My dad served in one of these during his military service in east germany. When we talked about the BMP, he also noted that for training they used a computer simulation, as ammo was apparently to expensive to train with.

@randomname4522

2 жыл бұрын

around what year was he trained in?

@iszox2973

2 жыл бұрын

@@randomname4522 in the late 80's probably around 88-89

@saveimageas...9352

2 жыл бұрын

@@iszox2973 makes sense , soviets were running on fumes at that point

@gipsydanger1394

2 жыл бұрын

@@iszox2973 yea that checks oout

@miroslavdockal9468

2 жыл бұрын

We fire sharp rounds to the end, in Czech Republic.....BMP is the same amazing platform like Hind or T72 was....not the best, but ....one feel so mean to be there with this machinery....

This is the boy right here. Even if he ain't that good; he is still the boy.

@maxinewulf4195

2 жыл бұрын

>w

@DarthCody700

2 жыл бұрын

Ain't that good? I find it's honestly better than the Bradley once you get the missile upgrade.

@localmilkman3917

2 жыл бұрын

@@DarthCody700 bradleys much safer and more space

@DarthCody700

2 жыл бұрын

@@localmilkman3917 I meant in War Thunder, I think I'd rather be in a Bradley in real life. In game though the Bradley has better depression and thermals, other than that, the BMP is a better anti tank weapon.

@localmilkman3917

2 жыл бұрын

@@DarthCody700 nah the bradleys auto canmon is a beast

I served in a Finnish panzerjaeger company in 2010s and my Command platoon had a single BMP-1 attached as a command tank. Having driven it, I can attest that it is very easy to drive, though it's cramped if you are above 180cm tall. Vision is pretty good using periscopes, though probably not up to modern standard like a CV90 or a similar vehicle. Carrying 8 jaegers is impossible and even 6 fully armed guys is a stretch. It was a command tank so we didn't need the capacity that much but it can't compete with more modern IFVs in this regard. Protection is also lackluster, we were told 7.62×54R armorpiercing can penetrate the side armor at close ranges, though it's still better than the MT-LBs. Finnish BMP-1s had their ATGMs detached and that role is instrad relegated to jaegers. Thus the tank only operates its main gun and the MG, but it's perfectly fine against IFVs and emplacements. The explosive power should not be underestimated. Never had any breakdowns and the mechanics said its pretty easy to maintain. It has plenty enough power to pass through forested areas and the top speed can be reached on roads easily. It's still a perfectly serviceable vehicle, though it really can't be upgraded. I wish there were more light cannons like the 76mm on IFVs, autocannons are great but a bit more punch here and there never hurts

@jintsuubest9331

2 жыл бұрын

The armor rating of bmp1 are 20mm AP of it's time at the upper slope point blank. 12.7mm AP at is belly 100m. 762nato AP at the side less than 100m.

@kimjanek646

2 жыл бұрын

@@jintsuubest9331 19mm at 60° is gonna stop a lot more than just 12.7mm AP, which is rated to pen like 6mm at 60°. Unless the BMP-1s armor value in-game are incorrect, which it seems they are.

@khahinmetameta7826

2 жыл бұрын

The BMP 3 takes the firepower to the next level

@kajmak64bit76

2 жыл бұрын

@@khahinmetameta7826 100mm HE+ATGM gun and 30mm autocannon coax With 7.62 coax too... that's a lot lol

@khahinmetameta7826

2 жыл бұрын

@@kajmak64bit76 light tank

It took many years for me to learn that BMP is Boyevaya Mashina Pekhoty, which literally just means Infantry Fighting Vehicle. I guess it really was the first, so that's a deserved name.

@TheSuspectOnFoot

2 жыл бұрын

Military hardware tends to be named either in a very self-explanatory and simple style or pompous and flashy fashion for propaganda purposes.

@seemslegit6203

2 жыл бұрын

Wow, the fact that I, a pole, could figure out what the russian means. Like, the words are so similar. The polish equivalent would be bojowa maszyna piechoty (though we don't call it that)

@shepardpolska

2 жыл бұрын

@@seemslegit6203 we kinda do, mashina can mean car, which could make it Bojowy Wóz Piechoty

@LitlBlackDragonNinja

2 жыл бұрын

@@seemslegit6203 News flash kid, the Eastern/Central European countries share a common ancestry which are the Thrace and also thanks to Medieval Bulgaria to spread language and culture to your region and Russia's, many things in the culture and language are the same. What is hleb in Polish? Bread, right? Same here.

@ruslankazimov622

2 жыл бұрын

@@seemslegit6203 these words are also semi-modern military terms and hence why you can understand easily. "Machine" is universal term.

People often give it BS cos of fuel tanks in back door... BUT... Those were ADDITIONAL fuel tanks, for prolonged drives. It was clearly stated not to go into battle with those full. There were some records that the crews before the engagement would empty those and put sand bags inside sometimes. So, it was perfectly safe. Plus, on top of it all, the fuel is not that easy to ignite despite what people think. For example, Swedish S-tank has additional fuel canisters on its side as additional - armor! They clearly stated that never during the testing did any of the hits set it ablaze, despite testing it with all available ammo types at the time.

@TwixSvK

2 жыл бұрын

That fuel could save you as it slows down the bullet.

@AHappyCub

2 жыл бұрын

So thats why my German BMP-1 survived a hit to the rear by a Soviet BMP-1, it didnt even caught fire

@deadmangaming2535

2 жыл бұрын

@@AHappyCub it does make for some hilarious team kills in sim battles though when I try and confuse enemies who aren't paying attention and catch them with their own spells 😂😂

@MsBloodyFox

2 жыл бұрын

That plus if you get hit from behind your all dead or near death anyway.

@kacper38

2 жыл бұрын

Fuel is a very wide term. We need to distinguish diesel from gasoline. One is hard to light on fire and second can explode just from ignition of its gases.

"When you have acute radiation poisoning, it's a BIT difficult to fight" Does dying in your own vomit count as fighting though?

@starliner2498

2 жыл бұрын

Fighting yourself, yeah

@Martin.8i

2 жыл бұрын

Fighting for your life

My dad was a BMP-1 Driver in the GDR in the late 80s. From what he told me , was that the BMP-1 REALLY loved to jump. If you went over a hill crest a bit too fast , you would have your Training officer siiting in the commander seat , rigth behind the driver , bash you over the head for damaging the vehicle. And there was also a problem with the tracks. Due to their design , they could easily slip off on quick turns in mud or soft dirt. But would be just as easily put back on. In general , my dad loved driving the thing. Funny part is. He received his training for the BMP-1 in Lithuania , arrived in the GDR and found out that his base , didnt have BMP-1s , so he had to be retrained for a Rescue vehicle based on a T-72A. Pretty much a tank without a turret with towing equipment. Mastered it aswell.

Clearly it was good enough to create an entire class of AFVs, so my guess is it was goddamn terrifying when it came out-not because of what the vehicle could do, but because of the doctrine the vehicle enabled.

@ruslankazimov622

2 жыл бұрын

But honestly BMP look like soviets looked at LVT (landing vehicle, tracked) and thought ...if this thing is an amphibious vehicle with some land driving capabilities... what if we have a fire-support vehicle that also has some amphibious capabilities?

@andrewgause6971

2 жыл бұрын

That was my take away from it. It was the doctrine, not the vehicle itself.

@jarink1

2 жыл бұрын

The BMP was made in response to Soviet doctrine at the time of planning on having to fight in a chemical or nuclear environment.

@plasticide4095

2 ай бұрын

BECAUSE of what these vehicles can do. Keep in mind that this is from the 70s, when USA only had M113 APC to contend against it. You dont see many of these in service, but this, even though poorly treated, still runs, that speaks volumes about this vehicle. BMP-1 is terrifying, for its time. Ofcourse it cant match modern IFVs, but for that time, it was the most advanced thing in the world in its class.

@RichelieuUnlimited

3 күн бұрын

@@plasticide4095One on one it’s inferior to the Marder IFV, which was developed around the same time as the BMP-1. (Development of the Marder started in 1959 to address the shortcomings of first true IFV, the HS 30)

The BMP-1 is probably my favorite Cold war vehicle. They look awesome, they are small, but pack a huge punch. I recently painted a 15mm motor rifle platoon complete with three BMP's. Love em!

@eduardkalmanawardze

Жыл бұрын

M1 all the way for me

My dad was a motor infantry platoon commander in the USSR. his platoon used BMP-1s and he said it was god-aweful to ride in the crew compartment so he would climb to the gunner position and sleep there leaning on the padded scope.

@muzikizfun

4 ай бұрын

I was in the US Army and before the M-2 Bradley. I drove the M113 APC. It was easy to drive and maintain and was fun to drive. A good driver learns how to use tricks for smoothing out rough terrain and making the ride much smoother than the BMP. The APC wasn't an IFV, but the M-2 .50 cal wasn't a slouch when covering the infantry. Like all light armored vehicles, if you acted like a tank, the odds were you would catch an RPG and end up a hunk of melted aluminum.

Another excellent video! On the subject of auto-loaders, David C Isby in his Weapons and Tactics of the Soviet Army, relates that the auto loaders on Soviet tanks was the primary source of sopranos in the Red Army chorus. Thanks again!

@ausintune9014

2 жыл бұрын

no, the tank autoloaders were very reliable.

@76456

2 жыл бұрын

Please tell me, did that American ever been in a russian tank. The carrocels were reliable that even United kingdom while projecting the ENT MBT they decided to put a carrocel like on the soviet tanks. But the project didnt went anywere. But they used a lot of it in Challenger 2 built

@brucermarino

2 жыл бұрын

@@ausintune9014 I think it would depend upon the model, these were early devices.

@brucermarino

2 жыл бұрын

@@76456 I think it depended upon the model. These were the very early devices.

@ImprobableMatter

2 жыл бұрын

That joke doesn't make sense, though... I presume it's trying to imply that their testicles got caught in the autoloader, but that would have to happen before puberty.

There was a lag factor too between mechanized infantry and the tanks. A lot of the mechanized infantry vehicles would go slower than the mbt's. You were often restricted in speed to the speed of your slowest vehicle. So they had to make something fast that had some survivability until it reached the enemy trench line. They wanted it to arrive when the t62's and 72's were engaged with the front positions of whoever they were fighting. I was a passenger in a BMP as part of our training in the 90's. It must have been gotten from Egypt or another client state. It was very cramped inside. The rear door has the fuel tanks on them, and they were made to swing out and be held open to the sides, so that someone with an RPK or something else could stand behind them and give covering fire as the vehicle advanced. You couldn't really see much out of them. A riser stood in the middle of the crew compartment with a bunch of batteries mounted on it. The tracks were kind of narrow. It could support a squad and knock down buildings with its main gun. Main gun in turret seemed cramped, hard to use and cheaply made.

For that time this was great vehicle. Could take out MBTs while other nations had 50cals. Also the ability to swim is underrated imo.

@kajmak64bit76

2 жыл бұрын

Everything Russian/Soviet can swim because of European rivers and stuff... there's plenty and being able to swim is a huge strategic advantage

@TwixSvK

2 жыл бұрын

@@seanmurphy7011 With 3km range atgm you have much better chance than 50 cal

@jacaredosvudu1638

2 жыл бұрын

@@kajmak64bit76 the brazil gang agrees with this mentality

@kajmak64bit76

2 жыл бұрын

@@jacaredosvudu1638 oh bruh xd

@YamahaR12015

2 жыл бұрын

Meh, swimming is kind of an overrated ability. Yes with all the European rivers but meanwhile Nato could literally pull bridges out of their ass so swimming was deemed pointless

When the BMP first stormed the battlefields of Egypt, western designers were so taken aback by it that many designs were modified. For example the marder was modified to take a Milan missile in the commanders position due to the BMPs malutka missile being shown in Egypt to have…some effect.

I've always dug the BMP just for looks. It's low design and those sharp angles just give it a nice presence. And for sure like you said Spookston, the historical importance can't be understated. Even if not the best IFV, the Russians got their first, and forced everyone else to start developing them. Great vid and look forward to the next one.

@Lofi.z34

8 ай бұрын

The hull of this thing is anything but low, lol. It's a blimp with a tiny turret on top

"If the BMP didn't exist, we likely wouldn't have a Bradley or Warrior today" Alright lads, that's #2 on the time traveler list

@fulcrum2951

2 жыл бұрын

Please no

@TheCurrentRacerReal

2 жыл бұрын

What’s number 1?

@Zorro9129

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheCurrentRacerReal Depends on who you ask, but everyone has a number 1.

@starliner2498

2 жыл бұрын

Don't you dare hurt my BMP

@crimsoncrusader4829

2 жыл бұрын

the west german already made the first IFV with the SPz 12-3, although the American and British ended up responding to the soviet BMP rather than their german ally's IFV

Before the video: BMPs are moving gas tanks/ coffins. After the video: They are decent I guess.

@ira3452

2 жыл бұрын

I love them

@jintsuubest9331

2 жыл бұрын

Engineers knew what they are doing, who would have thought.

I remember playing amra 2 on that weird random game mode just cruising in my bmp doing those random missions. Pretty damn fun.

I really love your historical videos, keep up the good work man 👍

BMP ain’t that bad if it’s still in service in some countries.

@devendoffing7004

2 жыл бұрын

So is the M5 Stuart, so the Stuart isn’t a bad tank?

@hickspaced2963

2 жыл бұрын

accessible does not mean good

@jamegumb7298

2 жыл бұрын

@Kwoney True, but the reason for that is the ground is soft enough in those areas to sink tanks, so they use the very light ones to have heavy fire support anyway. The heavy modern MBT's they do have are not numerous and cannot be used all over.

@ahmadutyakapeanutusa6135

2 жыл бұрын

some?? there are thousands still in service

@qwertyuiop5530

2 жыл бұрын

Poland has a few of them. But they are (at least planning) going to modernise them.

Its still kinda actively used in some reserve units here in Poland bc our ministry of defence has this bs policy that all ifvs should swim as first priority and "Bewup swims!!! 1!" is a huge meme here. Edit: Bewup comes from the translated name Bojowy Wóz Piechoty and is just phonetical way of staying BWP. It is literaly translated Bajowyj Mashyna Piechotyj (BMP)

@jacplac97

2 жыл бұрын

Huh, guess that's why we never got them Bradley bois.

@talltale9760

2 жыл бұрын

If you’re going to make something light it might as well float I suppose

@vaclavjebavy5118

2 жыл бұрын

@@jacplac97 or literally any other country on Earth, for other reasons as well

when people say that the BMP-1 and BMP-2 are outdated, you remember that a huge part of the states still use the M113...

@Channel-23s

Жыл бұрын

Not currently or as a main or important part and not as much it’s a Apc that isn’t being made rn or gonna be used in the future in Any serious measure as for the BMP1 that’s obsolete and a piece of junk in 2023 it’s a far from wanted or loved at all and used as a last and empty resource aka result hell there’s BMP2s-BMP3s Kugernats 25 and you pull out the ancient antique BMP1 something ain’t right using 60+ Year old IFVS.

@rikstanken3048

Жыл бұрын

@@Channel-23s Apparently, you haven't read the memoirs of people who fought in the Donbas. Besides, where do such conclusions come from? And you judge by logic: "old means useless." Then why are some NATO countries still using the "death boxes", the M113, which were used in the Vietnam War. The answer is simple - there are plenty of them in warehouses, as well as Soviet BMP-1/2 and BMD-1/2. Therefore, it is incorrect to call the BMP-1/2 a piece of junk, and "Kurganets-25" is written the way I wrote it.

@rikstanken3048

Жыл бұрын

@@Channel-23s Old weapons are never useless, they are always used. For example, many military engineers thought that the RCG-3 grenade, developed in the 1950s, had already outlived itself by the appearance of the RPG-18 "Fly" anti-tank grenade launchers, but the war in Iraq showed otherwise. This pathetic grenade forced the Americans to carefully use HMMVW and install additional protection from the damaging cumulative jet (In 2008 alone, 79 successful cases of the use of RCG-3 by Iraqi insurgents were recorded). Now the RCG-3 is also being used, and by two sides in the conflict. In the Russian army, they are often dropped from quadrocopters on Ukrainian T-64BV, from which tanks Ukrainian tankers throw their damaged tanks.

@Channel-23s

Жыл бұрын

@@rikstanken3048 old does mean bad in a way and the APC is still used as it’s a armored car basically and better then nothing but far from happy aka why Bradley and others are being sent and rn no same person will say IFVS or MTLBS from 60+-73+ years ago are great and what soldiers want due to how worst the technology is and hence why 2-3 replacements and upgrades were added it’s being thrown out when you’ve got little to nothing or want to save the better equipment for something important rather then a meat grinder or stalemate

@Channel-23s

Жыл бұрын

@@rikstanken3048 you bring up a grenade and I agree and don’t at the same time as a weapon is different from a IFV with outdated use or else they wouldn’t have made so many variants Russia has the BMP Terminators it’s another spin on it and the different Kinds Russia has made but when you have more getting blown up or captured and it takes some time to make of course you’ll pull the relics out it’s like America using Sherman’s in 2005 or 2010 rather then different tanks or the M1 Abrams Russia is using alotta T-62S when the T-72 T-80 T-90M and T-14 are already made and replaced it that’s 4 different Tanks after the T-62 (Ukraine has its own BTR-4 quite unique)

Hey Spook, would love to see you do videos for the rest of the BMP family too! theyre such awesome and unique vehicles

The flaring barrel on that tiger II that you ammorack in the last few seconds of footage is pure art

Lol, coincidentally, iv'e just re-read the main source of your information while taking a dump 2 hours ago. Thanks Mr. Zaloga!

enjoyed the video , you cover it well , have lots of experience with BMP2 , love, them

My dad was an anti-tanksman in the coldstream and said you can always identify a bmp from its cigar shape at the time they used the Wombat and Milan to shoot tanks

What a fascinating vehicle, great video!

I have to say, i really like your Videos, because you dont only compare the tank on a tactical Level, but also on the other 3 Level a tank needs to be good in. Namely strategical, economical and operational Levels which are often overlooked by other content creators. Just to clarify the diffrent Levels: - Tactical: How good it the tank against other tanks? - Strategical: Logistics and relaibility. - Ecomomical: How easy are losses to replace? Is the tank easy to produce? - Operational: What is the task of the tank? How good was it in that role?

@Spookston Great video! Only one thing though, 02:03, Object 911 was also a wheel and track combination vehicle. Rather than having deployable tracks like the Object 19, it had deployable wheels.

Always been one of my all time favourites with the M8 AGS.

great vid! perfect level of detail :))

So do you just add the crew sounds during editing or is there a pack to change the crew voices?

@KommissarH

2 жыл бұрын

It's a mod but it's private

@centurionmk5236

2 жыл бұрын

@@KommissarH i wonder if the game comes out if the mod will go public.

@w4t3rsn3k5

2 жыл бұрын

its just Gunner HEAT PC voices right? I'd assume it's all done while editing the video and such.

@groucho1080p

2 жыл бұрын

@@w4t3rsn3k5 It Is GHPC voice, but It Is a mod

@centurionmk5236

2 жыл бұрын

@@w4t3rsn3k5 no look at the description

The bmp is my favorite afv, I just love the look and the capability (tho I prefer the bmp 2). Sadly I don’t know too much about it. Great video!

I served in Finnish army when first BMP-1's entered Service. In 30 + years, problems were fixed but they were originally crap. 76 mm electric firing system was apalling. It was soon taken out from service. One BMP 1 burned because of electric fire. Design consept was (and is) good. Mechanical execution was not. Appart from vertical fuel tank inserted to rear doors, insanity or engineers revenge of not getting paid or something....

@snowball7990

2 жыл бұрын

There's nothing watching with the fuel tanks.

good outro music, and good info

would love to see some of your gameplay from time to time tbh, pretty usefull for new players as it can help you to learn maps and gameplay of the tanks, just a thought!

Congrats on 150k!

nice soundtrack you have in the back

Last shot was a good shot, very enjoyable 😄

Could you do: "How bad was the T-62/T-72?"

@hhale

2 жыл бұрын

Ask Iraqi forces that served in the Iran-Iraq War and most notably in the Gulf War. This of course assumes you can find some of them still alive. They faired very poorly against the M1A1 and the M60A3. CAS took care of many of the rest.

@cczevak5313

2 жыл бұрын

@@hhale The T-72 performed well in the Iran-Iraq war. The Gulf war was a different story, for many reasons.

@roadhigher

2 жыл бұрын

@@hhale Iraqi T-72's were dogshit. They were downgraded T-72A's with the USSR only exporting 3BM9 to Iraq for use on the T-72M. Even with those setbacks they did quite a number on Iranian Chieftains when those two encountered eachother. Though against the Abrams and Chally 2 their poor performance is to be expected. Iraq had poorly trained crews with Tanks from the early 70's with mid 70's ammunition, compared to the excellent US/UK crew training and most modern Tanks + Ammunition at the time.

@SatThuVoBui

2 жыл бұрын

@@hhale The T-72 performed very well against Iranian M60A1s. WDYM? Mentioning CAS is worthless because its completely irrelevant and has nothing to do with how good or bad the T-72 was.

@fernandomarques5166

2 жыл бұрын

@@hhale Iraq T-72 performed well during the Iran-Iraq War against Iranian Patton and Chieftain tanks. With most sources noting them as "nearly invulnerable" to rounds fired by Iranian tanks from the front.

I crawled around in one on static display at Ft Irwin in 87. I was impressed at the layout, compared with the M113. And the sharp wedge shape to the frontal armor gave it good protection.

Thanks for a new Video!! and I believe that I can say on behalf of the Community Thank You for all the super hard work you put into research of the Vehicles IRL not in War Thunder and that this series is both Informative and just really cool Thanks Again!!

i love it, one of my favorite IFVs of all time.

3:12 this makes me angrier than it should because it happens so often If you stay still you can't guide the missile If you move it will flail about with the hull wobble

The wheeled bmp looks kinda cool. Would be cool to see in game

Something about Ob'yekt 19 is really cool to me. The combination of wheels and tracks stands out, even though it is totally inefficient. Also, Is there any possibility you could do the AMX-13 and AMX-30 for your next "If "x" was historically accurate in War Thunder" videos? I miss those a lot, and I'd love to see those two tanks broken down.

What I love about the BMP-1 is that is that it only weighs half as much as a Marder 1 probably even less when considering the later versions with more armor.

Cool thanks for reading the wiki page for us 😎

I'm learning English and this channel seems to be the place to challenge my listening skills, Spooks talks so fast I can't even hear sometimes, like in the 2:21 part Still it's an interesting channel tho, instantly subbed.

@parrot849

2 жыл бұрын

Yes he has very good information to put forth on this channel, but he continues to handicap the general quality of the channel by butchering the meter of his speech and smearing words together, especially when specifically describing technology. I have found by adjusting the speed setting on channel it makes it possible to digest the information and get all the dialog. And English is my native language. But it is nevertheless a fine channel and he puts out excellent content.

Good video, that being said Object 911 isn't really a fully tracked design. It would move only on its track in combat, sure, but it actually had four retractable wheels while it would use for redployments and such on road. As such it basically is a convertible wheel-cum-track vehicle like some had existed during the interwar

I love how this video uses the same thumbnail as the "if the bmp-1 was historically accurate" video but mirrored.

swimming military vehicles always have such pleasing lines

3:10 that IS-6 had no clue what was going on.

You can’t expect the revolutionary thing to be perfect from the start

Very solid video! Such a thorough and balanced review of a vehicle in just 5 minutes. Top!

The most important think is that it swim :D

Finally somebody made a video very impartial...

I just realized that you killed me in my AMX 10rc , thats crazy

In real life we used to want to see these on the battlefield. I flew gunships and scouts in a prior life and seeing them helped us understand what unit we were fighting. Also easy to kill with tows.

@fuzzdad2

2 жыл бұрын

@@nemo5335 My job at the time was with the 2dACR...I was an Attack Helicopter Commander. My job wasn't to survive...it was to find and fix any enemy penetration. I expected to live about 48 hours max. By then the balance of forces would be in place to deal with anything. BTW...it worked out in the end because Germany was reunited (I was on the line when the wall came down), and the Soviet Union failed. So yes, the BMP was a forerunner of all fighting vehicles...but it was easily defeated.

@fuzzdad2

2 жыл бұрын

@@nemo5335 yup...I was also a personnel planning operations officer at USAEUR HQ in Heidelberg prior to my 2ACR time and our replacement planning models (lotus 123 spreadsheets baby) were rough to look at.

@jiridrapal7512

2 жыл бұрын

@@fuzzdad2 both sides were prepearing for enemie's attack, spending billions of dollars that could be used to enhance people's life. Just because both sides lived in utter paranoia of each other.

@specialingu

2 жыл бұрын

@@jiridrapal7512 in many ways i suspect it was the american military industrial complex wanting a bad guy so they could continue to make lots of money with weaponary.... rather than actual soviet aggression being realistic.

The first of anything is expected to be flawed. But the fact the changes were (relatively) easy to fix show’s they had a good thing going.

@jonny2954

2 жыл бұрын

Except it wasn't the first. He literally says at 0:22. The first IFV was the West German HS-30.

At a fairly hefty 6'1", that troop compartment makes me cringe... Given that there are vehicles that use fuel tanks for armor, the fuel on troop doors complaint seems a bit weak. ALSO, if an enemy is where he can get shots at the troop doors, the crew has worse problems...

@esanahka9284

2 жыл бұрын

If enemy gets to those positions you are kinda fucked anyway

@petesheppard1709

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly.

@esanahka9284

2 жыл бұрын

@@petesheppard1709 oh you edited your comment

@petesheppard1709

2 жыл бұрын

@@esanahka9284 Actually, no. I emphasized the last part because, like you, I saw a bit of a problem there... 🙂

@Drownedinblood

2 жыл бұрын

you're sitting.

fun fact: The BMP 1 was often called Kotzkübel by NVA/GDR soldiers, what translate so something like vomiting bucket. Apparently driving in difficult terrain was a bit of a rough one for the guys in the back. :D

Good vid. Anyway, i gotta schleep

About the gun's inaccuracy, it was meant just to cover the 500m deadzone of the missile, so accuracy wasn't essential.

Spookston I have a suggestion to make There is this Game called Sprocket and the Game is all about designing your own Tanks and such, I think it would be a cool video to have to see you make your own design Tank For example, you can make the "Perfect Sherman", a old video of yours going through all the Sherman models and their pros and cons to the previous model

Fun little fact. During the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan soldiers would use those rear door tanks to make wine. They'd fill them up with fruits and water, wait a couple weeks and drain the alcohol.

when your enemy shapes their entire armoured doctrine around your vehicle, you know you struck gold

Loved watching the engine on the BMP eat the shell from the Tiger 2.

@kajmak64bit76

2 жыл бұрын

It's possible tho?

Im fairly new, and after seeing cold war/modern gameplay, all i know is that, when using an IFV or light support vehicle, if the gun dont get em, use the ATGM

bmp was made for close quarters in city fights it was decent cheap and effective that makes it great tank

@nikitajukov4915

2 жыл бұрын

If ground vehicle which supposed to be disposable costs more then a jet fighter, certainly it is not cheap.

@serdarcam99

2 жыл бұрын

@@nikitajukov4915 bmp-1 has that only bmp-2 and others going on was effectively cheap

Using the object 911 in warthunder would have made a lot of people chuckle

KZread needs to get its shit together I was notified 4 days late to this video

In real life, the BMP-1 was brand new and scared the Western Powers. It was amphibious, could hold 12 people and was quite fast. But there were numerous flaws too, like fuel tanks in between the seats. (The West didn't know that though!)

1:49 the chat lmao

do you think the german puma ıfv will come in the next update? also ı love your vids!

Nice video. How about maybe how bad was the S tank video?

The complement troop looks like it would be hell to be stuck in for any period of time. So crampred .

I’ve always fantasize driving one of these in real life. Man it looks cool but I think I might be too tall for it

I talked with one old guy that server in BMP and to my surprisement he never saw the fuel tanks in rear doors as an issue

@louisbarraud7853

2 жыл бұрын

because they weren't filled with fuel in combat, crews were always told to drain them beforehand

@BOBO-xe6rl

2 жыл бұрын

@@louisbarraud7853 ah, good to know thanks

Babe wake-up new Spookston video dropped.

What is this outro music? It always sound sooo familiar

If you look at the object 1200 in the photos, it looks exactly like a BTR Chassis, wonder if that was evaluated for another competition.

Personally the bmp-1 is my favorite afv, but now you gotta do a bmp-2 video

One of the more interesting flaws in the design of the early models was the driving light on the front left of the vehicle was high enough that the gun barrel could knock it off. So the solution was to incorporate a "hump" in the turret ring that would force the barrel upward when in that position and protect the light from damage. It also made that forward part of the turret arc a dead zone where none of its weapons could be brought to bear. A flaw later fixed on future models. "Weapons and Tactics of the Soviet Army" By David Isby.

Gaijin could've added the BMP 1A1 Ost which is the BRD designation for the upgraded BMP 1 after the unificaiton, it modifies the tank to be up to date with the Bundeswehr standarts changing the appearance but also removing the atgm. So the resulting vehicle would be a unique vehicle that could be at a lower BR and not just be a copy and paste tank that shares the BR with the Marder 1.

I love this subnautica soundtrack!

Sees usage to this day. Yeah, a bit more timely than thought at the release of the video...

Amazing year to come to the field with 1969 nice

Once I was in the infantry compartment of an BMP-2 (i think they are the same size hull wise) without any equipment whatsoever and it was VERY cramped, especially for the feet. Note that im just 170cm tall and I wasnt wearing any equipment

Goodness! I haven't seen one of these tanks since playing Operation Flashpoint.

I feel like influence for the BMP would have also come from the lend lease M2 halftracks and German SDKFZ 251s. Both tracked, able to carry a squad of men, able to be used as weapon platforms and infantry could shoot out of the vehicle if needed.

@Namelessthe3rd

2 жыл бұрын

More than likely. Armoured Transporters were nothing revolutionary by the Cold War (heck they had APC plans for the WW1 Mark tanks), and both Russians and Germans regularly mounted very heavy weapons to APCs during the second war, using the platform as a base for large weapons. All you need is some designer, probably familiar with the soviet Tankodesants, to ask 'What if big gun, but also people?'

@ausaskar

2 жыл бұрын

The BTR-40 and BTR-152 had some DNA from WW2 combat transports but I feel like the BMP was a new beast entirely.

My father had his compulsory military year in communist Czechoslovakia (dudes who didn´t study at the university had 2 years of compulsory military service) in Czech part of the country, close to then West German border (Slovaks were mostly send to serve in the Czech part of the country and vice versa). He ended up in a mechanic team of BVP´s (BMP 1s and 2s, BTR-70 and their Czechoslovak version mostly, some Hungarian BRDM 1s and 2s). He witnessed pretty sick things there - one BMP 2 crew shooting dead another BMP 2 crew on night shooting practice, the crew of the first mistaking the other for a target as it lost its way and got lit by the target searchlights, illuminating the targets for the crews, another BMP 2 crew drowning while crossing a river and sinking, another time, crews of BMP 2s being sent out during the harshest winter and one crew freezing to death in their BMP 2. One BMP 1 or 2 crew taking their BMP for a ride to a local pub and intoxicated, leaving it in front of a pub, guns fully loaded and unlocked, another crew yet tried to cross to West Germany in theirs, to be pursued by half of their group (my dad wasn´t there, though), the crew surrending after a shootout with the pursuing BMPs in the Šumava/Bavarian woods, bulldozer hitting a V3S truck´s side, cracking it open and sending the left row of V3S travelling soldiers on the road, some simpler Darwin prize candidare peeps there heating up the ammunition-loaded V3S truck with gas torches and welding equipment, dudes who were Toluen-depended before the military service and couldn´t be entrusted an AK-47 rifle or a grenade - one dropped it in the middle of his group while throwing it - everyone ran for the nearest ditch quite quickly, stuff like that. The BMP2s are considered Slovak main battle tanks/light tanks to these days, with just some T72s in garages are last resort tanks, but some modernisation of the tank force is supposedly under way.

I mean since the BMP 1 is some kind of a both infantry support vehicle and a troop carrier i think it does its job well ofc not considering the issues,the cannon is quite effective against entrenchments and also infantry i take it as a plus

Oh how nice the damage used to be on the BMP's main cannon. And how straight the missile used to travel. I miss the old BMP-1.

0:39 which is why I say the Feature Creep Conference in Pentagon Wars was totally accurate... Other than the fact it wasn't in Russian.

this thing absolutely fucks me up

I hate looking like one of these kind of commrnts, but I would like to know your thoughts on the LAV 6.0. I personally love it and its prob my fav tank/IFV.

The BMP has always held a special place for me.

Anybody else half expect to see him using his decal on his newer videos?