Author who links them all together via the Holy Spirit. Those authors wrote down His inspired Word given to them by God. 66 Volumes/Books in the Bible. The bulk of the New Testament was written over a period of around 50 years. It was in 49 AD to 53 AD when the Scripture writings of the New Testament are thought to have begun. With the last living Apostle John dying in 100 AD. Over a period of around 1500 years it was preserved and passed on: In 3 Languages On 3 Continents There are 66,360+ source documents that have been found for the entire Bible of which there are 24,360 and counting source documents for the New Testament alone. 5,839 in the original Greek, some 2 million pages 18,524 translations of that Greek into other languages Some of the oldest sources date to 125AD which is within decades of the completion of all the books that were canonized as the New Testament. The New Testament cannon, (Gospels of the Apostles/writings, Epistles/letters to the early Churches, all sources and eyewitness accounts that were to be included), was decided at the Synod of Carthage in 397 AD. Those asking for "Scientific Proof" about the Bible are either ignorant or asking with evil intent. An intelligent person knows that the scientific method can not be applied to verify the Bible. Scientific Method is: 1) Has to be observable. 2) Has to be measurable. 3) Has to be repeatable. Therefore no history can ever be proven via scientific method. You must use the historical method based on: Eyewitnesses accounts. Documents from the time or as close as possible. Make sure the story is corroborated by as many sources as possible. Look for anyone/anything that attempted to prove any of it false in that time period or as close to it as possible. Did anyone successfully prove any of it untrue? If they had/have why is there no record found anywhere of it ever being disproven? Luke = Historian A man of science, a physician, an educated and logical man who researched and gathered the accounts of eyewitnesses. He recorded the actual eyewitness accounts of our Lord and Savior, those who had heard Him speak and saw some of the many signs/miracles He performed. He did this because the life of those eyewitnesses were coming to an end and he was inspired to write them down via the Holy Spirit before they could be lost or perverted by time. John = Evangelist John is organized around 7 specific events/signs/miracles all seen by eyewitnesses and corroborated by many. So he also provides proof of accuracy/truth. Mark = The shortest of the Gospels and is very direct or "Just the Facts" if you like. Mathew = Was written to the Jewish audience and that's one of the reasons for the extensive genealogy of Christ. There are also more than a few references to the Old Testament in his gospels. Peter = He lays out all the proof for the Bible and it's accuracy in 1 Peter Chapter 1. He makes the arguments that justify it all as truly what happened and that it all happened as recorded in the Gospels, the entire Bible. All of the Apostles were eyewitnesses of Jesus and/or of the resurrected Christ. Including Paul whom Jesus came to as he was on the road traveling to Damascus to persecute more Christians. This would have been the resurrected Christ or a form of Him that came from Heaven. There were at least 300 eyewitnesses still alive when Corinthians was written who could have disputed it but no one did. Mathias became the 12th Apostles after Judas hung himself so the argument of there not being 12 Apostles comes from ignorance or evil intent. There have been over 25,000 archeological digs in which there has been absolutely no evidence found that proves anything in the entire Bible false but in those digs many things have been found that prove it true. Other cultures and non believer's historical documents show or corroborate people, places, wars and many things that are in the Bible. Yet none of them prove any of it to be false but they do strengthen it. Word for Word Translations prove just how accurate what we have is when you consider there's no way anyone could have falsified any of it, be it via intent or mistakes. Many church fathers in history have made extensive notes that include scripture throughout the centuries and no matter the time or place all those references to scripture corroborate each other. Which shows just how accurate translations have been throughout time and still are as long as they maintain a word for word ideology during the translation. To falsify any of it they would have to change every single source, do it in three languages, on three continents, over a span of thousands of years, with no one catching any of it, no one ever talking about what they'd done, leaving behind no traces that they'd done it. Not to mention they'd have to steal all of those sources to change them, changing them would be a massive undertaking considering they were hand written in those times and then put them back without ever being seen or caught during the entire process. My last statement is this: Simply put the Bible can defend itself like a lion just let it loose. (Use Scripture to defend Scripture because it is a collection of eyewitness accounts that has been proven true again and again). There's a very good movie titled "The God Who Speaks" that covers much of what I've said above. If you still have doubt I would recommend you watch it and even if you don't because it was very well made and presented. Take care and God Bless.@@JoseSalloum

My favorite historians to listen to are James White and Robert Godfrey (Ligonier, Westminster Escondido). They both love to tell the story of the past and do a good job of keeping the listener engaged.

Absolutely fantastic! Many thanks for sharing this!

Sometimes I take this information for granted because we’ve heard it over and over, but I forget sometimes that there are new Christians being brought to Christ every day. The Living God is sovereign and beautiful.

Very helpful thankyou

I just heard from Barnabas Aid about a man who prayed for 65 years to get a Bible. He has now read it cover to cover 5 times.

@saintejeannedarc9460

10 ай бұрын

That is incredible. We are so blessed in the countries where we can get them so easily and affordably.

I so wanted to know about this topic. Thank you so much. God's Word endures forever.

James White...In full form...educator, scholar,Debater, living treasure for believers

We need more men like Dr. White! This is pure gold for your ears!

@revalationrevaltion9291

4 ай бұрын

Your sick in the head.

These men of old were amazing

Dr White is a boss. Casually carries around a book worth more than my car.

@FatherSonSpirit1

Жыл бұрын

Noticed your profile pic, can you please explain it ?

@PracticalBibleStudies

11 ай бұрын

@@FatherSonSpirit1 Sure. I do translations and commentary of ancient non-canonical and gnostic texts from a Reformed Christian perspective.

@yacobshelelshaddai4543

4 ай бұрын

Most things are worth more than my car lol

That line about the fossilized scroll being a copy of the Jerusalem Post, that killed me. LOL😂

Yeah, we take the Word of God for granite. I had to say thank you Lord for the freedom I have to read the Word when and where I want. God is Holy and Gracious to us All!

@Whatisthematterwithyoupeople

7 ай бұрын

Granite…lol. He is the rock after all. 😂

priceless info

Very good and helpful presentation. Thank you for this break out session.

Thank you, Sir! This is a great issue that pretty much of us as Christians could fail to answer. I am really grateful for the sermon.

@michaelschwartz99

Жыл бұрын

The writers of the Bible. The Catholic Church has the fullness of the Truth

This video is worth watching !

Great video

brilliant presentation James. God bless you. I agree with you totally >>> we are headed into some really dark times filled with lots of lost people who have been deceived and it's happening very very quickly. But thanks be to God for He is the one who keeps us and keeps His Word.

having listened to the Dividing Line for years, it’s enjoyable to watch Dr. White in action, can he talk when he gets going !

The sovereignty and grace of God Almighty to give us His Word and to preserve it throughout time for the blessing of His people.

@QuestionThingsUseLogic

2 ай бұрын

The bible: edited, redacted, added into...all by ruling royalty to keep us slaves.

Thank God for the Catholic church compiling the bible!

@andrewnunez7894

Жыл бұрын

That’s what you got out of this? Lol, he tells a story about one of the guys having to dedicate the translation so he doesn’t get burned.

@michaelquintana1098

Жыл бұрын

Ya but he said the catholic guy questioned the catholic churches position ? So he wasn't ok with them as a catholic..

All you critics, say what you will about him, but Dr. James White is RIGHT when he says that we MUST! LEARN! HOW! WE! GOT! OUR! BIBLES! _And then teach it to our children and grandchildren._

@QuestionThingsUseLogic

Жыл бұрын

Yes, Rome gave you your bible. Arrius Piso and his family members wrote the entire NT plus Esther and Josephus. He called himself the ALPHA and OMEGA as his name starts with A for Alpha and ends with O for Omega. His relative, Flavius Titus, called himself the son of man.

@dylanfreeman9160

Жыл бұрын

@@QuestionThingsUseLogic bro you need to take off your tin foil hat. Thats not even close to true lmao

@QuestionThingsUseLogic

Жыл бұрын

@@dylanfreeman9160 you need to say that to the historical scholars who have researched this. And I'm talking *serious* historical scholars. Historians no longer spend much time discussing Abraham or Moses, on the grounds that they are clearly mythical. To give one example, K. L. Noll just says in Canaan and Israel in Antiquity: A Textbook on History and Religion, “Abraham and Moses are fictitious characters”. "I’ll start with what most historians believe regarding Moses, because if Moses did not exist and the Israelites were never sojourned in Egypt, the link is broken and Abraham, by default never really existed. After two hundred years of searching and never finding a scrap of evidence that the Israelite people fled from Egypt in a great biblical Exodus, nearly all historians now say the Exodus never occurred-Israelites were local Canaanite people and the Exodus story was just a foundation myth. There is no evidence for any of the events surrounding the purported Exodus from Egypt and therefore no evidence that the biblical Moses ever existed." Maybe you need to take off *your* tin foil hat and face some actual facts.

@michaelrameriz2723

Жыл бұрын

Got mine from God...😊

@jayden-jsjincorporated5089

2 ай бұрын

@@QuestionThingsUseLogicthe exodus can still be true without any “evidence”. if we had proof then that would mean for certain that it happened, if we don’t (besides the written text) then that does NOT mean it didn’t happen. it means that it could have, or couldn’t have and we have to look further to make that decision based on other things. there are many historical events that don’t have “evidence” of them happening but we believe them because they were written about

MASTERLY 👏🏼

The human heart and the human brain each have their own memories.

The quality of this video is so pristine

@EricBadong

Жыл бұрын

Audio's not too good, though.

@RUFUS777

Жыл бұрын

Audio has many problem places

@whoathatsanicememe3093

Жыл бұрын

Sounds like someone is stapling papers. I was listening and not watching and it reminded me of one of my college professors who would talk and staple all class long. Good times.

@mikepruett1745

Жыл бұрын

@@EricBadong no bass

I would love to be there live for one of his lectures or sermons. One of my favorites.

"But you, Daniel, shut up the words and seal the book, until the time of the end. Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase.”"

I very much enjoyed this. Lots of great information. I'm saving this to my e-Sword and I'm sharing it to my social media. Bravo Zulu and kudos. All that said, and without taking anything away from it, I really wish he would have answered the question that is the subject of the video. Because, not only would I have liked to have heard the the culminating conclusion, but I'm fairly certain I'm going to get asked that question when I share it.

@PastorwithoutaPulpit

8 ай бұрын

You must know that God our Father and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, that although He hates the sin, He loves the sinner. If they will just come to Him and repent in their heart of hearts of all their sins, and proclaim Him as their Savior, their Lord, the Son of GOD. The reason I believe in the God of the Bible, the inerrancy of Scripture and that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. We have a reliable collection of historical documents written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. They report super natural events that took place in fulfilment of specific prophecies and claim that their writings are via divine inspiration and not from men alone. The super natural events are important in that they show the divine nature of God. Jesus Christ cast out demons, healed the sick, blind, deaf, dumb and paralyzed, walked on water, fed thousands with little, and was resurrected all of which have eyewitness accounts. The feedings alone were witnessed by the thousands He fed on the two separate occasions that we are told of in the Gospels. John tells us that there were many more miracles than what are recorded in the Bible/Gospels and that it would have filled volumes of books upon books were he to have written them all down and that it would have taken more than one lifetime to do so. The claim that men wrote the Bible so it can not be true means that no other book ever written should be believed, no matter the topic as they're all written by man. The Bible is not just a book it is a collection of books written over a period of thousands of years of which all those books are linked together by One Divine Author. In this collection of books there are over 40 authors but only one Devine Author who links them all together via the Holy Spirit. Those authors wrote down His inspired Word given to them by God. 66 Volumes/Books in the Bible. The bulk of the New Testament was written over a period of around 50 years. It was in 49 AD to 53 AD when the Scripture writings of the New Testament are thought to have begun. With the last living Apostle John dying in 100 AD. Over a period of around 1500 years it was preserved and passed on: In 3 Languages On 3 Continents There are 66,360+ source documents that have been found for the entire Bible of which there are 24,360 and counting source documents for the New Testament alone. 5,839 in the original Greek, some 2 million pages 18,524 translations of that Greek into other languages Some of the oldest sources date to 125AD which is within decades of the completion of all the books that were canonized as the New Testament. The New Testament cannon, (Gospels of the Apostles/writings, Epistles/letters to the early Churches, all sources and eyewitness accounts that were to be included), was decided at the Synod of Carthage in 397 AD. Those asking for "Scientific Proof" about the Bible are either ignorant or asking with evil intent. An intelligent person knows that the scientific method can not be applied to verify the Bible. Scientific Method is: 1) Has to be observable. 2) Has to be measurable. 3) Has to be repeatable. Therefore no history can ever be proven via scientific method. You must use the historical method based on: Eyewitnesses accounts. Documents from the time or as close as possible. Make sure the story is corroborated by as many sources as possible. Look for anyone/anything that attempted to prove any of it false in that time period or as close to it as possible. Did anyone successfully prove any of it untrue? If they had/have why is there no record found anywhere of it ever being disproven? Luke = Historian A man of science, a physician, an educated and logical man who researched and gathered the accounts of eyewitnesses. He recorded the actual eyewitness accounts of our Lord and Savior, those who had heard Him speak and were present/saw the signs/miracles He performed. He did this because the life of those eyewitnesses were coming to an end due to age and he was inspired to write them down via the Holy Spirit before they could be lost or perverted by time. John = Evangelist John is organized around 7 specific events/signs/miracles all seen by eyewitnesses and corroborated by many. So he also provides proof of accuracy/truth. Mark = The shortest of the Gospels and is very direct or "Just the Facts" if you like. Mathew = Was written to the Jewish audience and that's one of the reasons for the extensive genealogy of Christ. There are also more references to the Old Testament in his gospel compared to the others. Peter = He lays out all the proof for the Bible and it's accuracy in 1 Peter Chapter 1. He makes the arguments that justify it all as truly what happened and that it all happened as recorded in the Gospels, the entire Bible. All of the Apostles were eyewitnesses of Jesus and/or of the resurrected Christ. Including Paul whom Jesus came to as he was on the road traveling to Damascus to persecute more Christians. This would have been the resurrected Christ or a form of Him that came from Heaven. There were at least 300 eyewitnesses still alive when Corinthians was written who could have disputed it but no one did. Mathias became the 12th Apostles after Judas hung himself so the argument of there not being 12 Apostles comes from ignorance or evil intent. There have been over 25,000 archeological digs in which there has been absolutely no evidence found that proves anything in the entire Bible false but in those digs many things have been found that prove it true. Other cultures and non believer's historical documents show or corroborate people, places, wars and many things that are in the Bible. Yet none of them prove any of it to be false but they do strengthen it. Word for Word Translations prove just how accurate what we have is when you consider there's no way anyone could have falsified any of it, be it via intent or mistakes. Many church fathers in history have made extensive notes that include scripture throughout the centuries and no matter the time or place all those references to scripture corroborate each other. Which shows just how accurate translations have been throughout time and still are as long as they maintain a word for word ideology during the translation. To falsify any of it they would have to change every single source, do it in three languages, on three continents, over a span of thousands of years, with no one catching any of it, no one ever talking about what they'd done, leaving behind no traces that they'd done it. Not to mention they'd have to steal all of those sources to change them, changing them would be a massive undertaking considering they were hand written in those times and then put them back without ever being seen or caught during the entire process. My last statement is this: Simply put the Bible can defend itself like a lion just let it loose. (Use Scripture to defend Scripture because it is a collection of eyewitness accounts that has been proven true again and again). There's a very good movie titled "The God Who Speaks" that covers much of what I've said above. If you still have doubt I would recommend you watch it and even if you don't because it was very well made and presented. Take care and God Bless.

Outstanding presentation!

thank you for this!

That was so interesting. I have always been curious about the legacy of our God’s Word and I agree we all need to know how to answer the skeptics. A great point James White made was referring to Homer and the Iliad and the length of time between the first replication. Great to watch! May God forgive us all for taking Him out of the USA and take his judgement off of us before it does get very dark for us. Pray Pray Pray❤❤❤

The Coverdale Bible 1535, is the oldest English translation Bible, at least the Psalter, the Lord’s Prayer, and some verses, which are still read and sung in worship to this day.

The Catholic Church was authority that declared the canon of scripture. The canon was debated until the end of the 4th century and the first writing that had the whole canon as we know it today is from the early 4th century.

@ManlyServant

10 ай бұрын

not protestant canon,so go away,talk about YOUR canon somewhere

@pio1483

9 ай бұрын

@@ManlyServant “go talk about the true canon elsewhere, we enjoy ours which is missing books!” lol

@PastorwithoutaPulpit

8 ай бұрын

You must know that God our Father and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, that although He hates the sin, He loves the sinner. If they will just come to Him and repent in their heart of hearts of all their sins, and proclaim Him as their Savior, their Lord, the Son of GOD. The reason I believe in the God of the Bible, the inerrancy of Scripture and that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. We have a reliable collection of historical documents written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. They report super natural events that took place in fulfilment of specific prophecies and claim that their writings are via divine inspiration and not from men alone. The super natural events are important in that they show the divine nature of God. Jesus Christ cast out demons, healed the sick, blind, deaf, dumb and paralyzed, walked on water, fed thousands with little, and was resurrected all of which have eyewitness accounts. The feedings alone were witnessed by the thousands He fed on the two separate occasions that we are told of in the Gospels. John tells us that there were many more miracles than what are recorded in the Bible/Gospels and that it would have filled volumes of books upon books were he to have written them all down and that it would have taken more than one lifetime to do so. The claim that men wrote the Bible so it can not be true means that no other book ever written should be believed, no matter the topic as they're all written by man. The Bible is not just a book it is a collection of books written over a period of thousands of years of which all those books are linked together by One Divine Author. In this collection of books there are over 40 authors but only one Devine Author who links them all together via the Holy Spirit. Those authors wrote down His inspired Word given to them by God. 66 Volumes/Books in the Bible. The bulk of the New Testament was written over a period of around 50 years. It was in 49 AD to 53 AD when the Scripture writings of the New Testament are thought to have begun. With the last living Apostle John dying in 100 AD. Over a period of around 1500 years it was preserved and passed on: In 3 Languages On 3 Continents There are 66,360+ source documents that have been found for the entire Bible of which there are 24,360 and counting source documents for the New Testament alone. 5,839 in the original Greek, some 2 million pages 18,524 translations of that Greek into other languages Some of the oldest sources date to 125AD which is within decades of the completion of all the books that were canonized as the New Testament. The New Testament cannon, (Gospels of the Apostles/writings, Epistles/letters to the early Churches, all sources and eyewitness accounts that were to be included), was decided at the Synod of Carthage in 397 AD. Those asking for "Scientific Proof" about the Bible are either ignorant or asking with evil intent. An intelligent person knows that the scientific method can not be applied to verify the Bible. Scientific Method is: 1) Has to be observable. 2) Has to be measurable. 3) Has to be repeatable. Therefore no history can ever be proven via scientific method. You must use the historical method based on: Eyewitnesses accounts. Documents from the time or as close as possible. Make sure the story is corroborated by as many sources as possible. Look for anyone/anything that attempted to prove any of it false in that time period or as close to it as possible. Did anyone successfully prove any of it untrue? If they had/have why is there no record found anywhere of it ever being disproven? Luke = Historian A man of science, a physician, an educated and logical man who researched and gathered the accounts of eyewitnesses. He recorded the actual eyewitness accounts of our Lord and Savior, those who had heard Him speak and were present/saw the signs/miracles He performed. He did this because the life of those eyewitnesses were coming to an end due to age and he was inspired to write them down via the Holy Spirit before they could be lost or perverted by time. John = Evangelist John is organized around 7 specific events/signs/miracles all seen by eyewitnesses and corroborated by many. So he also provides proof of accuracy/truth. Mark = The shortest of the Gospels and is very direct or "Just the Facts" if you like. Mathew = Was written to the Jewish audience and that's one of the reasons for the extensive genealogy of Christ. There are also more references to the Old Testament in his gospel compared to the others. Peter = He lays out all the proof for the Bible and it's accuracy in 1 Peter Chapter 1. He makes the arguments that justify it all as truly what happened and that it all happened as recorded in the Gospels, the entire Bible. All of the Apostles were eyewitnesses of Jesus and/or of the resurrected Christ. Including Paul whom Jesus came to as he was on the road traveling to Damascus to persecute more Christians. This would have been the resurrected Christ or a form of Him that came from Heaven. There were at least 300 eyewitnesses still alive when Corinthians was written who could have disputed it but no one did. Mathias became the 12th Apostles after Judas hung himself so the argument of there not being 12 Apostles comes from ignorance or evil intent. There have been over 25,000 archeological digs in which there has been absolutely no evidence found that proves anything in the entire Bible false but in those digs many things have been found that prove it true. Other cultures and non believer's historical documents show or corroborate people, places, wars and many things that are in the Bible. Yet none of them prove any of it to be false but they do strengthen it. Word for Word Translations prove just how accurate what we have is when you consider there's no way anyone could have falsified any of it, be it via intent or mistakes. Many church fathers in history have made extensive notes that include scripture throughout the centuries and no matter the time or place all those references to scripture corroborate each other. Which shows just how accurate translations have been throughout time and still are as long as they maintain a word for word ideology during the translation. To falsify any of it they would have to change every single source, do it in three languages, on three continents, over a span of thousands of years, with no one catching any of it, no one ever talking about what they'd done, leaving behind no traces that they'd done it. Not to mention they'd have to steal all of those sources to change them, changing them would be a massive undertaking considering they were hand written in those times and then put them back without ever being seen or caught during the entire process. My last statement is this: Simply put the Bible can defend itself like a lion just let it loose. (Use Scripture to defend Scripture because it is a collection of eyewitness accounts that has been proven true again and again). There's a very good movie titled "The God Who Speaks" that covers much of what I've said above. If you still have doubt I would recommend you watch it and even if you don't because it was very well made and presented. Take care and God Bless.

@MikeM-cz5ln

2 ай бұрын

You aren't allowed to reveal that truth here.

@IG88AAA

2 ай бұрын

@@ManlyServant How do you know your canon?

Thank God we have James White.

@AstariahFox

Жыл бұрын

He does satans work not Gods work

@HearGodsWord

Жыл бұрын

@@AstariahFox easy to accuse without proof I suppose. Pretty sure the Bible is against such actions.

@AstariahFox

Жыл бұрын

@@HearGodsWord trinity is the biggest deception. Christendom have influenced many killings of people who denied the trinity It's all about power and control over people They had jesus killed cause he spoke out against there traditions and hypocrisy in his day and it's still going on today in Christendom At one point in history it meant death to those who taught against the trinity Christendom is evil and works for satan . He has Christendom under his control It's all gonna be destroyed Jehovah is gonna destroy Babylon the great which represents world empire of false religion Hes giving us a warning to flee from it

@cantrait7311

Жыл бұрын

@@HearGodsWord he’s a heretic Represents Another American man made “religion “

@AVKingJamesBible

Жыл бұрын

@@HearGodsWord not sure about him “doing satans work” but he is definitely deceived as are so many. The many corrupt modern translation “bibles” are a huge part of the problem. It actually blows my mind that people don’t see a problem with almost 200 different versions of the Bible in English alone. Stick with The King James and you will have God’s preserved Bible.

I encourage everyone to look into all the books which the dead sea scrolls attest to

GREATNESS.

Did he talk about how the canon of Scripture was created? Who said what books are inspired and which ones dont belong in the bible? I feel like thats an important point. Did I miss it?

@PastorwithoutaPulpit

8 ай бұрын

You must know that God our Father and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, that although He hates the sin, He loves the sinner. If they will just come to Him and repent in their heart of hearts of all their sins, and proclaim Him as their Savior, their Lord, the Son of GOD. The reason I believe in the God of the Bible, the inerrancy of Scripture and that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. We have a reliable collection of historical documents written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. They report super natural events that took place in fulfilment of specific prophecies and claim that their writings are via divine inspiration and not from men alone. The super natural events are important in that they show the divine nature of God. Jesus Christ cast out demons, healed the sick, blind, deaf, dumb and paralyzed, walked on water, fed thousands with little, and was resurrected all of which have eyewitness accounts. The feedings alone were witnessed by the thousands He fed on the two separate occasions that we are told of in the Gospels. John tells us that there were many more miracles than what are recorded in the Bible/Gospels and that it would have filled volumes of books upon books were he to have written them all down and that it would have taken more than one lifetime to do so. The claim that men wrote the Bible so it can not be true means that no other book ever written should be believed, no matter the topic as they're all written by man. The Bible is not just a book it is a collection of books written over a period of thousands of years of which all those books are linked together by One Divine Author. In this collection of books there are over 40 authors but only one Devine Author who links them all together via the Holy Spirit. Those authors wrote down His inspired Word given to them by God. 66 Volumes/Books in the Bible. The bulk of the New Testament was written over a period of around 50 years. It was in 49 AD to 53 AD when the Scripture writings of the New Testament are thought to have begun. With the last living Apostle John dying in 100 AD. Over a period of around 1500 years it was preserved and passed on: In 3 Languages On 3 Continents There are 66,360+ source documents that have been found for the entire Bible of which there are 24,360 and counting source documents for the New Testament alone. 5,839 in the original Greek, some 2 million pages 18,524 translations of that Greek into other languages Some of the oldest sources date to 125AD which is within decades of the completion of all the books that were canonized as the New Testament. The New Testament cannon, (Gospels of the Apostles/writings, Epistles/letters to the early Churches, all sources and eyewitness accounts that were to be included), was decided at the Synod of Carthage in 397 AD. Those asking for "Scientific Proof" about the Bible are either ignorant or asking with evil intent. An intelligent person knows that the scientific method can not be applied to verify the Bible. Scientific Method is: 1) Has to be observable. 2) Has to be measurable. 3) Has to be repeatable. Therefore no history can ever be proven via scientific method. You must use the historical method based on: Eyewitnesses accounts. Documents from the time or as close as possible. Make sure the story is corroborated by as many sources as possible. Look for anyone/anything that attempted to prove any of it false in that time period or as close to it as possible. Did anyone successfully prove any of it untrue? If they had/have why is there no record found anywhere of it ever being disproven? Luke = Historian A man of science, a physician, an educated and logical man who researched and gathered the accounts of eyewitnesses. He recorded the actual eyewitness accounts of our Lord and Savior, those who had heard Him speak and were present/saw the signs/miracles He performed. He did this because the life of those eyewitnesses were coming to an end due to age and he was inspired to write them down via the Holy Spirit before they could be lost or perverted by time. John = Evangelist John is organized around 7 specific events/signs/miracles all seen by eyewitnesses and corroborated by many. So he also provides proof of accuracy/truth. Mark = The shortest of the Gospels and is very direct or "Just the Facts" if you like. Mathew = Was written to the Jewish audience and that's one of the reasons for the extensive genealogy of Christ. There are also more references to the Old Testament in his gospel compared to the others. Peter = He lays out all the proof for the Bible and it's accuracy in 1 Peter Chapter 1. He makes the arguments that justify it all as truly what happened and that it all happened as recorded in the Gospels, the entire Bible. All of the Apostles were eyewitnesses of Jesus and/or of the resurrected Christ. Including Paul whom Jesus came to as he was on the road traveling to Damascus to persecute more Christians. This would have been the resurrected Christ or a form of Him that came from Heaven. There were at least 300 eyewitnesses still alive when Corinthians was written who could have disputed it but no one did. Mathias became the 12th Apostles after Judas hung himself so the argument of there not being 12 Apostles comes from ignorance or evil intent. There have been over 25,000 archeological digs in which there has been absolutely no evidence found that proves anything in the entire Bible false but in those digs many things have been found that prove it true. Other cultures and non believer's historical documents show or corroborate people, places, wars and many things that are in the Bible. Yet none of them prove any of it to be false but they do strengthen it. Word for Word Translations prove just how accurate what we have is when you consider there's no way anyone could have falsified any of it, be it via intent or mistakes. Many church fathers in history have made extensive notes that include scripture throughout the centuries and no matter the time or place all those references to scripture corroborate each other. Which shows just how accurate translations have been throughout time and still are as long as they maintain a word for word ideology during the translation. To falsify any of it they would have to change every single source, do it in three languages, on three continents, over a span of thousands of years, with no one catching any of it, no one ever talking about what they'd done, leaving behind no traces that they'd done it. Not to mention they'd have to steal all of those sources to change them, changing them would be a massive undertaking considering they were hand written in those times and then put them back without ever being seen or caught during the entire process. My last statement is this: Simply put the Bible can defend itself like a lion just let it loose. (Use Scripture to defend Scripture because it is a collection of eyewitness accounts that has been proven true again and again). There's a very good movie titled "The God Who Speaks" that covers much of what I've said above. If you still have doubt I would recommend you watch it and even if you don't because it was very well made and presented. Take care and God Bless.

@MikeM-cz5ln

2 ай бұрын

If he did that he would have to admit the canon of the Bible came from the Catholic Church.

Thank God for the universal church (Catholic church ) for putting together the world of God through the Holy Spirit

@Juno_Beach

10 ай бұрын

you mean the reformers

@PatrickInCayman

9 ай бұрын

@@Juno_Beach No, they corrupted it

@Juno_Beach

9 ай бұрын

@@PatrickInCayman just catch up on your reading from post Catholic Luther and Augustine , you know, fathers of the Protestant movement . If not for the reformers Protestants exposing Roman Catholicism Europe would still be in the dark ages . Basic Church History

@pio1483

9 ай бұрын

@@Juno_Beachabsolutely not. You may have your faulty opinions about the righteousness of the Catholics or the Protestant Deformers, but it’s plainly historical and silly to deny that the Catholic Church compiled Sacred Scripture and defined the canon.

@markbell2663

8 ай бұрын

@pio5119 Mystery Babylon is only a mystery to those who drink of her cup.

Loysville, PA! I've been there, that is a small village!

Man, that close 🥹

My husband, best friend and I were honored to be at G3 DC-2022 and look forward to Atlanta 2023! ♥️ Dr James White was an amazing presenter!✝️🙏🏻

@GodlessGubment

Жыл бұрын

Relax Helen

We got our bible via The Catholic Church praise God.

Great talk very informative and uplifting!

I'm an atheist but this was brilliant, so much so that i'll be watching it again at least a couple of times.

We need a movie series of the story of the Bible manuscripts!

@daddydaycareky

Жыл бұрын

It would be far too Catholic for many

@cindiloowhoo1166

11 ай бұрын

@@daddydaycareky Well, The Catholics put the Bible together. Tis History.

@daddydaycareky

11 ай бұрын

@@cindiloowhoo1166 agreed. I think many people would be shocked to learn this fact.

@saintejeannedarc9460

10 ай бұрын

Is there anything else you'd like to be smug and proud of?

@seanhillery1231

5 ай бұрын

A Lamp in the Dark by Christian Pinto.

Im muslim but i highly respect this man. I know he beleives is he telling the truth and is self-honest

@sweatt4237

Жыл бұрын

Why is Jesus appearing to your Muslim brothers in dreams?

@PastorwithoutaPulpit

8 ай бұрын

You must know that God our Father and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, that although He hates the sin, He loves the sinner. If they will just come to Him and repent in their heart of hearts of all their sins, and proclaim Him as their Savior, their Lord, the Son of GOD. The reason I believe in the God of the Bible, the inerrancy of Scripture and that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. We have a reliable collection of historical documents written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. They report super natural events that took place in fulfilment of specific prophecies and claim that their writings are via divine inspiration and not from men alone. The super natural events are important in that they show the divine nature of God. Jesus Christ cast out demons, healed the sick, blind, deaf, dumb and paralyzed, walked on water, fed thousands with little, and was resurrected all of which have eyewitness accounts. The feedings alone were witnessed by the thousands He fed on the two separate occasions that we are told of in the Gospels. John tells us that there were many more miracles than what are recorded in the Bible/Gospels and that it would have filled volumes of books upon books were he to have written them all down and that it would have taken more than one lifetime to do so. The claim that men wrote the Bible so it can not be true means that no other book ever written should be believed, no matter the topic as they're all written by man. The Bible is not just a book it is a collection of books written over a period of thousands of years of which all those books are linked together by One Divine Author. In this collection of books there are over 40 authors but only one Devine Author who links them all together via the Holy Spirit. Those authors wrote down His inspired Word given to them by God. 66 Volumes/Books in the Bible. The bulk of the New Testament was written over a period of around 50 years. It was in 49 AD to 53 AD when the Scripture writings of the New Testament are thought to have begun. With the last living Apostle John dying in 100 AD. Over a period of around 1500 years it was preserved and passed on: In 3 Languages On 3 Continents There are 66,360+ source documents that have been found for the entire Bible of which there are 24,360 and counting source documents for the New Testament alone. 5,839 in the original Greek, some 2 million pages 18,524 translations of that Greek into other languages Some of the oldest sources date to 125AD which is within decades of the completion of all the books that were canonized as the New Testament. The New Testament cannon, (Gospels of the Apostles/writings, Epistles/letters to the early Churches, all sources and eyewitness accounts that were to be included), was decided at the Synod of Carthage in 397 AD. Those asking for "Scientific Proof" about the Bible are either ignorant or asking with evil intent. An intelligent person knows that the scientific method can not be applied to verify the Bible. Scientific Method is: 1) Has to be observable. 2) Has to be measurable. 3) Has to be repeatable. Therefore no history can ever be proven via scientific method. You must use the historical method based on: Eyewitnesses accounts. Documents from the time or as close as possible. Make sure the story is corroborated by as many sources as possible. Look for anyone/anything that attempted to prove any of it false in that time period or as close to it as possible. Did anyone successfully prove any of it untrue? If they had/have why is there no record found anywhere of it ever being disproven? Luke = Historian A man of science, a physician, an educated and logical man who researched and gathered the accounts of eyewitnesses. He recorded the actual eyewitness accounts of our Lord and Savior, those who had heard Him speak and were present/saw the signs/miracles He performed. He did this because the life of those eyewitnesses were coming to an end due to age and he was inspired to write them down via the Holy Spirit before they could be lost or perverted by time. John = Evangelist John is organized around 7 specific events/signs/miracles all seen by eyewitnesses and corroborated by many. So he also provides proof of accuracy/truth. Mark = The shortest of the Gospels and is very direct or "Just the Facts" if you like. Mathew = Was written to the Jewish audience and that's one of the reasons for the extensive genealogy of Christ. There are also more references to the Old Testament in his gospel compared to the others. Peter = He lays out all the proof for the Bible and it's accuracy in 1 Peter Chapter 1. He makes the arguments that justify it all as truly what happened and that it all happened as recorded in the Gospels, the entire Bible. All of the Apostles were eyewitnesses of Jesus and/or of the resurrected Christ. Including Paul whom Jesus came to as he was on the road traveling to Damascus to persecute more Christians. This would have been the resurrected Christ or a form of Him that came from Heaven. There were at least 300 eyewitnesses still alive when Corinthians was written who could have disputed it but no one did. Mathias became the 12th Apostles after Judas hung himself so the argument of there not being 12 Apostles comes from ignorance or evil intent. There have been over 25,000 archeological digs in which there has been absolutely no evidence found that proves anything in the entire Bible false but in those digs many things have been found that prove it true. Other cultures and non believer's historical documents show or corroborate people, places, wars and many things that are in the Bible. Yet none of them prove any of it to be false but they do strengthen it. Word for Word Translations prove just how accurate what we have is when you consider there's no way anyone could have falsified any of it, be it via intent or mistakes. Many church fathers in history have made extensive notes that include scripture throughout the centuries and no matter the time or place all those references to scripture corroborate each other. Which shows just how accurate translations have been throughout time and still are as long as they maintain a word for word ideology during the translation. To falsify any of it they would have to change every single source, do it in three languages, on three continents, over a span of thousands of years, with no one catching any of it, no one ever talking about what they'd done, leaving behind no traces that they'd done it. Not to mention they'd have to steal all of those sources to change them, changing them would be a massive undertaking considering they were hand written in those times and then put them back without ever being seen or caught during the entire process. My last statement is this: Simply put the Bible can defend itself like a lion just let it loose. (Use Scripture to defend Scripture because it is a collection of eyewitness accounts that has been proven true again and again). There's a very good movie titled "The God Who Speaks" that covers much of what I've said above. If you still have doubt I would recommend you watch it and even if you don't because it was very well made and presented. Take care and God Bless.

The word happy comes from the word happen.

He is getting big now😮

Thank you my homeschool pod keeps asking this question … excited to translate what I learned into grade 3 friendly info

@manuelfarias6694

Жыл бұрын

good luck and God bless you sister!!

@whoathatsanicememe3093

Жыл бұрын

God bless you. You are teaching our future as you know and with the way things are going in public and even many private schools, they maybe the only well taught people around. Thank you for giving your time and energy to something so important.

What is amazing is seeing God's Sovereignty displayed in His selecting men to preserve His Word in spite of the hardships visited upon them by a vicious papacy determined to retain their power against the truth of the Gospel message.

@australopithecusafarensis5386

Жыл бұрын

The papacy is from Christ. Those men rebelled against God

@ralphowen3367

Жыл бұрын

The empower Diocetian also destroyed the scriptures--all that he could find-- in his realm.

@pio1483

9 ай бұрын

Lol. You can thank the Catholic Church for compiling the canon of Scripture under the guidance of the Holy Ghost. If not for His Church, you wouldn’t have the Bible at all, even the butchered translations of heresiarchs.

@markbell2663

8 ай бұрын

@pio5119 I think you meant to say “butchered heresiarchs” You know the ones that were dismembered and butchered on racks; the ones who had the Iron Maiden enclosed upon them; the ones written about in Fox’s Book of Martyrs and Martyrs Mirror. Some day you will get to meet them and you’ll see your whorish Mother’s dogma was not about truth but Satanic world domination. By the way, if the Lord has a bride, who is chaste and afflicted while sojourning in this world while being faithful to Him who gave Himself for her, who per say would be Satan’s bride? She who holds the cup and bag?

I disagree with Dr. White on Calvinism, but on Bible Transmission he's the guy!

I wish I could find this on Sermon Audio so I can listen to this while I’m at work welding!

@martinkent333

Жыл бұрын

Brainwashing is such fun!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No education, eh Rube?

Praise God for men of God like Dr. James White🙏 May Lord Jesus' abundant blessings be upon you. Thank you so very much.

@AstariahFox

Жыл бұрын

He supports apostasy.

@mikemccormick9667

Жыл бұрын

@@AstariahFox No he's not a believer of Roman Catholicism.

@AstariahFox

Жыл бұрын

@@mikemccormick9667 hes not even a Christian and a bible believer

@mikemccormick9667

Жыл бұрын

@@AstariahFox Why because he believes Calvinism?

@AstariahFox

Жыл бұрын

@@mikemccormick9667 no he doesn't believe the bible and what it actually teaches Same with all christendom. False religion will be destroyed

Does he have a book on this subject? I think it will be tremendously helpful if he publishes a book on this subject so that we can have all this information in one place

47:59 This thought on Tiktok is BRILLIANT!

@francislaguna9142

9 ай бұрын

If you are really a believer of Jesus. You will not vacate your faith for Jesus. Check and confirm your salvation, or else u r just in religion and yet think that you are a believer of Christ.

@adrianlayman892

9 ай бұрын

@@francislaguna9142 God Bless you and your family brother!

If Calvinism is true and EVERYTHING is ordained by God, then that is how we got the Bible; God's will.

Imagine knowing what this guy knows. Take a minute to understand what he knows… at any minute, this guy is down to debate the very nuances of biblical history, theology and biblical print history. That’s actually incredible.

@cjr4497

Жыл бұрын

He is a narcissist, a Calvinist, and a poor debater in general. He is a "Church of me" guy in direct defiance of the Bible. He also does a lot of misleading in this talk and he knows it.

@BoereworsRoll

Жыл бұрын

@@cjr4497 That is a big claim. What do you have to back that up? If you're going to go to the trouble of responding to my comment, surely you have some videos or previous experiences to share?

@punstir1292

Жыл бұрын

JW can claim this all he wants. At the end of the day there is one infallible voice for binding matters to the church and it isn’t him. JW deceives us and needs to resign his “job”. We all whether we like it or not, assume the Church Hierarchy gave us the canon, and if you don’t, you immediately imply that another watered down hierarchy did it

@saintejeannedarc9460

10 ай бұрын

@@BoereworsRoll People that don't like him, really don't like him. They are usually Catholics.

@Greg-n

9 ай бұрын

​@@BoereworsRollWatch his debate with Trent Horn on salvation and also give his debate with Patrick Madrid a listen. Come to your own conclusions