Name a more iconic hand. I’ll wait. Remember to subscribe to the channel and like the video! Thanks so much for watching!

@PeterZaitcev

4 ай бұрын

For mage, this should probably be a quest TTK. For Rogue, I think Garrot Rogue was more iconic. Same for DH with Ilgynoth

@a.i.4462

4 ай бұрын

@@PeterZaitcevthe mage one is valid but would be incredibly broken or useless. Either you get quest spell and win next turn or you get the incomplete quest shard and play enough spells to get it

@user-bi8zh5tj9g

4 ай бұрын

​@@PeterZaitcev с илгинотом согласен абсолютно!!!

@denizturunc9721

4 ай бұрын

@MarkMcKz 16:42 you already had lethal on board, hence your opponent conceded.

Shudderlock isn't real it can't hurt you.

@Lunaraia

4 ай бұрын

Lies, the proof is in the video!

@pablord4476

4 ай бұрын

I have tried to do the combo with harth, but the battlecries triggered in a way that I didnt get any shudderlock to my hand :(

The game where he renounced into mage was insane... though from his closing comments, I guess he didn't realize he actually had lethal on the board when the guy conceded.

@mitch5944

3 ай бұрын

Lmao that was the nastiest renounce darkness of all time 😭

You gotta Grumble/Zola your Saronite as many times as possible to ensure the combo works if you get it from Harth, otherwise it’s only a 67% chance to work at all

@jackal327

4 ай бұрын

67% of the time works 100% of the time

@rafkak.

4 ай бұрын

the problem is you might get a lot of 9 mana shudder copies instead of the grumble 1 mana ones..so that depends on your luck i guess

@Av1

4 ай бұрын

​@@rafkak.having a 9 mana shudderwock is better than having none

@joaopc94

4 ай бұрын

​@@rafkak.One 9 mana shudder can still make a lot of new 1 mana ones, so it's probably worth it.

@andy02q

4 ай бұрын

​@@rafkak.He had enough time to setup grumble on Saronite and forgo the Zola.

That second game was nasty

Thanks for the awesome video. Love the decks you showcase in ur videos they seem fun to play.

The wock in shudderwock stands for w(arl)ock

I play an old deck but revised for wild based off Kripp's old Barnes, Y'serja , renounce. This is up my alley.

Tysm For the daily videos, I look forward to them every day 🥺

Worst patron warrior combo i've ever seen) Thanks for your videos!

@mica4977

4 ай бұрын

Was thinking the same XD

@andy02q

4 ай бұрын

Not using inner rage first, not using inner rage at all, not using the 1 att minion, the pain. But still way better than Shudderwock were he misplays his chances from >90% to 66% and then complains about his luck after getting lucky.

Love Harth just put into aggro decks that dump their hand. Played it in Kingsbane, got the Druid hand, and naturalized their taunt minion for lethal

Renounce Darkness, Embrace Dankness.

I could get shudder baby back in standard?! Or an extra shudder in my shudder deck? Love it! Lol

I am waiting for the shudderwock warrior deck to use with the new brann

I thought the last game was going to be Steam Cleaner in to Togwaggle druid.

Harth card states “iconic”, not “OP”, and Zola was certainly part of the early Shudderwock decks.

one single card wow thats insane plan b actually

Love your content

Well played

Agreed with the title.

Mega fun 😁😁😁😁

Very fun and interactive

I knew he'd go right into Renounce Darkness. I wanted to huild it; but I'm lacking to many cards to build Renounce at the moment. I also was sure Mark would have this day 1.

Imagine watching this video on your phone and you walk out of your room to grab a bite to eat while still watching this video with volume on blast because i left my headphones in my car all the house hears mark saying "ima drink your milkshake" wtf bro?!?!

It says "Once per game" - doesn't that mean bouncing it back to your hand and playing it again wouldn't repeat the effect? Otherwise what does that text mean, if not that? Copying it with Zola might work since it's a unique copy of the card, unless it literally means you can't repeat that effect at all by ANY means after the first time.

@mica4977

4 ай бұрын

Shutterwalk wasn't repeating it's effect so indeed it means you can't get a redo on what you get from him

@remove_the_fucking_at_sign

4 ай бұрын

You *cannot* get a new iconic hand by bouncing to hand, doubling with Brann, copying with Zola, repeating with Shudderwork, or any other effect that would otherwise allow you to have a battlecry go off a second time. You can only ever get one, and only one, iconic hand per game.

@andy02q

4 ай бұрын

​@@remove_the_fucking_at_signYou can get multiple iconic hands by putting one in your deck and one from Harth. *ducks

@MagicalDanny

4 ай бұрын

@@remove_the_fucking_at_sign what if you steal your opponent's and play theirs and then they steal it back, is it written into the card itself or the player? If they played it will it work or will it fizzle out since you technically used their copy of the effect once already.

@mitch5944

3 ай бұрын

It's so shudder works I think lol

Why dosen't Shudder trigger Hearth's battlecry? Apart from it would ruin the combo? Edit, battlecry is once per game, got it. :)

@burgerandy2729

4 ай бұрын

Harth’s battlecry is once per game, it’s a new limitation. It’s interesting since it’s a way to balance the card. Also it would brick the Shudderwock combo since it gives you a random iconic hand meaning you bounced 1 mana versions can be replaced by another hand.

@mica4977

4 ай бұрын

The card reads (once per game) so there are no do-overs on his battlecry

21:20 Nice missed lethal!

@freezinginjune

4 ай бұрын

how does he get 31 dmg without deaths bite?

@tarille1043

4 ай бұрын

@@freezinginjune Play Commander + Frothing + Patron Inner Rage on Patron Whirlwind Hit into 4/4 with 3/2 Patron Hit into 2/1 with 3/3 Patron Execute 3/1 Patron Hit into 1/2 with 3/3 Patron Hit into 4/1 with weapon (Dealing 1 damage to face with Honourable Kill) Hit face with 3/3 Patron, 4/1 Thaurissan, 5/1 Patron and 18/3 Frothing. Exactly 31 damage.

@namelessshadow7748

4 ай бұрын

@@freezinginjune warsong, berserker, patron, inner rage on patron, whirlwind, all face

@tarille1043

4 ай бұрын

@@namelessshadow7748 Is only 29 damage. 4 damage from Thaurissan, 5 damage from Patron, 9 damage from extra Patrons, 10 damage from Frothing and 1 damage from weapon.

@BengaIaas

4 ай бұрын

​@tarille1043 iirc you can't execute your own minion

What about whizbang?!

Should've been 10 wins D:

Can we please get this man to 100k subs finally?

EVERYONE!!! GET IN HERE!

Hellooooooo

Mark i love you but please put a ptsd warning on the video, the shudderwok jump scare almost killed me. I can still hear his jaws biting and his claws catching......

4:50 "Sure, that was like worst case scenario." No Mark, you severely misplayed your winning chances down from >90% to 66% and then you got lucky. Worst case scenario was not getting a Shudderwock copy to hand at all. Normally you don't play Saronite if you can't get a copy to hand the same turn because you want multiple Saronite procs in the Battlecry pool.

...level dimond winrate 5%

Disgusting! Just how I like it :)

First

Wowzers a non interactive infinate combo that could literally only be beaten if the opponent had a OTK combo. Yet you guys wonder why Hearthstone has been in decline for so long on all metrics. LOL!

@mitch5944

3 ай бұрын

Lol it's still too slow to be an actually good card 😭

@Al0neStillAlive

3 ай бұрын

@@mitch5944 Braindead response.

how stupid is that card? xD

always funny when streamer playing hearthstone and make videos against ,,normal,, enemies that playing ,,normal decks,, (control decks) but when u go standart or wild ranked u will meet 90% aggro decks, pirate rogue, mine rogue, totem shaman, aggro paladin, they burn you in turn 5 u cant do anything. hearthstone is done bro. there is nothing about skill anymore. unplayable 2024

@mitch5944

3 ай бұрын

Well yeah he (and every youtuber) only uploads the wins which is against bad decks/ decent matchups since Stonebrew is too slow to actually be that good lmao

Mark, I'm glad your shudderwock went in the worst order. Cuz you played terribly and you deserved it. Why would you trade grumble off the field?