its not mandatory for the prime minister to be from the lok sabha as said in the video. PM manmohan singh was a rajya sabha member from assam

@xijinpig8982

11 ай бұрын

I'm an NRI and I always thought he was elected from Punjab- 💀 Guess im racist now 💀💀💀

@arijitpalit2756

11 ай бұрын

@@xijinpig8982 we don't expect anything from NRIs anyways, you are cool.

@Tenisinspector8341

11 ай бұрын

@@xijinpig8982but why tho? Like just lol at Atal Bihari or Narasimha Rao, what part Punjabi are they?

@arpan9937

11 ай бұрын

@@arijitpalit2756 Lmao that was cold 😂 😂

@juliuscaesar564

10 ай бұрын

@@arijitpalit2756 chill bro, but ur correct lol

India also has 10 Autonomous District Councils (ADC). Which are like State within a State. They have their own Government, Legislative Assembly and is led by a Chief Executive Member (CEM). Election is held every 5 year. ADCs are basically Reserved Land for Native Tribals to protect their culture, identity & heritage.

@utkarsharyan

10 ай бұрын

So they are like the Native Reservations in USA kzread.info/dash/bejne/rGlrtbpylqeqiZc.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/fGmErtuShqyroMo.html

@Dhruv-Kumar

10 ай бұрын

Im not even Boro but I think Boroland needs separate state. ADC or ATC is not enough.

@Lance14470

10 ай бұрын

​@@Dhruv-Kumaras an Assamese, I think yes, Bodoland should be separated to keep both Assamese and Bodo people in their respective states to stop further instability

@Dhruv-Kumar

10 ай бұрын

@@Lance14470 its fortunate that there are good assamese like you. Assamese and bengali should understand that boro and gorkha are different. Anyway cheers!

@Lance14470

10 ай бұрын

@@Dhruv-Kumar yeah, the most of the Assamese you encounter have no knowledge of ethinic stability and things that cause fighting like in Manipur. We can take Manipur as an example and separate the people who are asking to be separated and give them their state they want

The term "socialist" was added to the constitution's preamble without any democratic procedures during the infamous "emergency" declared by Indira Gandhi.

@Kaito028

11 ай бұрын

Then why is it still there. The government is changed now right?

@MaKar372

10 ай бұрын

@@Kaito028 The amendment which added the words also included a lot of things which are very important for the constitution like it also added the word 'integrity',gave free legal aid to people,etc..most of its parts which are unnecessary and authorative parts are removed

@sundarraj_perumal_0612

10 ай бұрын

So what , socialism means "Sarva or Sabi dharma" , which means the justice for all on equal basis . Is that a problem for you?

@Edward4Plantagenet

10 ай бұрын

@@sundarraj_perumal_0612 , U are !IIiterate who know little bit English. Read again what you wrote. Socialism means 😁😂

@VaishnavENK

10 ай бұрын

All mainstream parties in India have "socialist", social democratic, social-welfare oriented policies in their agendas, from BJP to CPI-M

For someone who is not native to India , This video was very well made , good job

@martinssalvatore7702

10 ай бұрын

Hi how are you doing 😊

@annoyedbrox4851

10 ай бұрын

@@martinssalvatore7702 stop, you are making a fool out of our glorius nation, i assure you all that most indians are not like him

this will be the least political comment section ever

@Computment

11 ай бұрын

Totally (No promises)

@Cyclonixs

11 ай бұрын

Yup

@Private-Potato

11 ай бұрын

Totally no political arguments whatsoever

@spaghettiisyummy.3623

11 ай бұрын

Real Bengali?

@F.G_7even

11 ай бұрын

@spaghettiisyummy.3623 yes sir real bangladeshi

As an Indian, I will say you did a pretty good job explaining things (though I should note the previous PM Manmohan Singh was elected from the Rajya Sabha), and your pronunciation didn't kill my ears, although you kind of flubbed the long and short vowels.

@singam7436

11 ай бұрын

Also, I should note that during the latter five years of the Modi Sarkaar, there have been some more conflicts regarding the constitutional balance surrounding Indian federalism, especially with many opposition ruled states having conflicts the Centre appointed governors (most notably my home state Tamil Nadu between the CM Stalin, and governor Ravi)

@gautamb0927

11 ай бұрын

​@@singam7436dmk has a history with picking fights with governors. Dmk hate being questioned. They love to behave dictators. Actually dmk tried to separate tamilnadu from india during 70s by begging in front of UN and that party's mentor EVR begged to Britain in 40s during independence to make tamilnadu. Nobody cared though. The Party has a history of being traitors to the state and country.

@adarshmohapatra5058

10 ай бұрын

@@singam7436 Wait how is a Governor of a state appointed? Does only the President have the power to appoint them and the state has no power in this regard?

@ayowhat9570

10 ай бұрын

​@@adarshmohapatra5058no state didn't have any power to appoint governor. governor is appointed by President ( Puppet) on the advice of Prime minister.

@riderchallenge4250

10 ай бұрын

@@singam7436 so called democracy still have dynasty lol that too corrupt

As an Indian, to explain the slightly confusing concept of both Unitary and Federal structure of our government: It was done to draw a contrast between the nature of India and some other countries, like USA, UK, and Soviet Union, from where we imbibed some of the ideas for our Constitution. In the above mentioned countries, several independent geopolitical units came together to form a Union, the 4 kingdoms of UK, the 13 colonies of America, the Soviet Republics in USSR, etc. And each of these units was equal to each other and largely independent. They had provisions or at least weak ties that could enable them to Secede or break away from the larger Union, like the break up of Soviet Union, the short period of American Civil War, or the presently on going Scottish Independence referendum. In India however, this is not the case. We see our country as a single unbreakeable whole, a permanent Union of the People of India (and not states). This Union of people shall divide itself into smaller units (states) for ease of governance only and for no other claims of local autonomy. No territory of India may ever breakaway from the Union. It's punisheable as treason to speak of another separation of India (the horrors of Partition). But, such a large population we are, we might not always get along well with our cousins, and tensions will rise, so we prefer to draw lines within our country than across it. That is, we are kinda flexible with our state borders. It's not very easy to carve a new state, but not impossible. However, the Union of India shall always be a single indivisible entity. That's the Federal structure with Unitary features.

@Dominik-lc4pl

11 ай бұрын

Great, you just defined a unitary state

@ishanbajpai6940

11 ай бұрын

Beautifully explained.

@thefunnyone9148

11 ай бұрын

Quasi Federal structure of government was taken from *Canada's system* by Indian Constitution

@Indian_Rajput

11 ай бұрын

Yeah it's clearly written Breakable states but unbreakable country 😂😂😂, but Everything is free in India unlike China

@Ironbanner12

11 ай бұрын

Just read the Pol Sc book of class 10

Federalism without Federalism that's India

@BlueIvory4

11 ай бұрын

Same with Nigeria but they have the nerve to call themselves the ‘Federal Republic of Nigeria’

@artman12

11 ай бұрын

It’s called “Quasi-federalism”. Most countries lie on a spectrum between being totally unitary and totally federal.

@chongjunxiang3002

11 ай бұрын

Sometime unitary country is surprisingly federal. Take China as example. While gaokao are all at the same day and same time, the paper is varied by region, thus lead to unequal difficulty and stress to student.

@singam7436

11 ай бұрын

I mean, it is still quite federal culturally, even if heavily centralised constitutionally (look at the kaveri conflicts for example)

@yadvenderrana695

11 ай бұрын

Quasi federalism with a unitary tilt

Correction: Prime Minister can also be elected from among the Members of Rajya Sabha, as in Manmohan Singh who served as Prime Minister from 2004 to 2014 while being a Member of Parliament of Rajya Sabha from Assam

6:17 For other people not from India There are also other Autonomous District Councils Most of them from Northeast India

@HiveMynd

11 ай бұрын

Ooooh we don't talk about the Northeast that's a WHOLE other can of worms.

@Polavianus

11 ай бұрын

@@HiveMynd Espicially with the current situations

@arpan9937

11 ай бұрын

@@Polavianus Yeah, the Manipur shitposing...

@Polavianus

10 ай бұрын

@@arpan9937 Northeast India trying not to have any crisis (Impossible)

@abhinavsinghkushwaha9040

10 ай бұрын

@@Polavianus Northeast India trying to not have militants (impossible)

U hv got almost right,but 2 correction worth mentioning :- 1.its not necessary that PM gets elected from lok-sabha,(its ideal situation), unlike UK.But anyone can become PM,choosen by majority party but he/she must gets a membership in either of the two houses within 6 months of taking charge.(same for the ministers) 2.There is no post like deupty PM,( Constitution doesn't mention, its not a rule), it's just occasionally to satisfy the coalition partners.Since past 20 yrs India has no deputy PM. Of such complicated Nation & its politics,ur explanation in such lucid manner, deserve a applause.

@agniswar3

10 ай бұрын

In most cases it was the Home minister who was declared as the Deputy prime minister.

@maquacr7014

10 ай бұрын

​@@agniswar3Home minister of which state?

@agniswar3

10 ай бұрын

@@maquacr7014 The Home minister of India. In the history of India three Home minister went to became deputy prime minister.

@maquacr7014

10 ай бұрын

@@agniswar3 What are the executive powers of home minister? I thought home minister of a state and not country.

@VaishnavENK

10 ай бұрын

@@maquacr7014 The home minister is ike the minister of internal affairs in other countries.

You should check out how India counts and collects all those votes in such a big country with some very rural areas

@archismaanrudra876

11 ай бұрын

That's a really good Idea 😃

@Ironbanner12

11 ай бұрын

There was definitely some violence here recently in the rural elections

@saikatkhan7162

11 ай бұрын

​@@Ironbanner12 panchayat election of West Bengal???

@Tenisinspector8341

11 ай бұрын

@@Ironbanner12Bengal? The commie infestation of violent cartels? Who would’ve thought?

@arpan9937

11 ай бұрын

@@saikatkhan7162 hmm indeed, blame the illegal immigrant causing a ruckus..the centre needs to kick them out.

5:56 It's cause "Dadra and Nagar Haveli" and "Daman and Diu" were separate Union Territories before they were merged together

@pqrstsma2011

3 күн бұрын

i've always known them as 2 separate ones, when did they merge? i haven't kept up with India news for a few years

Learned more about India in 6:55 than I have all year. Well done video!

@martinssalvatore7702

10 ай бұрын

Hi 💕

@denvergamingzone9766

10 ай бұрын

🤣

@Xinnie_The_Flu

10 ай бұрын

I blame the biased western media.

Basically for all those from Presidential systems, a Ceremonial President is just there as a reserve. The government runs in their name. They are re supposed to be impartial and have no partisan bias (though most are just retired politicians). It’s a leftover feature from a constitutional monarchy where the Monarch is the head of state and is there as a backup/reserve power/monitoring authority/representative of the entire nation and not just a party. Most parliamentary forms of government are either constitutional monarchies (UK, Japan, Netherlands, Spain, Malaysia) or parliamentary republics (India, Pakistan, Germany, Ireland)

We want to rip out socialist term from preamble. It was illegally inserted

@gawkthimm6030

11 ай бұрын

isn't that sort of representing the large control over some industries that the Indian state maintains, although far from "pure socialism" (what ever that is) dosn't Indian maintain a swath of industries thats partly or wholly government managed,

@D.S.handle

11 ай бұрын

How was it illegaly inserted?

@rycrokosm

11 ай бұрын

Parliament voted on it and it got passed. Nothing about it is Illegal

@bhuvaneshs.k638

11 ай бұрын

@@gawkthimm6030 it's a mixed mess And bureaucratic hell hole It's very unfriendly for new business and entrepreneurs. Red tape socialist govt

@gawkthimm6030

11 ай бұрын

@@bhuvaneshs.k638 It sort of looks like it from the outside, but I wasn't sure, because of the huge scale of the Indian state as whole. I would guess its much easier if you are a large private company with an army or lawyers of bribes.

ah yes, lemme watch a video about a country's political system which doesnt effect me at 12 pm midnight

I think every Indian would say that the Supreme court in india is the ultimate Goat in this process. They keep all this state and central government in check. Otherwise its sometimes all circus over here 😂😂😂

@Harshiahaha

10 ай бұрын

Absolutely. And high courts for states. Sometimes I wonder what would happen without supreme court and high courts 😵‍💫

@death_parade

10 ай бұрын

It would have been great if this channel had also gone into detail about how the judiciary works and how those judges are appointed. And how accountability in the judiciary works.

@raghavantheerthagiri7888

10 ай бұрын

The judiciary is completely unaccountable and is the most corrupt arm. A huge chunk of the blame for India's issues lies with the judiciary. It is a nepotism clube with sons succeeding fathers and appointing themselves. Not the best recipe for a democracy. Unless judicial appointments are reviewed by a parliamentary committee and appointed by a statutory committee, no change is possible. Right now VIP lawyers and NGOs have a total stranglehold. Justice is only for a powerful few with connects and money.

@death_parade

10 ай бұрын

@@raghavantheerthagiri7888 Tread carefully. There are parts of India where the light of democracy does not shine. And your rights can be explained away.

@raghavantheerthagiri7888

10 ай бұрын

@@death_parade You want democracy, you need an accountable judiciary. Not nepotist milords who give judgement sbased on their whim and fancies and pandering to cabals.

FACTUAL CORRECTION: The Lok Sab elects the Prime Minister, however, the Prime Minister has to be a Member of Parliament, i.e., in one of the houses, not necessarily the Lok Sabha only.

Some corrections 2:38 - no, the Prime Minister is not necessarily elected from the Lok Sabha. Only that the party or coalition having the majority will choose someone to become PM, they can be anyone qualified to be an MP in either house. If they are already not in the house, they are given six months to be elected to either house. Just to give an example, the Prime Minister before Modi was Manmohan Singh, who was in the Rajya Sabha and not the Lok Sabha. 6:16 J&K will also have its own Legislature on the lines of Puducherry. Also the Government of India is called Central Government or Union Government interchangeably. However the proper term is the Government of India.

Indian constitution sees States as administrative units rather than devolved powers. Federalism still maintains high degree of centralization both for political and pragmatic reasons (Some Indian States are just too poor to manage certain Departments, Central Govt funds close to 80% of their outlays). Power between States and Centre is dictated by 7th Schedule which maintains 3 separate lists - State, Union and Concurrent. This creates an interesting framework for balancing Political Power. For eg: Policing is in the State List, however Law and Order (aka Public Order) is in Concurrent List. So Central Govt cannot perform day to day policing but can get itself involved in serious degradation of public order or station Centrally Armed Police Force to maintain public order at facilities.

Dadra and Nagar haveli Daman and Diu were once part of Portugese India while Pondicherry it's exclaves Karaikal, mahe and yanam were part of French India. Goa also once part of Portugese India got statehood whereas aforementioned remained union territories.

Should have mentioned Panchayats, Grama Sabhas an ld Zilla Parishad. They are the basic structures of democratic fabric of India. I am also curious if such structures are present in other countries as well.

so basically they take a really big monopoly board-

Great explanation...you explained almost all essential things in under 7 minutes 👏🏻👏🏻

This is some top-notch animating and editing

Actually, really well explained

Yes you should definitly look into formation of Telangana. They led their own movement to seperate from Andra and form the new state Telangana. I am from Chhattisgarh and my state also carried out a movement to seperate from the larger Madhaya Pradesh. Due to this I was born in M.P. and live in C.G. although I live in the same city (Bastar) in which I was born.

@daniyalbbd5281

10 ай бұрын

Why not lead a movement to separate from India ? If Indian government allowed this , they can also grant freedom ? Or it's different for Telangana people and they don't want to be separated ?

@akshayuppala9295

10 ай бұрын

@@daniyalbbd5281 I don't think anyone wants to separate from the country. Usually a state seperation is demanded because the government of the larger state can't give attention to every part of the state due to their "remoteness". Chhattisgarh seperated from the larger Madhya Pradesh due to this line of thinking. I have seen the developments that has happened here after the seperation. Road widening, infrastructure developments, new airports, new steel plants etc. I don't think anybody from Chhattisgarh wanted to separate from India. Just from state of Madhya Pradesh. Fun fact: my Dad was a government employee and had to travel 841 km to headquarters of the government office in Bhopal, M.P. to get some work done. After seperation, he had to travel only 300 km as the headquarters was in Raipur, Chhattisgarh

@MahiMahi-yu5jo

10 ай бұрын

​@@daniyalbbd5281it was to not get people to step on each other's toes. Intially, states were separated by ethnicities and micro cultures to prevent disputes. But no matter the state, all identify as Indians

@Dhruv-Kumar

10 ай бұрын

It will keep happenning. Based on diversity of India, it needs 50 states.

It is pretty accurate. Good source for all the class 10 kids giving Pol Sc exam.

Thank you for the video❤❤❤

Very well explained. Thanks for a great video. 🧡

You actually did a great job! I didn't catch any obvious mistakes. Although there's the joke about how the Indian government works - "who ever said it does?" 😂

@tintunbirha

11 ай бұрын

Of course it works " Ram Bharose"😉😉😊

@arpan9937

11 ай бұрын

It's the epicentre of confusion.

@death_parade

10 ай бұрын

I have never understood this disdain for the Indian government in the minds of the Indian people. Once a while, saying such things in frustration is acceptable. But making it a presupposition is dangerous. Objectively speaking, the Indian government does indeed work. Maybe not perfectly, but then which large nation's government is perfect?

@tintunbirha

10 ай бұрын

..just joking. Was a part of the govt and I will say this. Know the existing rules, put your application or file on the route. Have patience. Never loose your temper. Keep following up. And work DOES get done.

@rishavkumar1250

10 ай бұрын

​@@death_paradewell not really .... the Indian government is extremely efficient in putting down rebellions and protests ( The Indian air force had bombed one of its own state capitals when a rebel group had occupied it ). Its just that the Government isn't interested in solving other issues like erratic electricity, education issues, etc ... these are mainly due to corruption

Most accurate video about India ever

As an Indian who have studied the Indian Polity, I can confirm you worked really hard and the information is Completely correct except 2 minor errors.

Woah that was information dense… imma rewatch this

0:40 the words Socialist and Secular were forcefully added in 1970s under PM Indira Gandhi’s tenure, and was not present at Independence. India no longer is Socialist.

@gawkthimm6030

11 ай бұрын

isn't the 'Socialism' part sort of representing the large control over some industries that the Indian state maintains, although far from "pure socialism" (what ever that is) dosn't Indian maintain a swath of industries thats partly or wholly government managed,

@LplusRatioLol

11 ай бұрын

@@gawkthimm6030 yes. But after 1991 reforms and then subsequent reforms in various governments since then, India has allowed private sector participation in most things, although many government ones still run alongside as a ‘socialist’ scheme. Except for defence, there are no other sectors where private players haven’t already established. So now Indian model is more of a capitalistic one. Government also sold Air India, the only public Airline to a private player. BSNL telecom is breathing its last breaths, will be dissolved in the next 2 decades. Many Public a sector banks are being merged, soon there will be only a few left

@gawkthimm6030

11 ай бұрын

@@LplusRatioLol When I search for "Indian state owned companies", I still find a lot and on the wiki; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Government-owned_companies_of_India

@Indian_Rajput

11 ай бұрын

India is a capitalist country until our economy reach $50T.

@otomackena7610

11 ай бұрын

@@gawkthimm6030 Yes, they still exist but not really big outside of some "strategic sectors" like Defence, Energy and Banking. Several govt owned companies were privatized over the years either through gov offloading their stake through markets or putting up for outright sale through auction. Every year govt privatize some govt owned companies most of them except some large ones runs in losses.

That's actually quite a good explanation!

India's supposed to be a parliamentary democracy, but in practice acts like an executive dominated democracy, Indian parliament is in practice far weaker than even the US Congress in the presidential USA, the same applies to state legislatures which are even more feeble than the national parliament. Some of this is structural resulting in the extraordinary powers the Indian constitution gave to the executive despite creating a parliamentary republic (for example the ability to create temporary laws called "ordinances" sort of like executive orders in USA), how it doesn't really prevent the executive from cutting down parliamentary sessions, the speaker not being very independent in practice, the way Indian parties function, the legal prevention of MPs going against party line in the parliament, etc. So when a government has a single party majority in the parliament, the parliament (especially the Lok Sabha) turns into a rubber stamp of the executive with very little actual checking of executive power. Theoretically the Rajya Sabha offers some protection against this but in practice there are ways to completely bypass it like randomly designating a bill as a "money bill" or calling a joint session. When factoring all that only the judiciary actually checks the executive, which is why at times when the executive is very strong electorally they end up at loggerheads with the judiciary and speak of expanding parliamentary power (proxy for their power) against the judiciary like in the 70s or what you were seeing just a few months ago. Also the balance between the Union and the State is never very clear in practice either, states have gradually gotten more powerful overtime so although at the immediate post-independence period they were weak when compared to the centre and were easily dismissed by it through "presidential rule", today they're pretty powerful entities capable of going against national laws on a number of issues especially those on the concurrent list of the constitution (eg- Tamil Nadu rejecting the education policies of the centre) and are difficult to dismiss.

@kartikeykasniya6971

11 ай бұрын

It is because after a long time (about 45years) a single party has absolute majority in central government. Otherwise making any controversial and almost any decision in general was almost impossible, specially during parliamentary crisis of 90s. Just because government with absolute majority gets it's way, doesn't make it worse than USA

@kartikeykasniya6971

11 ай бұрын

An you are mostly right about the rest of the part.

@leadharsh0616

11 ай бұрын

thankfully atleast someone wrote this!

@jayeshratangairi8732

11 ай бұрын

And everyone agrees that the Supreme court of India is the best amongst them . Even now and then they keep both state and central government in check . Sadly not having a majority in parliament has led to alot of side movement in policies rather than forward moving one like in recent times

@arpan9937

11 ай бұрын

indeed. In my view, the Indian state values federalism too much. This slows down the reforms which are mostly brought around by the centre. I think Centre should have the ability to shove down reforms in any states and if seen on priority basis, then the border states.

Nice video. Thanks!

The word federal is never mentioned anywhere in Indian constitution

@Kaito028

11 ай бұрын

But it did described India as a union of states.

@Edward4Plantagenet

10 ай бұрын

@@Kaito028 , yeah, so!!?????

@Kaito028

10 ай бұрын

@@Edward4Plantagenet federalism.

Good to have a new video. I guess that instead of them being ASAP, they have been WIFLI. It's basically the British system but without the King. In Canada, we have a system of divided sovereignty between the federal and provincial and at the federal level it's Prime Minister and Premier at the provincial.

Great video.

I have seen videos on US and Chinese Government structure. Good to know about Indian government structure

China has progressed because of its government India is progressing despite it.

@PotatoMan007

10 ай бұрын

It's the other way around.

@death_parade

10 ай бұрын

Favourite Indian pass-time: slandering the Indian government while not giving a f**k about civic sense.

@Tejas_

10 ай бұрын

Well both governments have their flaws, but china being almost like a dictatorship does help the speed of decision making.

@death_parade

10 ай бұрын

@@Tejas_ Authoritarian speed of decision making also means decisions with little oversight or public discourse which leads to stupid policies like the one-child policy that blow back in your face. Democracies that involve public discourse do have slow decision making, but such decision making is more stable. Ofcourse this can only happen when the electorate/voters are not complete idI0ts. In real life, most voters are idi0ts who seldom pay attention to the policy aspects, rather they only pay attention to their own bottom line and fall victim to vote bank politics or freebie politics.

@VaishnavENK

10 ай бұрын

Quality > Speed. The CCP will not exist by the next century.

TIF India has a president and it is not Modi. Are there any good videos explaining why some presidents like Macron and Biden are in charge and there is no or less powerful PM but in some cases lik Scholz and Modi the PM is in charge and nobody really knows the president. And then there is Russia where the importance of the PM/President changed with Putin.

@maquacr7014

10 ай бұрын

Look up the difference between presidential form of government and parlimentary form of government.

Bro finally someone sensible put up the true map of India...hats off

Great work

Proud to be an INDIAN🇮🇳👳

Amazing video

India also has panchyat Raj institutions means at district and villages govt levels elections. Its much more democratized

Thank you.

It works?

For your kind information, you have used distorted map of India in video .. Please correct it in upcomming videos

We had our Partition kind of like US's North vs South civil wars. So we later made sure no more partition takes place and settle things amicably.

@Rahul_Singh100

10 ай бұрын

Nope. It was nothing like US. US had a proper civil war. India didn't have any civil war, there was no Indian military involved. It was muslim fanatics and muslim nationalists who did violent riots and massacres in areas dominating muslim population to force Indian govt to accept Partition. Even as Pakistan declared itself islamic republic, Indian govt refused to become a Hindu republic or even a republic with atleast state religion...It was obsessed with socialism and USSR and India became a country with same kind of insecure Central Govt like USSR had with little to no federalism on ground but federalism in school textbooks and constitution to give a sugar-coated view.

@t.s.p1864

10 ай бұрын

​@@Rahul_Singh100so true khilafat movement and direct action day way not to get freedom from colonial brits but was establish sharia supremacist ideals over majority, thus asking for separate nation a fake country, where people are getting killed everywhere everyday its called paxtan

Bruh the last genaral election was held in 2019 not 2018, how did you miss that

mf explained india better than our own indian textbooks

@BayernFan05

11 ай бұрын

Have you ever read Jayanti Sengupta's books? They explain quite well.

@arpan9937

11 ай бұрын

They are just confusing. I hated civics lol

@BayernFan05

11 ай бұрын

@@arpan9937 Unfortunately, for both of us, I love civics.

@papastalin1543

10 ай бұрын

Ncert is trash, and is written by idiots specially the social studies. Maths and science are fine tho

@sonuchauhan-ne3cj

10 ай бұрын

You haven't studied textbooks then.

As white American, the government of India fascinates me and I wished we learned more about it. It’s history as being based in British (and to a lesser extent French and Portuguese) colonial rule and being then taken over by locals, it’s importance in the Cold War and it’s status in helping India become a rising power.

@oxy2986

11 ай бұрын

India isn't rising it's just becoming what it was in past .

@MaKar372

10 ай бұрын

@@oxy2986 we are regaining our glory

@rishavkumar1250

10 ай бұрын

​@@oxy2986past ??? We were ruled over by the Europeans and Turks

@oxy2986

10 ай бұрын

@@rishavkumar1250 😂 no it is present dude I am talking about 400 years before now .

@lorenzomizushal3980

10 ай бұрын

​@@oxy2986 so India is going backwards? Lol. Go forward, not backwards, brother.

India has a federal structure with a unitary bias. One will find features of both federalism and unitarianism in India.

Thank you for using the images of new parliament 😅

Please explain how the south African government works

How does the Indian government work? Incompetently.

@DustinLaGriza

11 ай бұрын

Not really, you just need to know the right people to bribe.

@RK-cj4oc

11 ай бұрын

​@@DustinLaGrizaThats sentence is so Ironic it gave me iron poisoning.

@thelakeman2538

11 ай бұрын

Happens when your recruitment process is prone to a scam every other week, and despite millions of people undertaking your recruitment exams, almost all of them are heavily understaffed because you've chronically underfunded most departments and agencies so they literally cannot hire many who pass those exams. If the state institutions are broken then of course the government operates incompetently.

@afkass4965

11 ай бұрын

You are an American citizen commenting on Indian political incompetence. Sit down brother your presidents are literal pedophiles, rap*sts and crybabies who refuse to leave parliaments when they lose. Indian government has improved a lot under modi government, especially compared to how high high corruption used to be before modi. Corruption was institutionalized before him. At least that stopped. Sure, corruption on a lower level is possible

@Indian_Rajput

11 ай бұрын

Not after 2014 nowdays Local govts are going wild. Central govt is all okay

Woah 🤩 which building is that? 6:20 it looks so majestic

@kartik5001

11 ай бұрын

Vidhana Soudha

@leaDR356

11 ай бұрын

Vidhan Sabha

@rollsroyce4249

11 ай бұрын

"Mysore palace" in the same state looks even better

@theheat3144

11 ай бұрын

Karnataka assembly (Bangluru)

Class 9th civics class lecture

1:45 u showed the picture of the Rashtrapati Bhavan - Residence of the Indian President while referring to the Parliament, which is a different building. Otherwise, good video.

@agniswar3

10 ай бұрын

It is not called Raj Bhavan but Rashtrapati Bhavan.

@anishkushari6145

10 ай бұрын

@@agniswar3 yeah yeah my bad, Raj bhavan is the governor's house

Cool

Can youtube make videos of wrong map of india 🇮🇳 availible in china 🇨🇳 and not in india

States formed from other states has happened in the US. Maine from Massachusetts or Kentucky from Virginia to name a few

Thanks for letting me know that Indian Government works!

Very informative, indias finding a way to govern 1.5 billion people democratically republic society, way to go india!!

@prateeksharma6706

2 ай бұрын

Finding ?😕 we are doing it since 1947 basically for 77 years

One explanation i liked on India government is comparing it to the Holy Roman Empire . With The president being like the emperor while having many governors of states important in their own rights in local matters . So India is run a bit like HRE while not being Roman , Holy or an empire .

2:45 Its not Always required that the Prime minister be a member of Lok Sabha (people's house) ,he/she can be member of Rajya Sabha(council of States) too. The only requirement is he/she should have the support of majority of members of the Loksabha and be a Member of *Parliament*. Fun fact :- The President can also appoint a person as PM or any minister ,even if they currently not a member of Parliament but only for a period of six months . If within six months they dont get elected to either house then they must resign . 2:45

good work. Union council of ministers are not appointed by the PM, but by the President on the advice of the PM :).

This was well-timed since I just recently listened to a video about the history of modern India's economy lol. Thank you for this informative episode. God be with you out there everybody. ✝️ :)

'Badly' was the first word that came to mind

@archismaanrudra876

11 ай бұрын

Not really, but sometimes yes.

@chrismathewjoseph1283

11 ай бұрын

Atleast we never had a military coup & stood on our feet to a point of actually preserving a democratic system. Name any other country which hasn't fallen into a civil war or a military coup, right after independence... The constituion & the machinery may not be the best, but it held us firm on our feet. Hopefully, its a matter of time where we outgrow those limitations.

@maquacr7014

10 ай бұрын

​@@chrismathewjoseph1283Australia. New Zealand. Canada. That is three countries at the very least.

@chrismathewjoseph1283

10 ай бұрын

@@maquacr7014 all 3 countries r still dominions of Britain, so aren't they technically not an independent republic?? 😹

@maquacr7014

10 ай бұрын

@@chrismathewjoseph1283 Lol that is not how it works.

Good video! But this doesn't go all the way down to village councils. You should consider making a video about how indian politics works.

00:04 India has a sovereign socialist secular democratic republic with a parliamentary form of government. 00:55 India is a democratic republic with a federal government. 01:53 Indian legislature is bicameral with Lok Sabha as lower house and Rajya Sabha as upper house. 02:41 The Indian Government works through the election of a leader to be the Prime Minister. 03:35 The Indian government consists of the Council of Ministers and the Judicial branch. 04:26 The Supreme Court reviews laws and ensures they don't violate the constitution. 05:12 States in India have their own legislative assemblies, some of which are bicameral. 06:01 Indian territories have their own local governments. Crafted by Merlin AI.

Indian States in their current Borders and State didn't existed in history because they are created by Indian constitutional order. Indian States Aren't Monoethenic, Monolingual, Mono religious. There are lot of disputes between states.

Indian Prime minister can be elected either from the upper house(rajya Sabha) or the lower house(lok sbha) and not just the lower house 2:34

@aaronnrodgers

11 ай бұрын

That's is absolutely incorrect. The PM comes solely from the lok sabha

@Fightm0nger

11 ай бұрын

@@aaronnrodgers PM Indira Gandhi's first term(64-67) she is from Rajya Sabha. Later she contested from Lok Sabha.

@strugglinggamerzone3399

11 ай бұрын

​@@aaronnrodgers our last PM Dr. Manmohan Singh was from Rajya sabha (upper house ) served from 2004 - 2014

@durgeshsss

11 ай бұрын

​@@aaronnrodgersthoda padh le...bolne se pehle Manmohan Singh was not a lok sabha member...he was from rajya sabha

Very well explained yet simple. The map shown is an accurate depiction of what is under Indian control. Brace yourself for "incorrect map" comments but what you showed is accurate.

police in india can be only controlled by state government, and army by central government.

@tagliafico385

10 ай бұрын

Excluding Delhi. Delhi police is run by the Government of India.

@cybersmite5002

10 ай бұрын

​@@tagliafico385home ministry*

@Rahul_Singh100

10 ай бұрын

Central Govt has its own Central Reserved police forces which it can deploy in any state when it wants. So no, it's not that only state has a police, central govt too has police.. These forces that Central govt cam deploy for internal affairs are called Paramilitary forces. Army is only for external.

@tagliafico385

10 ай бұрын

@@cybersmite5002 Yeah, so? HOME MINISTRY BELONGS TO WHOM?

@anupamsatpathi2071

10 ай бұрын

@@tagliafico385 central government, home ministry.

India has a Joint economy....but, we have to thrive towards an idealistic Socialist order constitutionally !

like mac ftom IASIP courtroom scene - awesome 👍

why do i have the feeling this videos gonna get a lot of views

its surprising how it is still working

Slight Inaccuracy: The biggest party in the lok sabha that has proven majority does get to chose the PM but, the PM doesn't have to be from lok sabha, He can be ANY Member of Parliament. Meaning he can also be a member of rajya sabha... Manmohan Singh was from Rajya Sabha, and he was the PM in UPA govt. Nirmala Sitharaman is the current Finance Minister and she's also from Rajya sabha...

My guy showing president house as parliament lol.

I genuinly believe if India became an Absolute Monarchy they would be by the far the most powerful country within 25 years, democracy is a flawed system that does not work in developing nations

@AKumar-co7oe

10 ай бұрын

Bullshit

Summary as I understand. People vote in the parliaments, the parliament vote in the PM and the president and the PM appoint other CMs while the president appoint the chief ministers in state?

@prateeksharma6706

2 ай бұрын

Actually chief minister is appointed by the legislative assembly of the state which is like parliament but of a state we have seprate elections to electe them

Kinda bad that I have to refer to a foreign channel FOR MY OWN COUNTRY'S GOVERNMENT but damn you did a great job explaining the basics! sigh wish our own media would be even half as good as you

@death_parade

10 ай бұрын

There are multiple Indian YT channels that have made better videos on the topic.

@studytime2570

10 ай бұрын

all you have to do is look. Also yt algorithm is such that you may not always be recommended the good stuff.

@t.s.p1864

10 ай бұрын

Bs dk bcoz you didn't pay attention in basic civics class, you are here simping over a yt channel 😂😂😂

@newUser-hc8nz

10 ай бұрын

This is taught in 7 and 8 class civics subject NCERT

@Dhruv-Kumar

10 ай бұрын

@@death_parade all are hindi videos. What about those who dont speak hindi

You've got the map incorrect

How does the uks government work 🤔

Unitary and federal? How? Federal that it is mostly a decentralize state and if its unitary is more centralize state so what is India more centralize or decentralize?

@prateeksharma6706

2 ай бұрын

Actually there are defined power for both central and state govt so both govts share power

Dear @khAnubis, Please correct the Indian map used @ 1:24, 4:34 in the video. The Indian map which you have used is wrong and doesn't cover our Kashmir state fully. Please correct this immediately. Other than that, you have done a good job covering the major aspects. 👍

@Lol-ud8cs

10 ай бұрын

Kashmir is India's anyways

India is a Union, which is different from a federal or Quasi federal state, like US UK, and any other. A Union is the strongest and most United form of a country. In Indian Union, there are provisions, for Inclusion of states, but not secession, like US. Like, Sikkim was not part of India, but joined later. Nepal and Baluchistan also offered to join, i don't know why but the government declined the offers. All in all India is an Unbreakable entity.

@prateeksharma6706

2 ай бұрын

In US succession is illegal

bro u really had to forget my boi ladakh?

Well dadra and Nagarhaweli, Daman and Die used to be two different union territories but became one few years back😀

Excellent video. Very well done.

Nice

BTW Dadra and Nagar Haveli is one single place. And Daman and Diu are 2 2 others.

Indians like here 👇

@henk-3098

11 ай бұрын

What if I'm not Indian?

@jensenjorshina9945

11 ай бұрын

@@henk-3098 then....don't like? Idk why is this soo complicated for you

@henk-3098

11 ай бұрын

@@jensenjorshina9945 that's racist dude

@jensenjorshina9945

11 ай бұрын

@@henk-3098 Tell me one thing that was racist about my reply.