The transcript of the interview suggests a conversation centered around negotiations with NATO regarding further disarmament, allegedly involving discussions of a report by General Gogol. Here are the key points identified in the interview transcription:
Misleading Claims and Manipulation:
General ARV asserts that NATO's proposals will not weaken the defensive capabilities and criticizes General Gogol for being overly confident and representing outdated and unrealistic political views. This criticism seems aimed at discrediting Gogol's perspective without substantial evidence.
The reference to overwhelming superiority over NATO forces, with specific numbers on divisions and tanks under their command, appears exaggerated and manipulative. It aims to showcase a false sense of military strength to influence perceptions.
The mention of developing offensive strategies on a new computer named Kutuzov, predicting a swift victory within 5 days with minimal resistance, seems far-fetched and serves as a tactic to instill a false sense of invincibility.
Propaganda and Fearmongering:
General ARV propagates fear by insinuating a potential nuclear response from NATO in case of conflict, emphasizing the division and weakness of the West. This fear-based narrative aims to portray their side as the dominant force and deter any opposition.
The implication of nuclear retaliation and the need to focus on internal issues instead of risking war for conquests portrays a strategic attempt to manipulate emotions and divert attention from actual diplomatic negotiations.
Bullshit Level Assessment:
In summary, the interview transcript exhibits deliberate misinformation, exaggerated military prowess, fearmongering about nuclear retaliation, and attempts to divert attention from diplomatic solutions. The skewed narratives presented by General ARV aim to influence perceptions and manipulate the audience rather than convey genuine information.