These videos are so helpful. Please keep up the great work.

This was perfect, thanks! G'day from Berlin.

Many thanks, answered my question perfectly!

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks, happy to help!

That is a fab tutorial! Clear explanations and the right level of details. I love RME gear but whenever I watch one of their tutorials I am confused. Perhaps cause they are doing tutorials for engineers, not for musicians or hifi aficionados 😂 Liked and subbed.

@SynthaxAudioUK

11 ай бұрын

Thanks, glad you found it useful. It's true the RME range is traditionally aimed at professional engineers, and as such there's often a certain level of knowledge that's expected. We like to try and break things down as much as we can though - everyone has to start somewhere!

Flawless presentation, great voice tone. In other words relaxing edutainment. One more thing: *SUBSCRIBED* of course. :)

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed the video and thanks for subscribing!

Looking for a replacement for my fireface 800 (don’t need all the channels and i have an external preamp). Would i go for something like the adi-2 pro fs, or is that overkill?

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

Hi Alex! The ADI-2 Pro FS R can work as a class-compliant 2-channel interface, and you'd obviously get the incredible quality of the unit, but yes it may be a bit overkill! As the ADI-2 Pro FS R works as a class-compliant interface, you don't get the benefit of Totalmix FX like you have with your 800. If you want a simple 2-channel recording device, I'd suggest the Babyface Pro FS or if you're looking for more features, the new Fireface UCX II is also a fantastic option!

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

@Kostya K. Hi and yes, the ADI-2 Pro FS R has 2 x line-level inputs. Since the purpose of a microphone preamp is to boost the signal up to line-level, you can connect any external preamp to the Pro's inputs for recording (most likely with female XLR to TRS cables).

RME is the best!

Thank you for the video, is it right that even at the same settings the da conversion is better with the adi than the ufx? I m thinking about getting the adi for monitoring and as a second ad for a recording daw. I really appreciate your explenation.

Are these converters superior to the new UFX III?

Hi Synthax Audio, thanks for the video. Im still getting my head around the functionality and benefits of using the ADI-2 Pro FS R or ADI-2 DAC or ADI-2 FS in combination with an audio interface (in my case the UCX 2). Im reading through the comments here, but one area is still not clear and am wondering if you clarify for me? Will the audio being recorded to the DAW be of higher quality if routed through the ADI-2 Pro or ADI-2 DAC FS or ADI-2 FS compared to the quality of my UCX 2? I understand the difference would be marginal but i am trying to better understand if there is an analogue to digital output after DA conversion. I would think this would be the case because of the marginally better converters in the ADI-2 Pro compared to the UCX 2 but i am uncertain about this because all i am seeing and hearing are comments that the reference for monitoring with headphones or monitors will be higher quality. Am i missing something? Do all of these 3 units convert back to digital as an available output which can be routed into what is recorded into the DAW? Also, I am trying to figure out which unit of the ADI-2 series will be best for my needs. Can i utilise the main headphone outputs on the ADI-2 as a second and 3rd live monitoring headphone mixes using routing? (While I am at the same time using a live monitoring headphone mix on the UCX-2?) Do any or all of the ADI-2 units offer this functionality? Thanks

@SynthaxAudioUK

Жыл бұрын

Hi and thanks for commenting, hopefully the following helps clarify things a bit; 1 - Will the audio being recorded to the DAW be of higher quality if routed through the ADI-2 Pro - Analogue audio sources recorded via the ADI-2 FS or Pro FS R's inputs will in theory be higher quality than the same source recorded through the UCX II, as the ADI-2 Series have slightly better A-D (and D-A) conversion. As you state the difference will be subtle though, as the UCX II already has very high quality inputs. Recording with the ADI-2 Series is really meant for a few specialist cases (namely mastering) - for the vast majority of studio recording applications, the UCX II is more than capable! Also if you're asking whether it's worth routing audio out of a DAW, then recording it back in via the ADI-2 FS or Pro's analogue inputs, purely to achieve a 'higher quality' signal, then no probably not. It's not a 'mojo box', and is designed to be transparent - you'd be better off looking at dedicated hardware or FX units that are designed to process audio (EQs / compressors / summing mixers etc). 2 - Do all of these 3 units convert back to digital as an available output which can be routed into what is recorded into the DAW? - Only the ADI-2 FS and ADI-2 Pro FS R have digital outputs. The DAC is essentially a D-A Converter only, i.e. it's designed for listening / playback only. It therefore has digital inputs, but not digital outputs (although it can pass audio from the SPDIF input to the USB connection). 3 - Can i utilise the main headphone outputs on the ADI-2 as a second and 3rd live monitoring headphone mixes using routing? - Yes, you can send audio from the UCX II to an ADI-2, then monitor via its headphone outputs. This can be the same as what you're monitoring via your UCX II, or something different... depends what submix you send to the ADI-2 (from TotalMix). Both headphone outputs on the ADI-2 DAC or Pro will play back the same audio however, as all of the outputs share the same audio source.

Hi! questions I have a Rme Fireface 802 & recently bought the Rme BabyFace Pro Fs since it has a steady clock can I combine them and use the Fireface for IO and the Babyface for monitoring and as the main converter if that makes sense What do you think I should do? Was also thinking of selling them to get the Fireface 802 Fs since I recently found out about it

Great review, thanks Milton. I have an Apollo Twin X that does not have an optical out. I just got the ADI-2 Pro FS R. 1. I'm wondering if I am out of luck connecting it to run my recordings (mic/guitar) through the Apollo into the RME ADI-2 Pro? 2. If so, if it will work if I leverage the Apollo Twin X as my input source on my DAW, and then RME ADI-2 as the output. (will there be much latency this way?). 3. I see Apollo has Line Outs - can those somehow be leveraged for connection into the analog ins of the RME ADI 2? Would appreciate any recommendations.

@SeanHyland

Жыл бұрын

The ADI-2 Pro FS R has a USB connection, so I presume you would just use the Apollo as your input (AD) and the RME and your output (DA) while both are plugged in via USB. You can easily set this up in the Sound Preferences in macOS. If you're on Windows, then I don't know how that would work.

Why is it necessary to set the ADI-2 Pro as the clock source? Is there a downside to keeping the clock source as the Babyface? Very helpful video, btw. I am using both devices.

@SynthaxAudioUK

Жыл бұрын

Glad you found the video useful! We're using the ADI-2 Pro as the clock source in this tutorial as its built-in SteadyClock FS is superior to the clock in the original Babyface Pro and other earlier interfaces. If it was a Babyface Pro FS, then there would be no real difference in terms of clock source, as they both feature FS clocking. Hope this helps!

Thanks for the video. Can I connect studio monitors? I have a preamp. Would the recording chain be correct : microphone into the preamp into the rme into my laptop via USB? Can I use the audient id22 with the rme adi 2 pro? I only record vocals. Is there a big quality step up between the babyface pro fs and the adi pro fs r? Thank you

@SynthaxAudioUK

Жыл бұрын

Hi there! That would be the correct chain, though you may find a bit of latency when recording this way - the ADI-2 Pro FS R isn't really designed as an audio interface, though of course it can be used as a class compliant interface. There's definitely a difference in sound quality between the two units, but the ADI-2 is of course offering reference-class conversion, so that should be expected. For recording, I'd always opt for the audio interface as by design it has been created with audio recording in mind. Alongside this, you get access to TotalMix FX, a powerful signal routing software that does not come with the ADI-2. Hope this helps!

Hello could you help me out? I was wondering if the conversion in the RME ufx plus is as good at this? Or even as good as the baby face pro?

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

Hi, all three units have excellent AD/DA conversion. Any differences between the UFX+ and Babyface Pro will be extremely subtle, and I doubt you would notice any differences in a real world scenario, e.g. a full mix. See this video here from sonic state for a great comparison between both units and Prism Dream converters; kzread.info/dash/bejne/qq2HqNOxgbbgZ84.html The ADI-2 Series is a slight step up in terms of conversion, having been designed as a top-end converter (although 2-channels only, compared with the high channel counts of the interfaces). It therefore lends itself to those situations where the extra detail may be useful such as mastering and measurement testing etc. Depends on the application of course whether you require that fine level of detail.

How do you route a guitar signal so that you can use the effects of Logic pro.Directly so you can hear the effect in real time. Playing the signal afterwards is no problem. Please help

Hi, I read all the comments, but I didn't find the answer to my question. I use Presonus audiobox 22VSL and I want to upgrade to some RME product. I'm not recording anything. I only use my DAW for post production, mixing and mastering with a lot of plugins etc. and now I want the best sound. My question is if I buy RME ADi-2 PRO SE is this product suitable for my work? Will I have problems with latency / buffering? Or should I stick to Babyface or Fireface UCX? - Thanks.

In order to connect the babyface pro to adi 2 dac and also my tv, what options do i have ? My tv only has optical and hp out, and the optical in on adi 2 dac is already used by the babyface. Would like to use my monitors on my tv.

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

Hi there! If I've understood what you're trying to do, you could try an optical to coaxial cable or optical to coax converter and run from the TV to the coaxial input on the DAC. There appears to be a few options online that are relatively cheap. We can't vouch for how well a cable or converter like this would actually work in principal though!

What are the main differences in conversion quality between the ADI-2 Pro FS R and the Babyface Pro FS? I'm not sure if it has to do with just the implementation of the clocking (Steadyclock FS) or the monitoring capabilities of the ADI-2.

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

Hi Milton, both the ADI-2 Pro FS R and the Babyface Pro FS have SteadyClock FS, so you'll get the benefit of that technology with either device. Discussing sonic differences between RME devices is difficult since all of them follow a similar goal of 'transparency', although in terms of sound quality the ADI-2 series are a step above any of the standard RME audio interfaces. That being said, the Babyface Pro FS really is an excellent sounding interface already - I personally own one and I love it! And whilst I'd also love to have an ADI-2 DAC or Pro as well (maybe one day...), I don't particularly feel I'm missing out with the Babyface Pro FS - it already sounds fantastic, and gives me the benefits of proper RME drivers and all the flexibility of TotalMix FX. The dream combo is of course like we show in this video - an RME interface with an ADI-2 DAC or Pro tacked on, which will give you that 1% or 2% extra. We're talking fine margins here though, and it depends on the usage case. Most of the music I do is dance and electronic based, and personally I think an ADI-2 is probably unnecessary or overkill for what I do (synths and drum machines...). If I was recording and mixing more classical, jazz or acoustic instruments in my work, or if I was regularly mastering for myself and other people, then I'd probably be looking to add the ADI-2 Pro or DAC to my setup. As it stands I'm perfectly happy with my Babyface Pro FS for day to day music production duties, although if money was no object I'd definitely add an ADI-2 as well. Hope that helps clarify things a bit!

@nujaz

Жыл бұрын

I’m experiencing a reduction in volume with this setup… and I’m afraid to push my ADI 2 Pro fsr too much. Seems if I want full volume I have to listen directly from the Babyface. While I am using lower power Headphones (beyerdynamic dt 770) I really can’t detect a great difference in audio quality between the two units.

The babyface operates at 24 bit but the Pro FS operates at 32 bit, does this mean audio is effectively limited to 24 bit?

is it possible to use a 9 pole dsub cable (male to male) to connect the adi 2 pro fsr with a ucx 2 directly without using the breakout cables in conjunction with either aes xlr cables or spdif cables ?

@SynthaxAudioUK

Жыл бұрын

Hi there! This would be possible, but would require a custom-designed cable with the pins assigned correctly for both units. You can find the pin assignments in the manuals of both devices. Hope this helps!

With this setup , can I record in 96 kHz or am I limited to 48 kHz via. ADI2 Pro FS in 96 analog inputs ?

What are the practical applications of this setup? Cause BS Pro FD has already the AD/DA converters built in.

@SynthaxAudioUK

Жыл бұрын

Hi, we made this video in response to RME users asking for the best way to integrate the ADI-2 DAC or Pro with an RME interface. This gives you the best of both worlds - TotalMix FX for routing and mixing, and ADI-2 level conversion (which is a slight step above the converters on RME interfaces). In the case of RME's older interfaces like the original, 'non-FS' version of the Babyface Pro that we have in this video, you can also clock your interface to RME's newer clocking technology (SteadyClock FS).

Thanks Matt, Can you connect the ADI-2 Pro FS via AES Ports? I have a UCX II and just purchased an ADI-2 Pro. Want to use it for the output of my Daw without giving up ports. However, can the clock signal be sent via AES? Regards.

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

Hi Robert, wow nice setup, that’s pretty much the cutting edge of RME right there! Yeah sure you can clock over the AES-3 connection (or SPDIF or ADAT). It’s probably best to set the UCX II as clock master so that you can change sample rates from your software, and set the ADI-2 Pro to receive its clock from the AES (see 4:43 onwards). (Note that we actually set the ADI-2 Pro as master in the video, but I’m sure you’ll get the gist. You just need to do it the other way around, i.e. set the ADI-2 Pro’s clock source to AES rather than internal, and set the UCX II’s to internal in your Fireface USB Settings.)

@RGMDG

Жыл бұрын

@@SynthaxAudioUK Thanks Matt. Sorry I didn't respond sooner. I re-watched the video and it was very helpful again. I am absolutely loving my RME equipment. By far the best Audio equipment I have ever owned. I have had some pretty nice stuff in the past (Antelope Audio and others). The RME sounds absolutely stellar..

@SynthaxAudioUK

Жыл бұрын

@@RGMDG Thanks Robert, glad to hear you're liking what RME has to offer👍. All the best.

So the adi and baby face need to connect to the computer together?

Hi Synthanx Audio, can I use the Madiface Pro to do this?

@SynthaxAudioUK

Жыл бұрын

Hi there! Unfortunately not in the method described here - the ADAT I/O on the Babyface Pro has been replaced with MADI on your interface and that means there's no way of connecting to the ADI-2 DAC FS or Pro FS R digitally. You could connect to either device using the analogue outputs of your interface, though this obviously won't offer the clocking benefits of SteadyClock FS. Hope this helps!

I have the RME ADI-2 PRO FS R BE and was wondering...if I attached a Preamp to it via balanced XLR, then will the two have the same functionality as the Babyface? Will it then be a fully functional Interface, using the Preamp as the zero latency monitor? Or is it truly better to buy the Babyface as the preamp/interface? Thank you, Joshua

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

Hi, the short answer is no, you won't have the same functionality as using a Babyface with an ADI-2 Pro FS R. Longer answer; the ADI-2 Pro can only operate as a class compliant interface, meaning you don't get RME's custom low-latency drivers. You also don't get access to TotalMix FX for routing control either. So yes, whilst you can connect your mic pre to the ADI-2 Pro's inputs for recording (and monitor it via the ADI-2's headphone output), what you cannot do is monitor the input signal and playback from the computer without going via your DAW, which will introduce latency. This may or may not be a problem for you. The easiest method is to simply connect the ADI-2 Pro to an interface or sound card (e.g. via ADAT).

@lavapanther

2 жыл бұрын

@@SynthaxAudioUK Lovely, thank you. I will use my old babyface.

Thanks for a great video. Just wondering what are the advantages of using RME ADI-2 DAC FS and ADI-2 Pro FS R with BabyfacePro FS. Cause I do own an BabyfaceProFS should I also get RME ADI-2 DAC FS and ADI-2 Pro FS R for pro audio please? kindly let me know. Thank you.

@SynthaxAudioUK

10 ай бұрын

Thanks for your comment! The ADI-2 Series have been designed to be reference-class AD/DA converters, and so produce the best possible audio conversion as well as offering the clocking technology of SteadyClock FS. There may be some users who require the top-end of audio conversion - whether that is for mastering, or for the best possible monitoring solution - and the ADI-2 would be a fantastic addition for them when things like room treatment etc have all been considered or achieved. For the majority of users, like yourself with the Babyface Pro FS, it might not be the kind of upgrade that is needed instantly. The Babyface Pro FS already features SteadyClock FS and the audio conversion is great as it is. For those with older interfaces looking to improve audio conversion and add improved digital clocking, adding something like the ADI-2 series to a setup will help improve this without the need to buy a whole new interface. Hope this helps!

@ABS_AD77

10 ай бұрын

@@SynthaxAudioUKThank you very much. I do mixing and mastering myself. After looking for a best quality mobile audio interface, I bought Babyface Pro FS. I am happy with the conversion quality. But off late I am looking for the best AD/DA and best headphone amplification on my mobile interface for mixing and mastering on headphones. Just wondering how much more quality jump would be there from Babyface Pro FS to ADI-2. If there is significant jump in quality, I would like to make the move to upgrade, but if Babyface Pro FS is competitive enough, I would settle with status quo. Thanks for your advice.

Hello, it is possible to pass from a Presonus Studio 68c via SPDIF to my RME Adi-2 DAC FS ?

@SynthaxAudioUK

Жыл бұрын

Hi yes that should be easy, you'll just need a coaxial SPDIF cable to connect the two devices.

Does the adi 2 pro fs come with totalmix? Will it work with totalmix on its own without having to have another rme interface?

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

Hey! Unfortunately not, Totalmix is only available as part of RME's audio interface range. Hope this helps!

@christiansandoval2193

2 жыл бұрын

@@SynthaxAudioUK thank you

Is It possibile to connect the adi 2 fs to a m1610 via the adat out to use as monitor ?

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

Sure, any of the ADI-2 Series can connect to another device via ADAT (so M-1610 Pro ADAT out > ADI-2 ADAT In). The M-1610 Pro doesn't have ADAT inputs however, so if you want to send audio to the M-1610 Pro from a computer you'll need an interface with MADI or AVB (or you could use analogue).

Just curious, ADI-2 pro, if I increase the bass eq knob in front of the interface, what frequency does it start boosting at and what type of filter is being used ?

@SynthaxAudioUK

Жыл бұрын

The ADI-2 Pro uses a shelf-type adjustment for both the Bass and Treble. Adjustable from 20 Hz to 150 Hz in steps of 1 Hz. The frequency is adjustable from 20 Hz to 150 Hz, but according to the manual the default is 85 Hz. Hope this helps!

@tommymai3062

Жыл бұрын

Thank you

For DAW work. I have an audient id22, say im done tracking and mixing and I want to send my 2 track mix out from DAW to outboard analog gear for processing, I'll be able send it out to the RME (with the USB) the the D>A out of the XLRs, run through outboard analog processing, then BACK into the XLR ins for A>D then back into DAW (again with USB cable) to print the final master 2 bus. This sound correct? Currently I guess I dont mind the converters on the ID22 for tracking the individual instruments, but I worry that with all the hard work of mixing, to send a 2 bus final mix down BACK out through the audient wont give me as good a conversion as the RME ADI-2. Thats another round trip needed and seems RME would hold up the best. hope that all makes sense, im still trying to work this all out. ive never looked into a high end converter like this before. thanks for the review!

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

Hi, sure you can use the ADI-2 Pro for capturing your outboard in extremely high-quality. In regards to hooking it up, I'm not too familiar with the Audient but assuming it has ADAT or SPDIF you'd be better off using that (rather than USB). In using it this way, the ADI-2 Pro is just an extension of your audio interface (i.e. easy to route audio in and out of your computer via the Audient), and will also allow you to clock the two devices together. Alternatively, you can record the ADI-2 Pro via USB (running it as a class compliant interface), however you likely won't be able to use it at the same time as the Audient (or you'd at least need to switch between the two in your's DAW) settings. If you're on a Mac, creating an aggregate device may work, but you'd still need to clock the two via SPDIF/ADAT... So, the easiest method is simply to use ADAT/SPDIF!

@flipnap2112

2 жыл бұрын

@@SynthaxAudioUK thanks for your reply. as is usual, I spent all night researching and my question sounds dumb now ha ha. yes indeed, that all sounds right. Question though, if I am only using the RME as a converter, for mastering ins and outs, I started looking at the older version of the FS (silver plate), its a thousand bucks less and seems like the same converters. I may go that route as I dont think ill need the DSP or the amps on the headphone jacks. Although on the FS-R they said the filters come in handy. what do you think about that ? the silver fs VS fs-R for my needs? thank you SO much for your help

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

@@flipnap2112 Hi again, yeah the ADI-2 FS is essentially just a straight 2in/2out converter so may be all you need (if you're mainly just routing a stereo pair out and back in). Like you say there's no DSP, multiple outputs or DSD play/record etc, however if you just need detailed and transparent recording up to 192 kHz you can't really go wrong. In terms of the filters, in my experience they're extremely subtle, and probably more for Hi-Fi guys to stroke their chins over... Your mileage may vary of course. The ADI-2 FS uses the SD Sharp filter which is the most neutral and has the least effect on the frequency response, hence being the best for audio production. Of the three models - FS, Pro and DAC - all are high-end reference class DACs with exceptional sound quality. All I can really advise is trying them for yourself to see which you prefer. All the best.

@flipnap2112

2 жыл бұрын

@@SynthaxAudioUK That's amazing, thank you so much. I really wanted to check in with you and make sure there wasn't something I was missing. I appreciate you keeping in touch and your advice. Thanks so much and hope you have an amazing week!

I am unable to get audio from my Behringer UMC 1820 to appear in my Babyface Totalmix FX. Can someone please help? Behringer ADAT out -> BBF Optical In and BBF ADAT Out -> Behringer Optical In. Can't get any signal to appear at all from the ADAT connections..

@SynthaxAudioUK

Жыл бұрын

Hi, if you have another ADAT device I would try connecting that first (to help determine if it's an issue with your Babyface or the Behringer). I'd also recommend trying a different optical/ADAT cable, to rule out any problems with the cable. If you're still having problems please contact your local RME support, I'm sure they will be able to help you further; www.rme-audio.de/support.html

If I’m using a cheap audio interface with a low quality DAC built in, would it make sense to connect it to a high quality external DAC? Or should I just get a new audio interface with a high quality DAC already built in?

@SynthaxAudioUK

3 ай бұрын

I would say the best option would definitely be to improve your audio interface first. This way, you’ll also get improved microphone/instrument inputs as well as better conversion too! The ADI-2 series are fantastic products but don’t discount the difference in quality from a cheap interface to a more professional one. It depends on how much I/O you need but it might be worth checking out the Fireface UCX II as an option: www.synthax.co.uk/rme/firewire-usb/rme-fireface-ucx-ii/

This is perfect. I want to upgrade soundwise and already ordered the UCX 2. My question is...When i buy the ADI Pro fs R how do i connect my adat interface with my UCX 2 in conbination with the ADI Pro fs R? I think it's daisy chaining but not sure how in the correct order. Can you help a bit please?

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

Hi Chris, and congrats on ordering a UCX II! You may be able to connect all three devices, but I'd need to know a bit more about your setup; 1 - Are you on Mac or PC? 2 - What device is the 'adat interface'? i.e. what brand and model? Let me know and I'll try to help!

@chrismacintos6304

2 жыл бұрын

@@SynthaxAudioUK Thnx for your reply. 1: I'm on Mac. 2: It's the Behringer ADA8200. Thanks a lot!

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

​@@chrismacintos6304 Ah okay, in that case it should be doable. The short answer is I'd recommend having the UCX II connected to your Mac as your interface (and set as clock master), with the Behringer hooked up over ADAT, and the ADI-2 Pro via AES-3 for your main output. Then use TotalMix to control all of your routing. Here's a more in-depth version if you want a bit more info; 1 - Connect the RME Fireface UCX II to your Mac via USB. Set this as clock master in the RME settings. 2 - Connect the Behringer via ADAT to the UCX II. Looking at the Behringer it looks like its actually an audio interface as well (I thought it was a mic pre at first glance), so I'm working on a bit of an assumption here that it will play nice with the UCX via ADAT... (Alternatively if you have any problems, you could try creating an aggregate device since you're on a Mac.) For clocking, set the Behringer to word clock slave via the back panel. Note that I'm also assuming that you can clock the Behringer over ADAT - if not you'll need to clock it to the UCX via the BNC connection. 3 - RME ADI-2 Pro connected to Fireface UCX II via AES-3 (AES-3 is available on both the UCX II and ADI-2 Pro FS R via each device's breakout cables). I'd recommend using dedicated digital XLR cables for this - you might get away without one if you have the two units right next to each other, in which case the breakout cables may reach. They're pretty short though, and we'd always recommend connecting via dedicated cables anyway - more room to work with, less chance of putting strain on the cables, easier to replace etc. If you buy a pair of AES cables, you can connect the second cable from the Pro back to the UCX, which will allow you to use the ADI-2 Pro's inputs for recording as well. For the clocking, set the ADI-2 Pro as slave (via its front panel). 4 - Finally you'll need to set up all of your routing in TotalMix FX. This should be fairly straight forward if you have previous experience using an RME interface (set the AES-3 output as your Main output, and set up your inputs and outputs for the Behringer). If you're new to TotalMix it may lead to some head-scratching at first though - I'd recommend watching RME's TotalMix tutorial series, or our own videos (they're from back in the day, but still relevant); TotalMix FX Beginner's Guide kzread.info/head/PL0QKeSpeDQwHGxAhD-cJSIBZC7_en5rck RME TotalMix FX Tutorial Part 1 (of 2) - Synthax UK kzread.info/dash/bejne/pXd8ldOPka-yXaw.html Best of luck with it and enjoy your UCX II. If you need further assistance you can contact support for your region here; www.rme-audio.de/support.html

@chrismacintos6304

2 жыл бұрын

@@SynthaxAudioUK I'm laughing. I totally forgot the AES connection. Now i understand how to get it connected. I took a look at the rme breakoutcables. I need to buy them myself i guess. So both devices need a breakoutcable and all i have to do is connect them with 2 fem/male XLR'S? Is that correct? The other connection stays unconnected? (Red white cable) (spdif) These connections are new to me so wrapping my head around it since i have a few months left to wait for the ucx2! But i need to know everything in detail and need to know which cables i have to order to make it work!

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

@@chrismacintos6304 Hey Chris no problem, there’s a lot of different formats out there - we’re thinking about creating some new vids to explain each one, so watch this space :) You’ll get a breakout cable included in the box with each device, they’re basically just there to add more I/O that RME didn’t have space for on the main body. I’d recommend buying proper cables though still - just Google digital AES-3 XLR cables. Make sure you get digital ones of course (analogue XLR cables won’t work for AES). “all i have to do is connect them with 2 fem/male XLR’S?” - Yep! As you’ve spotted, the red and white connectors on the breakouts are for SPDIF. This is another digital audio format that is similar to AES-3 (and ADAT). You can actually use this if you want instead of the AES connection, it’s up to you (just search for SPDIF coax cables). I personally favour the AES connection as the 3-pin XLR is a more solid connector, plus it leaves the SPDIF available for other devices if you fancy running them through the ADI-2 Pro (most consumer devices have SPDIF on there - TVs, games consoles, CD players etc). (Watching blu-rays through a PS4, the ADI-2 pro and a good set of headphones is great fun!)

Work good via toslink with Apollo twin x?

@SynthaxAudioUK

11 ай бұрын

Hi, I'm afraid I don't have any experience with the Apollos, however if they have an ADAT/SPDIF optical I/O you should be able to connect the ADI-2s very easily.

Hello. May I ask why my system is not working when I tried to connect my UCX II to my ADI-2 FS DAC. I am using a tslink cable with one side on UCX ADTA out and another side on ADI-2 FS. I am using M1 Max Mac and all the required software has been installed and my UCX has input graphic. But not the ADI-2 FS. Could you please share how to make them work together or they are meant to be used independently

@SynthaxAudioUK

6 ай бұрын

Hi there, it sounds like a Totalmix routing issue. I'd advise going back to the section in the video that discusses the routing and making sure it is all as is shown there. Hope this helps!

Where are these units made? Germany or China.

@InnerVisions68

Жыл бұрын

Germany

Use of usb port in pro fs r?? Can i record without interface?

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

Hi there! Yes, it's possible to use the ADI-2 Pro FS R as a class-compliant audio interface and record with it! As it's operating in class-compliant mode, there is no access to RME's TotalMix FX routing software however, which may be a deal-breaker if this is something you rely on. If so, you're best checking out the rest of RME's audio interface range!

@applicationmaza4714

2 жыл бұрын

@@SynthaxAudioUK i am not a fan of complex totalmix, can i still record with logic or any daw with same quality?

@andesneko

2 жыл бұрын

@@SynthaxAudioUK So that means there's no ASIO, right? How does the latency fare then? Also, many thanks for the video, it opened many doors!

But what about the quality of the 2 combi jacks as INPUT?!

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

Hi there! Of course the ADI-2 Pro has great quality when it comes to the AD conversion, but wouldn't be our first choice when it comes to recording live instruments (mainly down to latency). If it was for printing a final 2-channel mix or for archiving something like vinyl, they're very useful. But for recording, you'd want one of RME's interfaces to make the most of the low-latency monitoring offered in TotalMix! Hope this helps!

@sekritskworl-sekrit_studios

Жыл бұрын

@@SynthaxAudioUK That helps TREMENDOUSLY! Thank you for answering ALL of these questions. I've been racking my brain trying to figure out all of this "conversion" stuff... Then went to learn some other things, and am now back. LOL Ok, I now have a Babyface Pro FS. BUT, I planned to connect it to the ADI-2 pro. But, here are a few questions: 1a.)Would it be better to use something like a Ferrofish if I want to use multiple analog preamps & effects processors, and just use the ADI-2 for Monitoring? 1b.)If so, would it be better to link them through something like the Digiface USB. 1c.) If not, should I just get a patch bay, to patch the ins & outs to the babyface? 2.) If I am misunderstanding, How would you recommend that I execute?

@SynthaxAudioUK

Жыл бұрын

@@sekritskworl-sekrit_studios Hi again; 1a) Yes you can do that. If you plan to record lots of channels, it makes more sense to have a multi-channel (i.e. more than 2) converter, such as a Ferrofish Pulse 16. You can also still use the Ferrofish to feed an ADI-2 via ADAT. 1b.) It depends, do you need the other I/O available on the Babyface Pro? The Microphone preamps, Line Ins and Outs, DSP FX (EQ, Reverb and Delay), plus the physical buttons and volume encoder. If you don't need any of those then the Digiface USB could be a better choice. 1c.) This is another option. However you won't be able to record to single tracks - a patchbay in this instance would presumably just save you from having to plug / unplug your instruments all the time. So it depends if you want to record multiple channels at once - if you're only recording individual channels then this could work. 2.) Again it depends what you're trying to do, in audio there are often 'many roads to Rome' :) . I would start with the number of channels you require (inputs and outputs), then look at what features you need. All the best.

@sekritskworl-sekrit_studios

Жыл бұрын

@@SynthaxAudioUK Thank you SO VERY MUCH for taking time to assist! I wish there were a way to save comments to our youtube favorites or notes or something.

So basically the ADI-2 is an audio interface then correct? Is there something that makes it less of an interface than a Fireface unit?

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

Yes the ADI-2 Pro FS R is effectively an interface, but it runs in Class Compliant mode. This means you don’t get the benefits of RME’s TotalMix FX. The ADI-2’s focus is more on audio reproduction and conversion and getting the best quality sound from its two input and two output channels. If you look at the new Fireface UCX II or the 802, there is far more in terms of connectivity and features when it comes to actually recording music, which is primarily what an interface is used for. That’s why in this video we are combining an interface with the ADI-2, mainly for its high-end monitoring capabilities. Hope this helps!

@LaminarSound

2 жыл бұрын

@@SynthaxAudioUK Absolutely. Makes sense. Thanks for clearing that up for me!

Didn’t work i followed your instructions using an ADI 2 Pro FS (old version not black with remote) and Babyface Pro FS I have the ADI2 Pro FS main outputs 1/2 with XLR to Genelec 8341 I am also have the Genelec GLM box for room correction - I have tried with GLM connected and disconnected still no sound. I have total FX with main Out assigned AS 1/2 I can see the green metres bouncing yet zero sound. Windows 10 audio selected to SPDIF/ADAT (1+2) (RME Babyface Pro) still zero sound. I have tried increasing volume and no difference. Please advise

@SynthaxAudioUK

Жыл бұрын

Hi, so you can see audio outputting in TotalMix FX but cannot receive audio on your ADI-2 Pro? That would suggest to me either a broken optical cable, or you need to make sure you have the optical input selected as the source on your ADI-2 Pro. I would try a different TOSLINK cable and check you have the SPDIF Optical selected as your input (on the ADI-2).

@mrtim6

Жыл бұрын

@@SynthaxAudioUK I checked one of the optical cables was broken I'm going to retry the whole set up again thank you for your suggestion

useless presentation without clarity, eg, why do you use the Babyface just to use the optical ? IS TOSLink better than the USB ? ADI-2 pro fs has USB input to connect to PC, dont you know that ?

@SynthaxAudioUK

2 жыл бұрын

As we mention at the beginning of this video, this tutorial was developed for connecting an audio interface to the ADI-2 Series as a way of improving the monitoring capabilities of any audio production setup. As the UK distributor for RME we get asked this question a lot, so we thought we’d make a video on it! Later in the video we discuss connecting the ADI-2 series via USB, though as you’ll appreciate, you can’t record microphones solely with an ADI-2, as there is no phantom power. So you’d still need to connect an audio interface with this I/O to be able to do any sort of music production. Hope this helps explain!

@SylvanWilliams

7 ай бұрын

If I used a preamp to power phantom powered mics could we use the RME ADI-2 Pro then to record? I'm trying to figure out if I can buy this and no audio interface? Would probably need one to get instruments like guitar recorded though huh

@dazeja

6 ай бұрын

Because there are those of us that use the ADIs as a DAC and not an interface. This video is to show how you can use both if your interface has ADAT. Therefore it’s an extremely useful video showing you how to use your ADI in different settings.