How the Mamluks Defended Against the Mongols - Medieval DOCUMENTARY

Фильм және анимация

Go to establishedtitles.com/Kings and help support the channel. They are now running a massive Black Friday Sale, plus 10% off on any purchase with code Kings. Thanks to Established Titles for sponsoring this video!
The Kings and Generals animated historical documentary series on Mongol History continues with a video explaining how the Mamluks defended against the Mongols. In our previous episode we discussed the European defence against the Mongol invasions ( • How the Europeans foug... )
Our podcast on Mongol history - kingsandgenerals.libsyn.com/2...
How the Mongol Empire Fell - • How the Mongol Empire ...
Lost History of Genghis Khan - • The Lost History of Ge...
Mongol Ideology - Why Chinggis Wanted to Conquer the World - • Mongol Ideology - Why ...
How the Mongols Became Muslim - • Why and How the Mongol...
Why the Mongols Tolerated Other Religions - • Why the Mongols Tolera...
Rabban Bar Sauma: Adventures of Mongol Marco Polo - • Rabban Bar Sauma: Adve...
Mongol Army - Tactics, Logistics, Siegecraft, Recruitment - • Mongol Army - Tactics,...
Is Genghis Khan Ancestor of the Millions? - • Is Genghis Khan Ancest...
What is the Truth about Tartaria: • What is the Truth abou...
Previous videos in our series on Mongol history - bit.ly/3eezUnW
Support us on Patreon: / kingsandgenerals or Paypal: paypal.me/kingsandgenerals or by joining the youtube membership: / @kingsandgenerals We are grateful to our patrons and sponsors, who made this video possible: docs.google.com/document/d/1o...
The video was made by Galang Pinandita, while the script was developed by Jack Wilson - The Jackmeister. Check out his channel dedicated to the history of the Mongols: / @thejackmeistermongolh... . This video was narrated by Officially Devin ( / @offydgg & / @gameworldnarratives )
✔ Merch store ► teespring.com/stores/kingsand...
✔ Patreon ► / kingsandgenerals
✔ Podcast ► kingsandgenerals.libsyn.com/ iTunes: apple.co/2QTuMNG
✔ PayPal ► paypal.me/kingsandgenerals
✔ Twitter ► / kingsgenerals
✔ Discord ► / discord
✔ Facebook ► / kingsgenerals
✔ Instagram ► / kings_generals
Production Music courtesy of Epidemic Sound: www.epidemicsound.com
#Documentary #Mongols #Mamluks

Пікірлер: 1 200

  • @pogo8050
    @pogo8050 Жыл бұрын

    >gets kidnapped as child by rival tribe > sold into slavery > goes through grueling training to become a loyal elite warrior >topples their new lord >takes over kingdom >successfully defends against the biggest empire of all time >kicks out the last crusaders >refuses to elaborate further >dies

  • @rwnin

    @rwnin

    Жыл бұрын

    😂😂

  • @arqamghaffar1996

    @arqamghaffar1996

    Жыл бұрын

    Refuses to elaborate part is the best one.

  • @yourroyalchungusness

    @yourroyalchungusness

    Жыл бұрын

    Didn't know Mamluks were that chads

  • @EM-tx3ly

    @EM-tx3ly

    Жыл бұрын

    Baybers He fits the description perfectly

  • @EM-tx3ly

    @EM-tx3ly

    Жыл бұрын

    @@aze94 Baibers prepared the groundwork for kicking the crusaders out Unlike Saladin He was very ruthless but efficient No mercy or quarters especially for military orders Even giving letters to defeated crusader leaders full of mockery and contempt of their defeats Man of the job

  • @GreasusGoldtooth
    @GreasusGoldtooth Жыл бұрын

    As someone who has had to deal with several Mongol invasions over the past few years, this series has been hugely helpful to me and my family.

  • @MyBuzzL

    @MyBuzzL

    Жыл бұрын

    I thought today mongol is conquered by china. which khan invade ur family?

  • @John-ir4id

    @John-ir4id

    Жыл бұрын

    Can't tell if you're being clever or racist...

  • @plebestrian9323

    @plebestrian9323

    Жыл бұрын

    @@John-ir4id As a mongol horse, I can confirm that it's definitely racism.

  • @GreasusGoldtooth

    @GreasusGoldtooth

    Жыл бұрын

    @@John-ir4id Don't worry, I'm just making a dumb joke about this series being about "how to defend against Mongol invasions." I've got no time for bigots of any kind. Being afraid of or angry at people who are different is stupid.

  • @BaalAdvocate

    @BaalAdvocate

    Жыл бұрын

    Aren't the ogre kingdoms basically mongols?

  • @Irfan87
    @Irfan87 Жыл бұрын

    The Mamluks are fairly underrated.

  • @sagagis

    @sagagis

    Жыл бұрын

    probably due to Ottoman conquest in 1516-17

  • @md.shaghilsubhani.1639

    @md.shaghilsubhani.1639

    Жыл бұрын

    @@sagagis yep

  • @fatihahenouze2036

    @fatihahenouze2036

    Жыл бұрын

    @UCnWkd5Hav-3WXFKAwkF1s8Q baybars ended them at the siege of krak de chevalier castle

  • @SousouCell

    @SousouCell

    Жыл бұрын

    Underated by who ....??

  • @SousouCell

    @SousouCell

    Жыл бұрын

    @@IStevenSeagal well thats because apart from the battle of ain jalout , wherevhe was a commander under the orders of QUTUZ ( WHOm he killed ), he focused his attention after the battle on the arménians and the crusaders who sided with the mongols , it was his successors who had to deal with a vengeful hulagu .....

  • @googane7755
    @googane7755 Жыл бұрын

    I wished KZreadrs stopped shilling for established titles, it's a literal scam.

  • @lordoblivion8038

    @lordoblivion8038

    Жыл бұрын

    Sadly it won't. Cause they won't get the succulent ad mons

  • @SxTxferlife

    @SxTxferlife

    Жыл бұрын

    Most didn't know it was a scam till recently, a very successful scam at that. I only hope that company gets ground to dust

  • @Darkcamera45

    @Darkcamera45

    Жыл бұрын

    @@SxTxferlife it’s a scam dam I didn’t know bro they’re getting good at these scams now a days

  • @thedude9461

    @thedude9461

    Жыл бұрын

    Why is it a scam?

  • @lordoblivion8038

    @lordoblivion8038

    Жыл бұрын

    @@thedude9461 I think it was that you don't get free land cause a. It is illegal and b some sort of legal reasons

  • @nenenindonu
    @nenenindonu Жыл бұрын

    Fun fact : Both Baibars and Qutuz had a common Turkic background, originating from lands that had been previously ravaged by Mongols, which were Cumania and Khwarezmia respectively. A shared fate and revenge

  • @Mysteriousman355

    @Mysteriousman355

    Жыл бұрын

    Arab bro and and Turk

  • @nenenindonu

    @nenenindonu

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Mysteriousman355 Arab ? Baybars originated from the Kipchak Turkic Berish tribe whereas Qutuz was a royal descented Oghuz Turk who had belonged to the Anushtegin Dynasty of the Begdili tribe (ruling house of the Khwarezmian empire)

  • @Nomadicenjoyer31

    @Nomadicenjoyer31

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Mysteriousman355 Arabs were nobody in the time of Crusades and Mongol Empire😂

  • @thewarriorfrog

    @thewarriorfrog

    Жыл бұрын

    @9/11 was done by bush Mamlūk authors almost always refer to their Sultanate as " the state of the Turks " ( dawlat al - atrāk dawlat al - turk/ al - dawla al - turkiyya ) . They usually seem to be aware of the fact that the reign of the “ Turks " Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam,Volume 39 Magnes Press, The Hebrew University., 2012

  • @ahmedkhaled8719

    @ahmedkhaled8719

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Mysteriousman355 they had turkic origins but i don't understand why are you arguing about that at their time race didn't matter

  • @m.meiburger1970
    @m.meiburger1970 Жыл бұрын

    Only can imagine how intense , quick and skilled the battle between two armies must had been , when they both were focused on cavalery combat range and melee since childhood . The level of expertise in any aspect of this conflict must had been unique .

  • @cool06alt

    @cool06alt

    Жыл бұрын

    It was like one of the rare instance of manuver warfare, sort of like how Blitzkrieg waged in WW2. Infantry being barely if almost irrelevant because the battlefield is much closer to area of operation spanning miles.

  • @yamazakiJumpei

    @yamazakiJumpei

    Жыл бұрын

    Isn't it technicaly "cammelry" ?

  • @SousouCell

    @SousouCell

    Жыл бұрын

    Welll not;really , mongols used primarly Light horse archers , while the mameluk were mostly formed from kipchak tribesmen and khwarezmian turks who had fled , or were enslaved , in the first mongols onslaught ..... the kiptchak for instance, although they were nomadic people from the caucus, their fighting style was closer to heavy cavalry ( lance and protected horse and horseman ), In Ain jalut it was the vanguard of heavy cavalry Led by baibars who clashed the mongol vanguard ( armenian and georgian vassals ) and drew the rest of the mongols in a feigned retreat ......

  • @aburoach9268

    @aburoach9268

    Жыл бұрын

    @@SousouCell mongol used primarily light horse archers only during the beginning of their conquests, But as they steadily acquired more loot and wealth, they become mostly Heavy horse archers, the Bow still remained their main weapon and the same goes for Mameluke heavy cavalry which also used bows in conjunction with their lances, shields and swords / Both armies mostly consisted of heavy cav that could also shoot arrows

  • @bilalkafa7856

    @bilalkafa7856

    Жыл бұрын

    Because central asia people kept fighting each other all the written history, I dont think it was uniqe. Scale of the armies were not uniqe either.

  • @hallaldude3478
    @hallaldude3478 Жыл бұрын

    I think the most strategically important reason that made the mamluks win was that they watched a kings and generals video before battle.

  • @Mysteriousman355

    @Mysteriousman355

    Жыл бұрын

    😂😂

  • @abcd9283

    @abcd9283

    Жыл бұрын

    😁💪😁

  • @thalmoragent9344

    @thalmoragent9344

    Жыл бұрын

    Imagine going back in time and uniting the locals of a region like the mamluks to just flex on the Mongols in a way they're not expecting 👀

  • @isseabdirahmanweheliye9010

    @isseabdirahmanweheliye9010

    Жыл бұрын

    @@thalmoragent9344 we have that in Hollywood.

  • @blablableh724
    @blablableh724 Жыл бұрын

    Baybars was clearly a military genius.

  • @abdaalahmad5483

    @abdaalahmad5483

    Жыл бұрын

    It would be an understatement if you knew what a life he lived.

  • @kalt4689

    @kalt4689

    Жыл бұрын

    First of all, “Barbarians”.. Second of all, they were way more intelligent than anyone else at that time, apparently. Third, “Barbarians” is a European monarchy that came up with the term to look down on people who are different than them. Yet, they were getting executed left & right by Mongols 😂

  • @sohype6827

    @sohype6827

    Жыл бұрын

    @@kalt4689 Baybars is the name of the military commander, he's not talking about the Amazigh people.

  • @Neonwebb

    @Neonwebb

    Жыл бұрын

    @@kalt4689 Big oof my guy.

  • @blakesexton2258

    @blakesexton2258

    Жыл бұрын

    @K Alt that is not at all where the term barbarian comes from

  • @abdallaha92
    @abdallaha92 Жыл бұрын

    As someone who has studied Mamluk history of a decade, this video is.....perfect. You included virtually every important aspect of the Mamluk-Ilkhanate war. A few interesting details: When the Abbasid Caliph al-Mustansir II was on his ill-fated campaign, he ended up meeting another "Caliph", Al-Hakim I, and they ended up joining forces. Al-Hakim ended up taking refuge in Egypt, becoming Baybar's puppet Caliph. In terms of the use of spies, Baybars had once gotten Abaqa to execute one of his loyal commanders by fooling him into thinking he was a traitor. In the 1500s, Ismail I had executed the leader of the Crimean Tatars, and sent it to Sultan Ghawri. The move deeply offended the Mamluks, as they had considered them to be the successors of the Golden Horde, who was remembered as deep allies 200 years ago.

  • @DDKKAY

    @DDKKAY

    Жыл бұрын

    The Mamluks of the year 1500 were mostly Circassians (Cherkess)

  • @fab-freshaquaponicbiospher6335

    @fab-freshaquaponicbiospher6335

    Жыл бұрын

    Baybar's letter to Berke: Bro, Allah hu Akbar Berke to Baybar: hmmmmm . But truth to be told,it is so beautiful that slaves were so well treated by Muslims that the Slaves rose to Level of Elites.. And were even seen humanely enough by other Lords and Elites to support these Slaves in overthrowing the Ruling Kings and Lords... . In Feudal Europe, a Slave was never allowed to educate himself.. Let alone sit with Lords and gain their support and respect..

  • @ibrahimyilmaz4861

    @ibrahimyilmaz4861

    Жыл бұрын

    @@fab-freshaquaponicbiospher6335 plain disrespectful.

  • @SlavaSlavenima

    @SlavaSlavenima

    9 ай бұрын

    @@fab-freshaquaponicbiospher6335 they had more than one type of slave in the Muslim world

  • @orkunyucel3095

    @orkunyucel3095

    8 ай бұрын

    Both armies had mainly good mounted archers and good light and heavy cavalry. The Mamluk Sultanate was ruled by Turkic Kipchaks and Caucasian Circassians. The army was made mainly of these two groups. The Mamluk Sultanate is the successor of the Ayyubid Sultanate, which is also of Turkic origin. In those years, Turkic Kipchak youth and Caucasian Circassian youth were enslaved in Central Asia and Eurasia during Mongol attacks and sold as slave soldiers to some countries in the Middle East. The Turkic Ayyubid Dynasty used these Turkic Kipchak and Caucasian Circassian youth in their armies after training them in a good military school. The Ayyubid army consisted mainly of these two groups. In the beginning, Turkic groups were much more. However, these soldiers had taken over the sultanate after a coup d'etat and established the Mamluk Sultanate. The word Mamluk means 'Slave' in Arabic. The language of agreement in the Mamluk Sultanate was Western Turkish, a mixture of Kipchak and Oghuz. In the past, only Arabic and Persian education was given in Madrasahs and Turkish was not a language taught in Madrasahs. For this reason, if someone in the Middle East speaks Turkish or writes in Turkish at that time, that person is Turkish. This is a litmus paper for understanding that period. "Kitâbu Bulgatü'l-Müştâk Fî Lügati't-Türk Ve'l-Kıfçak" , "Kitâbü'l-Ef'al" and "Kitâb-ı Mecmû-ı Tercümân-ı Türkî and Acemî ve Mugalî” are some examples written in Mamluk Kipchak language.

  • @Warmaker01
    @Warmaker01 Жыл бұрын

    The assassination of Qutuz after his smashing victory of Ain Julut really is shocking. He never got the chance to use it as a springboard for later actions and gaining more prestige since he was killed not long after the battle. The power struggle and mistrust while in power, the "game" never ends.

  • @khadaareofficial7992

    @khadaareofficial7992

    Жыл бұрын

    I think mongols woulda rule the if there was no Qutuz

  • @AntonNb

    @AntonNb

    Жыл бұрын

    I think it's a culture from Turks... ottoman sultan also eliminate their own family up till suleman ..it's harsh but it's effective way to prevent power struggle in future

  • @teukufadel8293

    @teukufadel8293

    Жыл бұрын

    @@AntonNb just look at the Mughal war of sucessions

  • @PLayAshEFF72

    @PLayAshEFF72

    5 ай бұрын

    Allah gave him victory then shortly after let him rest, and God willing he has earned his place in Paradise. Arguable the most important Battle in Islamic history after the early Muslim battles.

  • @StuffyMc
    @StuffyMc Жыл бұрын

    The mamluks are perhaps the most interesting historical fighting force to me. Their armor being stunningly beautiful and their huge variance throughout their time in social status, from slaves to kings, is so damn engaging to learn about.

  • @mencot89

    @mencot89

    4 ай бұрын

    yeah. they are underrated at least in modern world. they should have make movies of them. i know i'd watch it

  • @s.omarhassan2560
    @s.omarhassan2560 Жыл бұрын

    Thank you K&G for this video about an under explored area of our history.

  • @ahmeda6591
    @ahmeda6591 Жыл бұрын

    Bybars has married Berke's daughter as a sign of their alliance, so it is unlikely that Berke viewed the Mamluks as lower in rank or believed that they were his subjects

  • @TheJackmeisterMongolHistory

    @TheJackmeisterMongolHistory

    Жыл бұрын

    That's exactly what the Mongols would do. Such marriage ties were common means the Mongols used to try and ensure submission of their vassals; Berke also tried to arrange marriage ties with the Hungarians for this purpose.

  • @ahmeda6591

    @ahmeda6591

    Жыл бұрын

    @@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory guess we conceive things differently nowadays then. I'm a fan of your channel btw

  • @khadaareofficial7992
    @khadaareofficial7992 Жыл бұрын

    Qutuz knew letting Baibars back to Egypt would not only put risk to his power of possession, but also his life and he still choose to defend the umah no matter what. What a guy 🤌🏾

  • @mahmoudnh9690
    @mahmoudnh9690 Жыл бұрын

    as a man who was born and raised In the small town of Krak des chevaliers, I felt kinda proud when it got mentioned since this is the first time I have seen it in a historical video

  • @Gadanfer
    @Gadanfer Жыл бұрын

    ‏و مِن أعْجبِ العَجَب .. تَهديدُ الليوثِ بالرُّتوث .. و السباعِ بالضِباع .. و الكُماتِ بالكِراع .. لا يصدَعُ قلوبَنا شديد .. و جَمعُنا لا يُرَاعُ بتهديد .. بقوةِ العزيزِ الحميد .. - سيف الدين قطز

  • @brokenbridge6316
    @brokenbridge6316 Жыл бұрын

    Baybars more than anyone else in history probably had the best strategy in fighting the Mongol threat. One that the Europeans sadly didn't take to heart.

  • @Abdullah_the_Palestinian

    @Abdullah_the_Palestinian

    6 ай бұрын

    The Hungarians did

  • @brokenbridge6316

    @brokenbridge6316

    6 ай бұрын

    @@Abdullah_the_Palestinian---Explain. Please.

  • @Abdullah_the_Palestinian

    @Abdullah_the_Palestinian

    6 ай бұрын

    @@brokenbridge6316 they built a network of fortresses with catapults that where near each other. Each time the Mongols would besiege one fortress a relief force from another would Sally out in sorties.

  • @brokenbridge6316

    @brokenbridge6316

    6 ай бұрын

    @@Abdullah_the_Palestinian---If you insist

  • @ManjeetSingh-ko6tj
    @ManjeetSingh-ko6tj Жыл бұрын

    Clicked the video within 10s after the upload . No second thoughts for k&g. Always the best👌

  • @MrMacavity
    @MrMacavity Жыл бұрын

    Awesome work as always 👍 always nice to see more videos and history

  • @yaqubonnet
    @yaqubonnet Жыл бұрын

    Superb! As always K&G never disappoints!

  • @ataranaoahakaraaf3786
    @ataranaoahakaraaf3786 Жыл бұрын

    he was truly great strategic and tactic warrior-king named baibar the egyptian-mamluk with northern-steppe-origins to come so far from a slave-child to a king to defeat the mongols is just a impressive deed.

  • @MongoIndyleo
    @MongoIndyleo Жыл бұрын

    Hey K&G! People have already been complaining about this but I assume you have some kind of contract with Established Titles that you can't get out of. I hope you drop this as soon as you can! You guys have had tons of sponsors so I bet you can find someone to replace ET pretty easily. Also, just so you know, the Japanese knives box thing that I've seen going around is owned by the same people that own ET. I think this is less of a scam since you still actually get real knives but I might cut ties with them simply to not encourage anybody with shady products.

  • @blockmasterscott

    @blockmasterscott

    Жыл бұрын

    I was about to bring this up, ET is getting a pretty bad rep for scamming.

  • @xKinjax

    @xKinjax

    Жыл бұрын

    @@MintyLime703 i don't think it's a difference in contracts, i think these videos are just made a month or more in advance to begin with and the ads are already paid for. They're not gonna go back through them all to edit out the ads and send the money back.

  • @xKinjax

    @xKinjax

    Жыл бұрын

    The knives are a scam as well, they're just generic knives made in China, not Japan as advertised, bought for a few dollars each and then resold at a huge profit. There's been videos about the knife scam around for a while now but people just care about their own pocket, they don't care if their viewers are getting scammed.

  • @fintonmainz7845

    @fintonmainz7845

    Жыл бұрын

    @@xKinjax They would if they were honest.

  • @hanooi7450
    @hanooi7450 Жыл бұрын

    That was quite the Go match played by Baybars against the Ilkhanate. He managed to reinforce his positions while surrounding the Ilkhan with the Golden Horde.

  • @iamyourfather9391
    @iamyourfather9391 Жыл бұрын

    Has there been a video on the Chinese defenses against Mongols? The 60 year campaign against the Mongols in Sichuan is very interesting and deserved remembering- it costed Mongke Khan his life against Chinese cannons. If there already is a video on it please help guide me to it :)

  • @IreliAmBad

    @IreliAmBad

    Жыл бұрын

    There's a KZread channel called "strategy stuff" you might like. He has a video on the mongol conquest of china, with the strategic considerations of both sides. And another video on the older steppe peoples with a VERY indepth analysis on Chinese strategy against them.

  • @IreliAmBad

    @IreliAmBad

    Жыл бұрын

    Neither really deal with mongke. But figured I'd mention it regardless.

  • @iamyourfather9391

    @iamyourfather9391

    Жыл бұрын

    @@IreliAmBad Alright I'll check that out, thanks!

  • @ahmetsagay3137

    @ahmetsagay3137

    Жыл бұрын

    🙌🙌🙌

  • @weaver1507

    @weaver1507

    Жыл бұрын

    Lol his name was monkey Khan 🐒 lol 😂.

  • @Nomadicenjoyer31
    @Nomadicenjoyer31 Жыл бұрын

    On the other hand, as has been recently pointed out, though the beginning of Bahri rule is usually dated to 1250, none of the first five sultans were, in fact, members of the Bahriyya. 32 The Arabic sources for the period refer to the dynasty as the dawlat al-atrak, dawlat al-turk, or al- dawla al-turkiyya (i.e. dynasty of the Turks), in recognition of the racial or ethnic group which predominated in the mamluk caste during this period, and to distinguish it from the Burji sultanate in which mamluks Northrup, L. (1998). The Bahrī Mamlūk sultanate, 1250-1390. In C. Petry (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Egypt (The Cambridge History of Egypt, pp. 242-289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • @TheJackmeisterMongolHistory

    @TheJackmeisterMongolHistory

    Жыл бұрын

    How is it that there is always someone who arrives on these videos to immediately copy/paste sections like these? Do you just have them on hand in a document whenever a relevant videois posted? Do you find them from older videos?

  • @Nomadicenjoyer31

    @Nomadicenjoyer31

    Жыл бұрын

    @@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory Some people do advanced research on google books/Jstor/google scholar and share those sources via discord/telegram/instagram etc.

  • @tatarcavalry2342

    @tatarcavalry2342

    Жыл бұрын

    @@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory Turkish source paste team you can find them nearly at all videos about turks and there is a guy named van dare who tries to deturcify ottomans he is at every single ottoman video lol

  • @Nomadicenjoyer31

    @Nomadicenjoyer31

    Жыл бұрын

    @@tatarcavalry2342 Van Dare/Vangelis Skia is extremely jealous/angry about the entire Turkic vs Hellenic topics

  • @TheJackmeisterMongolHistory

    @TheJackmeisterMongolHistory

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Nomadicenjoyer31 I am glad at least, there are people other than myself who have read the Cambridge history series

  • @penguasakucing8136
    @penguasakucing8136 Жыл бұрын

    I love how J.M. Smith titled his article on this: "Nomads on Ponies vs. Slaves on Horses"

  • @tedhubertcrusio372

    @tedhubertcrusio372

    Жыл бұрын

    You mean slaves on stallions?

  • @penguasakucing8136

    @penguasakucing8136

    Жыл бұрын

    Ask J.M. Smith who wrote the hilarious title. But yeah it rhymes better. Either way, Mamluks sourced their horses from Al-Barqa (Cyrenaica), and fine steeds they are

  • @olegnoleg8158
    @olegnoleg8158 Жыл бұрын

    i find it astonishing that the mongols throughout the entirety of its empire's life has almost fought everyone known in the civilized world. they fought from japan to india, from china to russia, and from egypt to vietnam. amazing.

  • @andanandan6061

    @andanandan6061

    Жыл бұрын

    They went as far as Malay & Indonesia but they got defeated or maybe the correct word is they were deceived and back stabbed. Local ruler use Mongol troops to kick out Mongol troops. That may sound crazy but that is what happent

  • @garydrawsandpaints7745
    @garydrawsandpaints7745 Жыл бұрын

    Holy Moly!! I’m enthralled at the strategy and narrative AND THEN! That Homicidal Satanic Eskimo shows up at 11:55 and I was so scared I couldn’t focus on anything else. What were you folks in the art department thinking of anyways?

  • @WastelandRegis
    @WastelandRegis Жыл бұрын

    My Saturday morning routine is to make coffee and watch your channel. Love your videos. Keep up the fantastic work!

  • @rolex6170
    @rolex6170 Жыл бұрын

    i refreshed my memory of the mamluks from ur video. thanks! i cud recollect much of it and yes ur references as always are correct

  • @Mirko1913
    @Mirko1913 Жыл бұрын

    Hats off to Kings and Generals! With love, from Bulgaria

  • @goldeneaglepower9845
    @goldeneaglepower9845 Жыл бұрын

    Beibairs was kypshak origin, Ketbuga was naiman origin. Both are highly praised among Kazakhs, because Beibars sultan was born in their stepps and Kypshaks are backbone of Kazakhs. Kazakhs also have a great folk melody called Aqsaq Qulan (crippled foal), about how the death of Jochi happened. When Genghis Khan heard that melody played by Ketbuga, he understood that his son was dead. The thing is, Genghis Khan told that any messenger who would tell him about death of his sons, would be killed immediately, and everyone was silent about the death of Juchi, but Ketbuga risked and played that melody without words, by the end Genghis was full of tears.

  • @Nomadicenjoyer31

    @Nomadicenjoyer31

    Жыл бұрын

    Turkic vs Mongolized Turkic😅 Naiman was a Siberian Turkic language before Mongolization and Kipchakization

  • @orton4357

    @orton4357

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Nomadicenjoyer31 Doesn't matter, mongols and turks derive from one roots the main difference is linguistics

  • @user-wp7kg6qw1g

    @user-wp7kg6qw1g

    Жыл бұрын

    Dude stop your kazaksness. Kazak did not exist as a nation. Baibars was cuman, he was described like white man with blondish hair with blue eyes. Kazakh dont have any blondes. Kazakhs were not even muslim when they were raiding islamic world with mongols. Baibars would be closer to tatars, bashkirs, kumyks.

  • @goldeneaglepower9845

    @goldeneaglepower9845

    Жыл бұрын

    @@user-wp7kg6qw1g Why do you made so aggressive comment? I just mentioned few things that I know. You need to be more constructive in your criticism. Kazakhs did exist at that point there some genetic evidences, developed in recent years. Thats why I highlighted that Kyphcaks are backbone of Kazakhs. Look at kazakhs, they look abosulutely different from one another. There ginger dudes with blue eyes, at the same time you can find pure mongolic features or even arabic, iranian features. So your point on kypchaks were white not really clear. Kyivan Rus principalities docs describes kypchaks as unity of different looking people. It might be also true that Kypchaks also backbone of Bashkirs and Tatars, but they were different tribes. Kumyks were predominantly different tribes, they coexisted with Kypchaks, perhaps they lived in north Caucasus region long before Mongols arrived. Ketbuga is a legend of naimans, majority of whom became a part of Kazakhs, and then Kyrgyz and Uzbek people. But only among Kazakh naimans Ketbuga remains for such a long time. Do your homework before being offensive for no reason.d

  • @user-wp7kg6qw1g

    @user-wp7kg6qw1g

    Жыл бұрын

    @@goldeneaglepower9845 just dont get it. You guys feel pride about Gengiz khan that he was or he may have been kazakh who killed million of muslims yet again feel pride about a muslim who won against them. Bro stop bullshit. The current kazakhs are 80-90% mongoloid. You guys dont have iranian or european appearance unless person mixed up with russians, germans, caucasian, uzbeks, uygurs.

  • @mikemodugno5879
    @mikemodugno5879 Жыл бұрын

    A K&G video almost every day this week! Could it get any better?

  • @ckaiborbor
    @ckaiborbor Жыл бұрын

    Freakin’ love you guys. Thanks as always 🙏🏾

  • @beachboy0505
    @beachboy0505 Жыл бұрын

    Excellent video 📹 A COMPREHENSIVE VIDEO FOR A SATURDAY AFTERNOON.

  • @sayuas4293
    @sayuas4293 Жыл бұрын

    Baybars was a genius level general and statesman, he is totally underrated and belongs up there with Saladin

  • @ElBandito
    @ElBandito Жыл бұрын

    Pre-gunpowder era, the only way to reliably defeat the Mongols on the field was to swiftly engage them with heavy cavalry and force a melee fight. Kinda like how Otto I won against the Magyars in the Battle of Lechfeld.

  • @aburoach9268

    @aburoach9268

    Жыл бұрын

    No, you need to surprise and ambush them while quickly closing the distance or trapping them, Or else they'll destroy your heavy cavalry with arrow volleys while keeping their distance / You cannot beat them with just heavy cav in a conventional sense unless you have horse archer heavy cav of your own which the mamelukes had

  • @liamjm9278

    @liamjm9278

    Жыл бұрын

    @@aburoach9268 Arrows don't penetrate heavy armor.

  • @batsman27

    @batsman27

    Жыл бұрын

    @@aburoach9268 well ambushes would work against pretty much any army

  • @aburoach9268

    @aburoach9268

    Жыл бұрын

    @@liamjm9278 they do penetrate heavy armor depending on the poundage, arrow weight and distance of shot, the limbs are never that well protected as the chest and helmet + plate wasn't common during that period and even if it was, only the breast plate, vizor and helmet would be arrow proof Horses often are not armored and even with armor the legs still remain vulnerable

  • @aburoach9268

    @aburoach9268

    Жыл бұрын

    @@batsman27 that's exactly why one is supposed to use them against the mongols

  • @Uzair_Of_Babylon465
    @Uzair_Of_Babylon465 Жыл бұрын

    Fantastic video keep it up your doing amazing job

  • @yousseph777
    @yousseph777 Жыл бұрын

    The music/ background sounds, excellent!

  • @PristianoPenaldoSUIIII
    @PristianoPenaldoSUIIII Жыл бұрын

    As someone playing the medieval 2 total war campaign, this video has been very helpful.

  • @claudiapalermo9793

    @claudiapalermo9793

    Жыл бұрын

    Which faction did you choose?

  • @PristianoPenaldoSUIIII

    @PristianoPenaldoSUIIII

    Жыл бұрын

    @@claudiapalermo9793 turks 🗿

  • @khadaareofficial7992
    @khadaareofficial7992 Жыл бұрын

    I Hope you could’ve talked more bout Qutuz, because he’s the man who defeated them. Of course Baibers was a huge boost, but Qutuz‘s words and the famous speach he made was what make the people face the mongols fearlessly.

  • @calidone7661

    @calidone7661

    Жыл бұрын

    as far as i know battle tactic in ain jalut came from baibars

  • @craighaynes5885
    @craighaynes5885 Жыл бұрын

    History is so mighty.

  • @ucraniaestamosjuntos326
    @ucraniaestamosjuntos326 Жыл бұрын

    Great Work!

  • @okanisiert
    @okanisiert Жыл бұрын

    How can we describe Sultan Baibars? IMAGINE SHOOTING A MAN WITH YOUR LAST BULLET AND HE STANDS THERE UNPHASED!!!!

  • @Nomadicenjoyer31
    @Nomadicenjoyer31 Жыл бұрын

    The Mamlūks in Egypt and Syria: the Turkish Mamlūk sultanate (648-784/ 1250-1382) and the Circassian Mamlūk sultanate (784-923/1382-1517) amalia levanoni The Turkish era of the Mamlūk sultanate The Mamlūks’ rise to power: a decade of trial and error The Arabic term mamlūk literally means ‘owned’ or ‘slave’, and was used for the white Turkish slaves of pagan origins, purchased from Central Asia and the Eurasian steppes by Muslim rulers to serve as soldiers in their armies. Levanoni, A. (2010). The Mamlūks in Egypt and Syria: The Turkish Mamlūk sultanate (648-784/1250-1382) and the Circassian Mamlūk sultanate (784-923/1382-1517). In M. Fierro (Ed.), The New Cambridge History of Islam (The New Cambridge History of Islam, pp. 237-284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • @scourgeofgodattila579

    @scourgeofgodattila579

    Жыл бұрын

    Jalal Al-Din Mangburni defeated the Mongols 11 times. Jalal Al-Din>Alauddin Khilji+Baibars

  • @husseinboulahlib2839

    @husseinboulahlib2839

    11 ай бұрын

    White Turkish slaves ??? , Arabs always mentioned the Turkic tribes as brown looking people .

  • @Lord_Retrospect
    @Lord_Retrospect Жыл бұрын

    best ad copy ever , big ups yourself

  • @jeremychau2322
    @jeremychau2322 Жыл бұрын

    Baybars was such a great sultan

  • @MarouenAK

    @MarouenAK

    Жыл бұрын

    @@daniel_bart turks were slaves of everyone at that time

  • @Dieter-Doeddel
    @Dieter-Doeddel Жыл бұрын

    Could you do an Established vs Titles video next? 🤗

  • @markusskram4181
    @markusskram4181 Жыл бұрын

    Another fascinating video !

  • @thewarriorfrog
    @thewarriorfrog Жыл бұрын

    Then, on 3 September 1260, the Mongol forces met the army of the Egyptian Mamluks at the Spring of Goliath ('Ayn Jaliit) north of Jerusalem. The Mongol army contained a large admixture of Turks. The ethnic composition of the Mamluk army was very similar, in that it was mostly recruited from Turkish and Caucasian slaves, who had been purchased, trained and emancipated, whence the name: mamluk, 'possessed'. Spuler, B. (1977). The disintegration of the caliphate in the east. In P. Holt, A. Lambton, & B. Lewis (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Islam (The Cambridge History of Islam, pp. 141-174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • @scourgeofgodattila579

    @scourgeofgodattila579

    Жыл бұрын

    Jalal Al-Din Mangburni defeated the Mongols 11 times. Jalal Al-Din>Alauddin Khilji+Baibars

  • @meta196

    @meta196

    Жыл бұрын

    m̲o̲n̲g̲o̲l̲s̲ ̲h̲a̲d̲ ̲p̲l̲e̲n̲t̲y̲ ̲o̲f̲ ̲c̲h̲r̲i̲s̲t̲i̲a̲n̲s̲ ̲a̲c̲t̲u̲a̲l̲l̲y̲

  • @meta196

    @meta196

    Жыл бұрын

    m̟o̟n̟g̟o̟l̟s̟ ̟h̟a̟d̟ ̟p̟l̟e̟n̟t̟y̟ ̟o̟f̟ ̟c̟h̟r̟i̟s̟t̟i̟a̟n̟s̟ ̟a̟c̟t̟u̟a̟l̟l̟y̟

  • @ElBandito
    @ElBandito Жыл бұрын

    K&G continues to provide us valuable knowledge in an entertaining form, without costing us anything.

  • @MasterMalrubius

    @MasterMalrubius

    Жыл бұрын

    Why not support them?

  • @ElBandito

    @ElBandito

    Жыл бұрын

    @@MasterMalrubius I will definitely do that.

  • @iamleoooo
    @iamleoooo Жыл бұрын

    Berke: hmm... It's good to be a muslim and a mongol Hulagu: hmm... It's good to burn Baghdad to ash Berke: YOU WHAT?!

  • @muhammadalrubah8672
    @muhammadalrubah8672 Жыл бұрын

    Bahriya Mamluks actually means in arabic ( Naval Mamluks ) because their fort in cairo was on the shores of an area called Aljazeera which also means the Island

  • @-RONNIE
    @-RONNIE Жыл бұрын

    Thanks for a good video

  • @sk1ppercat912
    @sk1ppercat912 Жыл бұрын

    I’m assuming they focused on defending against an early archer rush. Then used there market bonus to get up to castle fast. Then attempted to stop the mongols from getting too many castles up and getting to a death ball of mangudai. As they have a bonus against siege rams don’t work well so again using there bonuses to get up to imp and start Trebbing down the castles.

  • @Ifyoucanreadthisgooglebroke
    @Ifyoucanreadthisgooglebroke Жыл бұрын

    The specifics here are hard to incorporate into late game strats, just gonna stick to making more Mameluks(sp) to counter the Mangudai.

  • @tedhubertcrusio372

    @tedhubertcrusio372

    Жыл бұрын

    Mongol stans in AoE2: *screaming internally as their Town center gets rekt by Saracen scorpions and Teuton trebuchets, while the Franks sit pretty in their farms, farming resources with the Spanish*

  • @perrytran9504

    @perrytran9504

    Жыл бұрын

    @@tedhubertcrusio372 If it's AoE 2 they'd all just be raging at the Franks player the whole game for being OP. Spanish and Saracens both cry at being underpowered after they die early, Teutons loses despite his deathball because he's a noob who doesn't know how to protect his siege onagers, Mongols got knocked out slightly earlier because he failed to make full use of his insane dark age and sputtered out in castle age.

  • @arda213

    @arda213

    Жыл бұрын

    Aoe2 unfortunately is so vague as a history game. Mamluks are sword throwing Arabic speaking camelry.

  • @TheSwirlyMango
    @TheSwirlyMango Жыл бұрын

    Consider dropping the sponsor Established Titles, some recent controversy coming to light from them.

  • @LeeroyGgJenkins
    @LeeroyGgJenkins Жыл бұрын

    Tldr: Established Titles is not legit check out Scott Shaffer's video about it. Is it true if you buy land in Scotland Are you a lord? "First and foremost, you are not the owner of any land in Scotland despite what this company might have led you to believe," Andy Wightman, a former Green Member of the Scottish Parliament, wrote in an open letter to nominees. “You have also not been given any right to style yourself Lord or Lady of Glencoe

  • @marzblackbannerz6278
    @marzblackbannerz6278 Жыл бұрын

    I wish you guys understood Arabic to fully understand the weight of Sultan Qutuz's reply to Hulegu's written threat..stronger diss than Pac's hit em up lol

  • @dustintacohands1107
    @dustintacohands1107 Жыл бұрын

    I keep trying to get my head around how much smaller the mongol horses were. It looks like about 5.5 inches average to me but I’d love to hear what you guys know or can find out cuz I was having lot of trouble finding Mamluk info for some reason.

  • @cool06alt

    @cool06alt

    Жыл бұрын

    Steppe Mongols horse were small, often described as 11-12 hands. Turkoman horses howevermust have gained decent traits from Arabian horses and Caspian horses.They're as big as 14 hands.

  • @ahmaddddd100

    @ahmaddddd100

    Жыл бұрын

    Mams had an accsess to Arabian horses, which are far superior to any breed, faster , stronger , smarter and more resilient

  • @muhammadtayyab2718
    @muhammadtayyab2718 Жыл бұрын

    Nice work

  • @benjauron5873
    @benjauron5873 Жыл бұрын

    Oh, shit! Established Titles is still finding promoters! I thought I was the last person to get the news that it was a scam! Guess not...

  • @Dieter-Doeddel
    @Dieter-Doeddel Жыл бұрын

    Please do a video on Scottish medieval customs next, especially how to become a "laird" after purchasing a handful of Scottish soil! Heard a lot of Mamluks became Lords thanks to that custom. 🤣

  • @milanjudak7574

    @milanjudak7574

    Жыл бұрын

    cant believe people were stupid enough to take it seriously is everybody in Scotland a Lord because they have a house there?

  • @Dieter-Doeddel

    @Dieter-Doeddel

    Жыл бұрын

    @@milanjudak7574 Kings and Generals was apparently fully convinced of the sincerity of their ad partner. Quite dumb of them, I agree! 🤣

  • @milanjudak7574

    @milanjudak7574

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Dieter-Doeddel would still be a fun souvenir if it was cheaper and they actually plant some trees even when the entire tree-carbon thing is nonsense

  • @arthas640

    @arthas640

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Dieter-Doeddel this charity always bugged me since they cant even sub divide the land the way they describe even if the custom was real. you cant just buy 1sqft of land in most countries. Companies claiming to plant trees for charity is also a field rife with scams since so few actually plant any trees and of those that do most dont do a good job of it and the trees are often planted in areas the trees cant survive so most die before the end of their first year.

  • @obebinaruobhuo3428
    @obebinaruobhuo342810 ай бұрын

    Nice history of conquests and building of allies.

  • @semperfidelis9083
    @semperfidelis9083 Жыл бұрын

    The barid is still used in the arab world to this day. the word nowadays referring to "mail" in general and also Bardi Ilictroni "Email". Waffidiya in Arabic also means the comers or newcomers. which is a fitting term for Mongol refugees in Egypt.

  • @sagaramskp
    @sagaramskp Жыл бұрын

    It's so interesting to note that race was so fluid in islamic world. The faith United and races didn't matter much, whether they were Arabs, moors, Turks, Qipchak, or mongol, or a sudani. U can climb the ladder if u r talented and ur racial background won't hold u back. A mongol sultan among Mamluks was a crazy thing. Can't imagine such a turn of events in western world where racism is so deep rooted. Remember an episode in K&G about a muslim African governor in India.

  • @tatarcavalry2342

    @tatarcavalry2342

    Жыл бұрын

    Qipchak is a branch of Turk Turk is the general term for Oghuzs Qipchaks etc.

  • @loulishadow1468

    @loulishadow1468

    Жыл бұрын

    @@user-cg2tw8pw7j كيف يا اخي؟

  • @loulishadow1468

    @loulishadow1468

    Жыл бұрын

    @@user-cg2tw8pw7j ما فهمت

  • @MyBuzzL

    @MyBuzzL

    Жыл бұрын

    @الأزدي ummayad is still the most racist that muslim leader ever have. yes, they do not differentiate their subject like europe colonization, but the governor was always arabic, whether in eastest central asia or westest berber north africa. and because of this racism, abbasid can exploit the enemy especially persian to rebel against ummayad and make abbasid the new caliph

  • @achtet7480

    @achtet7480

    Жыл бұрын

    in a way they were more progressive than European colonists.

  • @faeezf
    @faeezf Жыл бұрын

    Lord Mark Felton and Lord Kings & Generals, please make a video about the legitimacy of Establish Titles

  • @banerjeesiddharth05
    @banerjeesiddharth05 Жыл бұрын

    Nice documentary 👌 👍 👏

  • @156Rafi
    @156Rafi Жыл бұрын

    Established Titles has a strong probability of being a scam, please be aware of it, investigate it on your own, and be vigilant for the next one. Honestly can't blame them for taking the sponsorship, it sounds amazing and mutually beneficial; but for the sake of the viewers, please be vigilant and careful of such a offer. Edited to sound less of a lecture.

  • @megadwarf4714

    @megadwarf4714

    Жыл бұрын

    this

  • @GC13

    @GC13

    Жыл бұрын

    I think they're just fulfilling their contracted obligation. There's no pinned comment for it this time, and oh boy did they get an earfull about Established Titles in their Why was Italy Disunited video.

  • @kalt4689
    @kalt4689 Жыл бұрын

    As a Mongol, I did not know this at all. Great to know. Thank you

  • @prinznoir7371

    @prinznoir7371

    Жыл бұрын

    You are not mongol :)

  • @prsimoibn2710

    @prsimoibn2710

    Жыл бұрын

    Am not surprised, you are supposed to stay ignorant and to hate the people that we want you to hate, so we can use you for our goals. *I love the Mongols* especially when they kill my enemies

  • @kalt4689

    @kalt4689

    Жыл бұрын

    @@prsimoibn2710 You make no sense. Our ancestors wanted to unite the Earth under one sky “Tengeri.”. That was our goal, you can try to steal our thunder, but you can’t change history.

  • @prsimoibn2710

    @prsimoibn2710

    Жыл бұрын

    @@kalt4689 do you a have old universities and books and tradition? We sell you vegetables and alcohol, you give us soldiers to invade middle east. That's the deal take it or leave it

  • @kalt4689

    @kalt4689

    Жыл бұрын

    @@prinznoir7371 grow up kid

  • @matthewstromberg8272
    @matthewstromberg8272 Жыл бұрын

    At the beginning of the video I thought I heard you say "memes" not "means", and I pictured hand drawn memes being sent to the Mongols to confuse or entertain them.

  • @carlosfilho3402
    @carlosfilho3402 Жыл бұрын

    Thanks Tô Vídeo!

  • @orkunyucel3095
    @orkunyucel30958 ай бұрын

    Both armies had mainly good mounted archers and good light and heavy cavalry. The Mamluk Sultanate was ruled by Turkic Kipchaks and Caucasian Circassians. The army was made mainly of these two groups. The Mamluk Sultanate is the successor of the Ayyubid Sultanate, which is also of Turkic origin. In those years, Turkic Kipchak youth and Caucasian Circassian youth were enslaved in Central Asia and Eurasia during Mongol attacks and sold as slave soldiers to some countries in the Middle East. The Turkic Ayyubid Dynasty used these Turkic Kipchak and Caucasian Circassian youth in their armies after training them in a good military school. The Ayyubid army consisted mainly of these two groups. In the beginning, Turkic groups were much more. However, these soldiers had taken over the sultanate after a coup d'etat and established the Mamluk Sultanate. The word Mamluk means 'Slave' in Arabic. The language of agreement in the Mamluk Sultanate was Western Turkish, a mixture of Kipchak and Oghuz. In the past, only Arabic and Persian education was given in Madrasahs and Turkish was not a language taught in Madrasahs. For this reason, if someone in the Middle East speaks Turkish or writes in Turkish at that time, that person is Turkish. This is a litmus paper for understanding that period. "Kitâbu Bulgatü'l-Müştâk Fî Lügati't-Türk Ve'l-Kıfçak" , "Kitâbü'l-Ef'al" and "Kitâb-ı Mecmû-ı Tercümân-ı Türkî and Acemî ve Mugalî” are some examples written in Mamluk Kipchak language.

  • @abdelrahmanmahgoub8669
    @abdelrahmanmahgoub8669 Жыл бұрын

    The peak number of Mamluks in Egypt is around 8000 by the time of Qalawun's rule and not all of them were even soldiers some of them were personal servants and workers. The core of the army at that time were comprised of "Halaqa" soldiers who were free trained soldiers of native Egyptians, and their number were around 15 to 20 thousand during conflict time and the second to them were reserve soldiers and volunteers from various professions upon the call for "Jehad" in villages and cities across the country according to historians who recorded these events and some of these historians were sons of former mamluks who were eventually assimilated into the local community. There is an over-amplifying of the significance of slave trade on the success of the sultanate of Egypt specially on the early conflict with the Mongols when the inner conflicts and schism between the mamluks were still active and the mamluks assimilation system was still immature.

  • @calidone7661

    @calidone7661

    Жыл бұрын

    even majority of the army was local arabs; i think it's because the core professionals and leaders. especially ain jalut was a classical feigned retreat. i also think bedouin cavalry was highly skilled in this kind of tactical understanding.

  • @abdelrahmanmahgoub8669

    @abdelrahmanmahgoub8669

    Жыл бұрын

    @@calidone7661 Bedouin Arabs also were not largely involved in the conflict due to their conflict with early Ayyubids and later with the sultanate of Egypt, Salaheddin himself had major incidents with Arab tribes and forced all Arab tribes living to the east of the Nile delta to be displaced to upper Egypt or to the Maghreb out of fear of their alliance with crusaders. The relationship between mamluk sultans and Arabs were even worse as they saw Arab tribes as source of disruption and forced majority of them out of Egypt to the Nubian kingdom of Makuria "North Sudan".

  • @arda213

    @arda213

    Жыл бұрын

    @@calidone7661 Arabs didnt call Mamluk Empire ed dewlet-ul Turkiyya for no reason. This revisionist friend above is having hard time admitting it but throughout the middle ages after the Abbasid Empire was no more, Turks have been the sword of islam for the last 1000 years.

  • @calidone7661

    @calidone7661

    Жыл бұрын

    @@arda213 nations age like people. once they were young; fast and furious. straight out from heart of the desert, all the way from france to china. this scale of conquest should not be overlooked.

  • @trillmoney263

    @trillmoney263

    Жыл бұрын

    @@abdelrahmanmahgoub8669wrong the ayyubids were Arabs. And a lot of the mamluk soldiers were arab Bedouins. Isa ibn muhanna fought in 2 battle of Homs and he was the mvp on the mamluks side. The first battle of Homs was ayyubids vs mongols.

  • @daarom3472
    @daarom3472 Жыл бұрын

    Mamlukes have bonus damage against Mangudai, drill Siege Ram also dies to Mamluke.

  • @sidp5381
    @sidp5381 Жыл бұрын

    I was wondering if you guys will redo the Ottoman conquest of Egypt with better graphics

  • @KingsandGenerals

    @KingsandGenerals

    Жыл бұрын

    Yep

  • @abdallaha92

    @abdallaha92

    Жыл бұрын

    @@KingsandGenerals If you guys want to do the 1st Ottoman Mamluk war, I suggest Struggle for Domination in the Middle East: The Ottoman-Mamluk War, 1485-91. There he goes into detail about the battle of Aga cayiri.

  • @fatechance4013

    @fatechance4013

    Жыл бұрын

    @@KingsandGenerals i think you're missing mongol invasion on SEA region especially on Singasari kingdom before the rise of Majapahit empire.

  • @SB-qm5wg
    @SB-qm5wg Жыл бұрын

    Great video.

  • @mtuguj6366
    @mtuguj6366 Жыл бұрын

    Mamlukes were a mixture of turkic and circassian people, the first state, Albahreyya, was turkic ruled mostly, with circassian presence especially under the rule of Qalawun, the second state, alburjeyya, was circassian dominated, but had also turkic rulers within it, most sultans or emirs names were turkic originated, even for those who were not turkic,the name baybas and title Aldhaher, was also given to one who lived few years before him under the rule of Najm eldin Ayyoub the king of egypt,who baybars himself served under later. There was baybars aljashenkir, a circassian, who was also sultan during the Albahreyya turkic dominated era. The names they carried were given names to them by their masters, and not necessarily were the names they were born with.. there was also a burjy circassian sultan called bars-bay, same meaning of baybars, but flipped.. Tuman Bay, Qaitbay, and others, all the names they carried were given by the masters that bought and raised them, take Baybars as an example: Aldhaher Rukn Aldeen Baybars Albandaqdary AlSalehy Alnajmy, Aldhaher, a title he gave himself when became a sultan and means the one who over shadows or overcome others, RuknAldeen, an arabic given name to him by his master, Baybars, a turkic given name to him, Albandaqdary, in reference to his master, prince Alaa aldeen idekin Albandaqdary, AlSalehy, reference to him belonging to the late sultan of Egypt. King Alsaleh Najm Aldeen Ayyoub,, Alnajmy Reference to his later Emir Saif Aldeen Aqtay (Uktay) Alala'y Alnajmy.

  • @painitself8597
    @painitself8597 Жыл бұрын

    Hey! I really love the free quality content.And been enjoying these new videos.This channel has so much video about turkish empires But there is not a video about origins of the Turks. Would love to see a video about that!

  • @nenenindonu
    @nenenindonu Жыл бұрын

    The Khalji Mamluks of the Delhi Sultanate also had a series of great defensive victories against the Mongols with Alauddin Khalji doing most of the work, Medieval Mamluks were a Mongol's nemesis :)

  • @nenenindonu

    @nenenindonu

    Жыл бұрын

    @Los Blancos Bruh... Mamluk is not an ethnicity all the five ruling Dynasties of the Delhi Sultanate were technically Mamluks

  • @Nomadicenjoyer31

    @Nomadicenjoyer31

    Жыл бұрын

    @9/11 was done by bush afghanized Turkic people KHALAJ PEOPLE

  • @hassanabdulsalam1000

    @hassanabdulsalam1000

    Жыл бұрын

    @@nenenindonu Khiljis only defeated jagatai khanate weakest of mongol khanate and they were more turkic than Mongols

  • @Nomadicenjoyer31

    @Nomadicenjoyer31

    Жыл бұрын

    @@hassanabdulsalam1000 They had still huge army (500k)

  • @hassanabdulsalam1000

    @hassanabdulsalam1000

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Nomadicenjoyer31 they say alaudin khilji had more than 1000 elephant in one battle

  • @me0101001000
    @me0101001000 Жыл бұрын

    I highly encourage you to drop your sponsorship by Established Titles. There have been some probes into the integrity of the company, and the findings have not been very flattering.

  • @el_bronco77
    @el_bronco77 Жыл бұрын

    Would love to see a video on the Lake Batalon offensive (Operation Frulingserwachen) in March 1945. Last German offensive of WW2

  • @thewarriorfrog
    @thewarriorfrog Жыл бұрын

    There were 4 nations which have managed to defeat the 1200's Mongols in war ; Javanese (Majapahit), Turks (Khalji & Bahri Mamluks), Japanese, Vietnamese (Dai Viet). Mongols of the first half of the 13th century however were unstoppable

  • @Nomadicenjoyer31

    @Nomadicenjoyer31

    Жыл бұрын

    @@yousafdaudzai3078 Afghanized Turkic people of Khalaj origin, there are like 6-7 Afghan tribes who have Turkic origins

  • @MrHoonza

    @MrHoonza

    Жыл бұрын

    Mongols conquered Sumatra Island. Viets are Mongols multi invade after they suggested to be Mongols alliance. They conquered Fukuoka island. But they know samurais will defend them midnight. Then they slept on the boats while hurricane. Turks are Turcix. Not today's Turkeys. Why Afghanistan's capitol is named Kabul who is establisher of Mongols! To be stupid must need document! LoL 😂

  • @yaralikatil

    @yaralikatil

    Жыл бұрын

    @@submeoff3297 simply no

  • @Khan_dakid

    @Khan_dakid

    Жыл бұрын

    You do know that the 13th century and the 1200s are the same thing right

  • @tafad5138

    @tafad5138

    Жыл бұрын

    Japanese not defeteating mongol, it was typhoon

  • @napoleonibonaparte7198
    @napoleonibonaparte7198 Жыл бұрын

    The fall of the Mamluks would be a great next episode.

  • @scourgeofgodattila579

    @scourgeofgodattila579

    Жыл бұрын

    Selim the Grim was a military genius just one click below Napoleon. May even be considered equal.

  • @21stEidein

    @21stEidein

    Жыл бұрын

    @@scourgeofgodattila579 i mean, the Mamluks by the times of Selim were not at their best

  • @Emir-ny5iq

    @Emir-ny5iq

    Жыл бұрын

    @@21stEidein still, it's quite impressive how he managed to conquer all of egypt in just 8 years. especially since there is a literal desert between cairo and anatolia.

  • @scourgeofgodattila579

    @scourgeofgodattila579

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Emir-ny5iq Not 8, 2 years.

  • @sarim9574
    @sarim9574 Жыл бұрын

    @13:20 The defense tactic is very interesting, because I think that was the Crusader policy in the early 12th century in which the 4 Crusader principalities agreed to join in defense against any Muslim offensive.

  • @kennethflores93
    @kennethflores93 Жыл бұрын

    Fascinating vid, Baybars adopted some Roman ingenuity.

  • @lerneanlion
    @lerneanlion Жыл бұрын

    Will the information of this video will be used in regarding what is going on in the Islamic world in the alternate universe about what if the Mongols inaveded Europe and the Seventh Crusade is formed to fight them?

  • @enlilofnippur8409
    @enlilofnippur8409 Жыл бұрын

    7:12 So the Mongols and Mamelukes were both predominantly cavalry forces, but the latter had superior armor, weapons, and training for extended close quarters combat? In what respect? Would *love* some more detail on that and things like it in other videos; if total time is a concern, even if at the expense of some of the “big picture” narrative.

  • @ahmeteminerdogan9266

    @ahmeteminerdogan9266

    Жыл бұрын

    You can check Mamluk weapon and armor sets that survived to this day. Mamluks were trained since their childhood in close combat as well as ranged warfare. They would carry a bow, a lance and a sword to the battle. Whereas Mongols being very skilled at horse riding, they didn't engage in close combat very often and would choose to skirmish instead. They are also not known for wearing heavy armor. Their success is largely due to quick mobilization of their self reliant, low cost tribesmen armies and well played psychological warfare. Mamluks were so confident in melee combat that when Ottomans came and defeated them with superior weapons such as bombards, the captured Mamluk leader would tell Selim the Grim that "if it wasn't for the gunpowder we would have easily crushed you". Additionally Napoleon too appreciated their mastery at sword and close combat and bravery during his invasion of Egypt. Mamluks were not destroyed when Ottomans took over, they continued to be a very dominant political/military group in the region until Mehmet Ali Pasha executed most of Mamluk emirs in a surprise night raid.

  • @ahmeteminerdogan9266

    @ahmeteminerdogan9266

    Жыл бұрын

    In fact the term "mamluk" may have originated in Ayyıbid Egypt but the tradition of slave soldiers originates from ghulam/ghilman/kölemen system that Abbasids established. There were many "mamluk" or "ghulam" states formed by these Turkic slaves, Ghaznavids, Sultanate of Delhi, Tolunids are a few of them.

  • @revivalist355

    @revivalist355

    Жыл бұрын

    @@ahmeteminerdogan9266 according to one account of Marj Dabiq , the ottomans were losing the early part of the battle taking massive casualties. Selim was shook that he considered offering a truce. The betrayal of one of the Mamluk Amirs , I believe ruler of aleppo who had a prior agreement with selim saved the day for the ottomans

  • @jeffreyabell
    @jeffreyabell Жыл бұрын

    Well done

  • @imlaughinq7445
    @imlaughinq7445 Жыл бұрын

    High medieval history is my favorite

  • @kmmmsyr9883
    @kmmmsyr9883 Жыл бұрын

    Guys, we love you and your incredible videos, but please stop the Established Titles sponsorship already. Sure, you maybe didn't know it was a scam at first, but everyone is commenting that it's a scam for the last few videos. It's the time to stop the sponsorship and let your viewers know about the situation. Your prestige in the eyes of viewers drop with every sponsorship you do with them after their scam became publicly known.

  • @Rodzyniastyyyy
    @Rodzyniastyyyy Жыл бұрын

    Established Titles is a scam. Don't touch it even with a stick.

  • @rationalsamrat3247
    @rationalsamrat3247 Жыл бұрын

    Hey, can you make some videos covering India aswell, i was hoping to see few more videos covering India. It seems you havent done a video on India for some time. Specially about Chola empire , and Gupta empire ,rashtrakuta dynasty aswell .

  • @jozzieokes3422
    @jozzieokes3422 Жыл бұрын

    Quality stuff

  • @thewarriorfrog
    @thewarriorfrog Жыл бұрын

    Mamlūk authors almost always refer to their Sultanate as " the state of the Turks " ( dawlat al - atrāk dawlat al - turk/ al - dawla al - turkiyya ) . They usually seem to be aware of the fact that the reign of the “ Turks " Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam,Volume 39 Magnes Press, The Hebrew University., 2012

  • @williemherbert1456

    @williemherbert1456

    Жыл бұрын

    @@ziyadpepe6291 That's one of place where they were sourced from, but in truth these are vastly diverse folks from many origins, there are Cuman, Kipchak, Avar, Bolgar, Turks, Mongol, Tatar, Circassian, etc, but with one similarity, being enslaved and sold out into market in Persia and Arabia as slave that could either be hired as mercenary, household tenant, cattle slave, or even assisting scribe, but mostly those from Central Asia would be turned into personal mercenary.

  • @thanos7715

    @thanos7715

    Жыл бұрын

    turks trying to take credit, no they have nothing to do with modern day turks chill the fuck out

  • @scourgeofgodattila579

    @scourgeofgodattila579

    Жыл бұрын

    Jalal Al-Din Mangburni defeated the Mongols 11 times. Jalal Al-Din>Alauddin Khilji+Baibars

  • @meta196

    @meta196

    Жыл бұрын

    >T̼̼̖̾͟͞h̨͚͚͖ͯ̒̄͗͞ḛ̡̰̳͓̥ͬ͋ͪͧ H͇͇̹͊ͪ́̕ͅḛ̡̰̳͓̥ͬ͋ͪͧb͔͔̳͈̊̆ͥ͂͜͝ṛ̣̬̫̍͌ͩ͟ḛ̡̰̳͓̥ͬ͋ͪͧw̡̻̻̣͚̒̀ͅ U̝̝̝̲̦ͣ͋͛̊n̫̫̘̗͕̲̲̎ͥi̧̻̻͉̜͑ͪ̾͟v̹̹̘̼̞̻͆ͩ̓ͪ͢ḛ̡̰̳͓̥ͬ͋ͪͧṛ̣̬̫̍͌ͩ͟s̨̞̞̰͎͎̪̩͕̈́̀ͯ̍ͧͅi̧̻̻͉̜͑ͪ̾͟t͖͖̠̬͛y͙͙̪̰ͫ͌́

  • @climax050
    @climax050 Жыл бұрын

    Amazing video as always, however established titles is a scam. Search the video here on YT, guy goes into the company and how it doesn't make you a lord at all.

  • @jacquesfrancois4275
    @jacquesfrancois4275 Жыл бұрын

    You guys beat history dose to it!

  • @jimr9499
    @jimr9499 Жыл бұрын

    Mamluk is a fun word.

  • @drakehashimoto685
    @drakehashimoto685 Жыл бұрын

    @Kings and Generals Great video as always guys, but Established Titles is a scam, check out Scott Shafer's vid about it, as much as his list of many content creators.

  • @HarrisNMeo
    @HarrisNMeo Жыл бұрын

    Can anyone tell me what is the name of the music that starts from 10:10 in the video? K&G often uses it. It is so epic.

Келесі