How to Measure Your Exposure to Nuclear Radiation: The Better Geiger Radiation Detector

(This revised version corrects decimal errors in the Geiger counter dose rates. As it turns out, the new numbers further enhance the advantages of the S-1.)
At around $150, the Better Geiger S-1 is the most affordable scintillation detector available for monitoring the level of nuclear radiation (x-rays and gamma rays) in your environment and measuring your accumulated energy dose over time. It is a worthwhile investment in your safety and education. (Note: The S-1 is not a Radon monitor and cannot measure Radon concentrations.)
This video evaluates the performance of the S-1 against traditional Geiger counters, and reviews both its strengths and weaknesses. It also explains why a Geiger counter is not always the best choice for measuring radioactivity. For more details, see: www.bettergeiger.com
Disclaimer: I am not a paid sponsor for this product.
Interested in learning more? See my in-depth video, "Is Your Geiger Counter Lying to You? Understanding the Limitations of Your Geiger Counter" • Is Your Geiger Counter...

Пікірлер: 34

  • @dwodtli
    @dwodtli4 ай бұрын

    Best review of the S-1 I have seen!

  • @camresearch5120
    @camresearch51206 ай бұрын

    There is an without warranty ability to access the raw signals but it is not for non technical users. It allows you to add spectroscopy using an Arduino etc. There is a basic example online. I have an S-1 and I am Australian 🦘 and have nothing to do with the company. For a counter that is accurate and doesn't lie to you it's is IMHO the best dosimeter for money. There are many better just not for this little money.

  • @user-kk9tw3ks2p
    @user-kk9tw3ks2p8 ай бұрын

    If ingested, alpha sources are far more dangerous than beta or gamma sources.

  • @poopenshnapples7160
    @poopenshnapples71608 ай бұрын

    1:39 and 'Murica

  • @moonpaws1
    @moonpaws1 Жыл бұрын

    Thanks for the video. Is fallout debris mostly alpha and beta, or can it emit xray and gamma as well?

  • @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    Жыл бұрын

    Fallout has all three components as the various isotopes decay. But the x-rays and gamma rays are the most deadly. Shortly after a nuclear blast, the gamma radiation can be high enough to kill a person after less than one hour of exposure.

  • @karhukivi

    @karhukivi

    11 ай бұрын

    @@kinetoscopemicroproduction6418 A Geiger counter is no use at those levels, you need an ionisation detector for fallout as the civil defence would use.

  • @baronvonmaximillionsnell2757
    @baronvonmaximillionsnell2757 Жыл бұрын

    Can you recommend, a cheap Geiger counter for a hobby?

  • @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    Жыл бұрын

    The Better Geiger is my first recommendation in terms of bang for your buck. But if you have to have a Geiger counter, rather than a scintillation detector (e.g., to detect Beta), you might check out the ones below. I don't own any of these units, but they were recommended by others. www.amazon.com/stores/page/1E810C01-4BF1-4212-A67A-3C5EE4BCEFE2

  • @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    Жыл бұрын

    This one gets very mixed reviews. usa.banggood.com/FNIRSI-GC01-Geiger-Counter-Nuclear-Radiation-Tester-Professional-Marble-Radiation-Ionization-Personal-Dose-Alarm-Radioactive-Tester-p-1973818.html

  • @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    Жыл бұрын

    This one also came recommended. See the video comparisons below. www.amazon.com/Karlak-Radiation-Household-Radioactive-Vibrations/dp/B0BL2VGWH8/

  • @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    Жыл бұрын

    kzread.info/dash/bejne/X2iq16qAhNXRfbw.html

  • @fredericklegrande4564
    @fredericklegrande45649 ай бұрын

    Xcel Energy releasing

  • @vitcenek8611
    @vitcenek8611 Жыл бұрын

    Raysid or Radiacode 101 are better choice from my point of view. But this has really good price point at least 👍🏻

  • @AlChemicalLife

    @AlChemicalLife

    Жыл бұрын

    Why do you say that?

  • @sammiller6631

    @sammiller6631

    12 күн бұрын

    @@AlChemicalLife Because the Radiocode models can perform gamma spectroscopy, which can tell you what the isotope is, not just how much activity it is generating.

  • @peterwright4224
    @peterwright42245 ай бұрын

    The Radiacode 103 is far superior the device presented here is primitive

  • @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    5 ай бұрын

    The Radiacode is $120 more and requires more technical skill to use. The S-1 is an entry level unit. So the comparison is unfair. It may be "primitive," but that does not mean it's less accurate. For the technically inclined, there are internal ports for doing spectroscopy.

  • @sonyxperiasmk
    @sonyxperiasmk Жыл бұрын

    He should have paid you for this though

  • @davehimlin2374
    @davehimlin23743 ай бұрын

    These units that have a + or - 30% accuracy rating, seem to be unacceptable in a life or death scenario. In other words, lets say there is some type of major nuclear event in your location. Your unit may be registering 100 rads per hour when in reality the actual readings could be 70 rads per hour or 130 rads per hour . That is a major discrepancy especially when a person is trying to seek out safe shelter. I have no doubt, that our govt is using equipment with a much better accuracy rating but such equipment is not that accessible to society.

  • @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    3 ай бұрын

    There is much more accurate equipment but it comes at a price. One option is a refurbished and calibrated civil defense unit such as the CDV-715 ion chamber detector, made for higher levels of radiation. I had mine repaired and calibrated by KI4U. Since the circuit board had to be replaced, it cost me over $200. www.ki4u.com/

  • @davehimlin2374

    @davehimlin2374

    3 ай бұрын

    @@kinetoscopemicroproduction6418 Ty, but ive read even these CDV units, have a plus/minus accyracy rate of 20-30 % ? Also, it is suggested to get them recalibrated ever few years, even if they are not being used, since the tech in them is decades old. Recalibration costs around $120 ? Kinda expensive upkeep IMHO.

  • @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    3 ай бұрын

    Yep, every 5 yrs is recommended. Measuring radiation has a lot of variables. More accurate meters, used by professionals, cost thousands of dollars. That's why the Better Geiger is actually a pretty good deal considering its range (about 2R/hr). There used to be a Geiger based dosimeter that measured gamma up to 600R/hr at +/-20%. It was about $700 as I recall. nukalert.com/index_b.html

  • @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    3 ай бұрын

    BTW I do not recommend Geiger based dosimeters as I explain in my other video, Is Your Geiger Counter Lying to You?

  • @davehimlin2374
    @davehimlin2374 Жыл бұрын

    plus or minus 30% accuracy ? that doesnt sound very good, if ones life is at stake in knowing radioactive fallout levels in their area/ home, etc. ?

  • @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    @kinetoscopemicroproduction6418

    Жыл бұрын

    It's much better than a Geiger counter or a Geiger based dosimeter. If there are high levels of radiation, say 1000 mrem (10,000 microSieverts) per hour, 30% is probably not going to change your safety strategy.

  • @boonchonggoh9700
    @boonchonggoh97009 ай бұрын

    Your comment is biased, without any basis, against the so called authoritian countries. The only country that had used nuclear weapon againat another country is USA. The country that has waged the most number of wars against other countries since WWII is also US. As a scientist, you should have an objective mind.

  • @TheFrogfeeder

    @TheFrogfeeder

    8 ай бұрын

    🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • @jorgefurtado9037

    @jorgefurtado9037

    Ай бұрын

    Apparently the problem would be the fact that the USA uses it, if it were the communists or the Nazis you would applaud it.

  • @sammiller6631

    @sammiller6631

    12 күн бұрын

    Russia has a history of invading its neighbors for centuries, even before the US existed. Russia signs peace treaties like the 1774 Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca, then breaks them when they want more land, like Empress Catherine II did when she invaded the Crimean Khanate in 1783. Russia is the largest country in the world because of its centuries of aggressive imperialism. Russia has waged more wars than US. Whether the 1774 Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca or the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, Russia repeats the cycle of not honouring its word. At 1999 Istanbul summit, Russia promised to withdraw its military forces from Moldova and Georgia by 31 December 2002, which did not happen. The US left Afganistan, left Iraq, so when will Russia leave Georgia as they promised?