Henry III - England's Most Pious King Documentary
Download Hunting Clash for FREE here huntingclash.link/ThePeoplePr... and use my code HUNTWITHPEOPLE to get $15 worth of gifts for new players only!
For early access to our videos, discounted merch and many other exclusive perks please support us as a Patron or Member...
Patreon: / thepeopleprofiles
Buy me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/peoplepr...
KZread Membership: / @peopleprofiles
or follow us on Twitter! / tpprofiles
The script for this video has been checked with Plagiarism software and scored 1% on Grammarly. In academia, a score of below 15% is considered good or acceptable.
All footage, images and music used in People Profiles Documentaries are sourced from free media websites or are purchased with commercial rights from online media archives.
#Biography #History #Documentary
Пікірлер: 142
Download Hunting Clash for FREE here huntingclash.link/ThePeopleProfiles and use my code HUNTWITHPEOPLE to get $15 worth of gifts for new players only!
@dieterf.heinlin6499
2 жыл бұрын
please German Untertitel
Every time I see a new video from this channel, I smile uncontrollably.
@chenlou7366
2 жыл бұрын
Man I love history .
@operaben
2 жыл бұрын
The man known to hist'ry as...
@alleynealisleem9777
2 жыл бұрын
Me Too! History Rocks!💖💕🤗🥰🤣
@iflopgardens
Жыл бұрын
Bot
@topcthepainclan2004
Жыл бұрын
@@iflopgardens I have to poop
There is no doubt that Henry III deserves a better place in the long history of English kings. The documentary has offered a very interesting introduction to the subject. Thanks.
@JangianTV
8 ай бұрын
He's now had a two volume biography published by master historian David Carpenter. 🙂
@kashfiaislam9995
4 ай бұрын
I hope King Henry III is burning in hell with Charlemagne, King John I, King Edward I, Margaret Beaufort, King Henry VII, King Henry VIII, Marie de Medici, King Louis XIV, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn, Queen Victoria, King Edward VII, King George V, King Edward VIII, King George VI, and Prince Philip. 👗👠👑💍🇬🇧
Wow Henry III had a rough time.
Thank you. William Marshall was a great man, I read a book about it and enjoyed it very much. Though, now - in the way we think now - not so good for Wales, we can’t put the customs of about 700 years ago to today’s standards. Whatever, he was a great man and had a great influence on the man Henry became. 👵👵👵🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
@chrislaw4189
2 жыл бұрын
Was this the Thomas Ashbridge book?
@deturvilleashley3330
Жыл бұрын
I’m a direct descendant of William Marshal. Yes, I agree he was a great man
Henry III sounds like a decent bloke - careful, thoughtful and pious, and capable of fostering peaceful solutions between states
@chisto6837
Жыл бұрын
Unlike hia Father King John.
@ToyyinnAuslander
Жыл бұрын
I have a somewhat different selection of adjectives: timid, naive, unimaginative. And while we can all agree that he was pious, there is not as much to suggest he was thoughtful.
@tebo9334
Жыл бұрын
He was a shy, cowardly, lazy, moron who caused a ton of conflict and was terrible at ending it.
@Shineon83
Жыл бұрын
….Would have made a far better Archbishop of Canterbury than an Angevin King….
@HowlingWo1f
5 ай бұрын
Yeah, as long as you weren’t Jewish. He’s one of the biggest enemies of our nation Yemach Shemo
Love Henry III, great King, great Catholic and also my 26th Great Grandfather on the Paternal line
@kashfiaislam9995
4 ай бұрын
I hope King Henry III is burning in hell with Charlemagne, King John I, King Edward I, Margaret Beaufort, King Henry VII, King Henry VIII, Marie de Medici, King Louis XIV, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn, Queen Victoria, King Edward VII, King George V, King Edward VIII, King George VI, and Prince Philip. 👗👠👑💍🇬🇧
🙌 Love these videos, so SOoo much!
I think Marshall is the most important night and Englishmen other than the Kings and regency of all time he is such a legend and the greatest night of all-time in my eyes
King Henry III is one of my great grandfathers on a paternal line
@EriBarr
11 ай бұрын
And mine through my paternal line 😊
@honestpledges8435
10 ай бұрын
@@EriBarr I meant paternal oops
@EriBarr
10 ай бұрын
Hey cousin! Lol
@snellproductions1209
4 ай бұрын
Yeah im related to him too through my grandfathers mother on the paternal too.
@boogiesmell5181
4 ай бұрын
Are you all quite sure about that? I mean how can you be sure, really? I guess you paid some online heritage service to get these results? It would be in their interest to link you to royalty. It might be unethical and doesn't have to be truthful in the least, but it is effective marketing. Every comment section for youtube videos about royalty is full of comments such as these. These scams are nothing new.
these docos are great, thanks heaps.
Thank u so much for all your hard work & making this videos they always make me happy. Thanks again & gods bless every1.
This channel has the best documentaries
A sovereign worth canonizing.
Looking forward to this one!
I reenactment King John at Rochester Castle loved your video well done
It's fascinating to see how many people in the comments claim ancestry from the aristocracy/royalty. I, myself am descended from a long line of the peasantry
@boogiesmell5181
4 ай бұрын
It's almost as if the paid for online heritage services have some incentive in linking people to royalty in order to get this kind of free advertising...
Is it just me or is John the only Plantagenet king left to cover on this amazing channel?
@theblackprince1346
2 жыл бұрын
Yes John still needs a video also so does Henry IV who usurped his cousin Richard II for the throne and is the father of Henry V of Agincourt fame.
@catsberry4858
2 жыл бұрын
I can’t remember. Good call. Have they done all the Yorks and Lancasters or only the ones not considered to be part of the “sub group”? I can’t remember. I watch too many biographies lol
@catsberry4858
2 жыл бұрын
@@theblackprince1346 formerly Henry Bolingbroke, right? I feel like they did his, but probably not. I’d love to see that one, too. I think I’m confusing it with one they did where the intro talks about Bolingbroke but the bio is on his relative. Love your username :)
@theblackprince1346
2 жыл бұрын
@@catsberry4858 correct Henry IV was called that before taking the throne. Also was the Duke of Lancaster after his father John of Gaunt. Thanks :)
@catsberry4858
2 жыл бұрын
@@theblackprince1346 it makes me sad that all those brothers and nephews would have to fight and scheme and even kill each other over so much. I’m watching “The Golden Horde” series now from 2018 and it confirms my concerns. I only have watched a few biographies about it, but I don’t have a whole lotta sympathy for Henry IV. He is the one who agreed to just let Richard II die of starvation in his prison, yes? Richard II was no good, and I get that he essentially was left with no choice, but it just will not sit right with me that Henry 4 allowed him to starve a very very grueling slow painful death. IIRC, there were no physical signs on his body of being attacked or anything, so the conclusion is that he died of starvation. It’s just very uneasy for me to think about. It’s not a way I would want to make anyone go out. :(
Enjoyed this
Another masterpiece 👌👌
@jayterry8551
2 жыл бұрын
More pious than edward the confesser.
How could I have overlooked this Chad? I'm sorry, Henry III!
I love the background music
@Simple-2-
Жыл бұрын
But there isn’t any lol
I find England's history fascinating. Because it's my country's history too. They ruled my country 1st before the revolution. Says it in its name where I live New England. I have English blood and everything. But only half.
@MontyDotharl
2 жыл бұрын
I'd say they were at best the second to rule that land. Since, y'know, there were people there already...
@chelseagruenwald
2 жыл бұрын
this is lame af
@co94
2 жыл бұрын
@@MontyDotharl he said, “rule his country,” not, “that land,” as you wrote.
@MontyDotharl
2 жыл бұрын
@@co94 Okay, if you wanna get that fucking granular and pedantic, let's split some hairs. England NEVER ruled the country of the United States of America because the country of the United States of America was founded more than a year after the colonies actually broke away from Britain and the American Revolutionary War started. So what other excuse would you like to offer up to sweep the fact that this land, THIS COUNTRY, was violently stolen from Native Americans under the rug?
My mind is ready.
The gold penny you mention @35:40 was worth 20 pence. 😂
More pious than Alfred the Great, Edward the Confessor and Henry VI?
I agree with you that she’s unlikely to be a Dior muse. I would even say unworthy for the simple reason that she’s not a mega star (or a great beauty) like all the muses before her. Having said that, there is a series of videos on Dior’s KZread channel called “what’s in the bag” and that could realistically feature her in a single episode. They have featured so many people mainly models & actors. Slipping meghan into an episode is something her pr company could pull off. But an official permanent muse? No way
Who is the narrator he makes the video even better with his English accent
Another interesting ancestor of my mother’s side of the family
Poor guy. If only he had a Cecil or Walsingham, competent and loyal ppl, where he'd be able to more himself. If only the wifey wasn't so scheming. I think he was good man. Sensitive n pious. Fine traits perhaps not for a king inv those times..
….Ahhhh…Simon DeMontfort : A MAN’S MAN ❤
@boogiesmell5181
4 ай бұрын
He was a self-serving, nasty anti-semite of the worst kind. Betrayed his king who trusted him. Not even his fellow barons found him trustworthy. He pretty much deserved what was coming to him.
HENRY 3 BUILT THE ABBEY
@beth7935
Жыл бұрын
ED 1 HATED SCOTS
@revinhatol
Жыл бұрын
@@beth7935 A RED HOT POKER KILLED ED 2
@beth7935
Жыл бұрын
@@revinhatol 😂THAT MUST HAVE HURT HIM LOTS
@domispablo7992
Жыл бұрын
@@beth7935 EDWARD THIRD WAS A CHIVALRY NERD BEHUN THE HUNDERED YEARS WAR
@beth7935
Жыл бұрын
@@domispablo7992 THEN RICHARD 2 WAS KING AGED 10; THEN HENRY- YES, ONE MORE!
being the weakest link in the Plantagenet link until Edward ii doesn't do one favours for rememberability
@boogiesmell5181
4 ай бұрын
Opinions are subjective, but John and Richard I were infinitely worse rulers than Henry III in my opinion. I'm also at a loss to figure out what good William II (Rufus) ever did. Henry II was also a devilish character, who was hated by all his sons, the results of these feuds weren't very good... Henry I? Meh. Henry III was IMHO by far the best Plantagenet king, until Edward III possibly. Henry III ruled for 56 years but is remembered for so little. No great failures, no great conquests. The king who balanced the books? Boring, perhaps. But good as a king, and just what England needed at the time.
do a video on aethelstan the first kin gof england
@JoeKerr420
2 жыл бұрын
That would be great! Or Edward the Confessor
Seems like the kid then adult king just had his head screwed on. Why fight when we can marry, talk and use diplomacy. Only fight when necessary.
@Shineon83
Жыл бұрын
EXCEPT….His “diplomacy” was more slap-dash, piecemeal, and, far worse, failed to take into account the long-term implications of his “deals”-eventually, leading to extraordinary bloodshed (as in the Thirty Years War with France)….
I have recently learned Henry III is in my Ancestry as my Grandfather as well as many other English and French royals.
@katellakreative
Жыл бұрын
Same here, what does this mean? haha How many generations back for you?
@anglovikingyt2389
Жыл бұрын
@@katellakreative 26th for me. I still treat em as my family though
@boogiesmell5181
4 ай бұрын
I recently learned I'm related to Jesus. On my mothers side.
The thumbnail looks like Hugh Laurie
he was always a pleaser.
18 March 2022
👍👍👍👍👍👍
Henry the Third was a good king.
@tebo9334
Жыл бұрын
He was terrible.
@Simple-2-
Жыл бұрын
@@tebo9334no I don’t agree
@alexjones50
9 ай бұрын
well it depends what you mean by good, He was a pretty morally good king, at least by the standards of the time. but he wasn't exactly the most competent, though as stated in the video most of the problems he faced weren't his fault.
@boogiesmell5181
4 ай бұрын
Agreed. Incompetent kings don't stay in charge 56 years. I'd go as far as to say he was an exceptionally good king for his age. He was devout, a good father and husband, had no mistresses, always preferred peace and diplomacy to war and aggression, left England in a much better shape than it was when he took over. Most of the issues he faced were not his own doing. He lived in a very turbulent time and his fathers (and grandfathers) chaotic reigns had left England at the brink of collapse. He stabilized things and was exactly the kind of ruler England needed at the time. A remarkable achievement and a remarkably forgotten king.
@kashfiaislam9995
4 ай бұрын
I hope King Henry III is burning in hell with Charlemagne, King John I, King Edward I, Margaret Beaufort, King Henry VII, King Henry VIII, Marie de Medici, King Louis XIV, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn, Queen Victoria, King Edward VII, King George V, King Edward VIII, King George VI, and Prince Philip. 👗👠👑💍🇬🇧
Hugh Lawrie
Primero john haora Henry III?
Im a direct descendent of king henry the 3rd :)
Henry Vlll
I think he is unappreciated.
Wow just found out he is my kin
@Simple-2-
Жыл бұрын
How? In what way?
sunderland a.f.c 👑.
I love how they like to skew the story to make it seem like England had taken over parts of France when in fact it was northern France that was in control on England and the rulers of that kingdom spoke French as their primary language.
@disaffected_malcontent
Жыл бұрын
of course. we are aware of the Norman conquest obviously.
@Patrick-rf3uj
Жыл бұрын
The early Angevins were based. A real shame Edward III went too far, for neither the Britons nor the French wanted war.
@reidparker1848
3 ай бұрын
After the 2nd generation they were no longer Norman. It's pretty much the international consensus that the Normans became "naturales Angli" and proud of their "Anglorum patria" by the end of Henry II's reign, past that, chroniclers and writers of the era seem to have seen "Normannis" as antiquated legally and everybody is simply called "Angli" instead. Even in tournament records from Richard I's reign, the nobles in England are called English.King Edward I, himself a Norman-French speaker, when issuing writs for summoning Parliament in 1295, claimed that the King of France planned to invade England and extinguish Old English, "a truly detestable plan". By about the time of this video, they were making efforts to learn English, though this only became universal with Henry V. "Northern France" didn't control England, the Normans did, and the French Capetians took it from them in the early 1200s.
@reidparker1848
3 ай бұрын
@@disaffected_malcontent What the Francophile has said isn't true, either.
I like him but sandwiched between a father who was a terrible king in almost every way and a son who though an extremely talented warrior was also morally repugnant? I hadn't thought of him much
Kingly nose 👃
Think this is overly-kind to Henry….He really was a screw-up of a Medieval King 🤴
And savoy are still ruling the world
It wasn't simply that Jews were allowed to practice usury when Christians were not, it was that it was practically the only profession Jews were allowed to participate in. It was not entirely a matter of choice.
I disagree. Henry VI was far far more pious. He was pious to the point where he neglected his kingly duties, became clinically insane, and led the nation into a protracted period of civil war. Henry III was at least a functional ruler.
@kashfiaislam9995
4 ай бұрын
I hope King Henry III is burning in hell with Charlemagne, King John I, King Edward I, Margaret Beaufort, King Henry VII, King Henry VIII, Marie de Medici, King Louis XIV, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn, Queen Victoria, King Edward VII, King George V, King Edward VIII, King George VI, and Prince Philip. 👗👠👑💍🇬🇧
lol
yfgigygy❤❤❤❤
A video game to kill animals. Nice.
@Simple-2-
Жыл бұрын
Ikr animal abuse and cruelty 💀
Algorithm comment
Judaism does NOT allow usury in fact
@KoolVideoGames
2 жыл бұрын
Judaism allows for it when it’s not towards another Jewish person, whereas Christians believed that they couldn’t not commit usury to anyone.
@beth7935
Жыл бұрын
Really? Interesting! I've always heard the usual explanation- that Judaism did allow it, unlike Christianity, & that's why Jewish people were moneylenders- but have I missed something? Were they forced to do it by Christian rulers, perhaps?? I can imagine they wouldn't exactly be able to refuse.
Hunting Clash - that is a totally disgusting "game" imo.