I have always liked the afrika corp logo stencil. It's so cool looking.

@paullyon-vv9tb

Ай бұрын

What logo do you mean the white flag 😂

It was the second time I saw this wonderful documentary shared by an excellent ( the war channel)

At this point in the war in Africa Rommel was very poorly equipped. The allies were destroying most of the supplies and equipment sent to Romney before the big battle with the British who suffered no such problem and in fact were receiving more supplies and equipment then ever.

The Panzer mk4 and the M4 Sherman were mechanical equals. The Germans were combat veterans. Lead by good Generals. However the German 88mm could kill any vehicle. And frequently did in ambushes

@gruntopolouski5919

2 ай бұрын

Except for the part where 1-on-1, the panzer would kill a Sherman. With enough defenders (and ammo), the Germans could and did put a lock on any given area. Unfortunately, or fortunately, depending on one’s side, there was an endless supply of Shermans, ammo, and Americans… the Germans were out numbered.

@gruntopolouski5919

2 ай бұрын

@@nathanhose1832 which enabled the “lock” on a given area…

@nathanhose1832

2 ай бұрын

I'm sorry you're Wrong. The panther 4. Had a superior gun and armor to the Sherman.. The British put a 17 pounder gun on a Sherman chasse Call the Firefly. That was equal to the Panzer, but we did not have that. We defeated the Germans with overwhelming numbers and air power. Also, the Sherman was really never designed to fight tank on tank battle. It was for infantry support. Check out the tank museum Channel, it will explain all the Differences. i'm not trying to be an a Hole So please don't take that The wrong way . Have a good day.

@brennanleadbetter9708

2 ай бұрын

@nathanhose1832 watch Military History Visualized’s video “Panzer IV vs. Sherman”

@brennanleadbetter9708

2 ай бұрын

@nathanhose1832 Watch “Pz IV vs. Sherman” by Military History Visualized.

No air cover?

No subtitles

Quit repeating the information

🖐

Don’t worry the british had you back.

0:30 Yanks named this tank Will.?

The United States Army in World War II lost quite a few trained tank crews, and the German Military had better tanks later on in the war!

The British could get supplies because they won the battle of the Atlantic and the med.sea the Nazi ss lost it.they lost it all 😂🇬🇧💥🇺🇸

Morning American yup yup yup on healthy Wonderwall don’t mention Vietnam do they

@alanstrong55

2 ай бұрын

Running out of fuel had much to do with Germany's loss. Tunisia has turned against the U.S. and Great Britian, in spite of getting freed.

@brennanleadbetter9708

2 ай бұрын

What does that have to do with this?

@alanstrong55

2 ай бұрын

@@brennanleadbetter9708 Pointing out the part that a nation should remember the forces that liberated their country from a wicked enemy. Nazi Germany was quite rough on the north African republics that they had taken. Turning against the British and American forces is not friendly.

@brennanleadbetter9708

2 ай бұрын

@alanstrong55 I was referring to the original comment above.

@Michael-en7of

Ай бұрын

How’s Brexit working for you?😊

The sherwani was a pile of rubbish Under gunned ,its armour was way to thin .....the only thing it could do was run at speed ....away as it was pants compared to the German mark 4 and 5 ,as for the tiger well when sherwani got hit by an 88mm shell it was obliterated ......simple it was rubbish

@michaelfloyd1127

2 ай бұрын

The Sherman got the job done through overwhelming numbers. I wouldn't call it rubbish. Most early tanks had to be up gunned to be effective. Also, most tanks hit with the a 88mm shell got obliterated.

@brennanleadbetter9708

2 ай бұрын

The armor was quite good for a medium tank.