It’s strange how every “main stream” review channel has only reviewed the D6 on specs and consistently bashing it, but none have actual use the camera in a shooting situation as you did. Thank you for giving it a “REAL WORLD REVIEW” instead just opening the box and sniffing it and saying it’s a disappointment...

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the support and for watching the review. Much appreciated

@AshBashSneakers

4 жыл бұрын

I see what you did there 👀

@trebronlibrando4384

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly... That's why I decided not to follow that guy anymore. He became so boring to watch, he's reviews are so predictable, that sniffing and wind tunnel test thing.

@ArsenijeRadenovic

4 жыл бұрын

Search for Steve Perry. He actually uses Nikon single digit cameras for a living. And I agree, all of these drama queen channels are just reading specs. Even this is somewhat of a real world review.

@ZaberAnsaryOfficial

4 жыл бұрын

Wow all these spec based stupid review channels and you bash Jared Polin? He does one of the best real world reviews of cameras on KZread if you ask me. Sure the sniffing and wind tunnel tests are horsing around a little but wait for his real world review. That was only an unboxing video.

Finally a fair review on the D6. This camera has been unfairly crucified by so many KZread personalities. Yes it is an incremental update, but I think it will work out for Nikon in the long run.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching. Most crucifying it are looking at spec sheets only. Pick it up and using it is a different experience. Unfortunately with most sporting events not happening right now the potential of this camera won’t be seen for sometime

@Fake_Sailor

4 жыл бұрын

Fack KZreadR they just use it like a week or so,

What a high quality and unbiased review, this channel definitely deserve way more subscribers.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks Johnny for the support

Hey Bobby, Jose from Puerto Rico. Your reviews are a refreshing man! I'm really tired of KZreadrs who already have an opinion even before testing any equipment. You're are pro and give us what you like and dislike by testing. Sure, if you had this kit for 6 months, you'd probably give us a more comprehensive review. Look what happened with the Canon R5 bashing by numerous KZreadrs who are called "experts". It seems that whoever buys an R5 is buying a Super Nova with all this heat criticism. They don't even consider if a person just wants a good stills camera that happens to shoot great but short bursts of video. Man! I'm personally eliminating all these bashers by un-subscribing. It's not even worth giving an opinion. You keep up the excellent work bro!

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks Jose. Yes many channels do this. We don’t as I don’t think it’s fair to the end user and the companies themselves that design and build the products. We need to be fair. Call out what is lacking and highlight the strengths. Yes people forget the R5 also takes fantastic photos and they just concentrate on 8K which most people prob will only use sparingly. The nature of the business I Guess.

Greetings. At last a decent review where you get to see the actual, real life thoughts and results. Taken even further with the before and after edits to the photo's, so you can really see how they came out of the camera and then the finished article, brilliant. This review has exactly what this new camera has, fantastic 'Dynamic Range'. Well done :)

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you for the kind words and for watching.

I totally agree. I don't know why this beautiful and powerful camera is getting a lot of flak. This is an amazing camera if you ask me.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Agree. I guess people want more of a hybrid camera and for the price I understand that criticism

@Mr09260

4 жыл бұрын

Just Envy thats all

@perfectbill1550

4 жыл бұрын

On paper, the specs are a little disappointing compared to what people wanted/expected in a D6 and vs. the newest Canon. I would have liked it if Nikon added better video AF to the D6 (like the did to the D780 and Z cameras). (I have 3 D5's and a D6.)

@sctm81

3 жыл бұрын

@Earl James those cameras are great but they cant replace the low light capabilities of the single digit bodies.

@TheForge10

3 жыл бұрын

Stupid people who think pro photographers need 4k video lol

I love your reviews...it's nice to see how a pro treats reviews. Real world. Thankyou.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you 🙏

@mrrocknroll84

4 жыл бұрын

@@TECH360TV you're welcome. Don't worry about the forum junkies. I understand the real world and so do others...when you shoot manual, every camera pretty much gets the job done. The reason why I switched to a Fuji xh1 from Nikon was the build quality. After the d300 and the D3...the cameras just weren't as strong. I hope that this has changed. Well the d6 should be a monster. After all, it's a single digit Nikon

Here am i, still rocking my Nikon F4. Best camera ever made. 😅

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Beautiful camera

@topperharley7142

4 жыл бұрын

@@TECH360TV I appreciate and enjoy your content. Especially the camera related stuff. I like the presentation and that you speak so clearly. Really easy to understand/follow without geeking too much into the tech stuff. Just the right amount of information. Keep it up!

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks Topper. Much appreciated

@obsidian00

4 жыл бұрын

I miss my D4S...

Finally a real and properly done review. I wish you'd show the 3D tracking which some say is beyond amazing. Other than that, great job.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks. I wanted to show that but it’s challenging to record an optical view finder.

Finally a review addressing the unnecessary need for the focusing points all the way to the edge - if you're a decent photographer, your subject should be within those 105 points. This is a high end niche product and it's being unfairly slated for that. Great review. "If a fish is judged on its ability to climb trees, it will go its entire life thinking that it is stupid"

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Love the last quote. Thanks for watching!!

@stanspb763

4 жыл бұрын

Yes, by limiting the focus points the focus data information to be evaluated in a unit of time is greatly increased. Even an entry-level camera would focus pretty quickly if a single focus point was used while using the slower processors of the day. That is another of the misunderstanding when comparing the specs with a general-purpose camera to a specialty camera. A general use camera will have a lot more focus points over a wider span of the focus sensor to suit the needs of a generalist who does not need the speed in evaluating data to track fast erratic motion.For my uses, a general-purpose camera like my D850 and Z6 are much better matches to my subjects but if I had clients who needed money shots in all conditions and lighting of fast-moving subjects I would try to keep the subject in the center and want a very fast AF processor.

@perfectbill1550

4 жыл бұрын

I would prefer focus points reaching closer to the edge of the frame, such as when you have a person filling your viewfinder, you CAN'T put the focus point on their face.

@mrtomgreeen

3 жыл бұрын

‘If you’re a decent photographer, your subject should…’ Listen to yourself.

@samcharlesart

3 жыл бұрын

@@mrtomgreeen Nothing better to do than to troll around?

Your reviews are so natural. D6 camera is for specific usage and user. For my type of shooting even Z6 is an overkill. Keep safe and let that 70-200 2.8 z lens review out plsss 🙏

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you 🙏 waiting for the go ahead from Nikon to release it

Well Done Review... thanks for showing the images before and after editing.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching

Great review, as always!

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks Kevin!

Wow! What a lens and an amazing unbiased review as well

@TECH360TV

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching

First, YOUR review is done with the camera actually in your hands! My D6 is arriving Tuesday. Thanks for the review.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Can’t do a review looking at spec sheets. Not fair to users and not fair to the engineers who worked hard to make it. Enjoy this combo!! I was sad to let them go

@merkin22

4 жыл бұрын

@@TECH360TV My bad I thought if was the 180-400 f4 (with tc) until I got to that part of your vid and realized.... Have you guys reviewed that lens? That 120-300 produced some grandly sharp shots!

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

No not yet. When there is more to shoot I will ask to take it out.

I love Bobby's honest "real world" usage review.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks

Your videos are great man, way better than mine. From one Singapore based channel to another, keep it up! Really appreciate the help this channel gave me

@btonelli

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the kind words. Singapore reviews represent 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

@ZXTech

4 жыл бұрын

@@btonelli Hey man if you ever want help with building a pc or gaming gear we could work together cause thats my specialty! Represent!

Another fantastic review. Boy, this lens and the images it produces is amazing really really good!

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you! Yes it’s a fantastic lens

@TheFykle

3 жыл бұрын

So is the insane price ! 😒

@TECH360TV

3 жыл бұрын

You pay for top quality glass

@TheFykle

3 жыл бұрын

@@TECH360TV i know its top grade, but gees its still not long enough on a FF, and is there really 11k worth of a diff over the sigma, im doubting it big time, could prob adjust the differences in PS or LR for most part.

My cousin is an NPS professional that can't wait to get his hands on this camera for the transmission abilities that you discussed. Me, I'm perfectly happy with my D780.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Yes the transmission capabilities will help many that need it. Thanks for watching.

Hi I am totally agree with you I have same outfit Nikon D6 & Nikon 120-300mm F/2.8 VR SR Lens love it this machine do really great job autofocus system is really great also dynamic is really good 👍

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thank for watching and congrats on the camera and lens. They are fantastic

Hey kid. As a retired pro ADV shooter. BIg in the film days. Gone Digital these days...Your reviews are spot on..with no BULL SHIET...TY. So tired of these reviews that never tell you anything like fake news. Yours are great TY!

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you sir. Appreciate the kind words especially coming from a professional

Again thanks for your honest review. There's literally only 3 English reviews of the D6 and the 1DxIII that speak on truths vs click bait and comment fodder.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching

Quick question when you shoot high iso are you using 14bit or 12bit raw? The D6 has about 12 stops of DNR probably 11.9 or 12.0 (it's less than the D5). General rule of thumb, anything below 12ev should be shot in 12bit; anything above 12ev shoot in 14bit.

Love your reviews

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

Can I ask, 3:08 why are you adding a wireless transmitter when I thought it had Wi-fi inbuilt? What have I missed?

Interesting review me my self got a d3s almost 5 year ago and i love it very much not sure the auto focus how does it compare to modern camera

A really good review. The one thing that I wish reviewers would do is do more sports shooting such as soccer under evening stadium lights. It is a really tough shooting situation and for sports shooters it is really the litmus test of both lens and camera.

To paraphrase.... The death of Nikon and of DSLR have been greatly exaggerated. I love to get my hand on that 120-300mm lens. I can tell the quality and the craftsmanship that went into the making of it. Great review. Thank you.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

I agree Nikon and DSLR’s have some legs for sure. The lens is a must try

Just wow 😳 WOW 😳 awesome My next camera 📷

While you had the D6 were you able to test HDMI signal out?

As much as this camera has been panned in initial “spec reviews”, what is interesting is that as sports, action and wildlife photographers start using it (its real target) and hands-on reviews come in, people are saying it’s remarkably capable. As a wildlife photographer who is constantly struggling with light, shutter speed, exposure and higher ISOs I’m scratching my head and asking, “might this be the best tool yet for me?”. Love my D500 and D850 but am wondering if this will find its way into my bag? Thanks for a useful and well balanced review. Nicely done.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the kind words. Yes it’s a very capable camera and one that you need to use to appreciate. The spec wars don’t count for real world usage. Yes the video features are lacking. Something Nikon as a whole needs to improve. While this camera is designed for the Sports and wildlife Photographers, people do want to shoot video more and for the price tag it’s a challenge for Nikon to say “buy this camera vs the competition”. However if your work is strictly photography and you already are invested in the Nikon family this is a worthy camera to look at.

@perfectbill1550

4 жыл бұрын

D5 and D6 AF are better than on the D500 and D850. I don't often use either of my D850's.

@marcusslade9804

4 жыл бұрын

@@perfectbill1550 Well, a good friend just got a D6 so I'll likely have the opportunity to test it for myself but I don't doubt your comments on the AF capability. Must say, I use both my bodies pretty evenly.

I bought the camera. I'm mainly wildlife. So far I love the camera. I have a D500 and a D850. Both great cameras but the focusing system doesnt even compare to the D6. Thanks for the reasonable video. I agree with you on the focusing points on the camera not going to the edge. The D500 has more edge to edge coverage (DX). When I hit images with moving animals toward the edge, my images generally are trashed because I dont get wing tips. Best to not have them as far as I'm concerned. My hit rate with this camera is off the charts better than the D500 and D850. Wow.... I find myself having to pick my favorite in focus images vs picking the ones in focus. Its a great step up. Is it worth it? It is to me. If I decide to get into video I'll buy a Z6.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching. Yes I think this real world usage of AF points needs to be addressed more. It’s easy to criticise a spec sheet, but when one uses the camera you see how good it is for what it’s designed for.

Thanks for the review. I know the photography market is shrinking for camera makers and for photographers (amateurs, pros) making a living out of photography, but I am happy to see photographers who are still enjoying photography like yourself... All the online videos about gears, and criticizing camera makers, cameras for no reason are killing interest in photography, or are making photography boring... The #NikonD6 is for a niche of pros, people should stop criticizing devices they will never use... People need to re-start enjoying photography to help the industry... I enjoy being out with my EOS200D/SL2/KissX9 or my EOS90D and take photographs... Even with my past SX530HS (1/2.3") I used to be out, and enjoy photography. Photographers now vloggers or youtubers, panicking because the maket is shrinking, are actually killing even more the industry with their reviews. Good luck and keep enjoying photography.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and you make some valid points here. I also feel many channels are pushing away buyers because all they do is focus on video, however some people don’t have the time Nor the skills to edit video and this may become reluctant to purchase a new camera

The pics from the football field are really beautiful.

@TECH360TV

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you 🙏

Great review

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching

@NikCan66

4 жыл бұрын

Only review of the Nikon D6 and 120-300mm f2.8 lens I had seen.

Great review and could it be possible to compare the wireless Nikon WT6 used in a action sports wildlife setting

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Perhaps in the future. I had very limited time with the camera and in SG not much wildlife except the zoo

@NikCan66

4 жыл бұрын

@@TECH360TV thats fair enough

Hello Bobby from Russia, great video and camera!

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Hi Rafael! Thanks!

my dream camera

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Know the feeling 😊

@ananmananpage

4 жыл бұрын

:)

Hi. What camera And Lenes used For taking this video. IT looks so nice.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Canon EOS R with RF 24-05

I enjoyed the review, and agree, spec lists have little to do with actual use and resulting images. But the people reviewing it usually have nothing to compare other than specs because few are any are professional photographers, and being gear fans more than image fans, feature lists rule all. This camera is not for me. Not because of its cost or weight but solely because it answers all the questions I am not asking: I do not shoot wildlife professionally, nor sports. My field is portraiture, studio product/fashion, theater/ballet, events, and architecture. But I as an engineer by temperament and education, I can certainly appreciate the applied engineering involved. My cameras used most are a Z6 and D850, and will probably add the Z7s when it is released. For me, the handling and ergonomics trump all, and the Z bodies are a joy to use. The D850 only comes off the shelf when an art director insists on large files. For uses and sensibilities, the only brand that has stayed true to appealing to how cameras are used is Nikon and explains why, from model and class to class, they all share the superior control placement and handling. Build quality is unmatched in the field. Your review seems genuine and reasonable, no-hype from brand sponsorship or affiliate link commissions. I will likely rent a D6 and long glass when they become available just to spend a weekend learning it. For my subjects, the Z6 is suitable for an everyday workhorse camera with the stunning S glass. I have more interest in lenses than bodies, however, and I am waiting for work to pick back up since we have not fully been released from lockdown, which for me started March 14th. But when work picks back up I will be saving for the 58 f/0.95. I rented one for 2 days, it is not cheap to rent, but see why people are going nuts about it after shooting seriously. It will be a limited production lens and probably appreciate in value. Thanks for the very welcome reviews and great production values in the video, you have an easy manner in front of a camera.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the comments. I’m a fan of the Z7 personally and look forward to Nikon’s next mirrorless cameras. The SLenses are fantastic too! As for the 58 I also did a review on that. Love that lens. The colors, sharpened and bokeh that it produces are mouth watering

The specs race gets really tiresome from all the other KZreadr’s channels. I think this camera, in competent hands, will get the job done right. Great review!

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Agree. Thanks for watching

Which camera are u shooting for your utub video...?

@TECH360TV

3 жыл бұрын

Canon EOS R

Would be cool to see a comparison between the Nikon 120-300mm 2.8 and the sigma S version

@TECH360TV

3 жыл бұрын

Perhaps in the future :)

😀🙏 THE BEST EVER.

I think that having autofocus reaching the edge has some merit. It’s not for composing for something at the edge (as you said, kind of a ridiculous place to put a subject), but rather for the AF system to not lose a subject it’s tracking as easily if it moves out of the center.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Perhaps but when I’m panning and tracking I’m pre-composing the shot so I don’t worry about the edges.

@stanspb763

4 жыл бұрын

And slow down the tracking by having is process all those additional focus points? Then it would be a more general-purpose camera and less suited to getting extremes of performance needed for pro sports and wildlife. Many would prefer a single focal point in the center so speed would be at its peak.

I love Nikon D850 & D6

Im ordering mine today

@TECH360TV

3 жыл бұрын

Congrats

Oh my god I want that lens.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Me too 😊

@TheFykle

3 жыл бұрын

For $15k Au 😳 I know where they can fair shove it .. absolute rort of a price’ and still too short for my sports

still rocking my d2x and D3 with my super fast 300 2.8,need new batteries now

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Fantastic lens and still great cameras

Which camera is used to shoot this video ? Plz share

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Canon EOS R with 24-105 RF lens

How does the 120-300 stack up for performances.... Dance performances and the like?

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

It’s a fast focusing lens so I’m sure it will perform very well. Especially for lower light situations

@perfectbill1550

4 жыл бұрын

Brad Hill has tested this lens very extensively and says it is exceptional: better than the 300 2.8 VR II !! www.naturalart.ca/voice/blog.html (scroll down the page)

You can skip weight lifting on gym with that combo bro..

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Definitely haha

@daviddowling9830

4 жыл бұрын

Too heavy for you snowflake

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

No cupcake it’s fine.

I love that lens, buuuuut 10 grand :O

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Understand. It’s a big chunk of change

@amazingmomentsphotography5242

4 жыл бұрын

@@TECH360TV It sure is, but one day i will buy it thats for sure :D

That lens 😍, I'm just have 50mm 1.8 & 18-140mm 😅

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Also good lenses 👍🏼👍🏼

Still none of the big channels or 90% of the other camera channels still have yet to review the D6 legitimately. Wanted to also leave this little old nugget. For video, regarding slow motion B-roll, using optical flow with speed warp in Davinci easily negates 4K 60p imo. Premiere has a tool too. People always leave out how shooting 60p or 120p and its difficulty to sync audio which can be near impossible in some cases. Now as for RAW output I think Nikon would allow RAW via a Atomos Ninja however if the buyers aren't asking chances are they won't do the same upgrade as the Z6/Z7. I had to think the other day, why all of Nikon cameras stop at 4K 30p? Only the Z7 II shoots 4K 60p natively. The Z6 II will get a upgrade and using the Atomos Ninja on the Z6/Z7 it's possible. I'm wondering like who needs 4K 60p and for what reason? 4K absolutely understandable for cropping/reframing/VFX. But for 60p unless the timeline is 60p I don't see the point of sacrificing footage just for slow motion when software can do slow motion just as clean as 4K 60p with a 4K 30p file, even upresing 1080p is nearly unoticible currently. I mean its not Arri 2k to 4k but it's not 720 to 4k either. As for RAW video, I mean I guess someone needs that while shooting sports or maybe they want it for a different type of job. But for sports I don't see the point of RAW video on this or the 1DxIII. I guess it's a nice to have, it's just much cheaper better cameras than the 1DxIII and D6 that shoot RAW. If someone wants better low iso dynamic range and a lot of features the 1DXIII is the better camera. If someone wants better low light performance and workflow the D6 is the better camera. Otherwise they're pretty much equals at least from what I've seen/read.

use crop mode on 70-200. this for budget friendly people.

A comment for supporting the algorithm

@TECH360TV

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks. The new Alogrithm is all over the place

Die D6 ist der Hammer habe sie einer Nikon z9 vorgezogen und es nicht bereut benutze Sie mit einem Nikon 14-24 2.8G Nikon, 24-120 4.0 VR, Nikon 60 mm 2 8G, Nikon 85 mm 1 4G, Nikon 70-200 2.8G VR II alles Top Optiken an der D6.

I don't care about the D6, but the 120-300 is a really beautiful lens.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Understand. The lens is beautiful

I’m searching a sport review where are showned new LAN thethering and wirless transfer capabilities :((((

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

A bit challenging right now due to the world situation

Just dreaming to hold :( but damm.. Nice review..

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you 🙏

I just got myself a second hand D5. Love the image and low light performance. But one thing I have to say the highlight dynamic range is terrible compared to my other Nikon cameras. Wanna to see if D6 fixed this problem

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

D6 is decent. Is it class leading no but with the zoo pics I was able to rescue a good amount of details from the shadows

@stanspb763

4 жыл бұрын

It is not a problem to fix. It is a choice that sports photographers take. Below 800ISO a D850 is almost 2.5 stops more DR but above that the D6 is clearly better. At 6400 ISO the D850 applies scaling through the rest of its range while the D6 is in native analog DR to 102,000 ISO and does not Apply scaling until over 409,000 ISO. That ability to return printable images to the photo editor in the worst of lighting conditions is something that makes the difference between a successful image and a wasted assignment. A side note, the little Z6 stays in lockstep with the D5/6 right up to 102,000 ISO after which to 204,000 is its limit. Different goals met by different cameras. For its intended audience, each is better suited than the other. I have both a D850 and Z6 and the little Z6 is better at very high ISO or very low light than the D850 but for widest DR, below 80 ISO not much can beat a D850 except MF cameras. Note also that the competition such as Sony a92 resorts to crushing raw noise reduction at 512k and up so its sensor is not up to the performance of a D5 or 6. None of the dedicated sports/action cameras have optimized DR at low ISO

@perfectbill1550

4 жыл бұрын

Nope. D5 and D6 have EXACTLY the same DR. And the D5 only has lower DR than other Nikon cameras at LOW ISO. The D850 has 2 1/2 stops better DR as Stan notes - at ISO 100 - but the D5 beats the D850 for DR at ISO above 2,500

@perfectbill1550

4 жыл бұрын

See this to see what I mean: www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm

In the case of spec sheet reviewers. The 1DXIII can't shoot beyond 12fps before it starts spewing oil all over the sensor. None of the big reviewers have spoken up about it any of the massive problems with that camera. Freezes and goes to sleep while shooting. Dude you don't have to apologize for others ignorance when the other camera can't even deliver on its own specs. Even the 1000x buffer, no body but a remote shooter is doing that and by doing so it will destroy the camera from all the oil spilling on the sensor.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Fair points. Yes I review based on first hand experience and leave the spec sheets to other reviewers 😊

Sure it must be a phenomenal lens, it costs almost $ 10,000! For which client do you make your evaluation? Mortals on foot cannot afford that lens or the camera that surprises you so much.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Well In this reviews I’m dealing with a 6k pro camera and a lens meant for professional Photographers that need the focal length and performance. As I said I the review can rent and borrow and if can afford then buy.

@oscarfernandezchuyn1208

4 жыл бұрын

@@TECH360TV I don't think renting is affordable for Nikon lovers. Professionals don't think they need a lot of arguments to convince them, but if you think you need to remind them how to spend their money, it seems perfect to me.

Good

How much total price camara &lence

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

In Singapore dollars around 23k

Photographers only camera is a great idea. It is easy (and cheap) to carry a Z6 as a video backup. But AF points being cramped in the middle - there is no excuse for it. They could do it on D500, so it should be possible to do it on a D6 line.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Agree on the Z6 option but as for AF, I wouldn’t compare the quality of autofocus of the D6 to the D500. This system is extremely accurate and with the focusing points close together, you are more inclined to get that “money” shot.

@TheVitalishe

4 жыл бұрын

@@TECH360TV thank you for the reply. But my comment about D500 was about the possibility of placing AF points on DSLR all the way to the edge. It is extremely useful both for portraits and action.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Yes it’s possible, I think Nikon wanted to give more precision to the AF I’m the sweet spot of the sensor where most photos are taken

8:16 asking myself too, why.

💯

Me want Nikkor 120-300mm f/2.8, but me also want D6.

Focus point to the end of the sensor help with composition greatly. @bobbyfingers

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

So you photograph subjects at the far edge of the frame?

@perfectbill1550

4 жыл бұрын

@@TECH360TV How about when you are photographing a person that fills your viewfinder? Wouldn't it be nice if focus points went to the top of the viewfinder so you could put a focus point on the face of your subject?

I use a D4. I find the images amazin for a 2012 camera.

@TECH360TV

3 жыл бұрын

Great camera

@j.m.gratton6000

3 жыл бұрын

Same here, my last client was so impressed with the images I submitted. I plan on keeping it in my kit for many more years. Cheers!

@tyrsog

Жыл бұрын

I just picked one up. Love it! I do see D6's going for $3500 now used. Hard not to grab one for the AF improvements. I'm sort of partial the the 16mp sensor though and the AF on the D4 is no slouch anyways.

Wait you guys are in Singapore?

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Yep! Here in SG

@jonathanseah2204

4 жыл бұрын

@@TECH360TV omg I've been a huge fan of you guys and I'm living in Singapore HAHA

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Haha small world! Will have to meet up sometime

I tried 1dx mark iii and I forgot the REST !!

You mean the D5S?

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Wish there were more upgrades to it but using it I was impressed with the updates it got

@obsidian00

4 жыл бұрын

Indeed

Those Jordan 1s though.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Always love a good pair of AJ1’s

A lot of guys seem to overlook the new AF (with Eye-AF through the view finder). Video features are pretty worthless in that type of camera anyway.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Actually The Eye AF isn’t always showing up, but face detection is very good.

Amazing if you are lucky enough to own one/ access

❤️🥇💋

People talking about "every other channel talks about the specs" but how much different is it from the d5? Not much obviously

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Incremental upgrades but for the changes like better connectivity, photo filtering and better AF will be welcomed by some.

@justanotherguycommenting5754

4 жыл бұрын

@@TECH360TV still there will be a considerable price difference between both

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Now yes so it’s all dependent on your needs. If the D5 is sufficient then go for that. If you need the better AF, connectivity and 4K video even if it’s quite limited then D6

Considering the pictures you took with the D6 the D850 would have a much better job.

People expected more from the D6 because Canon’s 1dx mk 3 smoked their mk2. It’s amazing.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Perhaps. Also rumors set expectations that just weren’t realistic

@geomox4

4 жыл бұрын

@@TECH360TV but Canon made them realistic. I'm just going to wait for Nikon's pro mirrorless to come around with my fingers crossed

@obsidian00

4 жыл бұрын

I was one of those that expected a bit more from the D6...I waited until they were both out in the wild before deciding on which one to upgrade to...for the money, the 1DX3 was the better buy so...

Nice Camera but I'll stick with my D800 it does what I want with great results

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

D800 produces great images

It's a pro action photography camera. If you're not that then it's not for YOU

1dx mk 3 or D6 which one you consider better?

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

For Photography they are very close. If you need more video then the Canon.

@stanspb763

4 жыл бұрын

As a general purpose camera the Canon has better low ISO DR but less at high ISO so is less of a sports wildlife camera than the Nikon. The Nikon is really optimized for a niche market. The Canon resorts to detail loss at high ISO by turning on nondefeatable RAW noise reduction so there is less recoverable detail. Basically a 1DX3 can compete somewhat with a two camera Nikon shooter(D850 and D5/6) in a single camera unless the going get tough than the D850 is clearly better at low ISO and the D5/6 is clearly better at high ISO. All 3 are good cameras with good support backing them up, which is why at major sporting events, all you will see are Nikons and Canons. Same with photo journalism, like the international photo journalism awards are dominated by those two, but the last few years Nikon cameras produced over 50% of the total award wining photos, 52% in 2018 to 34% shot with Canon and the rest various. Sony took 2% Pentax and Apple had more than Sony. but if you go by the paid KZread gurus, who usually are not professional photographers, one would think there is only one brand, the one that pays the most for promotion to photo channels. Nikon is a pretty old fashion conservative company and does not pay influencers to hype their products.

@EduardoMurillo

4 жыл бұрын

@@stanspb763 🙌 Good detailed reply.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Great reply. To add to your last point, this is an area where Nikon needs to improve. Yes I understand the market they are trying to attract but a company needs to earn money to survive. Sony was very good at the marketing aspect especially with KZread channels and influencers. Canon is also doing this much more now which is helping them. Nikon as conservative of a company as they are, need to try a different marketing approach. When I see Nikon I see sports and wildlife. I don’t think Lifestyle. While that works with professionals, for the average user they won’t feel they can use a Nikon without a certain set of skills. Perhaps this can be improved in the upcoming mirrorless cameras

Ak photography studio at Abk

Last thing last thing. I wonder about Nikon. Lens rentals, etc. type companies buy these lenses. The .95 Noct Z lens, 120-300 like I'm wondering if the high cost has more to do with the lens rental companies and agencies b/c Nikon or any other manufacturer can benefit from some entity who day one is going to buy 5 to 10 lenses if not more. At $13k a pop that's like $130k at pre-order. I know Getty buys camera gear from Canon which is partly why Canon has such a tight grip on sports action photography. They buy over 100 pro bodies and lenses (mostly for robo shooting). That's at least $650k before taxes and that's body only. Getty is probably spending at least $1.5mil to $2mil with Canon. I don't think we're keeping these guys doors open as general consumers it's gotta be these large photo groups/agencies around the world who provide gear to photographers and remote shooters.

4:14 it's dlsr so it's nearly technically impossible for focus points to be om the edge, people with such an opinion are lacking basic technical knowledge

@TECH360TV

3 жыл бұрын

Yes but there are many different types of buyers and understanding thus why we point out certain aspects of the camera

awesome lens but betwern that and the 180-400 f4 tc e ,, both £10,000 lenses ..id go for the 180-400 . being a wildlife buff ,, 2 £10,000 lenses and a d6 might just get me castrated , and some masty other stuff

@TECH360TV

3 жыл бұрын

Hahaha I hear yes. 180-400 prob more ideal for wildlife. However a teleconverter on the 120-300 is an option too

@tomhughes5123

3 жыл бұрын

@@TECH360TV for 10 000 being built in is good .. this lens is having its very own d850 .. no dust or crud in the mirror box .. the 120-300 is an awesome lens , im not big on adding converters .its clearer and faster to crop in digitally for me

Heloise

The issue is with the you Tuber who built up expectations from a new camera and if it not fulfilled, they screams. Few names like Matt Granger, Froknowsphoto etc. They're not sports action photographer. Still they reviewing this. Alas, so much for expert and social media.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Understand. There are various different opinions out there. I decided to not care about the spec sheet and photograph with the camera and decide myself. While I’m not a professional sports photographer I appreciate what they do and try to understand their needs before reviewing a camera like this

Why use at other than 2.8 ? Coz you want to cover more of the subject than just head..like for tiger

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Understand 😊 what I was saying in a joking way was you are paying this much for 2.8 so use it but of course stopping down has its advantages and necessity

I kind of feel bad for the people that bought this camera given the mirrorless systems we have only 3 years later... kind of because I wish I have that amount of money to spend, haha

haha i tend not to go over 200 iso my perfect £10.000 lens would be 180-400 f4 e , for the price and being a wildlife guy . 300 just doesnt cut the mustard . but great vid

@TECH360TV

3 жыл бұрын

Understand. Thanks for watching

Not seeing a single frame that I couldn't have made with my Nikkor 300 2.8 IF-ED AIS.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

True but what you get is a zoom at 2.8 so instead of carrying two lenses you only need to carry one.

@gregoryrogalsky6937

4 жыл бұрын

@@TECH360TV No denying that zooms have there place. I personally own/use/carry the Nikkor 80-200 2.8 ED AIS shooting street and it's big/heavy but a pleasure to use. My point is there isn't a single image in this review that I couldn't have nailed with any of my manual focus Nikkor's. Especially if your using focusing peaking like I have on my Sony A7rii. Look you guys think you need AF .. not going to try to convince you different. I think this Nikkor 120-300 2.8 lens is long over due for Nikon. The fact that it cost 14 grand in Canadian funds so I wont be getting on any time soon. I wish Nikon much success on people buying this lens.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

It’s a specialty lens for sure. Yes one with ample skills can do wonders with manual focus. Not denying that at all. Just showing the potential of the camera and lens

@gregoryrogalsky6937

4 жыл бұрын

@@TECH360TV It was good review.. The things is for me .. I never see lens like this reviewed on the street with people walking in front of you and obstuctions making the the AF getting lost. Saying that , Iv said for years that AF sucks , but now with eye focus . I have to admit that it has it's place.

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks. Yes understand what you mean. This setup would be very intimidating if I was doing street photography haha but I get your point.

90% of the folks who bash this camera will never buy it even if it satisfied their 'expectations'. Simply because it's overkill for what they do and they can't afford it anyway. 😂

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Haha perhaps :)

2yrs later and no one talks about the 1Dx III or D6 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@tyrsog

Жыл бұрын

Great!!! Cheap(really cheap) F mount Pro gear!!! Thanks Z mount adopters!!!

@dct124

Жыл бұрын

@@tyrsog The D6 can now be had for $3k on the used market. A 50% price drop for a top 5 camera.

@tyrsog

Жыл бұрын

@@dct124 yep that’s what I’m seeing. Highly considering one but I enjoy the D4 so much 🤔

@monetarnie3841

10 ай бұрын

Pros are talking about the D6 and the 1dx mkIII. Do You expect amateurs to talk about $5000 cameras that they will never buy? Amateurs talk about mirrorless like Sony a7III or Fuji cameras

@dct124

10 ай бұрын

@@monetarnie3841 pro don't talk about much, especially not publicly. It's always the amateurs that talk in a manner of wishful thinking. 90% of camera channels are amateurs reviewing these cameras as a supplemental revenue stream via YT. It was the end of an era. In prior year's price didn't stop anyone from pro bodies. What happened was the technology reached a plateau where even a base model camera is as good and feature dense as a pro body. These last few pro bodies reached their end by remaining big, bulky, heavy, and lacked video controls that lesser cameras offer. The D6 and 1DX III were LOSS LEADERS for marketing.

There isn't any videos shot from the D6 on KZread. None. I'd like to see it video's live as you are given commentary indoors. Records. I'd like to hear the voice qualify. And let me judge for myself. Nikon says 4k video. I'm going to sell products on KZread. I want the camera videoing me live sometimes. Be the first. I NEED A ONE CAMERA DOES IT ALL. Sports wildlife indoor KZread live videos and recording. Hope you read this it's important to me. Thanks you.

I don't see any major advantages of D6 over 1dx 3, but it's crippled with video feature. It should be priced at 3000-4000USD, it's way overpriced

@TECH360TV

4 жыл бұрын

Yes I do agree pricing should be more reasonable.

@stanspb763

4 жыл бұрын

If someone wants a more generalist camera the 1Dx3 was designed for that but for the extremes like low light and pro-level connectivity for getting files in front of photo editors as they are shot, the D5/6 is the choice. Like the Sony a92, the 1Dx3 resorts to detail losing RAW noise reduction at high ISO, which can not be turned off. The D6 is far more focused on the needs of a smaller group of professional sports and wildlife shooters. For general photography, Nikon has the D850 which excels in image quality at maximum DR and low ISO. So they are all good, but Nikon concentrates on the needs of specific segments of their user's applications. The difference in connectivity alone gives an edge to Nikon with industry-leading remote file transfer. I use their WT-7 RF module that sends files at 1gigabit per second to a computer or access point up to 660 ft away while shooting so a slide show can be started on large screens of conventions, events and weddings within seconds of the first shot taken. The price for such a limited production specialty item is not going to be the same as a mass-produced item. $6-7k is perfectly reasonable for such an optimized low production unit. Not everyone needs it, a Z6/7 or D850 are much more general cameras at larger volume prices. If you do not see the advantages that is ok, it was not intended for you then.

3 MILLION ISO? Wtf