my left ear must be in another dimension

@nikhilsomvanshi9960

3 жыл бұрын

I stg thought my left headphone is done

@lightweight2467

3 жыл бұрын

so annoying

@paulskillman7595

3 жыл бұрын

The volume is not very high. Can not hear him very well.

@forrisvourvopoulos3252

3 жыл бұрын

Same here 🤪🤣

@MarissaMarie1776

2 жыл бұрын

Lmao

Dr Greene loves what he does so much. One can't help to feel the excitement. He is such a great teacher. If I had teacher(s) like him? I may have. ??????? I can certainly appreciate Professor Greene today. TY Dr Greene.

@bicstic8

Жыл бұрын

He is a joy to listen to

@vinnyvdalidemonet8527

Жыл бұрын

@@bicstic8 👍 He really makes his lesson(s) enjoyable to listen to.

This is one of the most well done lectures for a general audience I've seen in a long time. The audience in Portland seems uncommonly up on their physics.

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

But not much up to thinking. ---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'--- Brian Greene Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God. Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html

The man is amazing no notes everything is extemporaneous

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

Because he likes to make things up as he goes along and then people are wowed by this simpleton. ---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'--- Brian Greene Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God. Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html

My right ear loved this

@josee4283

4 жыл бұрын

@@Itsanameforachannel he said dose

@sekoivu

4 жыл бұрын

One dose for each, though now my left one was left as underdosed

@nikherder9565

4 жыл бұрын

i thought my headphones were fucked

@jameszeallor2735

4 жыл бұрын

@@Itsanameforachannel that's our robot ear.

@jameszeallor2735

4 жыл бұрын

@@elessarstrider5210 more of a prime directive that doesn't discriminate on the consciousness level of the individual.Agreed that this is dangerous for children and impaired and should have a mute button.

Now my right ear knows much much more about universe than my left one

@qaching

4 жыл бұрын

Pratik Raut doesnt matter on a iPhone

@samanthamorgan8117

3 жыл бұрын

Omg I was listening to this in my car and I’m pretty naked, I kept trying to pop my ears lol

@fernandomonarlora7586

3 жыл бұрын

Well, in a parallel universe your left ear knows much more about that universe... Some day Apple will hire some quantum physicists to entangle AirPods across universes and achieve multiversal stereo sound

@samanthamorgan8117

3 жыл бұрын

I meant baked. Not naked. I wasn’t naked in my car lol

@gitanjali705

3 жыл бұрын

@@samanthamorgan8117 LoL I was thinking about it. Why did you use Naked word something like that 😂

Brian Greene is one of the best public speakers i have seen. He's so enthusiastic about his subject, he never stumbles with his words and he's very engaging.

@lepidoptera9337

2 жыл бұрын

And because he is so great he also didn't teach you one real thing about physics. That would have taken a more precise, more pedantic, less personable teacher and it would have required that you actually care to lean something rather than just being entertained. :-)

@kenadams5504

Жыл бұрын

@@lepidoptera9337 Fair point ,but, some people (like me) are started off by Brian's engaging personality and , then realise/focus on, how interesting the subject matter is.

@lepidoptera9337

Жыл бұрын

@@kenadams5504 Which has brought you to the physics library where you have systematically read theory books on classical mechanics, electromagnetism, special relativity, general relativity, quantum mechanics and quantum field theory and in parallel phenomenology books on atomic and molecular physics, nuclear physics, solid state physics, magnetism, optics, astronomy, cosmology and high energy physics. Sure kid. Have a cookie. ;-)

@kenadams5504

Жыл бұрын

@@lepidoptera9337 if you don't like Brian .....why did you click on his video ?

@lepidoptera9337

Жыл бұрын

@@kenadams5504 Because a lot of intellectually lazy kids are here who need to be dressed down a bit. ;-)

These kids are amazing! Their understanding, courage to ask questions to such a great man of science. Defenitely great future for US!

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

He's NO great man of science since he ignores what it points to. ---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'--- Brian Greene Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God. Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html

@leo-unddieAnderen

Жыл бұрын

What makes a " man " great?

"Have you ever used a video camera?" "No." "Great. You're hired."

@peterswanson3446

2 жыл бұрын

Right! 😂

I loved the interaction with the kid towards the end :)

I have seen a lot of his lectures through the years but....this may be the best. In the end, when he fields what seem like nonsensical questions with such vigor...just perfect. He anticipates the questions because they are trying to understand what he is putting forth in traditional intuitive mechanics. There is little intuitive about going past the dimensions we observe.

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

He's not trying to understand, he's putting on a show that suckers buy into, is all. ---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'--- Brian Greene Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God. Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html

Oh man, this is insanely trippy when stoned

@alpcelebi4759

3 жыл бұрын

Ofc very deep all the time :D

Thanks for this wonderful presentation.... It's always great to listen Dr . Brian Greene... Thanks once again for bringing in public...

@gunsandkithes6900

4 жыл бұрын

u a scientist????

Excellent, excellent, excellent. A most enjoyable talk.

It feels like my ear is perforated listening to this video because the audio is only in one channel. Thanks anyway.

I woke up this morning with the "quantum jitters" but a shot of Jack Daniels soon put me right.

This man is such a great educator he explains such complex ideas so well.....one of the greats...thank you for posting this.

@vMaxHeadroom

4 жыл бұрын

@@BradWatsonMiami Oh boy....there are places you can go for help....it's called school...

@BradWatsonMiami

4 жыл бұрын

@@vMaxHeadroom: I attended 7 colleges (4 locally) and taught at an 8th. How about you? Help me with 'The Conglomerate - Universe Creation Theory'. What did I get wrong? See GOD=7_4 Theory at GOD704.fandom.com . Atheists hate that - they never imagined that someone could come up with a very simple scientific, mathematical, historic, linguistic, comparative religion, musicial...proof of GOD & God-incarnate.

What a great story teller. He could be an award winning science fiction writer along with Michio Kaku.

@whirledpeas3477

10 ай бұрын

Being slow in the brain must suck, be well

The QA was super interesting around 1:17:00 - 1:23:00

B Green is really a national treasure. I love how he allows the rest of us to partake in his joy. Thank you.

@leo-unddieAnderen

Жыл бұрын

I thank GOD for allowing us to undrstand such concepts. Thanking a " scientist" is nice but really somewhat odd in my humble view.

@AyeCriz

10 ай бұрын

@@leo-unddieAnderenwhat god tho?

What a remarkable young man. He brings great joy to my life.

some day some where.. some one will get the damn audio rite on these things.... WOW... i dont understand how they dont get it...

@scottreday9377

4 жыл бұрын

It seems like the more important the topic you want to hear, from the person you want to hear from, the more the clipped the audio becomes. I brought this up once before, and only one other guy got it. I can't take that! I shut it right off. DeGrasse Tyson is one whose audio is always clipped. Maybe they take him more seriously?

@rocky7895

3 жыл бұрын

Dont worry... They got it right in another universe 😆

@XPFTP

3 жыл бұрын

@@rocky7895 lol

its fine to crank the volume all the way to 100....until one of the KZread commercial plays in the middle of the video (EAR DRUMS ARE THEN BLOWN!).

@kissoffire1

4 жыл бұрын

I just upgraded to Premium - oh my word, what an incredible pleasure! I leave KZread on all night to help sleep. Between the commercials blasting me awake and my previous hopeless WiFi provider, it was a gnashing of teeth affair 😎😎

Ironically I was listening to this with only my right ear bud cuz I was working and then put the left one in and thought my earbuds were broken 😂

@philipcoleman8184

3 жыл бұрын

He believes in fairy tales!

For a moment I was set back that my phone malfunctioned as my earphones were new and I thought I would had to get a new phone😂😂😂

Thank you so much, Mr. Greene

Man I sure hope that my parallel self in another universe didn’t marry my first wife!

@thestrongest3050

4 жыл бұрын

Woah just sad

@michaelnelson3752

3 жыл бұрын

every possible situation exists............but while conscious in another self someday in another universe (maybe after we die in this life) you will be unaware of any of this existence and what happened here...................(unless someday we can entangle information beyond an existing universe to carry previous universe history into the next but that is nothing but mind blowing speculation at this point).............so just hope you if you become conscious in the next universe its one where you never even meet her..........LOL

Audio on right channel only. :-( Good lecture.

@earthfarmer

4 жыл бұрын

So I can stop testing my earbuds and changing settings since you verified no left audio, thank you

Here's a very strange notion. Is there a useful experiment that would need the cooperation of someone in another universe also doing a similar experiment? If so, could we proceed with that experiment and assume our counterparts in that universe have already thought the same thing, thereby eventually proving each other exist?

@leo-unddieAnderen

Жыл бұрын

interesting.

I see Dr. Brian Greene, I click. Simple as that

@whirledpeas3477

10 ай бұрын

Sounds like a full-time job

@SheSweetLikSugarNSavage

6 ай бұрын

You might need to get that looked at.... 😳

Extraordinary.. thank you doctor

Can't even imagine the intelligence gap between myself and these couple kids that questioned , when on my age, growing with a model of the world so much wider and so different than I did 40 years ago.

Awesome presentation!

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

Not at all; Greene is a joke. ---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'--- Brian Greene Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God. Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html

Brian Green is fantastic thankyou for this .

Excellent. Only wish had a better sound quality 😊😊

As usual amazing talk from Dr Greene. As awesome as the theory of inflationary cosmology is, many prominent physicist does not agree with that theory including one of the greatest mind of the 20th century and 2020 Physics Nobel Laureate Sir Roger Penrose. He famously said when he first saw the proposal, he felt ill. LOL

Can hardly hear it and volume is all the way up. Too bad.

@Armored11

4 жыл бұрын

Lol good to know others have the same problem. I thought I was losing my hearing.

@michaelstone7546

3 жыл бұрын

Ok on Amazon Kindle HD 10. Check your volume controls

Brought to us in glorious low one channel audio! I had to stop watching it, wasn't going to pay that amount attention to what I could barely hear.

@alexanderabrashev1366

2 жыл бұрын

Ok bye

I believe your extra universe is more likely the regions indicated by your previous string theory discussions of extra dimensions but those small bits of extra dimensions are connected in some way. Also, the idea of length & size is distorted. This would explain quantum entanglement & how light is both a wave & a particle. Trying to explain these things & dark matter require extra-dimensional interaction to be included.

Awesome lecture

Muchas gracias por tan lindo contenido.

I can easily believe everything he said has to be true and here's why I believe this has to be COMPLETELY accurate ( even though I cant possibly explain it correctly but FEEL it ) .. i lost my deeply loved dog recently to bone cancer the grief was so painful and deep i would cry myself to sleep until one night I had this incredible dream that was so vivid so realistic and so detailed that I woke up totally confused as to where I was and what had just happened in my DREAM or what felt like MORE and closer to an actual PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE that was with me and me boy Junior who had been with me in this place that I recognized as HOME as the same location I live in but it was TOTALLY DIFFERENT . It was my town just arranged completely different yet I was still home walking my sweet dog just him and I and we walked thru a park we used to go to but it was DIFFERENT and then saw a dog just like him accross the street and he got excited to see this other dog and they ran out to each other and I was terrified they would fight but they didn't because turns out it was one if his 11 littermates, a sister and they immediatly began to rejoice at the REUNION and the other dog my digs sister was with a man who just stood and im not sure but I think I the man was my brother who died and had come to take my dog back with him to this OTHER PLACE WITH THEM and I remember watching my boy leave with the other dog and the man I felt was my brother and I just had to cry with both happiness at the sight of my dog young healthy happy and playing running happy to be with his sister again and as they left with that man who brought the other dog to get my boy and take him back. I cried both with joy and also regret knowing I would NEVER see my dog again until i die and that was months ago when up to that moment i had had many dreams of my dog weird nonsensical broken little dreams that didn't make sense after he died up until I had this one unique EXPERIENCE and since that one I have never had even one tiny shred of a dream about him or my brother not ONE so its for this reason that I cant help but think was much more than a dream because it felt like something else something you just don't understand yet cant deny was way way more and leaves you KNOWING what you cant possibly know unless you experience it that it was so intense so realistic so COMFORTING and so detailed in ways no dream could ever have accomplished i believe 100% that there is a parralel world very much like this one but we can't see until we die when we die our energy does not end it goes somewhere and there must be a dimension another univers one like our universe but different one where we go after we die and call me crazy call it wishful thinking or grieving or delusion I DONT CARE I know that what I experienced in my sleep state HAPPENED ill never forget it that I was able to get a glimpse of another reality and my dog and my brother and all those no longer here will be found there i hope And maybe we will find out how to go there by will and that science is getting closer and closer to understanding the truth about it all including the possibility we may CROSS OVER when we die in this reality only to be able to live in the next one.

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

So your dreams led you to truth? Not for me, I go by sufficient evidence. ---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'--- Brian Greene Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God. Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html

Need some volume please.

"Theories which are difficult to disprove" Physics SAD state today. PERFECT for the Greenes of "science"

At about 8:20 into the lecture, professor Greene says that the light from the distant object would take about 14 billion light years to reach us, as the universe was created about fourteen billion years ago. Doesn't this assume that the objects are receding at the speed of light? Wherefrom do we assume this notion? Must I be missing some vital piece? Please illuminate.

@avr8844

Жыл бұрын

Because light travels at one light year every year. So in the age of the universe, 14 billion years give or take, light that shone from 15 billion lighr years away won't get here for another billion years. Light that started out 14 billion light years away has been traveling for 14 billion years and is now just reaching us.

Why is the video so fuzzy and only one channel of sound.

If particals do replicate eventually in space then it should also on earth right Could this explain the look a likes? Of so many people that have been found? If so could this consequently help the argument it beeing treu in total?

While I think he handled the questions from the kids really well, I think he really gave one question short shrift. If there is an infinite number of universes, and if each of those universes can have different dimensions that give rise to different constants, and if this applies to c or something like it, then there are in fact an infinite number of universes with the potential to 'catch up' to ours, in which case there is also an infinite number of 'detonator' universes, meaning it's a statistical certainty that our universe could have been or would be destroyed or at least give rise to paradoxes like she also mentioned. Since this hasn't happened, there's a flaw in at least one of the premises.

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

Since Greene is some nitwit that pretends to think, why do people take him seriously as if he really is out searching for answers? ---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'--- Brian Greene Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God. Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html

@leo-unddieAnderen

Жыл бұрын

huh?

@dustinfrost2603

Жыл бұрын

@@leo-unddieAnderen Premise A: Infinite universes exist Premise B: Our universe exists within this infinite set Premise C: Universes may have different laws that govern their existence Premise D: A possible universe would have a law that would allow it to destroy our universe Conclusion: our universe is destroyed The conclusion is demonstrably false, so there must be at least one incorrect premise

The end is frequency, vibrations in various ways creates frequency, the one thing in common to every universe, dimensions, ever known object. So frequency was the beginning. Everything can be done in frequency.

I have no sound , what to do? Help please

Excellent thanks. Very truth.

why is the string as small as the planck lenght?

I love this talk but am stuck on the initial premise- that there are a finite number of particles- and thus that predicts that there must be multiverses. How in the world could such a premise be made when we know the one sure thing about our Universe is that it is expanding? This is like saying that we will always replicate ourselves eventually because there are a finite number of people. There are not. Going to keep watching- but this is sort of blowing the rest of the talk for me!

@lepidoptera9337

2 жыл бұрын

Depends on what you mean by particles? The quantum fields we have observed below 1TeV? Yes, that's a finite number, but they would not be the same in a different universe in these models. The structure of the physical vacuum would be different. The problem with these models is that they are unobservable. I would not pay them too much attention. They are basically just string theory looking for an application.

What if there is something at the end of the universe that is pulling galaxies toward it?

Good thing my right headphone is the one that's still working

I have indeed seen the other dimensions in a very odd way. I had a piece of paper slip into a different dimension and disappear from ours right in front of me, never ever to be seen again, despite my efforts to locate having not believed my own eyes.

@spy2778

4 жыл бұрын

Sasha Brown money...

@bbouchan1

4 жыл бұрын

The borrowers!

@watchingwatches2785

4 жыл бұрын

Sasha Brown u got anymore of whatever the fuck your smoking

@carlalakins

4 жыл бұрын

Sasha Brown Elaborate please??

@johnkillmaster5411

4 жыл бұрын

clipping my hair above the sink, later looked for the hair to clean up, there was not one hair- it went into another realm/universe. absolute truth. just like Sasha.

Excellent questions from an 8th grader!

11:00 just like what The OA says #savetheOA

If dark energy number is 0.0000.........1385 or0.000000...139 will that kind of universe exist? If yes then between 138 to 139 infinite number are there Or the energy can change in plank measure?

Inflation theory needs primordial gravity waves, which would be implied by a B-mode polarization of the CMB. I don't know that it's been seen yet.

gravity and acceleration are indistinguishable - now we know they are the same. Having law of physics X and everybody believing in X are indistinguishable too

Who operating the camera ? His three year old daughter ?

@bankafouf

7 ай бұрын

This person is a diceptive he have on daughter ? He now nothing in phisiques nor anything else why he is there speaking ?

Another great question from a kid!

Stringing theory breaks down in my left ear

Somebody please give Brian the switch for the lights

Camera guy drunk. 🤣

The kid at the end was great haha around 1:17:00

@gillescoutlee2379

2 жыл бұрын

Might be a future Brian Greene!;-)

Well, now, don't you tell me to smile You stick around I'll make it worth your while Like numbers beyond what you can dial Maybe it's because we're so versatile

Why post videos with defective audio? Surely the original must have been better; in any case, this is ruined by the missing left channel. At very least it could have been mixed down to mono before posting. That would have made it listenable.

Could you find the edge of space is like there are thoughts you are not thinking at this moment

There was no big bang of creation. The second quantum correction in the Friedmann equation gets rid of the big-bang singularity. In otherwords, what's here has always been here.

@espaciohexadimencionalsern3668

4 жыл бұрын

Systems need of big bangs, small ones and all diferent sizes to me but only to get energy out of them.

@carlalakins

4 жыл бұрын

Lyles Fredidog Everything that “exists” has a beginning of the “existence”. No one can say *how* this existence started: we are just scratching the surface of our knowledge of the universe.

The universe is not made out of particle, it is made out of quantised fields. It may be that there are an infinite x infinite ways that these fields can be arranged which then means even if the universe is infinite you never get a the same state repeated. Being quantised is different than being a particle as there is some sense that a state is spatially distributed.

@michaelstone7546

3 жыл бұрын

True for a 2D world of graphs. For 3D, it would be infinity x infinity x infinity, aleph 3 infinity.

Much, much more.

So, Strings are Planck Length?

@stephaniesadie832

Жыл бұрын

well they cant be any bigger, or it would distort spacetime and cause mini black holes.

Minus 90 straight line.

He’s my hero

An attempted straight track through the universe, “never turning the steering wheel,” there’s no telling where you’d end up. It’s called gravitational drift: GD.

This was the moment Brian realized he forgot he ate 3 dried grams 3 hrs before the show 😆

⌚ it plus n minus events... let's 👀

we can created universes , because , we are the universes

HTF did the other scientists not see what hubble seen especially Einstein 🤔☘️

When space ends whats on the outside that stop's it? The spark that started the supposed big bang.. needed space to start with... some space for it to bang.. where did that space come from?

@josee4283

4 жыл бұрын

the bang created the "space"

@michaelstone7546

3 жыл бұрын

There are many possibilities: a previous universe, our Kline bottle universe, another brane split, a null point, accumulated strings, etc. It's an open question.

hi , Dr Green

Shame the sound is coming only out of the right channel. :( {:-:-:}

Reverse engineer what shape would be required to produce the vibration that the sound om makes. And that's the shape of the extra dimension. Your welcome human

@avr8844

Жыл бұрын

Don't TELL THEM??!?!!!

thanks to sofia

It's possible that there`s a much possibilities - astrophysics today.

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

Greene is a joke but still people take that nitwit seriously. ---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'--- Brian Greene Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God. Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html

great discovery brian....oh ya...that was something you read

Can we access some information from other universe If ans is no then how u sure that it exist In maths there is infinite number Is that mean every number have some physical significance hell No Then how we trust that anything is possible Tell me one thing professor in ur theory what is impossible other than backward Time travel

Good guy. Brit. Mostly women don't have water above 20.

long 🌙 's applying energy

24:00 haha... “69”

This guy isn't dumb. Just a thought

@bankafouf

7 ай бұрын

This dud is a diceptive ? That's the write word ... fraud if you like and more other words

@SheSweetLikSugarNSavage

6 ай бұрын

You're right he's not dumb. He's a deranged little mongkey. Please delete any of this cosmic contagion from your cortex.

Channel 69 to watch the Big Bang. Makes sense.

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

The big bang only makes sense to those that don't have much sense. ---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'--- Brian Greene Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God. Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html

I always understood these things with no fancy education.

How to measure it, even the math suggests it. It will be a philosophical issue? As far as I know, math has to be supported by observation etc like old science school. So how will et ever be proven

@espaciohexadimencionalsern3668

4 жыл бұрын

whats up boddy did you like my work?

@espaciohexadimencionalsern3668

4 жыл бұрын

i never heard of you again man¡ what do you say about my work?

Maybe you should not call them extra dimensions.they are still 3 spatial coordinates No matter the size or shape

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

Good for you! Don't let Greene rob your thinking. ---I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'--- Brian Greene Natural laws are about nature. Those laws prove 100% that creation and life can't happen naturally. We only have one choice left, they happened supernaturally. Brian though still thinks naturally won. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God. Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html

Matter is never acomodated in parallel in the cosmos but it is fixed HEXAGONAL form cause is the easiests form to fill space so bees know it to save more wax, keep more honey and work less.

Greene is such a brilliant speaker that I wish there could be more of persons like him in universities.... Possibly the multiverse picture is right ;)

If I know ONE thing: Nothing, absolutely Nothing! - Is For Ever😁