Some notes on this video: First, off watch to other videos in the playlist, they’re awesome! bit.ly/Project_Revolution Second, a note about religion (this won’t go badly right?). When telling the story of the Glorious Revolution a lot of writers will present it as a Protestant vs Catholic story, casually placing Anglicans in with Protestants. There is some very good reasons for them to do this, it’s simpler and historically speaking there wasn’t the large division between the various Protestant denominations at this time. But, I think my viewers are smarter than most and can deal with the nuance, so I mentioned when people were Anglican vs Protestant. Anglicans diverged from the papacy in a very different way than other Protestants. Protestants, like Luther and Calvin, were challenging the policies and actions of the established Roman Catholic Church, they “protested” the church by leaving it on religious grounds. But the Anglican tradition is rooted with Henry VIII, who split from the papacy when the Pope refused to annul his marriage, the split came about because of political reasons. The resulting Anglicans had, at the time of the Glorious Revolution, a lot of comradery with other Protestants, but Mary, Williams wife, cousin and coregent, was an Anglican. She wasn’t just a good type of Christian (Protestant) but she was the best type of Christian (Anglican). Third, flags. You might have noticed I used a flag that looks like the flag of Luxemburg for the Dutch in this video. This is the “Statenvlag” and was the flag of the Dutch Republic at the time of the Glorious Revolution. The modern national flag of the Netherlands, officially introduced in 1937, is based on this flag. However, because it’s so similar to the flag of Luxemburg I didn’t use it in the thumbnail but used the earlier “Prinsenvlag”, this wasn’t in use by this time but it’s more recognisable and I guessed it would be more “clickable” on the thumbnail. So yeah, thanks KZread for making me less accurate in order to teach people things, sigh.

@AudioPervert1

5 жыл бұрын

Glorious Revolution?! more like tribalism .. repeating every hundred odd years. As for "teach people things" Reading verified history and research is better than cartoons and info-graphs.

@christianbadcock

5 жыл бұрын

Hello, could I have your email I wish to reach out to you. Business email is good

@DouwedeJong

2 жыл бұрын

Do you know the payout difference between an annuity and a bond? Till this day the reason for war boils down to the monopoly on violence. James II was caught in an arbitrage between bonds and annuities for war payments. It was never a civil war, he was bankrupt - that is all. We look back at history with terms like 'revenue' or 'governance' or 'religion' but the principals are forgotten - like with Tony Blair (the credit crisis of 2008 was postponed for war in 2004). James tried to make England a better country, that is not ruled by bonds holders or annuity insurers, but to trust the monarch - he tried to make it about god. Tony Blair did the same. Ironically, war bonds was issued by William and later slave bonds by George IV. Both was intended to finance the navy and never the subjects or victims. In both cases, bond yield was lower than annuities on risk.

I approve this message.

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Que Dutch national anthem.

@historywithhilbert146

5 жыл бұрын

😍😍😍

@robvoncken2565

5 жыл бұрын

@@Soliloquy084 MORE WILHELMUS

@l3quack

5 жыл бұрын

Why am I not surprises to see you here;)

@staszekr03

5 жыл бұрын

So basically after William the Conqueror came William of Orange. The last sucessful invasion of the brittish isles.

One of the greater things we Dutch did in history. Conquer England and let them believe they won. It's like a reverse Brexit

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks, and in my opinion the Dutch reasoning of the story is often left out.

@bearwolfable

5 жыл бұрын

u wot?

@daanwillemsen223

5 жыл бұрын

​@@Soliloquy084 True, you did a great job telling our motives. Keep it going :)

@daddyleon

5 жыл бұрын

​@@Soliloquy084 Which is always a shame, perspectives matter. Whether you're the winner or the loser, we can still make history more vibrant if we know these other sides too.

@sonicgoo1121

5 жыл бұрын

@@bearwolfable It's basic Sun Tzu: first make sure you'll win and only then send in the army. You might not even have to fight!

“Big Blue Blob.” *EUROPA UNIVERSALIS IV INTENSIFIES.*

@19MAD95

5 жыл бұрын

It calls.

7 Dudes : yeah well wanna be king? Dutchman : hmm 7 Dudes : we have a big empire including S P I C E S Dutchman : *Y E S*

@pvlgs

3 жыл бұрын

Dutchman: So do we

As a Dutchman I am forced to say this everytime there is a video talking about Dutch history: *G E K O L O N I S E E R D!!*

@memeraii

5 жыл бұрын

ah hier was ik al naar aan het zoeken

@steyn1775

5 жыл бұрын

@@memeraii ja landgenoot

@samuelclaessens7699

2 жыл бұрын

It doesn’t even have to do with history… everything Dutch: *G E K O N O L I S E E R D*

Video: is about the Netherlands Dutchmen: G E K O L O N I S E E R D Someone: says something about the Netherlands in the comments Dutchmen: Z E G M A K K E R

@GeraldoGamingChannel

5 жыл бұрын

r/cirkeltrek

@erwin2577

5 жыл бұрын

Z E G M A K K E R

@JuniorJuni070

5 жыл бұрын

Wat praat je nou weer voor kanker bullshit “ Zeg makker” hou je bek man met je makker

@erwin2577

5 жыл бұрын

@@JuniorJuni070 rustig aan het is maar een meme

@headcanon6408

3 жыл бұрын

England did get G E K O L O N I S E E R D

Great video! the glorious revolution is super underrated when compared to the Wars of the three Kingdoms or the hundred years war!

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Not enough battles for the map youtubers to put icons on.

What a glorious video and a glorious return for Soliloquy. :)

One of the most underrated revolutions! I've realised these are my favourite type of revolutions - not much violence involved and almost flies under the radar compared to the big boy ones but in the grand scope of things, ended up being pivotal! Good job on the video as well!

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks, there is certainly a tendency in history to focus on great battles and such, often the politics behind them are equally as interesting. However, a lot of "History" (in the classroom sense) is about building a national identity and battles and such lend themselves well to that. We also tend to teach about wars we won which helps, it becomes a story about how 'we' won and are the best and 'they' lost and are the worst, and here are our heroes who made the ultimate sacrifice for your nation so you better well respect it.

@bramchatrou472

3 жыл бұрын

As a dutch person i have to say, *AHEM The Glencoe massacre*

Great video and often a forgotten feat of the Dutch! Funny how in Dutch it is called the "Roemrijke omwenteling", doesn't really have the same ring to it as Glorious Revolution.

@thijsrikkerink6333

5 жыл бұрын

In Dutch we mostly call a "Revolution" a "Revolutie". Not an omwelteling. It is correct Dutch, though.

At this time, it's fair to say that England and the Netherlands were one country, but William didn't have everything go his way. He wanted the English army to help fight France, but instead the English pushed for an invasion of Ireland. William, being from the more religiously tolerant Netherlands, was willing to spare the Catholic Irish from land confiscations if they surrendered , but the English willfully ignored and broke that promise. And it's here too that England's institutions modernise by emulating the Dutch, while the Dutch from here on out go into decline as a major power. Also, the checks and balances on the monarchy not only frustrated William's plans for England, they also mark the definitive point where the English monarchy effectively loses their real political power, leaving the Crown as a figurehead and Parliament as the institution that held all the cards.

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

I wouldn't say they were one country. It's fair to say that England and most of the Dutch Provinces were in personal union but they were very separate nations and their legal systems were separate. With regards to Williams treatment of the Catholics, keep in mind the Holy Roman Empire was an important member of the Grand Alliance and was Catholic, William had promised Leopold he wouldn't persecute the Catholics in Britain and he couldn't really afford to lose Leopold's support. As you note the English were not really cooperating with this but William at least had to try and hold them back.

@HarrowKrodarius

2 жыл бұрын

We can basically say we installed the Ways of the Dutch and they started to take over.

@Jimmy-1919

Жыл бұрын

​@@Soliloquy084 do you know much on henry booth, the first earl of Warrington at this time? I found it interesting as we both share the same last name even tho there most likely no relation.

Never heard it from the Dutch perspective before. Always just assumed he did it purely for the sake of being King. Great video!

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah I think it's a great example of how we use history to build national pride. We (anglophones) focus our story on the role of the English politicians, emphasizing the parliamentary supremacy aspect and minimizing the no freedom of religion aspects.

@Tommy-dz3do

5 жыл бұрын

Stefan Milo Hey nice to you see here Stefan, big fan of your content xD

9:00 "The dutch declaration of independence". The declaration of independence is actually based on this, so the American Plakaat van Verlatinghe would be more accurate.

7 representatives.. like 7 kingdoms? An enemy from a across a narrow sea? Invading with his army.. and taking the Iron Throne!

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

It's a carefully chosen number ... gods number.

@jossecoupe446

5 жыл бұрын

A Dothraki horde Ned...ON AN OPEN FIELD

5:23 I don't see why Louis XIV was trying, you only only get BBB before 1500

@MrKholishUmar

5 жыл бұрын

Damn those aggressive expansion!

@mikado6407

5 жыл бұрын

xd

@aiman_oofed8186

5 жыл бұрын

M

This event is actually the start of one my favourite alternate history scenarios. If William’s lineage had continued, there’s a reasonable chance that the Netherlands would have been incorporated into the UK, which has a major impact on the history of the world. The UK and NL had the two most powerful navies of their time, and together they would likely have been even more powerful. This is helped by the fact that both navies were weakened in the Anglo-Dutch wars that followed. A stronger “UK” would have had a far higher chance of being able to quell the American Revolution. (As their inability to supply their forces played a major role in the Continental Army’s success.) On top of this, Dutch colonies owned by the VOC would be incorporated into “Anglo-Dutch Empire”, leading to a world where the Empire has a far greater extent than in our timeline. Looking further into the future, the British ban of slavery in the 1800s could maybe have reduced the mistreatment of people in Dutch colonies, although that can be debated since the British weren’t too kind to their own colonies even after the ban. The UK’s new land in the Netherlands would also greatly affect the events of WWI and WWII (assuming they still occur), as the UK may have opted for a less defensive campaign, given that they would want to protect the Netherlands. If Germany still follows their WWII strategy or our timeline, the successful invasion of the “UK” would likely be a bit of a morale killer. However, in this timeline the US - still being in the empire - would have been able to enter the war at full force immediately, strengthening the allied cause, and leading them to likely still win in this timeline. After the war, it is reasonably possible that the Anglo-Dutch Empire survives, given the fact that the US economy (fundamentally still part of the Empire’s economy now) would massively reduce the impact the war had on the “UK” government. Either way, there’s lots to explore here, which is why it’s my favourite alternate history scenario. One tiny change that was reasonably likely to occur, and suddenly the history of the entire world is different!

@SantomPh

5 жыл бұрын

The Dutch would not have a half-Dutch ruler in England claiming rule. Someone would tear the Netherlands away from the Willem IIi line and rule apart from them. Remember that Charles II fought two wars with the Dutch, so despite Willem being popular with Protestants there was still animosity against the Dutch.

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Also, keep in mind that William was Stadtholder (and not actually of all of the provinces, although of the one that really mattered), in practice this was hereditary. The Stadtholder was appointed and likely at some stage, the provinces would choose someone other than the British heir. The new King in Britain would then have a choice to press a claim on the territory, but that would have been politically difficult. There wouldn't really be any legal basis for Britain, the Act of Abjuration was clear on this. Also, the last King to rule over a Stadtholder was Spanish, claiming the Netherlands as a birthright might have been seen as a declaration of war on Spain as well. A Jacobite pretender might have been around in France too, and so the French might have seen an opportunity. That is to say that a British King could easily find himself at war with much of the continent, fighting the Dutch and Spanish in the low lands and the French and Jacobites in Ireland. You might end up with a much weaker British Empire rather than a stronger one, in which case I'd be typing in French or Spanish.

@Dave_Sisson

3 жыл бұрын

Excellent thoughts, but bear in mind that from 1714 the Kingdom of Hanover was in personal union with the Crown of Great Britain. As Hanover bordered the Netherlands, the combined British, Hanoverian and Dutch states would have been such a great power that even Bourbon France or Austria/HRE couldn't challenge them. That means the French Revolution could be squashed and the history of Europe (and thus the world) would be radically changed

Fun fact: The accession of William of Orange to the English throne established the doctrine of constructive invitation in international law, by which a legitimate government can invite another country to invade in order to depose an illegitimate leader. This was (to my knowledge) not used again until the US invasion of Grenada in 1983.

@Ggdivhjkjl

5 жыл бұрын

King James II & VII was the legitimate King of the British Isles.

@vincenzorutigliano5435

5 жыл бұрын

Juan Guaidó (Legal president) has been told by Venezuelans that he should request the US to invade and remove Maduro But he won't cause he's a weak dumbass

@BlueBird-wb6kb

5 жыл бұрын

Ignorant, That has happened in English history before , Back in the viking era of Wessex and York etc , rules would be asked to come over after a current one died

@SamAronow

5 жыл бұрын

@@BlueBird-wb6kb Inviting someone over after their predecessor dies is not the same as inviting someone over to kick their current leader out.

Well, I am slowly making my way through the Best of History KZread playlist and am now on number 30! Anyway, I gave you a thumbs up and subscribed. I teach this topic in both my World and Western history class, so it was interesting to watch a video on it.

This was really interesting, thank you!!

Yet again, a beautiful video by Soliloquy.

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Oh no! You missed the joke! This one is not beautiful ... but glorious! Thanks for watching and happy you liked it.

I am really happy that this collaboration happened, as I can take advantage of it by finding new educational channels!

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

And I'm happy to have you here!

This video was awesome!! Great job!!!!

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching Tasos Fran, I'm happy you enjoyed it.

Always nice when maps depicting the 17th century include the Noordoostpolder and the Wieringermeerpolder.

@r.v.b.4153

5 жыл бұрын

Groot-Urk zul je bedoelen!

Just found this channel. Great quality content!

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks, happy you enjoyed it.

Awesome video!

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching Darius O, I'm happy you enjoyed it.

Really good animation quality, the information is ofcourse what’s important, but I appreciate the effort put into presentation.

Hello soliloquy i luv ur vids so much

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Hi there TotallyNot Muqri, I'm happy you enjoy them.

As A Dutch Indonesian American I approve, also he looks handsome like me.

@stephenowens354

4 жыл бұрын

Fact is he was a small, hunched back, crooked nose, asthmatic - but nothing wrong with anyone who looks like that

@aymarafan7669

4 жыл бұрын

@stephen owens Haha yeah my comment is really just a joke cause I couldn’t come up with anything better to comment on sadly😔😅🤣🤣

More colors would make it Better. Good video!

HES BACK BOI’s

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

I never actually go anywhere, they just take too long to make :(

@bishops7828

5 жыл бұрын

Soliloquy you just made my day. Loving the content. Keep it up!

As it didn't show up in the video: this is also the event which brought this particular sense of the word 'revolution' into the English language - as satire. One of the Royal Society crew, cant' remember which, referred to it as the Glorious Revolution, on the grounds that once it was over everything was back where they started again; as in the revolution of a wheel.

The intro almost seems like a beginning of a logic puzzle.

The Dutch and the English (Brits) have much in common. It's a good thing.

One more thing: 9:09 The US Constitution is adopted on September 17, 1787. March 4, 1789 was the convening of their first Congress.

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah, for the animation I used the "effective date" for the US Constitution rather than the "ratified date", honestly it was a pretty quick decision and might have justified more thought if it wasn't for the collab deadline. In the grand scheme of things a minor issue.

By the command of History with Hilbert, thou shalt proclaim the House of Orange's Dutch tricolor throughout the land! Cue the Dutch Anthem meme.

@robvoncken2565

5 жыл бұрын

WILHELMUS MORE WILHELMUS

2:10 “ugh I’m dead. AlsoIBelieveTheCatholicWaysProtestantsSuuuuuck”

G E K O L O N I S E E R D

Should have done this before A level history exams last month mate

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

I never quite know what to make of these comments l, there are always going to be some people who could have used the video earlier but now its here and ready for those that need it in the future.

So cool to learn of my nation's history from the perspective of other countries. Of course I learned about it in Dutch high school but you can never trust your own countrymen, who made those lessons, to not be a tad biased.

As some guy who likes European history, it was pretty clear (for me at least) who this person was, along with Mary, Willem the III of England, and II of the Netherlands.

4:03 Father Ted reference

Sadly, the Dutch are often forgotten in world history.

@memeraii

5 жыл бұрын

thats not necessarily a bad thing tho. less attention=less people that hate you

@JustMois

5 жыл бұрын

@@memeraii even with the small amount of attention we get people still hate us

@memeraii

5 жыл бұрын

@@JustMois who?????????

@JustMois

5 жыл бұрын

@@memeraii germans call us swamp germans :/

@Gloopular

5 жыл бұрын

@@JustMois U need to defect to Friesland then lol

4:23 This lion banner >>>>>>> the Lannister banner.

That you The Netherlands

Careful now!

This video is about Dennis Bergkhamp

You didn' t even mention the battle of the boyne!!!

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

maybe a task for a future video, but although historically important for Ireland it's just a little out of the scope of this video.

@Soliloquy084

4 жыл бұрын

At least it got a mention in the next video.

king billy's on the wall 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

@theinternet206

3 жыл бұрын

King Billy was a fruit the loop 🏳️‍🌈🌈🌈🌈

I want to know more about your spelling tests XD

Hard to imagine that at some point England was ruled by a Dutchman... instead of Germans that rule it now or French that ruled it before or the Norman vikings that came earlier... xD

Someone I've been told I'm related to.

NO SURRENDER, LONG LIVE THE ILLUSTRIOUS MEMORY OF KING BILLY

@Fernandwinnie

Жыл бұрын

God bless the man in the black velvet coat. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

He certainly fitted in litterly. He was the first Queer King of the Protestant People of Britain.

Because we rule!

You should have put p. Rev intro

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

I think it was better to just get on with the topic.

@historiand9473

5 жыл бұрын

@@Soliloquy084 their is nothing wrong but i just think teams look good with their wear their colors on it.

*And then begins the Jacobite Risings*

Peaceful? The Battle of the Boyne was pretty violent.

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

That would be what I was referring to by violence happening in Ireland later.

@RMorgan97

5 жыл бұрын

@@Soliloquy084 Which then led to another 300 years of religious violence in Ireland... God do I LOVE my countrymen

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah, and a topic for a future video.

@PwnZombie

5 жыл бұрын

Rory Morgan Taigs out, no surrender!

@RMorgan97

5 жыл бұрын

@@PwnZombie Delightfully sectarian as that was, I'm actually born to a British father so it's a swing and a miss - enjoy the border poll when it comes!

Eeuhm we beat the english and french navy(combined) once and almost did twice if it wernt for one incompetant guy who ignored his orders. This was in a diffrent time period tho

William of Orange, the destroyer of Scotland’s independence 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

King Billy

Wha'll be king but Charlie?

@Ggdivhjkjl

5 жыл бұрын

♫ The news frae Moidart cam yestre'en will soon gar mony ferlie ♫

Next do one on how and Austrian painter became the leader of Germany

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Oh think of the demonetisation!

The best UNO card in history

@VanBurenOfficial

3 жыл бұрын

Does Y T S stand for Young Tenacious Swagger?

@hyort3613

3 жыл бұрын

@@VanBurenOfficial it was the username made by 5 years younger me. I don’t have a clue what it stands for but I do know that 5 years younger me is a weird fella

“Since Charles had no children” Well no legitimate ones anyway

The 7 like game of thrones?

What happened to the Dutch? Did William abandon them? Wasn't France trying to subdue the Dutch? William came over, but did he also bring any courtiers who became influential?

@MisterDutch93

5 жыл бұрын

William’s ultimate goal was to merge the royal houses of England and the Netherlands, making the Dutch Republic a vassal state under England via a Personal Union. This plan failed however because William could not produce an heir and he died childless. (Some historians think he was a homosexual or severely introverted, which didn’t really help either). After Williams death, the Dutch Republic went into the Second Stadtholderless Period, but later elected William IV, part of the ‘Frisian’ Orange-Nassau dynasty, as their new stadtholder (and therefore the direct male line of William of Orange died out). In England Queen Anne, daughter of James II, was crowned, and family ties between the two royal houses were severed.

@jemoedermeteensnor88

8 ай бұрын

The video doesnt make it fully clear but in 1672 the French and English formed an alliance against the Dutch. The Dutch barrely survived this. William III planned this invasion many years in advance, but the French having a war in the Holy Roman Empire ( so being distracted) was the main reason for it. Being invited too help the British people is most likely propaganda. After the succesfull invasion he modelled the country after the Netherlands. A national bank was founded, a the first stock exchange came a long and the parlement got influence ( which was exactly the same in the Netherlands, but it was called de raad van staat). An agreement was made that if he had kids they wouldnt be the first to the throne just like in the Netherlands. This all lead to the rise of England as an empire. (without this invasion, GB would probably have never been important) After stabilizing GB the Dutch+GB went to war against the French again for years leading to a slight loss for the French. In the end The Netherlands was saved from an expanding French empire. The English got reformed to the Dutch standards and in ~10 years they took over the Netherlands in being the richest country on earth.

0:21 *SUS*

The son was An Impostor

They was Kangz n sheit!

You don't mension the battle of the Boyne, unionists in Northern Ireland haven't shut up about it for hundreds of years

So that is why There is Anglicans in Northern Ireland.

@jemoedermeteensnor88

8 ай бұрын

This happened before this event. A lot of English and Scottish people moved to Ireland to convert them to protestantism. Most of them settled in Northen Ireland

If by first and only time this has happened in history, you mean a country having two regents, that is false, if you mean that two people invade and jointly become dual monarchs, then yes.

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

I kinda meant both, but specifically for England/Great Britain/United Kingdom.

@mybumbrash

5 жыл бұрын

@@Soliloquy084 ok because San Marino and Andorra have two heads of state.

@johnkilmartin5101

5 жыл бұрын

@@Soliloquy084 What about Queen Isabella and Roger Mortimer?

@Tevildo

5 жыл бұрын

@@Soliloquy084 Mary Tudor and Philip II of Spain were also co-regnant, but Philip ceased to be King of England on Mary's death, unlike William III.

@Meow_Zedong_1949

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnkilmartin5101 They were never monarchs in their own right but they ruled through Isabella's son Edward III until he overthrew them.

king billy's on the wall

@PwnZombie

5 жыл бұрын

Nathan Rainey there’s millions come to me see him...

"Hey let's not have war between Catholics and protestants " said the king. " fuck that!" Said the protestants. Thanks for ruining everything.

So he's William the 3rd?! British people are confusing with names. Lol

@jemoedermeteensnor88

8 ай бұрын

In the Netherlands he was Willem the 3rd, but he also was the 3th William in England. Dont think you can blame the British for this.

GOD SAVE THE KING

That William sold out the dutch and it is the time the Netherlands Lost lots of its power and trades. They should have stayed a Republic when William got older.

@jemoedermeteensnor88

8 ай бұрын

He didnt sell out the Dutch. He wanted to prevent a second alliance between the English and the French. And he succesfully defended the Netherlands against the French with the English support. But he did innovate GB to the point they became the most rich nation on earth which eventually lead to the Dutch down fall and the English rise to the number one position

So England got rid of their king because he was the wrong religion and wanted to pass freedom of religion laws? Sounds legit.

@colonelturmeric558

Жыл бұрын

There’s a lot more to it than that, it goes all the way back to the original celtic culture of the now english (most english people are more similar genetically to the welsh and irish than they are the saxons) and also the magna carta and the establishment of common law. Bet you didn’t know that a jury of your peers originated with pre-saxon era britain? We dont just stop our monarchs being tyrants, we force them to write new laws afterwards too. It was about more than religion

It saved England but it certainly also saved the Netherlands. Speaking French and attending mass doesn’t appeal to everyone I suppose 😄

A glorious revolution? Peaceful? It was definitely not peaceful in Ireland. It was this revolution that kickstarted centuries of bloodshed in Ireland....the scars of which are still very much evident in the community divide in Northern Ireland.

Didn’t guy fawkes lead to this

englisch kings were countless times appointed by nonenglisch origin.

@mankytoes

5 жыл бұрын

Since 1066 we've been ruled by the French, the Welsh, the Scots, The Dutch and the Germans.

@arthurheidt6373

5 жыл бұрын

@@mankytoes and also before 1066.

@mankytoes

5 жыл бұрын

@@arthurheidt6373 Norwegians, Danes, and more Germans?

@arthurheidt6373

5 жыл бұрын

@@mankytoes it actualy doesnt really matter the nobility clan was a international clan in itself, the british royal family maried before princes diana 400 years constantly abroad.

@colonelturmeric558

Жыл бұрын

Which is funny because we never were fully nay of those. Modern dna research has shown that most english people except for in kent are far more native briton than we are led to believe. Thats really helped for the past several hundred years to keep the countries of these isles at each others throats in bitterness.

*When you beat a country so hard that even the beaten call it the glorious revolution*

@colonelturmeric558

Жыл бұрын

Except it wasnt beaten, because the majority wanted the current king gone. If you punch a guy and his mates are like yeah just hit him again please, you haven’t beaten the other guys. That chang must be hella strong that you guys are smoking over there

@jemoedermeteensnor88

8 ай бұрын

@@colonelturmeric558 It just depends on how you look at it. You can factual say: England got invaded by the largest naval invasion until D-day by there Arch-enemy for the last century, which they had 3 major wars with in the 50 years after their official independence of which 2 they lost. After which the country was completly moddeled after the country of the invader

How could you be so insensitive as to upload this 2 days before White Rose Day, the birthday of King James III of England and VIII of Scotland?

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

It's a travesty, I guess the only solution is for everyone to come back and watch it then too.

BBB ......... EU4 calls me

I think you need to change the title. It must be how the stadholder of the Netherlands also become king of England. Because William 3 was certainly no ordinary Dutchman. It's almost blasphemy

Protestants Remember 1641

Je maintiendrai... Dutch?

@5thMilitia

5 жыл бұрын

Yes

@ludoviciusmagnus5125

5 жыл бұрын

@@5thMilitia not French? what about "Dieu et mon droit" or "Honi soit qui mal y pense". English?

@5thMilitia

5 жыл бұрын

@@ludoviciusmagnus5125 xD, its not dutch, but the first william of orange spoke french

@ludoviciusmagnus5125

5 жыл бұрын

@@5thMilitia i know, but just wanted to hear this from a Dutch. cheers

@5thMilitia

5 жыл бұрын

@@ludoviciusmagnus5125 why?

This is why I prefer the Spanish Empire 1 Catholic 2 Absolute Monarchy

@vincenzorutigliano5435

4 жыл бұрын

@Meneer Van dijk My opinion hasn't changed since I made this comment. Masonic Republics and Communist Tyrannies destroy human freedom.

@vincenzorutigliano5435

4 жыл бұрын

@Meneer Van dijk Phillip II was the best king. He established the 8-hour workday. British Ambition is what make the Netherlands break up. Remember that the current anthem reminds of the time before breaking up. "Wilhelmus van Nassouwe ben ik" "den Koning van Hispanje heb ik altijd geëerd."

@vincenzorutigliano5435

4 жыл бұрын

@Meneer Van dijk William was the traitor because he embraced the protestant heresy.

@aquahbanshee1954

Жыл бұрын

William was not a Traitor.,. he and phiilip where like brothers and he saw that what phillip wants dont work... so he had constant contact with Phillip.. Phillip was at a point insane and banned William this is the part when Wiliam fights back.. as Catholic...

Dutch cannot defeat the french navy willem de ruyter: hou mijn bier

You know there is an orange man in america now.his name is trump

its a coup

@sirmount2636

5 жыл бұрын

Basically.

Long live the King over the water

@Alan_Mac

5 жыл бұрын

There is no king over the water!

@PwnZombie

5 жыл бұрын

Papal absolutist monarchs shall never darken our proud British shores again!

@Ggdivhjkjl

5 жыл бұрын

@@Alan_Mac , yes there is - King Francis II, who calls himself the "Duke of Bavaria" to conceal his true identity.

@Alan_Mac

5 жыл бұрын

@@Ggdivhjkjl Imagine thinking that the "Duke of Bavaria" had any claim to the British throne. You clearly don't understand our constitution.

@wolfetone2012

5 жыл бұрын

@@Alan_Mac Which one? As the UK doesn't have a written constitution

First

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Stale Baguette beat you by 15 hours!

Quite unnecessary to show foreign religious symbols that didn’t exist in England

Because who doesn’t like the Dutch

FIRST

@Soliloquy084

5 жыл бұрын

Cheater.

@Ggdivhjkjl

5 жыл бұрын

No one cares. You just look stupid, but nice hat.

WATP ftp

Shameful act