German soldiers take over the French defense line / All Quiet on the Western Front (2022)
Фильм және анимация
Non-Profit Channel. Fair Use. My Copyright Disclaimer: Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended.
Пікірлер: 58
Атмосферно!
I've seen a couple of clips and love seeing the old soldier leading from the front
For people who dont know this movie is:All quiet on the western front (2022)
il y a comme un gout d'Ukraine. Ce film est d'actualité et le restera dramatiquement.
Well done
Hard !
Beautiful Scene.
@chrismorgan1838
Жыл бұрын
Blood, Guts and Deaths everywhere sure made it a beautiful scene right
More Blood, More Flesh, More Skulls.
No sausage eating scene...? oh no..
This movie is far better than 1917 and is a decent remake of a classic World War I movie. Far more realistic than 1917 war in the trenches was a very brutal affair and is one of the main reason the French surrendered so quickly in the 2nd World War. They did not want a repeat of the first War where nearly three million were killed. I will plan on getting this movie whereas 1917 I will never watch.
@notatroll6809
Жыл бұрын
Lol, so you've never seen 1917, but say it's better? If you were as smart as you think you are, you would know that they really aren't comparable in their meaning and purpose. One is about brutality, as the other is about humanity.
@The_Govermnent
Жыл бұрын
You hate 1917 but you don't plan on watching it? Honestly man maybe just enjoy good films instead of trying to nitpick for accuracy and brutalism
@vlad78th
Жыл бұрын
What are you talking about? Please read a real history book. The French did not surrender so quickly in 1940 because WWI had been brutal. They surrendered because high command had prepared for a rerun of WWI and not for a manoeuvering kind of warfare using tank divisions upheld by overwhelming close air support, something they had started to do at the end of WWI. During the battle of France the French fought as hard has they had done during WWI, their losses in 2 months of intense fighting were of same kind as the worse months of WWI. When the best French and English divisions entered Belgium to protect it from the Germans, the Germans outflanked them and then surrounded them by making a breakthrough near Sedan. The allies then lost the best part of their armies and were not in any way prepared to stop fast moving panzerdivisionen. The battle of France was an utter strategic and tactical failure from the allies part (French and British altogether) absolutely not a lack of courage from the french troops. Then the worst happened. Far right elements and german sympathisers took power and sided with Nazi Germany thinking it would be the winning side and betrayed all France stood for. Yes France did not want to repeat the slaughter WWI had been and it is why during 2 decades they prepared for a defensive war. But during the 30s, a new kind of war emerged and despite having some officiers asking for a deep change of french army doctrine, the high command did not aknowledge the changes happening. But when the war started, the French were willing to defend themselves as ahard as their fathers had been.
@chestersleezer8821
Жыл бұрын
@@vlad78th I will agree that the French High Command were a bunch of idiots but I would disagree with France being willing to fight. When they surrendered the Germans took nearly 1.8 million French prisoners. Also during the Phony War France did invade the Saar when is was vastly under defended and General Gamelin fall off the attack since his soldiers met a vastly undefended Siegfried Line. The French at the time had better tanks sure slow but better but their Air Force was outdated and because to the above inaction after calling off an offensive into Germany they give up when they actually met the enemy.
@cristianmoralezperez7609
Жыл бұрын
in fact 1917 is not so bad maybe it is not up to the standard of this jewel but it is still a good movie
This how Russo Ukraine war looks like in Donetsk
That movie got nothing in common with the novel.
@Courierman6
Жыл бұрын
People really seem to forget that remarque wrote about his book not to have some nice Hollywood Story But to show the true horrors of War witch the 2022 version does well
@jonathanrichwine1996
Жыл бұрын
@@Courierman6 at what point did this movie have a nice story and not show the horrors of war?
@Courierman6
Жыл бұрын
@jonathanrichwine1996 that was my argument that the movie didn't follow some story and showed the true horrors of war
@cassius_at
Жыл бұрын
that's not true it deviates a lot but there are parts that are straight out of the novel
Как этот фильм называется
@adeptasororitas3760
Жыл бұрын
Бахмутская мясорубка
@mymyn69
Жыл бұрын
В Западе ничего нового из романа Эрик Мария Ремарк.
@ExplodingPiggy
Жыл бұрын
Weekend at Bernies
@tylerstewart3181
Жыл бұрын
All quiet on the western front
@connor4231
Жыл бұрын
Seasame street: The movie
deutsch land uber alls 😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐
@ulrichjansen4303
Жыл бұрын
Sind Sie doof?
@ummite6345
Жыл бұрын
@@ulrichjansen4303 nein
@ulrichjansen4303
Жыл бұрын
@@ummite6345 Ich verstehe Sie nicht
Just not sure what the point of this film is. shoot up Hollywood copy rather than world renown anti-war epic. The final battle scene completely looses the point of the book but im sure the producers and financiers will not care.
@reg1mbald294
Жыл бұрын
I've seen people complain over and over about the innacuracies with the book but here's my answer to that, nobody cares about the books, we just want perfeclty historically accurate movies about brutal war, with scenes so surreal that it sends shivers down your spine
@user-yc5um2pl5v
Жыл бұрын
@@reg1mbald294 "perfeclty historically accurate movies ... with scenes so surreal" - what?
@alexlanning712
Жыл бұрын
Hollywood isnt known, for its probity
@chriskey7440
Жыл бұрын
This actually is showing the brutality of war and is an anti-war movie. They wanted to depict how horrible war is, this isn't glorifying war. Also, all the soldiers die, which further shows the waste of war
@Hankeshon
Жыл бұрын
i wouldnt say that this is a remake of the previous all quiet on the western fronts but more like an adaptation. I think paul dying like 2 seconds before the cease fire in a german offensive that late in the war is stupid, and it would have been the germans retreating and the french pushing, but overall i like the movie. it portrays the horrors of ww1 semi-historically accurate. This stuff did happen once-upon-a-time in ww1 (except the ending) but again, i think it was about delivering a message rather than revolutionizing the previous versions.
Please watch it in sub if you can. Such an amazing movie with these actors