Hundreds of Billions $ in today's money 400,000 jeeps and trucks 1386 M3 Lee tanks 4102 M4 Sherman tanks 11,400 Aircraft 8,500 of which were fighters 1.75 million tons of food And so much more.... 18 million tons of goods total And that's just the Soviets Not to mention all the aid we sent to all the other countries in Europe except for Germany of course. And then the billions of dollars spent after the war to rebuild Europe.

@ilyashokov9820

2 жыл бұрын

Don't forget that Americans were leasing the supplies, wich means in the end america profited from it

@Pikkabuu

2 жыл бұрын

Of which 2/3rds came AFTER 1942! IE. after the critical years and most notably AFTER Germany had lost the war!

@ilyashokov9820

2 жыл бұрын

@Brian Home account america only gave a few thousand tanks, (the American Sherman tank was also extremely dangerous for the crew beacuse of bad armour and it caught easily on fire beacuse of its gas engine, and also had a smaller cal Canon and was slower in speed) while russia produced over 35,000 tanks so the American tanks were less than 1% of the tanks russia used. And after the war, even in the 1970s, russia still didn't return all the trucks america gave, then they decided to return scrap metal instead, beacuse its much easier to ship scrap metal across the ocean than full sized trucks, and those trucks would have been scraped either way, so they did return. American aircraft numbers was less than 1/4 of russias planes. And even though russia did take alot of territory after the war, if they didn't stop hitler, the whole world would be speaking german. Just think about it, the biggest battle america fought in was in d day, and it only included about 75,000 American troops, and by the time of d day, many german soilders were running away from the east were they were fighting the soviet union to surrender to American, British, and Canadian soldiers, beacuse they knew they the war is over for them, they will either be killed or captured, and they knew they would be treated better if they were captured by British or Americans. Also remind me, who conquered Berlin (Germanys capital) was it america or great Britain, no, it was russia. I don't remember the exact number, the soviet union conquered Berlin either 2 weeks or 2 months before the rest of the allies got to Berlin. Also I can name you many examples were a fairly small group of soviet soilders were standing of much bigger german attacks for long periods of time, where they would be constantly attacked for many months, in some places for over a year. Winston Churchville en said that the future generations will understand how much they owe the red army. If only he knew how wrong he was. Also in 1945 there was a poll in Europe on who the people think defeated Germany, almost 60% said russia and only 20% said america. Than in 1994 the poll was done again and 50% said america defeated Germany and only 25% said russia. And in 2004 the poll was done again and almost 60% said america defeated Germany and only 20% said it was russia. This just proves how america rewrites history, and America's brain washing making people believe america defeated germany

@ilyashokov9820

2 жыл бұрын

So by the time america went to Europe, the Germans would just surrender, mostly america was able to walk into cities without resistance. So in all reality, d day was completely unnecessary

@SCLHP666

2 жыл бұрын

@@ilyashokov9820 tanks are not the problem, food is. Almost 2 million tones of food, like a thousand pounds per ton.

Harry Truman: “If we see that Germany is winning, then we should help Russia, and if Russia is winning, then we should help Germany, and thus let them kill each other as much as possible. But under no circumstances do I want Germany to win. "- Senator Harry Truman, from the speech of the Chairman of the Commission for the Study of the Federal Government's Weapons Program June 23, 1941.

@anonnieman

3 жыл бұрын

@ClickNSpam one is American (far right) and goes to other countries in order to judge who is right or wrong, overthrowing democratic and other governments in spite of the wish of the people, killing many. Point is that your 100 million is an estimate which is beyond the amount of inhabitants at that time and has nothing to do with second world war (as does my statement about the US). Demonisation of the Soviet Union serves nothing unless one assesses ones own country first and tries to objectively look at the USSR.

@anonnieman

3 жыл бұрын

@ClickNSpam talk to Iranians if you want to know what they think of the American intervention and of then reinstating the Shah: spoil alert they still hate them for it to this day. Just because a country is Communist or Islamic, does not mean they are evil. In many countries the people chose communism and it works very well for them. In Eastern Germany a big part of the population wants to be communist again, because back then they had everything and now they are poor. Who is anyone to judge about someone else's desires.

@kemaltsoofy498

3 жыл бұрын

@ClickNSpam lets not talk about afganishtan,the middle east,the middle and south america ,greece,granada,iraq,syria and so on....the good americans brought us liberty and democracy.just for loughs....

@kemaltsoofy498

3 жыл бұрын

@ClickNSpam The countries you mention are far the most islamic and far from the democracy countries of the world.Their population is far the poorest in the world. god bless america and the supportes of it ! Iran was one of your favorite as far as the dictator shah was in charge. dictators all over the world are the one you prefer.greece? argentina? africa? Chile? (you remember PINOCHET?). PANAMA? tELL ME PLZ,WHO ARMED THE TALLIBANS?Tell me plz who had relations with al qaida? Tell me plz ,who helped isis to become the terror of the world? the fact that you are talking about countries and their population calling them shitholes,makes me understand your ideology.AND if you call them shitholes because of their poverty,remember that usa is the main guilty for that.

@fightsports66

3 жыл бұрын

Harry Truman was not Vice President at the time this was said in 1941. Truman was just a United States Senator from Kansas when he made this statement. He would not become Vice President for another three and a half years in January, 1945. More importantly this was never U.S. policy. The United States never supplied Germany with weapons to attack the Soviet Union. Yes he made this comment but since this never happened I do not understand what point you are trying to make.

And do not forget the precursor. After architect Albert Kahn built many of the auto assembly plants in Detroit, in the 1930s when things were slow in the U.S. the Soviets hired Kahn (among other engineers) to build Soviet tractor factories (like Stalingrad). He built a dozen plants, which after the German's invaded, they were able to fall back on and get started producing the T34

You forget the most importan thing we gave them trains

I absolutely hate how Russia has this reputation of being invincible because it's cold and muddy for a good part of the year. Finland and Germany's success is all it takes to see them as they were before the US gave them $16,120,227,272.73

@Pikkabuu

Жыл бұрын

Except that the Germans were stopped before more than a fraction of the money arrived...

@KolyaUrtz

Ай бұрын

Russians turned things around way before help came. Study the timeline. Also russia won many wards before ww2 so your comment is pointless. Actually...russia won vast majority of wars it ever fought...which explains why so few people created such a huge country. Russians are simply built different

75 dislikes are simply the Soviets raging😂

@thesmuggest6680

3 жыл бұрын

tHe HElp waS NOt necEsSaRy

@thesmuggest6680

3 жыл бұрын

@Hawk ZR I summon you

@commander_expendable

2 жыл бұрын

@@thesmuggest6680 yeah tell that to the battle of stalingrad which was prodaminitely fought with soviet equipment, and the american tanks sent to them were so inoperable they just scrapped them and used their parts in the t 34

@Jagnole101

11 ай бұрын

@@commander_expendableis that why Albert Khan was hired by Soviets to build tractor factories like the one is frickin Stalingrad? The Soviets had terrible communication systems and needed ours for their tanks. Don’t believe the video? Look up what Zhukov and Stalin said about the Lend Lease. Pretty sure they have more insight than anyone else in regards to the Soviet war machine.

@colebeans3145

11 ай бұрын

They even more mad when a lot of Americans nowadays wish we helped Germany instead 🔛🔝🔜🇩🇪✝️✡️🖕🏻

Yea dont forget we save uk and France and china as well

It's hard for me someone who is a proud American and who's grandfather fought in Japan and in the Korean war To give credit to the USSR and I'm by no means doing this because of their old political ties but because the Russian PEOPLE themselves are full of heart and were ready to defeat fascism if it Meant they were all going to die. The USSR lost 27 million people now I couldn't imagine the US losing that many people at 1 time it must have been terrible so my hat goes off to them and how brave they were.

@scepteredisle

2 жыл бұрын

And now the Russian people are mostly fascist and Russia is a fascist - Nazi - country now. Live and learn eh? And let's not forget Soviet Russia ALLIED with the Nazis. War only broke out between Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia because Hitler stabbed Stalin in the back. Let's be real here.

@deason2365

Жыл бұрын

It was the Soviets idea to gang up with the nazis to split Europe in half and plunder it. What do you mean fight fascism, if anything fascism is just diet communism

@matthewivresse3706

Жыл бұрын

Soviets meant Ukrainians, Belarusians, and all of the numerous central Asian nations… Russians like to say “Russian” when it’s convenient. The commanders also had barrier troops that shot any Soviet soldier who retreated so it wasn’t all “heart.” In fact they started the war with the Germans in 1939 before their friend turned on them. Just tragedy and brutal all around.

Love the heroes of the military

The sad thing is the U.S. helped stop the war but Russia thinks we are still shit.

@enderreaper1482

2 жыл бұрын

No Russia acknowledged that the us made tremendous contributions. It’s just that they disagree that they would’ve lost without it

@Pikkabuu

2 жыл бұрын

@User Name Again. Japan attacking the USSR would be nothing more than a suicide by cop. The Japanese were short on oil and their logistics were already overstretched in China! So attacking Siberia is already insanity BEFORE you add in the fact that Siberia isn't an easy place to invade...

@earlbinvico

Ай бұрын

Leaders like Kruschev and Zukhov did acknowledge the importance of Lend Lease. It's until recently that Putin has started pushing narratives again, saying Poland deserved to be invaded, and that the USSR defeated Germany alone, when it simply isn't true, and it isn't shameful to admit that they didn't do it alone.

were there any joint operations between the Red Army and their wester Allies?

@Pikkabuu

Жыл бұрын

No due to their geographic location. But they did try to time operations to be at the same time.

@superdevton1137

Жыл бұрын

It could be argued that Operations Bragration and Overlord were kind of a joint operation

Yeah the lend lease with the Russians gave them time to get on their feet as the factories were moving

@Pikkabuu

2 жыл бұрын

Except that the Lend-Lease kicked in after 1942 and by that time the factories had been moved...

@cccaaawww8685

2 жыл бұрын

@@Pikkabuu OOP sorry

@JLMoto999

Жыл бұрын

@@Pikkabuu Totaling $11.3 billion, or $180 billion in today's currency, the Lend-Lease Act of the United States supplied needed goods to the Soviet Union from 1941 to 1945 in support of what Stalin described to Roosevelt as the “enormous and difficult fight against the common enemy - bloodthirsty Hitlerism.”

@Pikkabuu

Жыл бұрын

@@JLMoto999 And? As I said, while Lend-Lease started in 1941 the vast majority of the Lend-Lease material came AFTER 1942!

@cooldudecs

Жыл бұрын

@@Pikkabuu yea when Russia made progress

How did cold war start if you can make a video on this.

@stackertheeod7566

3 жыл бұрын

Because these two countries had very much opposed views and didn’t really like one another, but they came together to fight the common enemy of Nazi Germany. Right after the war, however, the alliance quickly fell apart

@ianfairfield8373

3 жыл бұрын

@@stackertheeod7566 It’s sad seeing how quickly a bond can break

It spread ? WELL I KNEW IT KILTER ONLY WANTED A FEW COUNTRIES.

How the U.S. saved the nazis: "Thanks to the maneuvers of the West German justice, as well as the "compassion" of the Anglo-American occupation authorities, 8 out of 12 leaders of the main SS directorates saved their lives, and then were freed, and in total - 16 out of 30 senior SS and police leaders. Of the 53 thousand SS men who carried out the order for the extermination of "inferior peoples" as part of the "Einsatzgruppen", only about six hundred people were brought to justice".

@anonnieman

3 жыл бұрын

Both are right and wrong in all aspects. It is difficult to prove that a soldier (in this case Waffen SS officers) did something wrong out of their own beliefs or because it had been an order. The Soviets did not just kill Berlin citizens because they wanted to. A major part of the Berlin population was involved in the Volkssturm, both adults and teenagers if the HJ. These citizens therefore were soldiers and coming from all angles, which made it difficult to determine who was a soldier and who was not, resulting in way more deaths than ought have been necessary

@anonnieman

3 жыл бұрын

@ClickNSpam I don't have to tell you that a popular phrase about US soldiers was that the Brits fought while the Americans fucked your girlfriend :') on alls sides of the war a lot of rape went on on German soil. The USSR were not the ones to bomb down whole German cities just because then you were sure that the factory was out costing hundreds of thousands of lives.

@kemaltsoofy498

3 жыл бұрын

@ClickNSpam lets not talk about DRESDEN..PLZ stop be a victim to usa propaganda.

@thelovertunisia

3 жыл бұрын

The Cold War had started, cards had to be reshuffled. Im not american Im from Tunisia but politics is the same everywhere: no permanent allies, no permanent ennemies, only permanent interests.

@kemaltsoofy498

3 жыл бұрын

@@thelovertunisia thats a big truth...

Very interesting! Thanks for sharing!

@jonasemilaksnes

3 жыл бұрын

i don't belive what he is saying is true tho

@yourfriendlyneighborhoodcl4824

3 жыл бұрын

@@jonasemilaksnes It is true

@jonasemilaksnes

2 жыл бұрын

@@yourfriendlyneighborhoodcl4824 how so

@yourfriendlyneighborhoodcl4824

2 жыл бұрын

@@jonasemilaksnes Have you watched the video?

You heard Stalin Russia yall gotta chill

Am not here to undermine any one or something but the fact is every 8 out of 11 Nazi soldiers were killed by the red army...and they conquered Berlin at the end of the day And most importantly they fought as allies, just as allies should do...

@user-uj9li3cl1r

3 жыл бұрын

Jack sparrow tell us please, Who captured Poland in 1939 with nazi???For thouse who forgot,soviet were in alliance with nazi till 1941.

@anonnieman

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-uj9li3cl1r they were not allied to the Germans. They had a single piece of paper that only said they would not attack one another if they would try to conquer Eastern European countries. The majority of the fighting took place between Germany and the Soviet Union and the Soviet Union "liberated" (as they replaced the power with a soviet government after the war) the Majority of countries in Europe. There was also a lot more fear for the Soviet Army then for any of the Western allies. Not everything the Soviet Union did was bad. ;)

@kemaltsoofy498

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-uj9li3cl1r when you say POLLAND you mean the coyntry that after the first w.w.and the defeat of the ussr from Germany, declared the war to USSR and captured all the countries we know today as Latvia ,Lithuania,Belarus,Estonia and part of the Ukraine?In 1939 the USSR took back the lands that was stolen from its body with the poland-ussr war of 1920.plz tell me that you want Poland to have all theese countries back!!!

@kystars

3 жыл бұрын

I would like to know where you get that figure from?? can you name a source? I find that hard to believe. Also the German military was under pressure from the other side. They had to keep at least half their forces in France etc to protect against an invasion. also to fight off allied bombing raids. The Germans lost a lot fighting the allies. I actually met and know a former German soldier from world war 2

@chemicsky2772

3 жыл бұрын

@David S. no they didn't lol produced most of everything and defeated japan its pike saying Britain fought just as much against japan as the u.s

Whitout US, soviets wouldn't won the war. Everybody talks about winter but winter is just a season. Winter could postpone the invasion for 4-5 months and unaided Russians could exile the steppes. So many people underestimates the importance of American support to Russia.

@Pikkabuu

Жыл бұрын

The Soviets didn't get pretty much any aid in 1941 and still managed to stop the Germans. So nope. The Soviets could have won too. It would have just taken longer and demanded more blood.

@user-br1ql3ty5l

Жыл бұрын

@@Pikkabuudude, I don't think we should discuss logical facts. It is clear that without the help of the allies, the Soviets would have been destroyed before 1943.

@KolyaUrtz

Ай бұрын

@@user-br1ql3ty5l Help came in 1943...while russia completely humiliated germans and completely turned things around a year before that. Russia would have won ether way, it would have just taken longer and more people would have died. You dont understand russian resilience and will to not die. Germans were waging a genocidal war and if you think russians would have ever surrendered you are delulu. Our ancestors would have fought to a last russian which basically means germany would have lost ether way.

SPAM. We saved them with SPAM

Ain’t that ironic I’m eating pizza

That victory in 1945 was not just a Soviet, US, British or allied European victory. It was OUR victory! We all earned it and did our part to ensure the Axis was 100% annihilated. People of all nations of the former Allies need to stop downplaying all our war efforts and just appreciate the greatest generation for all of their sacrifices.

@user-rn5ou7dn4p

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly

1943- Stalin: "COMRADES, I need you to open a second front!" Western Allies: (Invades Italy) 1944- Stalin: "COMRADES, I need you to open a second second front!" Western Allies: (Invades France)

@croweman6515

3 жыл бұрын

@MSgt Baca yes, I know what land lease was... AND?

@flogger8413

3 жыл бұрын

@MSgt Baca Lend lease helped but it is not what won the war. The USSR did have lots of production, they started moving their production eastward as early as 1939, just took a while to rebuild. The most help in my opinion was supplying food in the early part of the war because the economy in the USSR was near collapse.

@thesmuggest6680

3 жыл бұрын

@@flogger8413 Realize how much the lend lease act helped. Even Zhukov (Jukov) himself admitted it. The amount of resources the US gave is insane. Also Britain would've had that much aid too if it wasn't for the U-boats.

@thesmuggest6680

3 жыл бұрын

@@flogger8413 Most of their factories were also captured before the lend lease act. So around 1943 did the Soviets start mass producing.

@thesmuggest6680

3 жыл бұрын

@The Crusader Oh great... Pls just read a book on the subject I've had enough arguments for a day.

Thanks such a forgotten topic. In my opinion your analysis understates contribution from the Western Democracies to the USSR and its Communist Forces in WW2. Never forget that the USSR invaded Poland in an agreed pact with Hitler! And after Barbarossa, we realized that we had to keep the Commies in the game so to speak! This was a major objective of the Battle of the Atlantic. The numbers I had are somewhat similar. But the Troop truck contribution was far greater adding Ford and GM Trucks, The Total US/Brit/Canadian Total was 550,000 Troops Trucks. Also the Brits supplied Tanks as well, not very good ones but a tank was better than no tank. Yes the Hurricane, and yes it was a success! The Spitfire wasn't a success as it was too much of a thoroughbred. Plus the USA and Britain gave over 1,000,000 field telephones, otherwise the Commies would have had to using flying pigeons! And Canada, USA, New Zealand, Australia, and South Africa gave the Commies enough food to keep them going! And now is the time that we support Ukraine against the new NAZTI on the block Putin and his evil ideology PutiniZm. Anyway the Strategy worked for us Westerners, as when D Day happened the Germans had 196 Divisions Facing the Commies and 35 Divisions for France and Italy!

Russia and the US used to be allies... What happened? 😔

@BDB2004

2 жыл бұрын

The Cold War happened

@maddude6342

Жыл бұрын

Only when the humanity have one enemy they would become one. I wish aliens would just attack us so we could join forces.

The USSR gave their blood...we gave the means to fight. BOTH were necessary.

@thanos8948

3 жыл бұрын

lol russians could have easily won the war without us, us to this date takes credit for a war in which it meddled

@acanadiancapitalist2107

3 жыл бұрын

@@thanos8948 US did so much to do a lot during ww2

@thesmuggest6680

3 жыл бұрын

@@thanos8948 Ah yes of course. Data which even the Russians themselves can prove it's real. Ya know just asking, where the hell are you from?

@thanos8948

3 жыл бұрын

@@thesmuggest6680 Jersey

@thesmuggest6680

3 жыл бұрын

@@thanos8948 Then you should learn to praise your own nation for what it did right and good.

The USSR took 3,000 Hurricanes - as they were the preferred fighter for escorting bombers. Their slow speed meant that the pilots could not wander off and chase German planes, they had to stick with the bomber. As the Hurricanes were more maneuverable than German planes and could easily get behind German planes in a dog fight.

Patton: "We defeated the wrong enemy."

Considering we essentially funded, arms, and did the production for the USSR, and that we did nearly all the heavy lifting and forcing Japan to surrender, and also contributed too many battle victories on the European / Western Front, it seems the big dogs in that fight besides Nazi Germany was the US. Considering the USSR couldn't even produce enough equipment or artillery to defend itself. Interesting info man, thanks

@onziponzi9824

2 жыл бұрын

Forcing japan to surrender,the Japanese were scared from the soviets who occupied Manchuria and North Korea...7/8 of the Wermacht was destroyed by Russia and the biggest battle in the WW2 was in the Eastern Front...

@onziponzi9824

2 жыл бұрын

Not to mention that in the Eastern Front no german soldiers surrendered...

@commander_expendable

2 жыл бұрын

by the end of world war 2, teh soviets had nearly 17 million mosin rifles, somwhere between 30k - 40k t 34 tanks mostly the 76mm model, had a fuck ton of artillery guns and the soviets did the heavy lifting considering their industries were on the other fucking side of the ural mountains

@Pikkabuu

2 жыл бұрын

The war was decided in East. By the time Allies landed in France and US started to get those victories in West the Germans had lost the war already long time ago. And no. The Soviets had massive production and actually build MORE T-34's than US build M4 Shermans! So you should really take off your rosetinted glasses and look at the facts.

@lazargrujicic8303

2 жыл бұрын

you supplied around 13% of the soviet army, congrats you joined the war to brag about it, when in reality you didnt do too much

A lot of good that did us.

Pure propaganda, the USSR received 24% of American aid to other allies during WWII (by comparison, 30% of this aid went to the UK); - 57% of this aid (more than half) arrived in the USSR between July 1943 and December 1944 - Only 25% of US aid has gone directly to the military budget, most aid being civilian. with or without American help, Zhukov would have beaten Paulus in Stalingrad in 1942. Futhermore Germany raised 783 divisions during World War II and of these 783, 586 were destroyed by the Soviet army.

@packofredapples8

3 жыл бұрын

"The most important things in this war are the machines.... The United States is a country of machines. Without the machines we received through Lend-Lease, we would have lost the war." - Stalin

@valeriavictrix340

3 жыл бұрын

@@packofredapples8 Future President Harry Truman, 1941: If Germany wins, we have to help Russia and if Russia wins, we have to help Germany, so that it will die a maximum on both sides. Henry Ford: "Neither the Allies nor the Axis should win the war. The US should provide both sides with the means to continue fighting until both collapse. " What do you think about that ?

@packofredapples8

3 жыл бұрын

@@valeriavictrix340 That is precisely what happened. The Nazis were defeated in 1945. The Soviets were defeated in the 90s, by the allies and United States.

@stackertheeod7566

3 жыл бұрын

@@packofredapples8 fuck yeah

@valeriavictrix340

2 жыл бұрын

@User Name The Wehrmacht was destroyed in Russia by the Red Army. The Allied landings in Normandy met only a few German units in under-staff deprived of fuel. The German army and all available resources were on the Russian front. Stalin kept calling on his allies to open a second front, to lighten the weight of the massive German offensive that has weighed on the USSR since 1941. But the Anglo-Americans moved slowly: it was not until the end of 1942 that they decided to land in Tunisia, far from the Russian front. They will take more than six months to go to Sicily and then almost 18 months to travel to Italy, while the Royal Italian Army has ceased to exist since September 1943 ,The Anglo-Americans will advance at the speed of the snail, causing the justified exasperation of the Soviets and the irony of German propaganda.

Thanks for lend lease! btw Chezh was on German side

@shululu7572

3 жыл бұрын

we weren't on the german side, we were occupied, still fought the nazis though

@old891

3 жыл бұрын

@@shululu7572 you wrong) it was voluntary occupation. And you become disenfranchised ally. Hitler’s forge.

Whillys drift!

Not right, most of supplies begun after battle of Moscow which was a first turning point in the war and after it Germans had 0 chances of winning. American supplies didnt change anything, Soviets just would lose more soldiers

@sd.kfz.2345

3 жыл бұрын

Ya sure ya comi we were the only reason they won

@smoaky123

3 жыл бұрын

Lmao nothing but revisionist non-sense. Cooked up propaganda to make the soviets look better after the war. You should be ashamed for spewing such lies…

@WorldHistory42

3 жыл бұрын

@@smoaky123 Which books have you read to make this kind of comment? None? Bye kid🤣🤣🤣

@Stockfish1511

3 жыл бұрын

My great grandpa was veteran of WW2 from soviet union, he used to tell the stories to my grandpa and grandpa told me. My great grandpa battled in alot of places. He battled in Crimea specifically in Kerch at the begining of the war, though to be a hellish place. He battled in stalingrad and all the way to berlin later. He told that those american supplied were mostly usefull in terms of food etc stuff that you use to maintain personal health etc. Tanks etc were near useless as they broke down and no materials were avaiable to fix them aswell as nobody really knew how to fix them. Most of them did ansolutely nothing. I think people drastically overestimate this "us supplied" On bigger scale this supplies are most unnoticeable. Us propaganda is just awful and they have dumbest people to believe it. Most of their people dont even know what soviet union was or geogrophical changed during ww2. Most of them are just cleuless in terms of history etc. My great grandpa told that turning point of the war was mainly the spirit of the army and the forrocisness of the individuals fighting as the germans got closer and closer the stakes became higher. They knew the atrocities that germans do with the captured peoples and civilians. So they worried alot about their families and their lives and therefore fought with absolute savagery that broke wehrmacht. The army was bitter, angry and very revenge driven due to nazi crimes etc hence why they fought with such agression. But he used to say that after soviets started advancing it was starting to be noticeable that soviet army was more and more well equiped and technical superiority of germans no longer was a gamechanger. But he always said that the war could not have been won without the courageous fighting of the army. Soviet union won with sheer force of will and movilization of massive number of militar equipment after 41-42

@smoaky123

3 жыл бұрын

@@WorldHistory42 I’d say around 15-18, I’ve only studied the eastern front for almost a decade and have lived all over parts of the old USSR.

Russia today is so arrogant

& in exchange, the Soviets paid for it with the lives of 27 million of their soldiers, sailors, airmen & civilians & to them can be attributed the infliction of some three-quarters of all Axis military losses

Having watched Eastern Front documentaries for many years I do not recall seeing any Sherman tanks used by the Russians in combat footage. Apparently they did engage in battles, so is there anyone who has viewed this on actual film.

@n8zog584

Жыл бұрын

The issue is that most of the Soviet combat footage (and American and German and British footage) was highly propagandistic and done usually to advertise THEIR countries vehicles, or equipment, or men. The soviets were no different, sometimes being more egregious. (especially after ww2 during the cold war) the Soviets really didn't want to support the idea that they won ww2 with the aid of material from capitalist countries. So often they would only include t34s or yak-9's in their footage. Once the soviet union fell there was also some evidence that the Soviets had scrubbed their archives of foreign aid since 1945 when foreigners were sometimes allowed access to their archives.

Dude 75% of the nazies were in the east , what are you talking about !! , 8 from every 10 soldiers from germany died in battles with ussr , who saved whom ?!!!

@kystars

3 жыл бұрын

I agree. I get so tired of hearing the Russians WON world war 2. BULL. The USA was fighting in HUGE numbers in both the PACIFIC and in EUROPE. DOOLITTLE'S COMMAND of the American 8th air force.. sending the fighters in huge sweeps of the sky AHEAD of the bombers, caught the German Luftwaffe off guard. instead of them being allowed to get to the bombers which were still far away, the American fighters were on top of them. After the war, the Germans said his strategy put us on the defensive the rest of the war. and the American bombing campaign destroyed all of our industry. but it is true IF the GERMANY military had its full POWER and could use against Russia it would have been a different story

@Ali-ps3xq

3 жыл бұрын

@@kystars nothing comapred to the russian force in europe my friend , the us and uk began the battles in europe in late 1943 , and the real offencive was in 4 june 1944 , in this date see where were the russians , in 3 years the russian almost fought alone in europe , and when u read the history u understand of course without the cooperation of us , uk and ussr , it would be a diffrent story , but just put the facts and the west with time is forgetting who did the much of the work in europe

@coffeelink943

3 жыл бұрын

Али Акрам Russians are amazing after all, even though I live in U.S. i still pay and respect to the fallen heroes of USSR that died and sacrifice themselves to make the war winnable as possible to the west. Even though U.S and Russia may not have good relationships in modern time but politics does not change my mind about the russian people, because fuck politics, it doesn’t bother my personal daily life

@Ali-ps3xq

3 жыл бұрын

@@coffeelink943 i live in russia , and belive me they hate ur government but not the people,

@coffeelink943

3 жыл бұрын

Али Акрам I know bro, majority of the world doesn’t like U.S government and I won’t be in denial about that, we did a lot of multiple crimes that not even I can count. I do have overseas friend that doesn’t like my government but not the people and I can see their point of view. Overall I met some Russians students in my university, especially from Saint Petersburg’s , Veliky Novgorod, and Moscow and trust me bro, we all get along each other easily. What part of Russia you’re from?

1. LA -5FN 2. P -51 3.YAK- 3 4.YAK - 9T

@Ratstalgic

2 жыл бұрын

0.9. MIG-3

@deason2365

Жыл бұрын

1. P 47

EL OH EL

So you list important Lend Lease things and the second on the list are Shermans...things that didn't arrive to USSR until 1944, as you also said, by which the Allies would have to seriously TRY to lose the war! So the Shermans were of NO IMPORTANCE at all!

@acanadiancapitalist2107

3 жыл бұрын

He right bud. You mad Soviet. Always have to think the soviets did everything. You have allies and teamwork. We fought together. Not a single country did better. We all fought for our lives

@konartist206

3 жыл бұрын

No importance at all? The Shermans tanks were in Berlin before the allies were, open a book. This isn't the "wests" propaganda this is out of the mouths of the ussr's leaders back then. It's good to have pride and be prideful, but at the same time it 1 of the 7 sins.

@Pikkabuu

2 жыл бұрын

@User Name And your evidence of that is....

@Pikkabuu

2 жыл бұрын

@@konartist206 Sure...I should open a book...you do understand that had the Soviets not have the Shermans then they would have had T-34's?! So the Shermans WEREN'T pivottal in getting the Soviets to Berlin just like I said!

@Pikkabuu

2 жыл бұрын

@User Name You really should do more research as the Soviets WEREN'T struggling,and the Japanese couldn't ever threaten them as fighting in Siberia isn't as easy as you think that it is!

How *SOVIET UNION* saved America: Invades the whole east europe in 1.5 years

@strangerthingsfan5601

2 жыл бұрын

Bruh Soviet union was loosing until 1944 so no

@enderreaper1482

2 жыл бұрын

@@strangerthingsfan5601 umm they were only losing until 1942. After Stalingrad, they gained the upper hand

@Pikkabuu

2 жыл бұрын

@@strangerthingsfan5601 Losing until 1944?! By 1944 the Soviets had stopped the German attack towards Moscow, kicked the Germans out of the Caucasus, beaten the last real German offensive at Kursk and liberated Ukraine. But no. The Soviets only started winning in 1944...get a history book kid and educate yourself.

@ilyashokov9820

2 жыл бұрын

@@strangerthingsfan5601 until mid 1943, not 44, and I would want to see America fight battles as big as the ones Russia fought, and don't forget who took over Berlin, was it the Americans, the British, the Canadians, no, it was the red army. if America switched spots with Russia, they wouldn't Strat winning not by 1944, not by 45, and probably never.

@strangerthingsfan5601

2 жыл бұрын

@@ilyashokov9820 1942 us and other allied powers took on Germany at its prime time and pushed it away from uk to France back to Germany so yes us could do that easily

I've already made a comment about the issue with lend lease but I don't think i was specific enough so here goes. The lend lease programme didn’t affect crucial battles like the battle of Stalingrad, Leningrad and Moscow. Taking the fact that the USSR had more than 33 million men ready to fight the Germans, produced the most tanks throughout the war(not including lend lease tanks) and had the best tank in the war in my opinion (IS-2) i think it’s safe to say that the Soviets could have won the eastern front alone and even without lend lease equipment the Soviets would still be the largest, best equipped land army in history. Lend lease did speed up the process of victory in ww2 but was it decisive? Definitely not. The main reason why Germany lost was because of it’s horrible oil crisis, there was a reason why they tried to take over the caucuses oil fields but still failed because of the fierce Soviet resistance in the South(that wasn’t even provided with lend lease equipment at the time) and the Soviet victory at Stalingrad which helped turn the tide of the entire war(which also wasn’t affected by the lend lease programme). The Soviets also had the highest production rate than any other country throughout the war in pretty much everything, tanks, weapons, planes etc. Even if the Germans were somehow able to take Moscow, Stalingrad or Leningrad, i really don’t think Stalin will give up and say “well we tried” the Germans would still have to suffer from the huge casualties which could not be replaced after these battles, they would have to fight a whopping 33 million more men and a shit load of tanks thanks to the Soviet production rates of tanks and other weapons and the extremely long and tedious German supply lines thanks to how big the USSR is which would also affect Germany’s logistics problem as if it was any good in the first place. Even then, I’m pretty sure the Soviets would end up fighting to the bitter end just like how the Germans did in reality, this is also backed up by real world history where Napoleon invaded Russia but still lost the war because of the reason as stated above “Russia being too bloody big which affects logistics and supply lines” not only that but when Napoleon’s men entered Moscow the Russians responded by literally burning down their homes so that Napoleon would not be able to steal the food and supplies from the Russians. A more important question to ask would be, if the USSR didn't exist back then, could the western allies succeed in defeating Germany by themselves? Answer: No, the west won't stand a chance without the USSR, again, almost 80% of German casualties were on the East, not the west and about 70% of Germany's resources were poured on the eastern front, not the West and only 15% of German soldiers from the East were transferred to the West to fight the allies and this 15% of Germans just so happened to still somehow win against the obviously superior western allied manpower, taking these facts, you really think the West would stand a chance to fight all 100% of Germany's men even though they took more than a year to beat back the 15% of Germans that were stationed in the West? the battles on the west were miniscule compared to the east, the USSR was fighting big and heavy battles with huge amounts of casualties on both sides. In conclusion, let's examine some undeniable facts, Germany was unable to capture Moscow, Leningrad and Stalingrad even though the soviets had no lend lease equipment at the time, the lend lease act wasn't started in earnest for the USSR until 1944, just before d-day. Operation bagration1944 dealt the final blow to germany and by d-day the red army already reached the Polish border by late June 1944. The allies were fighting miniscule battles compared to the Soviets and were still struggling in trying to achieve victory over these small battles. No such problems or cohesion among the Soviet chain of command. Paris was captured unopposed. 80% of German casualties were on the east and as stated above, 70% of German resources like manpower etc were diverted to the Soviet front. In general, the Soviets could have won ww2 alone, with or without lend lease and could even win the whole of ww2 even if the allies didn't invade France in 1944 while the allies would have lost the war without the USSR soaking up Germany's resources, casualties and their manpower. I do expect to get some hate but honestly, I really don't care. Go ahead and argue in the comment section if you want, just make sure you read the whole thing even if you hate reading.

@stackertheeod7566

3 жыл бұрын

Couldn’t have beaten Japan though. The US navy singlehandedly beat Japan without any problems. The war in the Pacific is half of the war, you know

@commander_expendable

3 жыл бұрын

@@stackertheeod7566 the soviets kicked their assess and took manchuria in a single week

@commander_expendable

3 жыл бұрын

@@stackertheeod7566 and thats just manchuria, they also won against the japanese in border conflicts and skirmishes in 1940

@historyisawesome6399

Жыл бұрын

The thign you fail to forget is we gave them 2000 trains that saved them

Soviets would have defeat the Germans without help. when soviets build such advanced units in a lot of numbers Germany stood no chance and were pushed back US entered the war when Germany was fighting a superpower and was fighting on the side Germany was weak.

@jonasemilaksnes

3 жыл бұрын

i think a german solider wrote in his diary for every soviet solider killed a 100 new ones appeard. brw sorry for the bad english

@savazabadava7753

3 жыл бұрын

@Red Alert i mean the Soviets were so advanced they like had more then 100k tanks, artillery, aircraft about more then 10k and the air superiority was a complete success, the Germans couldn't even fight back, of course the soldiers the soviets had a lot more dead and injured. But still they even had more soldiers. So by my logic they would have won because Hitl4r hoped to defeat them quickly. Let me explain how war works. If Poland now wanted to attack Russia and they buy as much best tanks aircraft etc. And then they had more tanks and everything then Russia but they need a fast win Because Poland doesn't have the technology to make awesome tanks aircraft and that. But Russia does So if Poland attack Russia. Russia would bounce up military as soon as possible. They would build everything in 10k numbers. And Poland would be crushed. Like you people think Pakistan, India, and those countries who have a lot of tanks like 5k plus are stronger then Germany who now only has 200tanks? No same situation. Edit: i put dots and made countries with like russia and Russia

@vuktodic1356

3 жыл бұрын

@@jonasemilaksnes well it was more like maybe 2 more but soviets never outnumbered germans by so much, they only outnumber them because they used their brains and german intelligence was bad so they did not spot a huge build up near the frontline that would later result like 5 to 1 for soviets

@michaelsebourn3425

2 жыл бұрын

Not true soviets didn't have enough guns America supplied gun and amo, trucks russia would have fallen without American help

@jadenhiggins7167

2 жыл бұрын

Nah the soviets had the manpower but not the guns or bullets or food to do so which America gave them all that so no they would have lost without American support and the U.S sent engineer's to the soviet union to help kick start the T 34 production which was the soviets main battle tank

The Sherman tanks at the beginning of the war were bad compared to Soviet t-34s and models in 1944 weren’t very important because Soviets had so many t-34-85, is-2 or isu 152 that nobody found stop this massive storm

@stalker8896

3 жыл бұрын

​@MSgt Baca Да да это Американцы выиграли войну и взяли Берлин ! Все врут что это СССР ! куда уж нам с нашими Т34 ! они же все ломались прям на заводе ! ​ @MSgt Baca 👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎

@fordgtguy

3 жыл бұрын

T-34 is only great in games, they were poorly produced and only saw success due to the sheer amount made and the suicide tactics forced upon Soviet tank crews.

@someguyontheinternet8282

3 жыл бұрын

@StatikTiger you need more reason than that

@SCLHP666

2 жыл бұрын

@StatikTiger shit reason, all German guns up from the panzer 4 could pen the front of the t34. The only existence of armor found on a tank which was EFFECTIVE was on the tiger 2. It was impenetrable. I’m not being a nazi lover saying this rather I’m just stating facts.

@deason2365

Жыл бұрын

Most t34 deaths were do to suffocation, and it beat the inventor to death when he was testing it. Find me one example of either or happening with a sherman. What's that..? It attachly had the highest rate of survivability of any tank in the war

the us military did really help the Soviets but they did give them a bunch of stuff to aid them but the USSR did produce all necessary equipment by it self

@jadenhiggins7167

2 жыл бұрын

Not really though out 1941 and 42 most soviets cities and factories were being bombed thats why the soviets relied on the Americans so much for supplies

They did not save ussr they only helped them There is two factors which are soviet capabilites and production back then and also timing in both factors ussr outproduce almost everything plus lend lease never arrived at crucial point at least one from usa which only started in late 1942 so mid of stalingrad campaing and did not start impacting soviets until mid 1943 and it really ramped up in late 1943 by 1944 ussr was providing soviets with quantities considered enough but by that point war was lost for the germans who later with usa exaggerated lend lease as cold war propaganda and made peoples to believe in total nonsense

@parable8711

2 жыл бұрын

No not even close. America supplied the USSR with 80% of its food because all of the farmers were conscripted and that left women who were still using horses and wooden plows to grow food which wasnt efficient at all. The USA supplied 50% of all the vehicles that the USSR, you're severely underestimating the amount of aid that the USA provided. Without the food, the USSR couldn't feed their troops or their people as they were consuming more than they can produce, without the vehicles and parts for those vehicles, they wouldve been reduced to using horses in combat against German tanks, without the train cars and spare railway parts, the USSR couldn't have supplied their troops. Without the USA the USSR probably couldn't have won. And if they did win, they would've lost millions upon millions more.

I agree, that the United States biggest contribution in the Great War was giving the Soviets shoes and things.

@coffeelink943

3 жыл бұрын

Shoes, steel, copper, food, medicine

@aviatichy3394

3 жыл бұрын

@@coffeelink943 USSR won the war alone.....

@joseph_bunnyman318

3 жыл бұрын

Wrong just wrong.

@aviatichy3394

3 жыл бұрын

@@joseph_bunnyman318 ye ye, dont forgot who was in Berlin first!

@skoookum

3 жыл бұрын

And space lol, a particularly sore subject.

. .

It was the Other way around... Without russian troops Germany would trampled American and british troops.

@omnamahshivay9644

3 жыл бұрын

You r right

@anonnieman

3 жыл бұрын

@David S. that is true, but one must not forget that the majority of the armed conflict took place between German and Soviet forces and not on the other side. Both must not be underestimated, but especially not the Eastern front.

@davidpacknett8639

3 жыл бұрын

America sent arms and equipment to help fend of the Germans America was fighting a war on two different fronts back then it was a lot harder to transfer troops oil food and gear over 1000 of miles

@tariqnasneed3857

3 жыл бұрын

The Germans never had a chance to invade the UK or the US. You were the only ones needing saving.

@jadenhiggins7167

2 жыл бұрын

What are you talking about the Germans had the soviets on the run in 1941 and 42 there was a reason why the British leader and Stalin wanted the U.S to join the war so bad and that's why d day happened to create another front for the Germans so they would focus on the Americans ' British and Canadians coming from the west so no wrong

How the U.S. saved the Red Army in World War II Jeeps okay then

@tommyhallum2054

2 жыл бұрын

150 Billion $ in total Goods 400,000 jeeps and trucks 1,386 M6 Lee tanks 4,102 M4 Sherman tanks 11,400 Aircrafts over 8500 were fighters 1.75 million tons of food 18 million tons of goods total And that's just the Soviets that's not to mention every other country except for Germany that we sent aid to in large quantity. Not to mention the billions spent to help rebuild Europe after the war

The soviets would of won regardless of us joining or not. It just round of taken longer

@AnshuOP69

3 жыл бұрын

yes but more deaths:C i want to come back

@devinmcgroot7560

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, you can't beat the Russian spirit sorry

@AnshuOP69

2 жыл бұрын

@User Name bud. Japan had to handle China there. Soviet would win. Russian winter. 30K tanks

@jadenhiggins7167

2 жыл бұрын

Only 2 things saved the soviets in ww2 number 1 is American support and number 2 was the harsh russian winter without those the Soviets would have lost to the german war machine

@devinmcgroot7560

2 жыл бұрын

@@jadenhiggins7167 nonsense. americans joined only in the end, and soviets pushed germans back to berlin from the east side. the allies helped on the west side. remember that ussr is also an alliance of many countries.

The title of this video should be : how the USSR saved the world from nazis.All of your words in this video are with no evidences. The USSR was helped military from usa ,but not in numbers that could do any difference. You "forget" to mention that the USSR had to pay for most of them,especially after1943. It is really for loughs the fact that the USSR was reinforced with tanks in 1944. In 1944 , the war had allready turned good for allies ,after the colapse of the eastern front and especially after the great battle of tanks (kursk) ,that was given with no western tanks .The most important fact of all, is that although the Soviet Union,was urgentlly asking for the opening of a second front, from the allies,in order to relieve the pressure the country had,the allies didnt do it,until the USSR,managed to destroy the nazi's troops and start marshing for Berlin.The allies refused to do so,in order to make the USSR forces ,less capable for the next round.We also have to see , who allowed Germany to be a strong military coyntry ,who did not react in the offencive policy of Germany against tcechs,austrians,polish, who had an embargo to the democratic Spain ,while Hitler and Mousoulini sent troops to fight for Franko (read Hemingway). thank you for publishing this sight of history.

@davidpacknett8639

3 жыл бұрын

America was fighting a war on two different fronts back then it was a lot harder to transfer oil gear food troops while Russia could barely supply there army on there on turf not only that but he was helping the Soviet before they even entered the war

@fredcoen220

3 жыл бұрын

.

@konartist206

3 жыл бұрын

@@davidpacknett8639 nope, u have to fight in western and southern Europe oh yeah you also have to fight the whole of the Pacific AND supply the allies, oh and the new ussr ally in raw materials and finished goods.... oop and u have to build a few factories in the ussr to aid in tyre making. Also a 1 billion interest free loan would be nice to, oop, nvm instead can we have some food, blankets and boots to?..K thanks. Oops I almost forgot, if ur trucks and tanks get blown up or a total loss in the war, can you not charge us for them... you know that lend lease thing and all that junk, K thanks smooches. These events are in no particular order, it's just stuff that happened. Anyway, hope u got a laugh outta my dumb. 🍻 man, God bless the States 🍻

Lendlease never reached 15% of USSR military Material and only 20% of that arrived before the victory at Kursk when the USSR effectively defeated Germany.

It was the red army who defeat the Nazis because Red Army delayed the tank advancement of Nazis and created the chain reaction.

@JV22ism

2 жыл бұрын

Due to the lend lease. Without it. The red army won't be able to hold it.

@hanslansher6584

2 жыл бұрын

⚡️🇩🇪⚡️🔪🇷🇺

@JLMoto999

Жыл бұрын

Totaling $11.3 billion, or $180 billion in today's currency, the Lend-Lease Act of the United States supplied needed goods to the Soviet Union from 1941 to 1945 in support of what Stalin described to Roosevelt as the “enormous and difficult fight against the common enemy - bloodthirsty Hitlerism.”

@UserName-om6ft

Жыл бұрын

without US Lend Lease the USSR would have been steamrolled

@ericlind6581

9 ай бұрын

That doesn’t equate to defeating the Nazi. They played a role but needed American supplies to do it.

US saved the Red Army ? 😂😂😂😂

What’s?! That’s not true! US didn’t helped to the Russians or Soviets in a whole history of world! I’m the Doctor of Historical Sciences and also the Rector of the University! I know history as my 5 fingers.

@yourfriendlyneighborhoodcl4824

3 жыл бұрын

Proof?

@btcasn8019

3 жыл бұрын

And also the Soviet Union was drawn incorrectly:)

@yourfriendlyneighborhoodcl4824

3 жыл бұрын

@@btcasn8019 I said i wanted sources

@btcasn8019

3 жыл бұрын

I meant that yeah US actually did helped to Soviet Union some times but not that much like “without US Soviet Union wouldn’t won the war”.

@btcasn8019

3 жыл бұрын

The Soviet Union did the most hard work during WW2 and My grandmother was also a Soviet Solider - Heavy Machine Gunner of DShK. And She told me all of the history that was happened with her.

1) WW2 did not start with Germany. It started with Japan attacking China. That also empowered Hitler since there was no response. 2) Germany had no control over Japan. 3) while lend lease helped the Soviet union, and FDR would double their military machine requests, the Soviet union also made better tanks than the USA. Their T30's series we're good and equaled the Tiger Nazi tanks by the end. Also, their rocket launchers that they made were more effective than USA weapons. The AK-47 was a stolen Nazi gun design and parts cut out to make it simpler.

@tpl608

2 жыл бұрын

@Brian Home account they had tanks. In fact, the USA made their tank off their blueprint. Cite your sources in any admission. The Soviet union could have done what china did, move the population away to fight later. China moved even railroad tracks and buildings. The Soviet union would have just moved east.

@tpl608

2 жыл бұрын

@Brian Home account they had tanks. In fact, the USA made their tank off their blueprint. Cite your sources in any admission. The Soviet union could have done what china did, move the population away to fight later. China moved even railroad tracks and buildings. The Soviet union would have just moved east.

It’s all fake ......KZread please delete this video

America didn’t do any help to Soviet Union or Russia in World war 2

@jayasaikrishnas7810

3 жыл бұрын

First do some research about it , if you don’t know anything then please don’t comment on it

@jayasaikrishnas7810

3 жыл бұрын

i know about the lend-lease act in which UK helped the soviets not the USA necessarily, well even though if they would not have supplied these goods through lend-lease the soviet union would have won the war alone on it's own

@jayasaikrishnas7810

3 жыл бұрын

@@okbro1623 the lend-lease act supplied only most of the 10% of the soviet army which means UK only supplied the arms and weapons which combined with the soviet army would make only 10% of it even without which the soviets would have won the war easily at their will

@jayasaikrishnas7810

2 жыл бұрын

@User Name america never helped or any supplied russia or the great soviet instead it was competing with the soviet from so long back as from 1917 itself even russia could have defeated japan to but america supported japan by sending their troops and equipment and weapons for japanese to fight the war, you are really brainwashed by the publicity and the dominance of america how unfortunate this world is to be dominated by the worst country ever

@jayasaikrishnas7810

2 жыл бұрын

@User Name what a false of info

Title of this video is one of the worst miss information on the internet.

BS lies lies lies

Вы серьёзно думаете что эти крохи которые США поставляла СССР сыграли хоть какую-то роль в войне

Naah,totally biased. Russia defeated nazis on their own.

@izayo4447

3 жыл бұрын

maybe in 1948 with more casualties there are also North Africa and Italy fronts before the d-day

@commander_expendable

3 жыл бұрын

@@izayo4447 they beat the shit of the italians with partisans as well as responsible for breaking the germans at kursk, which marked the germans last attempted advance in the war

@jadenhiggins7167

2 жыл бұрын

Nah bro without American supplies and the harsh Russian winter the Russian would have stood no chance against the well trained and equipped German war machine

Soviet could win the war even without US help

@catland101

2 жыл бұрын

NO you wrong

@jayasaikrishnas7810

2 жыл бұрын

Russia would have easily won the war even without the help of shitty america

@theivoryking.2582

2 жыл бұрын

Lagta Tere bhi vahi red cancer naam ki bimari hai.🤦 Bhala maan ki winter ne aur western allied Ne jo help ki usne USSR ko girne nahin Diya.😂 Kyonki USSR ke baad agala number US and UK ka aane vala tha.

@jayasaikrishnas7810

2 жыл бұрын

Beta US aur UK ka Baap hai USSR, US didn’t help Soviet Union

@theivoryking.2582

2 жыл бұрын

Red is already dead, 1991. 😂😂 Kaun kiska baap hai ye to pata chal Gaya.

The soviets did not need the help of the americans

@357reasons7

3 жыл бұрын

I agree. Russians 100% could win with their shitty ZIS-5 and wooden sticks to fight tanks with.

@ecksdee1637

3 жыл бұрын

@@357reasons7 and without the USSR, not only would 80% of germans not die, but most importantly, the USSR wouldn't cut trade with Germany, including CRUICIAl OIL

@357reasons7

3 жыл бұрын

@@ecksdee1637 most of german forces were placed at western front, check your sources before commenting!

@ecksdee1637

3 жыл бұрын

@@357reasons7 Are you kidding me? Over 80% of Germans died on the Eastern front and 80% of Germans FOUGHT on the eastern front, YOU CHECK YOUR SOURCES

@357reasons7

3 жыл бұрын

@@ecksdee1637 Oh I see now, you are a vatnik!

Mistake and stupid.

@lazargrujicic8303

2 жыл бұрын

im gonna clarify why, before americans rush to reply to this comment, the US did send aid to the soviet union, but the soviets paid for it, and the "aid" arrived in 1942 and onwards, by that time, the soviet union stopped germany on their own and started to push them back. the aid was semi-helpfull, since by the time it arrived, the red army was well equpied and ready to take on the wehrmacht. machines such as the sherman or m3 tanks were mostly useless and were scrapped for t34 parts. only around 13% of the soviet army was supplied by the american land-lease. this number was going down towards the end of the war, since the soviet union had the industrial might to produce millions of rifles, tanks and planes, making the land-lease essentially useless from late '42 and onward. the only way the americans helped is by opening a second front on d-day '44 along with the british, canadian and commonwealth forces, further weakening the allready crumbling german army. considering that around 80% of the german forces fought on the east, the western allies had a much easier time going through france, belgium and the netherlands then the soviets had going through poland, and german occupied balkans (they had it easier in yugoslavia because of the hundreds of thousands of yugoslav partisans fighting alongside the red army) . In the pacific, the US did do a lot of fighting, but you forget that china was in war with japan since 1936, 5 years before the US even joined ww2. the soviets occupied manchuria, and the southern part of an island(of which i forgot the name because its some shit in the middle of nowhere), thus threatening japanese mainland of an amphibious invasion. all the nukes did was seal the doom of fascism in japan. overall, the US did do shit in the war, but nearly as much as USSR, China, and the UK, not to mention the countless lives of partisans who died trying to liberate their country from nazi occupation.

without russia the world would have lost to nazi germany. without USA russia would have either defeated germany or makde a tie bust still take alot of nazi land. russia was the MVP during ww2 not usa or the west

Another americancentric view of how america won ww2 by itself. Selecting facts instead of looking at the whole story. The allies won the war by helping each other and each needed help from the others.