Hawker Hurricane | Rolls-Royce Merlin Powered Fighter | Things You Might Not Know, Full Video
Ғылым және технология
The Hawker Hurricane was a British single-seat fighter aircraft manufactured by Hawker Aircraft, Ltd., in the 1930s and ’40s. The Hurricane was numerically the most important British fighter during the critical early stages of World War II, sharing victory laurels with the Supermarine Spitfire in the Battle of Britain (1940-41) and the defense of Malta (1941-42). Hurricanes served in all theatres of war where British forces were engaged.
The Hurricane emerged from efforts by Sydney Camm, Hawker’s chief designer, to develop a high-performance monoplane fighter and a March 1935 Air Ministry requirement calling for an unprecedented heavy armament of eight wing-mounted 0.303-inch (7.7-mm) machine guns. Designed around a 1,200-horsepower, 12-cylinder, in-line Rolls-Royce engine soon to be dubbed the Merlin, the Hurricane was an evolutionary development of earlier Camm designs, notably the Fury biplane fighter. A low-wing monoplane with retractable landing gear, the Hurricane, aside from its clean lines and heavy armament, was a conventional design. Its wings, rear fuselage, and tail surfaces were covered by fabric, though the fabric wing-covering soon gave way to aluminum.
The first Royal Air Force (RAF) fighter capable of exceeding 300 miles (480 km) per hour in level flight, the plane had excellent flight characteristics.
Hurricanes began entering squadron service in late 1937, and some 500 were on hand when Germany invaded Poland in September 1939. Hurricanes bore the brunt of air-to-air fighting in the Battle of France (May-June 1940), and Hurricanes equipped 30 squadrons (to 19 Spitfire squadrons) at the start of the Battle of Britain. The Hurricane I, the version that fought the battle, had a maximum speed of 330 miles (530 km) per hour (though in practice, this could be as low as 305 miles [490 km] per hour) and a ceiling of 36,000 feet (10,980 meters). Slower than the Spitfire, the Hurricane fought at a disadvantage to the German Bf 109 in climb and dive but proved to be a potent bomber destroyer, the concentrated fire of its eight machine guns literally sawing Luftwaffe bombers in half on occasion. In addition, the Hurricane was a forgiving aircraft to fly; this and its wide-set landing gear minimized landing accidents. Finally, the Hurricane’s conventional construction lent itself to speedy repair of battle damage, and shot-up Hurricanes returning quickly to service made an appreciable contribution to victory.
Later Hurricane models exploited the Merlin engine's steadily increasing power to carry heavier armament so that, though it was superseded as a front-line interceptor by 1941, it remained a capable fighter bomber. The Hurricane II was built in two main variants, one mounting no fewer than 12 0.303-inch machine guns in the wings and the other mounting four 0.8-inch (20-mm) automatic cannons. Hurricanes were equipped with sand filters for service in the North African desert, tail hooks, and strengthened empennages for duty as sea hurricane carrier fighters. Fitted with underwing bomb shackles, Hurricane fighter-bombers served in North Africa and remained in front-line service in Burma (Myanmar) and India through the war’s end. Later versions were modified to carry launching rails for air-to-ground rockets; some had a pair of underwing 1.6-inch (40-mm) cannons. Perhaps the most bizarre use of Hurricanes was as “Hurricats,” launched by rocket-powered catapults from merchant ships on one-way missions to defend North Atlantic convoys from German patrol bombers.
Hawker Hurricane General characteristics
Crew: One
Length: 32 ft 3 in (9.83 m)
Wingspan: 40 ft 0 in (12.19 m)
Height: 13 ft 1.5 in (4.001 m)
Wing area: 257.5 sq ft (23.92 m2)
Airfoil: root: Clark YH (19%); tip: Clark YH (12.2%)[177]
Empty weight: 5,745 lb (2,606 kg)
Gross weight: 7,670 lb (3,479 kg)
Max takeoff weight: 8,710 lb (3,951 kg)
Powerplant: 1 × Rolls-Royce Merlin XX V-12 liquid-cooled piston engine, 1,185 hp (884 kW) at 21,000 ft (6,400 m)
Propellers: 3-bladed
Performance
Maximum speed: 340 mph (550 km/h, 300 kn) at 21,000 ft (6,400 m)
Range: 600 mi (970 km, 520 nmi)
Service ceiling: 36,000 ft (11,000 m)
Rate of climb: 2,780 ft/min (14.1 m/s)
Wing loading: 29.8 lb/sq ft (145 kg/m2)
Power/mass: 0.15 hp/lb (0.25 kW/kg)
Armament
Guns: 4 × 20 mm (0.79 in) Hispano Mk II cannon
Bombs: 2 × 250 or 500 lb (110 or 230 kg) bombs
Watch more aircraft, heroes, and their stories and missions ➤ / @dronescapes
To support/join the channel ➤ / @dronescapes
IG ➤ / dronescapesvideos
FB ➤ / dronescapesvideos
X/Twitter ➤ dronescapes.video/2p89vedj
THREADS ➤ www.threads.net/@dronescapesv...
Colorized Photo Partial Credit: DB Color & Dronescapes
#hurricane #aicraft #ww2
Пікірлер: 30
Watch more aircraft, heroes, and their stories and missions ➤ www.youtube.com/@Dronescapes To support/join the channel ➤ www.youtube.com/@Dronescapes/join IG ➤ instagram.com/dronescapesvideos FB ➤ facebook.com/Dronescapesvideos ➤ X/Twitter ➤ dronescapes.video/2p89vedj ➤ THREADS: www.threads.net/@dronescapesvideos
enjoyed the hawker and jim brown information
My great grandfather flew these aircraft in world war two, with the Royal Air Force 312 (Czechoslovak) Squadron ^^
Glory goes to the aircraft and its designers that was most effective; ie the Spitfire. The Hurricane was available in more numbers during the BoB ONLY because Lord Nuffield delayed production of Castle Bromwich. One wonders if he had shares in Hawker. Camms best solution to meet the requirements of the next gen fighter would have been to update the Hurricane with a Meredith radiator scheme and and thinner wing, both problems of which he was fully aware in 1936. Kudos to the Vintage Wings lads for their restorations.
The Hurricane did far more then the Spitfire when one actually looks into it. Without it things would have been a lot different.
@pilot3016
6 күн бұрын
Correct.
@bobsakamanos4469
6 күн бұрын
The Hurricane had the lowest kill ratio of the battle. After that it wasn't really qualified as a front line day fighter but it was deployed anyways, to the detriment of our brave lads including my father.
I am incredibly impressed, by the illustrious career of Captain Brown. The expression isn't new, but after practising all the emergency procedures, and having had some of my own harrowing experiences, a pilot still wants to have a little luck. I had an all jet flying career, starting in 1965 on the Canadian Tutor. All the RCAF pilots in my generation, also got to fly the Canadian T-33, with no nosewheel steering, and the Rolls-Royce Nene 10 engine, which had the same engine acceleration problem as was described by Captain Brown. It was still a great aircraft to fly. I flew with a lot of the earlier generation of RCAF pilots who flew the Sabre in Germany, and all of them stated, that the Tutor, was the next best thing to the Sabre in terms of performance and handling. I think that the proof that, is that even though it has been retired as the basic training aircraft, it is still being used by the Canadian demonstration team, The Snowbirds.
@bobsakamanos4469
5 күн бұрын
Did you know Jim MacBain? He flew Sabres in Marville, Lorraine. The Mk.5 & 6 were much better than the standard Sabres.
@jjock3239
5 күн бұрын
@@bobsakamanos4469 I knew guys that were on squadron in Marville, but I had never met Jim MacBain.
@bobsakamanos4469
5 күн бұрын
@@jjock3239 short guy, red hair, older than you. How about Harvy May (Clunks) or Bob Stickley (T-33's in Rivers)
@jjock3239
5 күн бұрын
@@bobsakamanos4469 I knew Harv May, (Sabre generation), and Bob Stickley, (the RMC course ahead of mine in MJ). My instructor on T-Birds, was Mike Carle (Clunks in Europe).
@bobsakamanos4469
5 күн бұрын
@@jjock3239 Stick was a great guy. Started (Harvards) and finished (BComd) his career in Penhold.
I'm an American and I say Capt Brown was the BEST pilot of his generation PERIOD, regardless of citizenship.
@bobsakamanos4469
5 күн бұрын
Best test pilot, not best fighter pilot.
@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935
2 күн бұрын
He fought off Norway and the Bay of Biscay, he was taken off carriers because of his exceptional pilot skills.
@bobsakamanos4469
2 күн бұрын
@@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 test pilot skills are not equal to fighter pilots skills. Given time and opportunity, I'm sure he would have been a successful fighter pilot.
Can we have a ten hour compilation next please.
It is P not B
Modern russia looks exactly like fascist Germany of 1940
@MeYou-yz2yz
4 күн бұрын
And Modern Canada and UK are starting to look like USSR of 1940 apart from Angela Merkel's brown boyfriends everywhere.
, the spitfire has a German wing🤔
@bobsakamanos4469
6 күн бұрын
Nonsense. Do some reading on the facts instead of repeating lies from Netflix pseudo-documentaries..
@bobsakamanos4469
6 күн бұрын
Frederick Lanchester, english mathematician/engineer produce a paper on the benefits of the elliptical wing in 1907. Prandtl then cribbed that and produced his own paper in 1918 called the Lanchester-Prandtl wing theory. RJ Mitchell for his part knew all about elliptical wings and had used them since the 1920's.
@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935
2 күн бұрын
You mean Leigh-Mallory’s 12 Group? That’s a bit strong.
@bobsakamanos4469
2 күн бұрын
@@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 stop antagonizing people with uneducated hyperbole.
@kennethcrowther2277
Күн бұрын
Not at all. It was elliptical but not exclusively German. Also, the Spitfire's wing was designed by Canadian engineer, Beverly Shenstone. That's a man by the way. Beverly used to be a dual sex name.