Thank you so much Dean, I've learned so much watching your videos that has cleared so many doubts I have had working with GD&T over the past 5 years into my career

@RDeanOdell

Жыл бұрын

Great to hear! Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

This guy is a great teacher.

@RDeanOdell

Жыл бұрын

This guy appreciates the comment! Thankyou.

@vanzz3863

Жыл бұрын

He is indeed

Thank you, really great explanations to fill the theory gaps with practice.

Thank you very much forgiving me a clear idea of choosing a datum!

@RDeanOdell

Жыл бұрын

You’re very welcome!

Thank you, it's a little clearer now but this is still the hardest part for me. Could you perhaps show us a complex geometry part? Something with organic and horz/vertal geometry?

@RDeanOdell

2 жыл бұрын

Hi, I’d be glad to. My website is in the description, if you have an example, you can send it by email and I can take a look.

Your videos are clear, concise and make what can feel like a complex subject easy to understand. Thank you!

@RDeanOdell

2 жыл бұрын

@Rob Gill Thanks so much! I appreciate the positive feedback.

Mr. Dean you are a great teacher!

@RDeanOdell

Жыл бұрын

Thanks! 😃

Thank you for the clear physical examples!

@RDeanOdell

2 жыл бұрын

Do you mean a clear explanation or a clear part? Either way, thanks so much!

@TheRedstonedeluxe

2 жыл бұрын

@@RDeanOdell I meant clear explanation but I guess both work haha.

really, it's a very good explanation, thanks so much Mr Dear

Great explanation. Can you please explain what would be the interpretation of those A, B & C in circle next to feature frame and the numbers 1,3 shown in the triangle..

@RDeanOdell

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks! The circles are revision symbols, the triangles are flag notes that refer to the general notes on the drawing. The complete drawing is available at the link in the description.

Best and simple explanation Ihad ever seen.

@RDeanOdell

8 ай бұрын

Thanks so much!

Always simple and clear

@RDeanOdell

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks so much!

For an assembly like this (a machinists tool) I don't think you would want to make the holes a datum for a reason I didn't hear you mention. Chiefly because threads are typically imprecise and hard to inspect.

It would be greatly appreciated if you would attach a pdf file mentioning what you said in the video as not everyone has a good level of English to understand. Thank you for the video.

every single one of the examples are very good. it makes you understand better.

I never would use the introduced datums B and C for a functional based specification: There are no contacts at B and C! … only air.

Great content

@RDeanOdell

Жыл бұрын

Thanks so much!

how to tell if the feature control frame's tolerance bilateral or unilateral? how to indicate that?

@RDeanOdell

Жыл бұрын

It can be indicated with the “U” symbol in the FCF, or with a phantom line near the part outline on older drawings.

The 3 datum targets of the first datum, resulting in the 3 points forming a surface at an angle to the coordinate plane. Question: Is there any negative effect of if the first datum plane is not being parallel to the coordinate axis at too large an angle?

You are very good sir !!

@RDeanOdell

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

Hello i am recently preparing for the ASME Y14.5 certification. Could you recommend practice problem book?

@RDeanOdell

2 жыл бұрын

I’m not certified, but my understanding is that the test is based very much on the verbatim wording of the Y14.5 standard. I recommend reading the standard cover to cover, and then have someone quiz you on particulars.

@danlev6927

2 жыл бұрын

​@@RDeanOdell I'm learning ASME Y14.5 2009 from ASE and it's torture. I'm a CNC programmer/manufacturing tech and have a background in CMM programming and I found the tests to be infuriating because they're based on the wording and not the practical applications of the rules.

Thank U great video for design and cmm programmers

Hi...plz tell me the difference between orientation and direction

@RDeanOdell

2 жыл бұрын

Hi, What context do you mean? Is your issue in CAD and drawings preparation or in inspection?

@factkarwa391

2 жыл бұрын

@@RDeanOdell In GD&T we always talk about orientation and direction...

Company criteria rules.

And this is why the US can't compete with Asian manufacturing. I've studied GD&T almost since its inception. I know it extremely well. Requirements are placed on components that significantly increase manufacturing cost without providing any benefit to the customer. Now I'll sit back and let the GD&T experts tell me I'm wrong. I'll sit back and watch the western manufacturing market continue to decline while Asian market destroys them.

@RDeanOdell

2 жыл бұрын

Hi, great feedback! I won’t tell you you are wrong. I believe the problem is that designers and management are overly conservative in design requirements because of a lack emphasis in the design process in general, of which GD&T is just a portion. In most of my explanations I use two decimals places and .04 of tolerance. I think many textbooks influence designers in a negative way by using 3-4 decimal places and restrictive geometric controls in many examples. In my opinion GD&T is a way to get design, manufacturing and inspection on the same page, and is not limited to critical high performance items with tight tolerances. Is there something else I should be teaching my students that would help us compete with Asian manufacturing?

@jon-williammurphy9780

6 ай бұрын

Do you think GD&T is one of the top 5 reasons the US lost the manufacturing market?