Play War Thunder now with my link, and get a massive, free bonus pack including vehicles, boosters and more: playwt.link/taskandpurpose24

@pyeitme508

26 күн бұрын

Bruh, the game shows secret military details 😂

@rocko7711

26 күн бұрын

🇺🇸

@Homar888

26 күн бұрын

i play warthunder already can i still get the stuff

@ad633f5

26 күн бұрын

Dude it's a russian game! :) Think twice before taking money from russians.

@vonries

26 күн бұрын

Never forget all of the Russians who abused children and their families in Ukraine. From the mass graves (in Izium) to the stolen children. Now if parents don't become Russian citizens and go to flight against their brothers and cousins Russia will take their newborn children at birth. Speaking of Izium. What did those 414 people see? The Russians thought it was better to murder them and bury them all in a mass grave instead of letting them testify. Whatever they saw must have been truly horrific. If Russia want's to sign a treaty they must first prove they will stand by one. If Russia wants to negotiate, start with your original written agreement. Pull back all of their troops back behind their original boarder and then you can start negotiations. If they don't show they will honor the original agreement how can you expect them to honor any further agreements. It's our war to lose. Russia can NOT win. Unless we choose to not support Ukraine of course. It is on us in the global West to pick the world we want to live in. Choose wisely. Thanks. Glory to Ukraine. God Bless Ukraine and her people. 🇺🇦🇺🇸

If they don't call the upgraded Raptor the King Raptor, command and conquer fans will cry.

@karther1058

26 күн бұрын

Under Rated AS FUCK!..... Lets give em an airshow

@Ulysses-fy4sq

26 күн бұрын

​@@karther1058"Watch the skies, General."

@test-qz4dq

26 күн бұрын

China will grow larger

@DxD34234

26 күн бұрын

Damn, now that's fucking nostalgia

@alienbeef0421

26 күн бұрын

Give it that dark spine livery 🥵

"Would you intercept me ... I would intercept me."

@Excalibur01

26 күн бұрын

"I've had it with this air to air vegan diet!"

@dextermorgan1

26 күн бұрын

"I'd intercept me so hard" 😂

@jamesogden7756

26 күн бұрын

Let the upgraded kid EAT!

@rossanderson5815

26 күн бұрын

Kid needs a cape now.

@fulconandroadcone9488

26 күн бұрын

@@jamesogden7756 I'm now worried they might not be able to keep the kind in the hangar anymore.

I love when people say “The F22 is too old and too technologically deficient to keep in service; and the upgrades cost too much,” and then say “There’s absolutely nothing wrong with upgrading the F15 and F16 platforms and keeping them in the air until the 2050s,” when both of those first flew while we still had troops in Vietnam… Don’t get me wrong, the F15 and F16 are both legendary. But don’t tell me the F22 from 1997 is too old while the F15 and F16 first flew when rotary-dial phones were still a thing. FOH.

@Dubanx

26 күн бұрын

It makes more sense to just replace them with F-35s, though. Those are way more cost effective. F-22s are only marginally better at dogfighting while being many times more expensive. Meanwhile, F-35s can also replace strike aircraft, further bolstering their numbers. 2-3000x F-35s are just better than 700x F-22s at air superiority, while simultaneously offering far superior ground strike capabilities.

@knoll9812

26 күн бұрын

​@@Dubanxoptions F35 might not be that great against j32 F22 would have ffet a different threat. Like having two golf clubs instead of one.

@liljjbo17

26 күн бұрын

@@Dubanx The F-22 is only expensive because they canceled more then 2/3rds of the orders and blcoked it from export 750 orders to under 200 produced, the 35 costs less because they're making more then 15 times as many aircraft. Not to mention its a stealth aircraft thats not stealth when carrying air to ground ordenence and it cant even carry a lot so they're trying to extend the F-15 and F-16 life spans while simutaniously building more of them. The only thing the 35 has going for it is the Electronics suite and even then there's a chance the plane doesnt react to the pilots input upon landing which has been noted not only by pilots but by the plane itself in 3 or 4 crashes.

@kiabtoomlauj6249

26 күн бұрын

If you're talking about simple deadliness, no high-end fighter jet is not deadly, on pure speed and the ability to carry deadly missiles, even those from the rotary phone era. The F-15 is as powerful and fast as the F-22; and the latter could shoot down all current high end jets that the Russians and Chinese CURRENTLY have. (.... The reason we know the J-20 is not anywhere near the capability of the F-22 is the same reason we know the South Koreans cars, of the 1990s, were NOWHERE near the quality and sophistication of Japanese, American, and Western European cars of the 1990s.... It takes a few DECADES to catch up to people who've been building some specialized thing for MANY DECADES before you got started....) But we are talking about having AN EDGE over a "near-peer" competitor... We are talking about "RELATIVITY"... If you flew the mighty F-22 against the mid-size, mid-range (in the sphere of physicality) F-35, the mighty F-22 WILL BE SHOT DOWN. It doesn't matter how people who worship the mighty F-22 proclaim it is "the most deadly" fighter jet ever built. The F-35's computational and data processing capabilities are up to 30 times superior to the 1990s F-22. Some historical perspective: when the first 4 Cray Super Computers were made available to public research universities in the US, late 1980s/early 1990s --- one came to my alma mater, in San Diego; and the university had to build a giant 2-storie building to house & to cool it ---- the fastest super computational speeds were in the 3 to 5 G-FLOPS. Today, most of your high-end CELL PHONES could do up to the one T-FLOPS range. TECHNOLOGICALLY --- computationally, data link capability, avionics, "user sensor" (how the F-22 still operate with a helmet made for ANALOG screen), radar, etc --- the mid-range F-35 is about 25 years ahead of the mighty dog-fighting/interceptor F-22 from the 1990s. Anyway, HIGH-END MISSILES ---- both the smaller air to air missiles fighter jets carry and the much larger and faster ground to air they have ---- from all advanced nations don't really care how fast all high-end aircraft fly. You unknowingly fly a giant aircraft (Mach 1.5, Mach 2.5, etc) into a volley of Patriots, S-400, etc. and your chances of dying are very high.... because most high end air to air missiles travel between Mach 4 and Mach 6 and some high end ground to air missiles travel over Mach 10.

@jjjr.1186

26 күн бұрын

​​@@kiabtoomlauj6249f22 has double the radar range of f35. It has thrust vectoring. Better stealth by almost double over f35. The f22 Caries more missiles. And has supercruise. F35 was a cheap f22. The f22 would wipe any f35 from the sky. And why the military kept it top secret unlike f35.

11:45 LMAO. “Ever since sword combat, we’ve just been growing further and further apart. War is getting lonelier and lonelier”

Q: "Why spend to upgrade the F-22 when that $$ could be spent on the NGAD?" A: Because then we'll have upgraded F-22s AND NGAD.

@floofy5529

26 күн бұрын

F22's will likely be retired once NGAD's are deployed en mass. F22 upgrade is just supposed to be a stop gap so America doesn't have its pants down if China decides to invades Taiwan before a significant amount can be built to counter.

@GreenBlueWalkthrough

26 күн бұрын

@@floofy5529 I doudt it because NGAD is likely not made to do all the things the Raptor can like dogfight and point defense...

@gld1010

26 күн бұрын

@@floofy5529 Floofy is correct, it's to catch the F22 with recent advances. Missiles are catching up to with the AIM-260. I hope the NGAD is a combination of the F22/F35. Just because most engagements will be BVR, it doesn't mean the enemy can push into WVR. Making the same mistake that we did in Vietnam and didn't have guns. Granted, they are more advance and accurate now but nothing is 100%

@devildog1989

26 күн бұрын

​@floofy5529 yeah, given the military's history of failed programs and their delayed roll out, the F22 is gonna be here with us for a while longer

@prodigalsoniv48

26 күн бұрын

@@gld1010 the guns myth isn’t really all that true though The issue wasn’t the lack of guns but rather a lack of training with missiles After Top Gun was established, naval aviators were slaughtering the enemy with missiles and did better than the USAF pilots Technology always wins BUT it REQUIRES solid training and tactics too

I know this is random, but the United States lost their last triple fighter ace of world war 2. Brigadier General Bud Anderson. The man shot down 16 planes during world war 2, and flew along with the legend Chuck Yeager. Rest in peace Bud Anderson.

@kwiturbitchin5277

26 күн бұрын

He was also an F-105 squadron and wing commander who flew a combat tour in Vietnam!

@Homar888

26 күн бұрын

rest in peace ace

@kwiturbitchin5277

26 күн бұрын

He was also an F-105 squadron and wing commander who flew a combat tour in Vietnam!

@jackthorton10

26 күн бұрын

Rest in peace Ace

@ivanthemadvandal8435

26 күн бұрын

F

I like how America openly debates pros and cons of anything military related, whereas China and Russia: "Our ____ is perfection, the best thing ever, and can realign the planets."

@biggamejonnson3094

24 күн бұрын

I think that's what makes western militarys superior. Problems are discussed and addressed. Look at Russia, their leadership believed their own propaganda about it's military and then Ukraine happened. Not that the Russian military isn't capable but knowing ones shortcomings helps to compensate.

@Blodhelm

23 күн бұрын

That's why it was funny when he showed the Su-57 "Pipedream" as a threat. I get China is working on things with tech they stole from us, but Russian computer graphics and props that rust in the rain without electronics aren't exactly impressive.

@ex0duzz

21 күн бұрын

Name one thing or weapon that China has said is the best thing ever and better than usas. You can't name one except the ones that actually ARE superior, like certain hypersonic missiles. And that's mainly American generals etc who are saying it's superior. It's Americans who say China is a peer competitor, not China. Chinese don't brag or talk and are humble. It's Americans who's motto is Americans exceptionalism or America fuck yeah. Chinese let their actions do the talking otherwise they wouldn't even talk.

@worldoftancraft

21 күн бұрын

@@Blodhelm while the cornercut trophey wife «F-22» which can't really guide its AIM-120 and evade doing that, and doesn't have the third eye yet has PYLONS(Rimembah: stelf tiknologii, "myh reptor has less RCS than a bird"©)

@eugenenunn4900

19 күн бұрын

​@@ex0duzz hyper sonic missiles are their claims but they haven't proved the capability. They claim the J20 is better then the g22 and f35 so yes they overplay their hand, not as bad as the Russians though

I changed my mind about 22 to 35 times during this video.

We’re going to end up with fleets of B-52s and F-15s patrolling the hyperspace lanes.

@heartlessangel1460

26 күн бұрын

F-15EXS Space Interceptor

@makeachaininthecommentsect7953

26 күн бұрын

​@@heartlessangel1460 F-15EXSI

@DSNSGaming

26 күн бұрын

F-15X/WING

@stahlseuche

26 күн бұрын

Long live the BUFF!

@DonVigaDeFierro

26 күн бұрын

Space hen.

Shutting down the F-22 production line was a mistake that is on par with the Littoral Combat Ship program. Short sighted and naive cost savings strategies that didn’t pan out.

@ZOV24-2-22

26 күн бұрын

Littoral was horrid, it was plagued with issues before even reaching the sea

@bowencreer3922

26 күн бұрын

No. We and all our allies now have hundreds of the f35.

@Matthew-li7we

26 күн бұрын

​@@ZOV24-2-22Nah, the lessons learned from them will be worth their weight in gold in future warship design. Besides, I heard that the ones built are being considered to be converted into hypersonic missile cruisers.

@Rimasta1

26 күн бұрын

@@bowencreer3922F-35 was meant to operate with the F-22. The Raptor would sweep the sky while Fat Amy would sweep ground defense and strike targets. If the F-35 on its own was adequate, the USAF wouldn’t see the need to buy the F-15EX.

@rodneyjackson7147

26 күн бұрын

@@bowencreer3922 ya but its a multi role strike fighter.. our doctrine as always been to have a high end interceptor like the f14 15 and 22 and strike fighters usually more of a economic work horse. think f 16 and 18 they work well together. that decision left us with the f15 being our front line interceptor while its pushing 60 years old also it left us with few than 200 raptor for years before the f35 ever flew it was a short sighted cost saving measure. It also drove up the price of spare parts being that there are few of them. on top of all that it increases the use of each airframe making them fatigue rapidly.

Even if there are some older 22's that don't have all the new bells and whistles, that sounds like they need to be moved into training positions, to free up the ones currently being used for training to be moved into fighting squadrons. Yes the pilots will eventually need to train in the newer 22's but getting their feet wet on these older air-frames will keep the hrs down on newer air-frames. No point is dumping the older planes when they can play a role in keeping the newer planes ready for battle.

@CMDRSweeper

25 күн бұрын

The problem is that a lot of the Raptors that won't get the upgrade isn't due to cost. But a little bit of right to repair with lack of schematics for a few of the items and they have been victims of one of the WORST enemies out there that attacks and can kill any craft, both civilian and military, and can't be shot down. Rust / Corrosion... there are images out there where you can see the front of the canopy heavily rusted, and when you see the rust, it is usually a lot worse underneath. With the schematics gone, getting replacement parts is difficult, and the cost to fix would exceed developing something new, which is why the older ones are vanishing.

Point of clarification: they wanted to retire only the oldest raptors because they were not built in the same configuration as the majority of the fleet and it was going to be really expensive to bring them up to standard config. Also, they didn't go from wanting to retire the raptor fleet to upgrading it, they went from paying for the upgrades with the money saved by retiring the early production tails, to just inflating the budget even more/pulling money away from ngad.

2:17 Growling Sidewinder shout-out! Woot Woot!

@truthseeker9454

Күн бұрын

Good call out! I saw the one at 8:14 but missed that one. 😃

3:20 the cavemen in 1998 made me lol

@scratchy996

26 күн бұрын

As someone who lived back then, I can say it's an accurate description. People WERE more civilized and sophisticated back in those days.

@fredbyoutubing

26 күн бұрын

​@@scratchy996I think people's brain were more specialized and thus, focussed on important informations for their daily lives. People nowadays have access to all the information in the world and can't stay focused on one thing at a time. Now we need AI to compensate. Simpler people in simpler times.

@antoniobautista6718

26 күн бұрын

Haha same, even made my own comment about it. I think they actually intended to put it there 🤣🤣🤣

@skullhart

26 күн бұрын

IKR! I joined the USAF in 1998 and have been retired from service for over 5 years😂

@Jester-Riddle

26 күн бұрын

That was actually a forecast of life after WW3, or Weapons Technology available for WW4 ... ! ☹

The F-22 can NOT be launched from an aircraft carrier as depicted @ 4:55. It would launch from a nearby island base

@NeedsLessWedge

23 күн бұрын

Like guam, kadena (okinawa), misawa, yokota, osan, or another Allie nation. I still remember when raptors first showed up at kadena, along with patriot batteries. And the protestors and their raptor go home signs.

@DJSpoiledMilk17

20 күн бұрын

technically, it can be launched from one, but can't LAND on one

I distinctly remember when the F-22 was first announced that the word "modularity" was very prominent in all descriptions of the aircraft. They claimed that "future upgrades would be easy and cheap" because of the "advanced modularity" of the aircraft systems. Of course, this unicorn like "modularity" has been touted for almost all military systems since the move from bronze weapons to iron. The only system in which it has proven to be even somewhat true is the M-16/M-4 combat rifle system.

IRST is important because it provides passive tracking. Radar emissions can be seen by your target. IRST allows you to target an enemy without the enemy knowing.

@prodigalsoniv48

26 күн бұрын

True although Modern AESAs are often harder to detect

@aerobetamax6022

26 күн бұрын

No, not harder to detect, but harder to jam or disturb. Output effect is output effect and any semi-modern EW suite will detect and track it.

@mustang5132

26 күн бұрын

There are also radar modes which have been in use for a long time that are passive. Track while scan is one of those. It is possible to detect and lock onto a target using this passive method but it is not as precise.

@user-xp5id1kh4r

26 күн бұрын

@@Wargasm54 What "features" do the Russians "prominently on their aircraft"?

@korana6308

26 күн бұрын

@@user-xp5id1kh4r IRST

Oh! Your f22 is evolving! Your f22 has evolved into a f22 super raptor!

@eldritchmorgasm4018

26 күн бұрын

F-22: 😏 "This isn't even my final form!" Evolves even further into the F-22 King Rator from "C&C: Generals", just like that.

@chanahyingchan5070

25 күн бұрын

Consuming Super Steroids

@greatBLT

25 күн бұрын

"King Raptor ready for takeoff!"

Fun fact: The F-22 is actually designated the F/A-22 according to official designations and AFSC codes. I learned this when making some decisions mid-career.

@pfclumi

26 күн бұрын

Wow interesting 😮

@abqcrutch

23 күн бұрын

Huh! I was an IMIS Administrator at Holloman for 2 years. Learned something new today. Thanks!

To me the F22 is still the worlds best dedicated Air superiority fighter. It just never got a chance to meet a peer nut its presence alone scares others.

Retiring old fighter aircraft: sad Upgrading old fighter aircraft: CHAD Making new fighter aircraft: NGAD

@kutter_ttl6786

26 күн бұрын

This comment: RAD

@LongWalkerActual

26 күн бұрын

How long would it take for a NGAD to become operational?

@CoffeeAndPaul

25 күн бұрын

​@@LongWalkerActual, we are aiming for prototype testing by 2027 & initial production by 2030.

@LongWalkerActual

25 күн бұрын

@@CoffeeAndPaul So.... Operational development (fully equipped units) is when?

@Chancellor_dumb

22 күн бұрын

​@LongWalkerActual full integration probably 2040 maybe 2050 gonna take a minute to make the amount we want train pilots and work out any kinks

I like the range graph but it should be pointed out that the F-22 isn't carrier based. They have to take off and land in ally countries or be air refueled.

@TheRealAaronSmith

26 күн бұрын

In other words, it has effectively an infinite range.

@fredbyoutubing

26 күн бұрын

@@TheRealAaronSmith it is limited to specific airfields in the region. I'm not sure "infinite" is the right word when there are humans on board or the mission is time sensitive.

@smalltime0

26 күн бұрын

Yeah I was looking at it going "Yeap that famous carrier variant the US made"

@IndigoSeirra

26 күн бұрын

​@@TheRealAaronSmithBy that logic every single aircraft capable of aerial refueling has an infinite range.

@TheRealAaronSmith

26 күн бұрын

@@IndigoSeirra pretty well, yep. Assuming you have the logistics to support a 24/7 refueling schedule across multiple points of the world. Which the US has. At least in theory, maybe not in current practice.For some time now, the limiting factor has been pilot endurance. We need to eat, drink, sleep, and relieve ourselves eventually, and those issues can only be mitigated for so long on an aircraft.

other people dont realize that this is also a way to have a 5th gen test out tech for the NGAD this has been publicly stated by the airforce... the drop tanks will end up being used on the NGAD, IR tracking is planned for the NGAD so might as well test it on the F22

3:22 Dang, shoutout to Grug and his cave family from 1998 🤣🤣🤣

General Malcolm 'Ace' Grainger will ensure this project is a success. If not he can always get a good airline job.

@the5gen

25 күн бұрын

now i feel like reinstalling C&C Generals Zero Hour

My understanding of the new stealth fuel drop tanks and pylons for the F-22 is that BOTH the drop tanks AND pylons drop away from the aircraft when not needed, maintaining the original stealth characteristics of the F-22.

The fact that the F22 is already being considered for retirement is crazy.

Nice to see Growling Sidewinder getting a shout out.

@truthseeker9454

Күн бұрын

Yeah, he works so hard to create outstanding content. The dude's a class guy, too.

Cant believe you upload this just as i finish lunch.

@Rimasta1

26 күн бұрын

I just started mine.

@RobertCunningham-cw4bv

26 күн бұрын

Lol ! No doubt !

@tgs9740

26 күн бұрын

Don't you hate that. Sometimes.

@Booz2020

24 күн бұрын

Don't forget to take a DUMP 🤯

US Air Force: We need to retire these F-22s, they’re getting old. Also US Air Force: We’re upgrading the B-52s again. They never get old!

@GeoScorpion

Күн бұрын

Yeah, but if you really want to be a clown, introduce a fictitious Ukrainian, Mykola Smirnoff, who is the very first Ukrainian to be training on the F- or A/F-22 that, like the Stinger missile, the USA planned to scrap... The entire world including our allies would scream before they fact-checked.

This reminds me of when I used to work in the trucking industry, we would take older trucks, attach a smart box ( Vehicle Gateway )on to their engine, and the truck would go from just a mobile box to a complete communications and diagnostics smart unit, and I think it´s the better solution, if you need your units just to be smarter, you can add all those smart components externally.

@wayneabbott652

8 күн бұрын

Because a F22 is some much like a Semi truck

Aka the "Military contractor huge freaking bonuses" Act.

Awesome update T&P. One thing dough, IRST is a PASSIVE tracking system, unlike RADAR, and it is designed to track aircraft not ground targets.

Nice presentation. Great analysis.

Nothing average with this grunt 👍 Salute from the Netherlands ✌

At least the repair personnel can easily find common problems. That's why it's better to buy a vehicle model two or three years into production.

I enjoy your quick self deprecating humour, moving right back to the topic seamlessly.

Someone help me out with "radar cross section of a marble" vs. "would not establish air superiority in the pacific theater." I'm sure he's right about that... but damn the details of how that works must be deeper than just "we ran out of gas."

Expensive, but seems like a no-brainer.

Im loving these frequent uploads ,keep it up !

Thank you for using so much footage from Growling Sidewinder to demo jets on your content in general, his content is some of the best out there in the flight sim space, and he has more simulated hours in some of these jets than actual pilots. Glad to see my boy succeeding with his content as much as he is. Just a big fan who wants to see him get more subs (and sponsor money) so he can afford to spend more time making videos for us.

An operator drewski and Cappy Army team up? I am here for it

The Air Force was compelled to keep the Raptor by Congress because the AF had squandered billions on a aircraft they suddenly called “obsolete” and wanted more money for a clean sheet design.

@MrRinoHunter

25 күн бұрын

Just say special interest payed off the congress, Lockheed Martin

@j.f.fisher5318

24 күн бұрын

the F-22 is a compromise design to placate the fighter mafia, built around supermanuverability. But classic dogfights haven't been a thing since Vietnam.

@Blodhelm

23 күн бұрын

@@MrRinoHunter Lockheed gets plenty for a new design. The F-35 cost $1.2 trillion and they say it still needs reworking, like a second engine. Lockheed wins either way.

From what I read the irst sensor was left out after cost cuts and couldn’t be added later cuz it couldn’t be fit inside the airframe

The F22 upgrades seem well worth the cost. They are technologies already developed and available. IRST is necessary.

Secretary of Defense Gates killed the F-22 because he didn't think any competitors (China/Russia) could produce advanced fighters. He also clashed with Gen. Moseley over this issue, who fought to save the Raptor. Gates fired Moseley and killed the Raptor.

So is the King Raptor gonna be reality? I miss Command and Conquer Generals :(

comparing the types of upgrades a notional C model raptor would have vs what the C model 15 did have, these seem to be fairly linear upgrades. seems like exactly what you would want and expect the air force development folks to do. if we had gotten the full fleet, we may even have gotten an FB22. Wouldnt that have been a sick variant.

Considering the number of conflicts around the world right now, I would think keeping the Raptor is a no-brainer. Our pilots are already lethal with the Raptor.

The priority to upgrade is based on airframe life, SLEP overhaul timing, and the time-scale of the NGAD reaching deployment in serious numbers. They _have_ to overhaul them to keep flying them. And NGAD is maybe 2030 for beginning deployment, and closer to 2040 for fully deployed. So... they _have_ to overhaul them or not have an AS fighter. And it's a long road to being replaced still. So they're stacking an upgrade on the overhaul. The 11 billion is like half "necessary overhaul costs", half upgrades. They're not gonna have 186 of them though. About 50 of them are not air worthy now, and half of those probably never will be again. With the 11 billion, they'll have about 150 'working' jets. At any rate, it'll be "partially" caught up with the F-35. But still cost like $75,000/flight hour. I think the F-15 will get the AIM-260 first. It would benefit from it the most.

RIP Supersonic Bumblee Welcome to the World Supersonic Marble

Military Industrial Complex version of the Day 1 DLC.

Great video. 👍 Also just wanted to say I really like Cappy's goodbye, "Signing off this net, time now."

Thank you. Good clip.

Yeesaaaaaaahhhhh Operator Drewski x Cappy is the collaboration we need

You don’t cut the best air to air jet from your tires inventory cause you want to be cheap. Who knows when the 6th Gen fighter they are developing will finally come out. So do what you need to give the Raptor its upgrades to help improve its modern avionics and sensors.

@redrockengineer

25 күн бұрын

I wonder if there is a secret NGAD delay so AF decided the upgrades were required?

@j.f.fisher5318

24 күн бұрын

@@redrockengineer There could be delays, but the main thing is that 2030 is a really long way away when war with China could start practically at any time. If the war starts before NGAD can take over, then the F-22 is going to be our air superiority aircraft. Though probably if war looks likely they'll just keep the F-22 around a bit longer.

thank you

Supercruise does not mean what you think it means. It means that you can go nominally faster than sound without afterburners.

@j.f.fisher5318

24 күн бұрын

yeah, and conversely it works by using a low-bypass engine engine that performs more like a turbojet than a turbofan, which also makes it less fuel efficient because the bypass ratio is half that of the engines on the F-35, F-15, or F-16

Hell, F-8E Crusaders had IRST... OLD IRST but it was there...

@bualeegrasse2380

25 күн бұрын

The mighty F-106 also had IRST, plus TADIL A datalink.

The raptor is a flying sniper rifle.. now a super sniper rifle

@IndigoSeirra

26 күн бұрын

It's more of a flying ninja. Stealthy, highly maneuverable, and lethal against adversary aircraft. The F-35 would fit the sniper rifle analogy much better. It is mostly a long range/BVR focused aircraft, stealthy, and performs recon.

13:03 I recommend rechecking the hardpoints on the F22 for this graphic.

Love the GS footage. Glad you're a fan.

There is no way someone signed off on sticking air to air missiles on the fuselage right in front of the air intakes…. Right?..right?!

@rwdplz1

26 күн бұрын

The Generals from the Bradley program: "There's some space on the nose, just stick another couple missiles there."

@jimduffield7822

26 күн бұрын

This can’t be real 😂😂

@TheRealAaronSmith

26 күн бұрын

I think there's a few issues with how the missiles were displayed. As far as I understood, sidewinder were carried, ironically, in the side bays, where AMRAAMs or whatever would be in the belly. I don't see how or why they'd switch them around, just to have 2 sidewinders in that huge belly bay that can hold 6 AMRAAMs and 2 in the nose on top of that? Weird.

@heyasucks

25 күн бұрын

incorrectly modeled in the video, the 6 AMRAAMs are stored in the center bays and the sidewinders are in the side bays

@johnathonyoung4799

15 күн бұрын

Have you people ever seen a photo of the F22 it has a side door on each side for the aim-9 seperate from the big missile bay just google f22 missile bays open

A stealth "tank killer" or ground support aircraft would be so dope... and we could test it as a drone RIGHT NOW in a certian conflict where an ally doesnt have air dominance... seems like a necessity for near peer conflics where getting air superiority might not be quick or even possible...

@dumdumbinks274

23 күн бұрын

That's basically the F-35.

How they could even consider retiring the Raptor, is beyond my comprehension. This thing is so far ahead of its time. Glad they are upgrading it

Modern warfare: I have a new, pod. 😱 What is in the pod? 😉 Wouldn't you love to know.

The system of a system of 6th generation is a dream. The F22 has yet to be contended in air. No reason to keep progressing but no reason to stop current superiority

@joetamaccio9475

20 күн бұрын

It did shoot down a balloon !

Jeez you sure know how to make a guy feel old....back in 98 ....jeez

This is a great channel. Thanks Cappy!

THAT RAPTOR IS BETTER THAN ALL OTHER AIRCRAFTS!!

15:53 wait, I didn't knew Poland has a sixth gen fighter! :O

@knoll9812

26 күн бұрын

They do you just can't see it. It is so stealthy it deleted itself from all media.

@AndreasGassner

25 күн бұрын

on the bright side, finally not mistaken for Indonesia

Because we shouldn’t have ever stopped production of these bad boys

@deansmits006

26 күн бұрын

True, but it's very difficult to predict the future and they are spendy. Too bad, moving on

3:19, best photo choice ever.

Fun fact: any supersonic object will have it's leading edges heat up due to air friction. The addition of advanced IR targeting pods may be a feature to deal with a possible stealth opponent.

@shadowgunner69

20 күн бұрын

Find Col. Bruce Gordon's (Spirit of Attack) video about his flying an F-106 and performing a face-shot on a Bomarc with a closure rate of M4.

Should call it the dominus raptor

Another good down to Earth video. 👍

3:19 "All the way back in 1998" *Shows literal cavemen* LOL

That pop-in at 0:16 makes for a good representation of their interaction with that Iranian F-4

You’re making me addicted to your videos, Chris. Lol

They should build a fighter with no weapons, have them all be carried by a companion drone instead. If the drone uses up its weapons, just rendezvous with a fresh one.

@yupyup4209

26 күн бұрын

That's how the NGAD will be. Might just have a directed energy weapon on board for missle defense.

@yupyup4209

26 күн бұрын

This will also allow the NGAD to be super thin and stealthy.

@barrymccockiner6641

26 күн бұрын

If that's the direction, remove the internal bay for internal tanks. Or figure out stealthy CFTs

@keithrodrigues7508

25 күн бұрын

why not have 3 drones up at once you are on something and a couple AI drones at your 6 oclock just to be safe ! close air support for the ground assault drones your commanding .the AI drones to cover all 4 plos themselves your situational AWareness wil;l then be invincible... ask Tony Stark ,lol.

12:55 - You've got the weapons on the missile bays mixed up. The AIM-9X are on the side bays while the AIM-120D are on the middle bays.

The upgrades to the F-22 probably should have been done a few years ago as it was easy to project the new threats entering the theatre of combat from our adversaries. Plus, until another more advanced fighter is ready for serial production, the US must keep all of their existing aircraft as advanced as possible because you never know when another war might break out.

Th answer : the felon and the dragon got new engines. They are pretty good. We need to maintain our overmatch. Plus we have the harder mission out of the 3. So a better raptor would be nice

@jakesully2868

24 күн бұрын

All 8 Felons?

As a Mission Crew Commander Air Battle Manager on AWACS and a prior squadron commander on Okinawa, you forgot about that island. It's only 450 miles away from Taiwan and filled to the teeth with US forces.

@ex0duzz

21 күн бұрын

Which will be flattened in the first missile volley in any war with china.

@pike100

Күн бұрын

​@@ex0duzzPatriot battery says "hold my beer."

Any upgrade should increase its velocity thus making the new Raptor be called the Velociraptor

@ronclarke8546

26 күн бұрын

LOL

At 19 minutes in when he was talking about the feds "looking into your browser history" for getting a security clearance I honestly thought he was going to transition to, "and this secret clearance was brought to by NordVPN".

As expensive as the F-22 is to operate and as expensive as it would be to upgrade them, this is still vastly less expensive than NGAD and deliverable about a decade sooner. The most likely timeframe for a major war with a near peer adversary is highest from now to a decade from now. NGAD will not be able to help with such a conflict at all and will seriously degrade the capability of current forces for such a conflict by diverting funds to the future and sacrificing near term modernizations.

@josiechaney9010

25 күн бұрын

Perfect is the enemy of good, the adage says.

Interesting perspective, got me thinking!

@THE-X-Force

25 күн бұрын

Scammer.

6:50 Watching the turn that pilot is about to do is nothing short of mindboggling!

The IRST sensor was removed from the Raptor explicitly to keep avionics costs down as a cost cutting measure in the program.

Thanks for sharing Cappy

The thing they're not saying out loud is the numbers game, Chinese is ramping out a lot of military hardware right now, so from this to buying a bunch of new F15's, the USA is trying to ramp up its own military hardware volume.

@dave4882

26 күн бұрын

I remember a war game a while back. The US vs china. The givens were that every missile china fired missed. Every missile the US fired hit. The US lost. We didn't have enough planes/missiles. The Chinese fighters then took out all of our AWACS and tankers.

@yves2932

26 күн бұрын

@@dave4882 I suppose the distances involved will severly reduce availability of US jets near china. China has a natural advantage there. Even if you could 100% stopgap the fuel issue with tankers, the pilots cant stay in the air forever in some narrow fighter cabin. They're out of the game while they're making the long way back.

@Battl3Cry

26 күн бұрын

@@dave4882 Its just war games, scenario's in rl are vastly different. Otherwise you had that one war game where you put a US general with a bunch of ragtag iraq's and they achieve the same shit, killing seals, destroying destroyers and carriers etc. Basically put, impossible scenario's or just incredibly cheating. Its a good way to learn

@dave4882

26 күн бұрын

@Battl3Cry My point was basically that a few super weapons. No matter how good they are, will not win against a bunch of less than super weapons. Essentially, that's why the f16 exists.

@ToolofSociety

25 күн бұрын

@@dave4882 I'm going to need a citation for that war game as I'm unable to find anything resembling what you described.

There could be 2, rusty, moldy raptors left and the NGAD nanoseconds away from rolling off the line and people would STILL be simping for the F22 and demanding it be upgraded. People think the emotional attachment they have to things is of far greater importance to national security than objective reality.

@aneececolt

26 күн бұрын

in the scenario you describe, we would have literally no air dominance fighters. Imagine asking our adversaries to wait a few more years, until production is ramped up.

@prodigalsoniv48

26 күн бұрын

@@aneececoltthe thing is, the F-35 can fill this role en masse The F-35 already has better Radar/EW/frontal stealth giving it the edge in BVR so we’re fine in the meantime. We should prioritize 6th Gen

@TheRealAaronSmith

26 күн бұрын

@@prodigalsoniv48 that's only part of air superiority, and that's air superiority you're talking, not air DOMINANCE. There is a difference. The F-35 is great, but not perfect, and not good enough to almost depend on exclusively.

@alexandermagnus82

26 күн бұрын

​@@aneececoltChina has maybe around 200 J-20's, we have abou 450 F-35's and about 180 F-22's. With the next generation fighter rolling out, if we lose an engagement, I dont think it'll be because we dont have enough F-22's

@reubensandwich9249

26 күн бұрын

​@@aneececoltIs there anything out there better than the F-35's Block 4, or even in the next 10-20 years?

F-22 is a such a majestic jet, and it still has so much life left in it, so happy to see the much needed upgrades

Keep the Raptor and upgrade where you can, I think it scares most opponents

Why am I reminded of the (d)evolution of the F-16, from sleek lightweight dog fighter to laden precision-bombing platform? The U.S. can’t help making everything a bomber. From a cost-effectiveness standpoint, we should probably retire the entire concept of a fighter, with that entire AA function handed to drones and missiles.

@everettputerbaugh3996

26 күн бұрын

Relative to problems: "...We usually drop a bomb on it." -- Air Force General in Space Force the T.V. series.

@dumdumbinks274

23 күн бұрын

Hmm? The F-16 didn't transition from fighter to bomber. Bombs have just become more advanced, and being able to deliver bombs is a basic requirement of combat aircraft.

super raptor? so c&c generals, Zero hour was prophetic. edit: yeah it was actually king raptor

@Rimasta1

26 күн бұрын

King Raptor ready for take off!

@shaider1982

26 күн бұрын

​@@Rimasta1 my bad. yeah, it was king raptor, not super raptor. thanks for the correction.

Having a Super Raptor and NGAD sounds scary for the enemies in present and future

Great exploration of a difficult subject.