2 years later, we learned the biggest difference is that one of them actually works :) Edit - 4 years now!

@sRocketScience

3 жыл бұрын

Yup haha

@qwertyeet

3 жыл бұрын

They pushed back starliner again

@falco3471

3 жыл бұрын

LOL

@Chaz___

3 жыл бұрын

Funny

@Cydonius1

3 жыл бұрын

came to make this comment myself, didn't leave disappointed

I feel like Boeing asks themselves "how can we make this the most possible expensive"

@johnpotter4750

2 жыл бұрын

Fail to get it work 16/08/21 Again.

@joshuaashton1929

2 жыл бұрын

NASA is a cash cow for companies like Boeing.

@ShssaelPerez

2 жыл бұрын

@@joshuaashton1929 I truly believe that is part of the problem, if Boeing was putting their won money in the line, I'm willing to bet things would be a lot different.

@joshuaashton1929

2 жыл бұрын

@@ShssaelPerez Even if it was there own money on the line, just look at the 787 debacle. The fact that they couldn’t get there new flagship airliner to work right just shows that there’s something wrong with Boeing right now.

“The refurbished dragon 2 capsule won’t carry humans again, but will be used for carrying cargo” Endeavor(crew-2) : *hold my hypergolic fuel**

@tommorriskutscher9084

2 жыл бұрын

Resilience

@zydurianASMR

Жыл бұрын

C206/Endeavour coming back for round 4 of crewed flight (Crew-6)

Let's just take a minute to appreciate the fact that Soyuz has a ~97% success rate... from 1000+ launches

@martins.9293

4 жыл бұрын

@Русский Паренёк i mean you didn't expect them to just send rockets to space for free did you?

@The_ZeroLine

4 жыл бұрын

Capitalism, baby. Only took you 50-100m+ dead citizens to figure out its merits. McDonald’s has made more profit in Russia than its rocket program has made off the US.

@OpenGL4ever

4 жыл бұрын

Saturn V had a success rate of 100 %. And 13 launches.

@TheMaijicalKingdom

4 жыл бұрын

Luiz Serravalle, Let us also understand that means 30 failures! I wonder how many of us would get on a plane with a 3% chance of crashing! If you fly often, say twice a week as many, many, many business people do, you’d die three times a year! Walk that off!!! Seriously though, it’s ‘bout damned time we got back in the game! And.... ... .. . . . . Thanx, Russia, we’ll take from here now!!! Now e owe them! We gotta start giving THEM a ride to work! Welcome aboard the Dragonpool! You can use the center lane even!

@zackworrell535

4 жыл бұрын

@@OpenGL4ever Russian N-1 Zero success. When its gotta be big its best to go 'Merican

3.5 years later and SpaceX is the only one delivering. This did not age well.

Now one year later, Crew Dragon has performed brilliantly. Starliner failed spectacularly in tests.

@williamhutton1752

3 жыл бұрын

I'd say more that it failed successfully

@jadennelson7886

2 жыл бұрын

Again

@dirktween244

2 жыл бұрын

Failed ? Intentional, is not "failed" ! btw Installation of destruct systems, is a "safety" requirement by others !

@darkfur18

2 жыл бұрын

@@dirktween244 even now, success is tainted by nearly an entire cluster of failed thrusters

NASA: No, your capsule cant fly SpaceX: Why? NASA: Becuase it has n o s e s

@greentea1396

3 жыл бұрын

well the abort motors will probably be destroyed when it re enters

@BenjaminKirbyTennyson0

3 жыл бұрын

@@greentea1396 omg ur here too?

@BenjaminKirbyTennyson0

3 жыл бұрын

@@greentea1396 um no

@Tsmiley_09

3 жыл бұрын

hi sfs peaple lol

@jac0b89

3 жыл бұрын

@@Tsmiley_09 hello fellow sfs player

So much for that “they won’t use the dragon capsules for crew for more than one flight” haha. SpaceX sure makes it hard for info videos to stay accurate for long.

@sirmoonslosthismind

2 жыл бұрын

nasa required every crew capsule to be new as part of their commercial crew contract with spacex. however, nasa discovered something in the contract they wanted to change, and spacex was only willing to go along with the contract modification if they also got permission to reuse capsules.

@gamerfortynine

Жыл бұрын

@@sirmoonslosthismind So... modyfing the contract was more important than arguing against re-use? Is there a point here?

2023, 4 years later, the SpaceX Dragon is a regular guest at the ISS, we had a tourism flight with it. The Boeing Starliner on the other hand still hasn’t done a crewed flight and I admit I often forget it exists at all.

It’s done! Congratulations to space x

@eoghancallaghy9254

4 жыл бұрын

Incredible

@shot1dr

4 жыл бұрын

Great Job SpaceX , Boeing Go Away U Suck

@nathanle-nguyen2026

4 жыл бұрын

Federal Bureau Of Investigation yes

@creativecorner2071

4 жыл бұрын

Woooooo!!!

@richardgrace4500

4 жыл бұрын

It's not done yet.. mow they got to get back without #1 bouncing off into space #2 burning up in the earth's atmosphere if they heat shield doesnt hold

I'm back here because I'm still thrilled that Tim is now officially friends with Elon Musk - great pre-launch interview!

@sonny3703

3 жыл бұрын

Ok boomer

@arandomcatwithinternet

3 жыл бұрын

Anonymous ummm they weren’t doing anything boomerish

4 years later spacex launched starship and more crew missions, nasa launched artemis, while boeing is still nothing

Its crazy starliner still hasn't carried people, and dragon has launched crew 6 and some private missions

We were very lucky that Dragon had delivered the crew capsule on time, especially with the current situation with one of the only countries that could get us to space before the Dragon

Simple. SpaceX will get them there today. Boeing will get them there when they run out of deadline extensions.

@meezalamazala279

4 жыл бұрын

Mars is more realistic

@jacobcastro1885

4 жыл бұрын

Snotty comments. Making KZread since 2006. 😀

@rickl.7084

4 жыл бұрын

Space X just delivered. Boing nowhere to be seen. Blue origin who?

@mike-0451

4 жыл бұрын

Rick L. I’m ok with blue origin. Boeing and Lockheed are corrupt as hell. I don’t trust those two.

@andrewadams8601

3 жыл бұрын

Boeing will probably end up saying it's more cost effective to take their contract and outsource to SpaceX...

Take a moment to appreciate the amount of information that has been put together in an easy to understand manner. Great content and even greater narration.

@arnoldmoontanman8638

3 жыл бұрын

I’m a new subscriber, he’s great at presenting! Hooked!

@miltonmiller

2 жыл бұрын

Tim is hitting the ball out of the park with every video. He doesn't f&ˆ%$k around!

@eleventy-seven

Жыл бұрын

I like Everyday Astronaut. However his pandering to NASA has to be moderated when he is getting handed lies from Bill Nelson. You owe it to your viewers to stop blindly accepting the BS. Artemis is in big trouble Bechtel has messed up the mobile launch system and the next one is years late. Your narrative is part of the reason so many go to Florida to be disappointed over and over.

@-108-

Жыл бұрын

Tim's a talented kid and has his schitt together.

I didn't realize the Soyuz was SOOO small... The CD looking pretty luxurious right about now.

Hi we just watched this video and NEEDED to let you know how impressed we were. Your knowledge and presentation was incredible. You were thorough and direct. We know it is a year old but now we understand what happened today with the launch. Thank you for sharing your obvious passion in a way that was easy to understand and digest. We really hope you were there today to witness the launch in person.

@morris.d5562

Жыл бұрын

Hi Gayla how are you?

The cockpit of the Boeing Starliner is just like Boeing’s aircraft. Complicated

@guywithoutaname1163

3 жыл бұрын

The fact that your pfp is a plane makes me believe that you know what you're saying

@lordawid

3 жыл бұрын

and spaceX is Airbus.

@theamazingparkerC

3 жыл бұрын

LorDawid yep

@matthewolivier2883

3 жыл бұрын

Agreed, its like they took a space shuttle cockpit and shoved it into a crew capsule. Very unimpressed with the design and a bit perplexed at how it can possibly cost more than SpaceX's equivalent, even though Boeing is using a rocket from an entirely different company.

@Swanlord05

3 жыл бұрын

It's more mechanical..... I like that

Is anyone here after watching the Falcon 9 launch?

@russianbear420

4 жыл бұрын

That would be me lol

@buzzmas8068

4 жыл бұрын

No. I am here before the launch

@cjmartin2596

4 жыл бұрын

Was a beautiful launch! So cool it lands upright

@randy7068

4 жыл бұрын

I am in 1980 and its fabulous.

@nutguzzler6479

4 жыл бұрын

Me

I can only imagine the work that went into making this detailed comparison. Love you, Tim. Thank you.

I realized TODAY, after watching for almost a year, that your eyes are different colors! Cool!

@c.i.demann3069

5 жыл бұрын

same! how have I never noticed this before?

@almondpotato9483

5 жыл бұрын

Crap. That's insanely cool.

@nikiwiki2006

5 жыл бұрын

Que Pasta? I keep thinking, he needs a shave!

@daviddow1257

5 жыл бұрын

Wait what?

@thestudentofficial5483

5 жыл бұрын

Holy sh

I would appreciate a compare and contrast segment on the various rocket engines being used today.

@danrowley6934

4 жыл бұрын

There is a video on the net comparing engines. Google it. Looks interesting but I've yet to view.

@ecoop20

3 жыл бұрын

@@grizzomble came here to say this

@damyr55

3 жыл бұрын

He made one, it's called "Is raptor the king of rocket engines?".

4 years on and they have stood down from the first crewed mission for July

That animation showing the different Atlas V configurations is *fantastic*!

Gotta respect the members of the Fire And Rescue Team! Not only doing good work, but simultaneously saddled with perhaps the worst acronym.

@doggo00

5 жыл бұрын

lmao

@MathiasKirk

5 жыл бұрын

F ire A nd R escue T eam this reminds me of another acronym fail within nasa

@rwhitenz

5 жыл бұрын

Need Another Seven Astronauts, Lived up to that one twice...

@bobbilaval6171

5 жыл бұрын

Ouch

@OldTantoGuy

5 жыл бұрын

🤣

Who's here after the Crew-1 launch? The new era is finally here....

@blood_boi6900

3 жыл бұрын

wow so unoriginal

@fullflowaerospace

3 жыл бұрын

Luke yes here we are!

@kryboard1723

3 жыл бұрын

@@blood_boi6900 thats more unoriginal.

@supersalty5856

3 жыл бұрын

they have launched 2 crews of astronauts bruh

@catdealer1144

3 жыл бұрын

shut up, man

"rapid unscheduled disassembly" Only SpaceX gets to say that You can't use that term while talking about Boeing

@kyleking3839

3 жыл бұрын

But it seems like Boeing needs the term rapid unscheduled disassembly way more

@adamrezabek9469

3 жыл бұрын

At boeing, no development is rapid

@Tulin258

3 жыл бұрын

At Boeing, it’s scheduled disassembly so they can delay it more

Thank you for your passion and quality delivery of these videos. I really enjoy your work.

Tim, This is one of very few times I have ever posted a comment on KZread. This analysis was great and must have taken hours to produce. JOB WELL DONE!!

@ree2398

4 жыл бұрын

@TAX COW FARTS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

@josephc6588

4 жыл бұрын

Dennis Calkins All talk no big Moon Rocket and forget the Mars Rocket even weaker than the 2 Space X is building now !

@ree2398

4 жыл бұрын

@@mock15halo JC ... wins

I’ll save you the time: Dragon works and Starliner doesn’t....

@emeraldstudios848

3 жыл бұрын

Yep true

@jonahsgang8830

3 жыл бұрын

I can’t argue with that

@matejmarosz20

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, and atlas and starliner look dated already, compared to spacex and and its semifuturistic Dragon and falcon

@Mcdouble123

3 жыл бұрын

Already halfway through so ima watch the whole thing lol.

@caseychesh

3 жыл бұрын

😆

Who else is watching this after the launch of Space X Crew Dragon! 🔥🔥

@rossdavidson5980

4 жыл бұрын

Yes

@matthewames2276

4 жыл бұрын

Same here!

@michaeljakus8373

4 жыл бұрын

me

@davidrichardson5368

4 жыл бұрын

Me!

@davidwilson3806

4 жыл бұрын

That...was...AWESOME!

Outstanding effort and video!!! No one ever knows how much work and time goes into a in-depth video program like this.. Very Nice Job Tim!!!

@GC-Haendlach

5 жыл бұрын

Sounds unlikely but I’m not going to listen carefully-sorry, but I don’t have more time

@jamesbonde4470

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah well, he gets paid by NADA for this BULL.

@BackToSpace

4 жыл бұрын

Totally Agree

I love how ‘customisable’ the Atlas V is! Like the naming N22 or the 442. Really cool

I was born in 1953 so I got to watch the space program start . I was as excited yesterday for the launch as I was when John Glen orbited the earth. Jumping up and down like a school girl is a little harder now then back then but I was doing it. Thank you for airing it live on KZread. I was able to get it on my tv. I’m watching them waiting to open the hatch at ISS. TY TY TY.

You deliver an excellent and professional production. Just want to say well done and thanks for all your hard work and the team behind the show. You guys bring space down to earth 🌎👍

@FlatEnough

5 жыл бұрын

blah blah blah, computer graphics and paintings and stories. PROVE THE EARTH IS A SPHERE FIRST, thanks-

@FinBoyXD

5 жыл бұрын

@@FlatEnough No one cares. Just go back to your never never land and dont come back.

@ketzalkiawitl

5 жыл бұрын

Idem dito

@11moonshot

5 жыл бұрын

@@FlatEnough Sir! There are qualified doctors for your specific mental symptoms! Please undergo treatment in a closed facility. Until you are successfully treated would you please refrain from unappropriate and silly comments?!

@11moonshot

5 жыл бұрын

...couldn't more agree!

That night picture of dragon with the crew arm gives me goosebumps everytime I see it and realize they are days away from launching that beauty

You are the first person I've watched, or haven't missed, that explained launch configuration and nomenclature, many thanks for that.

Tim: "You can't go wrong" with either spaceship. Well, that didn't age too well. Turn's out Starliner's valves can go wrong.

@morris.d5562

Жыл бұрын

Hi hope you are fine

Thank you for using the metric system!

@MarlonBitoy

4 жыл бұрын

What’s the Metic system?

@trevhedges209

4 жыл бұрын

MarlonBitoy metric.. sorry spellcheck correction, because Metric and Metic are actually both English words.. good catch though, I didn’t notice myself..

@quackywack9331

4 жыл бұрын

Well the metric system is universal and is the international standard so he must use it in his videos

@MarkMcDaniel

4 жыл бұрын

@@MarlonBitoy -- Base ten measurements vs feet, inches and miles.

@aquaticllamas28

4 жыл бұрын

Bob Soxs I love the metric system, except in aviation where knots is much better.

Smashed it on this one Tim. Really entertaining and didn’t move from the screen from start to finish. The SpaceX crew arm and internals looks sooooo COOL and thats important when trying to inspire people. Both vehicles are great and can’t wait till their launches. Great job!

Tim, WELL DONE! I thoroughly enjoyed your video, the graphics, the presentation and all the information. Although you are not in a studio per se, I do believe the video is clear, the audio is not distorted or choppy and overall, the edits and cuts are well done. Thank you!

clips of a shuttle launch will ALWAYS PUT A SMILE ON MY FACE

The main difference is that one is flying humans later today and the other one is figuring out guidance systems 😂

@CookieMonster3.14

4 жыл бұрын

*on Saturday 😅😅😅

@hemprope4326

4 жыл бұрын

@@CookieMonster3.14 hehehe

@whocares2277

2 жыл бұрын

One and a half years later: One is flying humans routinely, the other one is figuring out valve problems.

@hulk6315

2 жыл бұрын

@@whocares2277 ...still

@ryeb_

Жыл бұрын

...still (again)...

Yes! Have been waiting for this one Tim! Thanks for all the time and effort you put in! 🙌🏻 *Which of these is everyone most excited to see happen?*

@CKalitin

5 жыл бұрын

I think Curious droid did a video on this a few months ago but this is much better

@TommoCarroll

5 жыл бұрын

@@CKalitin Fair do's! Either way, it's great to get so much great space-related content from so many great creators, including Curious Droid! It's a fun time to be a fan of space travel!

@luism5514

5 жыл бұрын

Space X,

@rocketman48

5 жыл бұрын

Im more interested in seeing how SpacX does Boeing has lots and lots of backing but I wish them well as well Bill

@TheMixmastamike1000

5 жыл бұрын

I'm a huge Wayland corp fan Cough I mean space x but really I'm just excited there is a strong private sector presence in manned space flight where there is more value per dollar and less politics

thank you for the detailed info and fun to watch. About to see the launch now on Saturday, with much more appreciation and awe. bravo

The fact that Boeing was willing to launch People on that capsule in 2019 despite the immense list of issues is INSANE

Man I gotta say, any video over like 10 minutes heavily disinterests me from clicking on it, let alone watching it, but your videos are so intriguing that I don't mind how long they are. Keep up the great work, I have such respect for the professionalism and time you pour into these videos!

Great job, Tim Dodd. Just discovered your videos today and have already enjoyed watching two of them. Keep 'em coming!

This did not age well with regards to Boeing Starliner!

Love this. Thanks to you and your team for putting these vids together!

Outstanding video, Tim! I'm glad to see that the research made you see the Shuttle in a new light. Growing up in the 80's the Shuttle has been an icon of mine, and while it certainly had its flaws, it captured my imagination like nothing else could have. I was sad to see it go, but I'm more excited than ever for what's coming next, and your content certainly has a part to play in this. Continue the great work, Everyday Astronaut!

@benjaminbee4788

5 жыл бұрын

@Robert Willis fair enough, but Buran only had 1 successful orbital flight

I think as time goes on, the Space Shuttle will be appreciated more. With the first attempt at usability, astronauts, and unknown stresses on the vehicle at the time, it took longer and cost more to turn around than originally thought. The biggest flaw of the shuttle system was the orbiter needed to be placed on the side of the stack instead of on top. This made it impossible to do anything in the first two minutes in flight, (while the solids were running), to safely abort. The space shuttle may not have fulfilled it's promise, but in my opinion it was a spectacular machine and miss seeing, (and hearing), it launch.

@vinos1629

5 жыл бұрын

Many people forget that the space shuttle was actually pretty reusable at first , but after 2 disasters NASA raised refurbishment costs to make sure it wouldn't happen again , sadly that made the shuttle quite expensive and not all that safer

@RichardGreuel

5 жыл бұрын

I personally see the Shuttle Program as a complete disaster. The engineering that went into it was pretty cool, but had a lot of drawbacks. Please note that I said the program was a disaster. The shuttle that we got was a great example of a political failure. Because the congress wouldn't properly fund the program, NASA had to go to the military for additional funding. Not to defend the congress, but they had just finished funding the Apollo program and were a little tired of extremely large civilian space expenditures. The military said sure, but we have some additional requirements. These requirements included lifting extremely large payloads into orbit (nobody but the military / intel communities loft 50,000 lb payloads) along with a large cross range requirement. This made the machine so heavy that it required solid rocket boosters to get off the ground and the cross range required large wings. Because of these demands in part, we lost two crews. In the end, if congress had funded the program adequately, we would have had a much better design in all likelihood. The military ended up going back to traditional launch vehicles anyway long before the shuttle program ended. On the other hand, we did end up with a couple of nice side benefits from the oversized shuttle. Hubble was and is a great instrument that was possible because of the shuttle. And the International Space Station would look nothing like it does without the shuttle as well.

@pebmets

5 жыл бұрын

@@RichardGreuel Yes, the final design is not what NASA originally wanted. The biggest draw back which proved to be a disaster was the orbital had to be mounted on the side. If it were possible, (it was to heavy to do so), to mount it on top of the stack may have proved an escape for Challenger and the foam would not have caused the Columbia disaster. I believe that it were possible to have an abort from launch to orbit, the the shuttle program would have been still running or at least until a replacement was ready. The fact that there was no abort in the first two minutes made it difficult to justify after Columbia.

@TheEvilmooseofdoom

5 жыл бұрын

Probably the saddest aspect is that they had 30 years to evolve the design... and didn't.

@phoenixrising4573

5 жыл бұрын

The revolutionary nature of it's engineering does not mitigate the fact that it had several fatal flaws that killed 14 people. BOTH accidents come directly from those design flaws.

@everyday astronaut So, this is 3-1/2 years later. It would be VERY interesting to see an update to this. I'm not sure how much would need updating, but definitely the price per seat and the reusability sections. Great video by the way. I've watched a dozen of your videos since discovering you 3 weeks ago. *You and your team do really excellent work!!!* Great stuff, and thanks from Canada!

@Lost-In-Blank

Жыл бұрын

And as Chad say, the failure rate section should be updated too.

Just discovered your channel. I was a mid-teenager when Gagarin did his lap and have followed manned, oops, personed spaceflight ever since. These new spacecraft make this such an exciting time and with the internet and especially KZread, it's all at our fingertips. The absolute coolest aspect IMO is seeing the Falcon launchers backing down onto the platform at sea. Fantastic! Thank you for this excellent presentation and cheers from DownUnder.

Best video in a long time Tim! You're the best :)

You could fit all three spacecraft in the Space Shuttle's payload bay by putting Soyuz inside Dragon's trunk.

@Notjustjaiden

5 жыл бұрын

Rob Speed lol

@donogoobo9992

4 жыл бұрын

And you could load the shuttle, with the Soyus, dragon and starcraft inside of it, Plus SkyLab on a Saturn 5 rocket and put them all in orbit.(almost)

26:26 lol, that didn’t age well

@americankid7782

3 жыл бұрын

I feel like I missed something major

@theEWDSDS

3 жыл бұрын

What

@travelsofmunch1476

3 жыл бұрын

@@theEWDSDS Cuz human safety was not a priority for Boeing. The Starliner's flight test was an abject failure which would have but astronaut lives at risk. One bug would have resulted in the capsule and service module colliding, and this was only discovered due to searching after the Mission timer software failed and the ship couldn't reach the ISS

@ryandharwadker7508

3 жыл бұрын

@@travelsofmunch1476 you have no idea what you’re talking about....the software malfunction would not have endangered the lives of the crew. An elapsed timing malfunction would be fixed in seconds if there had been crew on board (and if not the LES would’ve been triggered) . The only reason they couldn’t fix it on the ground was bc they were between TDRS sats. Also, the capsule and service module would not have collided, but the service module ditch procedure would’ve executed a few seconds early, causing no major problems that would put the astronauts at risk.

@travelsofmunch1476

3 жыл бұрын

@@ryandharwadker7508 You can make excuses all you want about how they got unlucky between TDRS or how a human crew likely would have solved the problem. Those are both pathetic considering this was designed from the outset as an autonomous demonstration mission. A failure is a failure. It did not dock with the ISS and it did not succeed in its mission. And yes there are sources galore saying that the Capsule and Service module could have collided. In space your margins are paper thin and your acceptance of risk is exactly what kills people, whether it be 1980's NASA or 2019 Boeing.

THANK YOU for using metric AND including imperial for the rest of the audience. Blue Origin take note. PS: Your best video so far (of the ones I've seen).

NASA: Very impressive vehicle but... SpaceX: Go on NASA: Well... SpaceX: NASA: Its covered in noses SpaceX: I see it now

@scifisteve55

4 жыл бұрын

A massive abbreviation of my above comments!!!!

@BothHands1

4 жыл бұрын

😂 😂 😂 😂

@himssendol6512

4 жыл бұрын

Really takes “breathing fire” to a whole new level. 👃🏻🔥

@yifeiren8004

4 жыл бұрын

🤣

@epicolimeo961

4 жыл бұрын

=OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Thank you for this channel. You are always entertaining and informative. It's also great to see somebody do well at something they obviously love doing.

Wow! I just stumbled on to your site and comparison of the different flight vehicles. As much as I thought I understood what was what, you educated me to a deeper understanding and I just wanted to say thanks!

Fire and Rescue Team? FART?

@cloverdove

4 жыл бұрын

Bruh moment

@MAgaSUXX

4 жыл бұрын

Portable Oxygen Operations Team

@hetecks1385

4 жыл бұрын

@@MAgaSUXX POOT

@HiroNguy

4 жыл бұрын

@Truman’s Trumen I bet that requires some Super High Intensity Training to operate....

@MrBigbobsbeans

4 жыл бұрын

Where I live we have the “fox alpine rescue team” or Fart

I never thought I'd get to experience the feelings my parents did in the 60's, I'm so happy I was wrong.

@HiroNguy

4 жыл бұрын

And it feels great to actually be a part of it, albeit minor!

@johndecicco

4 жыл бұрын

@@HiroNguy I wish we didn't spend so many years with the Shuttle rather than interplanetary exploration, although it was fun working with Houston designing infrared heat sensors to see how much heat reached the back side of the tiles.

@charlesvanoldeneel9979

4 жыл бұрын

And I am so thrilled to experience all the circus again ! I was 21 in 69, when 'eagle landed' ... And now, after so many big rochets just burnt to ashes, see these boosters land so neatky on land or at sea .... Thanks from Belgium.

Good knowledge, without overkill on details. Great job. Keep the videos coming.

Seems I won't see a startrek ship in my life time lol, but I'm glad I belong to a generation who saw life in space.

I think that it might have been interesting to also compare the two new crew capsules with the Apollo and the Chinese capsule in addition to the Soyuz and the Shuttle.

@starleigh6680

4 жыл бұрын

the shenzou?

Great work Tim! Really good, detailed and well thought out video. I appreciate all the effort you put into it. Really hyped for Demo 1. And the Abort Test. Hopefully we will actually see a crewed flight to the ISS in 2019. From both Boeing Starliner and Crew Dragon. Also great work on the Nusantara Satu Mission live stream.

Brilliant commentary and information Tim. First time I've seen your work, excellent mate! You know your stuff and we really appreciated your knowledge. Tanks for sharing your interest.

What an amazing video. Thanks so much for putting it together. Your knowledge on the subject matter is mind blowing. Your passion for space travel is truly inspirational. 10 out of 10 👍

I like how fair this was to shuttle, considering how different of a system it was to current capsule systems

@LPMutagen

4 жыл бұрын

Seth Baker I would be curious to see recovery costs factored in. Shuttle lands at a facility. Land based mobile recovery has a decent amount of logistics. ocean based recovery requires the Navy, which can't be cheap.

@terrestrialcreature7481

Жыл бұрын

@@LPMutagen But doesn’t SpaceX have ships of its own? Anyways refurbishing the shuttle was very difficult and expensive. It had like 17,000 little custom heat shield tiles to replace and tons of certification. I’m sure that the refurbishment made it a lot less cost effective.

My dad worked on every shuttle mission till the challenger disaster,broke his heart,so he moved into new engineering.Its great to see new companies and ideas being put into use.

@intent2leavematrix939

5 жыл бұрын

Most of them are still alive and kicking.. Check it out

This is like "Motor Week" but with spaceships instead. Good work!

you did a great job on this, and everything you do, but you really explain things in an understandable format

Incredible! And now, they are at the Space Station!

@patrlim

4 жыл бұрын

Few minutes!

@warrenayres200

4 жыл бұрын

@@patrlim it's in 4 hours and 30 minutes

@potato_men1358

4 жыл бұрын

This time when they start launch ship i will sleep😞

@rawandrew2361

4 жыл бұрын

I clicked off of it to see this vid😂

@blue-bz5jv

4 жыл бұрын

@@rawandrew2361 same im so excited

havig'sng been 10yrs old when NASA put Apollo 11 on the moon and my being a space geek as a child I grew up with an eye toward spaceflight. Then, after Apollo 17, everything seemed to just STOP with the exception of Skylab. I am so excited about NASA's plans with Space X and Boing's Starliner except the launch dates for human spaceflight keeps getting pushed back. I believe we were originally told 2017 and are now in 2019 I find myself anxiously waiting for 2024. I can't wait to see the US back on the moon with manned moon base as we prepare to launch from the moon to take us to Mars. It's an exciting time for space geeks to be alive as long as there are no further delays. I'm 60 now and I want to be around for the next chapter in Lunar space flight!!!

I've been 'binge' watching your videos the last few days. Great job Tim! And, let the Iowa show ;)

Title revision suggestion: How SpaceX *DID Get Astronauts to the ISS

@pedromigueldinis

4 жыл бұрын

or how spacex fakes a live stream

@MyThoughtsAndI

4 жыл бұрын

pmdleiria dinis ??

@cliftonjames785

3 жыл бұрын

@@MyThoughtsAndI hes one of the tards that believe there is no such thing as space

@MyThoughtsAndI

3 жыл бұрын

clifton james bruh moment

@plainaviation

3 жыл бұрын

pmdleiria dinis weirdo

People forget a little too easily how truly incredible the space shuttle really was. It’s been fashionable for us space fans to write it off for the last few years. But what people need to remember is that the guys who built Apollo, they were the ones who built and designed the shuttle and they were OUTDOING themselves. They were making the vehicle they had always wanted to make! A vehicle to build a human presence and manned architecture in space rather than something that was single purpose like the Saturn. It was literally the most ambitious thing NASA ever did and while it fell short of the dreams in a lot of ways, it was still a BADASS freakin spaceship!

@pebmets

5 жыл бұрын

Rory Shields, you hit the nail on the head. Thank you. I think people forget when the shuttle was built, it was something that had never been designed before. To prove it could work, Young and Crippen flew the first mission not knowing if the vehicle could safely launch and come back. Imagine the trust and faith with the engineers and designers to get in something totally different not knowing how it would react. That shows the amazing work these people put into building the shuttle.

@Papershields001

5 жыл бұрын

pebmets The Orbiters are still the only “Spaceships” that have ever existed. Everything else that’s flown has just been a rocket.

@musaran2

5 жыл бұрын

Except many Apollo designers did not like the STS right from the start. And with good reason : they got brushed aside while people with way less experience promoted something much more ambitious. Surprise, surprise, it was over-promised, under-delivered, an whack out of budget.

@Papershields001

5 жыл бұрын

Bruno Mailly did you ever see it fly in person?

@Papershields001

5 жыл бұрын

Bruno Mailly Because I can tell you that seeing discovery turn into the hack and hearing the double Sonics booms, watching how big she was and seeing how burned up she was after all her slashes through our atmosphere...you guys can keep your teacups with 2 or 3 PhD monkeys in them. The shuttle was one of the greatest vehicles ever imagined, much less created.

Love the fact that you use the phrase *"Rapid unscheduled disassembly"* instead of explosion. Keep up the good work Tim. Love your videos.

@e1123581321345589144

5 жыл бұрын

was wondering if anyone else caught that.

@Markus-zb5zd

5 жыл бұрын

It's a standard term as an explosion is usually a result and not a cause

Absolutely brilliant video. Congratulations bud and good luck with the channel.

Thank you soooooooooo much For detailing the rockets.

I would like to start by saying that I found your presentation very informative and insightful. Having been born in the late 60's I was lucky to have become aware of the world in time to catch the last few years of the Apollo program. As a child I was enamored with those rockets and the men who flew on them, brave men and a beast of a machine. I remember thinking how amazing it was that humans were in space flying to and landing on the moon. I remember our first attempts at long term habitation of space with the Skylab projects, and the transition over to the Space Launch System. I remember being absolutely blown away when they launched the first shuttle flight, it was the most incredible thing i'd ever seen. I remember watching the Challenger disaster on live T.V. and thinking that was going to be the end of the program. I was glad they kept it going. I remember when they launched the Hubble on the shuttle, and then go back to fix the damned thing, lol. I remember when they first started talking about building the I.S.S, and thinking to myself "can they really do that?", then a decade later there it was, and I thought to myself "wow, they really CAN do that". That got me starting to think that maybe we had a chance to get to Mars during my lifetime, and I gotta say, that got me pretty excited. Then suddenly the Columbia suffers damage on launch and crashes on re-entry, and again I thought it was all over. how can we keep flying to and back from space when we've now lost 17 humans in the process (3 during Apollo)? But, after the nation took a collective deep breath and a long hard think on the issue we kept going. Then out of the blue it is announced that the S.L.S. is being cancelled and that thought that we were finished for sure this time reared it's ugly head once again. I'm glad that we are developing this new generation of vehicles, and i'm even happier to see that private business is taking the lead to develop multiple vehicles. Thanks for taking the time to highlight each of these new machines and their capabilities.

@alexnowosielski43

5 жыл бұрын

SLS isn’t cancelled

@tymcfadden8496

5 жыл бұрын

sorry, I meant STS, got my acronyms mixed up, lol.

Tim, your comments of Starliner being a well thought-out and safe vehicle aged like milk, but I like your positivity.

@williamgreene4834

4 жыл бұрын

Ya we know how Spacex will get to the ISS but we aren't sure how Starliner will. Yet,,

@williamgreene4834

4 жыл бұрын

@EmperorJuliusCaesar It means if you put milk in a bottle and aged it like wine, it would not age well. At least that's what it means in the US. It's a pretty old saying though and I'm not sure where it originated.

@geraldgreen6794

4 жыл бұрын

william Greene Lol Idioms are fun.

@SkulShurtugalTCG

4 жыл бұрын

The hardware, at least, seems pretty safe. The fact that they'll be re-using the test flight spacecraft for the second operational crewed flight later is proof of that.

@joeyknight8272

4 жыл бұрын

@@SkulShurtugalTCG yikes a star liner fan

Awesome information . Incredible effort Todd. Thanks a ton. U have ignited the passion of space travel in me . I am loving it

Great chanel. Soft and understand talking and finally subtitles which are very helpful if something is unclear by hearing. Keep going ✌️

Crew Dragon looks like something that would fit in a Star Trek episode.

Thank you for that well researched and still very easy acessable & informative video. Those animations and transitions are also getting better every time. Keep up the good work and never stop to improve! Looking forward for DM1. Thanks! :)

You're super talented and I could not have been more impressed with your work. I'm amazed.

Him: "And you an tell human safety is on top mind for Boeing" 737 MAX: "And I took that personally"

This is honestly one of your best videos ever. I learned so much. Thanks Tim!

I'm actually surprised at the capability of the Soyus, considering it's history and design goes back to the 60s?? It's been a work horse of putting people into space. I'm very encouraged and excited more companies are getting into sending people into space both commercial and NASA funded. Hopefully we see more exciting missions, including other countries like India, EU countries, china and Russia. Exciting time to be a space enthusiast. :)

@brianchandler6127

4 жыл бұрын

Ya if you're a sardine

@QED_

4 жыл бұрын

@Brian Chandler: Soviet sardines wiped out Hitler's werhmacht. Same principle at work . . .

@rohanpotdar908

4 жыл бұрын

Well, technically it's been evolving across the past 70 years, and it's had some major changes (like analog to digital hardware), so it's a bit like Theseus' ship.......

@CR47Ycam

4 жыл бұрын

I love the soyuz for its history and its workhorse nature

@jaylan9162

4 жыл бұрын

Yah. It's like comparing the Mercury Atlas and today's Atlas 5. I mean, they kept the same basic architecture (cause it works) but it's a different rocket.

4 years later.... from one to two.

4 years and seems we see who is the winner

You explain thing really well and in a fun way, thank you for your hard work! :)

Someone needs to ask Elon if the dragon will have cup holders just for kicks

@lukekieburtz4323

5 жыл бұрын

no, but it will have a flamethrower

@chrishitchens9646

5 жыл бұрын

Yes

@nasaman5440

4 жыл бұрын

🥤space soda

@rickrutledge9363

4 жыл бұрын

Maybe the Tesla Dragon will come with an optional 'Ludicrous' mode to make it win the Space Race!!

@charlestorruella8591

4 жыл бұрын

It does you didnt see them when he was showing it off a few years ago

Thanks TIM for the best KZread channel covering all the space accomplishments in the world 🙏🙌👍 regards Andreas from Sweden

That was very very good buddy well done ! Enjoyed that a lot Tim .

Well done. Clearer explains a complicated subject, and looks good doing it.

When I get the notification you dropped a video, I drop what I'm doing to check it out! Thank you for this in-depth outline of the new commercial crew program vehicles. You rock!

@SWRaptor1

5 жыл бұрын

BTW, I love the graphics!! You did an amazing job for real! The 30 minute video length was also a huge plus! I love detailed videos that get in to the nitty gritty.