Need a followup video on "how to encourage team members to open-up/speak"

You know humanity is bad when we have to research the fact that people that will listen to one another will accomplish more and work better.

This video helped me to understand how to build a perfect team for success, how team members have to interact and how google does it.

Great tie.

Learned a new word 'ostentatious'. Appears to be so what others want to view. Diagnosing such characteristics requires special skill. Nice point. Regards

I suggest audiences directly find the relevant presentations offered by the staff in Google Human Operation department.

QUESTION: What are your thoughts on the 'equal speaking time' when it comes to online teams? For example, if there is a "team chat" through Google chats, or something similar. How would this effect teamwork when it came to amount of posts, length of posts, ext. Thanks for everyone's input!

Well said !

Sir my 2n a half year baby keep on saying colors song but your Google is not able to understand her voice pls help her

the A-Team was the best team. Copy that

great

Interesting - it really makes sense!

@1:51 No Moss Interview question

Nice

this is good information

@alexmurrow2757

3 жыл бұрын

this is a factual statement.

Correctly said, when all TEAM members speak the same amount, then only it is a good TEAM. Generally this trait is not seen in organizations. People good in politics, speak more then others, and so easily control the whole discussion for their own benefit. TEAM Leaders and Managers are responsible for such management, and they are not able to.

Skull ties, really?

The word ‘perfect’ is scary. Perfection is not real

Considering Google has a monopoly on the world's consumer information and during the last 15 years it has been growing just the same as the average of the tech stocks in the S&P500, it's a massively underachieving company. I would take recommendations on how to build effective teams from companies with a growth rate that beats the market instead.

Ask Timnit Gebru how great it is to work at Google. . .

Appling yours 3 points and getting good result

GOOGLE YAY

Ostentatious listing can of course appear patronising and irritating if it is not supported by actual listening...

So in other words...Communication?

Wow - super interesting, but contradictory to much of what I've heard so far. Everyone else says that mixing different people together is also very important, but the also acknowledge group behaviors and culture. This theory only acknowledges behavior and culture, which might be rather limiting. not sure I can trust one single study conducted by Google. Doesn't really prove anything to me until I see it with my own eyes.

@biss224

Жыл бұрын

3 years on from your comment but here's my take on this - having a mix of different people with varying personalities and cultures definitely can help as it adds many alternate perspectives that each problem can be tackled from. However, I think psychological safety and the stuff this video talks about overshadows that side of things. You can have a successful team with psychological safety even if everyone is from the same background, but a cultural mix could never become an outstanding team without psychological safety. Combine the two and you create a super team.

hi class

OSU BusOBA 3230 😂

who is here from 3100 am i right

Le Christ 👀

#nosurprise! #google just reconfirmed 40 years of research on the concept of trust. Psychological safety is nothing more and mostly created by #trust.

In other words, if everyone has the same political mindset.

Dude you literally said what everyone knows u just use bigger words than others.

@GadoDesigns

5 жыл бұрын

wow Google must be so dumb that they wasted money researching something that "everyone knows"!

@wafihs

5 жыл бұрын

Yet not everybody is doing what everybody knows, some leaders didn't even listen to what the others said, some members of the team even try to pull the others down. Which will create a team without a psychological safety. My point is: yes, probably we know that psychological safety is a need or that's common sense, but not everyone is fully aware of what they know. Moreover, not everyone understands how important the psychological safety is. Other than that, I don't actually think all people knows how important it is. Knowing is one thing, but knowing how relevant or important it is, is another thing.

@christinenewton6618

4 жыл бұрын

Agreed. 'Ostentatious listening'?? Ummm, sounds like active listening to me. And I've been teaching that to my college students for YEARS. (Having said that, I completely agree that the composition of the team is less important than team processes when it comes to reducing conflict.)

@khadijafarooq5860

4 жыл бұрын

@@christinenewton6618 yeah but the point is using data to come to a conclusion. This is supported by hard facts and numbers rather than "I think" or "it seems to me"

G’s plan

Is it me or does this guy look stressed out of his mind?

Leave it to a bunch a IT folks to spend hours, dollars and various resources to arrive at a conclusion leaders already knew....leadership is about relationships. Great job!