Time for Germany to become independent, no foreign military bases on its territory.

@landro9369

Ай бұрын

Its to late for Germany.

@Gezira

Ай бұрын

Not only for Germany but for Europe as well.

@Gezira

Ай бұрын

@@landro9369 _"Its to late for Germany."_ Not sure there's such a thing as "to late" as long as a culture exists, surely there must be a will.

@gintasasd6814

Ай бұрын

More like stop americasation of german society most movies videos games etc come to usa hence why Europeans become so American in mentality and culture

@landro9369

Ай бұрын

@@Gezira there is no culture, only language is German, everthing else is "American" still of life. Ocupation is to long and to successfull same like in Japan. They hold all media, political sistem, and they hold money, banks.

It comforts me to see that a very experienced journalist like Edlinger has the same perception of the very disquieting development of the mainstream press, free speech and foreign policy. Sometimes I do question myself, and I think that is not possible, maybe I have fallen into the trap of biased, radical, cospiratorial media. And yet it is only outside the mainstream that I hear people talking sense, not sounding like propaganda, not twisting logic and truth. Thank you Pascal for your important work, and thank you mr Edlinger for stubbornly pursuing your mission!

@ramieskola7845

Ай бұрын

'Conspiratorial' media? Yeah. Truth is 'conspiratorial' and one helluva trap.

If they can do something like that to Yanis Varoufakis, you can imagine what they can do to ordinary people.

Germany 1934 = Germany 2024

@timkbirchico8542

Ай бұрын

Oh no, not them again. Where are the old school socialist German activists? Ein Folk Ein Bullshit.

@PauloAdriano-zo2ng

Ай бұрын

Yes and No. History rhymes, it doesn't repeat.😅

I am glad you exist, Pascal

@PauloAdriano-zo2ng

Ай бұрын

It's called having *integrity.* We need many more like him. I feel so sorry for the heavily censored, the overtly and covertly silenced, and the masses of brainwashed European citizens. I'm extremely grateful to live in a *relatively free* pocket of Latin America.

Fritz put his finger on it, "people are increasingly dissatisfied with the system". Basically the system made the grave mistake of making the left and the right speak together as human beings understanding that we actually see eye to eye on many subjects. This was another excellent episode, thank your for sharing.

Pascal, you are a champ. Keep going. Very impressed with your work.

Pascal Thank you for inviting Fritz Edlinger he is first class Scholar with vast experience in Politics

I'm a recent subscriber. I just want to say that I really appreciate your work. I love the respectful sober style. I think it is really important to the world to day to hear voices of reason and a plurality of opinion. If we are to avoid the disasters of war and other horrors in our future, it will be thanks to people like you. Thank you, Godspeed.

Thank you, Gentlemen - much appreciated 👍

Keep going, Mr Fritz!

Congratulations Fritz . Excellent work you have been doing 🌺💚-bmd

Great discussion. Thank you to both of you, Fritz and Pascal. Looking forward for more of this.

The people of the Americas (most of whom are Christians), including the USA, have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. Because it is easier to divide people based on personal differences, than it is to unite them, based on what they have in common. Strategically ambiguous rulers make use of this, for own advantages. In the era of European Imperialism, first Spain and Portugal entered the Americas, employing the divide and rule technique of top-down power, then after 1900 as European colonial powers' influence decreased, the role of divider was simply taken over by Washington DC (the entire world was the playground after around 1900). *Today, it is the globalists who employ imperialist tools to play divide and rule games on their neighbors.* Now the intention is simply to avoid unity in the Americas, in order to rule over the dissent which is classical divide and rule. Today, their leaders are too weak to unite. Endless wars on anything and everything from "drugs" to "terror", constant dissent. Insert levers of lies, mistrust... Create favorites: favoritism... Point the systemic finger, everywhere else... Divide and Rule. Oldest trick in the book... In February 1948, George F. Kennan's Policy Planning Staff said: "[W]e have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. ... Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity." [Critical question: Who is "we"?] And _that_ is what they did. America's friends and self-proclaimed default rivals in Europe are still being burnt to ensure this disparity continues. *Set up European and Eurasian nations (including the MENA region) against each other.* It is how divide and rule is implemented. The imperialist playbook of Great Britain and the USA for more than 100 years. Read Halford Mackinder (Pivot of History, 1904) and Zbigniew Brzezinski (Grand Chessboard, 1997) regarding Eurasia. Who wields the POWER? Who has had (in all historical cases in the ME/Levant) the GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE of being able to reach all the other little buck catchers (tools, and other Roman-era style instruments of POWER), but could not be reached itself, because of a geographical-, technological-, organizational-, military-, strategic-, political advantage at any given point of a historical timeline? *War is a great "divider."* It goes straight through the heads of millions and billions of people from the very top tiers, right down to the individual level. War divides alignments and alliances, goes straight through organizations, divides political parties, tears through peace movements and other families of humanity, and finally at the very bottom tier, goes straight through individual hearts and minds as individuals struggle with _themselves._ "Most of the great problems we face are caused by politicians creating solutions to problems they created in the first place." - Walter E. Williams That is what empires have always done. Create the *default rival/enemy.* It is usually the power most likely to succeed which is determined as the *default rival/enemy.* Notice how, as soon as a rival starts mass-producing products high up in the value chain of capitalism, and starts vying for markets, and becomes successful, it *immediately* becomes the systemic rival, and is then geopolitically encircled by the greater empire. It happened around 1900, as Germany started building high-value products, and it happened around 2000, as China started moving away from building cheap toys and labor intensive kitchen appliances... The games start on the home turf. The first victims are their own people.

@VickiNikolaidis

Ай бұрын

So true. Thank you for your message.

@ralphbernhard1757

Ай бұрын

@@VickiNikolaidis Thank you for reading.

@HomeCast-td2tu

Ай бұрын

Get a podcast! 😂

@tjoeptjoeptjoep

Ай бұрын

Thank you for this important reminder of the divide and conquer game.

@mariadamen7886

Ай бұрын

I believe that it's not only about calling yourselfa christian but what "christianity" one is a follower of. I'm sure the kind of christianity Scofield and his right arm Hagee? are preaching is the wrong one.

Thank you for taking the time to translate this interview!

Thank you Pascal. Thank your guest. Maybe people will come to some senses . Maybe!

Thank you so much Pascal for introducing us to Fritz and the International publication. I think Fritz is wonderful and I hope we can see him again on future videos of yours. I particularly value his closing summary relating to Europe and its rationship both with

Great Interview, Thank you Pascal.

Also, kudos to translation and narration!

Thank you!We need a different voice than the mainstream media 😊

Pascal has such a serious, focused, calm expression. It’s marvelous and informative to hear Herr Edlinger - an elected representative of a fairer, more intelligent generation. Pascal will carry the torch for the younger generation - huge admiration for him. Just a thought: Europe is not being abandoned by either Russia or China. At the right moment, with the right leader, bonds will be re-built. Even Scholz seems to recognize some degree of reality.

Wonderful...still live minds in German speaking world! Get in touch with Raniero La Valle (Italy--pure heart & soul ). People of conviction must stay united.

“We will continue to fight.” Yes!

Interviews like this here give me hope.

So refreshing to listen to a calm and rational analysis

Thank you ❤️🇦🇹🇩🇪🇨🇭🦾😇

What an excellent video and one that I have been waiting for so that I could understand Europe better. Europe has truly mystified me throughout this conflict. Why is it so destructive? Why does it not decouple from the US and NATO? And I applaud Herr Edlinger for noting the role of Great Britain. Many do not recognize that the U.S. Britain combo has been a disaster. We have totally forgotten that our very first President warned against foreign entanglements and that was a warning about NATO and against involvement with Britain. Yes, it was. And many Americans underestimate Britain’s role in our civil war. I wish the periodical was published in English. I also wish that my college study period in wonderful Austria resulted in better German, but I do know some German and can translate with a bit of difficulty. A German review is indeed in order. Thank you, Pascal.

@ziggys.

Ай бұрын

NATO is necessary, because without NATO most European countries would be Russian vassal states. NATO provides security and independence for Europe.

@sciagurrato1831

Ай бұрын

There are several key drivers in today’s Europe that cannot be discussed here on yt.

Thank you for this interview, which makes us feel that we are not the only ones with this vision of Europe and the world. Here in Portugal there is still a single party on the left that shares a vision very similar to that set out here, the Communist Party. The others, perhaps out of fear of losing support, became implicit supporters of Von der Leyen and NATO's positions. It is incredible how in Portugal even a few retired major generals, who were involved in several international conflicts through NATO, just because they had more realistic positions, for a negotiated solution to the conflict in Ukraine, were immediately named Putinists.

And then suddenly, out of nowhere, and for no reason at all…….Hitler. Looks like Weimar is making a comeback.

Was Edlinger the one who interviewed Jeffrey Sachs in Vienna? That was a brilliant talk!

@neutralitystudies

Ай бұрын

Edlinger was the guy who organised that event! But the one who interviewed him was our friend Professor Heinz Gärtner from U Vienna (some of Heinze's videos are also on this channel).

Respect for telling the truth

You discussed printed media versus online platforms. I would like to add that it is easy on online media to change their consumers attention from one topic to the next like an ADD toddler. This makes it easy to distract the readers or listeners from important topics and catch their attention on sth else and forgetting about what is important.

Let's define 'modernism' as the 'revolutionary' period, in which ordinary people dreamed of utopias and now best to achieve them. The period about which Dostoyevski writes. The period ushered in by people like Marx which lasted until the end of WW2. I think the commonality of most modernist movements was that they were essentially left leaning. That is to say, they were about attempting to better the lives of 'ordinary' people. These movements came by and large in 'international' (communism) and national (fascism) flavours. The focus was on the collective, whether that be all humanity, or just those deemed 'citizens' of particular countries. After the war Europe enjoyed a period of peace and prosperity which was a hangover of modernism, which by that point had been moved politically to the centre and lost its more revolutionary edge. What we might call the 'centre left'. This period ended in the late 90's. The US is fond of calling this period 'the great peace' which they believe they sponsored, but was actually just war weariness in Europe. Now let's define post-modernism (the period between say, 1995 and today) as essentially right wing modernism, which comes in both international and national flavours. This came about because the US largely sat out modernism, and in fact views modernism simply as a period of unrest and war, without fully appreciating the causes of that unrest (what came before modernism). We are in a time of unrest for two reasons then: 1. The US ran up 40T in debt believing it would never have to pay it back. Most of that money ended up in the back pockets of individuals, or was spent on overpriced weapons. 2. The period began when the US first used the term 'leader of the free world' (I think that was Bush Jnr?) The US has taken over and is ill-equipped to do so, because it sat out modernism.

@BrennanYoung

Ай бұрын

Good. Yes, the post WW2 period saw the USA become the cultural leader of Europe, in line with its hegemonic position. Some key moments are the overthrow of Allende (the violent installation of the world's first neoliberal regime under Pinochet), and the elections of Thatcher and Reagan, although these politicians were/are regarded as culturally conservative, family values etc.. Then there is the end of the cold war, and the deliberate cultivation of widespread disillusion about even lukewarm forms of socialism (e.g. school milk, or nationalised railways). Later on, almost all the socialist and social democratic parties got on board with neoliberal ideology, via various versions of "third way" rhetoric, essentially a capitulation, and abandonment of any form of class consciousness. I am not sure I *entirely* agree about your characterisation of postmodernism between 1995 and today as right wing. At least, *today's* right wing are constantly whining about "multiculturalism", "diversity", cultural relativism (which they invariably call "cultural Marxism") and other similar social-liberal values which are (in my mind) central to postmodernism. They complain about "today's cancel culture" but seem to have forgotten that McCarthyism was a hugely successful, mainstream anti-leftist project all about cancelling people with the wrong opinions, I would locate the birth of postmodernism between the late 1950s and mid 1960s (the Beatles, pop art, exotic recipe books, trips to Marrakesh or Goa), and I would absolutely associate this more "catholic" form of postmodernism with the centre-left, or cultural liberalism. As McCarthyism lost its grip, postmodernism took over. The mid-to-late '90s saw a shift from that chaotic, experimental "anything goes" postmodern ethos of the later cold war period, towards an overtly globalist, and increasingly authoritarian neoliberal vision, not unlike that of the Pinochet regime, which is essentially the ideo-colonial project of 'the Washington consensus'. To achieve a broad base of support for this project, the ruling elites were rather *obliged* to co-opt the radical civil rights movements that had emerged in the '60s. Not those fighting for global communism, but those fighting for (e.g.) gay rights, or "save the whale", or "rock against racism", or vegetarianism or any number of boutique causes which were still hanging around after the the fall of the USSR. (Please note, I am not arguing against homosexuality, or vegetarianism or whales etc. here). Conservative politicians with "other" skin colors and "other" sexual preferences, and the discourse about "glass ceilings" for female professionals started to appear at around this time. It is revealing that the peace movement was never successfully co-opted, a position which the political centre today absolutely despises, but the liberal/centre-left *has* succeeded in pushing out all its peaceniks. These days, the lion's share of the anti-militaristic discourse is found amongst libertarians, who are often characterised as extreme right. OK, terms like "right" and "left" change their meaning in relation to the overton window, of course, so they get used in very particular ways. The term "cultural Marxism" appeals to today's right wing because "Marxism bad", but they are essentially complaining about an ideology that Pinochet would have been happy with, as long as Chicago School economics dominated all policy decisions. It seems to me that "left" in today's vulgar understanding, and especially in anglo-saxon culture, means *any* identarian politics, as long as *class-based analysis is entirely omitted* - and such an omission means that we now have a kind of "left" which is about as far from Marx as it is possible to be.

@ytrichardsenior

Ай бұрын

@@BrennanYoung I think it lost my long reply to this. But in short : you shouldn't attribute identity-politics (wokeness) to the left. The left is still the same, it's about solidarity, no matter what colour you are or where you like to put it. Wokeness is a thing attributed to the left by the neo-con media as part of it's concerted 'culture wars' project, funded by people like Steve Bannon. They like to drag out weird people to talk about pronouns and statue toppling, hold them up to the public and suggest that this is what the left is. It's not.. It's still about the 99% (no matter what they are) vs the 1%. Divide and conquer has always been how the 1% handle the 99%

Wow thank you for this translation

Great man. Men. Thanks again

" As long as it is possible..." It is not that we don't know where is this heading.

toujours très intéressant mais sans doute trop intelligent pour beaucoup. Merci.

Thank you, Pascal. It is interesting to hear the voices of the living left in Europe. As a Japanese, I recall the anti-war left in Japan used to idealize German's sincere reflection on the Nazi crimes in contrast to our LDP government which tried to downplay the war crimes and colonization. Even during the Iraq war, there were many European who criticized and took distance from the US. The war in Ukraine was something eye opening for me about Europe, and of course I find similar situation here in Japan where the leftist parties are also now too weak to stop the coming war with China.

Good words

Wonderful Pascal! How many languages does he speak? What variety of speakers and clear explanations of the guests.

Oops. Fritz’ summary on Europe and its relationship with America and NATO. I’m going to hook up with Fritz’ video channel now. He speaks for me and many others here in the UK. THANK YOU AGAIN.

The question has come. Do humans have a right to exist ?

Subscribed to international 👍

@neutralitystudies

Ай бұрын

Tha for the support! Even if they publish in german only. Much aporeciated!

I'd love to hear from the highly perceptive former Austrian foreign minister

Bruno Kreisky is rotating in his grave to see what has happened to the Austrians and how they've been selling their neutrality and conscience to the highest bidder. INTERNATIONAL is really important, Videos are really important as the youngsters are not readers.

Bitte Pascal, deutschsprachige Interviews auch im Original hochladen. Danke

@literatious308

Ай бұрын

It’s on Pascal’s German language channel

The undefined left and right, is a concept of Gustavo Bueno.

Is it possible to broadcast the international channel in English?

31:00 ❤

Dear Pascal, please upload a version of this interview in the original German. I much prefer to read subtitles than listen to an interpreter, especially with an American accent. It is too incongruous. Thank you in advance.

Long live older young socialists.

28:34 ❤

👍✊♥️

The translation is not quite up to par. But I appreciate the amount of work required. AI better than nothing.

From a pov from Greece, Varoufakis is a troublemaker and self promoter. He talks well but his actions are embarrassing. He had a year to promote the Greek people and make positive changes. He did the opposite. Please respect your viewers and continue having moral and action oriened guests. Thank you.

@BernadetteBradleyLewis-uh9og

Ай бұрын

wot do u think of the IMF and Frau Van the man?🍀

Thank you for this information and contents dully noted and would like to thank the guest for his unrelenting efforts to bring truths to the people of Europe and my dear Sir, this needs to be put on steroids, to counter these futile attempts to keep this hegemony alive and the younger generations are just sitting back and blindly accepting of this existence as though there can be no other solutions. My generation of people were born out of activism given the racist country I grew up in and to see the wanton disdain of governments towards their populations and if this generation blindly continues not giving a damn, our would have been the last generation to stand up for HUMANITY.

Cant say i didn't warn ya

German conservative and right-wing siding with racist Israeli is not because they want to atone for past racism or anti Jew biases( this is the term to use as Palestinians and Arabs are sematic so antisemitism doesn't make sense), but because they converted the modern Israeli to their genocide cause.

@rezrunnercl

Ай бұрын

That crossed my mind, too.

@sciagurrato1831

Ай бұрын

Genau.

In clear english nato is the Mob within 😅

kalifat will be the next step for Europa. For the UE election, there is a muslim party.

discontinue government separation from God

Please lower the volume of the person speaking the original language. Super annoying. Especially when you understand German.

Is this again someone that says let Russia take everything outside Germany.

The best way to combat propaganda, is to turn off this channel.

Great to find you

that was very interesting

✊

Hey, dude who hosts this channel, you realize that you speak english, right? You don't actually have to hire some english guy to do a voice over when you speak. You know you could just translate your own german speech into english using your own voice, right? ;)