Very insightful thank you for the content

The 1L engines seems to consume a lot as well when driving in mountainous areas compared to 2L. I think they are designed mostly for city driving. The 1 litres also vibrates a lot.

@caseymachoga8908

2 жыл бұрын

It is because 1l engines work overtime on mountainous areas and 2l deliver power effortlessly and yess I agree with you that they are designed to be city cars and they also vibrate a lot due to being low on torque As it is a 1.0 engine after all

@snowypetal1

2 жыл бұрын

I thought I was mad when I asked the dealership why my car sounds like a dues truck 😂😂

@itwasag.ijanejoke386

2 жыл бұрын

@@caseymachoga8908 no they not low torque they have a flat torque output of 175 nm from 2000 to 3500 thats more than most naturally aspirated 1.6 liter cars , the vibrations are due to the inherent imbalance that come with 3 cylinders

@khutso9694

2 жыл бұрын

These 1L engines are a scam, even when driving in the city it will be averaging 6.2L as opposed to the claimed 5.4L Eintlik the 3 cylinders are a scam, I'm getting a young 4 cylinders car as soon as possible

@portman8909

Жыл бұрын

Well yeah. Driving on mountains is not a normal driving condition for the majority of people which this car is aimed towards. However even on steep hills it has no problems due to the turbo injector.

Love the south African practical tests sweet and short video

My 1.0 TSI 70kw Polo is averaging 5.9 liters combined long-term, but I am pretty gentle on the gas pedal and it is a 5 speed manual

Very realistic test. Sorry for commenting late, Am new to the channel am still catching up Morena

I've also noticed. I drive a t cross 1.0 r line . It's good local. But long distance fuel drops like a rock. You can get good long distance range if you drive at 110km/h or less. For a 1.0 L it has good power though it will be fun to exercise it

Great video

Until the car reaches 1000km the engine run in procedure is complete. When you were driving the oil pump etc and other parameters of the engine is still in the engine run in phase. Soo increase fuel consumption to help engine get up to temp and the extra drag of oil pump full pressure

I have been waiting

Depends how you drive really and type of terrain you driving in, plus I see you driving between white river and hazyview, my 1.0 liter manual averages 4.8l/100km, the lowest I've gone is *2.8l/100km* with an average speed of 100km/hr driving from the M1 to N1 then to william nicol drive

Hey , please review the 2021 facelifted toyota fortuner 2.8 gd6 exclusively, danko.

No one reviews cars better than this guy here in SA.

Last month i averaged “4.1L” on my 2022 POLO life DSG But in average im always around 6.0L to 7.5L when driving 30 minutes, I live in Johannesburg south and work in CBD.

Why was the avarage speed with the GTi lower? Was there a bit more traffic? If thats the case it means the GTi could have returned a much better economy than the 1litre.

Your videos are too short😭

I recognise the road u were driving.....White river>>>>>hazyview I'm from bushbuckridge.

I guessed it right... Not bad, considering the hike of petrol

Decent consumption. For comparison a current gen BMW X3 20d got me 5.8L with 80% highway driving. Diesel cars are still king when it comes to fuel consumption

I get 5.8 with my 2018 Polo Tsi Comfortline

Lol my polo vivo 1.0 TSI GT doesnt even get any closer usually around the 7 litre mark

Not bad! Want a 2nd car Etios. My mk7 gti Performance pack is starting to not being nice on fuel. #safuelincrease

@mathemankwana

2 жыл бұрын

Love your channel!!🔥

@TorqueDriven

2 жыл бұрын

@@mathemankwana thanks glad you love it! Stay tuned for more 🙌❤️

@TorqueDriven

2 жыл бұрын

@Akhile Mcimeli are you using it as a daily? And what’s your average on fuel

@TorqueDriven

2 жыл бұрын

@Akhile Mcimeli thanks. I really thought it’s good with fuel.. my other option is a Kia picanto

With 2021 Maual Polo R line 1.0 TSI I can push the average to 3.0L @ 70KM/H distance being 275km

average confuse me, please help

I took one of these 1.0-litre TSI polos for a spin around a parking lot, turbo lag for days or was it just me. Indeed, it seems that engine capacity is inversely proportional to fuel consumption on the open road. You have to maintain a larger throttle opening and higher average rpm to maintain your cruising speed

@MuziSambo

2 жыл бұрын

Turbo lag!😫😫

@snowypetal1

2 жыл бұрын

And me who drives with aircon on... Feels like my Hyundai i10 Grand handled aircon driving better 😂

Meaning there’s no reason to buy polo r line or life. We must all go for polo gti

@caseymachoga8908

2 жыл бұрын

Plus price wise they don’t really differ buh you should consider thinking of the maintenance on the gti before u purchase it as it won’t be as cheap to maintain compared to the r line that’s where car dealerships catch a lot of people on maintenance remember car affordability doesn’t mean just being able to pay installments on it buh being able to maintain it aswell should things go wrong with your car mechanically etc insurance ,fuel

@45.cars.93

2 жыл бұрын

@@caseymachoga8908 jah true only maintenance will be the problem

@portman8909

Жыл бұрын

Eh no. GTI insurance is a fortune and burns through fuel fast.

Where’s our new car 🚘

@raphaeltladi243

2 жыл бұрын

On the ship 🚢

Where is ur polo gti

@MuziSambo

2 жыл бұрын

I'm getting a brand new one next week.

My GTI is on 8.2 lol

@MuziSambo

2 жыл бұрын

I get that with city driving

@oomstu

2 жыл бұрын

7.1 for me

Are you a trader?

@mvalson7663

2 жыл бұрын

Lol. I don't think he owns every car he reviews. He probably goes to these VW dealership obviously using the numbers that he has on KZread to ask them for a car to review as this will also benefit the brand in sales. Also, I think he has one custom number plate that he switches onto these cars for the reviews.

@PeakProfits

2 жыл бұрын

@@mvalson7663 lol you missed the point. There are words he said that made me ask this question, but it's fine

@MuziSambo

2 жыл бұрын

😁😆"Technical analysis"

@mvalson7663

2 жыл бұрын

@@PeakProfits Hehe I must've really miss it

@PeakProfits

2 жыл бұрын

@@MuziSambo lol

It's saddening that with R100 you can get 4 litres

@robintyson591

2 жыл бұрын

Just wait until July!!

So I was 1km off in the range.. 👌🏽

@MuziSambo

2 жыл бұрын

My 95km guess was also close...😊

@Chuene05

2 жыл бұрын

@@MuziSambo Your guess is actually very close because you chowed 6.435L during the 99km journey, slightly more than 6L

@Dav973jack

2 жыл бұрын

@@MuziSambo that's what people that come second place usually say 😂

@MuziSambo

2 жыл бұрын

@@Dav973jack 😁💁‍♂️...This guy!😂😂😂

It would be interesting to do that test down at sea level i.e Durban. Perhaps the low altitude pressure and denser air will help. Otherwise I don’t know how you can comfortably reach that 5.4l/100km 🤷🏾‍♂️ even with a thoroughly run in motor…

5.4l is complete bullsheeeet 😑

First one to watch

L