Thanks CTD!😊

Thank you, Ronald. Very interesting. Keep up the great Intel.

Very interesting and thought provoking.

This is why ilove being a staffer for CtD.

So if there is in fact plasticizer in the cover then it cant be a urethane. So then why call it that? In a previous video I believe the Pitch Black also shined up easily. I am sure Storm has either seen this/these videos or been told about them. Wonder what their reaction is.

@joehoenig7596

3 ай бұрын

there's a bigger question coming out of this video: if the storm IQ 78D is not in fact a true urethane ball because of the plasticizer that it contains then why did it need to be at 78 in the first place that hardness rule only applied to urethane balls on the PBA tourso if it's not a urethane bowl, honestly the 78D storm IQ is storms version of what the hammer NU is, and essentially it's the same thing-- if it's not urethane, it doesn't need to be that hard.🤷‍♂️

Interesting

It was a piece of cake to polish most poly urethane balls. There were a few that didn't want to shine easily. The original Blue Hammer and Ebonite Thunderbolt.

Thank you so much for this informative video. Please keep showing these types of videos they are very educational and informative for bowlers who want to add some useful skills and knowledge to their skills pool.

Back in the day. I do remember shinny urethane balls. For example, there was the shiny blue hammer or Columbia U2. Am I right about this?

My old Columbia 300 U-Dot came from the factory shined. Loved that ball. That's very interesting how they call their ball urethane. Good stuff Mr Hickland.

Cool video talk tech bowling ball

There goes more of plasticizer myth.