18:05 lecture start

@dileepkumar-td6xv

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks man

@AlkanandaMohapatra

2 жыл бұрын

Hehehe I was wondering when it will actually start. Thanks 🙏

@thakara

2 жыл бұрын

God's work

@saipraval9301

2 жыл бұрын

Dude you saved me.

@bablishukla8310

Жыл бұрын

Undoubtedly Most relevent comment ......

Never in my life, I have heard a lecture of history with such enthusiasm. Credit goes to you Professor.

Who is watching from india........?

@sanjayvaze7729

2 жыл бұрын

Me , Regularly

@beto6323

2 жыл бұрын

Me haha

@8q_en15

Жыл бұрын

Aspirant?

@gsdarpan5418

Жыл бұрын

Me too

@VIKASKUMAR-ci5bq

Жыл бұрын

Y

After watching this, I am thinking what rubbish I was studying till now. How interesting a subject can be has no limits. I want to study now. Study deeply about history, and other fields too from great teachers like you. Thank you very much Sir for providing me a better perspective to look forward to studies.

I'm so happy to find this channel!! Actually, English isn't my first language, but everything is explained so well, that even I understood nearly all of the lecture!! Thanks, I'll definitely continue watching your videos

I graduated college six years ago, and you make me miss learning, Dr Lal!

आपका धन्यवाद करने के लिए शब्द नहीं है बहुत खूब विनय लाल जी ब

I discover your channel today! Great stuff!!

What a fantabulous lecture he is!

Great information ❤️ Great lecture 🔥❤️🙏👍🏼

marking my attendance because why not, i liked the lecture!

great lecture! so engaging

Hello from four years later! You are amazing!

30:01 Absolutely true that before hindu term coined as a religious name, they were called themselves as sanatanies,vishnavies,.....

Wow, great lecture.

Thanks for sharing 🙏 how interesting

Excellent

Good professor

In the starting point East India Company known as Jhon company......

I would like to know what existed in India in the 200 years before British India , Professor. Only then can I understand the History of British India.

@user-zb3ih3vh4n

2 жыл бұрын

Before British marathas were ruling India and before maratha Aurangzeb the mugal king. Did you know In 1700, the exchequer of the Emperor Aurangzeb reported an annual revenue of more than £100 million, or $450 million, more than ten times that of his contemporary Louis XIV of France, while controlling just 7 times the population Until British Started looting India in the name of civilization.

@8q_en15

Жыл бұрын

A politically fragmented entity that was frequently pillaged by raids from Persia and Afghanistan. Mughal power was disintegrating, Sikhs and Marathas were on the rise and British and French were competing for the market.

What's the group of people he refers to at 34:37? Amadias? Some group of muslims?

Elaborate discussion

Before 10 day i am watching this for graduation exam 😂

He is not even mentioning the marathas. They were one of the prime reasons for the decline of Mongol (aka mogul) oppressors.

@Gaurav-rh3qe

Ай бұрын

Bro this lecture series is about British India

@sidvats21

16 күн бұрын

abe champu british india mein maratha kaise aayega

Professor , it seems you are biased, may be there are reasons for your biases, any way, it was a great introductory lecture, I really liked it, it was not at all boring...I am just interested in understanding why you guys have such views... for that reason I planning to watch whole lecture series...hoping other contents are as interesting as the introductory lecture...I was looking for a complete indian history lecture series from some indian university professors, but could not find one...

@yjain5673

3 жыл бұрын

Might be the fact that you're biased and that's why you think he is

@dimplemaini

3 жыл бұрын

@@yjain5673 Might be the fact that you’re biased that you think he’s biased as he thinks the professors biased 🤌

@yjain5673

3 жыл бұрын

@@dimplemaini might be

#SpeakUpForSSCRailwayStudents

@gauravsinghrajpoot2070

3 жыл бұрын

Yaha bhi aa gye bhai 😂

@lifescatalyst6311

3 жыл бұрын

@@gauravsinghrajpoot2070 Ya

@rohitcoc108

2 жыл бұрын

@@gauravsinghrajpoot2070 oo bhai...🤣🤣🤣

@haveyoumetom813

2 жыл бұрын

WTF

death of Aurangzeb was because of sikh guru. guru gobind singh ji.. 👍

@indiansaresuperioralienrac3615

3 жыл бұрын

Jay govind

@tulsibisen1080

2 жыл бұрын

Zafarnama

@marvin1473

2 жыл бұрын

@Kay Ray then why he's teaching rubbish

I prefer teachers who are not bossy.

He takes a 'slightly different' view all the time. Talks AS IF violence was some kind of European invention, ignoring centuries of bloodshed. Another edgy opinion he gives about afro-americans not being full citizens without even citing an argument.

@SoapIsPeople

3 жыл бұрын

@@manubhatt3 This is quite simply not true, and is indicative of a viewpoint steeped in racial spite. Look up Assyrian and neo-Babylonian conquests and their treatment of the Jews and other subjugated races, hell, even most Mongol campaigns and their treatment of any racial group whom they could not or had no desire to assimilate. Racial violence is as old as race, most conquest-based empires have employed it, and to try and frame it as the "white man's sin" is myopic and gross, and will not age well in the context of a future world history. There is more compassion hidden in exhaustive nuance than there is in casting lazy aspersions without proper evidence. I'm sorry human history can't conform to your racism.

@jimjiminyjaroo300

3 жыл бұрын

There is no doubt African Americans are second class citizens. As a non American, it’s so easy to see that.

@shsh-rf7mi

2 жыл бұрын

@@djoooop I would recommend the book , India Persianate age by Richard m Eaton to understand why the conquest by Afghans and Mughals were more on political grounds than on religion lines. Even destruction of temples were a political act and was done even by local indian rulers as well . So though I agree that it was violent ,thy did not have the British idea of superiority over the local populace

@djoooop

2 жыл бұрын

@@shsh-rf7mi Thanks for your recommendation. Without trying to be dismissive, I do want to say that here you have a (contemporary) western professor who disagrees with the Indian PM for example, who reduced the medieval period to “1200 years of slavery” (from the Indian perspective). So to me it’s a bit weird to say that those older historical works were written by biased westerners and we should now ignore not only them but also the statements of Indians themselves, politically motivated or not. All this in exchange for another western view that seems to practice moral relativism mostly when its suits their narrative. Eventhough the conquest of India wasn’t as destructive to the Indian culture as the conquest of the Americas to their native populations, I’d argue that political and religious motivations were heavily intertwined in both histories.

@rg8071

2 жыл бұрын

I disagree with his argument that African Americans are not as socio-economically advanced as white Americans, or in his words not full citizens, because of oppression. It's a non sequitur. After he makes that claim, he then turns around and says basically that Barack Obama's election to the presidency isn't evidence that he's wrong. Question: has any other country in the world with a white majority of citizens ever elected a mulatto president?

Too woke

@goodluck5642

2 жыл бұрын

You’re watching a lecture about colonization...

@philhudson3619

2 жыл бұрын

@@goodluck5642 your mom

@8q_en15

Жыл бұрын

Don't get triggered by everything that doesn't confirm your opinions.

@philhudson3619

Жыл бұрын

@@8q_en15 what a poor critique. That's basically just saying "you're wrong" in a roundabout manner. Adding no new insight or adding anything. Boring and forgettable. It's not even a clever slogan. This is Facebook boomer level retort. Step it up. Even if I thought in slogans, this wouldn't land.

@silence6605

Жыл бұрын

@@philhudson3619Most people are not going to write whole essays in a KZread comment section.