1:54 - Mechanic: Opens hood, checks tire pressure... looks at Engine and says "Yep, everything looks good" then closes hood. I hope he had his X-Ray eyesight certification. Also, that will be 89.99+ tax for the inspection. LOL

Removing that roof rack would be a good place to start...

@livefreeordiehard8898

8 жыл бұрын

Ikr. It adds at least 1L/100km

@MegaAsuku

6 жыл бұрын

A year ago everyone blamed the lady for her roof rack. But now we know VW lies about fuel efficiency hmmmmm

@newtonraymond77

5 жыл бұрын

That roof rack is negligible

@MichaelNNguyen

5 жыл бұрын

But Mary might need to use those roof rack for her skiing equipment just incase he want to go skiing. lol

NO F150 in history would get 32 MPG

@jahmel9780

5 жыл бұрын

They use kilometers and liters

@lifesabitch90

5 жыл бұрын

Maybe downhill, neutral, engine off

@mitchsfarm

5 жыл бұрын

it was getting 12L per 100 KM which is 19.6 MPG. Please if you're uneducated don't comment.

@naughtbutme1451

5 жыл бұрын

Even if it was electric

@coolhacker1025

5 жыл бұрын

On the labels in Canada that show mileage, they use miles per Imperial Gallon, meaning that 32MPG is not the same in Canada and the US (32 US MPG=7.3Litres/100km, 32 Imperial =8.82 Litres/100km). That said, officially in the US, the 2014 F-150 gets 21 mpg (11.2 Litres/100km, 25.2 Imperial), so a person would be using roughly 2.4 more litres per 100km than it's advertised

Maybe if she got rid of the roof rack her fuel economy would improve

@tinderinc

9 жыл бұрын

surfinburdlax she says shes doing 1000km a week that's like 48,000km a year and it only cost her an extra $600 that's nothing but the roof rack a/c and hammer down. She is just mad that she over paid a new VW cost the dealer $10,000 then they put $3200 in PDI and delivery and overhead then there is a $5000 commission split 50/50 with the sales manger and sales person. So you wonder why your car is worth less than $10,000 a less than a year after you paid $18,500+ its because the car was only worth $10,000 to start and the rest was all commission $8500 in depreciation on commission save your self some $ buy used

@seanthorton3054

9 жыл бұрын

***** What?

@tinderinc

9 жыл бұрын

sean thorton Basically she got screwed when she bought the car and paid $8500 in commission. If the purchase price was $18,500

@fantastopotomus

9 жыл бұрын

***** Yeah really 1000km/wk is a lot of course you're going to pay more in gas over the long haul.

@crobulari2328

9 жыл бұрын

surfinburdlax It would.

"When you're putting that kind of *kilometers* on a car you want something with good gas *mileage*" "That place is 300 clicks from here" MAKE UP YOUR MIND, CANADA

@HowTwo007

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah i live in canada and just relize that. Clicks by definition is a slang and means kilometres. I guess we just say mileage since kilometerage sound wierd

@JustaMomnFamily

4 жыл бұрын

👍

@mam362

3 жыл бұрын

omg these terms are new and scary!

@byronchavarria4954

3 жыл бұрын

@@HowTwo007 I Say Kilometerage

@byronchavarria4954

3 жыл бұрын

@@HowTwo007 Kilometers Not Kilometres

The fuel mileage you showed for the F150 on Ford's website was for the 4x2 3.7L single cab. Not the 3.5L twin turbo Ecoboost Supercrew which is rated at 16 L/100km city, and 11. 5L/100km highway. Considering you were testing the Ecoboost, the 12L/100km that you got in mixed driving is right as axvertised. A little research goes a long way.

@shayanmalik7152

7 жыл бұрын

Advertised**

@charlesvandergrift3126

6 жыл бұрын

Not quite, as I think you are looking at the updated, more accurate ratings. I'm an American so intuitively, MPG is easier for me to relate to than L/100km so I will be using MPG for my argument. CBC's screenshot shows a highway rating of 32 MPG. Let's assume the best and say that is, in fact, for the 3.7, which is marginally more efficient than the turbo 3.5. The US EPA states that for that year, make, and model, the highway MPG is a more realistic 23. The EPA also says that the turbo 3.5 model gets 22 highway. Extrapolating this 1-MPG difference to the Canadian 3.7 rating, we see that the 3.5 should be rated at about 31 MPG. Ford's overestimation would be laughable if it wasn't so misleading and I am very glad that Canada has clamped down on these overinflated fuel economy numbers.

@jellyfishattack

6 жыл бұрын

MPG are much easier for Canadians to understand too - maybe I'm just too old at 43, but when I was in grade JK-6, we still had conversion tables on the back of every notebook we wrote in in school.

@realazee

6 жыл бұрын

Shayan Malik v

@CALAMARI_BOYS

6 жыл бұрын

The fuel economy numbers are just inflated to meet government regulation, the marketing side is just half the purpose.

How dumb would you have to be to think that fuel economy doesn't depend on how you drive. If you thought that than that's like saying if you sprinted everywhere, you would not be tired because it requires the same amount of energy as walking. I don't think dealers have to tell people that fuel economy depends on how you drive.

@walkermorales337

5 жыл бұрын

Project_Evo that lady was ignorant at best, at worst she just wants to get compensation and is just lying to get it

@mysticflow467

5 жыл бұрын

but.. it shows different fuel economy for highway and town.. why would anyone actually look farther into it than - faster(highway) = more fuel economy slower and more breaking = less fuel economy(towns) you don't have to be dumb, in your own comparison it'd be like the company saying if you sprint everywhere you can do 2 km/hr and if you jog everywhere you can do 1.5 km/hr and if you walk everywhere you can do 1 km/hr why would you suddenly look into what shoes you're wearing, how aerodynamic your clothing is, how good your water is. you wouldn't. look fact is nobody COULD EVER get the mileages posted, because in the test shops they didn't even account for accelerating and stopping? change my mind

@asrr62

5 жыл бұрын

@@mysticflow467 haha exactly.im getting the advertised mpg lol. it says UP TO 27 mpg city lol. meaning that is the best mpg u can get but you better be little granny when youir driving.

@FelixBouchardDetail

4 жыл бұрын

On my civic i can get 600 km on one tank, but i can also get 400. Driving changes everything when it comes to fuel economy

@jessefisher1809

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah... I mean it should go without saying that your fuel economy isnt going to be as advertised however lets not fight amongst ourselves... all this could possibly lead to is more honest advertising.

this lady has a roof rack on her tdi yet she complains about small numbers.

@charlesvandergrift3126

8 жыл бұрын

+Juan Gallegos No kidding, talk about bad aerodynamics.

@MegaAsuku

6 жыл бұрын

A year ago everyone blamed the lady for her roof rack. But now we know VW lies about fuel efficiency

@mujjuman

6 жыл бұрын

vw didnt lie about fuel economy . they lied about emissions

@newtonraymond77

5 жыл бұрын

Many mechanics claim that a diesel engine's performance isn't affected much by towing so a little roof rack shouldn't do that much damage

@MichaelNNguyen

5 жыл бұрын

But Mary might need to use those roof rack for her skiing equipment just incase he want to go skiing. lol

"I'm not getting the fuel economy that you said I would get" says the woman with a roof rack that's probably loaded when driving. Seriously does anybody know basic physics anymore? Smh -.-

@mattmax11

9 жыл бұрын

Why are you assumeing she has her roof loaded with stuff.

@Darksyne

9 жыл бұрын

I said "probably" besides why have a roof rack on a car if you're not gonna use it. It's not an suv

@systematic101

9 жыл бұрын

***** Just having the roof rack reduces the cars aerodynamics and thus reduces the fuel efficiency

@cb8621

8 жыл бұрын

+krauser979 She just oozes of entitled bitchiness. "I feel like I'm owed something." with that nasty, ugly, little smug look on her fat face...UGH!! That's the type of woman who returns a 90% eaten tofu stir-fry because it was too salty or a mattress after sleeping on it for 3 months claiming it injured her back. Also, she makes it sound like the VW people are putting her out SO MUCH by telling her to "follow the speed limit, drive like an old woman," if you want to get 49 mpg, you need to drive conservatively, obviously! No car is going to get the claimed mpg number if you ever put your pedal to the floor or accelerate with the needle over halfway up the tach. Sorry, that woman simply infuriated me.

@InvisibleYetVisible

8 жыл бұрын

+krauser979 "Basically told me to drive like an old woman"..... ahh so she's also probably hammering 100MPH on the fucking freeway

I thought it was funny when the nurse said that the dealer told her she had to follow the speed limit. As if that's an unreasonable suggestion. Oh, the horror! Follow the speed limit? They cannot be serious! That honking great roof rack probably doesn't help with fuel efficiency either. That being said, the OEMs definitely exaggerate the fuel efficiency of their vehicles.

@mam362

6 жыл бұрын

honestly, if you went out and drove no higher than the speed limit, you would quickly end up in an accident because you wouldnt keep up with the flow of traffic

@hansgerd8069

5 жыл бұрын

Even in Germany we follow the Speed Limits on the Autobahn sometimes ^^

@TraceLight

3 жыл бұрын

@@hansgerd8069 lmao, the autobahn fun. We aren’t allowed to have one, it’s either people are incompetent drivers or the ones that aren’t have a stick up their rear end and can’t figure how to drive over 70 mph.

should you get compensated? No, I don't believe you should. If saving a few pennies per mile is important to you turn off your AC, roll up your windows, maintain a constant 55 mph on the highway, avoid slowing down and speeding up, never accelerate while going uphill, don't haul around more fuel than you need (quarter tank will do), make sure your tire pressure stays slightly above recommended pressure for your tires, live at sea level, and accept that you will not match the numbers because the test is done in a lab and is there to compare it to other cars that are tested under the same unrealistic "perfect" conditions.

@Jin88866

5 жыл бұрын

Good tips, but accelerating while going uphill is actually good for fuel economy if you don't downshift, because engine efficiency is highest at high load.

@lifesabitch90

5 жыл бұрын

Jin Sato high load, low rpm. Thank you for being intelligent

@dbzownz12345

2 жыл бұрын

I say go turn your car into a "track car" by removing everything except for the driver's seat & you'll def get those numbers 👍

@elephant1851

2 жыл бұрын

@@Jin88866 That is both correct and incorrect depending on the scenario. To address one of those scenarios: Yes, more.efficient to always be in high gear = low rpm and high load. But when going up and down hills on a highway it's much better to use momentum of a car already in motion and just maintain speed uphill or even reduce speed slightly for even better efficiency in moving the car regardless of engine efficiency. In other words why would you waste all that energy speeding up only to be counteracted by NOT ONLY aerodynamics and rolling friction of the tires against the ground but ALSO by climbing the hill. If you want to speed up just wait till you're rolling downhill and you wouldn't use as much fuel as you would speeding up on level ground and definitely not as much as you would speeding up uphill. Get it?

I did my own test one day. Traveled 56 miles to a destination going 72mph on a highway got me 28.7 MPG, going the same distance travelling between 55-60mph got me about 31.3 MPG. Car is a 2012 Mazda 6 2.5L automatic. Nothing surprising here, but the difference in mileage was more than I expected honestly.

The fuel ratings are just numbers meant to compare vehicles.. If you REALLY want to save gas money there are methods. Hypermilers get better than advertized gas mileage just from over inflating the tires and some driving techniques.

@Darksyne

9 жыл бұрын

Ya but any money you save on gas that way gets wasted on prematurely worn tires

@lejink

9 жыл бұрын

Trichome Farmer Uhh, it works.. That's what people do to get higher mpg than advertised.. I wasn't giving advice I was just saying what I've seen

@lejink

9 жыл бұрын

Trichome Farmer Do you always over react like this, or is your vagina especially sandy today? "you're going to wear your tires out twice as fast" Maybe if you doubled the pressure you would create uneven wear, but adding 20% won't have any drawbacks. I'd imagine your shocks would pay a price but the tires would be fine as long as you rotate them on a schedule. And yes, driving techniques are important to saving gas as well. Like coasting and avoiding using the brakes as much as possible.. "especially in canada where they get really bad winters" Well, snow tires are important for winter.. Again though, another 20% air pressure in a good winter tire won't have any negative drawbacks and will reduce rolling resistance. Next time you feel yourself ready to lose your shit over a simple comment, maybe take a few deep breaths and think if it's worth flipping out over.

@lejink

9 жыл бұрын

Trichome Farmer You're high strung, I feel terrible for anyone who has to deal with your temper on a daily basis

@NOFATCHICK1

9 жыл бұрын

Trichome Farmer I have a mazda 3, and the recommended psi my tires are 32 psi If I was to ad 2-3 psi I would get 1-2 better mpg, but have a stiffer rider, and lower psi wear out tires more not the other way around...

There is a HUGE difference in mileage if you drive the speed limit, don't accelerate too quickly, look ahead and time lights so you don't race to a light just to start again. I've exceeded the stated mileage for every vehicle I have ever owner. It is also very important to have proper tire inflation, clean filters and fluid, tuneup and less weight in the car. Most people that complain have at least one of the mentioned above wrong with their car or they drive too fast/aggressive.

@SerenaCavanaugh

7 жыл бұрын

seriously, I haven't been driving long but ever since I started it was just like instant instinct for me to drive as efficiently as possible. Gets pretty annoying all the time seeing people race to lights, and especially when I just want to coast to my light but some hound behind me wants to race to it. You have to wonder if they're really that ignorant and don't realize the mileage thing or maybe their favourite activity is buying gas lol

@nhcharmedone

6 жыл бұрын

BS

@highstreetkillers4377

5 жыл бұрын

I drive a manual, accelerating too slow burns more. Its annoying seeing all the automatics on the road constantly braking, especially on the 401. Should never be touching your brakes on the 401

@TIm7981

5 жыл бұрын

Right on the money.

@lifesabitch90

5 жыл бұрын

Hahaha. SSSOOOOOOOO true

Hello, everyone. USA American right here and I’ve been watching a bunch of these CBC Marketplace episodes and I have a few observations: 1. Canadians are super incredibly nice 2. Even when Canadians are angry or “fighting” they are still being super nice 3. You all pronounce your words so cute! 4. Canadians seem to switch between SAE and metric frequently 5. I wish we in USA America had the same sorts of problems you all have in Canadia.

LooK at how much drag that roof rack with wind deflector would cause on that lady's VW. Theirs the main cause of her poor economy

@hoxtonplayspayday2andmore947

5 жыл бұрын

VW lied about that huge scam

@MichaelNNguyen

5 жыл бұрын

But Mary might need to use those roof rack for her skiing equipment just incase he want to go skiing. lol

Are these peopke fkn serious??? Someone has to tell you that your fuel ecomony depends on how you drive?? Thats just common sense, something most ppl dont seem to have anymore, apparently..

The tdi lady had a bike rack which is a fuel economy killer

@ivanangelov7087

7 жыл бұрын

Agreed roof rack not good. I actually owned one of those before the VW scandal and i had made up to 50+mpg on the freeway and driving 75-80mp/h

@MichaelNNguyen

5 жыл бұрын

But Mary might need to use those roof rack for her skiing equipment just incase he want to go skiing. lol

Dad's 300C gets 22L/100km in the city and we're not complaining. Even though the stickers says 14.7L/100km. It has the HEMI V8.

I drive a 1996 Chevy Tahoe. 350, V-8. Auto, 4x4. I pull a 23 foot Terry travel trailer with it. When I started I got 8 mpg pulling the trailer. 12 combined without. I've added headers, K&N air filter, dualed of the exhaust with high performance mufflers. This allows the truck to breathe easier. I also upgraded the distributor, cap and rotor to high performance ones. I keep the tires at the proper pressure. Now I get about 14mpg pulling the trailer and almost 20mpg not pulling it. Sane driving helps tremendously, yet, when I need power or wanna play, it's a beast!

5:15 a new reporter texting and driving..... Nice

Do people really go into a car dealership without researching the car first and just believe everything the sales person says? I mean you could easily just pull out your phone and do a 10 second google search to find the realistic milage of the car you are looking at. I mean that just pure stupidity right there.

@googleplusisdead

4 жыл бұрын

Yes.

@jasonmgavitt2357

4 жыл бұрын

I hear ya.not everyone’s that wise.

@jessefisher1809

4 жыл бұрын

Your right. But dont you think this is a good opportunity to improve the honesty of vehicle advertising. I know you want to feel smarter than other people but what really is there to gain by that argument.

@googleplusisdead

4 жыл бұрын

@@jessefisher1809 And just how/what would make this change? It's already illegal to misrepresent something about a car, including the mileage.

@jessefisher1809

4 жыл бұрын

and the change would be made through legislation. I mean it was all explained in the video.

This show is more valuable than a goldmine. Keep spreading the truth. Excelsior...

Any car guy should know in the United States that cars are tested on pretty much a roller system and they rarely hit speeds above 55mph. The cars are never forced into stop start, up/down hill, highway, change in weather, weight load on the vehicle. So when you see the window sticker MPG you should always +/- 1~5. Not only that take into consideration your foot. Heavier the foot, the more gas you're going to consume.

@xdeler

8 жыл бұрын

+Zeiss120 How can they do that? Wouldn't that completely eliminate the effects of air resistance?

@highstreetkillers4377

5 жыл бұрын

Wind and temperature affect me the most plus if i rev it high

@byronchavarria4954

2 жыл бұрын

United States 🇺🇸 km/h

@Zeiss120

2 жыл бұрын

@@xdeler damn this is old. Yeah weather also effects your gas mileage but they don't take that into consideration. I'm not sure how Canada does it but looking at your window sticker but looks like they just take what the EPA says. In recent years they said they would do "real world" like testing but you should always just take it with some grain of salt.

This is how you get better MPG 1) CLOSE windows (opened windows do more damage to MPG than AC). FACT. 2) Don't rev past 2.5k RPM. Lower revs, better MPG. 3) On hwy - turn on cruise control. The car will select the best gear with optimal MPG 4) Any aftermarket parts might increase air resistance (worse aerodynamics) and reduce MPG. Heater and AC do decrease MPG (better than opened windows), as well as AWD. Now, in regards to the video. The woman with VW has a freaking roof rack. That thing alone can EASILY add 1L/100km because it acts as an air brake (like on McLaren supercar).

@highstreetkillers4377

5 жыл бұрын

Buy a manual so you'll learn how to drive. Cruize control? How lazy are you? I drove 8 hours in a manual no problem

@ralakus8784

4 жыл бұрын

@@highstreetkillers4377 OK boomer

How can that VW woman complain when she is running around with a roof rack !!!! That increases your milage by at least 20%.

@marcjtdc

6 жыл бұрын

maybe 5%. I got 36-43 mpg on a corolla with a yakima roof rack. the sticker said 38!

@hoxtonplayspayday2andmore947

5 жыл бұрын

VW lied about that big time #diesilgate

@MichaelNNguyen

5 жыл бұрын

But Mary might need to use those roof rack for her skiing equipment just incase he want to go skiing. lol

I need more videos of him singing, he has a very delightful and soothing voice =)

It's nice that the show visited Lambton County (where I'm originally from, a smaller town called Inwood).

My tires claimed 50k miles but I want to do burnouts constantly! I only got 5k miles, Shame on them. So they should adjust their stats so I feel warm and fuzzy inside and compensate me......... The rational of everyone on the show is just absurd. I can and do on a daily basis surpass the Mahony Sticker ratings for my vehicles by driving sensibly. I can also blow my gas tank in half the time by driving like an race car driver.

@AndieBlack13

8 жыл бұрын

+sixtyfiveford Agreed, "your mileage may vary" ....the mantra from long ago...One can, & many do attain these published mileage values, depends entirely on HOW you drive....less so on what you drive. I find nothing more irritating than riding shotgun in someones car & it's either full throttle or full-on braking, nether is good for mileage nor the vehicle in general. These are the types who constantly complain about the poor quality of their cars, frequent breakdowns & such....& they don't even notice how poorly they drive!

@sixtyfiveford

8 жыл бұрын

Ricardo Ellison Well said.

@ainzooalgown7589

8 жыл бұрын

+sixtyfiveford I drift so my tires go to crap faster than the advertised they tell me it can last 1 year but it only lasts me a week, so should they should refund me 51 sets of tires each year

@coldincanada1

8 жыл бұрын

Top Gear did a test of this where they put a Prius and a BMW M3 on the track with x amount of fuel in both. The Prius drove as fast as it could around the track and the BMW just had to keep up. The Prius ran out of fuel first.

@ainzooalgown7589

8 жыл бұрын

Matthew Vandermay if i remember correctly bmw diesel models have a function that allows them to reuse the fumes if there is fuel mix left over in it

If you actually believed what they told you you deserve what you get lol

@TIMEtoRIDE900

9 жыл бұрын

CDubs HasIt Exactly - read reviews in C/D & R/T magazines.

@daltont3878

8 жыл бұрын

+CDubs HasIt Well I think the people lying are the ones that deserve something

@topherd1011

8 жыл бұрын

+Mike Hunt their beefs are very minute. Now if you bought a VW, I DO feel a little sorry for you because they actually tried to defraud folks but the folks in this video are bitching about not getting advertised gas mileage when they very well know those are estimates in the best of conditions.

@glorybelieve9010

4 жыл бұрын

CDubs HasIt ADVERTISING IS THERE FOR A REASON!! There are also LAWS TO COVER ADVERTISING, and IF YOU FALSE ADVERTISE IT IS A CRIME!!!

@TraceLight

3 жыл бұрын

@@glorybelieve9010 how is it false advertising. That’s the maximum possible MPG in perfect conditions. If you drive a V8 like a grandma does in perfect conditions, you’ll be getting better MPG than taking a little 4 cylinder and driving like a maniac.

wow, this is an eye- opener!

thank you, I love your show..

10:20 that guy forgot to mention it needs to be 100% perfect conditions like a lab

who buys a car based on the fuel economy? if all those tests were made in a lab, than all cars have the same result, means if u buy the car with the lowest fuel economy, u get the best car. nomatter if its 10% more, since all the others have 10% aswell..

@218Flows

8 жыл бұрын

+masterlooser15 If they tell you your car is going to get 32 miles per gallon on the highway, it better be close to 32 not half, 16.. What is that? What if your job said they'll pay you $20 dollars per hour, but they only payed you $10? How would you feel?

@masterlooser15

8 жыл бұрын

***** still, if i buy the car with the lowest fuel eco. i still have the one with the lowest. means if they tell me i get 20$ an hour and everyone gets 15$ i still get paid the best, even tho i only get 10$ and everyone else only gets 7.5$. see where i am going?

@PandaMan02

8 жыл бұрын

+masterlooser15 the tests are not done in the same lab, and some manufacturers cheat, see volkswagon.

@AOTanoos22

8 жыл бұрын

+PandaWonka volkswagon didn't cheat because of fuel consumption its because of car exhaust and the woman with the vw jetta has a roof connection, which is not good for the aerodynamics and thus her car uses more fuel. If she would take that thing of she would get a better gas milage of at least 0,5 liters/100 km.

@QiuyuanChenRyan916

6 жыл бұрын

I do, but not going to argue that much in detail. However, there is a difference between 23 and 33 mpg.

Here I am driving a rusty old 5 speed 96 sentra with blown rear shocks and bushings going bad cruising on the highway at 42 mpg with no cruise control and windows down.

While I get why some people might be mad, if you want to get those numbers, you have to change your driving habits. If you are hard on the gas, it doesn't matter if you drive a Prius or a Lamborghini. Top gear did a great test. They told a prius to drive as fast as it can around a track and told an M3 to just keep pace with the prius. The prius burnt more gas than the M3 because it was full throttle the entire time while the M3 was barely leaning on the throttle. Also, a/c or the windows down will impact it. This like complaining that you didn't get the advertised 0-60 time when you have the A/C on, the windows rolled down, and you're towing a boat.

TDI "Clean" diesel

@CalebCissna

7 жыл бұрын

#dieselgate

@steamserver132

7 жыл бұрын

There is diesel which is made of some plants. So thats maybe what the mean about it? :-)

@adamd5013

7 жыл бұрын

Clean Diesel = Clean Coal = Propaganda for dummies.

Get a Civic or Prius if you want better mpg.

@EdPMur

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, averaging 5.0L/100 km in our 2018 Prius c

@TonyKimtheamusementparkfan

3 жыл бұрын

I always get good fuel mileage on my RAV-4 when in Eco Mode. On the freeway usually about 7-8 L/100 km and on local roads usually 9-10 L/100 km. Usually lasts me a long time.

@byronchavarria4954

2 жыл бұрын

My Prius Is 14.9 Liters Per 100 Kilometers Long Island NY

@byronchavarria4954

2 жыл бұрын

Civic Is Trash

VW Passat Variant V. gen. 1.9TDI 96kW (2004) Oficially declared consumption, when first bought: 8l-10l/100km Previous owner: 7l-8l/100km My avg. consumption: 5.3l-5,6l/100km Lowest achieved avg. consumption: 3.6l/100km Highest achieved avg. consumption: 6.4l/100km Yes, it IS about the driving style.

2011 chevy Silverado 5.3l V8, 6 speed automatic, 3.43 diffs, 245/70r17 at 38psi = 12.5l/100km (22.5 miles per imperial gallons) average. About half highway, half city. I don't know what is the advertised milleage (got the truck used), but I am pretty happy with it. I got it to 10.8l/100 once on a 3 hour highway trip at 100km/hours on cruise control.

Some of these episodes are really just grasping at straws

I have a Prius and get about 54 MPG but I also do everything I can to maximize my gas mileage. I use an awesome program on my computer www.lonewolf-software.com/automotivewolf.htm to track my vehicle maintenance schedule, expenses, gas mileage and send me a reminder when any maintenance is due. This helps me remember to change the oil every 5K miles, rotate my tires and track the overall performance of my vehicle. Just keeping your oil and filters clean and tires in good shape will help gas mileage. I also use low resistance rolling tires which gives me a small improvement in MPG. I also go easy on the gas pedal when accelerating and coast when ever possible.

@JohnWick-yk3eg

5 жыл бұрын

I use Automotive Wolf for my vehicles too. It's great software and definitely helps you to keep any vehicle in optimum running condition.

@62savage8

5 жыл бұрын

pussy

@prismickyubey1185

5 жыл бұрын

Did you get your epic victory royale yet?

@62savage8

5 жыл бұрын

@@prismickyubey1185 yes

@asrr62

5 жыл бұрын

is the extra 20 mpg worth it? im just not sure about how reliable a prius is.

4:38 They weren't lying about how popular the truck is lol

I was able to beat the manufacturers claimed fuel efficiency in my '01 Honda Civic (28mpg city, 35 highway). I modified the car, cold air intake, headers, exhaust, chip, better wheels and tires, the average I usually got between fill-ups was 35-38mpg, but my record over a long road trip in the rocky mountains was 44.5mpg.

You Canadians, just use the American EPA fuel mileage estimates. He got the advertised 19 MPG by the American EPA.

@n_u001

6 жыл бұрын

Canadian cars dont shop MPG, they show L/100km, so you cannot compare the american advertisements to your car

@guanqiaowang7586

6 жыл бұрын

nouse use just convert them

@Zack-dk3pt

6 жыл бұрын

for real don't even need to be good at math just go to google and type in kmpg to mpg converter

@mujjuman

6 жыл бұрын

i know right how the hell is a f150 supposed to get 32mpg

@TraceLight

3 жыл бұрын

@@mujjuman on what planet do some bozo think they will get anywhere near 32 mpg with a car that big being hauled around by an engine of that size that has to work harder to move. And honestly, if you buy an F-150 and go for the ECO BOOST instead of any of the V8s, you deserve it.

1971 Plymouth Hemi Cuda. No need to fall for that "go green" trick.

If you think it was bad in traffic in Toronto, try sitting in traffic on the 405 Freeway in Los Angeles. It is jam packed.

I was a Ford Car Salesman in Ca and I let customers know about the factory tests that determine MPG ratings and small kinks that could possibly improve fuel efficiency and that never stopped them from purchasing, so it's not going to ruin a sale by being honest.

I have a ford f-150 and it's fuel efficiency has exceeded the expectations

@hannahberscheid1502

7 жыл бұрын

i looked further into my projected milage and it is far more reasonable than the Canadian ones shown

@michaelguppy4518

7 жыл бұрын

i have and older tdi jetta and i get 4.1L/100km far better than the numbers

@jellyfishattack

6 жыл бұрын

Me too, so long as I drive w/the windows up.

the bike mounts on top of the car dont help with mileage. there is a reason why Thule doesn't even recommend going over 80km h

@byronchavarria4954

2 жыл бұрын

80 km/h 50 MPH

cruise countrol actually saves a lot of fuel when either on the freeway or highway. Try to distribute the weight of the stuff you carry (mostly to the front) , inflate your tires to the recommended psi, give proper maintenence to the car and if the car comes equiped with the auto/start stop. use it, that thing alone will give you up to 10% more range on city.

My dad's Hyundai Galloper has had very little maintenance(untouched engine with manual transmission) for the last 15 years (bought new) and has 10-11 L/100Km witch is a lot for him since it did 8-9 L/100Km when it was new. Not bad for a 15K€ Diesel SUV.

5:15 Texting and driving brought to you by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation

@amvsandggs3548

4 жыл бұрын

Omfg lol

@sausages6135

4 жыл бұрын

It was a closed course ok! Lol

@malo5929

3 жыл бұрын

Lmao lal🤣💀

I haven't ever bought a truck for the fuel economy....

I recently drove a Nissan Rogue on about an hour long trip and averaged 36mpg. With about 40 minutes on the highway and the other 20 on suburban roads. I was quite impressed as the highway estimated mpg is 33 mpg and 26 city and on the highway I even hit around 40 at some points

Last year I rented a 1/2 ton full size chevy pickup in Phoenix to drive to, and around, the Grand Canyon - 90% highway, but up and down mountains. I was amazed to get 27.5 MPG. Have had a 2018 Buick Encore since it had 12 miles.If I remember correctly, EPA numbers are 28 city, 33 Hiway, 30 combined. It currently has 27,xxx miles, with MPG for all those miles - 36.8 - 20% higher than advertised. A tremendous amount of mileage is based on driving habits. I bought the same exact vehicle for a daughter, and her aggregate MPG was 27.2 at 20,xxx miles

@whbanks

Жыл бұрын

U bought a car to one of your daughters? Damn

Well, if you look at the way people drive, it is nearly impossible to get the milage. The only time of the year that I cannot get the mileage that it says on the window sticker is during the winter or driving on mountainous areas. Most of the time, I get better milage. Don't be a rabbit and take of things that affect the aerodynamics. The Canadian standard is not as realistic as the US standard.

@Pfshens

9 жыл бұрын

What you have never seen might be possible for other people. Btw, I was born and raised in Canada and it is people like you who are a disgrace to this country.

@Cordalemark

9 жыл бұрын

***** 《 with a name like yours you are not a Canadian either so who are you to tell him to go back to asia

@Cordalemark

9 жыл бұрын

Peter Shen don't let people like this idiot make you think all Canadians are racist like this idiot

@Cordalemark

9 жыл бұрын

***** no your not millions of people mabe you should go back to your country you racest idiot

@Cordalemark

9 жыл бұрын

***** lol and what makes you think I'm a immigrant you racest idiot. Because I stick up for someone who is Chinese. I'm from Newfoundland you imbecile last I checked that's part of Canada I'm more true Canadian than you will ever be you racest looser.

This video makes me want an F150

My 2011 Honda is rated for 40mpg highway, I get between 30/35 on most trips(not just highway) I've never gotten much above that, but I'm happy with those numbers.

I own a 2013 Honda Insight (bought new) so its mileage has been consistent all along, beating the official number by approx. 2mpg (43 mpg vs 41 mpg combined) and I am not slouch driver so there you have it.

Too much complaining, do a research, you are 30+ of age..

They call it Average City and Average Highway but there is nothing Average about it.

Omg the Host is singing sooo goood !!

Tips: if you have a manual always put it in the highest gear. 5th or 6th. If you have a car that is not older than 2010 when going downhill just realese the gas an use compression braking your car shuts off the fuel injection.

That Jetta has a THULE rack on top of the car, yeah that will kill mileage as well.

common sense should tell you that is how you drive that makes your gas man is good or bad

He's coming through with the vocals!

I usually drive 5 mph over the speed limit on local roads and at least 110 to 115 on the freeway. My average fuel mileage for my Toyota RAV-4 is 9.4 L/100 km combined, with 10.7 L/100 km in the city with 8.4 L/100 km on the freeway. I usually get around those numbers especially on the freeway when it's much lower at around 7.5 L/100 km. City driving I usually get it around 9.5 L/100 km. My RAV-4 is usually always good on gas and I have no problems. I've driven from Richmond Hill to London which is almost 2.5 hours away from each other and I was good on one tank of gas alone. It was almost empty but not to the point where it was a fraction of a second away from empty.

12L/100km is perfectly normal for a car as big as this one. My 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is doing 14L/100km So don't trust the ad ^^

want a better mileage? go prius

@heisenfeis

9 жыл бұрын

i2k Borrowed my aunts Prius, drove it for a week eraticaly acseeding speeds upto 160 kmt on small roads (paved) and in powermode all the time to get that extra response from the pedal. i would floor it out from standstill when the road was clear of traffic in an intersection (no traffic lights in my town) Drove about 800 km and it took me 1 week. result 35 liters of fuel about 75 dollars in gas money (i live in norway so its like 9 dollars a gallon). In other words dirt cheap.

@Pseudynom

5 жыл бұрын

Walk.

@heidernheinreich4827

5 жыл бұрын

@@heisenfeis it doesn't count you live in Norway lol

I often get well over the estimated fuel economy in my 2004 Chevy Malibu and in my 2015 Subaru Outback.

It is way better in the US. Like, my old Pontiac Grand Prix advertised 25 to 27 Mpg when purchased new. It has now gone over 201 thousand miles. I like to calculate the Mpg by hand every once in awhile to make sure everything is functioning well. You go to your favorite gas station, fill up the tank as full as it will allow, then hit the trip meter and drive until you need gas again. Go back to the same gas station on the same pump and fill the tank all the way up as much as possible again. Write down how many gallons you just purchased. Say hypothetically you got 15.336 gallons and the trip meter reads 400.0 miles. You then divide the number of miles (400) by the numbers of gallons used to refill the tank (15.336). 400.0/15.336= 26.1 miles per gallon. I found that depending on how aggressively I accelerate and how much I speed, and whether I drive mostly on the highway or mostly in town or a mixture, I achieved between 22.1 and 30.0 Miles per gallon with my typical driving getting just under 25mpg on average. It is duly noted that if I drive very carefully, (all the other drivers literally hate me) I virtually never touching my breaks, and accelerate very very slowly and always use the cruise control and maintain my car excessively then I can push my mpg to 30-32mpg with instantaneous mpg readings on the highway/freeway hovering around 45 to 50mpg and in town between 15 and 24mpg, but that is very difficult to maintain and requires that I stay very far back from other cars to never need to break and only accelerate gradually. It was fun to experiment how high I could get it on my 44-mile round trip commute to college for four years, but it is otherwise impractical if you are not doing an experiment and have all the time in the world. I found that my car gets the best return on energy when going 45mph. At 55mph the wind resistance is higher but it is still quite good. At 70mph which many highways are around me, my car gets less mpg as there is much more wind resistance to overcome constantly. It is quite easy to tell when you using more gas by looking at the RPM gauge on your dash.

I get the proper gas mileage, 7.1L/100km for my 2007 Mazda 3. Remember your best mileage is with a manual transmission!

@jacktran960

7 жыл бұрын

MyKonaRC That's only if it's an older model

@justarandomguy3969

6 жыл бұрын

new automatic actually have better gas mileage XD auto.howstuffworks.com/fuel-efficiency/fuel-economy/better-fuel-economy-manual-or-automatic.htm

@highstreetkillers4377

5 жыл бұрын

Yes!I have a manual and when the gas light is on i can keep going.Manual is only good if you pay attention and learn. Seeing how many can't handle 2 pedals i see why manuals are leaving. I can't even drive an automatic, i feel out of control

@highstreetkillers4377

5 жыл бұрын

just a random guy, they say that cause people these days can't drive anything else. Someone like me can do better than an automatic transmission cause i know how to shift

Ford is B.S. My mom calls Ford cars: *Fix* *Or* *Repair* *Daily* Cars

@socketyellow3

7 жыл бұрын

Pryncess Angelyk Found On Road Dead

@normand9354

7 жыл бұрын

Ford Owners Recommend Dodge

@CrizzyCrazy

7 жыл бұрын

My Mustang handles amazingly well :)

@naytwothousandthree

7 жыл бұрын

Pryncess Angelyk or as mine say *Found* *On* *Road* *Dead*

@chriscooper3503

7 жыл бұрын

XD the second company I've heard with a saying like that. first was lotus from Jeremy Clarkson which went like this Lots Of Trouble Usually Serious Lotus

I bought a 2006 Ram 1500 hemi with 315k. The reader said 35k per 100k. I did a tune up (throttle body was blacker then the abyss) so I did a full engine clean. Reset the reader and now for city I get 21k per 100k in the city and 14k per 100k on the highway (Toronto to Windsor). Now also I put a 6" suspension lift and I got 35" mudders on her. Most people don't realize that you gotta keep checking your tire pressure and if you haul any heavy loads you'll use more gas and if you don't properly maintain the vehicle....then you're asking for trouble. Also city driving veries on where in the city you drive. Downtown Toronto for example where there's a lot of stop and go from lights to people running across the streets uses more gas. Even when you turn on and off your vehicle,it sends a fuel shot. Also the AC uses gas (most people don't know that)So if you do a lot of stop and go's and turn off your engine in between....you're not saving much. Now my truck is nearly at 500k and milage has gotten better (compared to when I first got her) and she costs me $120 a week (I buy gas at costco) and I drive her everyday bringing the kids to and from school with trips in between. And one tank will last me 1 Saturday to the next. Also if you have a heavy foot and like to burn it out.....that will cost ya as well. But in all honesty when I was looking for a truck I was looking for something badass. Gas milage was last one my list 😎

I have a 2011 Cruze we drove from Thunder Bay to Winnipeg ( about 800km) plus drove around Winnipeg one tank of gas! Normally I can go two weeks on one tank just driving home to work and I have a 15/20 min drive to work.

Why does he talk about "American's" and "Canadian's" like they are two different people when Canadians are American's, too? Anyone from Peru, Brazil, Guatemala, Colombia, Venezuela, Mexico, Panama, the U.S. or Canada is an "AMERICAN". Why do people always use the term incorrectly? Look on the map. "AMERICA" is 3 different continents. North America, South America and Central America. It doesn't stop at the Canadian border. Canadians are just as much "AMERICAN'S" as U.S. citizens are. Why do people always use these incorrect statements? People living south of Canada she be called, "U.S. citizens", not just "American's." Everyone makes it like U.S. Citizens are the only American's on the planet when that is simply not true. All the news and movies all get it wrong. This needs to stop.

@mattmax11

9 жыл бұрын

Now fuck off and stop trying to start shit.

@CarMaintenanceGuy

9 жыл бұрын

***** Not starting shit. Just stating the facts. If you are from North America, whether it be from the USA or Canada, then you're an American. America does NOT stop at the US/Canadian/MEXICAN border. LOOK AT A MAP or GLOBE! American spans 3 continents.

@CarMaintenanceGuy

9 жыл бұрын

Moh Who the fuck are you calling a dumb ass? It's THREE, you dip shit. North America, Central America and South America. Get a fucking clue.

@WarthogRacer

9 жыл бұрын

GMoney America=USA

@CarMaintenanceGuy

9 жыл бұрын

WarthogRacer That's the way people always assume, but it's technically incorrect. A bunch of wrongs don't make a right.

I have a 1.6l petrol Ford Focus MK1 and I'm doing the exact as advertised mpg. 5.5l/100km on the highway and around 10l in the city with bumper to bumper traffic. Just to be clear I got the 5.5l on the highway running at 150-160 km/h half the way. I wanted to test the car. I did use the AC on the 1's level to not have foggy windows. I ran at night. The car was made in 2002 and I ran the test in 2015. Bought it from Germany at about 250.000 km. I guess they don't make them how they use to. Or the mpg is just given by the size of the car. The Focus MK1 only weighs 1200 kg and I did the test with an extra 200 kg in it (myself, my wife and our luggage).

I just bought a brand new 2019 VW Jetta, Rated at 40 mpg highway, 34 city. I don't do hardly any city driving, but doing the speed limit on the highway cruise set at 100 km/h It is getting more then its rated for, the car says its average is 44.8 mpg. I know they USED to be tested on the highway at 55 miles per hour (90km/h) not sure if thats still the case today.

I had a '91 Ford Taurus 3.olitre, around town, it could as bad as 13 mpg, but with 6 of us from NJ to Forest hill MD , could do 34mpg coalways, NJ to Bass River MAss 35mpg, retired IT after 250,000, Jan last replaced it with a 2013 Taurus had 21, 000, on IT mileage even local is about 16mpg. 3.5 liter engine

I have never had a problem getting any of my cars to consume fuel at the Transport Canada rating. But then again, I also know how to drive. My Honda Accord is rated at 12.1 in the city and I usually get 11.5.

4:15 - 4:48 London, Ontario!!

I own a 2011 Ford F150 Eco Boost and I get 8-10ltr/100km on the highway and 12-14ltr/100km city driving. It's the first Ford vehicle I have owned and I am quite happy with my fuel economy and with Ford.

@i.am.bermer1366

7 жыл бұрын

+Fanrabbit - Because I prefer a truck with power, accessibility and lots of room. I get want I expected from my Ford. You can enjoy your European vehicle and I'll stick with my Ford here in Canada.

In my experience buy a Honda Accord if you are worried about mileage, because I have had two different models of Honda Accord. 2015 Honda Accord (2.4) - Highway mileage at 140 km/h speed was 7.2 L/100 (I bought this car brand new, drove it for about 63000 Km and then I sold it. I would get 6 L/100 at 120 Km/h speed and sometimes even 5.5 to 5.8 L/100. 2008 Honda Accord (2.4) - Highway mileage at 130 km/h speed is 7.8 L/100 ( I bought this as a used car in 2016, I was 3rd owner of this car with 233000 Km on odometer, now I have 263000 Km on odometer, still getting same mileage as claimed by Honda.

Beware the MPG posted on the sticker is usually based on Imperial Gallon used in England. In the US, the gallon is smaller so you get a lower MPG #. For instance 6.0/100 in England would be 47 MPG but in the US you get 39 MPG. Of course a higher number posted on the window looks more attractive. Have a Subaru hybrid. The number vary a lot depends on traffic condition. On light traffic on the highway, I can sometimes get the posted 6.0L/100 with 4 passengers as long as the AC & heater is turned off (spring to fall). The vehicle needs to be kept at 100km/h with cruise control on and no aggressive driving / frequent passing. Need to be driving for at least 1/2h to get a good average. When starting, the efficiency # tend to be higher at 12L/100 and gradually drop. In the city driving moderate traffic I can manage to keep the number at 8.4L/100 or lower. You need some speed to keep the hybrid batteries charged. If you are in bumper-to-bumper or complete stop for too long (up to 10 min), the battery is low and you are just burning gas. Winter driving you get a much lower rating because the engine needs to warm up properly.

Forget the gas mileage, the service bills are unreal, especially Audi And VW, I drove across use and Canada in a Durango and got 8.1l per 100 I'm. I was very impressed. But bury the hammer and it was 25l per 100 km. But fuel was cheap around $3.00/ gallon and $60.00 to fill it, imagine in Ireland at €1.50/ liner!

I love my 2006 mazda6, it gives me 28 mpg, but I have to really gentle with my gas, and have to notice lights from a distance, I have to keep my tire pressure within a certain numbers, but sometime I do like to drive fast, then it comes down to 25 to 23 mpg

I drive my car with a very light foot and get exactly the mileage or close to. youre driving with a lead foot and brake abruptly instead of reading ahead and letting the car cruise when it can. not sure if they used a cover for the rear pickups, but its a significant benefit

Mary should remove the Thule roof rack. Much more drag on the highway. The wind diffuser reduces noise but increases drag as well. That's only part of it though my car is a vw too and doesn't do as well as advertised either.

2005 toyota echo 3.9l\100 km. no bells. no whistles.

Didn't Volkswagon come out with an apology that they lied about their gas mileage? This really gives this program validity.

I wish I was doing this test, with that beautiful truck. I am an American and would love nothing more, than traveling up through Canada! Love the beautiful country!

Already in the Ford ad we see a problem. Fuel efficency are not necesserly tied to the size of the engine. However; you cannot have a powerful engine that are also cheap on gas. Everything are compromise between those. I owned a 2006 Jetta FSI. It averaged about 6.5l/100km at about 130 km/h. Driving through Germany to Switzerland and back to Sweden I could go about 650km and then some on a single tank. Good engine.

Can you try on 2013 Ford Escape SE? 23-28-33... Getting 18-22-27. And this is in US, not Canada, after 15,000 miles.

I get 34 mpg on a 2015 audi a8 v8 4.0 supercharged. All you have to do is keep it between 1500 rpm to 1000 rpms. Thats it if you drive really fast your rpms goes up and you consume more gas.

Wonderful signing voice.

In the past 7 years I have two car that were identical a 2008 Nissan Altima Coupe SR and a 2012 Nissan Altima Coupe SR. The 2008 was totaled out due to flood damage and replaced by insurance company; both cars were new when purchased/replaced. Both were equipped with the same amenities except the 2012 had a slight front end redesign with the head lights and hood. Now I would conclude that the cars would get the same distance on a tank of gas with mixed driving, but to my surprise the 2008 was getting 650 miles to a tank (1046 km) and the 2012 is achieving 500 miles (805 km). What is the cause for the 150 mile (240 km) difference? I have had no change in driving habits or distances driven on a tank of gasoline.

these mpg numbers are there for have a comparison between brands and models. MPGs always changes based on driving, weight, accessories (like the thule roof rack in that vw), altitude, road conditions, weather etc. it will be almost impossible come up with a accurate MPG. that's why all cars are given a mpg rating by driven in a treadmill with the same "conditions" so manufactures have a mpg estimate so the customers can use as a comparative purposes.

The No. 1 thing people need to do is get a digital tire pressure gage and use it often if you want to get close to the milage on the sticker. Remember new tires believe it or not need to be broken in it's true your numbers will go down slightly with brand new tires. Some new car transmissions break in to the way someone drives their car so when you test drive certain cars the transmission shifting seems off. Once you drive the car for a few tanks of gas you will notice the difference in the shifting. If possible press on the pedal just enough so the transmission shifts at 2000 rpm on most cars the transmission will adapt to this and in combination with keeping your tire pressure right you will get very close to the sticker. I do it and get very close or what the sticker says. The old test was a 2 cycle test, the new test is a 5 cycle test.

In the US we used to deal with outrageous claims of fuel economy, but today the EPA only allows realistic fuel economy to be posted on the vehicle sticker.