Hall Effect

• Hall Effect
00:00 Hall effect: Explanation
02:19 Derivation of the Hall voltage / coefficient
More: en.fufaev.org/hall-effect

Пікірлер: 79

  • @fufaev-alexander
    @fufaev-alexander2 жыл бұрын

    eBook: en.fufaev.org/physics-equations-book Paperback: tinyurl.com/physics-paperback Hardcover: tinyurl.com/physics-hardcover

  • @louisehelgesson5471
    @louisehelgesson54715 ай бұрын

    Thanks, my teacher could absolutely not explain this in a way that made sense

  • @TaskForge

    @TaskForge

    24 күн бұрын

    Oh hi Louise

  • @nicolascruzmedina8466
    @nicolascruzmedina84667 ай бұрын

    best video I have seen so far about Hall Effect. Thank you very much.

  • @dorukkzloglu
    @dorukkzloglu7 ай бұрын

    Thank you very much for this brilliant video.

  • @user-jr3bm1pn1r
    @user-jr3bm1pn1r Жыл бұрын

    This is fantastic! I especially like the way you describe the substitutions in the formulae. I don't have to pause the video to search out why the variables in the formula suddenly changed. Allowing me to stay focused on the subject. No one else does this! Thank you.

  • @Bari_Khan_CEng_CMarEng
    @Bari_Khan_CEng_CMarEng9 ай бұрын

    Lovely explanation, much appreciated. Great series.

  • @watiblygrana
    @watiblygrana7 ай бұрын

    perfect video thank you

  • @EliMemmedov-tu8uy
    @EliMemmedov-tu8uyАй бұрын

    It`s so useful, Thank you

  • @linabouaamri4924
    @linabouaamri49242 ай бұрын

    Thanks for this amazing video I thought that I would never understand it

  • @aronkloepping6776
    @aronkloepping6776 Жыл бұрын

    what a great explanation. Thank you very much!!

  • @vadimarhip3222
    @vadimarhip32223 ай бұрын

    Very good video👍

  • @abcdloveu
    @abcdloveu8 ай бұрын

    perfect

  • @leonardosoto5669
    @leonardosoto56693 ай бұрын

    What if our charge carriers are positive charges?

  • @Animobsessed
    @Animobsessed3 ай бұрын

    Interesting

  • @arthiitb
    @arthiitb Жыл бұрын

    Thank you for making this video. ❤️✌️

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    Жыл бұрын

    You're welcome, Mendhe! You can also check out my physics website: en.universaldenker.org

  • @Pearl-ku6sz
    @Pearl-ku6sz Жыл бұрын

    I don't usually comment, but the explanation in this video deserves on oscar!

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    Жыл бұрын

    thank you!! 🤩

  • @ufukcansimsek2959
    @ufukcansimsek29592 жыл бұрын

    Very simple and nice video, ty

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for your comment!

  • @suddhasattasaha4793

    @suddhasattasaha4793

    Жыл бұрын

    I explained it in a much better and simpler way. kzread.info/dash/bejne/dqh93MGBcaa5gKw.html

  • @petrmasek4506
    @petrmasek4506 Жыл бұрын

    Great, thank you

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    Жыл бұрын

    You're welcome, Petr :) Check out my physics website: en.universaldenker.org

  • @andy_lamax
    @andy_lamax Жыл бұрын

    Very very superb explanation

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    Жыл бұрын

    Thank you very much!

  • @omarsamy9114
    @omarsamy9114Ай бұрын

    How can you know the magnitude of magneticfield

  • @ferdsoroushian7471
    @ferdsoroushian74712 жыл бұрын

    very good, thanks

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you! Feel free to join the polls I'm doing in the community tab. There you can vote for the next video topic: kzread.infocommunity If you like my channel and like my videos, I would be happy about a small donation: tinyurl.com/denker-donate Top supporter appear in the Hall of Fame: universaldenker.org/supporter

  • @samuelvaldezgil
    @samuelvaldezgil Жыл бұрын

    Great explanation and really helpful.

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    Жыл бұрын

    Hey Samluel! Thank you for your comment!

  • @siddarthkushwaha9745
    @siddarthkushwaha9745 Жыл бұрын

    Best explanation sir

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    Жыл бұрын

    Thank you very much, Siddarth ☺

  • @high4702
    @high4702 Жыл бұрын

    Constructive explanation

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    Жыл бұрын

    Thank you, r'! #### Want more videos? #### As a channel member you have many cool benefits: ✅ Unlock ALL Physics Videos ✅ Channel Badges For Your Nickname ✅ Unique Channel Emojis ✅ Your Vote Counts 10x in Polls ✅ Immortalization in the Hall of Fame ✅ And that's not all! CLICK -> kzread.infojoin

  • @equipafaradayesgo
    @equipafaradayesgo Жыл бұрын

    3:40 How can we siubstitute v by (L/t) even though that the electrons do not have an uniform motion?

  • @sumedhjouras2887

    @sumedhjouras2887

    11 ай бұрын

    It's in the case of equilibrium

  • @chirantanganguly

    @chirantanganguly

    8 ай бұрын

    its a gross statistical "average"

  • @hanz4850

    @hanz4850

    7 ай бұрын

    they are not accelerating since vertical forces are at equilibrium and electrons in a current aren't accelerating

  • @emmapasqule2432
    @emmapasqule2432 Жыл бұрын

    This is brilliant. Thank you SO much. You explain things so clearly and the graphics are super helpful. Thank you, this is so appreciated.

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    Жыл бұрын

    Thanks for the motivating feedback! Greetings from Germany

  • @high4702
    @high4702 Жыл бұрын

    In your video about Maxwell equations you said that only MOVING charges create magnetic field. So, in permanent magnet should be permanent current, that creates this magnetic field???

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    Жыл бұрын

    Nope, the spin of the electrons creates the permanent magnet

  • @Claire-tk4do
    @Claire-tk4do Жыл бұрын

    Well done

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    Жыл бұрын

    thanks!

  • @casperyu3562
    @casperyu35622 ай бұрын

    Current is not equal to electrons current?

  • @Hallucinates05

    @Hallucinates05

    Ай бұрын

    Opposite

  • @DR.DRE77
    @DR.DRE77 Жыл бұрын

    Oscar needs you

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    Жыл бұрын

    🤩😍

  • @dadyex4210
    @dadyex4210 Жыл бұрын

    is F= Qv x B since it is cross product why is the left hand rule used and not right hand

  • @ikitashou1490

    @ikitashou1490

    Жыл бұрын

    @@loainakhly how ?, it's a negative charge so the magnetic force is reversed. just put your fingers into the screen with a thumb to the left of your right hand. The applying force opposes your palm direction

  • @loainakhly

    @loainakhly

    Жыл бұрын

    @@ikitashou1490 you are right I didn’t notice the negative charge, deleted my earlier comment.

  • @bhavani1089shankar
    @bhavani1089shankar Жыл бұрын

    Ammeter in Parallel to measure current , how can that be possible , we use Voltmeter in Parallel and Ammeter in series to measure Voltage and Current respectively

  • @sigma7208

    @sigma7208

    8 ай бұрын

    same question

  • @angelaguilar497
    @angelaguilar4973 ай бұрын

    I'm confused about the direction of the Lorentz force. If my left middle finger goes from left to right and my left index finger does toward the screen, my thumb points downward, not upward. The open right hand rule backs this up: if my thumb (current) goes from left to right and my fingers (magnetic field) go toward the screen, my palm (force) also points downward.

  • @benatkinson3160

    @benatkinson3160

    2 ай бұрын

    index finger = magnetic field, thumb = force, middle finger = current (direction of positive charge flow). each of those three quantities are vectors whose direction is the direction your finger points in :) if the question talks about negative charge moving left then you must make sure to point your middle finger to the right

  • @barborahalova3514
    @barborahalova3514 Жыл бұрын

    literally saved me

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    Жыл бұрын

    Nice! ☺

  • @wubwub616
    @wubwub6162 жыл бұрын

    i got lost when you brought in the small n

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    2 жыл бұрын

    oopsi, ask me a question if you have one or rewind the video^^

  • @wubwub616

    @wubwub616

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@fufaev-alexander is the n always a constant depending on the metal?

  • @wubwub616

    @wubwub616

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@fufaev-alexander I'll take that as a yes

  • @xepho8205

    @xepho8205

    Жыл бұрын

    @@wubwub616 No. It depends on the material but it's not a constant, it also depends on the detail. In a semiconductor doping the material will change the carrier density, carrier density might also depend on the temperature etc.

  • @uzair5001
    @uzair5001 Жыл бұрын

    this melted by brain

  • @uzair5001

    @uzair5001

    Жыл бұрын

    @UCjSaw-zz3wqrY6sxvm3qMQQ samaghta kea he tu apne ap ko

  • @NotElayn

    @NotElayn

    Жыл бұрын

    @@uzair5001 tera baap

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    Жыл бұрын

    too hard or too good?

  • @lambda5949
    @lambda5949 Жыл бұрын

    man used left hand rule instead of right 💀

  • @fufaev-alexander

    @fufaev-alexander

    Жыл бұрын

    haha. In German it's easier: there you can't make the mistake because it's called "three-finger rule" and not "Right-hand rule"

  • @gonzalogutierrez6048

    @gonzalogutierrez6048

    Жыл бұрын

    For an electron, you can use your left hand. for a proton you use your right hand

  • @MrBej

    @MrBej

    Жыл бұрын

    wait I don't get it, shouldn't we be using the LHR to find the motor effect on the electron placed in a B field?

  • @iamnotalive1155

    @iamnotalive1155

    Жыл бұрын

    No you use the LHR for the force on a positive charge, and use right for electron but honestly just use the LHR for all of them and when encounter an ele just pretend the current is going the opposite directing while assuming it acts like a proton

  • @MrBej

    @MrBej

    Жыл бұрын

    @@iamnotalive1155 yeah exactly, that's what I thought. Thanks for clearing it up. I've been told to use the RHR only when finding the direction of the induced current.

  • @stephenhall3515
    @stephenhall3515 Жыл бұрын

    Actually not a good explanation without context and reference to common applications. This is the abiding 'disease' of so-called 'pure' mathematics and its practitioners and explains why so few invent anything. Only when they cross over to the applied field does this occur. Edwin Hall, like his near contemporary Ernest Rutherford, always sought actual uses for phenomena they discovered and frequently made their discoveries in the process of working with things on benches and not chalk on blackboards.

  • @suddhasattasaha4793

    @suddhasattasaha4793

    Жыл бұрын

    I explained it in a much better and simpler way. kzread.info/dash/bejne/dqh93MGBcaa5gKw.html