so buffing the Comintern indirectly buffs the axis , great . makes perfect sense

@o0veigar192

2 жыл бұрын

My own theory for this as to why the axis did well is probably the allied AI itself now how does this work is normally the allied AI is always programmed to defeat the axis but the problem here is that there is also a probably a program that lets them evaluate who is the threat and none threat now here is a thing if you reach 1945 to 1950 the soviet becomes a threat now because the allies itself is already at war with the commintern they AI probably evaluate that axis is no longer threat and proceeds to focus on the soviet rather than the axis itself and you can actually see it that the axis was in a brink of defeat so the AI at that time probably think the axis threat is no more and proceeds to focus on the soviet

@MrRjh63

2 жыл бұрын

The main issue is China has a ton of manpower even with low conscription laws but lack the industry so they run out of equipment in extended fights and became a drag on the SU. Basically the SU was carrying the whole time fighting on 5 fronts at one point which bled them out.

@Tomoko_Kuroki888

2 жыл бұрын

Because they fought the allies too. The axis didnt have to worry as much while the soviets and chinese had to fight on 2 fronts

Biggest plot twist ever Sad that they lost tho

WOW! I can’t believe how that turned out. Thank you so much for the extra spice of having them fight everyone in 41’. That made the video much more interesting.

The various warlords all have industrial focuses, meaning that they will create more factories than just the Communists would, even if the Communists have all the starting factories. That means they can pump out more units. The longer build up to war might counteract that, but Japan also gets that.

I honestly cant believe how much this helped the Axis, especially Germany. I'm pretty sure it's because of Suez being blocked for Allied ships and bcs of the fall of Raj.

Pretty positive Africa killed the Soviet Union. If they had just set up a defensive line on the Suez Canal and sent the rest of their troops onto the Soviet front then it might have made a difference. As well, Japan likely tying up hundreds of divisions with constant naval invasions and the Siamese front likely meant the PRC had very little to send to the Soviet front, making them far weaker there. The AI just doesn't do well at protecting ports.

Why wasn't China given Tibet?

@michaelerlanger2797

2 жыл бұрын

Tíbet isn’t China

@anepicgamer2199

2 жыл бұрын

@@michaelerlanger2797 yes it is it has been ruled by China for many years Also the prc now has control of Tibet now

@Gustav_Kuriga

2 жыл бұрын

@@michaelerlanger2797 Oh don't start this shit. Whether or not it's core territory could be argued, but the PRC controls it. You're being willfully dense to say it shouldn't be included.

@zhangchiyang3005

2 жыл бұрын

@@michaelerlanger2797 This is basically saying Alaska isn't United State.

@rinject3686

Жыл бұрын

Becouse AI doesnt know thsy

Beautiful

What if germany controlled switzerland Austria czechslovakia and poland and western Russia and alsace-lorrine and Holland and Belgium and Luxembourg and usa

@aidrianyoutube

2 жыл бұрын

Haha, could be interesting if we make them declare war against all of their neighbors!

The only reason Comintern lost was because they fought the Allies Like bro why

@aidenbooksmith2351

2 жыл бұрын

China borders the Raj and France while the USSR borders Poland, and many neutrals who would join the allies if they had to which means they'll fight the Allies

@notmysteriousthief4629

7 ай бұрын

@@aidenbooksmith2351 He wasn't asking how, he was asking why, like why he would set it up that way because it practically guaranteed a sino-soviet defeat.

Based Hitlers gang

wut

Please video about iraq 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰