I feel like Uther is the definition of too specific. You either build your deck around it or you don't play it

@calebbonney4193

7 ай бұрын

He's specific, but that deck was really good for a while

@KhristianBolano

7 ай бұрын

When Uther was legal in Standard, he was a late game win condition for Control Paladin decks. You don't really have to make a deck around his hero power to make it powerful, because the hero power alone creates a lot of pressure by itself. You HAVE to do something about the hero power every turn or you'll eventually lose. That, without taking in account any of the other cards the Control Paladin would play against you. Maybe not the win condition against aggro and midrange, but vs control decks? That's probably the most powerful card of the matchup. Regarding Wild, he doesn't have any relevant impact compared to other cards so of course he's not gonna be played.

@Aldrius

7 ай бұрын

@@KhristianBolano The summons had too little health to ever work that way. It wasn't hard to clear a 2/2 every turn. The card saw play whenever control paladin was good, but because of the weapon, not because of the hero power.

@lucjanl1262

6 ай бұрын

The weapon by itself was quite good, 30 health swing, but not quite worth 9 mana

@zerti86

6 ай бұрын

putting Uther on the same power level as jaina, malfurion, rexxar and guldan is just wild to me.

You kinda need to decide what criteria you are ranking the cards on before ranking them. For some of these you go "Oh, this card was powerful x years ago, deserves Strong tier" and for others you go "This was powerful x years ago but sees no play today, put it in Mid." Makes it harder to take the video seriously when the goalposts are shifting constantly. For example Rexxar was one of the best cards in the format in KnC (spell/secret hunter) because of the infinite value hero power + board clear + 5 armour all for 6 mana, making it the best long term value card at the time. However, it sees zero play now because the hero power is less useful, the archetype it supports is currently bad in wild, and the card is too slow and weak nowadays. So it should either go in Strong/OP, or Bad. Nitpicky sidenote, but putting Xyrella, Brukan, and Tavish above Tamsin and Dr. Boom below Uther and Jaina (card that got nerfed to 9 mana vs cards that never saw Tier 1 meta play) are the most baffling choices I've ever seen wtf were you cooking.

Jaina was much better than Brukan in their respective meta games, and no one plays either in wild. She was even strong when she came back into standard for a while

@DiabloTommaso

7 ай бұрын

Some versions of shudder used it, no reason now with reeno

@Jermu-

7 ай бұрын

Bru'kan really doesn't deserve to be that high, he was the weakest of the alterac hero cards. I'd put him in mid.

@DjVerse100

7 ай бұрын

Almost every shaman list that runs shudder (shudderwock shaman or Highlander shaman) runs Bru’Kan

@Thelius42

7 ай бұрын

Brukan was in every shudderwok deck until very recently

@xtrasquish

7 ай бұрын

@@DjVerse100 Used to. No reason to with reno in the game now. Just play highlander shudder

Keeping Jaraxxus in "Bad" when it was a main stay Warlock decks for ages is crazy

@eggscheese2763

Ай бұрын

It was even played when it reduced your health to 15. 2 mana 6/6 is just super OP

At 17 min, there is no world where Malfurian is stronger than Dr. Boom. Sure he's more consistent, but the value of giving all mechs you play rush at the time was insane. Edit: I think Rokara is played in Odyn decks for 15 damage to face. Edit: Zul'Jin probably has one of the most busted Battlecries of any Hero card in line with Gul'dan, Varden, and potentially even Reno. The only thing's holding him back are his cost and shitty Hero Power.

@tempy2440

7 ай бұрын

I agree with this so much, Dr Boom is the whole reason discover weighting no longer favours class cards if neutral cards exist within said discover pool.

You need to rate based off of how good they were in the meta in which they existed in

@amaze3727

7 ай бұрын

It's weird because he judged some of them based off of the meta they were in, and then swapped the criteria multiple times throughout

@giangole

7 ай бұрын

I was gonna post it, like Guldan was super strong at release, now is unplayable in wild, while uther was barely played at the time and I've never seen in it , in the last 5 years.

@alexparadise6121

7 ай бұрын

I think part of the problem with that is very few of these were weak or even mid in their metagame. Like hero cards are designed to be very strong the majority of them were auto includes. Then you end up just ranking the classes during that time which depends more on other sets than the hero cards.

@SapoQLxd

6 ай бұрын

@@giangole guldan was my favourite card back when it was in standard. time to time whenever i play hearthstone and play wild I still play it just because of the nostalgia hahah

@zerti86

6 ай бұрын

@@SapoQLxd Guldan was the best hero card by a mile for a long long time in standard and in wild. this list is all over the place

I never seen a tier list that i dislike every pick like this one. Good work! Liked and subscribed, please do more!

Hi! It was a very fun video to watch Rarran however I felt like you've missed the point in this list. In my opinion a Tier List like this, should be made based how those cards performed in their respective meta game in Standard. Whether the HC is played in Wild shouldn't be really taken into consideration because the vast majority of them got powercrept, and the only that see play were released recently or their effect is artificially improved through an interaction with a different card. (f.e. Shadowreaper Anduin + Raza). It is also the same reason why I think that rating the power of these cards without the context of when were they released and played is also pointless, cause new cards are just stronger and faster. ALSO all Hero cards saw some play at some point so its even more unfair to mix them up as much IMO. Here is how I would change the ranking of these cards, based on their impact of the Standard meta: 1. Shadowreaper Anduin should've been put in BROKEN tier. During its time it was essentially unrivaled, other decks were forced to play tech cards specifically to have a fighting chance against Highlander Priest. It was amongst the strongest decks we'd seen at that point in time and that wouldn't exist without it. 2. Bloodreaver Gul'Dan deserves a STRONG tier. Gul'Dan was one of the main reasons why Cubelock and later Even Lock were as strong as they were. Ofc the first deck was mainly created because of Kobolds but without the card it would've been much more manageable. It allowed to outvalue and outtempo other control decks while being a safe play against aggro players (mostly through taunt demons). 3. I don't understand why Rogue and Shaman Galakronds were put so low. SG was so dominant that it had to be nerfed alongside its designated cards, and no deck stood a chance against it other than itself or GR. GR got nerfed as well because of the chokehold it had on the meta. 4. Uther of the Ebon Blade should be placed in MID at best, I think that bad would be even better. Why? It was tough to play, slow and not a lot of impact, used mostly as a heal 20 and maybe threaten a game over. Sounds good in theory but during its time it wasn't always played, and it didn't make a huge impact. It was a worse filler than Malfurion the Pestilent because it wasn't as flexible, and a worse win condition than Jaina, or Anduin. Uther's Combo deck was not very strong and failed to deliver. Bonus points for the animation. 5. Frostlich Jaina should be either on top of GOOD or in the low of STRONG. She was played through her entire lifespan, she was tricky to play, and was slow but once played successfully, she sealed would single-handedly turn control match-ups around. She would give you the power of immortality and value and was always a threat to any slower deck. Most notable decks I can think of would be: Odd Mage, Grinder Mage. 6. Dr.Boom broke the meta once again when he was released for 7 mana. He made Control Warrior so incredibly strong and dominant that not only other decks couldn't fight against it, it even forced its own deck to tech against itself. That is considered power. There are a few more changes (Hagatha, Garrosh, Thrall, Thrall, Reno, etc) but I'm tired of writing for now. Tell me what you think, and keep up the great content man! You made my love for HS come back and you became my favourite youtuber as of the moment.

@amaze3727

7 ай бұрын

Facts, because otherwise most of them would fall in "bad" since they would obviously be powercrept by the newer ones, and instead it would be a tier list representing which hero cards are the newest (on top) and oldest (on the bottom)

@flyingsquirrel1486

7 ай бұрын

TRAGIC I was gonna just read ur comment instead of watching the video this is the actual content I clicked for. Good shit good summary I’d read more if u typed more

@JorisVDC

7 ай бұрын

"6. Dr.Boom broke the meta" Oh yes, I really hated to see that card dropped back than. Especially since I love to play hunter. It made the match-up really feel bad and only winnable when they didn't drew their Dr. Boom Hero. The rush aspect was just so hard, back when Rush was still uncommon.

@Garmodon

7 ай бұрын

I disagree on Uther. Combo pally, whether horseman, shirvallah, or hybrid, was a high skill, high winrate deck. Constantly brought into tournaments.

@Alt-o-holic47

7 ай бұрын

Completely agree here. People only ran Uther for either the combo or for a control type deck, which in Paladin at the time, was unheard of. I would also say, Jaraxxus being in the bad category was a massive overlook for the cards power. The fact that it was ran in both Handlock and Zoolock and was a main stay in those decks until Bloodreaver came out, and still saw play after that in the nerfed state, should say how powerful it was.

Bro, rogue Galakrond in mid is crazy.

Should've ordered them based on how powerful the cards were during their time. This tierlist kind of sucked ngl

@RedGalbot

7 ай бұрын

I disagree. He talked about their standard impact, but also considered how they've held up over the years. That's a much better way to do a tier list.

@eicheldrei7408

7 ай бұрын

@@RedGalbotit’s not all in hs there is to much powercreep, a lot of cards 7 years ago are pure dogshit now

@shade3385

7 ай бұрын

​@@eicheldrei7408Sounds like quitter talk.

@m.r.r.2636

7 ай бұрын

The parameters on which the cards were evaluated was not clear at all. Seeing Frost Lich Jaina placed in good tier with Bloodreaver Guldan in strong tier was baffling, as at the time in Standard both were highly played. I believe Jaina was actually played more because it was easier to fit into many of the Mage control decks, midrange decklists, or elemental decklists, both to stabilize against aggro or other midrange who sought to close out the game or as a value engine to grind out against other control.

@PokeArtistAce

7 ай бұрын

Probably upset that he saw Dr boom so low, it’s okay my guy, you don’t need to be mad at Rarren because he made a list of his own. Make your own list smh

If you build your FL Jaina deck with a bunch of AOE elementals you basically have a deck with 10 Reno Jackson's.

Rexaar was a powerhouse during Rastakhan's Rumble, should be in Broken. Vicious Scalehide changed everything for him.

@Bladius_

4 ай бұрын

Not to mention, it saw wild play all the way up until... Around, Festival of legends? I got to legend in wild with beast hunter, while it was bad, using both Rexxar and Tavish. (Hunter was so dire I only saw 2 hunters on my climb and they were playing spells, beat both of them.) You mainly used Rexxar in wild for the boardclear but, with him being a standard power house and holding onto a spot in wild for over 5 years, he for sure deserves mid-strong.

This list made me sweat...I soon learned this was power now, but seeing so many meta-warping cards in Mid hurts.

The standard for each hero card changes? Like dude you changed your reasoning for every single one

Hey Rarran I'd appreciate if you could edit those cards for everyone to see and read - these tierlist images are way to small. Thanks man

Rarran, I think you should spend a video discussing & experiencing the current (and previous) state(s) of wild. It would be excellent content and it’s clear a lot of players don’t know too much about the format since Blizzard pushes standard so much. Plus it’ll help ranking videos like these. Please consider taking a look into Wild and try to hit legend to really experience the blessing and curse that is the Wild format lol. I would love to see your experience

Did he say that Jaraxxus was not good because Zoo Warlock was infinitely better (than Handlock or more generally controlling Warlocks)? Because I don't think that is correct at all. Zoo was obviously the better ladder deck because you could finish 5 games in the time that a control deck finished one, but in tournaments you really couldn't comment on one of the Warlocks being strictly better than the other, it just depended on what you needed the deck to do in your lineup. If anything I'd say that at a high level Handlock was the better one, you had people like Lifecoach putting up some ridiculous numbers with the deck, which was probably the most dominant a player has been within hearthstone ever. Handlock's difficulty was generally overstated a bit, but imo it would benefit a lot more from modern players going back to it than Zoo, maybe enough to have it be the better choice for ladder. It also is a lot more flexibile than Rarran is making it out to be. There are the blowout matchups where you just win after playing Jaraxxus, but the combination of armor, a weapon and slower value meant it was almost always a great topdeck - obviously you can't play it in the early phases of the game, but that is true about every hero card. There was even a brief timeframe when people ran Sacrificial Pact (?) because you could target any Demon instead of just friendly and it allowed you to oneshot opposing Jaraxxus which came up often enough that it was a good metacall for the ditto. Reasonable to put it in mid in the context of modern heroes, but the phrasing where he was thinking about old hearthstone meta made it seem like he got to that conclusion in a backwards way.

for cariel, if you have to slot a tech card in just because of one card for one class instead of any other card... the card is broken. there was no other serious reason to run weapon tech in the meta at the time except for cariel, she isnt as broken as guff but making your deck worse for one matchup is definitely grounds for being broken

@Bladius_

4 ай бұрын

Also, not to mention hunter could not beat that deck, because ooze either wasnt in standard or we couldn't play it because it was complete brick outside of Paladin. We couldn't run viper because it fudged our pet collector. I'm biased as a hunter-only player, but that card legit made me quit like twice, because there was literally nothing I could do to play around it.

Looking at this list makes me realise how few hero cards have been made for paladin, just the 2 even though its an OG class. And both are awesome design-wise (imo) waiting for the next paladin hero card

Keep up the work Rarran! Kicking ass and taking names!

Okay stopped after Jaina was in Mid crazy list

@starwars385

7 ай бұрын

she was never that good, not to mention the decks that would include her kinda sucked compared to other meta stuff

Naughty Valeera was so good for thief/control rogue (my main). Play her, then Vanish + double Doomsayer (HP) and then you have the board and endless value after. Had mine crafted in all that glittering gold.

Scourgelord garrosh was a card you played in control warrior, and felt REALLY bad about it every single time

this hero tier list needs some fixing, it's fine to have an opinion, but frost lich jaina and jarraxus felt dirty I know they're not that strong but from their text/hero power alone they should be 1 tier higher than their group, summon a 2 mana 6/6 each turn, 2 mana maybe get a water elemental plus all elementals have lifesteal are solid. though i understand that Arran lowered them because: - frost lich jaina hero power is considerably harder to proc, plus the lifesteal feels very mediocre if you don't play many elementals (having only water elemental from hero power using the lifesteal feels lackluster) - jarraxus is less used because it's a standard card with very basic powers (comparatively boring than other hero cards), and the fact that it used to limit your HP to 15 negatively affects its popularity (I mean as a playable card, it's still iconic) - came from an older era (heck jaraxxus was technically the first), so both cards are slow, don't have amazing card synergies (maybe), and don't have flashy payoff and lingering effects (needs more than just jaina's elemental lifesteal)

Uther Deathknight is played in Wild, I lost to "your hero power casts twice" Uther a couple times lol

Format vs Lt. Eddy where you need to play all hero cards before winning?

Thrall was probably most fun hero card released till today , made insanely fun evolve shaman deck that had decent win rate with cards like doppelgangster and jades.

Enjoyed this Rarran! Thanks!

Exodia Uther was probably the most fun I ever had playing hesrthstone 😂 I'm coming back to the game after a long time, and I had a little success with it in wild, as long as you don't run against a aggro deck it can work 😅

Deathstalker rexxar mid aint no way

I cant believe Dr.Boom is hanging out in mid with all those shitters

Rexxar was insane. It let you play an aggro deck on the first few turns and still have a good endgame.

Great job papa Rarran, love your ids and hope your having a lovely day

It's so funny watching Rarran ask, "Is this played in Wild?" for like 8+ mana cards. Well, you can see pretty much everything at low ranks, but even just past gold wild is basically only hyper aggro and combo decks. You can still do well with any deck that beats all the even shaman and aggro rogue bots, but there's no real competitive control decks (closest I can think of slower combos like Shudder that only work with heavy disruption). This tier list really feels all over the place, definitely should have rated more based on the metas they were a part of. Dr. Boom being mid imo is the worst one here, he absolutely warped the entire game and nothing even came close at the time.

Rarran, gratz on doing a video that everyone disagree with, I've rarely see such an accomplishment on KZread, usuallt there's like some dude defending the video or whatever but here there is none, I've just seen a guy saying "do your own list if you disagree" which is always a bad argument so I don't really count that guy. But anyway GG truly impressive. Also ofc I'm totally agains't 90% of the ranking

Hi my name is Guff!!! How this card never was nerfd lol 20 mana crystals allow any OTK you want Aviana, toggwaggle, Tony, Majordormo, linecracker, denathtius, Cthun, malygos ... in wild its so toxic

Rarran is the hearthstone equivalent of those people who give every film ever made a 7

Dawngrasp is definitely broken and Valeera definitely would see play in wild it creates so many comboes really

Practically none of these cards are played in wild so judging them off that seems a little strange. If that were the case, they would mostly just be in the bad category

@Liamo051

7 ай бұрын

He didn’t, he judged them across their whole lifespan?

@Regnier191

7 ай бұрын

What? Cairel, Guff, Kurtus, Tamsin, Anduin, Rokharra, Dawngrasp. All see play in Wild.

@haydenmcqueen2503

7 ай бұрын

@@Regnier191 So like 7 out of 31 hero cards, Really impressive.

@Liamo051

7 ай бұрын

@@haydenmcqueen2503 yeah but he’s not primarily judging them on that is he. He’s discussing their use in standard and then factoring in continued use thereafter. There’s always gotta be someone poking holes hasnt there

@shyuki5014

7 ай бұрын

@@haydenmcqueen2503Its almost like most of them got bad because newer cards tend to be stronger than old ones 😱 so the fact that some are still good to this day IS impressive and most classes still use a hero card there is no reason to play 2 of them

Uther has a better version now in Wild with the duplicates hero power and the you can use your hero power twice! pretty juicy combo!

13:45 Weapon tech is not “playing around” cariel. it is DECKBUILDING around cariel. very different things.

I actually play reno galikrond shaman in wild. Never faced the mirror though

Galakrond warrior was by far 2nd strongest stand alone and strongest if you count decks at the time and usage, having that buff your 3 2 drakes that summon copies was overpowered and at the time galakrond warrior had the highest winrate out of all galakronds and other decks, and that is for a reason

Rexxar oscilated a lot depending on if his zombie pool was updated.

I laughed my ass off at the guy in chat calling every second hero card broken

Real fans know Rarran posted this on his main channel first

Bro you can’t rate bloodreaver guldan, the first hero card for warlock, against Reno? The meta has changed so much

personally i would move frost lich Jaina to strong- broken but apart from that i agree with the rest.

Rarran really has the worst tierlists in HS kekw

Think he'll do best to worst quests next 🙃

the amazing reno was top tier lol

Reno so good I made my sif mage singleton.

Man, you are getting roasted in these comments… It’s a tier list of how you felt about stuff, not an objective, stats based list. Thanks for the content.

zul'jin got turbo banned in duels that card feels crazy i would have put Varden in Broken

Dr. Boom deserves broken tier. Control warrior was the best deck back in Rise of Shadows. The reason for that was Dr. Boom was so insane back then. He was so broken that they nerfed him by 2 mana instead of 1 like they usually do.

The no reason to play should be Malfurion. Since there is Guff why would you play that?

this list is all over the place

If we are talking about if these cards see play now, all Knights heroes go to no reason to play

death knight cards literally broke arena when they were released. speciffically jaina, rexxar and anduin. if you drafted one of those cards, it's basically 10 wins for free. in my opinion, if you ban a card from a game mode, the card is broken.

Rarran knows about hero ability? Alakir have the best, +2 damage, windfury and divine shield for hero is broken

Bru'kan is definitely not strong, he belongs in mid. The weakest of alterac heroes and even Jaraxxus sees more play than him. And Valeera is still good in wild because gaining stealth is such a powerful effect. I'd put her in good, she deserves higher. And if this list was based purely on the cards' time in standard, Cariel would be broken, Kurtrus would be strong, mage Reno would be good, Jaraxxus would be good.

When you have no opinion u can just placed everything near good but its just bad thinking

Actually very spot on listing and commentary, I just personally think that FL Jaina deserves her own tier "delete this pls" we might as well include Dawngrasp since these cards, while specific for an archetype, were auto include in any slower deck. Jaina sees no play now, but while in standard was absolutely outrageous to play against. Instant surrender when the enemy plays her. Dawnfuck was annoying as well, especially since the hero power cards were insane at the time with the guitar guy and the little shlt that pinged all enemies. Dawnfuck is even played in wild since she is another ice block for the ice block > rewind > ice block defense that any stupid time warp combo deck uses.

tavish and brukan were good cards. it is certifiably insane to have at any point ranked them above Jaina or Boom. permanent rush and permanent life steal with upgraded hero powers is so much stronger than either of lavishes or brukanns stuff.

@Flyhr

7 ай бұрын

But Brukan gets the battlecry Shudderwock combo, its a very reliable card in Wild even still. The choice of 2/4 options on its battlecry makes it versatile. Need to kill your opponent ( 6 damage to face + 1 more utility) Need to stabilize vs aggro? (Heal for 6 and board clear for 2 or 2 summon taunts + gain 5 armor). I'm just saying Jaina is more deck reliant on having elementals already in your deck where Brukan is good in any control shaman. All the Wild Top Legend Shudderwock decks run Brukan even the Highlander variations.

@zerti86

6 ай бұрын

@@Flyhr yea but you cannot take this into consideration. you can't say rogue galakrond is good because of it's hero power but brukan is strong because of shudderwock. the deck shouldn't matter because nobody played galakrond rogue. brukan is incredibly mid while jaina was unbelievably strong just by itself. it's also hilarious that you say jaina was deck reliant (not true btw) right before you say that every shudderwock deck runs brukan. good job buddy

@Flyhr

6 ай бұрын

@@zerti86 I said "in any control Shaman deck," Shudderwock is just the strongest variant. Just break down what each hero does by itself. Jaina - 9mana - gain 5 armor - summon a 3/6 elemental. Give elementals lifesteal, hero power deal 1 damage, if kills summon an 3/6 elemental. (if you have no elementals in deck your only playing this card for the one damage honorable kill for potential to generate those elementals.) Like I said in a vaccum Brukkan is far more versatile. He has a far superior battlecry and his rotating hero power is less reliant on specific conditions. What is your argument that Jaina is a better card right now, I'm not talking as of release...

Frost Lich Jaina need to get mana buffed if she want to see play in wild nowadays. Turn 9 is to far away, especially against aggro that usually kill you around turn 5. And there is litterly no reason to play Furion when Guff exists. I mean holy hell, guff sits on 5 mana when it would still see play at 10 (becaus druid) and gain an effect way much stronger than cards like Rexxar or Jaina.

Rokara hero card is counter to neptulon priest

Should have rate them for what they were in their meta…by saying if you play them now is really pointless

Saw jaina as F tier in thumbnail and im like dafuq was huge in standard at its time, most mage variants were playing it because summoning a 3/6 lifesteal was strong.

@hihigocat

6 ай бұрын

thumbnail is clickbait, he doesnt even use letter ratings

He is sleeping on Dr. Boom. He should have been higher

Kurthus and Guldan should be at least strong! Jaraxxus is not bad also!

This tierslist feel all over the place. Between the strength of the card when it was realeased, how strong it was during it's life time or how it stands now in wild now... you could almost do 3 tier lists. Mixing it up can't give an accurate view of the cards, especially with a lack of background research. Well tier list are a good clickbait and give the comment section a nice time, i guess it's good for the stats. I won't complain since i like what you do overall. I just feel this i really rushed.

There's no way tamsin is worse than bru'kan

@zerti86

6 ай бұрын

i think tamsin was in every warlock deck while nobody played shaman ever.

You should not rate these cards based on wild. Wild is so broken right now that most of these cards do not see play. It is also clear that you really do not know what gets played in wild and what does not.

Tier list so bad he had to create more tiers

Only part of this I fundamentally disagree with is that Reno "has to be" broken. Even as a highlander payoff he's ridiculous. One sided full exile is an effect so strong that even MTG won't touch it, AND it stops the enemy from repopulating the board for a turn. It's revoltingly strong and shouldn't hit the enemy's centermost minion, maybe it should even be nerfed to a destroy effect. The tierlist itself is fine though.

My man is coping on some of these. Gonna finish the video first but some of these man… guldan is way too slow now if you’re counting wild, and it wasn’t the main reason that deck won games. Galakrond priest was much better than Galakrond warrior. Deathstalker Rexxar was always more fun then good

Did u just placed dirty old malfurion that summon 2 1/5 with worth hero power in “good” tier?😂😂😂😂😂😂 The only reason that piece of crap had any play is because druid was OP at that time with at least 4 different decks in standart, like it did see play, but i never saw this after, what a dum-dum jeez

Mis-gendered Dawngrasp, canonically a Non-Binary character, uses they/them

Deathstalker reksar broken tier cause u autolose as control vs hunt DK, literally 0 control decks in top100 leg and 90% hunters

10 mana reno needs to be nerfed to 2 minions or opponent can summon minions normally. Normally would make the million reno players I run into explode but this singular card has morphed the game into such a gimmick, as if zeph wasnt annoying before. No one even cares about reno

I don’t understand how the shaman hero didnt end up in no reason to play. This card sucked so much ass.

I feel sp wierd about rarran, i love his content, but has hes voice, Way of talking, reasoning for putting a card in a tier

Mid is a terrible term. It's used so ubiquitously that it has lost all meaning. It should not be replacing the "Good" spot xD.

rarran smoking hard copium to put frostlich jaina in "good" category when it was and still is lmao why would you play this unless u are guaranteed to enter fatigue. its like tier 4 at best.

dr boom mid .....stop the video enough bs

Brukan WAAAAY to high, brukan is mid at best

I'm early!

Very great video, people get wasaaay too butt hurt when someone makes a list/ their own opinion stuff. I think the list is good.

Nah Garrosh had no reason to be played, only dead man warrior played it and dead man warrior is not a deck that existed

That Thumbnail is straight up trolling.. the new meta is fr just lying now. I thought we woulnd't get there so soon but here we are. You can put anything in the thumbnail and nobody cares.. it's so sad where we're heading.

@hihigocat

6 ай бұрын

what do you mean "where we're heading", this type of thumbnail has been the standard for several years. this isnt anything new