कोई फर्क नहीं पड़ता औरत कमाती हो ये तब भी उसके पक्ष मे आर्डर करेंगे crpc 125 मे क्या लिखा है इन्हे कोई मतलब नहीं 101% आर्डर औरत के पक्ष मे ही होगा

@rishigoel71

3 күн бұрын

Who said this

@user-fk7pi1ut5v

2 күн бұрын

Frk padhta hai mentince de mile ga patni ko aghr wo khud kama skti hai to

Shadi sirf purus hi karte hai Aurat to bas Sari dunia chor kar apke ghar 125 or 498 ke lia aati hai

वकील साहब को जानकारी बहुत है और तर्क शक्ति अच्छी है। बहुत इंटेलीजेंट वकील हैं ये

Same judge refused to accept a 420 charge when the wife lied about her qualification by saying that she is 12th pass while in reality she was only 10th pass. 😂😂😂

@akashhanvate7782

Ай бұрын

Section 496 defines the offence of fraud marriage the case was filed under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) i.e deals with cheating and dishonestly inducing someone to part with property. Also accusation towards the curruption of police depatment and also the accusation towards his mother in Law where non of it was filed in the Affidevite.

@vraddhi3556

Ай бұрын

Uss aadmi ne galat section mai charge lagaya tha. Also, usne apni mother in law ke liye prostitute jaisa word use Kiya. Pure police department ko generalise karne ke baad corrupt bola. Then Judge Ahluwalia handled the situation very well and told him aapne bhi marriage se pehle advocate bataya apne aapko aur mera muh mat khulwaiye jab aapke paas 3-4 clients hi hai toh financial position aapki bhi strong nhi hai aur iske liye aapne bhi kya bola hoga. Woh aur uska advocate dono galat the. That is why they stepped back kyuki inhone ek women ka aur pure police department ka character assassinate kiya. That person was uneducated jisko advocate hone ke baad bhi nhi pta kis section mai kaunsa case file hoga. Toh aadhi adhuri information pr smart mat bno

@vraddhi3556

Ай бұрын

Uss case ko pura dekhlo yha logo ko galat information Dene se pehle. Phir 😂 bhej lena. 420 section ki category mai nhi aata woh aur advocate hone ke baad bhi he didn't have basic knowledge that he cannot malign someone's character in court. But he did so saying mother in law is prostitute and entire police department is corrupt. That time Judge Ahluwalia pointed that out and he and his advocate had to step back because they were wrong. Aise toh tum kahi ka case khi le jaoge. Aur iss baare mai bhi bta do that as an advocate himself he merely had 3-4 clients jisko Judge Ahluwalia ne subtle tarah se yeh bhi bola tha ki aapne bhi apni exact financial position nhi batayi hogi toh sab sacchai mat bulwao yha pr. People like you don't understand anything in depth sirf bakwas karni hoti hai.

Excellent efforts by lawyer 🎉🎉

Amazing Lawyer skill.... Never saw such smart lawyer.

According to Indian laws Husband is responsible for providing maintenance of wife as well as her pet dog who provide mental support.😂😂😂

@ravindraprasad5486

2 ай бұрын

Now a day gender equality husband and wife both are earning. This judge have mentallity of 1947.who make him judge in divorse case maintaince is for spouce thats not geneder specific in law. If both are earning then no one can get. If husband is earning less and wife is more wife will give maintainace for Husband. Pata nahee kis desh kaa kannon iss judge nahee padhaa hain

@vraddhi3556

Ай бұрын

Dowry Milne pr nhi rote ho tum log maintenance nhi Diya jata bas.

@ravindraprasad5486

Ай бұрын

@@vraddhi3556 Baap aur Bhai bhee kisi kaa pati hotaa hain

@basantitanga3631

Ай бұрын

@@vraddhi3556 Drowry is illegal in India, both parties giving & taking drowry is a criminal in eyes of the law. While the same law states that maintenance is responsibility of the husband. 😥😔😞

@Shalini7448

22 күн бұрын

​@@ravindraprasad5486 jb husband wife dono earning h to ghr sambhalne ki responsibility wife ki hi kyu,

Excellent arguments by vakil sahab.

The Mr Justice is very hardworking,practical and knowledgeable judge.May God bless him so that he may impart Justice. 🙏

kya baat hai, msc wali ne 8th class wale se shadi kar li..

The advocate has done a superb advocacy specially explaining the skilled & unskilled labour..leaned & gained knowledge 👏

11 मिनिट से सही pitch वकील साहब की

Men don't divorce. Find solutions. It takes a lot of effort, intelligence and goodwill. But the end result is satisfying and highly beneficial to the children.

Dil khus ho gya itna achha❤ lawyer dekh k🎉🎉 stereotype judge ki ghamand todh di😂 This judge is always biased to wife.

Disagree with justice

Garib aadmi shadi na kare -Judge

Great appreciation for the Honorable Judge..his observation is examplry..

aurat MSC hoke bhi kaam nahi karna chahti, abled body to aurat bhi he....or section 125 ye to nahi kehta ki husband wife ko maintain kare, balki section 125 me spouse word likha he..or ishi base par kayi courts ne aurat se aadmi ko maintanence dilwaya he....par ye judge or bahut se or bhi judges ko ye baat samjh kyu nahi aati

@rajg4512

2 ай бұрын

As per my limited understanding…Judges ko sab samajh ata he but procedure ye he ki lawyer ko ye batana padega kis law me kon se Supreme Court ke order ke hisab se …yehi Lawyer ka kam he aur isi bat ke ache lawyer bahut charge karte he …Judge kisi ko favor nhi kar sakte …dono side ke lawyer ko proof karna he

@roughwork-jz9lh

2 ай бұрын

@@rajg4512 but in this video judge said that we can drive conclusion based on supreme court judgement, but what I believe that judge should refer the law first because supreme court judgements also can be altered based on situation & time. If law section 125 clearly use word "spouse" then why even saying that - husband ne shadi kyu kiya agar maintain nahi kar sakta.

@rajg4512

2 ай бұрын

@@roughwork-jz9lh you are logically correct but sometimes there might be contradictory judgements available …that’s a tuff situation for anyone…you share one judgment opposite party will share other judgement…unfortunately things are not straightforward.

@roughwork-jz9lh

2 ай бұрын

@@rajg4512 that's exactly is my point - why to refer judgements. Laws are already there, read the law & apply your wisdom based on evidences.

@rajenderupadhyay1920

2 ай бұрын

​@@roughwork-jz9lhUnder Hindu marriage Act it is assumed that the husband is head and chiefly responsible for his family's well being including wife, children and his elderly parents. The purpose of any Law is to achieve justice but it can never address every conceivable human situation. Hence, the need of Judges to interpret the laws operation in a particular life situation.

Wife why not working

जब वकील साहब ऐसी बहस करेंगे तो जज साहब को भी सही न्याय निर्णयन में परेशानी तो आएगी ही।

@PraveenSingh-ym4kn

2 ай бұрын

क्या एडवोकेट आउट ऑफ़ फैक्ट चला जाये और अपनी बेज्जती करवा ले

जज का बेहद ही बेहूदा तर्क है कि पति ने शादी क्यों की , अब ये ज्ञानचंद ये बताए कि एक पुरुष ,महिला से शादी करता है या एक महिला , पुरुष से शादी करती है, या दोनो एक दूसरे से शादी करते हैं,

@abhishekganguly123

2 ай бұрын

पहले थोड़ी इज्जत से, हाई कोर्ट का जज है और इतना पढ़ा लिखा तो आपके पूरे खानदान में नही होगा, उनका काम है कानून के हिसाब से फैसला देना किसी को गलत लगे या सही, बाकी वो कुछ भी बोले एक पार्टी को तो गलत लगेगा ही, अनस्किल्ड 5 लाख की गाड़ी में हाथ लगा के मिस्त्रियाई करता है पहली बार सुना, वैसे ये आपको समझ आएगी नही क्योंकि अगर गाड़ी होती तो कभी न कभी काम कराया होता और पता होता की खर्चा कितना लगता है दूसरी बात 5000 कमाने वाला हाई कोर्ट जा रहा है आप इतने बड़े ज्ञानचंद हो सकते हो जज नही। न खाता न बही वकील साहब जो कहे वही सही।

@wonderfulvideos944

2 ай бұрын

@@abhishekganguly123 , महाशय, आप ज्यादा ज्ञानी दिखाई पडते हैं, तर्क पढा नहीं और लगे हीरो बनने, जबाव है कोई तर्क का ?पहले वो देखिए, रही लिखाई पढाई, वो आपकी समझ के बाहर है,

@abhishekganguly123

2 ай бұрын

@@wonderfulvideos944 अरे भैया आप तो गुस्सा हो गए, तर्क और कुतर्क में थोड़ा सा अंतर है, जज का काम वकील के बातों में हां में हां मिलाना नही होता, जज की रिस्पेक्ट होनी चाहिए आपको उसकी बात पसंद हो या न हो, और ये वकील साहब केस हरवाने को तो तैयार बैठे है लड़की की शादी में एक पिता ने 8 लाख रुपए खर्च कर दिए तो उसे मेंटेनेंस नही मिलना चाहिए वाह तालिया घर में आपकी भी बहन बिटिया की शादी हुई होगी कितना खर्च होता है वकील साहब जज को समझा रहे की मैने कोई एक जजमेंट पढ़ा है पर क्या ये नही पता, बाकी एक हाई कोर्ट के जज की समझ मुझसे तो ज्यादा ही है, वकील साहब हाई कोर्ट में तो केस हार रहे, आप केस लेलेना सुप्रीम कोर्ट में।

@abhi.kaushik4495

2 ай бұрын

​@@wonderfulvideos944correct bro ye sab law men's ke against hi bane hai yaha nyaay ki umeed nahi.

शादी की जरूरत तो लड़की की भी।

Illiterate judge. If a person doesn't have a degree or certificate he isn't a skilled worker. That's how industries recruits.

jo sath naa rahe, sath naa de...vo jeewan sathi kaisi. usko koi maint dena galat hai. Anyay hai.

कोई भी गाड़ी दो पहियों के बिना नहीं चलती, बजतीं हैं चूड़ियां दो हों हाथों में। पिता ने इतना रुपया बर्बाद कर दिया इतना रुपया में कोई भी रोजगार स्थापित किया जा सकता है।

1 पति 5000 से ज्यादा ही कमाता होगा। stereo की वाइरिंग भी कोई सीधा सरल काम नहीं है। 2 इस बात का कोई जिक्र नहीं कि पत्नी क्यों नहीं कमा रही। 3 5000 में घर का खर्च चलना मुश्किल है, परंतु पति पत्नी दोनों कमाए और दोनों घर का काम करे तो 10000 में चल सकता है। 4 पति की इंकम यह है, वो स्किल्ड है या नहीं है, उसने शादी के समय पर मैट्रमोनीअल साइट पर क्या लिखा होगा, 5000 में घर चल सकता होगा या नहीं , यह सारे तो अनुमान और अंदेशा लगा लिए, पर पत्नी क्यों छोड़कर गई, काम क्यों नहीं कर रही, वो घर नहीं रहेगी तो घर का काम कौन करेगा , इस से पति की कमाने का समय कम होगा, इन बिंदुओं पर विचार तक नहीं हो रहा !

Phle boy..bhut.. educated hota h...phir divorce ki baat aate hi... Uneducated ho jata h... Are..bhai..phle..jhoot bolke shadi krte ho....sochte ho ab kha jayegi.... Are paglo...court hi jayegi...

even if u have no law degree but have the ability to settle the dispute / support him with his arguments & settle it (equal to repairing / fixing), then will he be labeled as skilled advocate/ lawyer??? Honourable judge is unnecessarily complicating. let this honourable judge his opinion on my doubt.

Shaadi ke time ladkewale agar ladki jyada padhi likhi ho toh bolte hain unhe housewife chahiye.. divorce ke time bolte hain ki ladki khud kamaaye ! Ladki ke bhai baap issi tension mein hote hain ki ladki ko job karne de ya nahi..

Now a day we are talking about gender equality husband and wife both are earning. This judge have mentallity of 1947. in divorse case maintaince is for spouce thats not geneder specific in law. If both are earning then no one can get. If husband is earning less and wife is more wife will give maintainace for Husband. Pata nahee kis desh kaa kannon iss judge nahee padhaa hain

Very well argument by advocate sahab

electrition hi hota hai vo,judge is right

Judges are Blindly taken Side of women...but actually in LAW doesn't specify only husband should pay for maintenance... But actually it is defined. In LAW either husband or wife can claim for maintenance. But if anyone raising voice against false judgement it will b easily molded To Contamept of Court.. it's not good for indian Society,

@abhi.kaushik4495

2 ай бұрын

Andha kanon, legal terrorism isko hi bolte hai.

pati kamaye patni baith ke khaye ye matlab hai is judge ka

@SiratKalra-rr1hl

2 ай бұрын

To paida hote hi hizre bn Jaya kro boys....fir tum b baith kar khana patni ki tarah .......kiyo tumare maa baap boy paida hone pr faltu k dhol bajate firte h....

@AnkitYadav-ej2cc

2 ай бұрын

@@SiratKalra-rr1hl tum hijra ho kya 😂😂

@ravindraprasad5486

2 ай бұрын

Now a day we are talking about gender equality husband and wife both are earning. This judge have mentallity of 1947.who make him judge in divorse case maintaince is for spouce thats not geneder specific in law. If both are earning then no one can get. If husband is earning less and wife is more wife will give maintainace for Husband. Pata nahee kis desh kaa kannon iss judge nahee padhaa hain

@ravindraprasad5486

2 ай бұрын

Kaam Karo kamao aur husband kau bhee maintainnace dain

@SiratKalra-rr1hl

2 ай бұрын

@@ravindraprasad5486 husband apne baap se maintenance maange.....wife se ni.....itna to dimaag rkho.... because dahej se wife tumara muh phle hi bhar chuki hoti h.....

Very kushal lawyer, I wish everyone was as dedicated to the cause

bhai raj mistress ki bhi income 500/day hoti hai. yeh kon hai jo 5000 rupya pe survive kar raha hai

inko jaj banata kon pati rakhna chahata hai patni rahena nhi chahai to ye bolte hum kuch nhi kar sakte agar patni bole mai rahena chahati hoon or pati mana kare to ye jo jaj bane pathe hai to pati ko bolte jail jai ya paise do inka kanoon he dogla hai

जब वो तलाक़ नहीं लेना चाहती तो वो एक तरह की अर्धांगिनी हुई। अर्धांगिनी भी खुद के लिए आधा कमा कर पति के maintains का आधा खर्च तो कम कर सकती है।

Very good defence by advocate

Simply the petitioner is non skilled worker as he is only able to install music system in the vechile, And not skilled worker because he cannot repair the music system

In most of the cases electricians are doing all the job wring as well as installation of stereo system in cars. Is not skilled person he has launched only to install stereo.

chaudhary sahab ne mja bandh diya

When God make relationship. Then how could judge put the wrong judgement against the husband.

Aadmi hona hi Gunah.h...court ki nazar m....

Trap में आसानी से आ गए,,,, भूमिका पर प्रश्न चिन्ह

वकील🗿🗿🗿

@Nitin-vy7dl

6 күн бұрын

Tera munh

Mard kitne time akela rehga, matrimony me add de to isko itna kyan problem he

Yeh kahna galat hai ki wife MSc hai use kamakar khana chahiye, fir pati ki patni ke prati kya jimmedari hai mein aisi kai ladies ko janta hun jo highly qualified hain Science graduate hain, MBA hain, prarambh se naukri nahi ki, shadi isliye hui ki husband rich family se hain achhi khetibadi hai dukane means kai dukane achhe rent par di hui hain, mother father senior advocate hain, ab patni naukri karna chahti hai BSc ke adhar par 5000 se adhik ki teaching nahi milti, MBA is liye bekar ki 10-12 salon tak uska upyog nahin kiya, to aisi patni ko kya samman janak gujara bhatta pane ka adhikar nahi hai pati yeh kah kar chutti pa lega ki jamin, dukane, papa ki hain main to 20 hajar kama pata hun ismein se de dia jai, papa ke ghar me mein to AC mei rahunga, car mein ghumunga lekin patni ke liye kuch nahin hai

@ravindraprasad5486

2 ай бұрын

Now a day we are talking about gender equality husband and wife both are earning. This judge have mentallity of 1947.who make him judge in divorse case maintaince is for spouce thats not geneder specific in law. If both are earning then no one can get. If husband is earning less and wife is more wife will give maintainace for Husband. Pata nahee kis desh kaa kannon iss judge nahee padhaa hain

@sumitjain4701

Ай бұрын

What about Gender equality, self dependency.. 😂😅 ab ye sb kahan gya.?? 😊

Please read sec 125 crpc, a wife who is unable to maintain herself , how an educted, abled body girl cannot maintain herself.

@garrysekhon542

2 ай бұрын

Do you think India has no unemployed with masters degree?

@rahulvasudeva9303

2 ай бұрын

Y the same is not applicable to man then. After all men and women are equal.

Why both not thought at the time of marriage this thing?

शादी अकेले का लड़के ने करी शादी तो लड़की ने भी करी

14:51..... High court mai .. Hindi........🙆

lekin kaha likha hai husband ko hi khana khilna hai? ladki saadi kyun kia??

महिलाओं को लाचार समझना है या पत्नियों को लाचार कमजोर जो पढ़े भी तो कोई काम का नही है और पति या पुरूष तो नारी से ज्यादा ही मजबूत होता है अधिकांश यही कोर्ट का कहना होता है और यह सच भी हो मै नही जानता मै कुछ समझ नही पाया कोई तो बताये

This is really very unfartunate and uuhuman and shows the sickness of mind of the system and society .

up gov is paying 8000 to contract basis employee, But judge has no meaning of it because this or that male judges are SIMP ,

Kya hoga agar maint ke baad kuch patiyo ne patnio ki accident aur dusre tareeko se ...tab bahut kuch badal jayega...tab tak yahi sab jhelo...don't take me wrong but I have sixth sense, I sensed many things in life which are exactly done within a time period. Don't do this at all. But I can see results, nature changes.

Esko social networking samajik gatividhiyon pata nahi patniyon avsarvaadi mansikta ko hunar samajh rahi hai

India me judgment ke nam pe drama chalta hai

jo kama sakta hai usko job karne ke liye kyu naa kaha jaye, admi to jobless ho to bhi usko keh dete hai ki chori karlo, bheek maang lo lekin paisa do. yeh sab dictatorship kaise nahi hai. patni ko admi ne paida nahi kiya hai, keval shadi hi kiya hai, to bol do shadi ek guanh hi hai, band karne ko kahe ladko ko shadi se.

Ye judge ke paas jatee kyon ho wife ne shaadi kyon ke judge sahab...

Judge khud hi joothi wife ke wakil ban jate hain ,galat ke favour main bolte hain,wah Indian kanoon😅America hasta hoga inhe sunkar,yeh developed country ka dava karte hain😊

Kya pati hi galat hota hai.judge sahab .patni par bhi bichar karo.

शादी तो लड़की ने इसके साथ की है।

System jimeddar hain

Acha hi mene shadi nahi ki warna judge mhuje bali ka bakra banata.

@Nitin-vy7dl

6 күн бұрын

😅

लड़की को भी देखना था न

the advocate has very low vocabulary

Pati jhoota haj. Ajkal koi majdoor bhi 30000 se kam nahi kamata..

@avi1999-m9h

28 күн бұрын

Abe bhai you are right but 2024 ki baat nahi rahi hai DYAAN SE SUNO 2014 and 2015 ki bat ho rahi hai yaha

@yashodam6695

27 күн бұрын

@@avi1999-m9h tab bhi koi bhi 15k se kam nahi kamata tha.. agar wo kamata hai to.. ab nithalla aadmi kya kahe.. mere hisaab se to kai baar aise bande se picha chhudana behtar hota hai.. warna gale me saanp leke ghumne ka koi fayda nahi.. zindgi nark ho jati hai

आटो इलेक्ट्रॉनिक इंजिनियर है श्रीमान वकील शाहब जो कार में काम करने का अच्छा पैसा लेते हैं 🌹🙏🇨🇮

Shadi sirf pati ne hi ki thi kya patni ne kya kiya tha.judge bolta hai aise marf hone ka matlab hai paise ped se leke aao aur haramkhor aurato ko paise do.

@bhaktisagar1269

Ай бұрын

Itna hi tha toh shadi kyu kiya agar kama nahi sakte toh ghar jamai bano jake saas sasur ki seva karo aur bachhon ka naam maa ke naam se hoga

Stupid lawyer. How can unskilled worker instal sound system in a car? There are lakhs of self employed people who dont have any certificates but still make good money. Car stereo does not go bad and rarely needs any repairs.