History of Impressionism with Philippe de Montebello at The MET (1994)
Ойын-сауық
Philippe de Montebello, director of the Museum of Metropolitan Art, takes Charlie on a tour of the exhibit "Origins of Impressionism."
Join us on Patreon! / manufacturingintellect
Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkou...
Share this video!
Пікірлер: 40
Join us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/ManufacturingIntellect Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/868d67d2-1628-44a8-b8dc-8f9616d62259 Share this video!
Philippe de Montebello is such a knowledgeable man, and is a real pleasure to listen to. I learned a great deal from this video.
@madArt1981
29 күн бұрын
Knowledgeable? The reason why the impressionist painted outside was because of the developments of the Chisel Paintbrush, The metal Tube to store paints, the new pigments available and the new portable easel. Not that nonsense Montebello rambled about
Thank you so much Philippe de Montebello! This tour was lovely and informative. And your work with the museum is itself a national treasure. You've not only inspired me to re-examine familiar paintings, but to incorporate art history into my everyday life.
they went out because in 1841 first paint tubes were invented, and it was now easier to paint outside, than before when you had to make all your paints by mixing pigments in your atelier.
This video is awesome! It is like an impressionism master class. Thank you for posting.
Thank you for this wonderful tour !
love this, thanks for posting
I have listerned to so many on explaining different master pieces and the brilliants of the Artists.Perhaps Momtebello is the best. Deep into the soul.
Thank you for shearing.
The director of this film obviously felt that watching the two gentlemen was more important than viewing the paintings.
I agree about "Magpie" .. saw it at the Kimbell this year .. one cannot understand until one sees it in person It was magical!
Philippe de Montebello seems to know so much about the history of the paintings he really has to restrain himself not to try to tell everything at once and turn it into an overly exited ramble showering informational details but to keep the sentences in a logical succession :D
The first 20 minutes is Rose just not getting it.
We feel very strongly about the proper context of works of art, we have a responsibility to the truth. We feel very strongly that works of art is the greatest manifestation of the creative Mankind, at its highest level of its perception and vision. It should have a context that is serious, that is accurate and scholarly. Director of the Museum of Metropolitan Art, Philippe de Montebello "Origins of Impressionism." (1994) I tend to agree!
@mona2242
4 жыл бұрын
Alyssam Yawe absolutely !
Thanks.
"It's like listening to music, sometimes I want to hear Bach other times I prefer the Wu-Tang Clan. It's all about my mood"
@alya173
4 жыл бұрын
bach or chopin not Wu tang
Wish the camera lingered on the art and not the sales people.
Philippe in his prime--and some of Charlie Rose's best work.
they’re in love
Dans les années jusqu’à les 1950’’s , Mes grande-parents vivaient en Honfleur, Le Havre, et Pont-Audemer, les meme villages que Monet, et, peut-être, ayant assistés Claude Monet et ses amis dans une façon ou d’autre …. Aujourd’hui mes cousins Français habitent en Rouen et à Caen…. Enfin, ma grande-mere Française a une plus fort accent Française que de Msr. Montebello
Bouguereau is the BEST. PERIOD.
Impressionism is like "Fools rush in where angels fear to tread."
I wonder who owns the 1870 still life Paul Cezanne was surely slightly obsessed by Jan Davidsz de Heem with the lemon and centered pole and was along with say William Turner as such quite likely "silky, velvety mint creme cloth"-original cause for departure from tedious realism into art as typically defined by people today he likely painted the individual items separately causing abstract perception through conflicting realism lol
This Director doesn’t know or has Forgotten the Why’s of Impressionism
The push for change, due to boredom? Or a grab on power?
I love the subject but please let the camera focus on the pIntings - not on the two men talking. Its much better to take a long look at the paintings while they talk ... 🙏
ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ Both of these guys are soooo full of themselves.
@shaunyip2153
3 жыл бұрын
The pompous journalist definitely is full of himself, but the museum director is not.
Phil is wasting his time explaining a masterpiece to a mind like Rose's. Still I love hearing Phil.
@mona2242
4 жыл бұрын
Natalia Piacente Phil is really educating us, the public. It’s thanks to C.Rose that we are privy to this lecture.
@wastrel09
4 жыл бұрын
Natalia: that's a snobby attitude
Look Charlie Rose with his cloths on ....
very elitist views towards copyright... apart from that loved the talk.
Charlie Rose, no thanks.
>>>>>>> TOO MANY NOTES !