Final Exams and Video Playlists: www.video-tutor.net/

@prrithwirajbarman8389

4 ай бұрын

what software you are using ?

This video title makes me think of equations riding dirt bikes and doing other radical things

@armaansingh6047

4 ай бұрын

I did not expect this comment on a maths video 💀

@Dulsithorg

14 күн бұрын

Same💀​@@armaansingh6047

Best online tutor

@LucasP3ssoa

4 ай бұрын

I agree with you

Wow! I had no idea that the second problem could have 2 correct answers. I only expected one of them to be correct.

Professor Organic Chemistry Tutor, thank you for another outstanding Algebra video. Problem solving always helps College and High School students in Science and Engineering. This is an error free video/lecture on KZread TV with the Organic Chemistry Tutor.

The best. I really appreciate your help throughout my time in college 🙏🙏🙏

You slay every time! Thank you.

Agreed best tutor I have seen

My tutor of all time can you make a video about sketch curves, determining range and domain and transformation of curves 😢 I will really appreciate🙏🙏❤

Geniuos personified it is you gentleman

I appreciate you 👍🏽

nice

Why not substitution sqrt(x) = u and simply calculate the solution using the pq-formula? Seems much more straightforward.

I suck at math so I wonder why the hell is this recommended to me.

@Tarif2809

4 ай бұрын

Do you watch chemistry

i should have known it was a quadratic by the roots

Sewye befettereh geta ehen x root minaminhn atasayegn kmeche wedih new degmo werage selx ymiyaweraw arefeh kochohn billa enenm khelini jofehn ansa allah axawn yilakbhna

Can you pin me?

Call me stupid, but I don't understand part from 3:47 to 4:07. I'd appreciate if you'd explain.

@djsalty3799

4 ай бұрын

So both terms have (x - 32) in them: x*(x - 32) - 8*(x - 32) Therefore you can factor out (x -32) out of both terms, I personally find it easier to think about it as both terms being multiplied by (x - 32) as a whole and it’s the same equation if I undistributed it out of each term. So then you are leftover with (x - 8)*(x - 32), which gets you the same equation as before, if you try to multiply (x - 32) to both x and -8 with the distributive property I hope that makes sense I’m not the best at explaining things

@djsalty3799

4 ай бұрын

@@SlowSunsetVibesoops didn’t realize someone had beaten me to punch as I was writing my comment, my bad

@robertmayfield8746

4 ай бұрын

@@djsalty3799 No, I actually like your explanation, because now I understand it. That was the point. The missing part was this transformation (x - 8)*(x - 32), which now makes perfect sense. I greatly appreciate your comment.