If you would like to book a consultation with me you can do so here - www.reallifearchitecture.co.uk/online-services Please read the terms and conditions before you book.

Another good video Neil 👍 I have a long term client that is blind so I will produce a set of drawings for for his partner and a written explanation for him. This works for both me and the client but is very long winded. We use the main compass points to describe the what we're talking about so to avoid confusion and he is very good at taking the information and processing it. So I can whole heartedly confirm what you are saying drawings are better. Its the old adage a picture paints a 1000 words. In my case it maybe more 🤣.

@RealLifeArchitecture

Жыл бұрын

That is an unusual situation but it’s great to hear you taking this client on and helping them get the most from the design process.

Interesting breakdown. I find working with BIM software such as Revit and 3D rendering software like Escape is the easiest way to get design intentions across. and VR is a game changer also for clients to be able to walk around their new home before it is even built.

@RealLifeArchitecture

Жыл бұрын

Im sure that 3D software gives a big advantage, but it has two drawbacks; 1. It’s cost, both in terms of buying the kit and training, as well as the time spent to produce 3D drawings. Producing 2D is quicker. 2. Clients can react badly if the first think they see is a highly developed virtual design. I’ve found it best to gradually escalate. Start with the layout, get that approved, then work up to sections and elevations before moving on to 3D. I should also point out that, at least where I work, only very large projects use BIM. Small to medium projects (under £5M) almost never use BIM. That might change as more BIM using architects become self employed however.

@ottigreenisgo

Жыл бұрын

Producing and working with software like Revit and other 3d softwares is many times faster than 2D. If used properly it is not even a comparison due to everything updating on every view with every change etc. You do need to manage client expectations when showing 3D views and it’s best to show hidden live views with shadows to not distract them with too much info

@RealLifeArchitecture

Жыл бұрын

@@ottigreenisgo almost all my projects involve altering existing buildings. I tried Archicad a few years back, had used it as a student, it took twice as long as 2D and wasn’t worth it, in my opinion. I am going to a Revit introductory training session next month, will seriously consider this if I think it works for me. Am not dismissing 3D, I use Sketchup when necessary but I want something quick and efficient. Hyper detail gets in the way.

@ottigreenisgo

Жыл бұрын

Hit me up once you’ve started using revit. Don’t fall into the trap of using it like autoCAD and doing everything line based, I see it so often and it’s really sad. Learn to utilise view templates and the filters. Many of my drawings are automatically created based on specific filters etc. it saves a tonne of time and doesn’t come close to what the time spent using old school methods

@RealLifeArchitecture

Жыл бұрын

@@ottigreenisgo thank you, will do

Excellently explained. You may just make a great chartered architectural technologist one day.

@RealLifeArchitecture

Жыл бұрын

🤣

My first look at a project is 99% after the architect has warrant drawings and I’m there to price, I never look at the drawings when I’m in site, I just go and map out in my head how the place looks, take pics for details, then study the drawings once home(and kids are in bed😂) then usually do a follow up meeting with the clients asking about the finer details.

Great video, thanks! I completely agree on your points about writing vs drawings. My clients also struggle to visualise my designs (I'm a garden designer).I supply both 2D plans and a 3D fly-through, as I'm quick enough in SketchUp and Rendering/video editing to make it cost-effective. Sometimes though, clients still struggle to visualise the design and then I'm at a loss!

@RealLifeArchitecture

Жыл бұрын

I hear you. I find talking it through with clients works best. A good hour spent going over drawings often brings up issues they hadn’t realised.

we want to see mooooooooooooooooooooooore

@RealLifeArchitecture

Жыл бұрын

Thank you, I make one video per week.

what cool channle

@RealLifeArchitecture

Жыл бұрын

Thanks

1Chron.28 v.11-12 Then David gave his son Solomon the plans for the vestibule, its houses, its treasuries, its upper chambers, its inner chambers, and the place of the mercy seat; and the plans for all that he had by the Spirit, of the courts of the house of the LORD, of all the chambers all around, of the treasuries of the house of God, and of the treasuries for the dedicated things;

Brain lateralization as you are presenting it in the video is a pseudo-scientific myth, and while of course quiet can help with concentration it has nothing to do with the brain hemispheres and I would advise not to spread this myth that effectively promotes stereotyping "analytical" and "creative" people.

@RealLifeArchitecture

Жыл бұрын

Thabk you for your comment, I appreciate the insight. I am an architect and not an expert in neuroscience. The book I referenced in the video, drawing in the right side of the brain, was very useful to me and remains a must read for anyone learning to draw. It was written decades ago and I suspect neuroscience has moved on. That said I was not trying to promote stereotypes and I believe anyone can be both analytical and also creative.